Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 120293

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : April | Volume : 18 | Issue : 4 | Page : NC12 - NC15 Full Version

Causation, Types and Outcome of Road Traffic-related Ocular Injury in University of Llorin, Kwara, Nigeria


Published: April 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/36121.19324
Olawale Job Oladejo, Dupe Serifat Ademola-Popoola, Amase Nyamngee, Folu Owoeye

1. Consultant Ophthalmologist, Department of Ophthalmology, Lautech Teaching Hospital, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria. 2. Senior Lecturer, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Kwara, Nigeria. 3. Lecturer, Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Kwara, Nigeria. 4. Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Kwara, Nigeria.

Correspondence Address :
Olawale Job Oladejo,
Consultant Ophthalmologist, Department of Ophthalmology, Lautech Teaching Hospital, PMB-4004, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria.
E-mail: olawale333@yahoo.com

Abstract

Introduction: Despite transportation liberating man and making him mobile, his increasing reliance on vehicular movement has conferred great facilities on him and his activities. The most profound culprit of all modes of transport is the road, of which traffic accidents are the most disturbing consequence of its use. Road traffic-related ocular injuries often have severe consequences and form a significant part of ophthalmic emergencies. These injuries may be missed and are therefore often underreported.

Aim: To determine the causation, types, and outcomes of road traffic-related ocular injuries at the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Kwara, Nigeria.

Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted on 78 eyes of consecutive patients with road traffic-related ocular injuries who presented at the Accident and Emergency unit of the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Kwara, Algeria, between September 2012 and August 2013. The materials included the HOTV chart for vision assessment, which is a standardised, easy-to-use assessment method for both literate and illiterate individuals, a pen torch, direct ophthalmoscope, binocular indirect ophthalmoscope, slit lamp biomicroscope, Perkins tonometer, 2% fluorescein strip, 0.5% GuttTetracaine, and a handheld portable slit lamp ophthalmoscope. Patients’ demographics, duration of ocular injury before presentation, Visual Acuity (VA) at presentation, type of vehicle, place of injury, classification of ocular injury, treatment, and outcome on follow-up were recorded.

Results: There were 78 eyes (72 patients) with road traffic-related ocular injuries. The age range of the subjects was 3-55 years with a mean of 31.10 years. Forty-four (61.1%) patients were young men between 20-39 years. Fifty-one (70.8%) patients were males, and 21 (29.2%) were females, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.4:1. Most of the victims were traders (22, 30.6%), and fifty-two eyes (72.2%) presented within 12 hours of ocular injury. Motorcycles were associated with ocular injury in 37 (51.4%) patients. The most common injuries were of closed globe type (contusion, lamellar laceration, superficial foreign body) in 70 patients (89.7%).

Conclusion: Road traffic-related injuries have increased over the past eight years in Nigeria. Males are more commonly injured in Road Traffic Injury (RTI), and motorcycles were the most common cause of injury to road users. Three out of 36 people injured in a vehicle at the time of injury used seat belts, while none of the riders and passengers on motorcycles wore helmets. The importance of prevention, the use of safety devices, and the avoidance of risk behaviors on the road need to be emphasised.

Keywords

Eye injury, HOTV chart, Motorcycle, Visual outcome

Transportation of goods and services by air, road, or sea plays an important role in the socio-economic development of any nation. In Nigeria, about 70% of the movement of people and goods is done by road (1). This is due to the absence of an effective transport system like the rail, the non-affordability of air transport, and the lack of an effective inland waterway (1). RTI are the leading cause of death among young people aged 15-29 years (2). More than 90% of the world’s fatalities on the roads occur in low and middle-income countries, even though these countries have approximately half of the world’s vehicles (2). Motorcycles constitute one of the most important means of transportation in many Nigerian cities (3),(4),(5). Nearly half of the people dying on the world’s roads are “vulnerable road users” such as pedestrians and motorcyclists.

Ocular injuries form a significant part of ophthalmic emergencies in tertiary hospitals in Nigeria (6). These injuries may be missed in the presence of life-threatening injuries and are therefore often underreported. The risk for ocular injury following a road traffic crash increases in the presence of facial fractures (7). A patient with a facial fracture is 6.7 times more likely to have an ocular injury compared to patients with no facial fracture (7). An apparent increase in road traffic-related ocular injuries has been noted. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the pattern of presentation and visual outcome of ocular injury among victims of RTIs.

Material and Methods

This was a cross-sectional study of patients with road traffic-related ocular injuries who presented to the surgical emergency room of the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital (UITH), Kwara, Nigeria, from September 2012 and August 2013. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee (ERC) of the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital (UITH/CAT/189/15/431). UITH is the only major functional hospital with the capacity to promptly treat injured patients from Kwara, the northern parts of Oyo and Osun, the southern part of Niger, and the western parts of Kogi and Ekiti States of Nigeria, with a catchment area of about 10 million people (8). All the patients who presented to the hospital with ocular injuries were included in the study.

Procedure

A total of 72 patients were included in the study with analysis of total 78 ocular injuries reported in the hospital.

Demographic data was collected through a proforma, which included the subjects’ age, gender, occupation, injury status (whether driver, rider, passenger, or pedestrian), and type of collision (vehicle-vehicle, motorcycle-vehicle, motorcycle-motorcycle, motorcycle-pedestrian, lone motorcyclist, and other collisions). The injury arrival interval was categorised as 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours, >6-24 hours, >24-48 hours, and >48 hours. Mechanism of injury, use of helmet, and use of seat belt were also recorded.

All accident victims suspected to have ocular injuries were observed at the Accident and Emergency unit. Prompt evaluation, including ocular examination, was carried out using the HOTV chart (Table/Fig 1), a pen torch, direct ophthalmoscope, binocular indirect ophthalmoscope, Perkins tonometer, % fluorescein strip, 0.5% tetracaine, and handheld portable slit lamp, especially in non-ambulating patients.

A HOTV chart is a set of four optotypes that are recognisable and maximally distinguishable. It provides a good measurement of VA for four and five-year-old children, as well as adults, at a distance of 20 feet from the patient. Preoperative consent was obtained from all the patients by the researcher. The consent process included discussing the risks of multiple surgeries if required and the risk of globe evisceration in case the eye was unsalvageable.

All patients with open globe injuries were operated on under general anaesthesia using an operating microscope. Preoperatively, the authors examined the eye, and during surgical exploration, the extent of ocular injuries was determined. Patients with penetrating ocular injuries received intravenous ciprofloxacin and metronidazole as prophylaxis. If a limbal laceration was present, it was identified and sutured first with a 10.0 Nylon suture. This was followed by repairing the cornea laceration with interrupted 10.0 Nylon sutures. Subsequently, the scleral laceration was explored and sutured with interrupted 6.0 Vicryl sutures.

B-scan ultrasonography was performed, especially for patients with posterior segment injuries and media opacity. Cases of severe ocular injuries were admitted to the ward for surgical intervention, as indicated. Unsalvageable globes were eviscerated, and ocular prosthesis implantation was performed. Patients with multiple injuries, such as maxillofacial, orthopedic, neurosurgical, and musculoskeletal injuries, were co-managed with the relevant specialist team. Superficial corneal foreign bodies were removed under local anaesthesia (0.5% Tetracaine) using a sterile needle tip. Conjunctival foreign bodies were removed with Moorfields forceps, while small particles were flushed out of the eye with normal saline. Subconjunctival hemorrhage following contusion injuries were managed on an outpatient basis. The final VA was assessed at the end of the four-month follow-up period, allowing for the resolution of intraocular inflammation and accurate assessment of the best-corrected VA in patients who underwent postoperative cataract surgery.

The standardised International classification (9),(10) of ocular trauma, approved by the World Health Organisation, was used. It considers the type, severity, and extent of the injury, as well as the VA at presentation, as a predictive factors for visual outcome with a high degree of accuracy. Closed globe injuries include those involving blunt force resulting in contusion, superficial foreign body, or lamellar laceration. Open globe injuries include ruptured globe, penetrating, perforating, and intraocular foreign body.

Statistical Analysis

The data were analysed using SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, US). Statistical analysis of quantitative data, including descriptive statistics, was performed. The results were analysed using frequency distribution for categorical variables and measures of central tendency for quantitative variables. A statistical significance level of p-value <0.05 was set. Fisher’s exact test was applied. The presentation of the results was done using frequency tables, charts, and figures.

Results

A total of 885 (60.3%) patients had RTI. Among these, 72 (8.1%) patients had traffic-related ocular injuries affecting 78 eyes.

The mean age of patients with traffic-related ocular injuries was 31.1±13 years. The majority of patients (44, 61.1%) were in the age range of 20-39 years. Out of the total, 51 (70.8%) were males and 21 (29.2%) were females, resulting in a male-to-female ratio of 2.4:1 (Table/Fig 2).

Traders, technicians/artisans, and individuals with no formal education were found to be more vulnerable to traffic-related ocular injuries, accounting for 22 (30.6%), 21 (29.2%), and 32 (44.4%) cases, respectively (Table/Fig 3).

Fifty-two (72.2%) patients presented within 12 hours of injury, with a mean injury arrival time of 1.36±0.21 hours.

The position of the patients at the time of ocular injury revealed that motorcycle riders (27, 37.5%) were predominantly involved. Others included non-front seat passengers (20, 27.7%), bus/car drivers (5, 6.9%), and pedestrians (9, 12.0%) who were hit by a motorcycle or car. Among the ocular injuries, 37 (51.4%) were associated with motorcycles. The causes of accidents leading to ocular injuries are stated in (Table/Fig 4).

Out of the 36 people who were injured inside a vehicle, three (8.3%) were using seat belts at the time of the injury, while none of the motorcycle riders or passengers were wearing helmets. In terms of eye involvement, the left and right eyes were affected in 35 (48.6%) and 31 (43.1%) cases, respectively. Both eyes were involved in 6 (8.3%) patients. All the patients with bilateral ocular injuries were males, including four motorcycle riders, a passenger, and a pedestrian.

According to the Standardised International Classification of Ocular Injuries, closed globe injuries occurred in 70 (89.7%) eyes, while open globe injuries occurred in 8 (10.3%) eyes. Closed globe injuries included contusion, lamellar laceration, and superficial foreign bodies. Among the eyes, 54 (77.1%) had contusion injuries, 2 (2.9%) had lamellar lacerations, 6 (8.6%) had superficial foreign bodies, and 1 (2.9%) had a mixed type injury. At presentation, 48 eyes had a Visual Acuity (VA) of 20/40 or better, while at the end of the 4-month follow-up, 55 eyes had a VA of 20/40 or better (p≤0.001). Eyes with open globe injuries showed no improvement in visual acuity and had VA ranging from 19/200 to 5/200 (<6/60) at the end of the 4-month follow-up. Five eyes had No Perception of Light (NPL) (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

Road traffic-related ocular injuries accounted for 8.1% of all traffic injuries treated in the hospital. This percentage is higher (2.8%) than that reported in a previous study (11). The increase in ocular injuries may be attributed to the higher number of motorcycles and vehicles on the roads over the last decade, without a corresponding improvement in the enforcement of traffic regulations.

The male-to-female ratio of 2.4:1 in the present study is consistent with ratios reported in other studies, ranging from 2.4:1 to 5:1 [4,6,12]. This ratio is largely due to the fact that driving and riding are predominantly male activities in Nigeria. The higher number of individuals affected in the 30-39 years age range in this study, compared to the 21-30 years age range reported in another study (13), may be attributed to the economic challenges in our country. These challenges have made commercial motorcycling a common job among people in the first four decades of life. Additionally, this age group is more prone to engaging in risk-taking behaviors, such as reckless overtaking, maneuvering, and speeding.

It is notable that the majority of the injured patients were traders (30.6%), followed by technicians/artisans (29.1%) and others (27.8%). This is likely because trading and semi-skilled work are predominant in this society. Traders often travel long distances by road to hinterland markets to earn their livelihood, making them more susceptible to traffic injuries. Technicians and artisans move from place to place in pursuit of materials for their jobs, while university and polytechnic students are at a higher risk of road traffic injuries during their journeys to and from school on motorcycles.

In the present study, approximately 84.7% of patients with ocular injuries presented within 24 hours of the injury. This is similar to the reports of other Nigerian studies, which reported percentages between 80% and 85% (3),(6),(11). This may be due to the acute nature of the injury, the presence of other road users who assist with transportation to the hospital, and police cases requiring incident reports. However, this is different from the 28.9% reported by another study conducted in Irrua, Benin-City (13).

Motorcycles were involved in approximately 50% of the cases, followed by cars and other vehicles. There were also more motorcyclists and non-front seat passengers involved. This is similar to what other Nigerian authors have reported regarding road traffic injuries, with motorcycles being the most common, followed by private cars (4),(14). Motorcycles are ubiquitous, have increased acceptability, are easy to acquire, and have less attention paid to compliance with regulations and eye safety measures by riders, making them more vulnerable. Non-front seat passengers are least likely to be immediately aware of danger, while a front seat passenger may quickly hold onto a fixed object in the vehicle. Unfortunate pedestrians are often oblivious to danger, as walkways may not be available, not used, or zebra crossings may not be available.

It is notable that only 3 (4.2%) out of 36 people injured in a vehicle at the time of the injury were using seat belts, while none of the motorcycle riders or passengers were wearing helmets. This may be due to ignorance and poor enforcement of existing traffic regulations. Compulsory seat belt legislation and enforcement in Germany and Great Britain led to a 60% to 75% reduction in ocular injuries (15),(16),(17). In this study, the left eye was more involved. This may be attributable to the majority of people being right-handed, which may provide more stability on the right side and expose the left side to a higher risk of injury, especially when riding a motorcycle (18). Both eyes were involved in six patients. A previous study had shown that bilateral ocular injuries are more common in road traffic injuries than in injuries caused by other factors (19).

In the present study, 70 eyes had closed globe injuries at presentation, out of which 48 (68.6%) had an initial Visual Acuity (VA) of 20/40 or better. At the end of the 4-month follow-up, 55 eyes (78.6%) had a final VA of 20/40 (6/12) or better, suggesting a good visual outcome in closed globe injuries. The eight eyes with open globe injuries had a poor final VA of 19/200-5/200 (<6/60). This is in agreement with other studies that inferenced that patients with severe intraocular damage and open globe injuries have worse visual outcomes (20),(21),(22),(23). Therefore, the use of protective goggles by drivers or riders of motorcycles should be encouraged. Additionally, road signs, educational programs, proper training of drivers/riders, passenger rights, educative signboards, caution signs on roads, and speed limit enforcement are advised.

Limitation(s)

The study conducted was a hospital-based and may not necessarily represent the prevalence of road traffic-related ocular injuries in the general population of Nigeria. Therefore, it is advised that future epidemiological studies be conducted to investigate the occurrence of road traffic-associated ocular injuries more comprehensively.

Conclusion

The road traffic injuries primarily affected individuals in their third and fourth decades of life, particularly those whose occupations involved frequent travel. Ocular injuries were more commonly associated with motorcycle accidents. Despite early presentation, open globe injuries resulted in poor visual outcomes. Increasing public awareness of safety measures and enforcing the use of helmets and seatbelts are crucial in preventing ocular injuries.

Conflict of interest: The patients only paid for procedures considered part of the routine care for their condition. The remaining costs were covered by the researchers. Therefore, there was no financial burden on the subjects of the study.

References

1.
Akinwumi OF. Road traffic crashes. Problems of mass casualty management in Nigeria- an FRSC experience. Arcv Ibadan Med. 2006;7(2):76-78.
2.
WHO. Road Traffic Injuries. World Health Organization Publication. March 2013.
3.
Oyeyemi BO. Productivity and road traffic administration in Nigeria Impediments and strategies, Clemeve Media Consult, Ibadan, 2003.
4.
Akhigbe PO. Motorcycle related maxillofacial injuries in a semi-urban town in Nigeria: A 4-year review of cases in Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital, UMEA International School of Public Health Publication, 2010.
5.
Nzegwu MA, Akhiwu W, Nzegwu CO, Ibeziakor N. Analysis of patterns of morbidity and mortality amongst pedestrians involved in road traffic accident in Benin City Nigeria between August 2003-July 2004. AdvBiores. 2011;2:144-47. Available from: http://www.soeagra.com/abr.htm. ISSN 0976-4585.
6.
Adegbehingbe BO, Oluwadiya KS, Adegbehingbe OO. Motorcycle associated ocular injuries. Afr J Trauma. 2004;2:35-39.
7.
Guly GM, Guly HR, Bouamra O, Gray RH, Lecky FE. Ocular injuries in patients with major trauma. Emerg Med J. 2006;23(12):915-17. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Federal Republic of Nigeria official Gazette. 2007;94:No-65. 4:B52-191. Link: Gazette. Africa. Database. archive 2007. Public Procurement Act, 2007.
9.
Kuhn F, Maisiak R, Mann L, Mester V, Morris R, Douglas Witherspoon C. The Ocular Trauma Score (OTS). Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2002;15(2):163-65. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Kuhn F, Morris F, Witherspoon CD, Heimann K, Jeffers JB, Treister G. A standardized International classification of ocular trauma. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(2):240-43. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Ajibode HA, Thann LOA, Onabolu OO, Bodunde OT, Otulana TO. Eye injuries among road traffic accident Victims in Ogun State, Nigeria. Nig J Ophthalmol. 2009;17(2):55-58. [crossref]
12.
Jovanoic M, Hentoic-Sencanic P, Vukovic D, Glisic S, Knezevic M. Simultaneous injuries to both eyes in traffic accidents. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;249:1761-64. Doi: 10.1007/s00417-010-1473-z. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Enoch ME, Dawodu OA, Osahon AI, Dawodu O. Motorcycle related ocular injuries. J Biomed Sci. 2008;7(1-2):24-29. [crossref]
14.
Solagberu BA, Ofoegbu CKP, Nasir AA, Ogundipe OK, Adekanye AO, Abdur- Rahman LO. Motorcycle injuries in a developing country and the vulnerability of riders, passengers and pedestrians. Br Med J. 2006;12(4):266-68. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Schrader W, Garner E, Goldmann F, Marcus U. Penetrating and perforating eye injuries in 343 patients due to auto accidents before and after compulsory seat belt legislation in fines (1966-1998), Klin Monatsbi Augenhelikd. 2000;217(1):03-09. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Panagiotidis DN, Theodossiadis PG, Petsias CB, Kyriaki TE, Marakis TP, Friberg TR, et al. Ocular injuries secondary to motor vehicle accidents. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2004;14(2):144-48. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Arora AS, Bhargava G, Chauhan A, Singh P. Ocular trauma in road traffic accidents: Experience at Mathura Das Hospital, Jodhpur, Rajasthan J Ophthalmol. 2011;1:01-04.
18.
Bhattacharjee H, Bhattacharjee K, Jain L, Sarma G, Sarma AS, Medhi J, et. al. Indirect optic nerve injury in two-wheeler riders in Northeast India, Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008;56(6):475-80. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Ademola-Popoola DS. Pattern of ocular injury: UITH Experience. 16 th April,1999 to 15th April 2000, Dissertation Submitted to the NPMCN May 20001.
20.
Okoye O, Maguilike NO, Chuka-Okosa CM. Ocular Complications among cases of head injury sees in a neurosurgical hospital in Southeastern Nigeria. Nig J Ophthalmol. 2009;17(7):09-13. [crossref]
21.
Hooi SH, Hoo ST. Open globe injuries. The experience at Hospital SultanahAmmah, Johor Bahru. Med J Malaysia. 2003;58(3):405-12.
22.
Thevi T, Mimivati Z, Reddy SC. Visual outcome in open globe injuries. Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2012;4(2):263-70. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Lima-Gomez V, Leon-Ascencio CP, Blanco-Hernandez DMR. Can visual outcome be improved in open globe ocular trauma? Cir Cir. 2012;80(3):211-17.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/36121.19324

Date of Submission: Feb 28, 2018
Date of Peer Review: Apr 17, 2018
Date of Acceptance: Oct 15, 2023
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 01, 2018
• Manual Googling: May 17, 2018
• iThenticate Software: Oct 11, 2023 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com