Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 47974

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : October | Volume : 17 | Issue : 10 | Page : PC22 - PC27 Full Version

Nutritional Status’ Impact on the Management of Vesical Calculi: A Systematic Review of a Twenty-Two-Year Database


Published: October 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60977.18632
Harshal Madavi, Hemant Chaudhari

1. Junior Resident, Department of Surgery, Shri Bhausaheb Hire Government Medical College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Shri Bhausaheb Hire Government Medical College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Harshal Madavi,
Junior Resident, Department of Surgery, Shri Bhausaheb Hire Government Medical College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: drharshalniar@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Acidogenic diets cause a drop in urinary pH, and increasing features of metabolic syndrome are associated with increased calcium oxalate precipitation. Nowadays, it is well accepted that dietary variables promote the formation of vesical calculi, contributing to the prevalence of vesical stones.

Aim: The aim of this study is to estimate the impact of nutritional status on the management of vesical calculi.

Materials and Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane library, as well as additional sources such as Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov, covering the period from 2001 to 2022. The most important electronic databases were checked, and all types of studies, including expressive studies, trials, commentaries, and editorials, were considered due to the nature of the studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the recommended methodology. A two-part tool was used to address five specific domains: selection bias, performance bias, attrition bias, selective reporting, and other biases. Quality diagnostic accuracy studies were evaluated using a quality assessment tool.

Results: This study included 12 literature sources, of which five were nutrition-based studies and seven were focused on vesical calculi. Dietary modifications and medical treatments were found to be the most important factors in preventing recurrence.

Conclusion: Dietary and medical treatments are of utmost importance in preventing recurrence. As per physician advice for vesical calculi, a proper dietary plan that includes a mineral-rich diet is needed. Consumption of ample fluids is essential for the removal of stones.

Keywords

Prevention, Recurrence, Surgery, Ultrasonography, Urolithiasis

Vesical stones are primarily formed due to urinary stasis and can occur in otherwise healthy individuals without any anatomical or pathophysiological defects in the urinary system. The stones concentrate and solidify in stagnant urine, forming hard lumps. Variations in urine’s degree of saturation, pH, and concentration can disrupt the existing equilibrium, leading to urolithiasis (1). Vesical calculi can be either primary or secondary. Primary stones typically form in sterile urine, originating in the kidney and then passing into the bladder. They may be associated with nutritional deficiencies of vitamin A, magnesium, phosphate, and vitamin B6 (2),(3). In contrast to secondary vesical calculi, which form under abnormal upper urinary tract conditions, primary vesical calculi form in the bladder under normal conditions. Primary vesical calculi are most commonly observed in malnourished children (4).

Previous research has indicated that childhood urinary stones predominantly occur as bladder calculi (5). It was commonly believed that these were endemic Bladder Stones (BS). In his groundbreaking investigations conducted in India in 1931, McCarrison R introduced the concept of a shifting aetiopathology of stone disease and demonstrated that nutritional deficiencies remained the primary cause (6). Stone formation was associated with a deficiency of vitamin A in the diet. Although the frequency of stones in India remained high during childhood, he claimed that malnutrition was the cause of BS both in India and the UK (7).

The role of a dietitian is crucial in the management of nephrolithiasis and vesical calculi. Dietary evaluation is essential for treating and preventing stone formation. The dietitian should assess dietary calcium intake, oxalate intake, sodium intake, protein intake (both animal and plant), dietary supplements, and fluid intake to determine whether they promote or inhibit stone formation. Accurate measurement of fluid intake is particularly important (8).

Many researchers studying vesical stones have linked dietary factors to stone development. Children from the Ahmadnagar region in India with vesicle stones consume a diet high in cereals and low in animal proteins, particularly milk, according to epidemiological literature on dietary intake (9).

Generally, the diet’s protein consumed from animals is less than 25%. Cereals such as whole wheat flour, millets, and pulses like black gram, red gram, and green gram are among the most popular cereals (10).

According to the majority of studies (11),(12), consuming whole wheat flour as a staple food leads to the production of urine with a high Specific Gravity (SG), increased excretions of calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, oxalate, and uric acid, and supersaturation of urine with uric acid. These effects are particularly noticeable in Indian children with kidney stones (11).

Children have a higher uric acid/creatinine ratio, which decreases as they grow older. Due to the increased saturation and precipitation of uric acid in children who primarily consume wheat as their main source of nutrition, they are more likely to develop kidney stones (12).

Vesical stones are more common in areas with mild to moderate Protein Energy Malnutrition (PEM) compared to areas with severe PEM, according to a study of vesical stones in Indian children. Numerous publications have reported on the chemical analysis of renal and vesical stones from various endemic areas of India (13),(14),(15),(16). The main component of urinary calculi is calcium oxalate, which is also supported by numerous research studies from India (17).

Over the past 20 years, there has been a significant shift in the treatment of ureteric stones. The most effective diagnostic procedures continue to be intravenous urography and conventional diagnostic instruments such as Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder (KUB) radiograph. The majority of ureteric stones dissolve naturally without the need for surgery. Historically, open ureterolithotomy was the most common surgical stone therapy. Today, available treatment options include stenting, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy, laparoscopic ureterolithotomy, and occasionally open ureterolithotomy (18).

The management of stones has been transformed by the use of ESWL, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and endoscopic technologies (19). Two-thirds of all urinary calculi brought to a doctor’s attention are ureteric stones (20). However, the nutritional condition and eating habits of patients with specific vesical calculi are not well understood. Therefore, this present systematic review aims to evaluate the nutritional status and management of vesical calculi.

Material and Methods

The protocol for this study was based on the approved reporting articles for systematic review (PRISMA-P) declaration, and all changes were properly reported. The Cochrane handbook and the PRISMA statement were followed in conducting and reporting this systematic review, respectively. However, it is important to note that the review was not registered. The literature search included various computerised databases such as MEDLINE, Google Scholar, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus. The search terms used included keywords related to nutritional status and the management of vesical calculi, such as “Vesical calculi,” “Management of vesical calculi,” “Diet for prevention of vesical calculi,” and “Management of stone diseases.” The search was limited to publications in English. Notably, the search syntax was customised for each database based on their unique requirements and instructions. Several eligibility factors, including inclusion and exclusion criteria, were considered during the study selection.

Inclusion criteria:

1. Articles published between 2001 and 2022.
2. Studies focusing on the management of vesical calculi in patients with documented nutritional status.
3. Human clinical studies.
4. Full-text articles.
5. English language literature.

Exclusion criteria:

1. Non-English language literature.
2. Letters, book chapters.
3. Short communications.
4. Conference articles.
5. Patents.
6. Duplicate articles.
7. Studies involving individuals with frequent or widespread vesical calculi, as this condition may have had an impact on their dietary habits.

After retrieving articles from the databases, they were organised in an Excel sheet, and duplicates were eliminated. Two authors then independently assessed the abstract of each article, and a selected group of papers was chosen for full-text reading. Finally, a final selection of relevant research was made independently by the authors.

Statistical Analysis

Quality assessment of individual studies was conducted using the domain-based calculation method recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The following domains were examined: bias resulting from randomisation procedures, bias arising from deviations from the proposed interventions, bias due to lack of outcome data, bias in the evaluation of outcomes, and bias in the selection of reported results (20). The assessment of “Risk of Bias” was performed using Review Manager Software Version 5.3, developed by The Cochrane Collaboration (Software Update, Oxford, UK).

Results

The present systematic review yielded 1,036 articles in the initial search. Fourteen additional articles were identified from cross-references, resulting in a total of 1,050 articles. From these, 537 duplicate or triplet publications were removed, leaving 513 studies for screening. On detailed screening, 367 articles were excluded due to missing parameters in 189 articles and irrelevance in 62 articles. Fifty-eight articles were not original studies. Based on the inclusion criteria, 146 text articles were evaluated. However, during the review of full-text articles, some were removed due to reasons such as small sample sizes, incomplete/irrelevant data, case reports/case studies, and letters to the editor. Finally, after a thorough screening and analysis, a total of 12 studies were included in this systematic review (Table/Fig 1). The articles ranged in date from 2001 to 2022.

In this study, 12 literature sources were included, with five studies focusing on nutrition and seven studies on vesical calculi management (Table/Fig 2) (21),(22),(23),(24),(25),(26),(27),(28),(29),(30),(31),(32).

Quality evaluation of the included studies was conducted using the Cochrane Collaboration tool in RevMan version 5.4. The risk of bias was assessed based on selection bias, performance bias, attrition bias, selective reporting, and other biases. Each article’s risk was categorised as low, unclear, or high based on these domains and criteria. The risk of bias evaluation for the 12 studies is shown in (Table/Fig 3). All studies exhibited substantial methodological issues in at least one bias category. The most problematic categories included insufficient or non-existent randomisation (11.66% high risk), low outcome assessor blinding (55% of the trials), and unclear risk in 31.66% of the trials (Table/Fig 4).

Dietary factors were evaluated in five studies (21),(23),(24),(25),(32). Meschi et al., revealed that the urinary stone risk profile changes negatively when fruits and vegetables are completely eliminated from normal individuals’ diets, and these changes are only partially offset by a decrease in oxalate (24). Zein-el-Amir et al., demonstrated that an unbalanced diet is the main risk factor for pediatric bladder calculi (25). Sarica et al., calculated the potential impact of the calcium entry blocking agent medication ‘verapamil’ on new stone initiation and/or regrowth of residual fragments after SWL during long-term follow-up (>30 months), and the results opposed the outcomes with satisfactory fluid intake rates (22).

According to data analysed by Borghi et al., and Dussol et al., a normal-calcium diet caused fewer stone recurrences than a low-protein, low-salt diet (21),(23). Similarly, Borghi et al., assessed men with recurring calcium oxalate stones and hypercalciuria. They restricted the intake of animal protein and salt while maintaining a normal calcium intake, which provided higher protection than the conventional low-calcium diet (21).

Regarding the management of vesical calculi, Singh and Kaur divided patients into three groups: the first group underwent transurethral removal of stones employing a nephroscope, the second group underwent transurethral elimination utilising a cystoscope, and the third group underwent percutaneous exclusion with a nephroscope (29). They reported that the removal of stones through the urethra with a nephroscope is a safe and effective procedure that doesn’t cause patient morbidity.

Jagannath et al., evaluated that Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy (URSL) was an alternative procedure for ureteric and vesicoureteric junction calculi. Percutaneous Nephrolithostomy/Push Back Percutaneous Nephrolithostomy (PCNL/PBPCNL) was the treatment alternative for stones at the pelviureteric junction and upper 1/3rd of the ureter with a size >1 cm. The success rate of the surgical process in their study was 80-100%. They demonstrated that westernisation, modern lifestyle, and changes in dietary practices may be to blame for the rising occurrence of stones in younger age groups and the female population. Knowledge about novel methods will enable surgeons to personalise the procedure, increasing the likelihood of success and lowering morbidity (32).

According to Stamtiou KN et al., (2006), extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was conducted on patients who had kidney and urinary stones (31). They claimed that urolithiasis was more common during the course of a person’s lifetime in the rural districts of Thebes, Greece.

In a pilot study conducted by Tondare S et al., (2013) at the Department of Surgery, Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial Medical College and Hospital Dhule (26), a total of 577 patients were included. The study reported that the majority of patients with ureteric calculi present with abdominal pain, and medical therapy is typically used as treatment. Endourological techniques are increasingly being employed as surgical intervention methods, reducing the need for open surgery. With surgical expertise, complications from endourological operations are extremely rare.

Turk C et al., who accompanied the study at the Department of Urology, Rudolfstiftung Hospital, Vienna, Austria (30), described urinary calculi diagnosis, observational management, and medicinal treatment as standard procedures. They utilised low-dose Computed Tomography (CT) to quickly make the diagnosis while limiting radiation exposure. Particularly for stones in the lower pole, active therapy may not be required. Medical Expulsive Therapy (MET) is advised to encourage spontaneous stone ejection.

Malladad et al., (2018) conducted a study at the Department of General Surgery, SDM Medical College and Hospital in Dharwad, Karnataka, India (27). They examined 42 patients with vesical calculi. The study found that males experienced greater effects than females (6:1). The most common symptom was abdominal pain, occurring 71% of the time. Approximately 52% of the patients consumed water from a bore well. Ultrasonography was the most sensitive investigation method used in the study. Surgical intervention was performed in all cases, with transurethral cystolithotripsy using an 80-watt holmium laser being used in 50% of the patients. Open suprapubic cystolithotomy was performed in 29% of the patients, and percutaneous cystolithotripsy was performed in 21% without any complications. The majority of vesical calculi were mixed types, consisting mainly of calcium phosphate, calcium oxalate, and uric acid. The study concluded that vesical calculus is more common in children under the age of 10, and abdominal pain is the most frequently reported symptom. The consumption of hard water increases the risk of developing vesical calculus. Ultrasonography is the preferred method for studying vesical calculus due to its 100% sensitivity.

In a study conducted by Esposito et al., (2021) at the Department of Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy (28), they observed 13 patients and concluded that minimally invasive methods for treating bladder stones in children are safe and efficient. Endourological management was the most cost-effective approach, resulting in a shorter hospital stay, but it was primarily recommended for small stones with a diameter less than 10 mm. Robotic surgery appeared to be a feasible approach for treating larger bladder stones measuring more than 15-20 mm. The use of robot technology allowed for easy suturing, enabling the removal of large stones without crushing them and ensuring secure closure of the bladder wall.

Discussion

The formation of vesical calculi is significantly influenced by dietary variables, and customised food advice based on patients’ metabolism should be provided for nutritional evaluations in order to prevent stone recurrence. Bladder calculi are associated with a variety of urinary compositional abnormalities.

Dietary discretion, physiological metabolic abnormalities, or both can be urinary risk factors. Stone disease is expensive and morbid, and after five years, recurrence rates can reach 30-50%. Therefore, it is crucial to make efforts to prevent stone formation (33). However, a study indicated that increased consumption of dietary fiber did not successfully decrease the recurrence of calcium oxalate calculi (23). Another study by Rotily M et al., showed that patients who consumed dietary fiber did not experience a decrease in calcium oxalate predictive factors, such as calcium or oxalate outputs (34).

(Table/Fig 5) provides a summary of various studies and their outcomes on dietary factors and the occurrence of vesicular calculi and their recurrence.

In this review, most studies did not include biochemical data such as urinary compositions, which would be useful in explaining the biological effect of specific dietary factors on stone development (18),(20),(21),(29).

A recently conducted study by Lin BB et al., investigated a wide range of modifiable lifestyle factors and clarified their association with incident kidney stones by comparing the highest vs lowest categories of exposure (35). Their findings suggested that total fluid intake, water, coffee, tea, alcohol, beer, fruit, vegetables, dietary fiber, dietary potassium, magnesium, and calcium decreased the risk of kidney stones. On the other hand, high Body Mass Index (BMI), total meat intake, animal protein, dietary sodium, spinach, oxalate, fructose, and soda increased the risk. Total and supplemental vitamin C intakes were associated with non-significant risk of renal stones. Supplemental vitamin D and calcium alone increased the risk in observational studies but not in Randomised Control Trials (RCTs). In contrast, co-supplementation conferred the risk in RCTs. No significant associations were found with physical activity, energy intake, dietary vitamin B6, and total vitamin D (35).

Grases F et al., reported that fruits, vegetables, and dietary fiber are essential sources of phytate, which decreases the risk of calculi by inhibiting the urinary crystallisation of calcium salts (36). Additionally, Noori N et al., showed that a Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) style diet non-significantly decreased urine calcium oxalate supersaturation among stone formers with hyperoxaluria compared to an oxalate-restricted diet (37).

Regarding the management of vesicular calculi, another study conducted by Jagannath K et al., demonstrated that for stones located at the pelvi-ureteric junction and the upper third of the ureter with a size greater than one centimeter, PCNL/PBPCNL can be an alternative to URSL (32). The surgical operations performed in their study had a success rate of 80-100%. They suggested that PCNL/PBPCNL is a safe and efficient treatment for the management of ureteric stones. A similar study was conducted for treating urinary reservoir calculi, where Natalin RA et al., combined percutaneous dilation with a laparoscopic trocar (38). The results of certain studies considered indications that calcium channel blocker therapy can be protective in certain models of ischemia-induced acute renal failure. Previous investigations on Mad in Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells demonstrated a protective effect of calcium channel blockers against shockwave-induced tubular dysfunction, as well as high-energy shockwave-induced renal damage in both humans and animal models (37),(38),(39).

Limitation(s)

Information on stone composition was not available, and no association was made with specific types of stones. Biochemical data, such as urinary compositions, were missing. It remained unknown whether the impact of lifestyle factors on stone risk varies by gender due to a paucity of included studies.

Conclusion

The present systematic review concludes that medical and dietary treatments are most important in preventing the recurrence of kidney stones and renal stones. As per physicians’ advice for managing vesicular calculi, a proper dietary plan with a mineral-rich diet is required. Consumption of ample fluids is essential for stone removal. It is important to effectively manage vesicular calculi to achieve better analysis. Surgical and medical treatments are the primary considerations in managing vesicular stones, but dietary modifications are not receiving the attention they deserve in stone treatment. Diet plays a crucial role and has combined effects with other risk factors in stone formation and recurrence. Therefore, the present systematic review suggests conducting additional long-term studies in this direction.

References

1.
Vella M, Karydi M, Coraci G, Oriti R, Melloni D. Pathophysiology and clinical aspects of urinary lithiasis. Urol Int. 2007;79(1):26-31. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Qureshi K, Oakley N, Hastie K. Management of urinary tract calculi. Surgery (Oxford). 2002;20(12):285-90. [crossref]
3.
Menon M, Resnick MI. Urinary lithiasis: Etiology, diagnosis and medical management. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, Wein AJ, editors. Campell’s urology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elvesier; 2004. Pp. 3229.
4.
Chen H, Hu K, Liang Y, Gao Y, Zeng C, Xu K, et al. Ample dietary fat reduced the risk of primary vesical calculi by inducing macrophages to engulf budding crystals in mice. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2022;12(2):747-58.[crossref][PubMed]
5.
Issler N, Dufek S, Kleta R, Bockenhauer D, Smeulders N, van’t Hoff W. Epidemiology of paediatric renal stone disease: A 22-year single centre experience in the UK. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18(1):136. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
McCarrison R. The causation of stone in India. Br Med J. 1931;1(3675):1009-15. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Rizvi SAH, Sultan S, Zafar MN, Ahmed B, Faiq SM, Hossain KZ, et al. Evaluation of children with urolithiasis. Indian J Urol. 2007;23:420-27. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Han H, Segal AM, Seifter JL, Dwyer JT. Nutritional management of kidney stones (Nephrolithiasis). Clin Nutr Res. 2015;4(3):137-52. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Anderson DA. The nutritional significance of primary bladder stones. Br J Urol. 1962;34:160-77. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Teotia M, Teotia SP. Kidney and bladder stones in India. Postgrad Med J. 1977;53 Suppl 2:41-51.
11.
Teotia M, Krishna S, Teotia SP. Kidney and vesical stones in children Chapter 106. In: Teotia SP, Teotia M, editors. Nutritional and metabolic bone and stone disease an Asian perspective. New Delhi: CBS Publishers and Distributors; 2008. Pp. 795-807.
12.
Saxena A, Sharma RK. Nutritional aspect of nephrolithiasis. Indian J Urol. 2010;26(4):523-30. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Parikh HS, Shah RC. Chemical composition of calculi. Indian J Med Sci. 1960;14(5):401-05.
14.
Raju RVS, Rao CN, Satyanarayana U. Chemical analysis of Urinary Calculi in coastal Andra Pradesh. Indian J Med Res. 1987;85:565-71.
15.
Pundir CS, Goyal L, Thakur M, Kuchhal NK, Bhargava AK, Yadav SP. Chemical analysis of urinary calculi in Harayana. Indian J Med Res. 1998;52(1):16-21.
16.
Singh SM, Rao DVN, Bapna BC. Recurrent renal calculi A- study of incidence by follow-up examination. Indian J Med Science. 1971;59(7):1077-82.
17.
Alelign T, Petros B. Kidney stone disease: An update on current concepts. Adv Urol. 2018;2018:3068365. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Singal RK, Denstedt JD. Contemporary management of ureteral stones. Urol Clin North Am. 1997;24(1):59-70. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM, et al. Gray.s Anatomy. 38 th ed, Edinburg: Churchil Livingstone; 2000; 1828-33.
20.
Jenkins AD. Calculus formation; In Adult and Pediatric Urology, Vol. 1, 4 th ed; Ed.Gillenwater JY, Grayhack JT, Howards SS, Mitchell ME; 355-447.
21.
Borghi L, Schianchi T, Meschi T, Guerra A, Allegri F, Maggiore U, et al. Comparison of two diets for the prevention of recurrent stones in idiopathic hypercalciuria. N Eng J Med. 2002;346(2):77-84. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Sarica K, Inal Y, Erturhan S, Yag? ci F. The effect of calcium channel blockers on stone regrowth and recurrence after shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res. 2006;34(3):184-89. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Dussol B, Iovanna C, Rotily M, Morange S, Leonetti F, Dupuy P, et al. A randomized trial of low-animalprotein or high-fiber diets for secondary prevention of calcium nephrolithiasis. Nephron Clinical Practice. 2008;110(3):c185-94. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Meschi T, Schianchi T, Ridolo E, Adorni G, Allegri F, Guerra A, et al. Body weight, diet and water intake in preventing stone disease. Urol Int. 2004;72:29-33. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Zein-el-Amir Z, Malik MH, Khan S, Khan FA, Ahmed A, Farooqi MA. Vesical Calculi in children: Study of their nutritional status. Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College (JRMC). 2012;16(2):115-17.
26.
Tondare SB, Patil-Rawandale AV, Chitale AM, Patni L, Tondare MB. Management of ureteric calculi in Dhule City of North-western Maharashtra. Journal of Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences University. 2013;2(1):69-76.
27.
Malladad N, Manjunath DA, Anil R, Radhakrishna V. Clinical study and management of vesical calculus. Int Surg J. 2018;5(4):1281-85. [crossref]
28.
Esposito C, Autorino G, Masieri L, Castagnetti M, Del Conte F, Coppola V, et al. Minimally invasive management of bladder stones in children. Front Pediatr. 2021;8:618756. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Singh KJ, Kaur J. Comparison of three different endoscopic techniques in management of bladder calculi. Indian J Urol. 2011;27(1):10-13. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Türk C, Petr? ík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU guidelines on diagnosis and conservative management of urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):468-74. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Stamatiou KN, Karanasiou VI, Lacroix RE, Kavouras NG, Papadimitriou VT, Chlopsios C, et al. Prevalence of urolithiasis in rural Thebes, Greece. Rural Remote Health. 2006;6(4):610. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Jagannath K, Gupta AK, Srinivasan N. A study on ureteric calculi in a rural tertiary care centre. Int Surg J. 2019;6:1312-17. [crossref]
33.
Saxena A, Sharma RK. Nutritional aspect of nephrolithiasis. Indian J Urol. 2010;26(4):523-30. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Rotily M, Léonetti F, Iovanna C, Berthezene P, Dupuy P, Vazi A, et al. Effects of low animal protein or high-fiber diets on urine composition in calcium nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int. 2000;57(3):1115-23. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Lin BB, Lin ME, Huang RH, Hong YK, Lin BL, He XJ. Dietary and lifestyle factors for primary prevention of nephrolithiasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrology. 2020;21:267. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Grases F, Simonet BM, Prieto RM, March JG. Variation of InsP4,InsP5 and InsP6 levels in tissues and biological fluids depending on dietary phytate. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2001;12:595-601. Doi: 10.1016/S0955-2863(01)00178-4. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Noori N, Honarkar E, Goldfarb DS, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Taheri M, Shakhssalim N, et al. Urinary lithogenic risk profile in recurrent stone formers with hyperoxaluria: A randomized controlled trial comparing DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension)-style and low-oxalate diets. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63(3):456-63. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Poletti PA, Platon A, Rutschmann OT, Schmidlin FR, Iselin CE, Becker CD. Low- dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(4):927-33. [crossref][PubMed]
39.
Niemann T, Kollmann T, Bongartz G. Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: A meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(2):396-401.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60977.18632

Date of Submission: Oct 20, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Feb 10, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Mar 16, 2023
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 28, 2022
• Manual Googling: Feb 17, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Mar 14, 2023 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 5

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com