Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 39146

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : October | Volume : 17 | Issue : 10 | Page : BC17 - BC22 Full Version

Comparison of Serum Calcium, Magnesium, and Zinc amongst Preeclampsia and Normotensive Pregnant Women attending a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Tripura, Northeast India


Published: October 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/66208.18547
Dipanwita Roy, Sutapa Das, Jayanta Ray, Partha Sarathi Pal

1. Senior Resident, Department of Biochemistry, Agartala Government Medical College, Agartala, Tripura, India. 2. Medical Officer, Indira Gandhi Memorial Hospital, Agartala, Tripura, India. 3. Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Agartala Government Medical College, Agartala, Tripura, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Agartala Government Medical College, Agartala, Tripura, India.

Correspondence Address :
Partha Sarathi Pal,
Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Agartala Government Medical College, Agartala-799006, Tripura, India.
E-mail: drparthapal65@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Preeclampsia is one of the most frequently encountered medical complications of pregnancy. If left untreated, it exerts serious medical complications for both the mother as well as baby. As a multifactorial progressive disease, identifying potential biomarkers for predicting preeclampsia is crucial for disease stratification and targeted therapy. There is a growing interest in early detection of micronutrient deficiencies, such as calcium, magnesium, and zinc, to understand the causes of preeclampsia development.

Aim: To compare the serum levels of calcium, magnesium, and zinc in women with preeclampsia and normotensive pregnant women attending Agartala Government Medical College and Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital, Agartala, Tripura, India.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted at Agartala Government Medical College, Agartala, Tripura, India, from January 2020 to December 2021. The study included primigravida women aged between 18 and 35 years, in their third trimester of pregnancy, with a singleton pregnancy. Sixty preeclampsia patients and 60 normotensive pregnant women were enrolled, and various biochemical parameters like serum calcium, magnesium, zinc, uric acid, urea, creatinine, Alanine Transaminase (ALT), and Aspartate Transaminase (AST) were analysed. Data were statistically analysed using the student t-test and Chi-square test.

Results: The mean age (in years), gestational age (in weeks), and Body Mass Index (BMI) (Kg/m2) of the study subjects and control group were 26.02±4.69 and 23.4±3.81, 34.78±2.41 and 33.51±2.79, and 27.97±3.82 and 26.03±4.26, respectively. The authors observed that the levels of biochemical parameters like serum creatinine, AST, ALT, and uric acid were increased in preeclampsia. Furthermore, the serum concentrations of calcium, magnesium, and zinc were significantly decreased in preeclampsia.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that preeclamptic women have reduced levels of serum calcium, zinc, and magnesium compared to normal pregnant women. Therefore, dietary supplementation of these essential nutrients, either individually or in combination, may help prevent preeclampsia at an early stage and improve foetal outcomes.

Keywords

Foetal outcome, Hypertension, Micronutrients, Oxidative stress, Pregnancy

Preeclampsia, one of the most frequently encountered medical complications of pregnancy, is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. This progressive multifactorial disorder is characterised by the development of new-onset hypertension, with blood pressure reaching 140/90 mmHg or higher, along with proteinuria ≥300 mg per 24 hours or urinary protein to creatinine ratio ≥0.3, or persistent dipstick 1+ proteinuria after 20 weeks of gestation in a previously normotensive and non-proteinuric pregnant woman (1).

In developing countries, a woman is seven times more likely to develop preeclampsia as a woman in a developed country, and 10%-25% of these cases are likely to result in maternal death (2). India’s third National Family Health Survey (NFHS 3) reported that the eastern and northeastern states had the highest incidence of preeclampsia, with prevalence ratios for preeclampsia symptoms showing almost a threefold variation between the lowest prevalence state (Haryana 18.5%) and the highest prevalence state (Tripura 49.4%) (3).

Although the exact aetiology of preeclampsia remains enigmatic to date, a growing body of evidence supports the understanding that the disease begins in the uteroplacental unit, is amplified by oxidative stress, and results in vascular endothelial dysfunction and vasospasm (4). Several dietary deficiencies have also been implicated in the development of preeclampsia and in harming the pregnant mother and growing foetus, especially in developing countries with a high prevalence of preeclampsia (5),(6). Possible reasons for the association of low serum calcium levels with preeclampsia may include the stimulation of renin and parathyroid hormone release, which elevates the intracellular concentration of calcium in vascular smooth muscles, inducing generalised vasoconstriction (7).

Generally, magnesium has been known as an essential cofactor for many enzyme systems. Hence, deficiency of this element may hamper the proper functioning of antioxidant enzymes, leading to oxidative stress. Decreased levels of magnesium during pregnancy might increase the vasoconstrictor response of numerous neurohormonal agents, including epinephrine, norepinephrine, angiotensin-II, serotonin, and bradykinin, thereby increasing blood pressure (8). Zinc is one of the trace elements directly involved in lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress, culminating in endothelial dysfunction, the hallmark of preeclampsia. Additionally, zinc deficiency may induce high blood pressure by promoting sodium reabsorption through increased Na+ Cl- co-transporter expression (9),(10). Hence, screening blood tests during antenatal check-ups to evaluate the concentration of these micronutrients might prove beneficial in preventing the occurrence of preeclampsia and reducing the disease burden to some extent.

Studies and data regarding the association between preeclampsia and changes in micronutrient levels are very infrequent in the North East (NE) region of our country. From this perspective, the present study was conducted to assess the levels of calcium, magnesium, and zinc amongst preeclamptic and normotensive pregnant women attending Agartala Government Medical College and Gobinda Ballabh Pant Hospital, Agartala, Tripura, India. The study also aimed to determine whether there were any alterations in the concentration of these nutrients based on the socioeconomic status (11) of the pregnant women. Such information may be helpful for early detection of preeclampsia and timely management thereof.

Material and Methods

This was a hospital-based observational cross-sectional study conducted at Agartala Government Medical College and Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital (AGMC and GBP Hospital) in collaboration between the Department of Biochemistry and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Agartala Government Medical College and Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital, Agartala, Tripura, India. The study took place from January 2020 to December 2021 after receiving approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (Ref.No.4(6-11)-AGMC/Medical Education/Ethics Com./2018 Dated 2nd December 2019). The institution serves as the tertiary care teaching hospital of Tripura and receives referrals from all other hospitals in the state.

Inclusion criteria: The study group comprised of primigravida women aged between 18 and 35 years, with alive singleton pregnancies in their third trimester (beyond 28 weeks), diagnosed with preeclampsia according to the guidelines by the ACOG task force on hypertension in pregnancy, and willing to participate in the study (1). The comparison group included normotensive pregnant women in the same age group, parity, and gestational period, who were also willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients were excluded if they had one or more of the following conditions: i) chronic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or any major systemic illness; ii) patients admitted with obstetric emergencies; and iii) patients unwilling to participate in the study.

Sample size: The authors planned to study three variables, namely serum calcium, magnesium, and zinc, in preeclampsia patients, with an equal number of normotensive individuals in the same age group, parity, and gestational period. For sample size calculation, one of the three continuous response variables (serum zinc) from independent control and study subjects with a 1:1 ratio was taken into consideration. In a study conducted by Al-Jameil N et al., the response for serum zinc in each subject group was normally distributed with a standard deviation of 0.83 (9). If the mean difference between the study and control groups is 0.6, it would be necessary to study 58 subjects in each group to be able to reject the null hypothesis that the means of both groups are equal with a power of 90%. The type 1 error associated with the test of this null hypothesis is considered 1%.

The sample size calculation was performed using the formula:

n=2[(a+b)2σ2]/(μ12)2

Where:
n=the sample size in each group
μ1=mean in Group-1
μ2=mean in Group-2
s=standard deviation (SD)
a=conventional multiplier for alpha (2.58)
b=conventional multiplier for power (1.28)

Data collection: After obtaining written informed consent from each participant, a thorough history was taken, followed by a general physical examination. Blood pressure was measured on the 18right arm with the patient lying on her side at a 45° angle to the horizontal. An obstetrical examination was then carried out, and all the data and findings were recorded in a pre-structured case record sheet. Preeclampsia patients were categorised into mild (Systolic Blood Pressure [SBP] 140-149 mmHg or Diastolic Blood Pressure [DBP] 90-99 mmHg), moderate (SBP 150-159 mmHg or DBP 100-109 mmHg), and severe (SBP ≥160 mmHg or DBP ≥110 mmHg) according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines from 2011 (12).

For the study, blood samples were collected to estimate serum calcium, magnesium, and zinc, along with routine antenatal hematological and biochemical tests. Using aseptic measures, 5 mL of blood was drawn preferably from the antecubital vein using a sterile needle and syringe. The blood samples were placed in different sterile containers (EDTA/Fluoride/Clot activator) and allowed to clot at room temperature. Serum was then separated from the cells by centrifuging at 3000 rpm for 3-5 minutes. The analysis of the samples was done on the same day. Various biochemical parameters like Serum urea, creatinine, uric acid, ALP, and ASP were performed on a fully automated clinical chemistry analyser (XL-640, Transasia Biomedicals Ltd., Mumbai), while special tests like serum calcium, magnesium, and zinc were analysed using a spectrophotometer (Eppendorf BioPhotometer D30) (Table/Fig 1) (13),(14),(15),(16),(17),(18),(19).

Urine samples were also collected from the study subjects for urinalysis and protein measurement. A 10-12 mL freshly voided urine sample was collected in clean, sterile universal containers. In this study, proteinuria was determined using multiple reagent strips (dipstick) for all participants and interpreted as shown in (Table/Fig 2) (20).

Statistical Analysis

The results were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0. Categorical data were presented as mean±standard deviation. The significance of the difference between the groups was compared using the Student t-test. The chi-square test was used to compare the socioeconomic status and clinical characteristics between the groups. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Karl Pearson correlation was used to study the correlation of variables in preeclampsia cases.

Results

This study revealed that the majority of the normotensive group belonged to the middle class, whereas in the case of preeclamptic patients, the majority was from the poor economic class. The comparison of gestational age between the cases and the control group showed a statistically significant difference. There was also a significant difference in age between both groups (Table/Fig 3).

There was a significant statistical difference in BMI (kg/m2), SBP, and DBP between the two groups. Regarding the biochemical analysis, the serum urea, uric acid, creatinine, AST, and ALT levels were found to be increased in preeclamptic women. However, no statistically significant difference was observed in serum creatinine content or the activities of transaminases. The levels of mean serum total calcium, magnesium, and zinc in preeclampsia patients were significantly lower in comparison to normotensive pregnant women (Table/Fig 4).

The comparison of nutrient deficiencies between both groups showed a higher number of hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, and hypozincemia in the preeclampsia patients compared to the normotensive controls. The presence of these nutrient deficiencies was also found to be more common in individuals belonging to comparatively lower socioeconomic classes (Table/Fig 5).

The preeclamptic patients in this study were categorised into three different categories (mild, moderate, and severe) of preeclampsia. Hypocalcemia and hypozincemia were present in the majority of significantsubjects with severe preeclampsia. The deficiency levels of each of the study nutrients in various categories were highlighted in (Table/Fig 6).

The Pearson correlation of SBP and DBP individually with serum calcium, magnesium, and zinc levels showed a negative correlation between blood pressure and the study nutrients (Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8),(Table/Fig 9),(Table/Fig 10),(Table/Fig 11),(Table/Fig 12),(Table/Fig 13).

Discussion

Considering the socioeconomic profiles, it can be inferred that lower socioeconomic status may be a risk factor for preeclampsia, which is consistent with a study conducted by Mostafe HM (21). In the present study, 8 normotensive women had proteinuria, out of which six women were at 37-40 weeks gestation. Three of the women with proteinuria were suffering from urinary tract infections. Furthermore, in the present study, the majority (50%) of the preeclampsia patients belonged to the older age range compared to normotensive pregnant women, which supports previous reports that advanced maternal age may be a risk factor for the development of preeclampsia (22),(23).

When analysing the BMI among the study participants, it was found that women with preeclampsia had a significantly higher BMI compared to the normotensive group, which is consistent with the study by Motedayen M (24). In this study, the majority of preeclamptic women (48%) were overweight (BMI ≥25 kg/m2), 27% were obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2), and only 25% had a normal BMI (18.5-24.9 kg/m2). On the other hand, in the control group, the majority of pregnant women (60%) had a normal BMI, 27% were overweight, and only 8% were obese.

In preeclampsia, glomerular endotheliosis and spasms of glomerular arterioles result in reduced renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate (25%), and impaired tubular reabsorption or secretory function (20). This study indicates an association between preeclampsia and higher serum urea levels, which is consistent with an earlier study by Aslan Cetin B et al., (25).

An association between higher serum creatinine and uric acid levels and preeclampsia was observed in this study, which is similar to the observations made by Ambad RS and Dhok DA, and Skakarami A et al., (26),(27). In preeclampsia, elevated levels of uric acid are not only attributed to decreased renal excretion but also increased oxidative stress resulting from placental ischaemia and increased activity of xanthine oxidase. The findings of this study also indicate that both the mean serum AST and ALT levels are more than double in preeclamptic women compared to normotensive pregnant women, which is consistent with the findings of Anusha T and Sankaranarayana T (28).

In the present study, a significant reduction in mean serum calcium levels in preeclamptic women (67%) is evident compared to normal pregnant women, similar to the observations made by Kangal DV et al., and Saeed S et al., (7),(29). Two women in the control group with hypocalcemia had a history of polycystic ovarian syndrome, which may be a possible cause of vitamin D deficiency and subsequent hypocalcemia. Additionally, three women belonged to the Muslim community, in which hypocalcemia may be attributed to the practice of purdah and subsequent vitamin D deficiency. A study on a group of healthy pregnant women living in Dhaka reported that low vitamin D levels, classified as “deficiency,” severely affected 2.1%, affected 60.7%, and classified as “insufficiency,” affected 31.4% of the individuals studied, in which the practice of purdah may have played an important role (30). Three normotensive women with hypocalcemia had a history of hyperemesis gravidarum, four women had a history of gastritis and constipation, leading to irregular intake of calcium and iron-folic acid (IFA) tablets. Additionally, one woman was allergic to milk and milk products.

Serum magnesium levels in preeclampsia patients in this study significantly decreased (53%) compared to normal pregnant women, which is consistent with the findings of Reddy HK et al., (31). In the normotensive control group with hypomagnesemia, three women had a history of recurrent episodes of gastritis and had been taking proton pump inhibitors since the first trimester. Four women with hypomagnesemia were found to have anemia, and another woman had suffered from Coronavirus Disease-2019(COVID-19) pneumonia associated with a diarrhoeal episode, nausea, and vomiting.

A significant reduction in the mean serum zinc level is evident in the preeclamptic study group (78%) compared to normal pregnant women, which is similar to the findings of a previous study by Martadiansyah A et al., (32). Among the control subjects with hypozincemia, four were found to have intrauterine growth retardation as suggested by ultrasonography reports. Stratification of data on serum calcium, magnesium, and zinc in various categories of preeclampsia revealed an association between the gradually decreasing levels of these nutrient elements with the increase in disease severity.

Considering the correlation of severity, when serum calcium, magnesium, and zinc levels of preeclamptic patients are individually correlated with Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), a negative correlation is obtained, emphasising the fact that hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, and hypozincemia may have a strong relationship with both the risk of developing preeclampsia and disease severity.

Limitation(s)

The dietary habits of study participants were not examined in depth; hence, more research is recommended in different settings to determine the predictive ability of these critical nutrients for the early detection of preeclampsia.

Conclusion

The present study findings demonstrate a significant association between elevated maternal serum uric acid and preeclampsia. The study also identified reduced levels of serum calcium, zinc, and magnesium in preeclamptic women compared to normal pregnant women. These findings suggest that insufficient intake of these essential nutrients, either individually or in combination, may contribute to the development of preeclampsia. Additionally, the severity of the disease can be assessed using these indicators. Therefore, timely dietary supplementation of these nutrients could be explored to prevent preeclampsia and improve foetal outcomes. In conclusion, maternal serum calcium, magnesium, zinc, and uric acid levels show promise as indicators for predicting or detecting preeclampsia. Further studies evaluating hypocalcemia in normotensive pregnant women would be beneficial.

Acknowledgement

The authors extend their sincere gratitude to the late Prof. (Dr.) Rohini Kanta Goswami, Former Professor and Head of the Department of Biochemistry at Agartala Government Medical College, for the initial guidance and encouragement provided during the execution of this study. They are also grateful to the staff of GBP Hospital and MRU, AGMC, for their assistance during the study period.

References

1.
ACOG. Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ task force on hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(5):1122-31.
2.
Kurniawan K, Cathleen F, Lieana C, Miranda AV. Maternal factors associated with preeclampsia among Asian: Systematic review of large cohort studies. J Asian Med Stud Assoc. 2018;6(1).
3.
International Institute for Population Sciences. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-06: India (2 v.+ suppl.). Intl Institute for Population Sciences; 2007.
4.
Aouache R, Biquard L, Vaiman D, Miralles F. Oxidative stress in preeclampsia and placental diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(5):1496. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Mistry HD, Gill CA, Kurlak LO, Seed PT, Hesketh JE, Méplan C, et al; SCOPE consortium. Association between maternal micronutrient status, oxidative stress, and common genetic variants in antioxidant enzymes at 15 weeks’ gestation in nulliparous women who subsequently develop preeclampsia. Free Rad Bio Med. 2015;78:147-55. Doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.10.580. Epub 2014 Nov 6. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Amirabi A, Yazdian M, Pashapour N. Evaluation of serum calcium, magnesium, copper, and zinc levels in women with pre-eclampsia. Iran J Med Sci. 2015;33(4):231-34.
7.
Kanagal DV, Rajesh A, Rao K, Devi UH, Shetty H, Kumari S, et al. Levels of serum calcium and magnesium in pre-eclamptic and normal pregnancy: A study from Coastal India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(7):OC01. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Fang X, Wang H, Liu Z, Chen J, Tan H, Liang Y, et al. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in preeclampsia and eclampsia: The role of hypomagnesemia. Seizure. 2020;76:12-16. Doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.01.003. Online ahead of print. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Al-Jameil N, Tabassum H, Ali MN, Qadeer MA, Khan FA, Al-Rashed M. Correlation between serum trace elements and risk of preeclampsia: A case-control study in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2017;24(6):1142-48. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Williams CR, Mistry M, Cheriyan AM, Williams JM, Naraine MK, Ellis CL, et al. Zinc deficiency induces hypertension by promoting renal Na+ reabsorption. Am J Physiol-Renal Physiol. 2019;316(4):F646-53. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Park K. In: Park’s Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine. Twenty-fifth Edition. Jabalpur: Banarsidas Bhanot Publishers, 2019. ISBN: 978-93-82219-15-6.
12.
National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health (UK). Hypertension in pregnancy: The management of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy. London: RCOG Press; 2010 Aug. PMID: 22220321.
13.
Talke HS, Schubest GE. Enzymatic urea determination in the blood and serum in the Warburg optical test. Klin Wochenschr. 1965;43:174-75. Doi: 10.1007/BF01484513. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Börner U, Szasz G, Bablok W, Busch EW. A specific fully enzymatic method for creatinine: Reference values in serum (author’s transl). J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1979;17(11):679-82. [crossref]
15.
Henry RJ, Connon DC, Winkelman JW. (eds), Clinical Chemistry: Principles and Technies. Hagerstown (Md.): Medical Deptt; Harper & Row, 1974. Available at: https://www.scirp.org/(S(lz5mqp453edsnp55rrgjct55))/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=2636801.
16.
Thomas L. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate aminotransferase (AST). Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics. 1st ed. Frankfurt: TH-Books Verlagsgesellschaft; 1998;2:55-65.
17.
Gitelman HJ. An improved automated procedure for the determination of calcium in biological specimens. Analytical Biochemistry. 1967;18(3):521-31. [crossref]
18.
Gindler EM, Heth DA. Colorimetric determination with bound calmagite of magnesium in human blood serum. Clin Chem. 1971;17:662. Available at: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO1993003100A1/en.
19.
Makino T. A sensitive, direct colorimetric assay of serum zinc using nitro-PAPS and microwell plates. Clin Chem Acta. 1991;197(3):209-20. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Dutta DC, Konar H. In: Textbook of Obstetrics. Eighth Edition. Kolkata: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd., 2015. ISBN: 978-93-5152-723.
21.
Mostafa HM, Youssef AE, Samia SM, Dina M. Effect of socioeconomic status on preeclampsia cross-sectional study. Med J Cairo Univ. 2018;86(7):4227-34. [crossref]
22.
Owiredu WK, Ahenkorah L, Turpin CA, Amidu N, Laing EF. Putative risk factors of pregnancy-induced hypertension among Ghanaian pregnant women. J Med Biomed Sci. 2012;1(3):62-76.
23.
Kumar H, Prabhu A, Sudha K. Assessment of serum cations in normal and preeclampsia pregnancies: A cross sectional comparative study. Indian J Public Health Research & Development. 2020;11(5):484-88.
24.
Motedayen M, Rafiei M, Tavirani MR, Sayehmiri K, Dousti M. The relationship between body mass index and preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Intl J Reprod Biomed. 2019;17(7):463-72. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Aslan Cetin B, AydoganMathyk B, Cift T, Tuten A, Bulut B, Yilmaz N, et al. Serum collectrin levels in patients with early-and late-onset preeclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(21):2827-31. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Ambad RS, Dhok DA. The role of serum urea, creatinine, uric acid in diagnosis of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Int J Med Biomed Stud. 2019;3(9):77-80. [crossref]
27.
Shakarami A, Ghafarzadeh M, Yari F, Fathi L. Association between maternal serum uric acid and preeclampsia. Arch Physiol Biochem. 2022;128(6):1434-37. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Anusha T, Sankaranarayana T. Study of serum calcium, magnesium, uric acid and liver enzymes in pregnancy induced hypertension. J Evolution Med Dent Sci. 2018;7(11):1347-53. [crossref]
29.
Saeed S, Jamal A, Rafiq F, Rafiq F, Jamal A. Frequency of hypocalcaemia in women with preeclampsia at a tertiary care hospital. Pak J Med Heal Sci. 2017;11(2):773-76.
30.
Asaduzzaman M, Basak MR, Islam MS, Juliana FM, Ferdous T, Islam MJ, et al. Vitamin D deficiency and Insufficiency in healthy pregnant women living in Dhaka, Bangladesh. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2018;17(6):66-73.
31.
Reddy HK, Vineela P, Chowdary BM. Study of serum lipid profile and magnesium in preeclampsia. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2019;8(4):1445-50. [crossref]
32.
Martadiansyah A, Maulina P, Mirani P, Kaprianti T. Zinc serum maternal levels as a risk factor for preeclampsia. Bioscientia Medicina: J Biomed Translational Research. 2021;5(7):693-701.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/66208.18547

Date of Submission: Jun 24, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jul 26, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 05, 2023
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 25, 2023
• Manual Googling: Sep 02, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Sep 03, 2023 (17%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com