Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 33358

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2023 | Month : October | Volume : 17 | Issue : 10 | Page : UR01 - UR03 Full Version

Various Anaesthetic Techniques used in the Management of Traumatic Diaphragmatic Hernia: A Series of Three Cases


Published: October 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/65356.18591
Geetha Soundarya Udayakumar, Haanah Mounika Nunna

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Junior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Geetha Soundarya Udayakumar,
7, CLC Works Road, Chromepet, Chennai-600044, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: gsound15@gmail.com

Abstract

Traumatic diaphragmatic hernia is relatively uncommon and occurs most commonly after a road traffic accident (5%). Diaphragmatic rupture is mostly associated with vital organ injuries such as the liver, spleen, lungs, bones, pelvis, and brain, which can be severely damaged. The anaesthetic management of a patient presenting with traumatic diaphragmatic hernia depends on any associated vital organ injuries. Hereby, the author present a case series of three patients with traumatic diaphragmatic hernia with different presentations managed accordingly. In the first case, a 37-year-old male presented with diaphragmatic hernia and cervical spine fracture following a road traffic accident. Awake fibreoptic intubation was performed with utmost care to avoid further injury to the cervical spine. After intubation, positive pressure ventilation was given with low tidal volume to avoid barotrauma and to expand the atelectatic lung. The second case involved a 48-year-old male with a history of falling from a height one week prior, who presented with right-sided diaphragmatic rupture and a liver contusion. Intubation was performed using a left-sided double-lumen tube, and one-lung ventilation was applied to facilitate thoracotomy. A thoracic paravertebral block was administered to alleviate postoperative pain, providing good pain relief. In the third case, a 56-year-old male with a known case of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) presented to the hospital following a road traffic accident. The patient had lung contusion and haemopneumothorax with poor pulmonary reserve, and required emergency surgical repair. Combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia was preferred over general anaesthesia, as intubation may cause bronchospasm and life-threatening complications in COPD patients.

Keywords

Combined spinal-epidural, Double-lumen tube, Fibreoptic intubation, Thoracic paravertebral block

Diaphragmatic rupture mainly occurs due to blunt trauma or penetrating injury to the abdomen, which can manifest as respiratory distress or obstruction. Diaphragmatic herniation is more commonly observed in the left dome (90%) than in the right dome (10%), primarily due to the protective effect of the liver and right kidney (1). Here, three patients presented with traumatic diaphragmatic hernia and associated vital organ injuries, where various anaesthetic techniques were employed for management.

In the first case, awake fibreoptic intubation was performed to secure the airway as the patient presented with a cervical spine fracture. Intravenous analgesics were administered for postoperative pain relief. The second case involved a right thoracotomy approach, where a left-sided double-lumen tube was inserted, and one-lung ventilation was employed to facilitate thoracotomy. Additionally, a thoracic paravertebral block was administered for postoperative analgesia. The third case featured a patient with known COPD who presented with lung contusion and poor pulmonary reserve. In this scenario, combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia was preferred over general anaesthesia.

Case Report

Case 1

A 37-year-old male reported to the Emergency Room (ER) following a road traffic accident. The patient presented with complaints of difficulty in breathing and dizziness. After initial resuscitation, the patient was diagnosed with a cervical spine fracture and diaphragmatic rupture. The patient was immediately shifted to the operating theatre. On examination, his pulse rate was 102 per minute, and his blood pressure was 130/80 mmHg. He exhibited tachypnea with a respiratory rate of 25/min, a breath-holding time of 12 seconds, and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 14/15. Auscultation revealed significantly reduced air entry on the left side. Chest X-ray showed right-sided heart shift and bowel loops in the left mid and lower thorax. CT abdomen and chest revealed defects in the left hemidiaphragm with herniation of the stomach and hepatic flexure of the colon, along with collapse of the left lung. MRI of the spine showed a wedge compression fracture of the C1-C2 vertebrae, which could be managed conservatively.

Awake nasal fibreoptic intubation was planned considering the cervical spine fracture, and the procedure was explained to the patient. In the operating room, standard monitors were attached, and two wide-bore cannulas were secured. The patient received intramuscular injection of glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg and intravenous bolus dose of dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg over 10 minutes. Airway anaesthesia was achieved by bilateral superior laryngeal nerve block with 2% lignocaine (2 mL on each side) and a transtracheal injection of 4 mL of 4% lignocaine. Lignocaine jelly was used for topicalisation of the nasal cavity. With the patient in the supine position, Fibreoptic Bronchoscopy (FOB) was performed from the head end of the patient through the right nostril. A preloaded 7 mm endotracheal tube was guided into the trachea without any complications. The patient remained co-operative and comfortable throughout the procedure, and the position of the endotracheal tube was confirmed with FOB. The patient was induced with intravenous fentanyl 100 mcg, propofol 140 mg, and atracurium 40 mg, and maintained on a mixture of nitrous oxide (N2O) and oxygen (O2) in a ratio of 50:50, along with sevoflurane at 1-2% concentration.

Surgery was preceded by a left thoracoabdominal incision while the patient remained in the supine position. The herniated contents were reduced into the intra abdominal cavity, and the diaphragm was repaired. Positive pressure of 30 cm H2O was applied to expand the collapsed left lung, resulting in improved air entry on the left side. Vital signs were maintained throughout the procedure. For postoperative analgesia, the patient received 1 g of intravenous paracetamol and 100 mg of tramadol intramuscularly. After adequate recovery, the patient was extubated and shifted to the postoperative ward. The patient was discharged on the 8th postoperative day.

Case 2

A 48-year-old male presented to the ER with complaints of breathing difficulty and abdominal pain persisting for the past five days. He reported a fall from a height one week prior. On examination, his heart rate was 106/min, blood pressure was 100/60 mmHg, respiratory rate was 28/min, and his Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was 15/15. Tenderness was noted over the right upper quadrant of the abdomen, and decreased breath sounds were heard on the right side. Chest X-ray revealed elevation of the right hemidiaphragm with herniation of the colon and segmental atelectasis of the middle and lower lobes of the right lung (Table/Fig 1). Computed Tomography (CT) chest confirmed right diaphragmatic hernia with herniation of the hepatic flexure of the colon, segmental atelectasis of the middle and lower lobes of the right lung, and subcapsular hematoma of the right lobe of the liver. Right thoracotomy (2) and hernia repair were planned with one-lung ventilation. A nasogastric tube was inserted, and central venous cannulation was performed on the left internal jugular vein. An arterial line was secured on the right radial artery. The patient was resuscitated with crystalloids.

After preoxygenation, the patient was induced with glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg, midazolam 1 mg, fentanyl 100 mcg, propofol 160 mg, and atracurium 40 mg. A left-sided double-lumen tube (Robertshaw No. 39) was inserted, and mechanical ventilation was initiated in volume control mode with a tidal volume of 6 ml/kg, respiratory rate of 14/minute, and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) of 5 cm H2O. Anaesthesia was maintained with a mixture of N2O:O2 - 50% and 1-2% sevoflurane. The patient was then positioned in the left decubitus position, and surgery was performed through a right thoracotomy approach. Lung isolation technique using 100% oxygen was employed in the initial stage of the surgery. Once the contents were reduced and the diaphragmatic defect was repaired, both lungs were ventilated. A right-sided chest tube was inserted, and at the end of the surgery, a 20 G catheter was placed in the thoracic paravertebral space under surgical visualisation for postoperative analgesia. The catheter was activated with 10 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine, repeated every 6th hour postoperatively. Vital signs remained stable throughout the procedure. After turning the patient supine, ventilation to both lungs was resumed with a positive pressure of 30 cm H2O to expand the collapsed lung. The patient was extubated on the table and shifted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for observation. The paravertebral catheter was removed on the second postoperative day. A chest X-ray taken on the 5th postoperative day showed complete inflation of the right lung (Table/Fig 2). The patient was discharged on the 10th postoperative day.

Case 3

A 56-year-old male presented with a history of a road traffic accident three hours prior. He was diagnosed with a left lung contusion and left diaphragmatic hernia. The patient was taken to the operating room for diaphragmatic hernia repair. He had a known history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and was using a foracort rotahaler. On examination, his heart rate was 95 beats per minute, blood pressure was 140/100 mmHg, respiratory rate was 24 breaths per minute, breath-holding time was 15 seconds, and his Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was 15/15. Tenderness was noted over the left upper quadrant, with decreased air entry and bilateral crepitations on the left side. CT findings showed gastric herniation into the left thoracic space, contusion of the left lung, and haemopneumothorax. An intercostal drainage tube was placed on the left side before the patient was shifted to the operating theatre. The patient received nebulisation with bronchodilators preoperatively.

Considering the lung contusion and COPD, a combined spinal epidural technique was planned. The patient was positioned in the left lateral position, and under aseptic precautions, a 20 G epidural catheter was inserted at the T7-T8 level. A test dose of 3 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine was administered. A subarachnoid block was performed at the L3-L4 space with 3 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and 20 mcg of fentanyl. A sensory level of T4 was achieved. The patient was sedated with intravenous midazolam (0.04 mg/kg) and received oxygen at a rate of 6 L/min via a Hudson’s mask. After positioning the patient in the supine position, the surgeons entered the abdominal cavity using a left thoracoabdominal approach. A tear was found in the left dome of the diaphragm, and the contents were reduced into the abdominal cavity. The patient remained comfortable throughout the procedure. The patient experienced minimal hypotension, which was managed with two bolus doses of ephedrine (12 mg) and crystalloid infusion. At the end of the surgery, the epidural was activated with a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at a rate of 4 mL per hour for two days. The patient was shifted to the surgical ICU for observation and then transferred to the ward on the 2nd postoperative day after removal of the epidural catheter. The patient was discharged on the 7th postoperative day.

Discussion

Traumatic diaphragmatic hernia (TDH) most commonly occurs after road traffic accidents (5%) and is often associated with vital organ injury. The clinical presentation depends on the extent of diaphragmatic rupture, herniation of hollow viscera, and vital organ injury (3). Anaesthesia for TDH is challenging, particularly when it is associated with vital organ injury. The pathophysiology of TDH includes respiratory depression due to decreased diaphragmatic function, herniation of abdominal contents into the thoracic cavity, atelectasis (4), mediastinal shift to the right, circulatory collapse, and cardiac compromise. Various anaesthesia methods have been proposed for managing these patients. The routine recommended methods include awake intubation, nasogastric tube insertion (5), avoidance of mask ventilation, controversial administration of nitrous oxide to maintain spontaneous ventilation after induction of anaesthesia, and one-lung ventilation [6,7]. Spontaneous ventilation after induction of anaesthesia, recommended by Lobb TR et al., carries the risk of cough, which could worsen the diaphragmatic rupture (8). Yoshidome K et al., reported a case in which the patient’s lung herniated into the abdominal cavity following prolonged mechanical ventilation, indicating that positive pressure ventilation could prevent herniation of abdominal viscera into the thoracic cavity (9). Positive pressure ventilation can prevent viscera from entering the thoracic cavity, and spontaneous ventilation is no longer recommended (10). Al Skaini MS et al., reported that negative intrathoracic pressure may worsen diaphragmatic rupture and herniation of abdominal contents into the thoracic cavity (11).

Temizel F et al., and Williams DJ and Sandby-Thomas MG recommended the use of a double-lumen tube and one-lung ventilation with precautions to prevent perioperative hypoxia and hypercarbia, although the insertion of a double-lumen tube is time-consuming and associated with a higher failure rate due to mediastinal shift causing difficult intubation (12),(13). Pahwa D et al., recommended regional anaesthesia to minimise the need for postoperative ventilatory support associated with general anaesthesia (14). Regional anaesthesia reduces the risk of aspiration, as patients with TDH are considered to have a full stomach. TDH can be incidentally detected during preoperative investigations or intraoperatively when patients undergo other surgeries such as laparotomy or laparoscopy (15). The first case was managed with utmost care to avoid further injury to the cervical spine. Awake fibreoptic intubation was performed, and positive pressure ventilation was given with low tidal volume to prevent barotrauma and expand the atelectatic lung. In the second case, a double-lumen tube was used for intubation, and one-lung ventilation was applied to facilitate thoracotomy. Intubating patients with mediastinal shift using a double-lumen tube poses a challenge to anaesthesiologists. The surgeon inserted a thoracic paravertebral catheter through a separate skin puncture, one level below the incision site. A 20 G catheter was threaded in the extrapleural space under direct visualisation, and the tip was positioned to cover two intercostal spaces (16).

To alleviate postoperative pain, 10 mL of 0.2% bupivacaine was administered as bolus doses every six hours. Early initiation of postoperative chest physiotherapy was possible due to effective pain relief, which aided in lung expansion, reduced pulmonary infection, and prevented atelectasis. In the third case, a known COPD patient with lung contusion and haemopneumothorax and poor pulmonary reserve underwent emergency surgical repair. Combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia was chosen over general anaesthesia to avoid bronchospasm and life-threatening complications in COPD patients. Thoracic epidural anaesthesia was recommended by Mineo TC et al., for thoracic surgeries as it improves diaphragmatic function and provides better postoperative analgesia compared to patient-controlled intravenous administration of opioids (17). Few studies have been published on the use of regional techniques for surgical anaesthesia in diaphragmatic hernia repair. The present case series demonstrates the successful management of TDH with lung contusion using combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia.

Conclusion

The anaesthetic management of traumatic diaphragmatic hernia depends on the extent of diaphragmatic rupture, associated vital organ injury, and the patient’s co-morbid conditions. The present case series describes three patients with different presentations of traumatic diaphragmatic hernia and their respective management approaches. Nasogastric tube insertion, mechanical ventilation with low tidal volume, and intercostal drainage are preferred anaesthetic management techniques. Regional anaesthesia is a successful alternative to general anaesthesia, particularly in high-risk patients with poor pulmonary reserve. Regional anaesthesia provides better pain relief, allowing for early initiation of physiotherapy and reducing the risk of atelectasis. The ultimate goals of present study was to provide adequate pain relief, promote lung expansion, prevent atelectasis, and minimise the need for postoperative ventilatory support, thus reducing morbidity.

References

1.
Estrera AS, Landay MJ, McClelland RN. Blunt traumatic rupture of the right hemidiaphragm: Experience in 12 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 1985;39(6):525-30. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Fangbiao Z, Chunhui Z, Chun Z, Hongcan S, Xiangyan Z, Shaosong T. Thoracotomy for traumatic diaphragmatic hernia. Indian J Surg. 2016,78(5):371-74. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Lim KH, Park J. Blunt traumatic diaphragmatic rupture: Single-center experience with 38 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(41):e12849. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Peer SM, Devaraddeppa PM, Buggi S. Traumatic diaphragmatic hernia-our experience. Int J Surg. 2009;7(6):547-49. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Loehning RW, Takaori M, Safar P. Circulatory collapse from anesthesia for diaphragmatic hernia. Arch Surg. 1965;90:109-14. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Khadgaray RN, Shah S, Baral PP. Traumatic diaphragmatic hernia: Anaesthetic consideration. Journal of Universal College of Medical Sciences. 2018;6(2):73-75. [crossref]
7.
Yee LL, Rubin AS, Bellamy RF. Chapter 19, Thoracic Injuries. Anesthesia and Perioperative Care of the Combat Casualty. In: Zajtchuk R, Grande CM, editors. Textbook of Military Medicine Series, Vol 1, Part IV, Surgical Combat Casualty Care. Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, USA; 1995. pp. 455-77.
8.
Lobb TR, Butlin GR. Anaesthesia and traumatic diaphragmatic hernia. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1974;21(2):173-80. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Yoshidome K, Takenaka H, Iwase K, Kurozumi K, Nishimura Y, Ohshima S, et al. Traumatic rupture of the diaphragm- a case of lung herniation into the ab-dominal cavity. Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1992;40(4):560-63.
10.
Safaeian R, Hassani V, Faiz HR. Anesthesia for traumatic diaphragmatic hernia associated with corneal laceration. Am J Case Rep. 2016;17:646-49. Doi: 10.12659/ajcr.897908. PMID: 27595907; PMCID: PMC5013980. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Al Skaini MS, Sadar A, Haroon H, Al Ghamdi SM, Homran A, Rabie ME, et al. Traumatic diaphragmatic hernia: delayed presentation with tension viscerothorax-lessons to learn. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013;95(2):e27-29. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Temizel F, Kuzucuog? lu T, Arslan G, Uçkun S, Çevik BE, Demirhan R. Anesthesia in a patient with diaphragmatic hernia and obstructive sleep apnea South. Clin Ist Eu. 2017;28(3):241-44. [crossref]
13.
Williams DJ, Sandby-Thomas MG. Anaesthetic management of acute gastric volvulus in an adult. Br J Anaesth. 2003;90(1):96-98. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Pahwa D, Salgaonkar S, Mahapatra S, Tendoolkar B, Dewoolkar L. Regional anaesthesia in a case of traumatic diaphragmatic hernia. The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology. 2006;15(1):01-05. [crossref]
15.
Özdemir M, Yanli PY, Tomruk S¸ G, Bakan N. Anaesthesia management of a patient with incidentally diagnosed diaphragmatic hernia during laparoscopic surgery. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2015;43(1):50-54. Doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2014.82787. Epub 2014 Sep 9. PMID: 27366465; PMCID: PMC4917126. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Elsayed H. Insertion of paravertebral block catheters intraoperatively to reduce incidence of block failure. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012;14(5):648- 49. Doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivr055. Epub 2012 Feb 17. PMID: 22345056; PMCID: PMC3329287. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Mineo TC. Epidural anesthesia in awake thoracic surgery. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2007;32(1):13-19.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/65356.18591

Date of Submission: May 10, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jun 15, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jul 26, 2023
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 15, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jun 23, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jul 22, 2023 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com