Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 15019

Original article / research
Table of Contents - Year : 2016 | Month : April | Volume : 10 | Issue : 4 | Page : ZC76 - ZC80

Management of Chronic Periodontitis Using Chlorhexidine Chip and Diode Laser-A Clinical Study ZC76-ZC80

Kachapilly Arun Jose, Majo Ambooken, Jayan Jacob Mathew, Annie Valayil Issac, Ajithkumar Parachalil Kunju, Renjith Athirkandathil Parameshwaran

Correspondence
Dr. Kachapilly Arun Jose,
Post Graduate Student, Department of Periodontics, Mar Baselios Dental College, Kothamangalam, Kerala-686691, India.
E-mail: tsbkgem@gmail.com

Introduction: The use of adjuncts like chlorhexidine local delivery and diode laser decontamination have been found to improve the clinical outcomes of scaling and root planing in non-surgical periodontal therapy in patients with chronic periodontitis.

Aim: To evaluate the effects of diode laser and chlorhexidine chip as adjuncts to scaling and root planing in the management of chronic periodontitis. The objective is to evaluate the outcome of chlorhexidine chip and diode laser as adjuncts to scaling and root planing on clinical parameters like Plaque Index, Gingival Index, probing pocket depth and clinical attachment level.

Study and Design: Department of Periodontics. Randomized clinical trial with split mouth design. Materials and Methods: Fifteen chronic periodontitis patients having a probing pocket depth of 5mm-7mm on at least one interproximal site in each quadrant of the mouth were included in the study. After initial treatment, four sites in each patient were randomly subjected to scaling and root planing (control), chlorhexidine chip application (CHX chip group), diode laser (810 nm) decontamination (Diode laser group) or combination of both (Diode laser and chip group). Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were assessed at baseline, one month and three months.

Statistical analysis: Results were statistically analysed using paired T test, one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD test and repeated measure ANOVA.

Results: Post-treatment, the test and control sites showed a statistically significant reduction in PI, GI, PPD, and CAL. After three months, a mean PPD reduction of 1.47±0.52 mm in control group, 1.40±0.83 mm in diode laser group, 2.67±0.62 mm in CHX group, and 2.80± 0.77 mm in combination group was seen. The mean gain in CAL were 1.47±0.52 mm in the control group, 1.40±0.83 mm in diode laser group, 2.67± 0.49 mm in CHX group and 2.67± 0.82 mm in combination group respectively. The differences in PPD reduction and CAL gain between control group and CHX chip and combination groups were statistically significant (p<0.05) at three months, whereas, the diode laser group did not show any significant difference from the control group.

Conclusion: Chlorhexidine local delivery alone or in combination with diode laser decontamination is effective in reducing probing pocket depth and improving clinical attachment levels when used as adjuncts to scaling and root planing in non-surgical periodontal therapy of patients with chronic periodontitis.