Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 72076

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2024 | Month : May | Volume : 18 | Issue : 5 | Page : ED01 - ED04 Full Version

Cytodiagnosis of Oncocytoma of Parotid Gland: A Report of Two Cases


Published: May 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/68375.19343
Shreya Ghosh, Arvind Bhake

1. Junior Resident, Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Director Professor, Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Shreya Ghosh,
Junior Resident, Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, DMIHER, Radhikabai PG Girl’s Hostel, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha-442001, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: dr.shreyaghosh94@gmail.com

Abstract

Among benign neoplasms of the salivary gland, malignancies are less common. One of the rarest tumours found in the oral cavity is oncocytoma, comprising less than 2% of all oral neoplasms and carrying a 1% risk of malignant transformation. Oncocytoma is rare among benign neoplasms, typically affecting females and impacting the major salivary glands. Literature discussing the cytodiagnosis of oncocytoma through Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) is even scarcer. Cytomorphological features indicating a predominantly oncocytic population with benign nuclear characteristics suggest the diagnosis of oncocytoma. The presence of oncocytes alongside other cell types in cytology smears suggests oncocytosis or a tumour-like presentation of Warthin’s tumour. Due to its unique features and clinical presentation, clinicians may misdiagnose this tumour as pleomorphic adenoma, haemangioma, or another form of oncocytosis due to its rarity and clinical features. Therefore, only histopathological examination can provide a definitive diagnosis. The present report discusses two unusual cytodiagnoses of oncocytoma identified through FNAC of the parotid gland in a 50-year-old female and a 70-year-old male, along with their clinicoradiological findings and subsequent tumour excision. Furthermore, the authors aim to raise awareness about the importance of a comprehensive work-up and optimal treatment selection for these lesions.

Keywords

Differential diagnosis of oncocytosis, Fine needle aspiration cytology, Oxyphilic adenoma

Case Report

Case 1

A 50-year-old female presented to the Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) outpatient department with a two-month history of earache. She also reported a nodular swelling in the preauricular region on the right-side (Table/Fig 1).

It was a round, fibrous, painless swelling that was initially small but slowly progressed in size with no cutaneous inflammatory reaction. There was no accompanying fever, mouth dryness, or soreness during chewing. The patient did not notice any variation in salivation. The patient had no history of radiation exposure or co-morbidities, no prior surgical experience, and was not taking any regular medication. The patient reported a medical history of right ear discharge 20 years ago, which was treated with oral antibiotics and anti-inflammatory drugs.

The ENT examination revealed a normal right-sided tympanic membrane, while the left ear examination was normal. The size of the preauricular nodular swelling was 5×4×2 cm, firm, and non tender. Transillumination examination of the swelling indicated a non cystic nature. The patient was referred for sonography of the swelling. Additionally, the patient complained of a headache, which was suspected to be clinically related to ear discharge and a temporal bone pathology. She was advised to undergo a Computed Tomography (CT) scan of the temporal bone. The CT findings of the right temporal bone were normal, except for minimal soft tissue density collection in the mastoid air cells. No abnormalities were observed in the bony and cartilaginous structures of the left external auditory canal, internal auditory canal, middle ear, and facial nerve bony canal on both sides. The radiologist suggested a diagnosis of mastoiditis (Table/Fig 2).

Further investigations included a Complete Blood Count (CBC), which yielded results within normal limits. Ultrasonography (USG) of the bilateral parotid region was conducted. The USG of the right parotid gland revealed a well-defined oval lesion in the superficial lobe with a hypervascular solid component. The nodule measured 2.5×1.5 cm with postacoustic enhancement. Sonography of the left parotid region did not show any abnormalities (Table/Fig 3).

The patient was advised to undergo sonography-guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC). The FNAC was performed using standard procedure, and the aspirated material was smeared for processing with Papanicolaou and Giemsa stains.

The cytologic smears were moderately cellular and predominantly composed of oncocytic cells. These cells were arranged in monolayered cell sheets, papillaroid fragments, and smooth globular cell sheets. The oncocytes exhibited moderate to ample granular cytoplasm, centrally placed nuclei with frequent nucleoli and anisonucleosis. The nuclei appeared slightly hyperchromatic but lacked significant pleomorphism. The background contained scant granular material from cytoplasmic lysis, sparse lymphocytes, and minimal necrosis. These cytomorphological features supported the diagnosis of oncocytoma (Table/Fig 4).

Subsequently, the patient underwent complete excision of the nodule within the superficial lobe of the right parotid. Microscopic examination revealed sheets of benign oncocytic cells with pyknotic nuclei and moderate to abundant eosinophilic cytoplasmic densities. The histopathological analysis {Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)} of the excised nodule confirmed the diagnosis of a benign oncocytoma. After one year of follow-up, the patient remains disease-free without any local or distant recurrence (Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 6).

Case 2

A 70-year-old male presented to the surgery outpatient department with a swelling on the right-side of his face (Table/Fig 7). The swelling had been present for the past three years, gradually increasing in size, with no associated symptoms related to the ear, nose, throat, or oral cavity. The patient did not report any significant past medical history relevant to the swelling. The results of the clinical evaluation were normal. The swelling measured 3.5×3 cm and was soft to the touch, non-tender, and not adherent to underlying tissues.

The swelling had a firm consistency and was non cystic, as well as non-tender. The patient was referred for Ultrasound (USG). The sonography revealed a solitary lesion in the superficial lobe of the right parotid, which was well-circumscribed. There was a slight increase in vascularity but no significant cystic component. No lymph nodes were noted around the swelling. The patient was then referred for Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) under USG guidance (Table/Fig 8).

The aspirated material was creamy and abundant. It was smeared and fixed for Papanicolaou and Giemsa staining. The smears were moderately cellular and predominantly composed of oncocytic cells. The lobulated cells were arranged in small sheets and a few monolayered cell sheets. The cells were intermediate in size, polygonal to cuboidal, with moderate to ample cytoplasm. The nuclei were uniform, round to ovoid, with rare spindling and anisonucleosis, but without significant pleomorphism. The background in many areas contained a few macrophages, sparse lymphocytes, and mucomyxoid and haemorrhagic material in hyaline globules. Based on these cytomorphological features, a diagnosis of oncocytoma was made (Table/Fig 9).

Following standard haematological and biochemical investigations, the patient underwent surgical removal of the tumourous nodular swelling. The haematological reports (including complete blood count and coagulation profile) and biochemical reports (such as salivary amylase, carbonic anhydrase, lysozyme C) were within normal limits.

On gross examination, the cut section of the specimen revealed a predominantly solid, well-circumscribed tumour mass with areas of cystic necrosis. Microscopically, the specimen showed sheets of large polyhedral cells, or oncocytes, with sparse connective tissue stroma and abundant granular eosinophilic cytoplasm. No mitotic figures were observed. The histological features of the tumour mass were consistent with a benign oncocytoma (Table/Fig 10),(Table/Fig 11)a,b.

The patient is currently free of illness and shows no symptoms of relapse.

Discussion

Parotid neoplasms account for less than 3% of all head and neck tumours, with 1% of parotid tumours originating from oncocytic cells (1). The presence of oncocytes in salivary gland neoplastic pathology was previously classified by the World Health Organisation (WHO) into three categories: Oncocytosis, Oncocytoma, and Oncocytic Carcinoma. However, the WHO 2022 classification has made several changes, reclassifying oncocytic carcinoma as salivary carcinoma, Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) type, with emerging entities. On the other hand, the lesion of oncocytoma, as classified in the WHO 2017 version, has been retained in the 2022 classification as Oncocytoma (2).

Oncocytoma is an uncommon benign salivary gland tumour composed of large epithelial cells known as oncocytes, primarily derived from the salivary duct-lining oncocytic cells. The prefix “onco” is derived from the Greek word “on koustai,” meaning “to swell.” The term “oncocytoma” was coined by Jaffe. Meza-Chavez later proposed the term “Oxyphilic granular cell adenoma,” linking the increased mitochondrial content in tumour cells to the eosinophilic granular cytoplasm (3).

Oncocytes in salivary glands are rare in individuals under 50 years old but are typically present in individuals by age 70 years. They are often observed in the seventh to eighth decade of life, with a slight female predilection. Oncocytes can be found in various parts of the body, including the respiratory tract, mammary glands, thyroid gland, pancreas, parathyroid gland, pituitary gland, testes, fallopian tubes, liver, stomach, as well as the major salivary glands in the oral cavity. The first case of oncocytoma in a salivary gland was discovered by Hamperl in 1931 (3).

The oncocyte is an epithelial cell with a unique morphology characterised by abundant granular eosinophilic cytoplasm and a central or eccentric nucleus with coarse chromatin or pyknotic nuclei. The appearance of the nuclei can sometimes be atypical, raising suspicion of malignancy within the oncocytes (4).

Encountering a pure oncocytic cell pathology is rare, especially when a diagnosis confirmation is required through fine needle aspiration cytology. This rarity is also true for the occurrence of oncocytic neoplasms among head and neck tumours.

Cytodiagnosis of oncocytic neoplasms is challenging for two main reasons: 1) Oncocytic cells can be found in conditions other than oncocytic neoplasia, such as chronic parotitis (chronic sialadenitis) and others; and 2) Oncocytes can maintain morphological differentiation even in the presence of oncocytic carcinoma (4).

The difficulty in interpretation can be overcome by the presence of lymphoid cell infiltration and the presence of nuclear atypism in smears of fine needle aspirate in chronic sialadenitis. Well-differentiated oncocytic carcinomas exhibit low-grade malignant nuclear features that allow for the distinction based on cytomorphology in the smears.

There are isolated case reports in the literature describing the diagnosis of oncocytoma of the parotid gland. Cytodiagnosis achieved through fine needle aspiration cytology of oncocytoma is even rarer.

Verma K and Kapila K published a comprehensive report on cytologic findings and the differential diagnosis of salivary gland tumours with prominent oncocytic components. The results of their study suggested that the FNAC work-up for salivary gland tumours containing oncocytic components is fairly accurate for a preoperative diagnosis (1).

Chakrabarti I et al., studied that clinically and cytologically, an oncocytic neoplasm was suspected, but further histological study revealed diffuse hyperplastic oncocytosis. Therefore, histological investigation often remains the cornerstone of diagnosis in cases of oncocytic lesions of the salivary glands, presenting significant challenges to cytopathologists (5).

Palakshappa SG et al., studied that, to the best of their knowledge, this oncocytoma originating from a small salivary gland was the first example documented and the 18th overall occurring in the right retromolar area. Due to the lack of extensive series, a thorough analysis of the cases reported in the literature could lead to a better understanding of this uncommon phenomenon (6).

Sharma V et al., studied that oncocytes can be found in salivary glands in various circumstances, from hyperplasia to obviously malignant tumours. Due to localised sampling of the lesion, diagnosis by FNAC can be exceedingly challenging because oncocytic alterations can occur in a wide range of neoplastic and non neoplastic diseases. Histopathology remains the most reliable method for determining an accurate diagnosis (4).

Previous studies showed that rare and benign oncocytomas of the parotid gland have not received much attention. The current gold standard of care is surgical excision. Although they are uncommon, appropriate imaging such as CT and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), followed by FNAC, would aid in determining the right surgical technique. Since there is evidence of recurrence, all patients undergoing MRI are encouraged to follow-up (7).

Oncocytomas of the parotid gland are uncommon (8) and are a distinct benign neoplasm described in the WHO classification (2). Oncocytes are epithelial cells rich in mitochondria (9). Oncocytes are known to be present in various lesions, such as chronic inflammatory lesions of the salivary gland, as an active process. However, a smaller population of oncocytes, whether in histological sections or cytologic preparations, indicates primary oncocytic cell neoplasia (3),(9),(10).

Oncocytomas are known to have frequent cytogenetic abnormalities, such as Copy Number Alterations (CNAs) of 7q, 10q, and 16p on comparative genomic hybridisation, but these abnormalities are inconsistent (11).

Cytodiagnosis performed on FNAC of oncocytomas of the parotid gland is infrequently published in the literature. This rarity of incidence and overlapping cytomorphologies contribute to this. The classic cytologic features described for oncocytoma include the absolute population of oncocytes without significant accompanying cells, such as lymphocytes, cysts, macrophages, and pure ductal cells, which should raise suspicion of oncocytoma. The cases described in the literature showed similar cytomorphology in the diagnosis of oncocytoma.

Cytopathologists commonly face a dilemma in the FNAC diagnosis of oncocytoma. The reasons for this include: i) its occurrence as a metaplastic change in chronic sialadenitis; ii) Warthin’s tumour; iii) distinguishing between benign and malignant oncocytomas.

It is described in the literature that oncocytes associated with inflammatory cells, cysts, macrophages, or a polymorphous population of lymphoid cells are less likely to be oncocytoma itself (5),(6). Another challenge for cytologists is differentiating between benign oncocytoma and malignant oncocytoma. Higher degrees of nuclear pleomorphism within the cells and a comparative decrease in cell size favour the diagnosis of malignant oncocytoma. The cases presented lacked nuclear pleomorphism, and the cell size was intermediate to large. Additionally, there were no inflammatory cells or other cells in the cytology smears from fine needle aspiration in these cases.

The two cases presented in these articles underwent excision of nodular tumours, confirming the diagnosis of oncocytoma. Some studies consider the differential diagnosis for oncocytoma to include conditions showing oncocytosis, such as diffuse hyperplastic oncocytosis or multifocal nodular oncocytic hyperplasia. However, both of these conditions do not alter the treatment approach for the lesion.

An interesting report by Patel ND et al., in the literature described oncocytoma as a vanishing parotid mass. It is known that oncocytes undergo necrosis in many instances after FNAC due to ischaemic necrosis (9).

Conclusion

The experience with these two cases of cytodiagnosis of oncocytoma by FNAC leads to the conclusion that a pure population of oncocytes with benign nuclei correlates well with benign oncocytoma neoplasia. The preoperative diagnosis of oncocytoma allows the surgeon to plan the surgical excision. Despite their remarkable survival rate and low recurrence rate, oncocytomas require a proper diagnosis.

The two cases described are unique due to the rarity of oncocytoma being diagnosed through fine needle aspiration cytology, in addition to histological diagnosis, alongside routine clinical and radiological diagnosis. This aids in more accurately detecting a head and neck lesion with specific microscopic characteristics. This will contribute to the existing literature on cytodiagnosis of oncocytoma. Since there are not many extensive series available, a thorough examination of the examples documented in the literature should help authors better understand this uncommon phenomenon.

References

1.
Verma K, Kapila K. Salivary gland tumours with a prominent oncocytic component: Cytologic findings and differential diagnosis of oncocytomas and Warthin’s tumour on fine needle aspirates. Acta cytologica. 2003;47(2):221-26. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Z ? urek M, Fus L, Niemczyk K, Rzepakowska A. Salivary gland pathologies: Evolution in classification and association with unique genetic alterations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023;280(11):4739-50. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Singh J, Chandra A, Srilatha T, Jain T, Raja D, Agrawal R. Oncocytoma of the parotid gland: A rare benign tumour. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2023;27(Suppl 1):S41. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Sharma V, Kumar S, Sethi A. Oncocytoma parotid gland. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2018;8(2):330. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Chakrabarti I, Basu A, Ghosh N. Oncocytic lesion of parotid gland: A dilemma for cytopathologists. J Cytol. 2012;29(1):80-82. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Palakshappa SG, Bansal V, Reddy V, Kamarthi N. Oncocytoma of minor salivary gland involving the retromolar region: A rare entity. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2014;18(1):127-30. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Vlachaki E, Tsapas A, Dimitrakopoulos K, Kontzoglou G, Klonizakis I. Parotid gland oncocytoma: A case report. Cases J. 2009;2:6423. Doi: 10.1186/1757- 1626-0002-0000006423. PMID: 20181155; PMCID: PMC2827107. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Capone RB, Ha PK, Westra WH, Pilkington TM, Sciubba JJ, Koch WM, et al. Oncocytic neoplasms of the parotid gland: A 16-year institutional review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;126(6):657-62. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Patel ND, Van Zante A, Eisele DW, Harnsberger HR, Glastonbury CM. Oncocytoma: The vanishing parotid mass. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(9):1703-06. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Sreedevi NM, Vernekar SS, Samee MM, Dandinarasaiah M. A large malignant oncocytoma of parotid gland: A case report. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;6(12):2307. [crossref]
11.
Zerjav M, DiAdamo A, Grommisch B, Katherine A, Chai H, Peng G, et al. Cytogenomic abnormalities in 19 cases of salivary gland tumours of parotid gland origin. Case reports in genetics. 2020;2020:8897541.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/68375.19343

Date of Submission: Nov 10, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jan 10, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Feb 27, 2024
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 08, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jan 08, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Feb 22, 2024 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com