Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 33140

Original article / research
Table of Contents - Year : 2017 | Month : January | Volume : 11 | Issue : 1 | Page : ZC118 - ZC121

Comparison of Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Derived Alveolar Bone Density Between Subjects with and without Aggressive Periodontitis ZC118-ZC121

Mohammad S. Al-Zahrani, Eman Y. ElFirt, Manea M. Al-Ahmari, Ibrahim A. Yamany,Maher A. Alabdulkarim, Khalid H. Zawawi

Dr. Khalid H. Zawawi,
Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box: 80209, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia

Introduction: Understanding the changes in bone density of patients affected by aggressive periodontitis could be useful in early disease detection and proper treatment planning.

Aim:The aim of this study was to compare alveolar bone density in patients affected with aggressive periodontitis and periodontally healthy individuals using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).

Materials and Methods:This cross-sectional study was conducted on 20 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of aggressive periodontitis. Twenty periodontally healthy patients attending the dental clinics for implant placement or extraction of impacted third molars served as controls. Alveolar bone density was measured using CBCT scanning. Comparisons between aggressive periodontitis group and controls for age and alveolar bone density of the anterior and posterior regions were performed using an independent sample t-test. Multivariable linear regression models were also performed.

Results: The differences between groups in regard to age, anterior and posterior alveolar bone density was not statistically significant (p<0.05). In the posterior region, the multivariable regression model showed that bone density was not associated with age, gender or the study groups. Whereas, in the anterior region, patient’s age was found to be significantly associated with bone density, p=0.014.

Conclusion: Alveolar bone density as measured by CBCT in aggressive periodontitis patients was not different from periodontally healthy individuals. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.