Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 43388

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : October | Volume : 17 | Issue : 10 | Page : SC01 - SC05 Full Version

Profile of Acute Poisoning in Adolescents from Southern India: A Prospective Cohort Study


Published: October 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/58861.18536
MR Bhanuprakash, K Shruthi, V Sivakumar, Sushma Veeranna Sajjan, M Lakshmi, Mallesh Kariyappa

1. Senior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Physiology, St. Peters Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Hosur, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 5. Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 6. Professor and Head, Department of Paediatrics, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sushma Veeranna Sajjan,
Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru-560002, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: sushma.sajjan@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Poisoning in children is an important paediatric emergency and a worldwide problem. Poisonings from intentional substance abuse, as well as unintentional toxic exposures, remain significant health concerns for hospital emergency admissions. Understanding the precipitating causes and providing timely counseling play a key role in preventing intentional poisoning in adolescents.

Aim: To study the profile of acute self-poisoning in adolescents and factors associated with poisoning.

Materials and Methods: A hospital-based prospective cohort study was conducted at Vanivilas Hospital, which is affiliated with Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute in Bengaluru, India. The study duration was from November 2018 to June 2020. The study included 100 adolescents, aged 10-18 years, who were admitted with a history of poisoning during the 18-month study period. Informed consent was obtained, and participants were followed-up until discharge. Data was collected using a proforma that included demographic details, information about poisoning, examination findings, investigations, and treatment given. The data was analysed using descriptive statistics, and the Chi-square test was used to determine associations between variables.

Results: The mean age of the study participants was 15.48 years. The maximum number of cases, 53 (53%), were seen in the 13-16 years age group, followed by 36 (36%) in the age group of 17-18 years, and 11 (11%) in the age group 10-12 years. There were 33 (33%) male children and 67 (67%) female children. In the present study, 43 (43%) children belonged to the insecticide group, 30 (30%) to the drugs group (most of them were in combination), 14 (14%) to the household group, 4 (4%) belonged to both the plant and unknown group, and 2 (2%) belonged to the corrosive, and 1 (1%) each for herbicide, hydrocarbon, and metal groups. A total of 87 (87%) cases were discharged after completion of treatment, 8 (8%) cases were discharged against medical advice, and the mortality rate was 5 (5%). The majority of the cases, 79 (79%), consumed poison as an impulsive act secondary to conflicts among family members.

Conclusion: The present study found that acute poisoning in adolescents is mostly intentional, with insecticides being the most commonly implicated agents.

Keywords

Childhood emergencies, Insecticides, Suspected suicides

Worldwide, intentional poisoning is one of the important causes of mortality and morbidity (1). Exposure to agrochemicals, medicines, and environmental agents is the major cause of poisoning. Acute poisoning in children is a ubiquitous problem and an important paediatric emergency. According to a report published by the World Health Organisation (WHO), 13% of total poisoning cases were reported among paediatric and adolescent age groups (2). Poisoning accounts for 1-6% of bed occupancy in children’s hospitals and 3.9% in Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICU) in India (3),(4). Poisoning is predominantly accidental, particularly in children under five years old, but it might be increasingly self-inflicted in older children (5).

In recent times, there has been a shift in the trend of poisoning among adolescents, with the rise of suicidal poisoning compared to accidental poisoning. This is a matter of serious concern. Common reasons for intentional poisoning include distress due to relationship failures, conflicts with intimate partners or parents, examination stress, emotional disturbances, and chronic diseases (6). The WHO estimates that 0.3 million people die every year due to various poisoning agents (7). Acute pesticide poisoning is one of the most common causes of intentional deaths worldwide (8).

High doses of analgesics, tranquilizers, and antidepressants are commonly used agents for intentional poisoning in industrialised countries (9). In middle- and low-income countries, including the Asian region, agricultural pesticides are commonly used for self-poisoning, particularly in rural areas, due to their easy availability. The fatality range for such cases is 10-20% (10). Pesticides are readily available and commonly used by individuals to end their lives in stressful situations (11).

While there is data available from developed countries about the profile of poisoning in children, there are few studies from resource-poor countries such as India (12),(13),(14). There are also only a few studies from Southern India (15),(16),(17). Bangalore, a district in South India, has agriculture as the major occupation in rural areas. Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute is a tertiary care, multispecialty teaching hospital that caters to the health requirements of both urban and rural populations. Many rural patients are admitted to the emergency department of this hospital due to poisoning. Therefore, there was a need to understand the clinical, aetiological, and demographic background of poisoning in children, including the type of poison, manner of poisoning, duration between poisoning and presentation to the hospital, duration of hospital and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, prereferral treatment, and treatment provided, in adolescent children admitted with poisoning in the paediatric emergency ward and PICU at Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

With this background, the present study was conducted to study the profile of acute poisoning in adolescents and associated factors that may help in prevention and treatment. The secondary objective was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of these children with respect to age, gender, ICU stay, and the use of antidotes.

Material and Methods

A hospital-based prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Paediatrics at Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India, during an 18-month study period from November 2018 to June 2020. Approval and clearance were obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC), and patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study after obtaining written consent from parents or informed assent from children.

Inclusion criteria: Children aged 10-18 years with a history of acute poisoning, admitted to PICU and paediatric emergency department, were included in the study after obtaining informed written consent.

Exclusion criteria: Patients or caregivers who refused to give informed consent, cases of animal poisoning (such as snake bites, scorpion stings, and other poisonous bites), and food poisoning were excluded from the study.

Sample size: The sample size for the study was calculated using a proportion formula based on data indicating that adolescents constitute approximately 21% of the Indian population, with a 95% confidence level. A total of 100 samples were finally included in the study.

Formula: Z2 * P * (1-P)/d2

where n=sample size,
Z=statistic for a level of confidence (1.96 for a 95% confidence level),
P=expected prevalence or proportion, and
d=precision.
A total of 100 adolescents aged 10-18 years with a history of acute poisoning were included in the study.

Study Procedure

After obtaining approval and clearance from the IEC, the patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study after obtaining their informed consent. A detailed clinical history was taken, and a physical examination was conducted for each study subject using a predesigned and prestructured proforma. Data were collected using a specially designed proforma that documented socio-demographic details, type of agent, route of exposure, reasons, and precipitating factors for suicide, time of arrival to the hospital after poison exposure, clinical presentation at the time of admission, treatment, immediate outcome, and associated psychiatric illness. Necessary investigations were performed based on the type of poisoning, including complete blood haemogram, renal function test, liver function test, chest X-ray, electrocardiography, echocardiogram, urine routine, ultrasound abdomen, cholinesterase level, Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) analysis, serum calcium, serum electrolytes. Treatment was administered according to the standard protocol, and outcomes were noted. The Modified Kuppusamy classification was used to determine the socio-economic status and educational status of parents (18). All patients enrolled in the study were discussed with a qualified psychiatrist in the department, and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID) (19) standardised diagnostic interview was used to classify psychiatric disorders.

Statistical Analysis

The collected data was entered into Microsoft Excel and analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0. The data was statistically analysed using descriptive statistics, including mean, median, standard deviation, and Interquartile Range (IQR). Percentages, tables, and graphs were used where applicable. The Chi-square test was employed to determine the association between variables such as age, gender, type of poison, mode and cause of consumption, ICU stay, antidote, prereferral treatment, and outcome. A significance level of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In this study, the maximum number of cases, 53 (53%), were seen in the 13-16 years age group, as depicted in (Table/Fig 1). The minimum age was 11 years, and the maximum age was 18 years, with a Mean±SD age of 15.48±1.761 years. Out of the 100 cases, 33 (33%) were male children, and 67 (67%) were female children. Among the cases, 54 (54%) were residing in an urban area, and 46 (46%) were from a rural area.

Most of the parents of children, 37 (37%) of them, had not gone to school. 27 (27%) had studied up to middle school, 13 (13%) up to the primary level, 11 (11%) up to the high school level, 10 (10%) up to the intermediate level, and 2 (2%) of the parents were graduates among the parents of the 100 poisoning cases. In the present study, the maximum, 82 (82%), children belonged to the upper-lower socio-economic status, followed by 16 (16%) in the lower-middle class, and 1 (1%) each in the upper-middle and lower class.

In the present study, 43 (43%) children belonged to the insecticide group, among which organophosphate poisoning was the most common agent. 30 (30%) were in the drugs group (most of them were in combination), 14 (14%) were in the household group, 4 (4%) were in the plant and unknown group, 2 (2%) belonged to the corrosive group, and 1 (1%) each belonged to the herbicide, hydrocarbon, and metal group, as shown in (Table/Fig 1).

Agents of Poisoning

Mode of poisoning: Suicidal attempts were the most common mode of poisoning observed in 84 (84%) children, followed by accidental consumption in 16 (16%) children.

Reason for consumption of poison: In this study, (Table/Fig 2) precipitating/triggering factors for consumption were interfamilial conflicts between family members, observed in 79 (79%) children. Accidental consumption was reported in 16 (16%) children, and other factors were less commonly seen in 5 (5%) children.

Route of poisoning: Oral ingestion was the only route of poisoning observed in all 100 (100%) children in this study.

Prereferral treatment: In this study, prereferral treatment in the form of gastric lavage, atropine, medication, oxygen, etc., was given to 74 (74%) children. 26 (26%) children did not receive prereferral treatment. The age-wise distribution of prereferral treatment received is depicted in (Table/Fig 3). With a p-value of 0.226, no significant association was found between age and prereferral treatment.

The duration between poisoning and presentation: In this study, most of the children, i.e., 48 (48%), reached the hospital within 7-24 hours, and 41 (41%) children reached the hospital within 1-6 hours. Five (5%) reached the hospital within one hour, and only six (6%) of them reached the hospital more than 24 hours after poisoning. Regarding the mode of presentation, 42 (42%) cases presented with vomiting, followed by 17 (17%) cases of abdominal pain. Seventeen (17%) were asymptomatic, 5 (5%) had giddiness, 3 (3%) were unresponsive, and 2 (2%) had altered sensorium and convulsions. One (1%) each presented with fasciculations, neck muscle weakness, jaundice, and acute kidney injury, while the rest presented with non specific neurological complaints.

The mean duration of hospital stay was 5.24 days. In this study, 35 (35%) children were discharged within 4-5 days, 30 (30%) within three days, and 7 (7%) cases required more than 11 days of hospitalisation. Regarding ICU stay and antidote usage, 56 (56%) children were admitted to the ICU, while 44 (44%) were not. Out of 100 cases, only 23 (23%) received a specific antidote, while 77 (77%) received supportive treatment.

In terms of outcome, 87 (87%) cases were discharged after completing treatment, 8 (8%) cases left against medical advice (DAMA), and 5 (5%) children died. The youngest age group (10-12 years) had the lowest mortality rate. The p-value of 0.310 indicated that the relationship between death and age group was not significant (Table/Fig 4).

Among the cases, 67 (67%) were female, and 33 (33%) were male. The fatality rate in female children (n=4) was higher compared to males (n=1). The p-value of 0.483 indicated that the relationship between death and age group was not significant.

Among the 56 cases admitted to the ICU, death occurred in 5 (8.9%) cases, 4 (7.1%) left against medical advice (DAMA), and 47 (83.9%) were discharged home from the ICU. The Chi-square test with a p-value of 0.123 indicated that the relationship between death and ICU stay was not significant. In this study, among the five deaths, one death (20%) occurred in the group that received a specific antidote, while four deaths (80%) occurred in the group where an antidote was not used. The p-value of 0.978 indicated that this difference was not significant (Table/Fig 5).

Outcome

In this study, psychiatric evaluations were conducted for all cases after case stabilisation. Out of the total cases, 79 (79%) were attributed to impulsive acts arising from intrafamilial conflicts, 4 (4%) were due to impulsive acts from other reasons, 16 (16%) were accidental, and 1 (1%) case was attributed to depression.

Discussion

Poisoning is a commonly encountered emergency in children and adults. Unfortunately, poisoning in children is becoming more common due to easy access to poison, temperamental and behavioural changes in children, increased screen media exposure, and unreasonable parental expectations (12). Whether in India or across the world, paediatric acute poisoning is one of the most preventable conditions that can significantly reduce mortality and morbidity among children (15). Present study described the profile of acute poisoning in the adolescent population admitted to a tertiary care teaching hospital.

The present study shows a higher prevalence of acute poisoning in female children (67%) compared to male children (33%). Studies by Kohli U et al., and Gupta SK et al., have shown a higher prevalence of acute poisoning among males (5),(13). The gender imbalance in present study could be due to the preponderance of the urban population, where gender bias is relatively subdued, and most poisoning incidents occur at home, negating the outdoor risk factors favouring poisoning in boys. The female preponderance is comparable to studies conducted by Lalwani S et al., and Basavaraj S and Pushpalatha K (14),(16).

Most of the cases involved parents belonging to the upper-lower-class group (82%) according to the modified Kuppuswamy scale (18). This was likely due to their lower educational status, a greater number of family members, limited storage spaces, and overcrowding in these families. A similar pattern was observed in studies conducted by Vasanthan M et al., Ahamed B et al., and Kajala P et al., (17),(20),(21).

The results of the present study was similar to those of the study by Modi NP et al., regarding the agents of poisoning (22). Most of the cases admitted to our hospital belonged to rural populations and lower socio-economic status, with organophosphorus and household agent compounds being the most common, compared to developed areas where drug poisoning was more prevalent.

In the present study, the most common cause of poisoning was suicide resulting from impulsive acts, followed by accidents. Suicide was the most common mode due to immaturity, fear of parents scolding them for poor school performance, and family disputes. Females had a higher incidence of suicidal poisoning compared to males. Other studies have reported drug ingestion as the most common method of suicidal poisoning (23). Oral ingestion was the most common route. A study conducted by Jesslin J et al., which involved 1045 cases, found that the most common substance used was insecticide, and the most common mode of ingestion was oral, which was comparable to present study (24).

In this study, the majority of the children (74%) received prereferral treatment in the form of atropine, gastric decontamination, oxygen, etc., at surrounding referral hospitals. Among them, 48% reached the hospital within 7-24 hours, and 41% arrived within one to six hours. The duration was shorter for the urban population compared to the rural population. This can be attributed to the longer distance these rural patients had to travel to reach our hospital and their initial treatment at a nearby facility. This finding aligns with the study conducted by Kohli U et al., (5). In present study, 42% of the children presented with vomiting, followed by 17% with abdominal pain, 17% were asymptomatic, 5% experienced giddiness, 3% showed unresponsiveness, and 2% had altered sensorium. Fasciculation, neck muscle weakness, yellowish discolouration of the skin with acute kidney injury, and fasciculation were the least common symptoms. In the majority of cases (74%), treatment was supportive, including gastric lavage, oxygen, intravenous fluids, and other supportive therapies.

Out of the 100 children, only 23% (n=23) received specific antidotes such as atropine, Pralidoxime, Physostigmine, NAC, and Vitamin K when indicated. This observation was consistent with the previous study by Kohli U et al., (5). Most of the patients required a shorter duration of ICU stay compared to cases of insecticide and pesticide poisoning.

The mean duration of hospitalisation was 5.24 days, which was shorter in cases of mortality and Discharge Against Medical Advice (DAMA). This could be due to the poor general condition at presentation. Supportive measures and antidotes were less effective when there was a significant delay in presentation and treatment. The mean duration of hospital stay varied from 0.66 days in a Nigerian study to 3.8 days and 3.78 days in Buthathoki S et al., (25).

In the present study, 87% (n=87) of children with poisoning survived and were discharged, 8% left against medical advice (DAMA), and death occurred in 5 (n=5) cases. The mortality rate in this study was similar to that seen in previous studies (26),(27). The highest number of deaths (n=5) occurred in the insecticide group, particularly with aluminum phosphide, followed by organophosphorus compounds, with a predominance of female patients. The outcome was poor for children admitted to the hospital more than 24 hours after ingesting the poison.

Limitation(s)

The study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital; hence, it may not represent the population in the community. This makes it susceptible to referral bias, and therefore, the study findings cannot be projected at a community level.

Conclusion

This study highlights the morbidity due to acute poisoning in adolescents. The study found that self-poisoning attempts commonly occurred in females due to impulsive acts resulting from conflicts with family and friends. Insecticides were the most frequently used agents. Most cases were symptomatic and required hospitalisation due to the inherent toxicity of the substances involved. Measures need to be taken to prevent accidental and intentional poisoning in adolescents, including strengthening pesticide regulations and providing adolescent counseling.

Author contributions: BMR had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the data analysis. SK assisted with the analysis and interpretation of data. SV contributed to the concept, design, and statistical analysis. SVS participated in drafting the manuscript, critically revising it for important intellectual content, and managing cases. LM managed the treatment of cases and provided critical revision of the manuscript. MK also managed the treatment of cases, critically revised the manuscript, and provided administrative support.

References

1.
Eddleston M, Phillips MR. Self-poisoning with pesticides. Br Med J Publishing Group. 2004;328(7430):42-44. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Peden M, Oyegbite K, Ozanne-Smith J, Hyder AA, Branche C, Rahman AF, et al. World report on child injury prevention. Switzerland: WHO publication. 2008. Pp. 211.
3.
Brata Ghosh V, Jhamb U, Singhal R, Krishnan R. Common childhood poisonings and their outcome in a tertiary care center in Delhi. Indian J Pediatr. 2013;80(6):516-18. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Roy RN, Shrivastava P, Das DK, Saha I, Sarkar AP. Burden of hospitalized pediatric morbidity and utilization of beds in a tertiary care hospital of Kolkata, India. Indian J Community Med. 2012;37(4):252-55. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Kohli U, Kuttiat VS, Lodha R, Kabra SK. Profile of childhood poisoning at a tertiary care centre in North India. Indian J Pediatr. 2008;75(8):791-94. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Chowdhary AN, Banerjee S, Brahma A, Biswas MK. Pesticide poisoning in nonfatal, deliberate self-harm: A public health issue. Indian J Psychiatry. 2007;49(2):117-20. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
London L, Bailie R. Challenges for improving surveillance for pesticide poisoning: Policy implications for developing countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30(3):564-70. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
WHO. The impact of pesticides on health: Preventing intentional and unintentional deaths from pesticide poisoning. 2004.
9.
McClure GM. Suicide in children and adolescents in England and Wales 1970- 1998. Br J Psychiatry. 2001;178:469-74. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Marecek J. Culture, gender, and suicidal behavior in Sri Lanka. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1998;28(1):69-81. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Aaron R, Joseph A, Abraham S, Muliyil J, George K, Prasad J, et al. Suicides in young people in rural southern India. Lancet. 2004;363(9415):1117-18. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Bindu A, Kumar RS, Nanda C. Pattern of poisoning in children, an experience from a teaching hospital in Northern India. JK Sci J Med Edu Res. 2014;16(4):174-78.
13.
Gupta SK, Peshin SS, Srivastava A, Kaleekal T. A study of childhood poisoning at National Poisons Information Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. Journal of Occupational Health. 2003;45(3):191-96. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Lalwani S, Sharma GA, Kabra SK, Girdhar S, Dogra TD. Suicide among children and adolescents in south Delhi (1991–2000). Indian J Pediatr. 2004;71(8):701-03. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Shreekrishna HK, Singi Y, Chandan V, Dabhi D. A study on the profile of poisoning in the paediatric population in a tertiary care teaching hospital of Chitradurga region. Cureus. 2022;14(12):e32369.
16.
Basavaraj S, Pushpalatha K. Clinical profile and outcome of acute pediatric poisoning in urban tertiary care hospital. Journal of Evidence based Medicine and Healthcare. 2015;2(5):459-63. [crossref]
17.
Vasanthan M, James S, Shuba S, Abhinayaa J, Sivaprakasam E. Clinical profile and outcome of poisoning in children admitted to a tertiary referral center in South India. Indian Journal of Child Health. 2015;2(4):187-91. [crossref]
18.
Wani RT. Socioeconomic status scales-modified Kuppuswamy and Udai Pareekh’s scale updated for 2019. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(6):1846-49. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Högberg C, Billstedt E, Björck C, Björck PO, Ehlers S, Gustle LH, et al. Diagnostic validity of the MINI-KID disorder classifications in specialized child and adolescent psychiatric outpatient clinics in Sweden. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19(1):142. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Ahmed B, Fatmi Z, Siddiqui AR, Sheikh AL. Predictors of unintentional poisoning among children under 5 years of age in Karachi: A matched case-control study. Inj Prev. 2011;17(1):27-32. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Kajala P, Jhavar L, Narsaria N, Dubey NK, Sankar J. Childhood poisoning: Clinical profile and outcome. Indian Journal of Emergency Paediatrics. 2011;3(2):55-59.
22.
Modi NP, Dash BK, Satapathy S, Mohanty AK. Trends of acute poisoning in a tertiary care hospital in Odisha, India: A prospective study. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Science. 2014;13(11):12-17. [crossref]
23.
Paudyal BP. Poisoning: Pattern and profile of admitted cases in a hospital in central Nepal. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2005;44(159):92-96.
24.
Jesslin J, Adepu R, Churi S. Assessment of prevalence and mortality incidences due to poisoning in a South Indian tertiary care teaching hospital. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2010;72(5):587-91. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Budhathoki S, Poudel P, Shah D, Bhatta NK, Dutta AK, Shah GS, et al. Clinical profile and outcome of children presenting with poisoning or intoxication: A hospital based study. Nepal Med Coll J. 2009;11(3):170-75.
26.
Manzar N, Saad SMA, Manzar B, Fatima SS. The study of etiological and demographic characteristics of acute house hold accidental poisoning in children– a consecutive case series study from Pakistan. BMC Pediatr. 2010;10:28. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Andiran N, Sarikayalar F. Pattern of acute poisonings in childhood in Ankara: What has changed in twenty years? Turk J Pediatr. 2004;46(2):147-52.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/58861.18536

Date of Submission: Jul 04, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jul 28, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 02, 2023
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 05, 2023
• Manual Googling: Aug 16, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Sep 29, 2023 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com