Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 49875

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : October | Volume : 17 | Issue : 10 | Page : EC25 - EC31 Full Version

Clinical and Prognostic Significance of PD-L1, Beclin 1 and Fascin 1 Immunohistochemical Expression in Colorectal Carcinoma


Published: October 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64372.18643
Sabah Mohamed Hanafy, Heba Mohammed Rashad, Adel Bakry, Asmaa A Mahmoud, Mahmoud Abdou Yassin, Mostafa M Elaidy, Mai M Abdelwahab

1. Lecturer, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt; Laboratory Medicine Department Applied Medical Science, Al Baha University, KSA. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Banha University, Benha, Egypt. 3. Lecturer, Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt. 4. Lecturer, Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt. 5. Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt. 6. Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt. 7. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Heba Mohammed Rashad,
Faridnada Street, Benha, Egypt.
E-mail: heba_massoud@yahoo.com

Abstract

Introduction: Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of death worldwide, and its incidence has been rising. It is important to identify novel markers that could predict the prognosis of the disease.

Aim: To identify the impact of Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), Beclin 1, and Fascin 1 immunohistochemical expression on CRC behaviour and disease prognosis. Also, to assess the different surgical options (laparoscopic versus open) in the management of these patients.

Materials and Methods: This cohort study included 72 cases of CRC, conducted in the Pathology, General Surgery, Internal Medicine, Clinical Oncology, and Medical Oncology Departments of the Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University Hospitals, Egypt between June 2018 and June 2022. PD-L1, Beclin 1, and Fascin 1 expression were assessed immunohistochemically, and their prognostic significance were evaluated. Data were analysed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 23.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and NCSS 11 for Windows (NCSS LCC., Kaysville, UT, USA) in the Community Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Results: A significant association was found between PD-L1 expression and grading (p-value=0.02), lymphovascular invasion, distant metastasis (p-value=0.001), peritoneal spread (p-value=0.002), tumour budding (p-value=0.005), lymph node metastasis, and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (p-value <0.001). A significant association was also found between Beclin 1 expression and distant metastasis (p-value=0.001), lymphovascular invasion (p-value=0.004), lymphocytic infiltration (p-value=0.006), perineural invasion (p-value=0.01), peritoneal spread (p-value=0.002), and AJCC stage (p-value=0.007). A highly significant association between Fascin 1 expression and grading, lymphovascular invasion, tumour budding, lymph node metastasis, lymphocytic infiltration, perineural invasion, metastasis, peritoneal spread, and AJCC stage (p-value <0.001) was detected. In patients with negative PD-L1 or high Fascin 1 expression, survival rates were lower. Beclin 1 expression was not associated with a favourable prognosis (p-value >0.05).

Conclusion: PD-L1, Beclin 1, and Fascin 1 expression are significantly elevated in CRC tissues and closely associated with adverse prognostic factors. PD-L1 and Fascin 1 expression have important prognostic value and may be of great help in identifying high-risk patients who will benefit the most from treatment.

Keywords

Colorectal cancer, Laparoscopic, Programmed cell death-ligand 1

CRC is the third most common cancer in males and females in the United States (1). The American Cancer Society estimated that for 2021, there were 104,270 new cases of colon cancer and 45,230 new cases of rectal cancer (2). It is the second most common cause of worldwide mortality, with 930,000 deaths and 1.9 million new cases registered in 2020. In Egypt, the number of CRC patients was about 3,430 in 2020 (3), representing approximately 33.8% of total gastrointestinal tumours and 6.2% of all malignancies. Recently, immune checkpoint blockers, cancer vaccines, and adoptive T cell therapy have achieved significant success in cancer treatment (4). Immune checkpoints, such as PD-1 and its ligand PD-L1, allow malignant cells to evade antitumour immunity. PD-L1 is a transmembrane molecule belonging to the B7 family (5). It acts through the PD-1/PD-L1 transduction pathway, blocking the proliferation and differentiation of T cells and inhibiting the secretion of many cytokines, thereby promoting the invasion and metastasis of cancer cells (6). PD-L1 is upregulated in many cancers, including lung, breast, and pancreatic cancers (7),(8).

Autophagy is a catabolic and homeostatic mechanism in which cytoplasmic organelles are sequestered in autophagosomes and subsequently degraded through lysosomes to maintain normal metabolism (9). It plays an important role in cellular resistance to stress (10). Studies have shown that inhibiting autophagy in cancer cells can increase chemotherapy-induced tumour cell death, making autophagy a potential therapeutic target (11). Autophagy is controlled by specific genes, including Beclin 1 (12). Overexpression of Beclin 1 stimulates autophagy and inhibits tumour development (13). Fascin actin-bundling protein 1 (Fascin 1) is a filamentous actin-binding protein that belongs to the fascin family. It has recently been identified as a therapeutic target for metastatic or aggressive types of many carcinomas. It promotes tumour cell migration, invasion, and metastasis (14).

The objectives of this study are to assess PD-L1, Beclin 1, and Fascin 1 expression in CRC and associate their immunohistochemical expressions with clinicopathological parameters to identify their impact on tumour behaviour and disease prognosis. Additionally, the study aims to assess different surgical options (laparoscopic versus open) in the management of CRC based on the site, stage of the tumour, and the general condition of the patients according to the American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) staging.

Material and Methods

This is a cohort study conducted in the Pathology, General Surgery, Internal Medicine, Clinical Oncology, and Medical Oncology Departments of the Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University Hospitals, Egypt, between June 2018 and June 2022. The study included 72 cases of CRC, excluding cases previously treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The research was approved by the ethical committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University (Zu-IRB: 9905/28). CRC cases were graded according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) 2019 classification (15), and TNM staging was applied according to AJCC (16). Tumour budding was assessed according to Guzin´ska-Ustymowiczk (17), while inflammatory infiltrate, blood and lymphatic embolism were assessed according to Jass JR et al., (18). Lymphocytic infiltration was evaluated as present or absent (19). Tumour borders were classified as either pushing or infiltrating. Perineural invasion was defined by the presence of tumour cells within the perineural space or tumour cells infiltrating the endoneurium, according to Batsakis JG (20). Most patients had follow-up records for four years. Patients were followed-up until their most recent medical examination or death, with the follow-up period ending at the completion of the study.

Immunohistochemistry: Sections cut at 4-5 μm were deparaffinised in xylene and rehydrated in graded alcohol. Then, they were incubated for 10 minutes in 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in absolute methanol to block endogenous peroxidase activity. Antigen retrieval was performed using pH 6.0 Dako target recovery solution (Dako, CA, USA). The sections were then incubated for 60 minutes at room temperature with antibodies against PD-L1 (monoclonal, rabbit, Novus Bio, USA, dilution 1:200), Beclin 1 (rabbit monoclonal, EPR1733Y, ab51031, Abcam, Cambridge, UK, dilution 1:50), and mouse anti-Fascin 1 antibody (clone #833223, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA, dilution 1:50). The stained slides were independently examined by two pathologists, and there was no interobserver variability.

Assessment of Immunohistochemical Staining

PD-L1 immunohistochemistry: PD-L1 was visualised as cytoplasmic and membranous brown granules. The percentage of positive cells was scored as follows: <5%: 0, 5% to 25%: 1, 26% to 50%: 2, 51% to 75%: 3, and >75%: 4. The staining intensity was scored as 0 (negative), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate), or 3 (strong). A total score was calculated by multiplying the percentage and intensity scores. Further classification was done as follows: Negative group (0 to 1), weak positive (+) (2-4), medium positive (++) (5-8), strong positive (+++) (9-12). The expression was considered positive when scored as ‘+-+++’ (21).

Beclin 1 immunohistochemistry: Beclin 1 expression was mainly cytoplasmic, with occasional nuclear staining. The intensity was scored as follows: 0 (pale yellow or no staining), 1 (yellow), 2 (deep yellow), and 3 (brown). The percentage of positive cells was scored as follows: 0 (0%-10%), 1 (10%-25%), 2 (25%-50%), and 3 (50%-100%). A mean score was calculated as [(intensity reader 1×percentage reader 1)+(intensity reader 2×percentage reader 2)]/2. Finally, Beclin 1 expression was scored as low expression (=0) and high expression (>0) (22).

Fascin 1 immunohistochemistry: Fascin 1 expression was scored semi-quantitatively. It was localised in the cytoplasm of tumour cells and cell membrane. A low expression of Fascin 1 staining was defined as less than 10% of the tumour. Patients with expression between 10% and 35% were considered to have moderate expression, while patients exhibiting ≥35% were considered to have high expression (23).

Statistical Analysis

Data was analysed by using IBM SPSS 23.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and NCSS 11 for Windows (NCSS LLC., Kaysville, UT, USA). The quantitative data were reported as mean±Standard Deviation (SD), while for qualitative data, we used frequency and percentage. The following tests were performed:

• Independent sample t-test: Used for normally distributed data.
• Mann-Whitney test: Used for not normally distributed data.
• Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test: Used for the analysis of qualitative data.
• Kaplan-Meier test: Used for survival analysis.

A p-value <0.05 was considered significant, a p-value <0.001 was considered highly significant, while a p-value >0.05 was considered insignificant.

Results

Clinicopathological parameters are presented in (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 2). The mean age was 58.9±10.5 years, with 54 cases being males (75%) and 18 cases being females (25%).

Immunohistochemical Results

PDL -1 expression: Thirty-eight cases (52.8%) were negative for PD-L1, while 34 cases (47.2%) showed positive PD-L1 expression. A significant association was found between PD-L1 expression and grading (p-value=0.02), lymphovascular invasion, distant metastasis (p-value=0.001), peritoneal spread (p-value=0.002), and tumour budding (p-value=0.005). A highly statistically significant association was found between PD-L1 expression and lymphocytic infiltration, lymph node metastasis, and AJCC stage (p-value <0.001). No statistically significant relationship was found between PD-L1 expression and both T stage (p-value=0.29) and perineural invasion (p-value=0.11) (Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4).

Beclin 1 expression: Forty cases (55.6%) showed high Beclin 1 expression, while 32 cases (44.4%) showed low expression. There was a significant association between Beclin 1 expression and distant metastasis (p-value=0.001), lymphovascular invasion (p-value=0.004), lymphocytic infiltration (p-value=0.006), perineural invasion (p-value=0.01), peritoneal spread (p-value=0.002), and AJCC stage (p=0.007). No association was found between Beclin 1 expression and grade (p-value=0.75), tumour stage (p-value=0.09), tumour stage (p-value=0.22), or lymph node metastasis (p-value=0.05) (Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 6).

Fascin 1 expression: Thirty-six cases (50%) showed low expression, 21/72 (29.1%) showed moderate expression, and 15/72 (20.9%) showed high expression. There was a highly significant relation between Fascin 1 expression and lymphovascular invasion, grading, lymphocytic infiltration, nodal metastasis, peritoneal spread, and tumour budding (p-value <0.001). A highly significant association was found between Fascin 1 expression, perineural invasion, metastatic disease, and AJCC stage (p-value <0.001). Fascin 1 expression was significantly higher in patients with clinical Stage III and IV compared with Stage I and II (p-value=0.03) (Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8).

Relation between PD-L1, Beclin 1 and Fascin 1 expression: There were significant associations between PD-L1 and Fascin 1 expression (p-value=0.001) and between Beclin 1 and Fascin 1 expression (p-value=0.006), while no significant association was found between Beclin 1 expression and PD-L1 (p-value=0.96) (Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 7).

Association of PD-L1, Beclin 1 and Fascin 1 expression and survival: Three-year Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and four-year Overall Survival (OS) were used as the primary outcomes.

Correlation between the expression of PD-L1 and the prognosis of CRC patients: The 4-year cumulative survival rate of patients positive for PD-L1 (n=34) was 94.1%, whereas that of patients negative for PD-L1 (n=38) was 78.9% with a near statistically significant association (p-value=0.06) (Table/Fig 9).

The progression-free survival for patients positive for PD-L1 was 61.8% during follow-up, with an estimated mean event-free survival of 12.7 months. For patients negative for PD-L1, the progression-free survival was 57.9% with a mean time of 12.1 months. However, there was no significant difference in PFS between the two groups (p-value=0.64).

The relationship between survival and Beclin 1 marker: The four-year follow-up, 34 out of 40 patients with high Beclin 1 expression were still alive, resulting in an 85% survival rate. For patients with low Beclin 1 expression, the overall survival was 87.5% (28 out of 32 patients were alive). However, there was no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups (p-value=0.7). Univariate analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method showed no correlation between Beclin 1 expression and progression-free survival (p-value=0.8) (Table/Fig 10).

Prognostic significance of Fascin 1 in relation to progression free and OS: The four-year overall survival was 85.7% for patients with moderate expression of Fascin 1 and 66.7% for patients with high expression, compared to 94.4% for patients with low expression (p-value=0.02) (Table/Fig 11). In terms of progression-free survival, patients with high and intermediate expression had worse PFS (53.3% and 52.4%) compared to patients with low expression (66.7%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p-value=0.45).

Surgical results: 18 (25%) patients underwent laparoscopic resection, with half of them having a covering stoma and the other half undergoing primary anastomosis. Open resection was performed in 40 cases (55%), with 50% of them having a stoma, and the remaining cases were managed by resection and primary reconstruction. Fourteen patients (20%) were considered inoperable and underwent palliative surgery with a converting stoma. When comparing open and laparoscopic surgery, laparoscopic surgery was found to be safer, with less intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications, especially when combined with protecting proximal stoma (Table/Fig 12),(Table/Fig 13).

Discussion

Worldwide, colon cancer-related mortality is mainly attributed to distant spread (24). PD-L1 can induce inhibitory signals when it binds to its receptor, leading to T cell activation, cytokine secretion, and promoting immune tolerance and immune escape of tumour cells. The effect of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors has been widely recognised (25). In present study, PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with tumour grade (p-value=0.02), lymphovascular invasion, distant metastasis (p-value=0.001), peritoneal spread (p-value=0.002), lymphocytic infiltration, and lymph node metastasis (p-value <0.001). These findings are consistent with previous studies by Shan T et al., except for lymph node metastasis (26). Furthermore, in terms of Overall Survival (OS), PD-L1 expression showed a near significant association with favourable clinical outcomes (p-value=0.06). This finding was in line with Sabatier R et al., who reported that positive PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with better OS in breast cancer cases, as well as better metastasis-free survival and response to chemotherapy. However, our results contradict those of Li Y et al., who found that PD-L1 was associated with an unfavourable outcome [27,28]. This discrepancy may be attributed to the larger number of cases in present study. Present study results demonstrate that PD-L1 is significantly associated with poor tumour outcomes, supporting the findings of Shan T et al., (26). This was consistent with poorer outcomes observed in non small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma (Wang A et al.,), and osteosarcoma (Lussier DM et al.,) [29,30]. These findings can be attributed to the complex functions of PD-L1 in the initiation and growth of colon cancer.

Beclin 1 plays a role in regulating both apoptosis and autophagy, and the balance between these processes determines the efficacy of anticancer treatments (31). Present study found a statistically significant relationship between Beclin 1 expression and distant metastasis (p-value=0.001), which was consistent with the findings of Zhang B et al., who also reported a close association between Beclin 1 and distant metastasis in CRC (32). However, Zhang B et al., did not find a relationship between Beclin 1 expression and venous invasion or lymph node metastasis, which contradicts present study results as authors found a statistically significant relationship between Beclin 1 expression and lymphovascular invasion (p-value=0.004) as well as the degree of lymphocytic infiltration (p-value=0.006). In present study, there was no significant association between Beclin 1 expression and tumour grade (p-value=0.75) or stage (p-value=0.09), which was consistent with the findings of Zhang B et al., who also did not find an association between Beclin 1 and tumour grade or stage. However, in present study, Beclin 1 expression was not associated with favourable prognostic outcomes in CRC patients (p-value >0.05). This contradicts the findings of Park JM et al., who found that high expression of Beclin 1 in primary tumours was associated with reduced survival in patients receiving 5-FU as adjuvant therapy (33).

Fascin 1 expression in tumour cells is associated with characteristics of progenitor cells in colon cancer, and it is considered a stem cell marker for metastatic cancers (34). In present study, Fascin 1 expression showed a highly statistically significant relationship with lymph node metastasis, tumour grade, and the presence of metastatic disease (p-value <0.001), which was in line with the findings of Tampakis A et al., who also found an association between Fascin 1 expression and lymph node metastasis (p-value <0.001), distant metastasis (p-value=0.002), and high-grade tumours (p-value=0.002) (23).

Machesky LM and Li A proposed that the upregulation of Fascin 1 in the EMT pathway facilitates the motility and invasion of tumour cells (35). Previous studies have found a significant association between overexpression of Fascin 1 and low E-cadherin, indicating the progression of cells through the Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition (EMT). As cells acquire Fascin 1, they lose E-cadherin (36). However, Oh SY et al., did not find a significant relationship between Fascin 1 expression and lymph node metastasis, which contradicts present study findings. Present study results were similar as present study did not find a significant association between Fascin 1 expression and clinicopathological factors such as tumour size (37).

In present study, patients with low levels of Fascin 1 had better survival, and there was a significant difference (p-value=0.02). This was consistent with the findings of Tampakis A et al., who reported that patients with high expression of Fascin 1 had significantly higher rates of disease recurrence or death (23).

When comparing laparoscopic and open surgeries in patients with CRC, present study observed that postoperative complications were significantly reduced in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery. The most serious complication, postoperative leak, was observed in nine patients, with only one of them undergoing laparoscopic resection. Present study findings are in line with the studies conducted by Ma K et al., and Benson AB et al., who found that laparoscopic procedures are highly effective in reducing ileus, infection, hospital stay, and postoperative leak compared to open surgery [38,39].

Limitation(s)

Unfortunately, due to a lack of financial support, additional prognostic markers or microRNA assessment of these or other markers were not included.

Conclusion

Positive PD-L1 expression and low Fascin 1 expression in CRC are favourable for patients’ survival. PD-L1, Beclin 1, and Fascin 1 expression can be considered reliable biomarkers in the development of CRC and distant metastasis. These three markers are significantly associated with each other. Present study data could serve as a foundation for further investigating the value of these markers in targeted therapy for CRC. Postoperative surgical outcomes are better among patients who undergo laparoscopic surgery, with or without a covering stoma.

References

1.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):07-33. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Ferlizza E, Solmi L, Sgarzi M, Ricciardiello, Lauriola M. The roadmap of colorectal cancer screening. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(5):1101. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Bader El Din NG, Ibrahim MK, El-Shenawy R, Salum GM, Farouk S, Zayed N, et al. MicroRNAs expression profiling in Egyptian colorectal cancer patients. IUBMB Life. 2020;72(2):275-84. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Simon K. Colorectal cancer development and advances in screening. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:967-76. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
D’Errico G, Machado HL, Sainz B Jr. A current perspective on cancer immune therapy: Step-by-step approach to constructing the magic bullet. Clin Transl Med. 2017;6:3. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Berger KN, Pu JJ. PD-1 pathway and its clinical application: A 20 year journey after discovery of the complete human PD-1 gene. Gene. 2018;638:20-25. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Okita R, Maeda A, Shimizu K, Nojima Y, Saisho S, Nakata M. PD-L1 overexpression is partially regulated by EGFR/HER2 signaling and associated with poor prognosis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2017;66(7):865-76. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
AiErken N, Shi HJ, Zhou Y, Shao N, Zhang J, Shi Y, et al. High PD-L1 expression is closely associated with tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and leads to good clinical outcomes in Chinese triple negative breast cancer patients. Int Biol Sci. 2017;13(9):1172-79. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Klionsky DJ, Emr SD. Autophagy as a regulated pathway of cellular degradation. Science. 290(5497):1717-21. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Huang S, Yang ZJ, Yu C, Sinicrope FA. Inhibition of mTOR kinase by AZD8055 can antagonize chemotherapy-induced cell death through autophagy induction and down-regulation of p62/sequestosome. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(46):40002-12. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Bellodi C, Lidonnici MR, Hamilton A, Helgason GV, Soliera AR, Ronchetti M, et al. Targeting autophagy potentiates tyrosine kinase inhibitor-induced cell death in Philadelphia chromosome-positive cells, including primary CML stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(5):1109-23. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Pattingre S, Espert L, Biard-Piechaczyk M, Codogno P. Regulation of macroautophagy by mTOR and Beclin 1 complexes. Biochimie. 2008;90(2):313-23. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Batlle E, Sancho E, Franci C, Dominguez D, Monfar M, Baulida J, et al. The transcription factor snail is a repressor of E-cadherin gene expression in epithelial tumour cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2(2):84-89. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Ma Y, Machesky LM. Fascin1 in carcinomas: Its regulation and prognostic value. Int J Cancer. 2015;137(11):2534-44. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Nagtegaal ID, Odze RD, Klimstra D, Paradis V, Rugge M, Schirmacher P, et al; WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Histopathology. 2020;76(2):182-88. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK, et al. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(2):93-99. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Guzin´ ska-Ustymowicz K. Tumour budding in colorectal cancer: Recent progress in colorectal cancer research. Tetsuichiro Muto E, Mochizuki H, Masaki T. New York: Nova Biomedical Books. Chapter: Aggressive and non-aggressive tumour budding in colorectal cancers.; 2006: Pp.105-16.
18.
Jass JR, Love SB, Northover JM. A new prognostic classification of rectal cancer. Lancet. 1987;1(8545):1303-06. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Sacchi G, Weber E, Aglianó M, Lorenzoni P, Rossi A, Caruso AM, et al. Lymphatic vessels in colorectal cancer and their relation with inflammatory infiltrate. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(1):40-47. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Batsakis JG. Nerves and neurotropic carcinomas. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1985;94(4 Pt 1):426-27. [crossref]
21.
Tessier-Cloutier B, Kalloger SE, AI-Kandari M, Milne K, Gao D, Nelson BH, et al. Programmed cell death ligand 1 cut-point is associated with reduced disease specific survival in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):618. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Guo GF, Wang YX, Zhang YJ, Chen XX, Lu JB, Wang HH, et al. Predictive and prognostic implications of 4E-BP1, Beclin-1, and LC3 for cetuximab treatment combined with chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer with wild-type KRAS: Analysis from real-world data. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(15):1840-53. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Tampakis A,Tampaki EC, Nonni A, Kostakis ID, Posabella A, Kontzoglou K, et al. High fascin-1 expression in colorectal cancer identifies patients at high-risk for early disease recurrence and associated mortality. BMC Cancer. 2021;21:153. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-07842-4. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Vinson K, George D, Fender A, Bertrand F, Sigounas G. The notch pathway in colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2016;138(8):1835-42. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Liu B, Song Y, Liu D. Recent development in clinical applications of PD-1 and PD-L1 antibodies for cancer immunotherapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10:174. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Shan T, Chen S, Wu T, Yang Y, Li S, Chen X. PD-L1 expression in colon cancer and its relationship with clinical prognosis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2019;12(5):1764-1769.
27.
Sabatier R, Finetti P, Mamessier E, Adelaide J, Chaffanet M, Ali HR, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of PDL1 expression in breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6(7):5449-64. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Li Y, He M, Zhou Y, Yang C, Wei S, Bian X, et al. The prognostic and clinicopathological roles of PD-L1 expression in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:139. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Wang A, Wang HY, Liu Y, Zhao MC, Zhang HJ, Lu ZY, et al. The prognostic value of PD-L1 expression for non-small cell lung cancer patients: A meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(4):450-56. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Lussier DM, Johnson JL, Hingorani P, Blattman JN. Combination immunotherapy with α-CTLA-4 and α-PD-L1 antibody blockade prevents immune escape and leads to complete control of metastatic osteosarcoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2015;3:21. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Kang R, Zeh HJ, Lotze MT, Tang D. The Beclin 1 network regulates autophagy and apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18:571-80. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Zhang B, Wang J, Wang X, Zhu J, Liu Q, Shi Z, et al. Proteogenomic characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature. 2014;513(7518):382-87. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Park JM, Huang S, Wu TT, Foster NR, Sinicrope FA. Prognostic impact of Beclin 1, p62/sequestosome 1 and LC3 protein expression in colon carcinomas from patients receiving 5-fluorouracil as adjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer Biol Ther. 2013;14(2):100-07. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Huang FK, Han S, Xing B, Huang J, Liu B, Bordeleau F, et al. Targeted inhibition of fascin function blocks tumour invasion and metastatic colonization. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7465. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Machesky LM, Li A. Fascin: Invasive filopodia promoting metastasis. CommunIntegr Biol. 2010;3(3):263-70.[crossref][PubMed]
36.
Brieger J, Duesterhoeft A, Brochhausen C, Gosepath J, Kirkpatrick CJ, Mann WJ. Recurrence of pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland-predictive value of cadherin-11 and fascin. APMIS. 2008;116(12):1050-57. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Oh SY, Kim YB, Suh KW, Paek OJ, Moon HY. Prognostic impact of fascin-1 expression is more significant in advanced colorectal cancer. J Surg Res. 2012;172(1):102-08. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Ma K, Wang XY, Chen JH. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for simultaneous resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastases. ZhonghuaWai Ke Za Zhi. 2018;56(7):516-21.
39.
Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, Cederquist L, Chen YJ, Ciombor KK, et al. NCCN guidelines (R) insights colon cancer, version 2.2018 featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2018;16(4):359-69.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64372.18643

Date of Submission: Mar 31, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jun 07, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jul 26, 2023
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 06, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jul 21, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jul 24, 2023 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com