Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 125075

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : October | Volume : 17 | Issue : 10 | Page : DC14 - DC19 Full Version

Clinicoepidemiological Profile and Diagnosis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 and Influenza Viruses in Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Illness by Real-time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: October 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64041.18578
Maasha, Shailpreet Kaur Sidhu, Kanwardeep Singh, Satpal Aloona, Loveena Oberoi

1. Junior Resident, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab, India. 2. Associate Professor and Co-PI VRDL, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab, India. 3. Professor and PI VRDL, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab, India. 4. Professor, Department of Medicine, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab, India. 5. Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Shailpreet Kaur Sidhu,
Associate Professor and Co-PI VRDL, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
E-mail: shail78@hotmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Severe Acute Respiratory Illness (SARI) caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and influenza viruses represent a significant global public health concern. The disease spectrum ranges from mild to life-threatening conditions. Surveillance of hospitalised SARI patients is an essential public health tool used to identify cause of the disease, track changes in circulating viruses and serve as an alert mechanism for potential pandemic viruses.

Aim: To determine the rate of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus positivity among SARI cases and to investigate the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the patients.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 400 SARI patients admitted to Guru Nanak Dev Hospital, Amritsar, Punjab, India between February 2021 and June 2022. The clinical, demographic, and epidemiological data, as well as co-morbidities of all patients were recorded. Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal samples were collected and tested for SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A, Influenza A (H3N2), Influenza A (H1N1) pdm09-pandemic 2009, and Influenza B using real-time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 for Windows.

Results: Out of the 400 SARI patients, 117 (29.25%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 14 (3.5%) for Influenza A, 7 (1.75%) for Influenza A (H1N1) pdm09, and 4 (1%) for Influenza A (H3N2). The majority of cases in both SARS-CoV-2 and influenza were in the 41-60 years age group (47.86% and 57.14%, respectively). Males were predominantly infected in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients (62/117, 52.99%), while females were more infected in influenza positive cases (9/14, 64.28%). The most common presenting symptoms were fever, cough, dyspnoea, and sore throat in both cases. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and coronary artery disease were the most common co-morbidities observed.

Conclusion: Evaluation of clinical and epidemiological profiles of SARI patients can aid in better understanding and management of outbreaks. Close monitoring and quarantine measures will be necessary to prevent extensive transmission within the community.

Keywords

Co-morbidies, Influenza virus, Respiratory viruses, Severe acute respiratory infection

Acute Respiratory Infections (ARIs) have been increasingly recognised as major contributors to hospitalisations and mortality in all age groups worldwide. SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, avian influenza viruses (H5N1, H7N7, and H7N3), and swine flu viruses (H1N1, H3N2) are emerging pathogens that cause pandemic or fatal respiratory infections (1). SARI case is defined as a case of an ARI with a history of fever of ≥38°C, cough, onset within the last 10 days, and requiring hospitalisation (2). SARI caused by viruses like SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza is the leading cause of hospitalisations and deaths worldwide.

In December 2019, a cluster of patients was admitted to hospitals with a diagnosis of pneumonia, and they were found to have epidemiological links with a wet animal and seafood market in Wuhan, China. On January 7, 2020, the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC) identified a novel coronavirus from lower respiratory tract samples of these patients, which was later named SARS-CoV-2 by the International Committee on Taxonomy of viruses (3). On March 11, 2020, SARS-CoV-2 was declared a pandemic by World Health Organisation (WHO) (4). The most common symptoms include cough, rhinitis, myalgia, fever, dyspnoea, and less widely documented symptoms such as headache, vomiting, and haemoptysis. Severe cases have been reported to suffer from progressive respiratory failure due to alveolar damage, which can lead to death. Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 include being aged 60 years or older, and co-morbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, and malignancy (5). RT-PCR assay for the detection of viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) is the test of choice for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Viral RNA has been found in both upper and lower respiratory tract secretions, serum, stool, and urine specimens. The most common detection targets are E, N, S, and ORF1ab/RdRp genes (6). The WHO has reported 75,43,67,807 confirmed cases of COVID-19 so far, with 68,25,461 deaths globally as of February 6, 2023. In India, a total of 4,46,83,454 confirmed cases have been found to be positive as of February 6, 2023, with 5,30,745 deaths occurring (7).

Influenza virus is another common human pathogen that has caused serious respiratory illness and death over the past century, and SARI resulting from influenza virus infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide [8,9]. Influenza virus is an enveloped virus of the Orthomyxoviridae family and is classified into four genera: Influenza virus A to D (IAV, IBV, ICV, and IDV). Currently, Influenza A (H1N1), Influenza A (H3N2), and Influenza B cause most epidemic diseases in humans (10). Influenza virus is transmitted at a short range (1-2 meters) from person to person through large (≥5 μm) droplets and small particles (<5 μm) droplet nuclei (aerosols) that are expelled by coughing. Following an incubation period of 1 to 2 days, influenza virus infection begins with a sudden onset of symptoms, which include fever, headache, myalgia, dry cough, sore throat, and nasal discharge (11). Pneumonia, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), and death can occur in high-risk patients. Several risk factors or complications have been identified, including individuals aged >65 years or <6 months, pregnancy, metabolic disorders like obesity, diabetes, kidney disease, cardiovascular conditions like hypertension, congenital heart disease, coronary artery disease, and COPD (12). Nasopharyngeal specimens have the highest yield for influenza viruses. In patients hospitalised with respiratory failure, lower respiratory tract specimens should be tested if upper respiratory specimens are negative (13). Nucleic acid testing of influenza by RT-PCR has widely replaced traditional virus culture due to shorter turnaround time and increased sensitivity (14).

Both diseases share common symptoms and clinical features. However, the clinical manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 are more concealed, with fewer underlying diseases and milder respiratory symptoms compared to influenza (5). Mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2 is higher (63%) than in patients with influenza (55%) (15). The higher morbidity and mortality with SARS-CoV-2 compared to influenza can be attributed to the lack of basic immunity in the population and the absence of vaccination and medication (16).

This study was needed to emphasise the fact that more seasons of surveillance are required for the respiratory pathogens causing severe respiratory diseases. The aim of the study was to diagnose SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A virus, Influenza A (H1N1) pdm09, Influenza A (H3N2), and Influenza B virus among SARI patients. The primary objective of the study was to assess the clinical profile, laboratory parameters, and diagnosis of patients with SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus, and the secondary objective was to study the associated co-morbidities.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab, India. The study group included patients admitted due to SARI at Guru Nanak Dev Hospital, Amritsar, Punjab, India. Four hundred respiratory samples were collected during the period of February 2021 to June 2022 after approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) (IEC Number 3350/D-26/2020).

Inclusion criteria: All subjects who were admitted due to SARI and gave consent were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: All subjects who denied consent to participate in the study were excluded from the study.

All available samples during the study duration were considered. Demographic details such as the patient’s name, age, gender, address, medical history including co-morbidities, symptoms, vital signs, baseline laboratory parameters such as Total Leukocyte Count (TLC), D-dimer, C-Reactive Protein (CRP), prothrombin time, platelet count, alkaline phosphatase, and clinical details were collected. Patients admitted as SARI were defined as hospitalised patients with an acute onset of fever of 38ÂşC or higher in the previous 10 days and atleast one sign or symptom of acute respiratory illness, including cough, shortness of breath, tachypnoea, abnormal breath sounds on auscultation, sputum production, haemoptysis, chest pain, or chest radiograph consistent with pneumonia (17).

Study Procedure

Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal samples collected from patients were transported in viral transport medium under a proper cold chain conditions to the Viral Research and Diagnostic Laboratory. The samples were handled and processed in a biosafety level 2 facility following the WHO protocol (18). RNA was extracted from the clinical samples using an automated viral extraction technique (KingFisher Flex Thermo Fisher Scientific). The extracted nucleic acid was further processed for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A, Influenza A (H1N1) pdm09, Influenza A (H3N2), and Influenza B. Amplification was carried out in a QUANTSTUDIO PCR machine. The PCR amplification kit used for SARS-CoV-2 was CoviPath COVID-19 RT-PCR kit (Applied Biosystems). The PCR amplification kit used for influenza virus was TRUPCR H1N1/H3N2 with Inf-B kit. The results were analysed by reading the Cycle threshold (Ct) values and graphs of amplification. Data were entered into Microsoft Excel sheets.

Statistical Analysis

Discrete variables were presented as frequency counts and percentages, while continuous variables were expressed as mean±Standard Deviation (SD). The Chi-square test was used to compare variables between the two groups. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed using the “SPSS 23.0” statistical package for Windows.

Results

A total of 400 patient samples were collected, prevalence of SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A, Influenza A (H1N1) pdm 09, and Influenza A (H3N2) is shown in (Table/Fig 1). No cases of influenza B or co-infection of SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza were reported.

Among the 117 SARS-CoV-2 positive cases, males accounted for a higher number, with 62 (52.99%) compared to females with 55 (47.00%). The most commonly affected age group was 41-60 years, comprising 56 (47.86%) cases. Among the 14 Influenza positive cases, females were more affected with 9 (64.28%) cases compared to males with 5 (35.71%). The most common age group affected by Influenza was 41-60 years, with 8 (57.14%) cases (Table/Fig 2).

The mean age of SARS-CoV-2 positive patients was 50.94±15.55 years. The most common clinical symptoms observed in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients were fever (117, 100%), cough (95, 81.19%), dyspnoea (85, 72.64%), sore throat (69, 58.97%), and body aches (53, 45.29%). Among the positive influenza cases, the most common symptom observed was fever (14, 100%), followed by cough (13, 92.85%), dyspnoea (11, 78.57%), body aches (11, 78.57%), and sore throat (7, 50%) (Table/Fig 3).

The most common associated co-morbidities seen in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients were hypertension (59, 50.42%), diabetes mellitus (45, 38.46%), COPD (27, 23.07%), and heart disease (11, 9.40%). In influenza positive patients, the most common associated co-morbidities were COPD (8, 57.14%), hypertension (6, 42.85%), diabetes mellitus (2, 14.28%), and heart disease (5, 35.71%). Out of 117 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients, 50 (42.73%) required ICU admission, while in influenza positive cases, 6 (42.85%) patients required ICU care (Table/Fig 3).

The most common laboratory parameters observed in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients were leucocytosis (115, 98.29%), raised D-dimer (104, 88.88%), raised CRP (51, 43.58%), raised Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) (50, 42.73%), raised Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) (53, 45.29%), raised blood urea (46, 39.31%), and raised prothrombin time (25, 21.36%). Furthermore, 104 (88.88%) patients showed a raised respiratory rate, 31 (26.49%) showed decreased oxygen saturation, 10 (8.54%) were on invasive ventilator support and 8 (6.83%) were on non-invasive ventilation.

The most common laboratory parameters observed in Influenza positive patients were raised CRP (10, 71.42%), leukopenia (8, 57.14%), raised SGPT (9, 64.28%), raised SGOT (8, 57.18%), anaemia (5, 35.71%), and thrombocytopenia (4, 28.57%). Out of 14 influenza positive patients, 6 (42.85%) showed a raised respiratory rate, 5 (35.71%) showed decreased oxygen saturation, none were on invasive ventilation, and 3 (21.42%) were on non invasive ventilator support (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

The SARI caused by viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza are the leading causes of hospitalisation and deaths worldwide. The clinical manifestations of these infections range from mild to moderate symptoms to severe symptoms that require hospitalisation. These infections are also associated with a wide range of co-morbidities and risk factors, which have resulted in poorer clinical outcomes.

This study was conducted on 400 patients admitted with SARI at a tertiary care hospital. Out of the 400 admitted SARI patients, 117 (29.25%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by real-time PCR. In a similar study conducted by Aggarwal A et al., 39% of SARI patients were found to be SARS-CoV-2 positive (17). Another study conducted by Sharma A et al., on SARI cases reported a 17.6% SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate in patients (19). Agarwal N et al., also found a 33.8% SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate among SARI patients (20). In the present study, out of the 400 SARI patients, only 3.5% were found to be Influenza A positive; 1.75% were Influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 positive, and 1% were Influenza A (H3N2) positive. However, a study conducted by Dra? ga? nescu AC et al., detected a 41.2% Influenza positivity rate, with 57.2% for H1N1 and 29.3% for H3N2 (21). Pariani E et al., showed in their study that Influenza A H1N1 was detected in 58.3% and Influenza A H3N2 was detected in 20% of SARI cases (22). No cases of co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus were observed in the present study. The decrease in the prevalence of influenza viruses during this period may be attributed to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Several existing literature reports have documented the increased prevalence rate of SARS-CoV-2 among male patients. In the present study, there was also a slight male preponderance, with a positivity rate of 52.99%, which was relatively higher than the positivity rate among females at 47.00%. A study by Khan M et al., also showed a mainly male (70.25%) population being infected by SARS-CoV-2 (23). These results were consistent with the study conducted by Aggarwal A et al., which reported that 59.3% of positive cases were males (17). The higher incidence in male patients can possibly be explained by their increased exposure outside the home and a higher concentration of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme-2 (ACE-2) in males compared to females. ACE-2, which is expressed in multiple organ systems, enables the binding of SARS-CoV-2 to cell membranes and its subsequent entry (17). Furthermore, genetic factors such as the X chromosome and sex hormones like oestrogens, predominantly found in females, provide significant protection against SARS-CoV-2 by playing important roles in innate and adaptive immunity (23). Among the positive influenza cases, females (64.28%) were found to be in higher numbers than males (35.71%). This finding was in accordance with a study conducted by Dra? ga? nescu AC et al., which showed that females (53.3%) outnumbered males (46.7%) (21). Prasad S et al., also detected a slight female preponderance of 55.36% in a similar study (24). However, Mehta K et al., observed that males (54%) were more affected than females (46%) (25). This predominance in females can be explained by the fact that females generate higher proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine responses, making them more susceptible to influenza viruses (26).

In the present study, patients in the age group of 41 to 60 years had the highest positivity rate (47.86%) for SARS-CoV-2. Similar studies have also reported the 41-60 age group as the most commonly infected (8),(23). The most common age group affected by influenza was also 41-60 years (57.14%), followed by 0-20 years (21.42%) in this study. Raut S et al., reported that the maximum number of positive cases were seen in the age group of 41-60 years (24%) in their study (27). A study conducted by Prasad S et al., also showed the 41-60 age group as the most commonly infected (24). This finding was alarming because people in this age group are the young, income-generating, mobile population of the country. Therefore, the fact that they are more affected suggests that lockdown measures, social distancing, personal hygiene, and other preventive measures to combat these viruses should have been more strictly followed (28).

The most common clinical symptom found in SARS-CoV-2 positive SARI patients in the present study was fever (100%), followed by cough (81.19%), dyspnoea (72.64%), sore throat (58.97%), and body aches (45.29%). Yang L et al., also reported fever (85.5%) as the most common symptom, followed by cough (58.0%) (29). However, in a study conducted by Aggarwal A et al., on SARI patients, dyspnoea (90.6%) was the most common symptom, followed by cough (84.4%) and fever (68%) (17). Although the nasopharynx is theoretically the first organ infected with SARS-CoV-2, a recent study showed that infected individuals rarely show upper respiratory symptoms at the onset of the infection. This suggests that the virus mostly targets the cells of the lower respiratory tract (30). In reference to a study by Huang C et al., increased amounts of proinflammatory cytokines in the serum were associated with pulmonary inflammation and extensive lung damage (31).

Among the positive influenza cases in this study, the most common symptoms observed were fever (100%), cough (92.85%), dyspnoea (78.57%), body aches (78.57%), and sore throat (50%). In a similar study, Zayet S et al., also reported fever (92.6%) as the most common symptom, followed by cough (81.5%), body aches (70.4%), dyspnoea (59.3%), and sore throat (44.4%) (32). Tong X et al., also detected fever (75.3%) and cough (56.9%) as the most common symptoms in influenza patients, followed by body aches (33.3%) and dyspnoea (29.2%) (33). Headache, myalgia, and fever are important determinants of the severity of the disease. Myalgia is prominent in the calf muscle and the paravertebral and back muscles. In the early days, the patient has a high-grade fever, which decreases and diminishes gradually on the 2nd and 3rd days (11).

In the present study, there was an increased incidence of SARS-CoV-2 disease manifestations in patients with underlying chronic diseases. Hypertension (50.42%) and diabetes mellitus (38.46%) were the top two co-morbidities among the positive SARS-CoV-2 patients, followed by COPD (23.07%). Sharma A et al., reported hypertension (31.8%), diabetes (12.5%), and COPD (4.5%) as common co-morbidities in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients with SARI (19). The most common associated co-morbidities seen in influenza positive patients were COPD (57.14%) and hypertension (42.85%), followed by heart disease (35.71%), diabetes mellitus (14.28%), and CKD (7.14%). A similar study was also conducted by Tong X et al., which showed that influenza was associated with co-morbidities such as hypertension (44.8%), diabetes mellitus (14.9%), COPD (7.5%), cardiovascular diseases (4.5%), malignancy (4.5%), and CKD (1.5%) (33). This association of COVID-19 and influenza with co-morbidities could be due to a lowered immune status because of impairment of macrophage and lymphocyte function (23).

In the present study, 42.73% (50) of SARS-CoV-2 positive SARI patients required ICU care. Among them, 10 (8.54%) received mechanical ventilation, while 8 (6.83%) were on non invasive ventilation. Ismail K et al., conducted a similar study and found that 40% of patients required ICU care, and among them, 14.5% required mechanical ventilation (34). This was also in concordance with a study done by Soni SL et al., in which 1.7% required non invasive ventilation and 2.6% were on invasive ventilation (35). 42.85% of influenza-positive patients in this study required ICU admission, which was in concordance with Choi WI et al., who reported 36.1% of influenza patients requiring intensive care (36). This can be explained by the increased chances of disease progression to multiple organ dysfunction syndromes due to co-morbidities, which necessitated ICU care and ventilator requirements in these patients (16). Mechanical ventilation was mainly required due to respiratory failure refractory to oxygen therapy, although it has a poor outcome (17).

The most common laboratory parameters observed in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients were leukocytosis (98.29%), raised D-dimer (88.88%), raised SGPT (42.73%), raised SGOT (45.29%), raised blood urea (39.31%), raised CRP (43.58%), and raised prothrombin time (21.36%). This was in concordance with similar studies (37),(38),(39). D-dimer elevation is often observed in patients with SARS-CoV-2 due to acute lung injury itself or due to thromboembolic complications that occur frequently in SARS-CoV-2. Regular screening and monitoring of D-dimer reflect disease severity and guide anticoagulation therapy (40). Many authors have shown the possible effect of the SARS-CoV-2 virus on the liver (41),(42). The most common laboratory parameters observed in influenza-positive patients were raised CRP (71.42%), leukopenia (57.14%), anaemia (35.71%), thrombocytopenia (28.57%), raised SGPT (64.28%), and raised SGOT (57.14%), which was in concordance with similar studies (43),(44),(45). CRP is a downstream acute-phase reactant protein that complements the innate immune response. It is produced in influenza infection as a result of the increased synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines to activate the complementary immune response (46).

In the present study, 88.88% of SARS-CoV-2 positive cases were found to have an increased respiratory rate, and 26.49% had hypoxia (SpO2 <92%). In a similar study by Soni SL et al., 31% showed tachypnoea, and 17% had hypoxia (35). Out of 14 influenza-positive patients, 35.71% showed decreased oxygen saturation, and 42.85% showed a raised respiratory rate, which was in concordance with similar studies (47),(48),(49). Hypoxia is a result of ventilation-perfusion ratio mismatch due to a vascular pathology. This hypoxia leads to increased respiratory drive, leading to high work of breathing and hence an increased respiratory rate (50). The clinical implication of this study is that both SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses may cause severe forms of respiratory infections with symptoms like dyspnoea, sore throat, and fever leading to hypoxia and tachypnoea, and may complicate to require mechanical ventilation. This study provides future perspectives for planning appropriate strategies for prevention, control, and treatment modalities to prevent a similar catastrophe in the near future.

Limitation(s)

The study’s limitation was that the results cannot be generalised to the entire population since it was conducted in a single centre. Additionally, the study’s findings are only applicable to the circulating subtypes during that particular season. Influenza A, Influenza A (H1N1), and Influenza A (H3N2) were reported during the season in which the study was conducted, while Influenza B viruses were not reported during that season.

Conclusion

The SARI caused by respiratory viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza is a significant public health concern. This study sheds light on the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients with SARI caused by SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza. These viral infections have demonstrated a wide range of severity and have been associated with various co-morbidities. Timely and early detection of these viral infections can assist healthcare workers in implementing preventive measures, taking specific precautions to reduce transmission, providing appropriate treatments, and delivering supportive care to patients.

References

1.
Zhang S, Zhang W, Tang YW. Molecular diagnosis of viral respiratory infections. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2011;13(2):149-58. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7088847/. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Le YH, Nguyen KC, Coleman KK, Nguyen TT, Than ST, Phan HH, et al. Virus detections among patients with severe acute respiratory illness, Northern Vietnam. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0233117. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32396550/. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Patel A, Jernigan DB. Initial public health response and interim clinical guidance for the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Outbreak-United States, December 31, 2019-February 4, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(5):140-46. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6905e1.htm.
4.
Ghebreyesus TA. World Health Organization. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19-25 May 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/europe/emergencies/situations/covid-19.
5.
Park SE. Epidemiology, virology, and clinical features of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2; Coronavirus Disease-19). Clin Exp Pediatr. 2020;63(4):119. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32252141/. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Sharma K, Aggarwala P, Gandhi D, Mathias A, Singh P, Sharma S, et al. Comparative analysis of various clinical specimens in detection of SARS-CoV-2 using rRT-PCR in new and follow up cases of COVID-19 infection: Quest for the best choice. PLoS One. 2021;16(4):e0249408. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33819290/. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
World Health Organization. Available at: https://covid19.who.int/. (Accessed: 3 February 2023). Available from: https://covid19.who.int/.
8.
Gupta N, Praharaj I, Bhatnagar T, Thangaraj JW, Giri S, Chauhan H, et al. Severe acute respiratory illness surveillance for coronavirus disease 2019, India, 2020. Indian J Med Res. 2020;151(2-3):236. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32362647/. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Ravi Prakash GN, Chakrapani K, Swarna Latha G, Surekha A, Sailaja S, Sudhakar P. Laboratory surveillance of H1N1 swine influenza A virus infection in patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Illness (SARI)-An institutional study. Int J Med Res Rev. 2016;4(2):169-73. Available from: https://ijmrr.medresearch.in/index.php/ijmrr/article/view/454. [crossref]
10.
Flerlage T, Boyd DF, Meliopoulos V, Thomas PG, Schultz-Cherry S. Influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2: Pathogenesis and host responses in the respiratory tract. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19(7):425-41. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-021-00542-7. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Moghadami M. A narrative review of influenza: A seasonal and pandemic disease. Iran J Med Sci. 2017;42(1):2. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5337761/.
12.
Mulpuru S, Li L, Ye L, Hatchette T, Andrew MK, Ambrose A, et al. Effectiveness of influenza vaccination on hospitalizations and risk factors for severe outcomes in hospitalized patients with COPD. Chest. 2019;155(1):69-78. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30616737/. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Uyeki T, Hui D, Zamban M, Wentworth D, Monto A. Influenza. Lancet. 2022;400. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36030813/. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Atmar RL. Influenza viruses: Manual of clinical microbiology. mBio.2023. Available from: https://www.clinmicronow.org/doi/epdf/10.1128/9781683670438.MCM.ch86.
15.
Gjurašin B, Santini M, Krajinovic´ V, Papic´ N, Atelj A, Kotarski V, et al. A retrospective comparison between influenza and COVID-19-associated ARDS in a Croatian tertiary care center. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2021;133(7-8):406-11. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00508-020-01759-x. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Ludwig M, Jacob J, Basedow F, Andersohn F, Walker J. Clinical outcomes and characteristics of patients hospitalized for influenza or COVID-19 in Germany. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;103:316-22. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33279652/. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Aggarwal A, Shrivastava A, Kumar A, Ali A. Clinical and epidemiological features of SARS-CoV-2 patients in SARI ward of a tertiary care centre in New Delhi. J Assoc Physicians India. 2020;68(7):19-26. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32602676/.
18.
Laboratory biosafety manual, 4th edition: Biological safety cabinets and other primary containment devices. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240011335.
19.
Sharma A, Kothari N, Goel AD, Narayanan B, Goyal S, Bhatia P, et al. Clinical features and mortality in COVID-19 SARI versus non COVID-19 SARI cases from Western Rajasthan, India. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10(9):3240. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34760737/. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Agarwal N, Biswas B, Lohani P. Epidemiological determinants of COVID-19 infection and mortality: A study among patients presenting with severe acute respiratory illness during the pandemic in Bihar, India. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2020;27(4):293-301. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33154281/. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Draganescu AC, Miron VD, Streinu-Cercel A, Florea D, Vlaicu O, Bilas¸ co A, et al. Circulation of influenza A viruses among patients hospitalized for severe acute respiratory infection in a tertiary care hospital in Romania in the 2018/19 season: Results from an observational descriptive epidemiological study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(52):01-09. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718231/. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Pariani E, Martinelli M, Canuti M, JazaeriFarsani SM, Oude Munnink BB, Deijs M, et al. Influenza and other respiratory viruses involved in severe acute respiratory disease in northern Italy during the pandemic and postpandemic period (2009-2011). Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:241298. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25013770/. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Khan M, Khan H, Khan S, Nawaz M. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) cases at a screening clinic during the early outbreak period: A single-centre study. J Med Microbiol. 2020;69(8):1114. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32783802/. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Prasad S, Indhu AJ, Margos RA, Philip S. Clinical profile and outcome of H1N1 influenza patients in a tertiary care hospital in Kochi, Kerala. Indian J Respir Care. 2018;7(2):97. Available from: https://www.ijrc.in/doi/IJRC/pdf/10.4103/ijrc.ijrc_18_18. [crossref]
25.
Mehta K, Sharma S, Parikh R. Epidemiological profile of Influenza-A (H1N1) patients screened at a tertiary care hospital in Western India. Indian J Forensic Community Med. 2017;4(2):106-10. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327154639_Epidemiological_profile_of_Influenza_A_H1N1_patients_screened_at_a_tertiary_care_hospital_in_Western_India.
26.
Klein SL, Hodgson A, Robinson DP. Mechanisms of sex disparities in influenza pathogenesis. J Leukoc Biol. 2012;92(1):67-73. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22131346/. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Raut S, Shendre P, Khadse R. A five-year study of Influenza A (H1N1) pandemic 09 from Central India. IP Int J Med Microbiol Trop Dis. 2020;6(1):33-38. Available from: https://www.ijmmtd.org/article-details/11177. [crossref]
28.
Biswas S, Azad KA, Hoque MM, Mowla SG, Banu SS, Sharmin R, et al. Real Time-PCR (RT-PCR) positivity for SARS-CoV-2 in suspected COVID-19 patients presented in a tertiary care hospital. J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg. 2020;38:67-70. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343359258_Real_Time-PCR_RT-PCR_Positivity_for_SARS-CoV-2_in_Suspected_COVID-19_Patients_Presented_in_a_Tertiary_Care_Hospital. [crossref]
29.
Yang L, Liu J, Zhang R, Li M, Li Z, Zhou X, et al. Epidemiological and clinical features of 200 hospitalized patients with corona virus disease 2019 outside Wuhan, China: A descriptive study. J Clin Virol. 2020;129:104475. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7250074/. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Alimohamadi Y, Sepandi M, Taghdir M, Hosamirudsari H. Determine the most common clinical symptoms in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prev Med Hyg. 2020;61(3):E304. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595075/. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497-506. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31986264/. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Zayet S, Lepiller Q, Zahra H, Royer PY, Toko L, Gendrin V, et al. Clinical features of COVID-19 and influenza: A comparative study on Nord Franche-Comte cluster. Microbes Infect. 2020;22(9):481-88. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32561409/. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Tong X, Xu X, Lv G, Wang H, Cheng A, Wang D, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcome of influenza virus infection among adults hospitalized with severe COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study from Wuhan, China. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):01-08. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8040362/. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Ismail K, Bensasi H, Taha A, Nazir A, Abdelkhalek M, Mohamed W, et al. Characteristics and outcome of critically ill patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia admitted to a tertiary care center in the United Arab Emirates during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. A retrospective analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(10):e0251687. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8535183/. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Soni SL, Kajal K, Yaddanapudi LN, Malhotra P, Puri GD, Bhalla A, et al. Demographic & clinical profile of patients with COVID-19 at a tertiary care hospital in north India. Indian J Med Res. 2021;153(1-2):115. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33818468/.[crossref][PubMed]
36.
Choi WI, Yim JJ, Park J, Kim SC, Na MJ, Lee WY, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of H1N1-associated pneumonia among adults in South Korea. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011;15(2):270-75. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/21219693/.
37.
Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507-13. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32007143/. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Berger JS, Kunichoff D, Adhikari S, Ahuja T, Amoroso N, Aphinyanaphongs Y, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of D-dimer elevation in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020;40(10):2539-47. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505147/. [crossref][PubMed]
39.
Kanakaraju K, Pandiyan MS, Ranganathan RS, Asokan A. Prevalence and outcomes of D dimer elevation among the COVID-19 patients in tertiary care hospital, Salem. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10(12):4478. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8884326/. [crossref][PubMed]
40.
Lehmann A, Prosch H, Zehetmayer S, Gysan MR, Bernitzky D, Vonbank K, et al. Impact of persistent D-dimer elevation following recovery from COVID-19. PLoS One. 2021;16(10):e0258351. Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0258351. [crossref][PubMed]
41.
Leulseged TW, Hassen IS, Ayele BT, Tsegay YG, Abebe DS, Edo MG, et al. Laboratory biomarkers of COVID-19 disease severity and outcome: Findings from a developing country. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0246087. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33720944/. [crossref][PubMed]
42.
Kumar A, Kumar P, Dungdung A, Gupta AK, Anurag A, Kumar A. Pattern of liver function and clinical profile in COVID-19: A cross-sectional study of 91 patients. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(6):1951-54. Available from: https://pubmed. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33039937/. [crossref][PubMed]
43.
Fica A, Sotomayor V, Fasce R, Dabanch J, Soto A, Charpentier P, et al. Severe Acute Respiratory Infections (SARI) from influenza in adult patients in Chile: The experience of a sentinel hospital. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2019;43:e1. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6393720/. [crossref][PubMed]
44.
Yang K, Zhang N, Gao C, Qin H, Wang A, Song L. Risk factors for hospital- acquired influenza A and patient characteristics: A matched case-control study. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):1-0. Available from: https://bmcinfectdis. biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-020-05580-9. [crossref][PubMed]
45.
Ünal S, Gökçe M, Aytaç-Elmas S, Karabulut E, Altan I, Özkaya-Parlakay A, et al. Hematological consequences of pandemic influenza H1N1 infection: A single center experience. Turk J Pediatr. 2010;52(6):570. Available from: https://europepmc.org/article/med/21428187.
46.
Vasileva D, Badawi A. C-reactive protein as a biomarker of severe H1N1 influenza. Inflamm Res. 2019;68(1):39-46. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/30288556/. [crossref][PubMed]
47.
Murray EL, Khagayi S, Ope M, Bigogo G, Ochola R, Muthoka P, et al. What are the most sensitive and specific sign and symptom combinations for influenza in patients hospitalized with acute respiratory illness? Results from western Kenya, January 2007–July 2010. Epidemiol Infect. 2013;141(1):212-22. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22417876/. [crossref][PubMed]
48.
Hien TT, Liem NT, Dung NT, San LT, Mai PP, Chau NV, et al. Avian influenza A (H5N1) in 10 patients in Vietnam. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(12):1179-88. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14985470/. [crossref][PubMed]
49.
Chow EJ, Tenforde MW, Rolfes MA, Lee B, Chodisetty S, Ramirez JA, et al. Differentiating severe and non-severe lower respiratory tract illness in patients hospitalized with influenza: Development of the Influenza Disease Evaluation and Assessment of Severity (IDEAS) scale. PLoS One. 2021;16(10):e0258482. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8530291/. [crossref][PubMed]
50.
Nitsure M, Sarangi B, Shankar GH, Reddy VS, Walimbe A, Sharma V, et al. Mechanisms of hypoxia in COVID-19 patients: A pathophysiologic reflection. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020;24(10):967. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689135/.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64041.18578

Date of Submission: Mar 21, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 12, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 13, 2023
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 24, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 20, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Sep 11, 2023 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com