Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 37019

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : October | Volume : 17 | Issue : 10 | Page : UC07 - UC11 Full Version

Postoperative Assessment of Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients Undergoing Transurethral resection of the Prostate under Spinal Anaesthesia: A Prospective Cohort Study


Published: October 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63763.18519
Hassaan Muhammed, K Rameshwara Reddy, T Chandra Sekhar, Karanam Sandhya, Nukala Dinesh, A Siva Prasad, Deshavath Manesh Naik, P Greeshma Teja

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, PES Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Viswabharathi Medical College, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, PES Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 4. Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, PES Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 5. Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, PES Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 6. Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, PES Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 7. Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, PES Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 8. Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology,, PES Institute of Medical Sciences and R

Correspondence Address :
Dr. T Chandra Sekhar,
Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, PES Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Kuppam-517425, Andhra Pradesh, India.
E-mail: dr.chandu24@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction (POCD) is a common disorder following surgery that threatens the quality of patients’ lives. POCD is closely associated with perioperative factors such as age, physical state, surgery duration, anaesthesia method, intraoperative hypotension, and infection. Among these factors, age is the only long-term risk factor for POCD. The relationship between anaesthesia depth and the incidence of POCD is debatable.

Aim: To assess POCD in patients undergoing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) and to examine the association between the duration of surgery and serum sodium levels with cognitive dysfunction.

Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Anesthesiology, PES Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India, from January 2020 to June 2021. The study included 100 patients aged over 60 years who were scheduled for TURP surgery under Spinal Anaesthesia. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) test was performed in the preoperative holding area, and the results were recorded. A decline in cognitive function was defined as a loss of 2 or more points on the MMSE test compared to the preoperative value. Serum sodium levels and MMSE scores were measured before surgery. Serum sodium levels and MMSE scores were also recorded after the 1st hour and 6th hour postoperatively. The data were entered into MS Excel 2007 and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0.

Results: In the present study, out of 100 subjects, the majority of patients (33%) belonged to the age group of 66-70 years, and most of the study subjects (79%) were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) II status, followed by ASA III status. The mean age of the study participants was 69.3 years. The mean duration of surgery was 45.6 minutes. A statistically significant difference (p<0.05) was observed when comparing the mean serum sodium levels before surgery (138.1±1.5 mmol/L) with those at the 1st hour postoperatively (135.9±1.6 mmol/L) and 6th hour postoperatively (134.4±1.4 mmol/L). The mean MMSE score before surgery and at the 1st hour and 6th hour postoperatively was the same (27.6±0.8), and there was no statistically significant difference between them. The MMSE score did not vary with the serum sodium levels, and this difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05).

Conclusion: In the present study, patients undergoing TURP procedures under spinal anaesthesia did not exhibit any POCD, despite a considerable drop in serum sodium levels. It is worth noting that all patients were asymptomatic.

Keywords

Cognitive impairment, Glycine, Prostate, Serum sodium

A standardised MMSE tool was used to assess cognitive skills in patients undergoing TURP preoperatively and postoperatively. Fluid absorption was the factor most strongly correlated with changes in the MMSE score postoperatively. However, the preoperative health status, choice of anaesthesia, and perioperative hemodynamics had no impact on the MMSE score (1),(2). To date, literature provides little evidence regarding the impact of TURP syndrome on mental functions postoperatively, which is an interesting aspect to study, especially in the elderly population. According to the Indian Census 2021, the percentage of the population aged 60 years and above is 10.1% of the total population (3). Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) is a common urological disease among older men. Although BPH rarely causes symptoms before the age of 40, its occurrence and symptoms increase with age. BPH affects approximately 50% of men between the ages of 60 years and up to 90% of men older than 80 years (4). BPH significantly impacts the Quality of Life (QOL) of many patients (5). TURP is a surgical option for men with BPH (6). It involves the use of irrigating fluid to dilate mucosal spaces, remove blood, cut tissue, and debris from the operating field, and improve visualisation (7). TURP syndrome is a potential complication resulting from the systemic absorption of hypotonic irrigating fluid. It manifests in various clinical symptoms due to the absorption of a large volume of irrigating fluid (1.5% glycine), leading to electrolyte imbalances (hyponatremia and hyperkalemia), confusion, and cognitive impairment in the postoperative period. These symptoms primarily arise from circulatory fluid overload, water intoxication, toxicity of the irrigant solute, and volume of the irrigating fluid (8),(9),(10).

POCD can be detected in approximately 10-25% of patients (11). The incidence of cognitive dysfunction varies from 10% to 46% depending on the type of surgery (12). Furthermore, POCD is a common complication associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and reduced QOL (13),(14). The MMSE is a widely used cognitive assessment tool that detects POCD in multiple cognitive domains, including orientation, registration, attention and calculation, immediate recall, language, short-term memory, and constructional ability. The examination typically takes 5-15 minutes, and while it has high specificity, it has low sensitivity in detecting mild cognitive impairment (15),(16).

Due to the duration of the procedure, pre-existing neurological conditions, irrigating solute, and volume, a significant number of elderly patients undergoing TURP surgery under general anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia experienced postoperative cognitive impairment (17). Two factors contributing to POCD were hyponatremia and glycine toxicity. Analysing serum sodium levels and limiting irrigant volume during the perioperative phase may aid in early identification and management of TURP syndrome (18). This study aimed to evaluate whether TURP syndrome could cause POCD in elderly patients undergoing TURP by monitoring preoperative serum sodium and MMSE scores, as well as postoperative serum sodium and MMSE scores. Additionally, the study assessed resection time, resected volume of the prostate gland, and the amount of 1.5% glycine associated with POCD.

Material and Methods

The prospective Cohort study was conducted over a period of one year and six months, from January 2020 to June 2021, at PES Institute of Medical Sciences and Research in Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India. Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) approval (No: PESIMSR/IHEC/89) was obtained, and written informed consent was taken from all participants involved in the study. A total of 100 adult male patients aged above 60 years were scheduled for elective TURP surgery under spinal anaesthesia.

Sample size calculation: A sample size of 100 was calculated based on Xue P et al., study, with a prevalence of 7.8% and an absolute precision of 6 (17). According to these values, the estimated sample size was 76, but for better calculations, the sample size was taken as 100.

Inclusion criteria: The study included patients above 60 years of age, ASA physical status I/II/III, who were scheduled for elective TURP surgeries under spinal anaesthesia.

Exclusion criteria: The study excluded patients unable to read and write or with impaired hearing, patients with a history of metabolic and neuropsychiatric disorders, patients with a history of alcohol consumption and drug dependence, and patients with a past medical history of neurological or other diseases.

Study Procedure

All patients underwent pre-anesthetic assessment prior to TURP surgery. Routine investigations, such as complete blood count, liver and renal function tests, serum electrolytes, electrocardiography, chest X-ray, random blood sugar, echocardiography, and ultrasound abdomen, were performed and optimised if necessary. The MMSE test was conducted in the preoperative holding area, and the results were recorded. The MMSE test has a maximum score of 30 points, with scores of 23 or below indicating cognitive impairment. In this study, a decline in cognitive function was determined by a loss of 2 or more points on the MMSE test compared to the preoperative value. The serum sodium level and the MMSE score were noted before the surgery. All five ASA standard monitors were connected and preloaded with 10 mL/kg of 0.9% normal saline. Aseptic subarachnoid block was performed in the lateral or sitting position using 3 mL of 0.5% Bupivacaine at the L3-L4 intervertebral disc space, resulting in satisfactory analgesia up to the T10 dermatome level. Patients were positioned in the lithotomy posture, and the TURP procedure 8began with 1.5% glycine irrigation fluid. The height of the irrigation fluid column was maintained at 60 cm, measured from the level of the patients’ pubic symphysis on the operating table.

Haemodynamics like Heart Rate (HR), Blood Pressure (BP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), Respiratory Rate (RR), and Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) were monitored intraoperatively every five minutes. At the end of the surgery, the resected prostate tissue was collected and weighed using a weighing machine in grams. The duration of surgery (resection time) in minutes, and the volume of 1.5% glycine used during the surgery were also recorded. The resection time was calculated as the duration between the first cut on the prostate until the insertion of the 3-way Foley catheter. Throughout the procedure, all patients were closely monitored for early signs of TURP syndrome, like seeing flashing lights or other visual disturbances, facial warmth, and prickling sensations (19). Preoperative serum sodium levels and MMSE scores, as well as those after the 1st hour and 6th hour postoperatively, were also noted.

Statistical Analysis

The data was entered into MS Excel 2007, and further analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0. Categorical variables were analysed using percentages, while continuous variables were analysed by calculating the mean±standard deviation. The t-test was used for analysing numerical data, and the Chi-square test was applied for categorical data. A significance level of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In the present prospective cohort study, conducted on 100 male patients posted for TURP surgery under spinal anaesthesia, all the patients’ preoperative laboratory and hemodynamic parameters were normal. In this study, out of 100 subjects, the majority of the study subjects (33%) underwent TURP surgery at the age of 66-70 years, and the majority of the subjects belonged to ASA physical status II. The mean age was 69.3 years (Table/Fig 1).

In the present study, the mean HR, MAP, SpO2, and RR were comparable in the study subjects intraoperatively during specified time periods. There was no statistically significant difference in intraoperative hemodynamic parameters among the study subjects (p>0.05) (Table/Fig 2).

Serum sodium before surgery: In the present study population, no preoperative serum sodium abnormalities were detected that could lead to TURP syndrome, except in 2% of the population. The majority of the study subjects’ serum sodium levels fell within the normal (136-140 mmol/L) range (Table/Fig 3).

Duration of surgery (resection time): On analysing the distribution of surgery duration, the majority of the study subjects (30%) were clustered in the 46-55 minutes group. However, 95% of the study population fell within the normal range of resection time. The mean duration of surgery was 45.6 minutes. Only 5% of the study population exceeded the normal resection time for prostate gland resection (Table/Fig 4).

The majority of the study subjects (59%) required a volume of 15001 to 20000 mL of 1.5% glycine. The mean irrigation volume was 18480±3444.3 mL for a mean resection of the prostate of 37.8±1.3 gm. Within the study population, 31% and 10% required more than 20000 mL and less than 15000 mL of glycine volume, respectively (Table/Fig 5).

The present study showed that the mean serum sodium levels before surgery and at post-op 1st hour and 6th hour were compared. There was a decrease in the serum sodium levels at the post-op 1st hour and 6th hour, and this difference was statistically significant (p<0.0001) (Table/Fig 6).

Since, the mean MMSE score before surgery and at post-op 1st and 6th hour were the same, it was not possible to test for a significant difference between them (Table/Fig 7).

The mean values of the MMSE score measured at the preoperative stage, at post-op 1st hour, and 6th hour were compared for the duration of surgery that differed with respect to the time taken for the surgeries.

However, the difference in MMSE scores with the duration of surgery at the preoperative stage, as well as at the 1st and 6th hour post-op, was not statistically significant (p=0.4234) (Table/Fig 8).

The mean values of MMSE scores measured at the preoperative stage, as well as at the 1st and 6th hour post-op, were compared with serum sodium levels classified as <135 mmol/L, 135-140 mmol/L, and >140 mmol/L. However, it was observed from the above table that the MMSE score did not vary with the serum sodium levels, and the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.3423) (Table/Fig 9).

Regarding the correlation of the duration of surgery with the postoperative serum sodium levels at the 1st and 6th hour, there was a significant weak negative association between them (p=0.01) (Table/Fig 10).

Similarly, when correlating the irrigation volume with the post-op serum sodium levels at the 1st and 6th hour, there was a significant weak negative association between them (p=0.01) (Table/Fig 11).

Discussion

The POCD is an illness that has been poorly characterised but recognised as a serious concern in elderly people undergoing anaesthesia for decades (20). Research suggests that approximately a quarter of elderly individuals who undergo major surgery will experience a noticeable decline in cognition, with 50 percent of these patients experiencing long-term impairment. TURP syndrome involves irregularities in the heart, brain, electrolytes, and metabolism (21). The occurrence of TURP syndrome is related to factors such as the type of irrigating fluid, operation time, patient position, prostate size, fluid bag height, surgeon experience, and intra-prostatic vasopressin injection (22).

In the present study, most of the study subjects fall under ASA physical status II (79%), and 33% of the study subjects underwent TURP surgery in the age group of 66-70 years. The mean age was 69.3 years (Table/Fig 1). A study by Xue P et al., documented that old age (mean age was 74.84±6.39 years), ASA physical status II patients, and pain intensity after surgery were important risk factors for the development of delirium in patients undergoing TURP (17). Similar to the present study, studies conducted by Chi YL et al., Bhatta PN et al., and Uddin MH et al., observed that the mean age of the study population was 67.15±9.96, 68.93±10.34, and 64.5±9.86 years, respectively (23),(24),(25).

In comparing the mean changes in serum sodium levels, a significant decrease was observed in the postoperative 1st and 6th-hour serum sodium levels (135.9±1.6 mmol/L, 134.4±1.4 mmol/L, respectively) compared to the preoperative serum sodium level among the patients (138.1±1.5 mmol/L) (p=0.0001) (Table/Fig 6). Similar results were also found in Gupta K et al.,’s study, which showed a statistically significant reduction in postoperative serum sodium (130.3 mmol/L) compared to the preoperative level (141.2 mmol/L) (p=0.0001) (26). Therefore, they concluded that the significant reduction in postoperative serum sodium could potentially be a cause of TURP syndrome, leading to POCD. Studies conducted by Aziz W et al., Pasha MT et al., and Meena R et al., also reported similar results to the present study, indicating statistically significant changes in serum sodium levels at the 1st and 6th hours after surgery (9),(27),(28). None of the patients exhibited any signs or symptoms of TURP syndrome postoperatively. However, Bhatta PN et al.,’s study showed that the postoperative 1st hour and 6th-hour sodium concentrations in both groups decreased from 138.8 to 135.06 mmol/L, but this reduction was not statistically significant (p=0.95) (24). The results of this study differed from the current study. The MMSE score did not vary significantly with the serum sodium levels (p=0.3423). Therefore, this prospective cohort study concluded that POCD was not common in TURP syndrome patients with a significant reduction in postoperative serum sodium.

According to the present study, the mean resection time was 45.6 minutes (Table/Fig 4), and none of the patients developed TURP syndrome. Aziz W et al., Bhatta PN et al., Gupta K et al., and Meena R et al.,’s studies showed similar mean resection times of 45 to 55 minutes, 42.5±20.04 minutes, 38.75±7.31 minutes, and 40.18 minutes, respectively, which align with the findings of the present study (9),(24),(26),(28). However, Uddin MH et al.,’s study reported a mean resection time of 63.80 minutes, which contradicted the present study, but none of the patients exhibited any signs or symptoms of TURP syndrome postoperatively (25). The difference in MMSE score with the duration of surgery at the preoperative stage, 1st hour post-op, and 6th hour post-op was not statistically significant (p=0.4234) (Table/Fig 8). Thus, the present study concluded that POCD was unlikely to occur within six hours postoperatively for resection times less than 45 minutes.

The distribution of irrigation volume (1.5% Glycine) was analysed. The mean irrigation volume was 18,480±3,444.3 mL. In the present study, 59% of the study population required 15 to 20 L of Glycine (Table/Fig 5). Studies conducted by Aziz W et al., Bhatta PN et al., and Uddin MH et al., reported mean irrigant volumes of 12.08 L, 23.27±9.02 L, and 23.55±15.20 L, respectively, compared to the present study’s volume of 18.4±3.4 L (9),(24),(25). After the TURP surgery, the mean weight of the resected prostate tissue was 37.8±1.3 grams, which was similar to the findings of Aziz W et al., and Bhatta PN et al., In those studies, the weight of the resected prostate was greater in the sterile water group (41.25±17.64 g) compared to the Glycine group (35.25±11.71 g) and (41.49±34.46 g versus 15.33±9.74 g), respectively, but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.093) (9),(24). Uddin MH et al., reported a mean weight of the resected tissue as 63.80 g, which differed from the present study, and there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative serum sodium levels (25).

An analysis of the MMSE scores before and after surgery showed no significant difference in the mean scores. The mean MMSE score before surgery was 27.6±0.8, and after surgery, it was also 27.6±0.8, which was statistically insignificant and comparable (Table/Fig 7). A study by Xue P et al., found a similar preoperative and postoperative MMSE score of 27.86±1.76 (17), which aligns with the findings of the present study. This prospective study demonstrated that the duration of prostate resection did not significantly affect MMSE scores in the preoperative, postoperative 1st and 6th hour, suggesting that Postoperative Cognitive Decline (POCD) was unlikely when the prostate resection time was less than 60 minutes (p=0.4234) (Table/Fig 8). Similar results were reported by Kotekar N et al., where the duration of surgery had no significant impact (p=0.97) (29). However, S¸eker TY et al., observed a significant decrease in MMSE scores from preoperative to postoperative (72 hr) period (p<0.001), and Aytaç I et al., found significantly lower postoperative (24th hour) MMSE scores compared to preoperative scores in the general anaesthesia group (p=0.003) (30),(31).

Regarding the correlation between cognitive scores and serum sodium levels, the present study did not find any significant difference in the mean MMSE scores at preoperative, postoperative 1st and 6th hour (p=0.3423) (Table/Fig 9). However, there was a significant negative but weak association between the duration of surgery and postoperative serum sodium levels at the 1st and 6th hour (p=0.01) (Table/Fig 10). Furthermore, a weak association was observed between irrigation volume and postoperative 1st and 6th hour serum sodium levels (p=0.01) (Table/Fig 11).

In a study by Wioletta M et al., it was indicated that older patients experienced greater disturbance of cognitive function in the MMSE test. Additionally, the study demonstrated that higher education levels were associated with lower cognitive disturbance measured by the MMSE test (32).

Central neuraxial block was recommended over general anaesthesia as it allows for early recognition of symptoms and signs of TURP syndrome. Regional anaesthesia may also help reduce the risk of postoperative venous thrombosis. Clinical trials have found no difference between regional and general anaesthesia in terms of blood loss, postoperative cognitive function, or mortality [18,24].

Limitation(s)

The study has several limitations, one of which is that it was conducted at a single center. However, most notably, the study was not blinded, and the psychometric assessment was subjective. The prolonged postoperative decline was self-reported. The findings should be seen as a promising aspect that needs investigation in larger populations with different co-morbidities among the patients, and the utility of different irrigation solutions should be assessed. To generalise the results of the study to a larger population, the above concern needs to be addressed, and further studies should be conducted along similar lines.

Conclusion

In the present study, none of the patients developed cognitive dysfunction in the postoperative period after undergoing TURP surgeries under spinal anaesthesia. It was also observed that the reduction in serum sodium levels was directly proportional to the volume of irrigation fluid used and the duration of the procedure. Glycine was used as an irrigant fluid without significant complications when the duration of surgery was kept to less than 45 minutes.

References

1.
Nilsson A, Hahn RG. Mental status after transurethral resection of the prostate. Eur Urol. 1994;26(1):01-05. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Haan J, van Kleef JW, Bloem BR, Zwartendijk J, Lanser JB, Brand R, et al. Cognitive function after spinal or general anaesthesia for transurethral prostatectomy in elderly men. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(6):596-600. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India. https://mospi.gov.in/web/mospi/reports-publications.
4.
BPH: Surgical management Urology Care Foundation website. www.urologyhealth. org External link. Updated July 2013 Accessed July 29, 2014.
5.
Park S, Ryu JM, Lee M. Quality of life in older adults with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Healthcare (Basel). 2020;8(2):158. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Leslie SW, Chargui S, Stormont G. Transurethral Resection of the Prostate. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2023 Jan.
7.
Kulshreshtha KD, Ranjeetha T, Naresh GT. A comparative study of ‘sterile water’ versus ‘glycine (1.5%)’ as irrigation fluid in transurethral resection of prostate. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2017;05(05):21454-62. [crossref]
8.
Kulkarni SG. Association of irrigation fluid used and serum electrolyte changes in Trans Ureteral Resection of Prostate (Turp) at Dr. Hedgewar Rugnalaya, Aurangabad. Anaesth Med Pract J. 2019;4:133.
9.
Aziz W, Ather MH. Frequency of electrolyte derangement after transurethral resection of prostate: Need for postoperative electrolyte monitoring. Adv Urol. 2015;2015:415735. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Tai S, Xue L, Zhang L, Fan S, Liang C. Preoperative risk factors of postoperative delirium after transurethral prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(3):4569-74.
11.
Borchers F, Spies CD, Feinkohl I, Brockhaus WR, Kraft A, Kozma P, et al. Methodology of measuring postoperative cognitive dysfunction: A systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2021;126(6):1119-27. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Guo Y, Jia P, Zhang J, Wang X, Jiang H, Jiang W. Prevalence and risk factors of postoperative delirium in elderly hip fracture patients. J Int Med Res. 2016;44(2):317-27. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Liu Y, Xiao W, Meng LZ, Wang TL. Geriatric anaesthesia-related morbidity and mortality in China: Current status and trend. Chin Med J (Engl). 2017;130(22):2738-49. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Inan G, Ozkose Satirlar Z. A clinical review of the consequences of anaesthesia and surgery in the elderly brain: The dark side of the moon. Turk Geriatri Derg. 2018;21(1):87-99. [crossref]
15.
Dinc B, Yilmaz VT, Aslan M, Aycan IO, Kiraz N, Kisaoglu A, et al. Serum levels of S100β, neuron-specific enolase, glial fibrillary acidic protein in kidney transplant recipients and donors: A prospective cohort study. Transplant Proc. 2021;53(7):2227-33. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Zhang L, Yang Y, Gao J. Cognitive assessment tools for mild cognitive impairment screening. J Neurol. 2021;268(5):1615-22. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Xue P, Wu Z, Wang K, Tu C, Wang X. Incidence and risk factors of postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate: A prospective cohort study. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016;12:137-42. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Panovska Petrusheva A, Kuzmanovska B, Mojsova M, Kartalov A, Spirovska T, Shosholcheva M, et al. Evaluation of changes in serum concentration of sodium in a transurethral resection of the prostate. Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2015;36(1):117-27. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
George C, Haque PD, Mammen K. Incidence, clinical manifestations and outcome of TUR (transurethral resection) syndrome in patients undergoing TURP under Spinal anaesthesia. Int Surg J. 2017;5(1):243-47. [crossref]
20.
Detweiler MB. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction: What anesthesiologists know that would benefit geriatric specialists. J Geriatr Med Gerontol. 2018;4(1):038. Doi:10.23937/2469-5858/1510038. [crossref]
21.
Rundshagen I. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014;111(8):119-25. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Kumar V, Vineet K, Deb A. TUR syndrome- A report. Urol Case Rep. 2019;26:100982. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Chi YL, Li ZS, Lin CS, Wang Q, Zhou YK. Evaluation of the postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients with general anaesthesia. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017;21(6):1346-54.
24.
Bhatta PN, Yadav UK, Raya A, Yadav AP, Karki RK. Comparison of glycine versus sterile water use in Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP): A cross-sectional study. Medphoenix. 2021;6(2):64-67. [crossref]
25.
Uddin MH, Chowdhury MGM, Rahman MM. A 1.5% glycine vs 5% glucose irrigant during TURP on serum electrolytes & TUR syndrome which one is better? Bangladesh Journal of Urology, 2022;24(1):09-13. [crossref]
26.
Gupta K, Rastogi B, Jain M, Gupta P, Sharma D. Electrolyte changes: An indirect method to assess irrigation fluid absorption complications during transurethral resection of prostate: A prospective study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2010;4(3):142-46. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Pasha MT, Khan MA, Jamal Y, Wahab F, Naeemullah XX. Postoperative complications with glycine and sterile distilled water after transurethral resection of prostate. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2015;27(1):135-39.
28.
Meena R, Maranna H, Bains L, Lal P, Sawant G. Biochemical changes using sterile water and 1.5% glycine in TURP: A randomized study. MAMC J Med Sci. 2020;6(2):81-89. [crossref]
29.
Kotekar N, Kuruvilla CS, Murthy V. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly: A prospective clinical study. Indian J Anaesth. 2014;58(3):263-8. Doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.135034. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Tekdös¸ S¸ eker Y, Pektas¸ Y, Özel Bilgi D, Sertçakacilar G. Cognitive dysfunction in older patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: Analysis of demographic, clinical, and intraoperative risk factors. Med J Bakirkoy. 2021;17(3):190-96. [crossref]
31.
Aytaç I, Güven Aytaç B, Demirelli G, Kayar Çalili D, Baskan S, Postaci A, et al. Comparison of postoperative cognitive decline using the mini-mental state examination and montreal cognitive assessment after minor elective surgery in elderly. Cureus. 2021;13(10):e18631. [crossref]
32.
Wioletta MD, Sebastian D, Andrzej B. Assessment of selected cognitive processes in elderly patients after urologic surgery. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2016;50(3):163-71.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63763.18519

Date of Submission: Feb 25, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Apr 08, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jul 06, 2023
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 04, 2023
• Manual Googling: Apr 28, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jul 01, 2023 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com