Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 5127

Original article / research
Year : 2017 | Month : April | Volume : 11 | Issue : 4 | Page : RC08 - RC13

Interlocking Nailing Versus Plating in Tibial Shaft Fractures in Adults: A Comparative Study

Sagnik Mukherjee, Mahendra Singh Arambam, Sanjib Waikhom, Santosha, Pranav Vitthal Masatwar, Rohan Gautam Maske

1. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Orthopaedics, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India. 2. Professor, Department ofOrthopaedics, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India. 4. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Orthopaedics, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India. 5. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Orthopaedics, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India. 6. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Orthopaedics, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sagnik Mukherjee,
Room No. 109, Gents Hostel No 5, RIMS Campus, Lamphelpat, Imphal-795004, Manipur, India.
E-mail: mukherjeesagnik134@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Tibial diaphyseal fractures are the commonest long bone fractures in adults, most commonly managed by intramedullary interlocking nailing. However, several meta-analysis show that locking plate osteosynthesis is equally effective in managing tibial diaphyseal fractures and are associated with less number of complications.

Aim: To compare the results of fixation of tibial fractures following plating and nailing in terms of union, patient satisfaction and complications.

Materials and Methods: A hospital based non randomized clinical trial was performed from September 2013 to August 2016 where closed or open diaphyseal or metaphyseo- diaphyseal fractures of the tibia (closed or open Gustilo Anderson type 1 through 3B) were included. Simple sequential allocation was used for allotting the patients to two groups, one for interlocking nailing and other for plating. The patients were followed up for clinical, radiographic and functional results.

Results: Forty patients with forty one involved limbs completed follow up for one year. The duration of surgery and average blood loss during surgery was 75.45±3.03 minutes and 165.00±5.31 ml respectively in case of nailing and 85.05±2.54 minutes and184.29±5.33 ml respectively in case of plating and their difference was statistically significant. In our study union was achieved in less than 20 weeks in 29 (70.8%) of the patients and 25-30 weeks in nine (22%) cases. The average time of union in our study was 19.55±0.69 weeks in case of interlocking nailing and 20.38±1.39 weeks in case of plating and there was no statistically significant difference between the two. However, there is statistically significant difference in the functional score in between the two groups in terms of Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS). Delayed union in one case of nailing and two cases of plating, valgus malunion in one case of nailing and joint stiffness in two cases each of nailing and plating were the major complications observed.

Conclusion: There was no difference between the two modalities in terms of fracture union. Complications were lesser but more serious in case of plating. Patient satisfaction was more with plating.

Keywords

Bone nails, Bone plates, Fracture fixation

How to cite this article :

Sagnik Mukherjee, Mahendra Singh Arambam, Sanjib Waikhom, Santosha, Pranav Vitthal Masatwar, Rohan Gautam Maske. INTERLOCKING NAILING VERSUS PLATING IN TIBIAL SHAFT FRACTURES IN ADULTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research [serial online] 2017 April [cited: 2017 Jun 27 ]; 11:RC08-RC13. Available from
http://www.jcdr.net/back_issues.asp?issn=0973-709x&year=2017&month=April&volume=11&issue=4&page=RC08-RC13&id=9746

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25577.9746


Date of Submission: Nov 22, 2016
Date of Peer Review: Dec 19, 2016
Date of Acceptance: Feb 06, 2017
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2017


Financial OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS: None.

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • PubMed Central® (PMC)New
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Chemical Abstracts Service
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • EBSCOhostNew
  • Embase & EMbiology
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Open J-Gate
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • SCOPUS
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com