Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 38627

Original article / research
Table of Contents - Year : 2016 | Month : March | Volume : 10 | Issue : 3 | Page : PC23 - PC26

Ileostomy for Non-Traumatic Ileal Perforations: Is this the Beginning of the End? PC23-PC26

Rajashekara Gangappa Babu, Adithya Malolan, Prashanth Basappa Chowdary

Dr. Adithya Malolan Patanki,
Department of General Surgery, Victoria Hospital, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute,
KR Road, Bangalore-560002, India.

Introduction: Ileal perforations are a common place of occurrence in emergency operation rooms around India. They are also significant contributors to mortality in our country. They are very distressing for patients because of the high morbidity of a laparotomy and in certain cases a stoma if its necessity is felt by the operating surgeon. The nature of the disease itself predisposes to a number of complications including wound infections, faecal fistulas and complications associated with a stoma.

Aim: To evaluate the role of ileostomy in patients with non-traumatic ileal perforation.

Materials and Methods: A total of 192 cases of ileal perforation, diagnosed per-operatively, were prospectively studied between June 2012 and July 2014. Cases were treated according to standard resuscitation protocols and underwent repair of the ileal perforation either as primary closure or as a bowel resection and anastomosis with or without a proximal diversion ileostomy. Cases were followed up for a period of six months and immediate and late complications and outcomes were noted.

Results: A total of 192 patients were studied during the given study period out of which 170 (88.5%) were males. The disease was treated primarily without diversion stoma in 176 patients and in 16 patients a proximal diversion ileostomy was performed. The overall mortality was 15 (7.8%) that was noted to be not significantly different in patients with respect to the performance of a stoma. Enterocutaneous fistula was a complication seen exclusively in the non-ileostomy group whereas stomal complications were expectedly noted only in the stoma group.

Conclusion: The authors found that though conventional ileostomy diversion may appear a safe option in patients with ileal perforations, it has its own additional morbidity, which at times can be very difficult to manage. An ileostomy is of use in a very small group of patients that is diminishing as better facilities and equipment are obtained to manage this dreaded disease.