Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 178811

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : May | Volume : 18 | Issue : 5 | Page : OC38 - OC42 Full Version

Risk Factors and Angiographic Syntax Score among Young Adults and Middle-aged Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: May 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/67673.19415
Rajashekhar Varma Gande, Vanajakshamma Velam, Rajasekhar Durgaprasad, Sowjenya Gopal

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Cardiology, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India. 2. Senior Professor, Department of Cardiology, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India. 3. Senior Professor and Head, Department of Cardiology, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India. 4. Guest Faculty, Department of Biotechnology, Thiruvalluvar University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Vanajakshamma Velam,
Senior Professor, Department of Cardiology, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati-517502, Andhra Pradesh, India.
E-mail: vanajavelam1966@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) has become a major clinical and public health problem, with an increasing incidence and prevalence, particularly among the young adult population. Although there are well-established prevention strategies for reducing the incidence of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), their effectiveness is diminished by several risk factors.

Aim: To investigate traditional and lifestyle CVD risk factors in young adults (18-30 years) and middle-aged (31-45 years) patients and to correlate them with the angiographic profile using the syntax score in these patients.

Materials and Methods: The study was designed as a cross-sectional study conducted at the Cardiology Department, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences (SVIMS), Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India, a teritary care teaching hospital during the period of August 2021 to July 2022. A total of 87 patients were included based on the study criteria. The study population was divided into two groups: Group-I (18-30 years) and Group-II (31-45 years). After obtaining informed consent, details regarding coronary risk factors such as smoking, Diabetes Mellitus (DM), hypertension, dyslipidaemia, obesity, family history of CAD, and details including physical inactivity were recorded. Coronary Angiography (CAG) was performed to determine obstructive coronary lesions, and the syntax score was calculated. All the collected data were recorded in Excel spreadsheets, and statistical analysis was carried out using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences version 25.0 software.

Results: A male preponderance was observed in the study population (84%) with a mean age of 38.7±5.5 years, and the youngest patient was a 19-year-old female. The majority of patients, 79 (90.8%), were in the middle-age group. Dyslipidaemia (94%) was the predominant modifiable risk factor in the study population (p<0.05), followed by obesity (65.5%). About half of the patients had smoking as the predisposing risk factor for CAD. The majority of patients presented with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) (76.9%). Single Vessel Disease (SVD) was the most common finding (70.1%), and the common culprit vessel was the Left Anterior Descending (LAD) artery (24.1%). The angiographic syntax score was low (<16) in 70 (80.5%) of the patients, with only 6 (7%) of the patients having a higher syntax score (>22). The correlation of the mean syntax score with risk factors has shown an association with obesity (10.6), physical inactivity (10.6), followed by diabetes (10.5).

Conclusion: The study showed that middle age, male gender, and lifestyle risk factors including dyslipidaemia, obesity, physical inactivity, and smoking seem to correlate with angiographic lesions and CAD incidence. Therefore, the inclusion of healthy lifestyle changes such as regular physical activity and the control of modifiable risk factors, including smoking cessation, in this vulnerable middle-aged group is warranted.

Keywords

Coronary artery disease, Coronary angiography, Dyslipidaemia, Obesity

Early onset of CAD is increasing over the past few decades. It is more prevalent in South Asians than in the Western population (1). The underlying pathogenicity for the early incidence of CAD, especially in South Asians, is not fully understood (2). Most of the knowledge about risk factors for CAD has been acquired from Western studies (3),(4),(5), and only limited data is available from India. Reports have revealed that risk factors for CAD among Asian Indians are 3-4 times higher than in other populations. Moreover, a conservative calculation ascertains that about 30 million CAD patients are expected in India (6),(7). The most concerning aspects of early CAD incidence are the increasing trend of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), hospitalisation, and death rates (8). The key drivers of CAD are mostly one or more modifiable risk factors like diabetes, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, and smoking. In Indians, the risk of developing CAD appears at a young age, and women also have a similar risk to that of men. Previous studies have shown that certain risk factors such as family history, obesity, dyslipidaemia, and the use of tobacco products are more potent predictors of outcomes of CAD in young individuals than in older counterparts (9),(10). Currently, most of the CVD risk profile assessments use age-old risk calculation tools that have been shown to underestimate the risk in young patients (11),(12). In addition to the traditional risk factors, the presentation of STEMI in young patients (35 years) was observed to be interconnected with abuse habits and non-convential risk factors. CAG data from a previous study indicate a preponderance of SVD or non-obstructive CAD in very young patients suffering from Acute Myocardial Infarcton (AMI) (13). However, differences in the inherent characteristics of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) presentation and CAG findings in young patients have not been studied compared to the elderly ACS patient population. This suggests the need for detailed risk assessment and improved identification of high-risk patients for early intervention (4). Therefore, it is important to assess the risk profile in young patients presenting with CAD. The study aimed to investigate angiographic characteristics through syntax score calculation and correlate them with the risk factor profile of the ≤45 years of age CAD patients presenting to the tertiary healthcare center.

Material and Methods

It was a cross-sectional study carried out at the Cardiology Department, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences (SVIMS), Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India, a tertiary care teaching hospital during the period of August 2021 to July 2022. The study was approved and accepted by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) with the registration number Roc.No. AS/12/TPAC/SVIMS/2017. All the patients were explained about the study, and written informed consent was obtained from the study population.

Sample size calculation: Sample size was calculated by using the standard formula with the Confidence Interval (CI)

Sample size= Z1-α/22p(1-p)/d2

95%, error 5% (0.05), and the cardiac risk score in young-middle aged (20-59 years) with border line score was taken as 6% (0.06) (14).
Where,

Z1-α a/2=standard normal variate at 5% type 1 error=1.96
p=Cardiac risk score 6%
d=Absolute error or precision=5%

Inclusion criteria:

• Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)
• Non ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI)
• Unstable Angina (USA)
• Chronic stable angina.
• Patients aged between 18 and 45 years of both genders.
• Patients willing to participate.

Exclusion criteria:

• Patients aged >45 years
• Patients who underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) or Coronary Bypass Surgery (CABG) previously.
• Previous Myocardial Infarction (MI)

Study Procedure

Detailed demographic and clinical data, including the history of smoking, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, obesity, details of physical inactivity, and family history of CAD, were documented. All the patients were subjected to routine haematological and biochemical investigations, including troponin-I (0-0.04 ng/mL), HbA1c (<5.7%), fasting lipid profile (70 mg/dL-100 mg/dL). They were evaluated with electrocardiogram (ECG) and echocardiogram examinations. The study population was divided into two groups: Group-I: 18-30 years (young age); and Group-II: 31-45 years (middle age).

Coronary Angiographic (CAG) analysis: CAG was performed using standard percutaneous techniques either via the femoral or radial route after Allen’s test. CAG was performed based on the American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology indications for CAG (12).

Syntax score: The angiographic profile was obtained by calculating the syntax score. Each coronary lesion with a >50% luminal obstruction in vessels >1.5 mm is scored separately, and the scores were summed to provide the overall syntax score. Syntax score was calculated by a computer program consisting of sequential and interactive self-guided questions. The algorithm consists of twelve main questions. They can be divided into two groups: The first three determine the dominance, the total number of lesions, and the vessel segments involved per lesion, and they appear once. The last nine questions refer to adverse lesion characteristics and are repeated for each lesion. Angiographic severity was assessed in at least two orthogonal views using eye-balling, and the syntax score was calculated (15).

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics for the categorical variables were performed by computing the means and frequencies in each category. Continuous variables were expressed as mean±Standard Deviation (SD). A 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was estimated, and a global significance level of α=5% was chosen. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered significant. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS software version 25.0) was used.

Results

Among the 87 patients included in the study, the majority were males (n=73). The mean age of the study population was 38.7±5.5 years. In both genders, the mean age of males and females was 39.2±4.9 and 36.7±7.7 years, respectively. Most patients, 79 (90.8%) were in the age group of 31-45 years (Group-II). Group-II was observed to be the predominant age range among patients. The mean age of this group was 40.11±3.5 years (Table/Fig 1).

The prevalence of dyslipidaemia was predominant in patients, accounting for 94% (n=82), with Group-II constituting 88.5%. High Density Lipid (HDL) cholesterol levels were low in most patients (65.5%), followed by higher levels of triglycerides (61%). Obesity was observed in 57 patients (65.5%). These findings suggest a concurrent relationship between lifestyle and traditional risk factors. Diabetes and hypertension were found to be secondary traditional risk factors in this population, accounting for 34.5% each. Young patients (Group-I) (aged 18-30 years) were less likely to have hypertension and diabetes. Most risk factors, including dyslipidaemia, obesity, hypertension, and diabetes, were observed predominantly in Group-II, comprising middle-aged patients, and showed a significant difference compared to young-aged patients (p<0.001) (Table/Fig 2). The majority of patients, 67 (76.9%), presented with STEMI, and chest discomfort was the most reported complaint in 83 patients (95%). Among the STEMI patients, 45 (51.7%) presented with Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction (AWMI), and 30% of patients were thrombolysed (Table/Fig 3).

The angiographic findings revealed that most patients (67.8%) had obstructive CAD (>70% stenosis), with the LAD artery being the most common culprit vessel, and 32.2% had non-obstructive CAD (Table/Fig 4). The mean syntax score of present study population was 9.6±6.7. The majority of patients, especially in Group-II, had a low syntax score of 6.8±3.7. A syntax score above 22 was observed in only six patients (Table/Fig 5). The correlation of the mean syntax score with risk factors showed an association with obesity (10.6), physical inactivity (10.6), followed by diabetes (10.5) (Table/Fig 6).

Discussion

The ACS is a life-threatening condition characterised by coronary artery narrowing and thrombus formation. It is reported that the majority of young MI patients have at least one of the cardiovascular risk factors (16). Young patients have different characteristic features and risks for CAD compared to older patients. Over the past three decades, the prevalence of CV risk factors, including smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidaemia, has markedly increased in India (17). There are few age-related studies reporting the risk factors and angiographic profile in CAD patients (13),(18),(19), but there are very few Indian studies evaluating risk factors in association with the angiographic syntax score (16),(20). Therefore, in present study, authors aimed to assess the relationship between risk factors and the severity of the angiographic syntax score. Since there is no universal age cutoff to define young age (<45 years) (21),(22), we have divided the ACS patients into two groups (18-30 years (Group-I) as young and 31-45 years (Group-II) as middle-aged).

In present prospective study, the majority of patients comprised middle-aged patients (31-45 years, Group-II). A study by Morillas P et al., reported that 25% of AMI cases in India occur under the age of 40 and 50% under the age of 50 years (23). Older age alone was a strong independent risk factor for the incidence of CAD, as evident in present findings. Most patients were observed under Group-II, indicating that increased age is a risk factor for developing co-morbidities and the severity of CAD. It is clear that Group-II patients were more likely to experience CV morbidity than the younger population.

An individual’s lifestyle has a significant influence on the predisposition to CAD. Dyslipidaemia was found to be present in 82 (94%) of patients, with low HDL-cholesterol, high LDL, and triglyceride levels. A study by Akanda MAK et al., reported the prevalence of dyslipidaemia in about 60% of patients, indicating the risk of atherosclerotic lesions (24). Additionally, Sinha SK et al., reported that the frequency of dyslipidaemia data from different studies ranged from 20-80% (13). Similarly, a recent study revealed that atherosclerotic disease severity was largely influenced by dyslipidaemia (80%) in young adults (25). Recent research has explained the importance of inherent biological differences in lipid and glucose metabolism, inflammatory states, genetic predispositions, and epigenetic influences on the increased risk (26). These findings are consistent with this study, which reported 88.5% of dyslipidaemia patients. Based on this, it is recommended to follow a nutritional and balanced diet based on BMI to increase HDL-C levels.

Most of the patients in Group-II (62%) were found to be obese with a BMI of >30. Lakka HM et al., (in their study) have acknowledged that central obesity is an independent risk factor in middle-aged ACS male patients in connection with smoking and increases the risk of coronary events by 5.5 times (27). There appears to be a significant association between dyslipidaemia and obesity, as most obese patients were found to be dyslipidemic. The findings of the present study are consistent with previous studies that show clustering of key cardiovascular risk factors predominating the risk in young patients with CAD (28),(29). A recent study by Kumar V et al., revealed that the prevalence of obesity was only 33.3% in young STEMI patients, which was consistent with the AMIYA study (16). The higher rate of obesity in present study can be attributed to the inclusion of ACS (STEMI, NSTEMI, and USA) patients. It can be inferred that a sedentary lifestyle and physical inactivity have a significant influence on the development of CAD. A recent review suggests that primordial preventive measures at an early age should be followed by adopting healthy lifestyle changes such as a good diet, yoga, and meditation. Therefore, it is necessary to engage in regular physical activity to ensure heart health (30).

Cigarette smoking is a well-recognised behavioural risk factor for CAD morbidity and mortality. Among present study population, smoking habits were present in 50% of Group-II patients. However, the prevalence of smoking in these patients was lower compared to the study by Lakka HM et al., which comprised 78.5% of the population (27). Hypertension and diabetes accounted for 34.5%, which was consistent with the South Asian cohort of the INTERHEART study (31.1%), as the population subgroup was different (31).

The CAG data showed that most patients had obstructive CAD (vessel lumen stenosis ≥70%) in 67.8% of cases. SVD had a higher frequency followed by double and triple vessel disease. These findings are consistent with the studies by Saghir T et al., and Hong MK et al., (32),(33). Among patients with single-vessel disease, the artery LAD was the most common infarct-related artery (47.1%), while the LCX was involved in 11.5% and the RCA in 10.3%. Similarly, Badran HM et al., and Al-Mayali AH et al., also found a similar distribution of lesion arteries in the angiographic profile (7),(34). The low prevalence of double vessel disease suggests that extensive coronary involvement is not a common finding in young adults presenting with ACS. Available literature also indicates that young adults with ACS are characterised by less extensive coronary disease, mainly in the single-vessel form (7),(35).

The angiographic Syntax score is a valuable tool for scoring lesions that has been used to assess the severity and complexity of CAD in order to determine the appropriate revascularisation strategy [15,36]. It is used not only for identifying luminal stenosis but also for assessing plaque vulnerability, which is an important aspect of coronary artery anatomy in patients with acute STEMI (37). In present study, the mean Syntax score of the study population was 9.6±6.7. The majority of patients (n=70) had a low Syntax score (<16), and only 7% of patients had a high Syntax score (>22). Although there was no significant relation between coronary lesion grade and risk factors, upon correlating with the mean Syntax score, physical activity, obesity, and diabetes were found to be associated with coronary lesion grade. The difference in the grading of angiographic lesions can be attributed to poor functional capacity in these patients, as reported in the study by Tang WHM et al., (38). Recent studies have reported that the Syntax score can serve as an independent predictor of both morbidity and mortality in MI patients (37),(39),(40). Therefore, the Syntax score in these patients can be used to predict future risk and long-term prognosis.

Cameron SJ et al., have reported a case study where the risk and severity of CAD are lower in patients with a healthy lifestyle (41). Also, recent studies emphasise the importance of focusing on lifestyle factors in addition to conventional risk factors for CAD, as they play a crucial role in the pathways of CVD. Kalra A et al., have reported that adopting a multifaceted and universal approach to CVD prevention involves controlling risk factors in different population groups (26). Therefore, it is recommended to focus on lifestyle modifications, including a healthy diet and regular physical activity, for effective prevention of early CAD risk in young to middle-aged patients (38),(42).

Limitation(s)

There was no control group, so the statistical significance of each risk factor could not be analysed. Being an observational study, certain confounding variables may have played a role. Factors such as a family history of coronary heart disease may have introduced bias. Novel risk factors were not evaluated. This was a single-centre study, and authors only analysed patients who reached the hospital, so it may not be a true representative of the population. Therefore, the results cannot be generalised to the community. Like in many other studies, authors used eye-balling to grade angiographic stenosis.

Conclusion

The present study showed that CAD in young individuals occurred predominantly in males with hypertriglyceridemia, obesity, and a history of smoking as commonly occurring risk factors. The rapid changes in lifestyle, unhealthy habits such as smoking, sedentary lifestyle, and dietary factors are considered to be responsible for the increase in CAD in young adults. The incidence of critical CAD at a young age leads to the loss of workdays, transition from an active to a sedentary working life, and decreased efficiency. Therefore, greater emphasis should be placed on lifestyle modifications such as smoking cessation and regular physical activity for the primary prevention of MI in the young population, which is the best way to decrease mortality and morbidity related to ACS.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge the contrubution of the Departments of Cardiology and Biochemistry at Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati.

References

1.
Jepma P, Jorstad HT, Snaterse M, Ter Riet G, Kragten H, Lachman S, et al. Lifestyle modification in older versus younger patients with coronary artery disease. Heart. 2020;106(14):1066-72. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Gupta MD, Gupta P, Girish Mp, Roy A, Qamar A. Risk factors for myocardial infarction in very young South Asians. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2020;27(2):87-94. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Mack M, Gopal A. Epidemiology, traditional and novel risk factors in coronary artery disease. Cardiol Clin. 2014;32(3):323-32. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Garshick MS, Vaidean GD, Vani A, Underberg JA, Newman JD, Berger JS, et al. Cardiovascular risk factor control and lifestyle factors in young to middle-aged adults with newly diagnosed obstructive coronary artery disease. Cardiology. 2019;142(2):83-90. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Sagris M, Antonopoulos AS, Theofilis P, Oikonomou E, Siasos G, Tsalamandris S, et al. Risk factors profile of young and older patients with myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res. 2022;118(10):2281-92. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Deora S, Kumar T, Ramalingam R, Manjunath CN. Demographic and angiographic profile in premature cases of acute coronary syndrome: Analysis of 820 young patients from South India. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2016;6(3):193-98. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Badran HM, Elnoamany MF, Khalil TS, Eldin MME. Age-related alteration of risk profile, inflammatory response, and angiographic findings in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Clin Med Cardiol. 2009;3:15-28. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Gupta A, Wang Y, Spertus JA, Geda M, Lorenze N, Nkonde-Price C, et al. Trends in acute myocardial infarction in young patients and differences by sex and race, 2001 to 2010. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(4):337-45. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Rosengren A, Wallentin L, Simoons M, Gitt AK, Behar S, Battler A, et al. Age, clinical presentation, and outcome of acute coronary syndromes in the Euroheart acute coronary syndrome survey. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(7):789 95. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Popma JJ. Coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound imaging||. Chapter 18. In Douglas P Zipes, Peter Libby, Robert O, Bonow, Eugene Braunwald (eds), Braunwald’s Heart Disease A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, 7th edition, 2005;423-55.
11.
Hobbs FDR, Jukema JW, Da Silva PM, McCormack T, Catapano AL. Barriers to cardiovascular disease risk scoring and primary prevention in Europe. QJM. 2010;103(10):727-39. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Lloyd-Jones DM. Cardiovascular risk prediction: Basic concepts, current status, and future directions. Circulation. 2010;121(15):1768-77. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Sinha SK, Krishna V, Thakur R, Kumar A, Mishra V, Jha MJ, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in very young adults: A clinical presentation, risk factors, hospital outcome index, and their angiographic characteristics in North India-AMIYA study. ARYA Atheroscler. 2017;13(2):79-87.
14.
Lloyd-Jones DM, Braun LT, Ndumele CE, Smith SC Jr, Sperling LS, Virani SS, et al. Use of risk assessment tools to guide decision-making in the primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A special report from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology. Circulation. 2019;139(25):e1162-77. [crossref]
15.
Serruys PW, Onuma Y, Garg S, Sarno G, van den Brand M, Kappetein AP, et al. Assessment of the SYNTAX score in the Syntax study. EuroIntervention. 2009;5(1):50-56. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Kumar V, Kumar T, Sharma AK, Nath RK, Sharma LK, Pandit N, et al. Risk factors, clinical presentation, angiographic profile and 30-day outcomes of young patients (aged ≤35 years) with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Adv Hum Biol. 2021;11(2):188-94. [crossref]
17.
Gupta R. Meta-analysis of prevalence of hypertension in India. Indian Heart J. 1997;49(1):43-48.
18.
Iragavarapu T, Radhakrishna T, Babu KJ, Sanghamitra R. Acute coronary syndrome in young - A tertiary care centre experience with reference to coronary angiogram. J Pract Cardiovasc Sci. 2019;5:18-25. [crossref]
19.
Joshi P, Dahiya A, Thakur M, Sinha RP, Wardhan H. Clinical presentation, risk factors, and coronary angiographic profile of very young adults (≤30 years) presenting with first acute myocardial infarction at a tertiary care center in Rajasthan, India. Heart India. 2022;10:21-25.[crossref]
20.
Sricharan KN, Rajesh S, Rashmi, Meghana HC, Badiger S, Mathew S. Study of acute myocardial infarction in young adults: Risk factors, presentation and angiographic findings. J Clin Diagn Res. 2012;6(2):257-60.
21.
Wiesbauer F, Blessberger H, Azar D, Goliasch G, Wagner O, Gerhold L, et al. Familial-combined hyperlipidaemia in very young myocardial infarction survivors (≤40 years of age). Eur Heart J. 2009;30(9):1073 79. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Aggarwal A, Aggarwal S, Goel A, Sharma V, Dwivedi S. A retrospective case-control study of modifiable risk factors and cutaneous markers in Indian patients with young coronary artery disease. J R Soc Med Cardiovasc Dis. 2012;1:01-08. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Morillas P, Bertomeu V, Pabón P, Ancillo P, Bermejo J, Fernández C, et al. Characteristics and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in young patients. The PRIAMHO II study. Cardiology. 2007;107(4):217-25. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Akanda MAK, Ali SY, Islam AEMM, Rahman MM, Parveen A, Kabir MK, et al. Demographic profile, clinical presentation & angiographic findings in 637 patients with coronary heart disease. Faridpur Med Coll J. 2011;6(2):82-85. [crossref]
25.
Pillay AK, Naidoo DP. Atherosclerotic disease is the predominant aetiology of acute coronary syndrome in young adults. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2018;29(1):36-42. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Kalra A, Jose AP, Prabhakaran P, Kumar A, Agrawal A, Roy A, et al. The burgeoning cardiovascular disease epidemic in Indians-perspectives on contextual factors and potential solutions. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023;12:01-15. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Lakka HM, Lakka TA, Tuomilehto J, Salonen JT. Abdominal obesity is associated with increased risk of acute coronary events in men. Eur Heart J. 2002;23(9):706-13. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Kasliwal RR, Kulshreshtha A, Agrawal S, Bansal M, Trehan N. Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in Indian patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. J Assoc Physicians India. 2006;54:371-75. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Ranjith N, Pegoraro RJ, Rom L, Rajput MC, Naidoo D. Lp(a) and apoE polymorphisms in young South African Indians with myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc J S Afr. 2004;15(3):111-17.
30.
Vanajakshamma V, Latheef K, Vaishnavi K. Prevention of cardiovascular disease: It must start in childhood. Indian Journal of Cardiology. 2022;25(1-2):25-31. Available from: http://www.journal.iscindia.co.in/IssueDetail.aspx?issue=52.
31.
Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F, et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): Case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364(9438):937-52. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Saghir T, Qamar N, Sial J. Coronary angiographic characteristics of coronary artery disease in young adults under age forty years compare to those over age forty. Pakistan Heart Journal. 2012;41(3-4):49-56.
33.
Hong MK, Cho SY, Hong BK, Chang KJ, Mo-Chung I, Hyoung-Lee M, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in the young adults. Yonsei Med J. 1994;35(2):184-89. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Al-Mayali AH. Coronary artery disease in young versus older adults in Hilla city: Prevalence, clinical characteristics and angiographic profile. Karbala J Med. 2012;5(11):1328-33.
35.
Prajapati J, Joshi H, Sahoo S, Virpariya K, Parmar M, Shah K. AGE-related differences of novel atherosclerotic risk factors and angiographic profile among gujarati acute coronary syndrome patients. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(6):OC05-09. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Can MM, Tanboga H, Karabay CY, Güler A, Akgun T, Turkyilmaz E, et al. The treatment of acute myocardial infarction due to the occlusion of the left main coronary disease. Cardiol J. 2011;18(1):77-82.
37.
Akgun T, Oduncu V, Bitigen A, Karabay CY, Erkol A, Kocabay G, et al. Baseline SYNTAX score and long-term outcome in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2015;21(8):712-19. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Tang WHW, Topol EJ, Fan Y, Wu Y, Cho L, Stevenson C, et al. Prognostic value of estimated functional capacity incremental to cardiac biomarkers in stable cardiac patients. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(5):01-09. [crossref][PubMed]
39.
Safarian H, Alidoosti M, Shafiee A, Salarifar M, Poorhosseini H, Nematipour E. The SYNTAX score can predict major adverse cardiac events following percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart Views. 2014;15(4):99-105. [crossref][PubMed]
40.
Rong Y, Li T, Chen Y, Liu H, Hong W, Guan S, et al. The SYNTAX score and the coronary artery calcium score for the prediction of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Food Sci Technol. 2022;42(29621):01-11. [crossref]
41.
Cameron SJ, Block RC, Richeson JF. Severe coronary disease in an adult considered at low cardiovascular disease risk with a healthy lifestyle. J Clin Lipidol. 2013;7(5):526-30. [crossref][PubMed]
42.
Lévesque V, Poirier P, Després JP, Alméras N. Relation between a simple lifestyle risk score and established biological risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120(11):1939-46. [crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/67673.19415

Date of Submission: Sep 23, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Dec 14, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Mar 18, 2024
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 23, 2023
• Manual Googling: Feb 24, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Mar 14, 2024 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com