Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 74224

Original article / research
Table of Contents - Year : 2016 | Month : August | Volume : 10 | Issue : 8 | Page : ZC057 - ZC062

Evaluation of Outcome Following Coronectomy for the Management of Mandibular Third Molars in Close Proximity to Inferior Alveolar Nerve ZC057-ZC062

Subhadeep Mukherjee, BhaSkarapandiyan Vikraman, Duraiswamy Sankar, Muthu subramanian Veerabahu

Dr. Duraiswamy Sankar,
Reader, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ragas Dental College and Hospital,
2/102, East Coast Road, Uthandi, Chennai, Tamilnadu-600 119, India.

Introduction: Iatrogenic damage to Inferior Alveolar Nerve (IAN) is a significant risk factor following prophylactic or therapeutic removal of impacted mandibular third molar. The risk to IAN injury increases many fold, when the third molar root overlaps the nerve canal as identified by the radiographic imaging. Various methods like orthodontic assisted extraction, staged removal of tooth or coronectomy have been advocated to reduce the incidence of IAN injury in high risk cases with variable outcome.

Aim: The aim of present study was to evaluate the fate of the root (resorbed, exfoliated, covered by bone) after coronectomy or intentional root retention of impacted mandibular 3rd molars in patients with high risk for inferior alveolar nerve damage as evaluated by the intra oral periapical radiograph.

Materials and Methods: Twenty impacted mandibular third molar teeth, in 18 patients with high risk of injury to IAN based on Roodís Criteria in an intra oral periapical radiographic examination, between the age group of 18 to 40 years, were included in the study. Preoperatively the impacted third molars were evaluated clinically as well as radiographically. Pederson Difficulty Index and Winterís Classification of impacted tooth was recorded. Coronectomy was done at the cemento enamel junction leaving the roots 2-3mm below the alveolar crest and primary closure was done. Patients were evaluated periodically for two years at six months interval. Post operative pain, swelling, IAN injury or any other complications were observed and recorded.

Results: None of the patients had IAN injury and none required second surgical removal. There was no incidence of post-operative infection and none required second surgical intervention. However, two of our patients had failed coronectomy (10%) due to mobilization of roots intra operatively and the roots were removed. One patient developed profuse bleeding intra-operatively in the failed coronectomy case. One patient had temporary lingual nerve paresthesia.

Conclusion: Coronectomy procedure is effective in controlling inferior alveolar nerve injury following third molar surgery, in radiographically evaluated high risk cases and it has very low incidence of complications.