Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 103488

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2024 | Month : February | Volume : 18 | Issue : 2 | Page : VD03 - VD05 Full Version

Reverse Intermetamorphosis Coexisting in a Case of Capgras Syndrome with Delusion of Subjective Doubles


Published: February 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/68882.19053
Ishani Roy Chatterjee

1. Senior Resident, Department of Psychiatry, KPC MCH, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Ishani Roy Chatterjee,
Flat 26, 10, Judges Court Road, Alipore, Kolkata-700027, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: ishaniroy10@gmail.com

Abstract

‘Delusional misidentification syndrome’ is a fascinating phenomenon in which an individual misidentifies person, place, object or even themselves and falsely believes that they have been replaced or some sort of transformation has occurred. Capgras delusion, Fregoli delusion, Intermetamorphosis, Delusion of subjective doubles, all these phenomena broadly come under the psychiatric disorder of delusional misidentification syndromes. This case was established by its clinical characteristics along with associated clinical findings, the patient’s response to treatment in concurrence with psychological and neuro-cognitive theories. The present case report suggests that these symptomatology of misperception, miscomprehension and misinterpretation of others and of self are probably more prevalent than thought previously and should be actively sought and recognised in patients. This article sought to showcase a phenomenon which had a rare component of Reverse Intermetamorphosis along with Capgras Syndrome and Delusion of Subjective Doubles having no organic component in a 22 year old male patient who responded to pharmacotherapy with neuroleptics. The psychopathological symptoms demonstrating Capgras in itself is rare and inadequately researched. Presence of three distinctive patterns of symptomatology together in one subject is intriguingly unique.

Keywords

Delusional misidentification syndromes, Doppelgänger, Olanzapine, Schizophrenia

Case Report

A 22-year-old male college student was brought to the Outpatient Department (OPD) by his parents for his belief that his parents were not actually his and had been replaced by someone else (Capgras syndrome) which had started 20 days prior to the current consultation and gradually worsened. He believed that his parents had been “superimposed” by impostors. The patient was suspicious of his family members and felt that they wanted to harm him. He had reportedly been staying awake throughout the night and making repeated trips in the parents’ bedroom to check their activities. The patient reportedly kept on touching the mothers face and muttering to self that she was not his real mother and “this one” was made of plastic. Due to the fear of being poisoned by the family members he had started to refuse food made at home and had started staying isolated from them.

The patient also believed that a “carbon copy” of him existed (Delusion of Subjective doubles) and that person was trying to somehow harm him and take his place in this world. He was sure that this “other him” had some ulterior motives and wanted to replace him. He mentioned that this copy of his stayed in the same house as him and was scheming with his parents against him. He had allegedly seen this “other him”.

Recently the patient had been feeling that at times he was actually his cousin brother and the real him had been kidnapped and sent away somewhere. He felt that he was physically and mentally changing into his cousin and that he was losing his own self and becoming someone else (Reverse Intermetamorphosis).

The patient was unable to attend college due to excessive paranoia leading to hampering of scholastic performance. There had been impairment in various facets of his life due to the same.

No history of past psychiatric illness or substance use was present. No significant family history or history of any genetic disorder, seizure disorder or head trauma could be elicited. The patient’s birth and developmental history was uneventful. The patient had a well-adjusted premorbid personality however he revealed having a strained relationship with his real father who pressurised him constantly regarding his performance in school.

Examination revealed the patient was oriented to time, place and person and was cooperative. He was alert and conscious. Eye contact was fleeting and was maintained with difficulty during the interview. Rapport was established with relative difficulty. Vitals including Blood Pressure (BP), Pulse Rate (PR), Respiratory Rate (RR), Temperature and Saturation of Peripheral Oxygen (SpO2) were normal. General and Systemic Examinations did not reveal any abnormalities.

Mental Status Examination revealed a well-groomed male, dressed appropriately to his socio-economic status and age with normal psychomotor activity. The patient was cooperative albeit a little hesitant at the starting of the session. Eye contact was fleeting with the patient glancing suspiciously at his family members repeatedly. He seemed hypervigilant and anxious.

The patient was communicative with spontaneous, soft but coherent speech and repeatedly mentioned about the family members being impostors.

His mood was irritable and congruent to thought. He had a fixed belief that his parents and younger sister were not real and were merely impostors who wanted to harm him. This belief persisted despite evidence to the contrary. There were no other delusions or perceptual abnormalities. His general fund of knowledge was average, insight and judgement was poor. However, there were no memory or cognitive impairments.

Base line investigations did not reveal any abnormalities. Routine blood tests were done and there was no abnormality detected in Complete Blood Count (CBC), Kidney Function Test (KFT), Liver Function Test (LFT), Thyroid function Test (TFT), Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS), Post Prandial Blood Sugar (PPBS) and Blood for B12 and Folate. Serum Prolactin level was normal. Serology for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B surface Antigen (HBsAg), and anti-Hepatitis C Virus (Anti-HCV) were non-reactive. Urine for toxicology did not reveal any abnormalities. Electroencephalography (EEG) and Computed Tomography Scan (CT scan) of brain were normal. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of brain did not reveal any abnormalities.

Patient was started on Olanzapine 5 mg which was increased to 10 mg. The patient showed improvement on follow-up sessions and subsequently stabilised on 15 mg Olanzapine. During follow-up visit he was diagnosed as a case of Schizophrenia due to persisting delusions beyond one month.

Discussion

Misidentification syndromes are psychiatric disorders which mainly involve disparity in the normal process of people recognition. In these cases, patients normally misidentify objects, places, persons or even themselves. They falsely believe that all those things have either been transformed or have been replaced. Reverse Intermetamorphosis is a sub-category of Intermetamorphosis (1),(2). It is a delusional belief where there is a radical change in both physical and psychological identities of the self (3),(4).

Most common amongst these syndromes is the Capgras Syndrome or as it is known Capgras delusion. First identified in 1923 by Joseph Capgras and Reboul-Lachaux. In this phenomenon, the patient has a false belief that a familiar person has been replaced by an impostor (4),(5),(6),(7),(8). Courbon P and Fail G first described Fregoli delusion in the year 1927 (9). Here, the patient believes that a person who is most often not known to the patient is actually in disguise and that person is someone the patient knows. The patient often feels that he is being pursued or he is being persecuted by that person in disguise (7),(8). In Subjective doubles delusion, the patient firmly believes that there is another individual same as him, who exists and who functions independently. It is characterised by a perception that the doppelgänger shares the same identity and personality as the patient himself. He does not only look the same, it actually is the patient’s double (10).

In 1932, the syndrome of Intermetamorphosis was first coined by Courbon P and Tusque. They distinguished Fregoli syndrome from Intermetamorphosis by the fact that there is false recognition without false physical resemblance in Fregoli, whereas both are present in Intermetamorphosis (7),(11). In this phenomenon, there is a belief that there is transformation of both physical and psychological identity into someone else and in cases of Reverse Intermetamorphosis syndrome, which is a rare sub-type, the patient believes that he or she has themselves gained a new identity both physical and psychological (12).

There are rare studies showing the division of percentage of the misidentification syndromes one being a study by Silva JA et al., where percentage of Capgras and Intermetamorphosis delusion was found to be 36% and 22% respectively and percentage of Reverse Intermetamorphosis was found to be even lesser (4).

In earlier reports, that was in the period of 1923, patients having Capgras, a rare clinical condition were all females which led to a belief that Capgras in actuality is gender specific, that was in the period of 1923 (13),(14). Murray JR in 1936 reported a case of a male who had this syndrome. Though it is rare, it corroborates the finding of our research article (13). This case is a typical Capgras syndrome in which the patient misidentifies that his parents are not his own and they have been replaced by imposters associated with a delusion of subjective doubles with a belief that his duplicate resides in his home.

It is a documented fact that in ‘misidentification syndrome’ individuals tend to misperceive and miscomprehend close people emotionally or geographically as it happened in this patient.

When considering relationship status, the percentage of misidentification accounts for 22% in parents, significantly more in the mother (14%). In the same scenario, spouses or siblings were infrequently misperceived, with percentages of 10% and 7% respectively (4),(15).

This present case report is significantly uncommon because the characteristic of Reverse Intermetamorphosis (belief that he is himself changing into another person) is coexisting with the other two syndromes which is rare. Capgras seems to be relatively common amongst the different types of misidentification syndromes. It is reported that the syndromes are mostly associated with right hemispheric lesions with 25%-50% of patients with Capgras having organic aetiology (11),(16).

However, our patient did not exhibit any signs of any organic detriment which was corroborated by the documented findings of Bell V et al., in 2017 (17). In that study amongst 84 cases of identified delusional Capgras syndrome, 40 patients underwent some form of neuroimaging. 14 of them came out with some form of abnormality amongst which diffused bilateral pathology was found in 9. Right-sided pathology was least common (17).

In a more recent study from London mental health trust, out of 34 patients with Capgras delusion 7 had neuroimaging investigations and no cases had any sort of right-sided abnormalities (18).

There was a one-time suggestion that impaired facial recognition which is very similar to Prosopagnosia leads to Capgras delusion. However, the theory was soon discounted (15),(19). In the same study by Pandis C et al., it was reported that the most frequent diagnosis was of schizophrenia, organic psychosis and dementia (15).

An interesting fact in the present case is that the subject believes and perceives that the doppelgänger is residing in the same residence as him and is trying to harm him harboring a motive of replacing him from this world. He however, does not have any suicidal or homicidal thoughts unlike a study done by Barbieri C et al., in 2022 where the subject was homicidal (10). Just like in the above quoted report where the patient believed that the family was against him, this particular patient also perceived his doppelgänger and his parents as adversaries.

Our patient had autoscopic experience (self-perception). He lacked proper insight of his problem. This occurrence is incorporated by some authors in the definition of doppelgänger phenomenon like Faguet RA, 1979 who defined autoscopy as a syndrome where a vision of oneself is hallucinated with retainment of insight (20). Our case can be explained in a less restrictive fashion as that of Mora JD et al., 1980 who referred to the phenomenon of duplication of a real person without further qualifying it (21).

Unlike the original Capgras, there is a dilemma in detecting the actual cause of patients having delusion of subjective doubles. It is unclear as documented in a case described by Christodoulou whether the belief is simply abnormal or the patient actually perceives the doppelgänger. There have been attempts to understand the root of these experiences regarding whether these recollections were associated with false memories of familiarity (deja vu) (7). The case report by Christodoulou GN et al., elaborates upon one of the inadequately researched and remarked upon aspect of delusional misidentification, ie. “the false physical resemblance”. In this, a subject looks at a physically distinct face and a judgement is made which is actually an erroneous belief that his own face and body is identical to that one (7).

Generally it has been seen that patients of this type of syndromes view their perceived adversaries with hostility and suspicion. Usually the thoughts are not acted upon but serious threat and injuries have been known to occur. Our patient had suspicion, however, he did not show any hostile attitude towards his parents and did not try to harm others or himself (4),(22).

In Reverse Intermetamorphosis i.e., Inverted Intermetamorphosis, the focus is not on the surroundings of the subject but the subject himself (23),(24). Our subject believed himself to be changing into his cousin brother.

In research findings of meta-analysis conducted pertaining to neuroimaging studies of brain and brain networks, indicated differential affectation in between psychiatric and neurological conditions. In neurological disorders, involvement of basal ganglia, temporal cortex (lateral and medial), insula, medial and frontal cortex was prominent, whereas, cortical affectation of cingulate (anterior and posterior), superior frontal gyrus and also occipital area was disproportionately prominent in psychiatric diseases. This difference in neuro anatomical areas involved is significant in differentiating functional and organic delusion of misidentification syndromes by neuroimaging techniques (15),(25).

Due to the rarity of the ‘delusional misidentification syndromes’ and associated psychopathological variations in current repertoire of available studies, there is a lack of concrete treatment guidelines. The current literature highlights the role of antipsychotics like olanzapine and haloperidol (24),(26). Olanzapine was used in our patient with symptomatic improvement. A study by de León OA and Ovidio in 1992 reported that a combination of haloperidol with valproic acid worked successfully as pharmaco-therapeutic treatment of delusional misidentification syndromes (27). Another case report, however, countered treatment with neuroleptics to be ineffective and suggested the use of clorazepate (28). A case reported by Yiğman F et al., 2020 reported non- response with antipsychotics like quetiapine, olanzapine, risperidone and had a significant response only after Electro Convulsive Therapy (ECT) administration (29).

Conclusion

This case is a fascinating psychopathological phenomenon which presented with a vast milieu of psychiatric syndromes which included Capgras syndrome, Syndrome of subjective doubles and Reverse Intermetamorphosis. An adult male with no past psychiatric history presented with a vast psychopathological symptomatology encompassing Capgras, Delusion of subjective doubles and Reverse Intermetamorphosis.

Subtle differences in the nuances between functional and organic cases could be perceived, demonstrated and substantiated by the level of associated psychopathology, the delusional content, the neuropsychological assessment and the biomedical investigations. The present case gravitates towards a functional pathology by presentation of multiple imposters, subjective doubles and additional delusions. Whereas, patients having a neurological pathology mostly report spouse related delusions or present with visual hallucinations.

This unique case elucidated three distinctive psychopathological phenomenon-Capgras, Subjective Doubles delusion and Reverse Intermetamorphosis coexisting in one individual indicating the necessity of more extensive research in this domain.

Acknowledgement

The author would like to extend their sincere gratitude and thanks to Dr. Barnini Banerjee for her valuable contribution and insights in the making of this case report. Author extends heartfelt thanks to Mr. Kaushik Roy for adding value to this case and enriching it. Author would like to thank their parents for their constant support and encouragement.

References

1.
Cipriani G, Vedovello M, Ulivi M, Lucetti C, Di Fiorino A, Nuti A. Delusional misidentification syndromes and dementia: A border zone between neurology and psychiatry. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2013;28(7):671-78. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Sathe H, Karia S, De Sousa A, Shah N. Capgras syndrome: A case report. Med Sci. 2014;3(8):134-35. [crossref]
3.
Silva AA, Leong GB, Shaner AL. A classification system for misidentification syndromes. Psychopathology. 1990;23(1):27-32. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Silva JA, Leong GB, Weinstock R. The dangerousness of persons with misidentification syndromes. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1992;20(1):77-86.
5.
Ellis HD, Whitley J, Luauté JP. Delusional misidentification: The three original papers on the Capgras, Frégoli and intermetamorphosis delusions. Hist Psychiatry. 1994;5(17, Pt 1):117-46. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Christodoulou GN, Margariti M, Kontaxakis VP, Christodoulou NG. The delusional misidentification syndromes: Strange, fascinating, and instructive. Curr psychiatry reports. 2009;11(3):185-89. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Oyebode F. Psychopathology of rare and unusual syndromes. RCPsych Publications; 2021. [crossref]
8.
Bougatf S, Hamdi G. Uxoricide by a schizophrenic patient with delusional misidentification syndromes: A case report. Clin Case Rep. 2022;10(8):e6242. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Courbon P, Fail G. Syndrome d’ “illusion de Frégoli” et schizophrénie’. Bulletin de la société Clinique de médecine mentale. 1927;20:121-25.
10.
Barbieri C, Rocca G, Bosco C, Tattoli L, Grattagliano I, Di Vella G. The Doppelgänger phenomenon and death: A peculiar case of homicide by a subject with first-episode psychosis. Forensic Sci Res. 2022;7(4):798-802. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Ellis HD, Young AW. Accounting for delusional misidentifications. BJ Psych. 1990;157(2):239-48. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Arisoy O, Tufan AE, Bilici R, Taskiran S, Topal Z, Demir N, et al. The comorbidity of reduplicative paramnesia, intermetamorphosis, reverse-intermetamorphosis, misidentification of reflection, and capgras syndrome in an adolescent patient. Case Rep Psychiatry. 2014;2014:01-03. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Murray JR. A case of Capgras’s syndrome in the male. J Ment Sci. 1936;82(336):63-66. [crossref]
14.
Bland RC. Capgras’ syndrome: A case report. Can Psychiatr Assoc J. 1971;16(4):369-71. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Pandis C, Agrawal N, Poole N. Capgras’ delusion: A systematic review of 255 published cases. Psychopathology. 2019;52(3):161-73. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Gibson RC, Lowe GA, Morgan KA, Henry M, De La Haye W, Irons A. Capgras syndrome presenting in an adolescent girl in the Caribbean. West Indian Med J. 2013;62(1):95-98.
17.
Bell V, Marshall C, Kanji Z, Wilkinson S, Halligan P, Deeley Q. Uncovering Capgras delusion using a large-scale medical records database. BJP sych open. 2017;3(4):179-85. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Currell EA, Werbeloff N, Hayes JF, Bell V. Cognitive neuropsychiatric analysis of an additional large Capgras delusion case series. Cogn neuropsychiatry. 2019;24(2):123-34. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Enoch D, Puri BK, Ball H. Uncommon psychiatric syndromes. Routledge; 5th Edition 2020. [crossref]
20.
Faguet RA. With the eyes of the mind: Autoscopic phenomena in the hospital setting. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1979;1(4):311-14. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Mora JD, Jenner FA, Eacott SE. On heautoscopy or the phenomenon of the double: Case presentation and review of the literature. Br J Med Psychol. 1980;53(1):75-83. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
De Pauw KW, Szulecka TK. Dangerous delusions: Violence and the misidentification syndromes. BJ Psych. 1988;152(1):91-96. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Hanin B, Perlow M, Ben-Daniel N, Itzhaki S. Reverse intermetamorphosis-A rare misidentification phenomenon. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 1994;31(4):296-99.
24.
Leis K, Mazur E, Racinowski M, Jamroz? ek T, Gole? biewski J, Gala? zka P, et al. Delusional misidentification syndrome: Dissociation between recognition and identification processes. Acta Neuropsychologica. 2019;17:456-67. [crossref]
25.
Crossley NA, Scott J, Ellison-Wright I, Mechelli A. Neuroimaging distinction between neurological and psychiatric disorders. BJ Psych. 2015;207(5):429-34. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Aziz VM, Rodgers S. Capgras syndrome of time: A case study. Neuro Neurosurg. 2019.
27.
de León OA. The intermetamorphosis syndrome. J Clin Psychiatry. 1992;53(1):29-30.
28.
Joseph AB. Delusional misidentification of the Capgras and intermetamorphosis types responding to clorazepate: A case report. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1987;75(3):330-32. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Yiğman F, Bulut SD, Efe C. Side effects, treatment resistance and reverse intermetamorphosis syndrome: A case report and theoretical review. Isr J Psychiatry. 2020;57(2):59-62.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/68882.19053

Date of Submission: Nov 30, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Dec 20, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jan 16, 2024
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 01, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jan 11, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Jan 13, 2024 (4%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com