Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 27795

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : November | Volume : 17 | Issue : 11 | Page : CC22 - CC25 Full Version

Choice Reaction Time in Different Phases of the Menstrual Cycle in Healthy Females: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: November 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/65305.18753
Parikshit Muley, Pranjali Muley, Purva Lanjekar, Puja Lanjekar, Shrutika Tathod, Surendra Wadikar

1. Professor, Department of Physiology, Datta Meghe Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Physiology, Datta Meghe Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 3. Undergraduate Student, Department of Physiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 4. Undergraduate Student, Department of Physiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 5. Undergraduate Student, Department of Physiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 6. Additional Professor, Department of Physiology, BYL Nair Charitable Hospital and Topiwala National Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Pranjali Muley,
N-20, Sneh Nagar, Wardha Road, Nagpur-440015, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: drpranjali11@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The gonadal hormone output of females fluctuates monthly, and the endometrium, ovaries, and other genital organs undergo physical changes. It is known that women experience fluctuations in mood, energy, and cognitive abilities during different phases of their Menstrual Cycle (MC). Reaction Time (RT) is utilised to measure the ability of brain processing. The present study analysed the effect of various phases occurring in the MC on choice RT.

Aim: To determine whether hormonal changes that occur throughout the MC and its phases may have any effect on cognition.

Materials and Methods: An observational analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Physiology at Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. The study duration was six months, from August 2021 to April 2022. A total of 50 apparently healthy females aged 18-25 years were included in the study. The subjects with a history of normal and regular MC for the last six months were included. The Choice Reaction Time (CRT) with visual and auditory stimuli was analysed using an RT apparatus developed by Anand Agencies, Pune, India. In CRT, random auditory and visual stimuli were given to the subjects, and they had to react accordingly. The RT apparatus timer started when the stimuli were given, and it automatically stopped when the subject reacted, providing the RT. RT was noted in the subjects on four occasions: two days prior to menstrual bleeding (premenstrual), the 2nd day during menstruation, the 8th day (follicular phase), and the 18th day after menstrual bleeding (luteal phase). The average value of each type of Visual Reaction Time (VRT) and Auditory Reaction Time (ART) in the various menstrual phases was noted and analysed. The level of significance in the various menstrual phases was analysed with inferential statistical study using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparison Tukey’s post-hoc test.

Results: In the present study, prolongation of visual and ART was seen in the luteal phase. There was prolongation of VRT when the luteal phase was compared to the menstrual and follicular phase, but the difference was not statistically significant (p<0.05). While in ART, there was prolongation when the luteal phase was compared with the premenstrual, menstrual, and follicular phase, but the difference was not statistically significant (p<0.05).

Conclusion: The current study reveals that there was a non significant prolongation of visual and ART in the luteal phase of MC when CRT was analysed. Thus, it was observed that there was no influence of fluctuating levels of ovarian hormones on ART and VRT in various phases of the MC while conducting CRT.

Keywords

Auditory reaction time, Menstrual phases, Visual reaction time

The MC is a complex process that involves several hormonal changes and physiological events. The monthly rhythmic variations in the sex hormones secreted during a female’s reproductive years usually result in physical changes to the endometrium, ovaries, and other genital organs. This monthly rhythmic pattern is known as the female sexual cycle, or more commonly, the MC (1). This activity is produced with the help of the hypothalamo-pituitary-ovarian axis (2).

The MC is divided into four phases: the follicular phase, ovulation, the luteal phase, and menstruation. The follicular phase begins on the first day of menstruation and lasts for approximately 14 days. During this phase, the Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) stimulates the growth of follicles in the ovaries. Ovulation occurs around day 14 of the MC when the mature follicle ruptures and releases an egg. The luteal phase begins after ovulation and lasts for approximately 14 days. During this phase, the ruptured follicle forms the corpus luteum, which produces progesterone. If fertilisation does not occur, the corpus luteum degenerates, and menstruation occurs (3).

It is well known that women experience fluctuations in mood, energy, and cognitive abilities during different phases of their MC. Cognitive ability is measured by RT (1). RT is an indicator of sensory-motor performance. It was employed in the present study as a technique to evaluate sensory-motor function (4). RT is the amount of time between the stimulus and the subject’s voluntary response (5). It is useful to quantify the efficiency with which the central nervous system processes information and responds to it. Several studies have investigated the effect of the MC on RT in healthy females. Some studies have found that RT is faster during the follicular phase compared to the luteal phase (1),(2),(6). Other studies have observed a prolongation of RT in the premenstrual phase (7),(8). Additional studies have found no significant difference in RT between the follicular and luteal phases (9),(10).

A person’s capacity to co-ordinate timely and appropriate responses to stimuli is measured by the Simple Reaction Time (SRT) test, which is typically regarded as a psychomotor test (4). However, in the CRT task, random stimuli are presented, and the subject is required to respond accordingly. Thus, the subject needs to perceive the stimulus, identify, analyse, and decide on the proper motor response (4). The stimuli in CRT are more complex and demand decisions about how to respond; thus, the test becomes much more cognitive (11). In CRT tasks, a variety of stimuli were provided at random, and the individual had to react in accordance with the stimulus. CRT is a challenging procedure that entails selecting the best response by recognising, differentiating, and analysing the input. The novelty of the study is that it analysed the effects of various hormonal changes occurring during menstrual phases on the cognitive performance of the central nervous system with the help of CRT.

Material and Methods

An observational analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Physiology at Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. The study duration was six months, from August 2021 to April 2022. A total of 50 apparently healthy female volunteers aged 18-25 years with a history of regular MC for the last six months were included in the study. The CRT with visual and auditory stimuli was analysed using an RT apparatus developed by Anand Agencies, Pune. Informed consent was obtained from the subjects who participated in the study. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee with reference number IEC/2020-21/8934 dated 08/07/2020.

Inclusion criteria: Subjects who provided consent and had regular menstrual cycles for the last six months were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Subjects with menstrual irregularities, dysmenorrhoea, use of any form of contraception (pills or devices), use of psychotropic drugs (sedatives, hypnotics, and tranquilizers), antihistamines, anti-epileptics, sleep disorders, any history of visual or hearing impairment, and any addictions such as smoking or alcohol consumption were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: The sample size was calculated using the following formula:

Unlimited population: n=z2×p(1-p)/?2

Finite population: n'= n/1+z2×p(1-p)?2 N

Where:
z-z score (90% confidence level) -1.64
p-population proportion -50% (0.5)
e-margin of error - 10% (0.1)
N-180 (finite population size) (number of female medical students on campus)

n=(1.642×0.5×(1-0.5))/(0.12)=67

n’=67/(1+(67-1)/180Ëœ49 (sample size for the study)

Study Procedure

Visual Reaction Time (VRT): Red and green lights were used to provide the visual stimulus. Both the subject and the examiner were seated on opposite sides of an opaque partition. When the researcher pressed the switch, a fixed fore period of one second of visual stimuli was displayed on the front screen. When the individual responded to the stimuli by pushing a key, the RT apparatus stopped measuring time after a fore interval of one second. This time was recorded as VRT. Similarly, for the auditory stimulus (beep tone), the same procedure was followed to measure ART. For both the visual and auditory reaction speeds, the test was performed three times. The three VRT and ART readings were noted, and the lowest reading was considered for the analysis of the study.

In the above description, VRT and ART were mentioned as components of CRT, where the researcher randomly presented either a visual (red or green light) or auditory stimulus to the subject after a fixed fore period of one second. The subject had to respond by pressing the switch on their side. This task of randomly presenting a stimulus and reacting to it is referred to as CRT. The time interval between stimulus application and the response 23is measured as RT in milliseconds. The CRT was conducted on four occasions of the menstrual cycle: two days prior to menstrual bleeding (premenstrual), the 2nd day during menstruation, the 8th day (follicular/proliferative phase), and the 18th day after menstrual bleeding (luteal/secretory phase) (7).

Statistical Analysis

The average value of each type of CRT in different phases of the menstrual cycle (premenstrual, menstrual, follicular, and luteal) was noted and analysed. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including one-way ANOVA and the multiple comparison Tukey’s post hoc test. The software used for the analysis was Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27.0, and a significance level of p<0.05 was considered.

Results

In (Table/Fig 1), the mean value of CRT by visual stimuli with the standard deviation in various phases of the MC is provided. When the one-way ANOVA test was applied to the descriptive data (as shown in (Table/Fig 2)), a significant difference in CRT to visual stimuli was observed. Furthermore, the data was statistically compared using the multiple comparison Tukey’s post-hoc test (presented in (Table/Fig 3)), which revealed a statistically significant prolongation of VRT in the luteal/secretory phase compared to the premenstrual phase of MC. It was also noted that there was a prolongation of VRT when comparing the luteal phase to the menstrual and follicular phases, although the difference was not statistically significant.

Similarly, in (Table/Fig 4), the mean value of CRT by auditory stimuli, along with the standard deviation in various phases of MC, is given. The one-way ANOVA test (depicted in (Table/Fig 5)) indicated no significant difference in ART among the phases of MC. Additionally, the multiple comparison Tukey’s test (shown in (Table/Fig 6)) demonstrated a prolongation of ART when comparing the luteal phase with the premenstrual, menstrual, and follicular phases, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Discussion

The objective of the current study was to observe whether sex hormones secreted across the menstrual phases affect cognitive functions, specifically RT. In present study, both visual and auditory stimulus-based CRT tests were administered to subjects in different phases of the MC.

In the CRT study, it was found that VRT was significantly prolonged in the luteal/secretory phase compared to the premenstrual phase of MC. However, when comparing the luteal phase to the menstrual and follicular phases, there was a prolongation of VRT, but the difference was not statistically significant. For ART, there was a prolongation in the luteal phase compared to the premenstrual, menstrual, and follicular phases, but again, the difference was not statistically significant.

These results are in agreement with a study conducted by Veena CN et al., which observed non significant differences in ART and VRT between the mid-secretory phase and proliferative phase (9). Bhutkar MV and Aparna L noticed non significant differences in ART and VRT among the premenstrual phase, post-menstrual phase, and menstrual phase of MC (10). Donadi A et al., also observed no statistically significant influence of oestrogen and progesterone on reaction time (ART and VRT) between the premenstrual and post-menstrual phases of MC (11).

However, some other studies have shown a prolongation of reaction time in the luteal phase. Kumar S et al., observed delayed ART and VRT in the luteal phase compared to other phases (1). Patel J et al., concluded that ART is increased in the luteal phase (6). Garg R et al., observed a significant delay in reaction time during the luteal phase compared to other MC phases (2).

On the other hand, some studies have observed a prolongation of reaction time in the premenstrual phase. Nene AS and Pazare PA noticed a significant increase in ART during the premenstrual phase (7). Sudheer C et al., observed a significant prolongation of both ART and VRT during the menstrual phase (8). Patel J et al., observed a significant prolongation of both simple VRT and choice VRT in the premenstrual phase (12).

The main cause of increased RT in the luteal phase is the influence of sex hormones, primarily progesterone, which leads to the retention of salt and water. This hormonal influence affects axonal conduction, causing a prolongation of RT (2). The delayed axonal conduction reduces impulse conduction and increases RT by altering the availability of neurotransmitters at synapses (13). Oestrogen decreases the synthesis of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA), leading to increased activation of glutamate receptors. Progesterone decreases neuronal excitability and improves GABA neurotransmission. The varying levels of oestrogen and progesterone throughout the premenstrual and postmenstrual phases contribute to the more prolonged RTs in the premenstrual phase (11),(14). Additionally, the menstrual cycle can cause changes in corneal thickness, with the thinnest point at the cycle’s beginning and the thickest at the end. This might be a reason for diminished eyesight and prolonged VRT during the premenstrual phase (11),(15).

The strength of the present study lies in the use of CRT tests instead of SRT tests employed in other similar studies. SRT tests are typically considered psychomotor tests, while CRT tests involve more complex stimuli that require analysis and decision-making in response (4),(16). Consequently, CRT tests are more cognitively demanding (4),(16). Therefore, CRT is more sensitive to latency as additional time is required for cognitive stimulus analysis (16),(17). The present study revealed a non significant prolongation of visual and auditory reaction times during the luteal phase when analysed using CRT. The observations suggest that fluctuating levels of ovarian hormones do not significantly influence CRT with auditory and visual stimuli during various phases of the menstrual cycle. The study’s findings indicate that cognitive performance is not greatly influenced by different phases of the menstrual cycle. In future research, including other cognitive function tests related to attention, perception, memory, intelligence, and language could provide further insights into cognitive functions.

Limitation(s)

The study had several limitations. Firstly, it was a cross-sectional study with a restricted age group of 18-25 years, which limited the generalisability of the study’s conclusions to the entire population. Additionally, increasing the sample size would help reduce errors in the study group and enhance the reliability of the findings. Furthermore, the study focused solely on the CRT test as the parameter for assessing cognitive function. Future research could consider incorporating other cognitive testing parameters to investigate the effects of hormonal changes on cognition.

Conclusion

There was a statistically significant prolongation of VRT in the luteal/secretory phase compared to the premenstrual phase of the MC. However, when comparing the luteal phase to the menstrual and follicular phases, there was a prolongation of VRT, but the difference was not statistically significant. During the CRT for auditory stimulus, there was a prolongation of ART in the luteal phase compared to the premenstrual, menstrual, and follicular phases, but again, the difference was not statistically significant. The study suggested that there is a non significant prolongation of CRT in the luteal phase of the MC, indicating that fluctuating levels of ovarian hormones do not significantly influence CRT with auditory and visual stimuli during various phases of the MC.

References

1.
Kumar S, Mufti M, Kisan R. Variation of reaction time in different phases of menstrual cycle. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(8):1604-05.
2.
Garg R, Malhotra V, Dhar U, Tripathi Y. Study of visual online reaction time in different phases of menstrual cycle in healthy females. Int J Cur Res Rev. 2014;6(17):41-43.
3.
Jain AK, Textbook of Physiology, Volume II, Chapter- 73; 9 th edition; Avichal Publishing Company; 2021;704-18.
4.
Muley PA, Wadikar SS, Muley PP. Effect of exam Stress on reaction time in medical students. Indian J Basic Appl Med Res. 2016;5(4):733-39.
5.
Wadikar SS, Muley PA, Muley PP. A comparative study of gender difference in reaction time in response to exam stress among first-year medical students. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2017;7(2):209-13. [crossref]
6.
Patel J, Jamliya M, Mehta HB, Shah CJ. Study of auditory reaction time during follicular and luteal phase of menstrual cycle. Int J Basic Appl Physiol. 2019;8(1):97-100.
7.
Nene AS, Pazare PA. A study of auditory reaction time in different phases of the normal menstrual cycle. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2010;54(4):386-90.
8.
Sudheer C, Jagadeesan S, Kammar KF. Auditory and visual reaction times during the menstrual cycle. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2017;7(3):297-300. [crossref]
9.
Veena CN, Vastrad BC, Nandan TM. Study of auditory and visual reaction time across various phases of menstrual cycle. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2017;7(4):339-42. [crossref]
10.
Bhutkar MV, Aparna L. Study of audiovisual reaction time and critical fusion frequency in different phases of menstrual cycle. National Journal of Basic Medical Sciences. 2016;6(3):100-05.
11.
Donadi A, Munagapati T, Pernenkil S. Study on variation of simple reaction time during menstrual cycle among undergraduate medical students. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2020;10(8):641-44. [crossref]
12.
Patel J, Jamliya M, Mehta HB, Shah CJ. Effect of follicular and luteal phase of menstrual cycle on visual reaction time in healthy adult females. Int J Basic Appl Physiol. 2018;7(1):115-17.
13.
Das S, Gandhi A, Mondal S. Effect of premenstrual stress on audiovisual reaction time and audiogram. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1997;41(1):67-70.
14.
Kawamura S, Iwasaki H, Nakayama K. Changes in neural excitability across the menstrual cycle via GABAergic signaling regulation by ovarian hormones. Nihon Rinsho. 2015;73(4):576-80.
15.
Giuffre G, Di Rosa L, Fiorino F, Bubella DM, Lodato G. Variations in central corneal thickness during the menstrual cycle in women. Cornea. 2007;26(2):144-46. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Shinde PC, Pazare PA. Effect of distraction on choice reaction time in normal females and males. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2014;3(8):362-71.
17.
Robert Sessions Woodworth, Julius William Kling, Harold Schlosberg, Lorrin Andrews Riggs: Woodworth & Schlosberg’s Experimental Psychology. Julius William Kling, Lorrin Andrews Riggs (ed): Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971;1279.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/65305.18753

Date of Submission: May 08, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Aug 10, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Oct 05, 2023
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 13, 2023
• Manual Googling: Sep 30, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Oct 01, 2023 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com