Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 29618

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : April | Volume : 18 | Issue : 4 | Page : ZC31 - ZC35 Full Version

Assessment of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration and Anti-biofilm Activity of Plectranthus amboinicus Solvent Extract against Pure Strains of Putative Periodontal Pathogens: An In-vitro Study


Published: April 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/67836.19311
S Lavanya, T Jessica Christella, Nizar Ahmed, SK Balaji, Vamsi Lavu

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Periodontics, Sri Ramachandra Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Postgraduate Student, Department of Periodontics, Sri Ramachandra Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Periodontics, Sri Ramachandra Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Professor, Department of Periodontics, Sri Ramachandra Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Professor, Department of Periodontics, Sri Ramachandra Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Vamsi Lavu,
Professor, Department of Periodontology, Sri Ramachandra Dental College and Hospital, Porur, Chennai-600116, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: vamsilavu@sriramachandra.edu.in

Abstract

Introduction: Antiseptic agents used in periodontics as anti-plaque and anti-gingivitis agents are primarily chemical substances such as Bis-biguanide derivatives (chlorhexidine) or essential oils. Herbal derivatives have gained prominence in the recent past due to their activity against putative periodontal pathogens; however, only a few have achieved commercialisation. This study focusses on determining the efficacy of an extract from a widely available herb, Indian mint-Plectranthus Amboinicus Methanolic extract (PAM), which has known anti-microbial and anti-inflammatory properties against periodontal pathogens in-vitro.

Aim: To assess the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and anti-biofilm property of PAM solvent extract against pure strains of putative periodontal pathogens, namely Porphyromonas gingivalis (American Type Culture Collection-ATCC 33277), Fusobacterium nucleatum (ATCC 25586), and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (ATCC 43718).

Materials and Methods: The extract of PA was prepared using methanol and a Soxhlet extractor. An in-vitro analysis of the MIC and anti-biofilm efficacy of the extract was performed against standard strains of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, and Fusobacterium nucleatum using the broth dilution method and microtitre-crystal violet assay, respectively. The MIC activity of the PAM extracts was compared with Chlorhexidine as a standard.

Results: The MIC value of P. amboinicus extract was nearly similar to Chlorhexidine as assessed by the broth dilution method. The MIC of P. amboinicus extract for A.a and P.g was 0.4 μg/mL, F.n was 0.8 μg/mL, and the Chlorhexidine values against all three periodontal pathogens were 0.2 μg/mL. The anti-biofilm activity of The extract of PAMwas evaluated using the microtitre-crystal violet assay, and the Optical Density (OD) values were reduced after exposure to the extract, with a significant reduction (p<0.001) of the biofilm-forming bacteria observed.

Conclusion: The methanol extract of PAM demonstrated a noteworthy MIC, exhibiting effectiveness at a low concentration of 0.4 μg/mL against Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans in three repeated trials. Moreover, this extract displayed significant inhibitory effects on the biofilm formation of periodontal pathogens Porphyromonas gingivalis, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, and Fusobacterium nucleatum (Pg, Aa, Fn), suggesting its potential as an alternative to conventional chemical anti-microbials.

Keywords

Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Anti-biofilm, Concentration, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Porphyromonas gingivalis

Severe periodontal disease ranks as the eleventh most globally prevalent condition, and it is associated with dental plaque biofilm (1). A biofilm is a consortium of microorganisms attached to a biotic or abiotic surface. Sessile cells within a biofilm exhibit phenotypic and physiological differences compared to planktonic cells (2). One distinctive property illustrating the contrast between sessile and planktonic cells is the significantly higher concentrations of antimicrobial agents needed to eradicate sessile cells, in comparison to planktonic cells (2). Dental plaque was the first biofilm studied for its microbial composition and susceptibility to antimicrobial agents (3). The development of a biofilm such as dental plaque proceeds through a series of events including attachment, growth, removal, and re-attachment of bacteria, resulting in continuous re-organisation (4). Extracellular polymeric substances impede the mass transport of antibiotics through the biofilm, contributing to antimicrobial resistance (5). Biofilm bacteria are phenotypically different from planktonic cells, with increased tolerance to antimicrobial agents being a key factor. Microorganisms can develop antibiotic resistance through mutations, the presence of drug efflux pumps, and the production of neutralising enzymes. Even inherently sensitive organisms can exhibit apparent resistance when growing on a biofilm surface (6).

In the recent past, multiple drug resistance has emerged against many microbial infections due to the in-discriminate use of commercial antimicrobial drugs (7). Furthermore, antibiotics are occasionally linked to adverse effects on the host, including hypersensitivity, immune suppression, and allergic reactions (8). Therefore, a necessity exists to explore natural alternatives to existing antimicrobial agents by evaluating herbal extracts from alternative systems of medicine such as Ayurveda. Plectranthus, a large genus with over 300 species from the Lamiaceae family, exhibits a rich diversity of medicinal uses (9). P. amboinicus, locally known as PA or by names like bangun-bangun, bebangun, hati-hati hijau, or sedingin, is an indigenous vegetable that can be consumed fresh. The leaves of PA are said to possess anti-oxidant, anti-bacterial, anti-microbial, anti-inflammatory, and anti-fungal properties (9). Sabrina EMN et al., reported that the essential oil of PAM exhibited significant antimicrobial activity and suggested that this activity may be due to the presence of major monoterpenoid compounds, carvacrol, and camphor (9). Arumugam G et al., evaluated the PA plant and demonstrated a wide range of biological properties, proving its effectiveness in treating respiratory, cardiovascular, oral, skin, digestive, and urinary diseases (10). Manimekalai K et al., assessed the antibiofilm efficacy of PAM against Streptococcus pyogenes isolated from pharyngitis patients and concluded that the methanol extract of P. amboinicus leaves contained pharmacologically active components that could be used as an anti-biofilm agent at minimal concentrations, successfully preventing biofilm formation (11). Sivaranjani D et al., reported that PAM solvent extracts exhibited good antimicrobial activity against most human pathogenic bacteria and only one fungal yeast, Candida albicans (12). The aim of the present study was to assess the MIC of PAM solvent extract against pure strains of putative periodontal pathogens Porphyromonas gingivalis (ATCC 33277), Fusobacterium nucleatum (ATCC 25586), and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (ATCC 43718). Additionally, the antibiofilm activity of PAM solvent extract against the selected periodontal pathogens was also evaluated.

Material and Methods

An in-vitro study was conducted between December 2022 and March 2023. The study involved investigators from three departments: the Department of Periodontology at Sri Ramachandra Dental College and Hospital, the Department of Pharmacognosy at Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education in Chennai, and the Research Department of Molecular Biology and Immunology at Maratha Mandal’s NGH Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre in Belgaum, Karnataka, India. The ethics approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (CSP/22/MAR/106/69).

Commercially available PA dry powder was used (powder collected from Herbal Medicines and Botanicals in Tirunelveli). The PA leaf powdered samples were hermetically sealed in separate polythene bags until the time of extraction. The extract was prepared as mentioned below.

One hundred grams of powdered PA leaves were extracted successively with 400 mL of methanol in a Soxhlet extractor until the extract was clear (Table/Fig 1). The extracts were subjected to evaporation until dry, and the resultant paste was preserved by storing it in a refrigerator at 4°C for future use (12).

Three bacterial strains (P. gingivalis ATCC-33277, F. nucleatum ATCC-25586, A. actinomycetemcomitans ATCC-43718) were obtained from Maratha Mandal’s Central Research Laboratory in Belgaum.

Procedure

Stock preparation was conducted with 10 mg of the extract, which was then dissolved in 10% Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO). The MIC of the plant extract was evaluated following the protocol available in the published literature (13). In summary, the bacterial strains P. gingivalis (ATCC-33277), F. nucleatum (ATCC-25586), A. actinomycetemcomitans (ATCC-43718) were added to thioglycollate medium with Hemin and Vitamin K supplemented with the PAM or methanolic extract of PA at 10 different dilutions ranging from 0.2 to 100 μg/mL. Three test groups were established: Group-1 (Broth+extract+Pg), Group-2 (Broth+extract+F.n), Group-3 (Broth+extract+A.a). The positive control used was Chlorhexidine+Broth+Organism. The tubes were then incubated for 48-72 hours in an anaerobic jar at 37°C and observed for turbidity (Table/Fig 2). The experiment was repeated in triplicate.

A multispecies biofilm was established in a 96-well microtitre plate at baseline using Pg, Fn, Aa, and incubated for three days. The suspensions were removed from all the wells and washed with Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) (slowly to remove loosely attached biofilms). To determine anti-biofilm activity, a comparison was made between baseline and after exposure to the extract. Four groups were included in this assay: (i) only broth; (ii) Broth+Extract; (iii) Broth+Mix of organisms; (iv) Broth+Organisms+Extract (test group). The extract was added only in the test group and the broth+extract group, incubated for 30 minutes, and then washed with PBS. A 0.1% crystal violet solution was added to all the wells and incubated for 10 minutes, followed by a PBS rinse. Subsequently, 70% ethanol was added to dissolve all the crystal violet that was attached. This ethanol was collected in another microtitre plate, and OD values were assessed. Readings were taken in a spectrophotometer to determine the OD values (Table/Fig 3).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 software. Pearson’s Chi-square test and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) were employed to calculate the differences in the MIC of the PAM as compared to Chlorhexidine and the antibiofilm activity of the PAM against pure strains of periodontal pathogens, respectively. Values were deemed significantly different if the p-value was ≤0.05.

Results

The MIC was determined for Porphyromonas gingivalis, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, and Fusobacterium nucleatum (P.g, A.a, F.n) species treated with different concentrations of the PAM using the broth dilution method. The MIC was conducted in triplicates for each group. The MIC of PAM for A.a and P.g was 0.4 μg/mL, and for F.n was 0.8 μg/mL, as indicated by the absence of bacterial growth at these concentrations. The MIC of Chlorhexidine against all three periodontal pathogens was 0.2 μg/mL. The MIC values of the PAM against the three putative periodontal pathogens were lower than Chlorhexidine (Table/Fig 4). The Chi-square test was used to assess the difference in MIC values between the PAM extract and Chlorhexidine against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, and Fusobacterium nucleatum (P.g, A.a, F.n) species. When comparing both interventions, statistical significance could not be demonstrated, with p-values for Porphyromonas gingivalis being 0.173, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans being p=0.285, and Fusobacterium nucleatum was p=0.032 (Table/Fig 5).

The MIC of 1.6 μg/mL was selected for the antibiofilm assay. The difference in the OD values between the control groups (Broth+compound 0.85±0.03), (Broth+Mix of organisms 1.99±0.01), and the test group (Broth+Organisms+Extract 0.90±0.08) was assessed by ANOVA and was found to be statistically significant (p-value=0.0001) (Table/Fig 6).

Discussion

The null hypothesis of the present study was that the PAM extract would not exhibit antimicrobial effects against the chosen periodontal pathogens. However, based on the aforementioned results, the null hypothesis stands rejected. Bacterial biofilm, considered the fundamental cause of periodontitis, is associated with poor oral hygiene as it promotes bacteria accumulation (5). To limit bacterial resistance to antibiotics, antimicrobial agents from plant extracts are emerging as a potential mode to control the progression of periodontitis, as they demonstrate significant abilities to restrict bacterial biofilm formation and reduce the virulence of colonising microorganisms (14). Despite Chlorhexidine being universally recognised as the standard antimicrobial agent in periodontal treatment regimens, it can cause side effects such as teeth staining and altered taste sensation when used over an extended period (15). Plant extract-derived antimicrobial agents have been increasingly utilised on a global scale. Studies by Choi HA et al., and Mehdipour A et al., on the use of plant extracts as antibacterial and antibiofilm agents have illustrated the resurgence of medicinal plant extracts in dentistry, showcasing their efficacy and safety as alternatives to synthetic compounds, which may exhibit certain side effects with long-term use (16),(17).

Literature exists highlighting the anti-bacterial, anti-inflammatory, and anti-oxidant properties of PAM (18),(19),(20),(21),(22). Leu WJ et al., reported in an in-vitro study that a P. amboinicus extract (PA-F4) exhibited inhibitory activity on the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and also inhibited ATP-induced signaling pathways in LPS-primed cells (18). Swamy MK et al., demonstrated the presence of various soluble bioactive compounds in P. amboinicus leaf extracts contributing significantly to antioxidant and antimicrobial activities (19). The authors also noted that the methanolic extract contains more soluble phytocompounds, supporting the traditional medicinal use of P. amboinicus in treating various diseases (19). Therefore, in the present study, the authors prepared a methanol extract of P. amboinicus.

An in-vitro study by Nazliniwaty N and Laila L, reported that the antibacterial activity test of the 2% PA Spreng mouthwash successfully inhibited the growth of both Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus mutans (20). Some studies have identified active compounds such as p-cymene, thymol, β-caryophyllene, γ-terpinene, and secondary metabolites such as steroids, tannins, flavonoids, and alkaloids in extracts of PA (Lour) that have demonstrated anti-bacterial efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus (21),(22).

In the present study, key periodonto-pathogens such as Porphyromonas gingivalis (ATCC 33277), Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (ATCC 43718), and the bridging organism Fusobacterium nucleatum were chosen among the various putative periodontal pathogens. The antimicrobial activities of the extract were analysed by assessing MIC, after exposing the selected bacteria in the broth to P. amboinicus solvent extract at various dilutions. The present study results have shown that the MIC of PAM against P. gingivalis and A. actinomycetemcomitans was similar to chlorhexidine (CHX) and less effective against F. nucleatum. These results are consistent with the observations of Thaniarasu R et al., where the authors elucidated that the MIC of ethanolic extracts of Plectranthus bourneae possess antibacterial activities against certain Gram-positive and Gram negative organisms (23). A recent study by Chandra K et al., demonstrated that the ethanolic extract of P. amboinicus was effective at a low concentration of 50 μg/mL against four periodontopathogenic bacteria, namely Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), Prevotella intermedia (Pi), Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), and Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg) (24). However, Pg, Fn, and Pi organisms were found to be resistant at concentrations lower than 0.2 μg/mL, and Aa was found to be resistant at concentrations lower than 25 μg/mL. The present study results contradict the findings of Chandra K et al., where the MIC of the methanolic extract of P. amboinicus against A. actinomycetemcomitans was reported to be 0.2 μg/mL (24). The discrepancies in the results may be attributed to differences in the methods of preparation of the P. amboinicus extract used in the two studies.

Biofilm formation is crucial for the development of periodontal disease. The crystal violet microtiter assay was used to quantify the formed biofilm based on the optical density obtained. The antibiofilm activity of PAM was assessed at the chosen MIC of 1.6 μg/mL (this concentration was where all three periodontal pathogens assessed in this study showed sensitivity to the PAM). The extract-treated cells (Broth+organisms+extract) exhibited disorganisation of the biofilm, as identified by the reduced OD values compared to the control group (Broth+mix of organisms). This finding is in agreement with the observations of the previous study by Manimekalai K et al., where the authors demonstrated that the PAM extract inhibited the biofilm biomass significantly (p<0.05) in a dose-dependent manner at sub-MIC levels against S. pyogenes (11). Similar findings were reported by Harini K et al., against Streptococcus mutans using the aqueous extract of Vaccinium oxycoccos and PAM (25). To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to provide evidence of the antibiofilm activity of PA against selected periodontal pathogens.

The clinical implications of the study observations indicate that PAM extracts can be incorporated into mouthwashes and dentifrices as part of patient maintenance. P. amboinicus may serve as an effective alternative to synthetic antimicrobials like Chlorhexidine, which have long-term side effects.

Limitation(s)

As this is an in-vitro study, additional research efforts are required to apply the findings in in-vivo conditions. Since periodontitis is a polymicrobial disease, further detailed investigations should be aimed at understanding the effectiveness of the PAM extract in a multispecies community.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the PAM demonstrated a noteworthy MIC, showing effectiveness at a low concentration of 0.4 μg/mL against Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans in three repeated trials. Furthermore, this extract exhibited significant inhibitory effects on the biofilm formation of periodontal pathogens Porphyromonas gingivalis, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, and Fusobacterium nucleatum, suggesting its potential as an alternative to conventional chemical antimicrobials. Additionally, these results are the first of their kind in elucidating the role of the well known medicinal plant P. amboinicus in controlling biofilm formation by periodontal pathogens. However, further research is necessary to develop formulations containing P. amboinicus solvent extracts and to conduct human clinical trials to assess the efficacy of reducing biofilm formation by periodontal pathogens.

References

1.
Nazir M, Al-Ansari A, Al-Khalifa K, Alhareky M, Gaffar B, Almas K. Global prevalence of periodontal disease and lack of its surveillance. Scientific World Journal. 2020;2020:2146160. Doi: 10.1155/2020/2146160. PMID: 32549797; PMCID: PMC7275199. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet. 2001;358(9276):135-38. Doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05321-1. PMID: 11463434. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Marsh PD. Dental plaque as a microbial biofilm. Caries Res. 2004;38(3):204-11. Doi: 10.1159/000077756. PMID: 15153690. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Marsh PD, Bradshaw DJ. Microbiological effects of new agents in dentifrices for plaque control. Int Dent J. 1993;43(4 Suppl 1):399-406. PMID: 8282422.
5.
Marsh PD. Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community-implications for health and disease. BMC Oral Health. 2006;6(Suppl 1):S14. Doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-6-S1-S14. PMID: 16934115; PMCID: PMC2147593. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Gilbert P, Maira-Litran T, McBain AJ, Rickard AH, Whyte FW. The physiology and collective recalcitrance of microbial biofilm communities. Adv Microb Physiol. 2002;46:202-56. PMID: 12073654. [crossref]
7.
Aslam B, Wang W, Arshad MI, Khurshid M, Muzammil S, Rasool MH, et al. Antibiotic resistance: A rundown of a global crisis. Infect Drug Resist. 2018;11:1645-58. Doi: 10.2147/IDR.S173867. PMID: 30349322; PMCID: PMC6188119. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Upadhyay RK. Tulsi: A holy plant with high medicinal and therapeutic value. International Journal of Green Pharmacy. 2017;11(1):S1-S12.
9.
Sabrina EMN, Razali M, Mirfat AHS, Mohd Shukri MA. Antimicrobial activity and bioactive evaluation of Plectranthus amboinicus essential oil. Am J Res Commun. 2014;2(12):121-27.
10.
Arumugam G, Swamy MK, Sinniah UR. Plectranthus amboinicus (Lour.) Spreng: Botanical, phytochemical, pharmacological and nutritional significance. Molecules. 2016;21(4):369. Doi: 10.3390/molecules21040369. PMID: 27043511; PMCID: PMC6274163. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Manimekalai K, Srinivasan P, Dineshbabu J, Guna G, Teepica Priya Darsini D. Anti-biofilm efficacy of Plectranthus amboinicus against streptococcus pyogenes isolated from pharyngitis patients. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2016;9(4):348-54.
12.
Sivaranjani D, Saranraj P, Manigandan M, Amala K. Antimicrobial activity of Plectranthus amboinicus solvent extracts against Human Pathogenic Bacteria and Fungi. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2019;9(3):36-39. [crossref]
13.
Schwalbe R, Steele-Moore L, Goodwin AC. (Eds.). (2007). Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocols (1st ed.). CRC Press. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420014495. [crossref]
14.
Joseph RA, Sabarish R, Muthukumar S, Bhat K, Balaji SK. Comparative evaluation on the effect of herbal mouthwash on putative periodontal pathogens-In-vitro study. RJPT. 2023;16(1):97-102. [crossref]
15.
McCoy LC, Wehler CJ, Rich SE, Garcia RI, Miller DR, Jones JA. Adverse events associated with chlorhexidine use: results from the department of veterans affairs dental diabetes study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139(2):178-83. Doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0134. PMID: 18245686. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Choi HA, Cheong DE, Lim HD, Kim WH, Ham MH, Oh MH, et al. Antimicrobial and Anti-Biofilm Activities of the Methanol Extracts of Medicinal Plants against Dental Pathogens Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;27(7):1242-48. Doi: 10.4014/jmb.1701.01026. PMID: 28478657. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Mehdipour A, Ehsani A, Samadi N, Ehsani M, Sharifinejad N. The antimicrobial and antibiofilm effects of three herbal extracts on Streptococcus mutans compared with Chlorhexidine 0.2% (in-vitro study). J Med Life. 2022;15(4):526-32. Doi: 10.25122/jml-2021-0189. PMID: 35646170; PMCID: PMC9126453.[crossref][PubMed]
18.
Leu WJ, Chen JC, Guh JH. Extract from plectranthus amboinicus inhibit maturation and release of interleukin 1β through inhibition of NF-κB nuclear translocation and NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:573. Doi: 10.3389/ fphar.2019.00573. PMID: 31191313; PMCID: PMC6546882. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Swamy MK, Arumugam G, Kaur R, Ghasemzadeh A, Yusoff MM, Sinniah UR. GC-MS based metabolite profiling, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of different solvent extracts of malaysian plectranthus amboinicus leaves. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2017;2017:1517683. Doi: 10.1155/2017/1517683. Epub 2017 Mar 23. PMID: 28424737; PMCID: PMC5382359. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Nazliniwaty N, Laila L. Formulation and antibacterial activity of plectranthus amboinicus (lour.) spreng leaves ethanolic extract as herbal mouthwash against halitosis caused bacteria. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(22):3900-03. Doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.529. PMID: 32128001; PMCID: PMC7048360. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Costa J, Pereira C, Rodrigues F, De Lima S. Chemical composition, antibacterial and fungicidal activities of leaf oil of plectranthus amboinicus (Lour.) Spreng. J Essent Oil Res. 2010;22(2):183-85. [crossref]
22.
Ismayil S, Nimila PJ. Antimicrobial activity of plectranthus amboinicus (lour.) Against gram negative bacteria klebsiella pneumoniae and shigella flexneri and their phytochemical tests. Int J Health Sci Res. 2019;9(5):304-11.
23.
Thaniarasu R, Senthil Kumar T, Abubacker MN, Rao MV. Preliminary phytochemical screening and evaluation of antibacterial activity of different solvent extracts of Plectranthus bourneae Gamble (Lamiaceae). Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2015;8(1):79-82.
24.
Chandra K, Thomas R, Shah R, Mehta DS. Efficacy of Plectranthus Amboinicus (Indian Borage) gel as an adjunct to scaling in management of patients with chronic gingivitis. WJPMR. 2021;7(1):163-68.
25.
Harini K, Janani K, Teja KV, Mohan C, Sukumar M. Formulation and evaluation of oral disintegrating films using a natural ingredient against Streptococcus mutans. J Conserv Dent. 2022;25(2):128-34. Doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_143_21. Epub 2022 May 4. PMID: 35720822; PMCID: PMC9205350.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/67836.19311

Date of Submission: Oct 09, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Dec 14, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Feb 16, 2024
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 09, 2023
• Manual Googling: Dec 12, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Feb 14, 2024 (15%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com