Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 46095

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : October | Volume : 17 | Issue : 10 | Page : QC14 - QC17 Full Version

Maternal and Foetal Blood Analysis in Term Pregnancies with and without Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Cohort Study


Published: October 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63776.18600
Krishnaveni Bandi, Mamatha Shivanagappa, C Chaithra

1. MBBS Student, JSS Medical College, JSSAHER, Mysuru, Karnataka, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, JSS Medical College, JSSAHER, Mysuru, Karnataka, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, JSS Medical College, JSSAHER, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. C Chaithra,
Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, JSS Medical College, JSSAHER, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: chaithrac@jssuni.edu.in

Abstract

Introduction: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is the development of carbohydrate intolerance of variable severity with onset or first recognition during pregnancy. Iron is essential for the beta cell functioning of the pancreas and glucose homeostasis in adequate quantities. However, excess iron levels can lead to the generation of an increased amount of free radicals, which can cause toxicity to the pancreatic beta cells, leading to insulin resistance by impairing glucose metabolism.

Aim: To compare maternal and foetal blood analysis in term pregnancies with and without GDM.

Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, JSS Medical College and Hospital Research Centre, Mysuru, Karnataka, India, on 120 term pregnant women, with 60 cases of GDM and 60 non GDM controls. Maternal blood and cord blood samples were used to measure Haemoglobin (Hb), Packed Cell Volume (PCV), serum iron, and serum ferritin in the mother and newborn at the time of delivery. Foetal blood analysis was performed in terms of foetal haemoglobin, iron, and ferritin. Birth weight was also measured. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test and Independent t-test, with a p-value <0.05 considered significant.

Results: The serum ferritin level of the mother was higher in GDM cases (mean value 89.47 ng/mL) than in non GDM controls (mean value 47.62 ng/mL), and this difference was statistically significant. Serum ferritin levels in newborns were significantly lower in the GDM group (85.43) compared to the non GDM group (102.71). Mean values of haemoglobin, PCV, and iron levels were not significantly higher in newborns of GDM mothers compared to non GDM mothers.

Conclusion: In GDM, serum ferritin was increased, indicating a marker of inflammation or iron overload, which increases oxidative stress that might affect placental iron transfer and haemoglobin synthesis in the foetus.

Keywords

Cord blood, Haemoglobin, Iron overload, Packed cell volume

GDM is defined as carbohydrate intolerance of variable severity with its onset or first recognition during pregnancy. This definition is applicable whether insulin medication is required for the disease and considers the possibility that previously undetected glucose intolerance existed before the pregnancy (1). The prevalence of GDM is estimated to be approximately 15% worldwide (2). Indian women are at an increased risk of developing GDM compared to Caucasian women by 11-fold (3). Many risk factors are responsible for the development of GDM, like increased Body Mass Index (BMI), increased maternal age, and a family history of diabetes mellitus (4). Based on previous studies in India, it was found that approximately 3.8-21% of pregnant mothers had GDM, with variation across the country (5),(6),(7),(8). With advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of GDM, several studies have reported a significant positive correlation between serum ferritin levels in pregnant mothers and the occurrence of GDM (9),(10). However, clear data regarding the role of serum ferritin as an independent factor in developing diabetes or whether the increase in serum ferritin levels is due to inflammation or increased iron pools among pregnant mothers is still lacking (11).

Ferritin plays a significant role in iron metabolism as one of the major iron storage proteins. It also serves as a marker of inflammation and an acute-phase protein. Serum ferritin levels have been found to be increased in many acute and chronic inflammatory disorders, like diabetes and cardiovascular disorders. Insulin resistance is caused by oxidative stress induced by increased iron stores. Iron, being a transition metal, fluctuates between Fe+2 and Fe+3 and, through the Fenton reaction, can form hydroxyl free radicals from oxygen, which causes cell injury (12),(13). Toxic and dysfunctional effects of iron may eventually result in aberrant metabolism, potentially impacting the risk of GDM. Studies in animals and epidemiology have demonstrated a strong correlation between increased serum ferritin storage and abnormalities of glucose metabolism, as well as a favourable correlation between ferritin and type 2 diabetes mellitus (14),(15).

Iron deficiency is more common among pregnant women. In most developing nations like India, all pregnant women are prescribed iron tablets and consume iron supplements irrespective of their iron status (10). Iron is essential for the beta cell functioning of the pancreas and glucose homeostasis in adequate quantities. However, excess iron levels can lead to the generation of an increased amount of free radicals, which can cause toxicity to the pancreatic beta cells, leading to insulin resistance by impairing glucose metabolism (16). Approximately 90% of all complicated pregnancies are caused by GDM. GDM is linked to adverse outcomes among newborns, including macrosomia, birth injuries, shoulder dystocia, respiratory distress syndrome, hypoglycaemia, hyperbilirubinaemia, and childhood obesity. Women with GDM are also more likely to experience operative delivery, preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, and other potential morbidities (17). Poorly regulated pregnancy-related diabetes mellitus is associated with increased foetal metabolic rate and oxygen consumption, as well as maternal and foetal hyperglycaemia and hyperinsulinaemia. As a result, the intrauterine environment becomes hypoxic, stimulating erythropoiesis and increasing the foetal red cell mass, which raises the newborn’s haemoglobin and PCV levels. If GDM is not properly treated, it can cause problems in the neonate, such as hypoglycaemia, hypocalcaemia, hyperbilirubinaemia, hypomagnesemia, and respiratory distress syndrome (17).

Most studies have focused on serum ferritin levels in early and mid-pregnancy and their association with GDM (18),(19),(20),(21). This study was conducted in term pregnancies with the aim of comparing maternal and foetal blood analysis in term pregnancies with and without GDM.

Material and Methods

This prospective cohort study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, JSS Medical College and Hospital Research Centre, Mysuru, Karnataka, India from December 2020 to December 2022. The study received approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) (JSS/MC/PG/5156/2020-21). Written informed consent was obtained from all enrolled patients.

Inclusion criteria: Participants with term gestation singleton pregnancies with and without GDM, irrespective of maternal age and parity were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Term pregnancies with anaemia (Hb <11 gm%-WHO criteria), Type-1 and Type-2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, seizure disorder, acute or chronic liver disease, COVID-19 infection, history of drug abuse, and multifoetal gestation were excluded from the studys.

Sample size: Based on the incidence of GDM in the pilot study conducted at JSS Hospital, it was found to be 9%. Using this information, the sample size was estimated to be 120, with a 5% allowable error and 95% confidence interval. Purposive sampling technique was used to divide the sample into 60 study subjects in the GDM group and 60 study subjects in the control group. The diagnosis of GDM was made according to the Diabetes in Pregnancy Study group India (DIPSI) criteria (22).

A general physical, systemic, and obstetrics examination was performed, and eligible patients were enrolled in the study. At the time of admission, 3 mL of venous blood sample was drawn from the mother with aseptic precautions, and 3 mL of cord blood was collected from the maternal end of the umbilical cord in a plain vacutainer immediately after delivery. The sample was allowed to stand for 30 minutes to allow the blood to clot, and then it was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes to separate the serum. The serum sample was processed using a fully automated integrated analyser COBAS 6000 Roche.

Maternal blood samples were used to measure Hb%, serum iron, and ferritin levels. Cord blood samples were used to estimate Hb%, PCV, iron levels, and serum ferritin in the newborn. Serum ferritin levels were estimated using the electrochemiluminescence method, and iron levels were measured using the ferrozine method (7),(23).

Statistical Analysis

The data were entered into a Microsoft Excel datasheet and analysed using SPSS version 22.0 software. Categorical data were represented in the form of frequencies and proportions. The significance of the data was tested using the Chi-square test. Continuous data were represented as mean and standard deviation. The significance of the data was tested using an independent t-test. A p-value <0.005 was considered significant.

Results

The mean age in the GDM group was 27.38±5.32 years, and in the non GDM group, it was 27.18±4.76 years. In the GDM group, 35% were primigravida, and 65% were multigravida. In the non GDM group, 43.3% were primigravida, and 56.7% were multigravida (Table/Fig 1).

The mean BMI in the GDM group was 26.56±3.8 kg/m2, and in the non GDM group, it was 24.25±3.3 kg/m2 (p=0.001).

The mean maternal ferritin in the GDM group was 89.47±44.23, and in the non GDM group, it was 47.62±22.45 (Table/Fig 2).

The mean foetal ferritin in the GDM group was 85.43±24.34 ng/mL, and in the non GDM group, it was 102.71±60.2 ng/mL. The mean birth weight in the GDM group was 3.16±0.49 kg, and in the non GDM group, it was 2.94±0.39 kg (Table/Fig 3).

Discussion

In the present study, mean age of study subjects was found to be statistically insignificant between both the groups. In the study done by Sharifi F et al., the mean age of GDM subjects was 30±4.7 years of age and non GDM it was 30±4.9 years of age, in another study done by Inaniya P et al., most of the study subjects in GDM group (46.7%) as well as control group (48%) were aged 26-30 years, followed by 20-25 years, with a statistically insignificant p-value, similar to the findings of present study (19),(20). Soheilykhah S et al., reported a mean age of 29.4±5.4 years among GDM subjects (10). Chen X et al., found a mean age of 22.14±0.13 years among study participants, which was much lower than in present study group (24).

In the present study, parity was found to be statistically insignificant between the GDM and non GDM groups, with multiparous women being more common in both groups (65% in GDM and 56.7% in non GDM subjects). Rajput R et al., Gopalan SK et al., and Kalyani KR et al., reported that nearly 76%, 58.5%, and 76% of subjects with GDM were multiparous, respectively, same as present study findings (21),(25),(26). In this study, the history of diabetes mellitus among family members was found to be much lower in both the GDM and non GDM groups, with an insignificant p-value between the groups.

Rajput R et al., and Gopalan SK and Kalimuthu K, reported a family history of diabetes mellitus in 8.2% and 15.19% of those who developed GDM, respectively (21),(25). Sharifi F et al., found a family history of diabetes in 47% of GDM subjects and 4.6% among the non GDM group, with a statistically significant association, which contrasts with the findings of present study (19).

The mean maternal Hb in the GDM Group was 12.01±0.87, and in the non GDM Group, it was 12.3±1.07. There was no significant difference in the mean maternal Hb between the two groups. Sharifi F et al., reported a mean Hb of 12.8±0.8 in the GDM group and 12.5±0.58 in the non GDM group, with a statistically insignificant p-value (19). Another study by Das A et al., showed that the incidence rate of GDM was significantly greater (44.12%) in the high haemoglobin group (Hb >13 gm/dL) compared to the normal haemoglobin group (10%) (Hb ≤13 gm/dL). Elevated ferritin levels have been suggested to contribute to the development of GDM (6).

In the present study, the mean maternal ferritin in the GDM group was 89.47±44.23, and in the non GDM group, it was 47.62±22.45. There was a significant difference in mean maternal ferritin between the two groups. Soheilykhah S et al., found a 1.4-fold greater risk of developing GDM in women with high ferritin levels compared to those with lower ferritin levels, with a cut-off value of 45 ng/mL (10). Fu S et al., demonstrated a strong relationship between high ferritin levels and heme iron and the risk of GDM in their study (27). Sharifi F et al., identified high blood ferritin concentrations as a separate risk factor for GDM (Table/Fig 4) (6),(9),(19),(20),(28),(29).

The difference in mean ferritin levels between the two groups was found to be statistically significant (p-value <0.001). This indicates that higher ferritin levels greatly increase the risk of GDM. As ferritin is a protein that stores iron, excess iron-induced oxidative stress may lead to insulin resistance. The transition of iron between Fe2+ and Fe3+ and the subsequent Fenton reaction can generate hydroxyl radicals from oxygen, which can damage cells. The accumulation of excess iron in various tissues may result in faulty glucose absorption by muscle, adipocytes, liver, and other cell types, as well as poor insulin signaling in the liver. Therefore, if pregnant women are recommended to take iron supplements regardless of their iron status, it may lead to iron overload and subsequent production of free radicals, which can cause various issues, including GDM.

The mean foetal Hb in the GDM Group was 16.88±6.06 gm%, and in the non GDM Group, it was 15.55±2.08 gm%. The comparison of mean foetal Hb between the two groups was found to be statistically insignificant. Similar results were obtained in the study by Chauhan P et al., where cord blood Hb was 14.4±0.76 in the GDM group and 13.4±0.63 in the non GDM group (7). Baki MA et al., found that foetal Hb (g/dL) was 19.00±1.39 in the GDM group and 17.47±1.6 in the non-GDM group (8). El Raggal NM et al., indicated in their study that both the mother and foetus are vulnerable to developing iron deficiency anaemia among GDM mothers (30). In the same study, foetal serum ferritin was found to be higher in newborns born to mothers with GDM compared to the control group, but the association was statistically insignificant, which contrasts with the findings in this study (30). Hashim JM and Ameer S stated in their study that there was no significant difference between infants of diabetic mothers and the controls regarding PCV, MCV, and RDW (p-value >0.05) (31).

Birth weight was positively correlated with GDM in the study by Yang Y et al., (p-value=0.0002) (32). Gillman MW et al., found that infants whose mothers had GDM had mean birth weights of 3.4 kg for females and 3.6 kg for males on average (33). Jain R et al., found that LBW infants ranged from 9.9-21.9%, and >3.5 kg infants (macrosomia) ranged from 7.2-16.5%, and they also had elevated blood sugar levels, indicating that GDM is linked to higher birth weight in newborns (34). The mean birth weight of infants of diabetic mothers in the study by Baki MA et al., was 3296±62 gm, compared to 2714±32 gm for children of non diabetic mothers (p-value <0.05) (8).

Birth weights were increased in newborns of GDM cases because in diabetes, a higher amount of blood glucose passes through the placenta into foetal circulation, leading to increased birth weight. Serum iron and Hb levels were increased in newborns of the GDM group, which could be due to increased transfer of iron from the mother caused by elevated demands in the foetus of diabetic mothers. Overall, it can be concluded that elevated ferritin levels are associated with an increased risk of developing GDM and can cause increased oxidative stress, which might affect placental iron transfer and foetal Hb synthesis.

Limitation(s)

In this study, measurement of serum ferritin levels was performed at term gestation. However, conducting earlier measurements during the antenatal period would have strengthened the study. Long-term follow-up of neonates was not conducted in this study.

Conclusion

Serum indicators that can predict the probability of developing GDM easily can be routinely utilised to facilitate early diagnosis. In GDM, serum ferritin is elevated, indicating inflammation or iron overload, which increases oxidative stress and may, in turn, affect placental iron transfer and haemoglobin synthesis.

References

1.
Mishra S, Bhadoria AS, Kishore S, Kumar R. Gestational diabetes mellitus 2018 guidelines: An update. J Family Med Prim Care. 2018;7(6):1169-72. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Guariguata L, Linnenkamp U, Beagley J, Whiting DR, Cho NH. Global estimates of the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;103(2):176-85. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Rani PR, Begum J. Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus, where do we stand. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(4):QE01-04. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Dornhorst A, Paterson CM, Nicholls JS, Wadsworth J, Chiu DC, Elkeles RS, et al. High prevalence of gestational diabetes in women from ethnic minority groups. Diabet Med. 1992;9(9):820-25. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Seshiah V, Balaji V, Balaji MS, Paneerselvam A, Kapur A. Pregnancy and diabetes scenario around the world: India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;104 (Suppl 1):S35-38. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Das A, Karmakar S, Bid S, Saha SK. Association of high serum ferritin level in early pregnancy with development of gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective observational study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2021;15(7):19-24. [crossref]
7.
Chauhan P, Gogoi P, Tripathi S, Naik S. Association of maternal serum ferritin level in gestational diabetes mellitus and its effect on cord blood hemoglobin. IJCMR. 2020;7(1):A1-A4. [crossref]
8.
Baki MA, Akhter S, Nahar J, Mohsin F, Khan S. Serum ferritin and red blood cell indices in infants of diabetic mothers. BIRDEM Med J. 2020;10(3):182-86. [crossref]
9.
Poonguzhalai S, Kalyanikutty KP. The relationship between serum ferritin and gestational diabetes mellitus-A cross sectional study. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2019;6(3):342-45. [crossref]
10.
Soheilykhah S, Mojibian M, Jannati Moghadam M. Serum ferritin concentration in early pregnancy and risk of subsequent development of gestational diabetes: A prospective study. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2017;15(3):155-60. PMID: 28580448; PMCID: PMC5447832. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Allen LH. Anaemia and iron deficiency: Effects on pregnancy outcome. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71(5 Suppl):1280S-4S. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Clark CM Jr, Qiu C, Amerman B, Porter B, Fineberg N, Aldasouqi S, et al. Gestational diabetes: Should it be added to the syndrome of insulin resistance? Diabetes Care. 1997;20(5):867-71. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Kell DB, Pretorius E. Serum ferritin is an important inflammatory disease marker, as it is mainly a leakage product from damaged cells. Metallomics. 2014;6(4):748-73.[crossref][PubMed]
14.
Bowers K, Yeung E, Williams MA, Qi L, Tobias DK, Hu FB, et al. A prospective study of pre pregnancy dietary iron intake and risk for gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(7):1557-63. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Liu Q, Sun L, Tan Y, Wang G, Lin X, Cai L. Role of iron deficiency and overload in the pathogenesis of diabetes and diabetic complications. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16(1):113-29. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Georgieff MK, Krebs NF, Cusick SE. The benefits and risks of iron supplementation in pregnancy and childhood. Annu Rev Nutr. 2019;39:121-46. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Ornoy A, Becker M, Weinstein-Fudim L, Ergaz Z. Diabetes during pregnancy: A maternal disease complicating the course of pregnancy with long-term deleterious effects on the offspring: A clinical review. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(6):2965. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Das CC, Sreekala KN, Geetha N. Serum ferritin in gestational diabetes. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2017;5(8):26814-19. [crossref]
19.
Sharifi F, Ziaee A, Feizi A, Mousavinasab N, Anjomshoaa A, Mokhtari P. Serum ferritin concentration in gestational diabetes mellitus and risk of subsequent development of early postpartum diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2010;3:413-19. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Inaniya P, Meena BS, Sharma M, Meena ML, Gera R, Sharma A. A comparative study of the association of serum ferritin level with gestational diabetes mellitus in the department of obstetrics and gynaecology at SMS Medical College & attached group of Hospitals, Jaipur. IJMBS. 2021;5(11):17-19. [crossref]
21.
Rajput R, Yadav Y, Nanda S, Rajput M. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus & associated risk factors at a tertiary care hospital in Haryana. Indian J Med Res. 2013;137(4):728-33.
22.
Diagnosis & Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (2021) by-diabetes in pregnancy study group India (DIPSI). access on: 1/10/2020. Available at: https:// icogonline.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/gcpr/gdm-dipsi-guidline.pdf.
23.
Ward RE, Legako JF. Traditional methods for mineral analysis. Ch. 21. In: Nielsen SS (ed) Food analysis, 5th edn. Springer, New York. 2017. [crossref]
24.
Chen X, Scholl TO, Stein TP. Association of elevated serum ferritin levels and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant women: The Camden study. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(5):1077-82. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Goplalan SK, Kalimuthu K. A retrospective study to assess prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus among those who delivered in Saveetha Medical College and Hospital. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2019;8(9):3475-79. [crossref]
26.
Kalyani KR, Jajoo S, Hariharan C, Samal S. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus, its associated risk factors and pregnancy outcomes at a rural setup in Central India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2014;3(1):219-24. [crossref]
27.
Fu S, Li F, Zhou J, Liu Z. The relationship between body iron status, iron intake and gestational diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(2):e2383. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Jiang R, Manson JE, Meigs JB, Ma J, Rifai N, Hu FB. Body iron stores in relation to risk of type 2 diabetes in apparently healthy women. JAMA. 2004;291(6):711-17. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Soubasi V, Petridou S, Sarafidis K, Tsantali Ch, Diamanti E, Buonocore G, et al. Association of increased maternal ferritin levels with gestational diabetes and intra-uterine growth retardation. Diabetes Metab. 2010;36(1):58-63. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
El-Raggal NM, Abdou RM, Hamza MT, Hasan SM. Effect of maternal diabetes on cord blood concentrations of iron status parameters. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2017;69(3):2109-14. [crossref]
31.
Hashim JM, Ameer S. Cord blood serum ferritin of infants of diabetic mothers. Iranian Journal of Neonatology. 2014;5(1):01-06.
32.
Yang Y, Wang Z, Mo M, Muyiduli X, Wang S, Li M, et al. The association of gestational diabetes mellitus with fetal birth weight. J Diabetes Complications. 2018;32(7):635-42. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Gillman MW, Oakey H, Baghurst PA, Volkmer RE, Robinson JS, Crowther CA. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on obesity in the next generation. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(5):964-68. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Jain R, Davey S, Olejas S, Jain R. A prospective study on impact of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) management on burden of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) in Uttar Pradesh India. Arch Community Med Public Health. 2019;5(1):35-39.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63776.18600

Date of Submission: Feb 26, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 20, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 13, 2023
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 01, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 30, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Sep 01, 2023 (13%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com