Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 5836

Original article / research
Table of Contents - Year : 2016 | Month : April | Volume : 10 | Issue : 4 | Page : ZC94 - ZC99

Demystifying the Enigma of Smoking An Observational Comparative Study on Tobacco Smoking ZC94-ZC99

Ayesha Thabusum Dharmavaram, Rajesh Nallakunta, Sudhakara Reddy Reddy, Sai Kiran Chennoju

Dr. Ayesha Thabusum Dharmavaram,
Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Drs Sudha and Nageswara Rao Siddhartha
Institute of Dental Sciences, Gannavaram Mandal, Krishna district, Andhra Pradesh-521101, India.

Introduction: Smoking is a hazardous habit which causes definite changes in the oral cavity, consequently there exist changes in the mucosa when subjected to smoking. Palatal mucosa is first to be affected. The present study determines the palatal status in reverse smokers and conventional smokers.

Aim: To study and compare the clinical, cytological and histopathological changes in palatal mucosa among reverse and conventional smokers.

Materials and Methods: Study sample was categorized into two groups. Group 1 comprised of 20 subjects with the habit of reverse smoking and Group 2 comprised of 20 subjects with the habit of conventional smoking. Initially, clinical appearance of the palatal mucosa was recorded, followed by a cytological smear and biopsy of the involved area among all the subjects. The findings were studied clinically, the specimens were analysed cytologically and histopathologically, and compared among the two groups.

Results: The severity of clinical changes of the palatal mucosa among reverse smokers was statistically significant when compared to those of conventional smokers. There was no statistically significant difference observed in cytological staging between the groups with a p-value of 0.35. The histopathological changes in both the groups showed a significant difference with a p-value of 0.02. A significant positive correlation was observed between the clinical appearance, and cytological, histopathological changes.

Conclusion: Profound clinically aggressive changes were observed in group I compared to group II. Severity of dysplastic changes have been detected in few subjects through histopathological examination irrespective of no prominent clinical and cytological changes observed among the two groups.