Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 101724

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : February | Volume : 18 | Issue : 2 | Page : TC01 - TC06 Full Version

Spectrum of Radiological Findings in Pulmonary Tuberculosis- A Tertiary Care Hospital-based Retrospective Descriptive Study


Published: February 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/67334.19037
GV Vishnupriyasriee, Ravipati Chakradhar, Muralidharan Yuvaraj, Ramakrishnan Karthik Krishna, Pitchandi Muthiah

1. Undergraduate Student, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Saveetha Medical College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Postgraduate Resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Saveetha Medical College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Saveetha Medical College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Saveetha Medical College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Saveetha Medical College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Ramakrishnan Karthik Krishna,
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, No. 1, Saveetha Nagar, Thandalam, Chennai-602105, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: kkdrkrradio@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Tuberculosis is a worldwide public health problem associated with high morbidity and mortality. Tuberculosis can manifest in active and latent forms. Improving the diagnosis, treatment, and screening of tuberculosis is crucial for effective tuberculosis control. Chest X-ray and Computed Tomography chest play a vital role in diagnosing and screening for tuberculosis.

Aim: To analyse the spectrum of radiological findings in pulmonary tuberculosis.

Materials and Methods: The present retrospective descriptive study was conducted at a teritary care hospital in the Department of Radiodiagnosis, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. The data of 160 patients diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis between January 2019 and December 2020 were accessed and analysed. The recorded variables included forms of pulmonary tuberculosis, age/gender distribution, co-morbidities, Acid-fast Bacillus (AFB) smear status, and radiological findings and distribution. Descriptive statistics are presented in frequency and percentage.

Results: Among the 160 cases of pulmonary tuberculosis, 30 (18.75%) cases were active primary tuberculosis, 105 (65.63%) cases were active post-primary tuberculosis, and 25 (15.62%) cases were inactive tuberculosis. Among the 30 cases of active primary tuberculosis, 14 (46.67%) cases had consolidation with air bronchogram, and 6 (20%) cases had consolidation without air bronchogram. Among the 105 cases of active post-primary tuberculosis, 65 (61.9%) cases had consolidation, 50 (47.62%) cases had cavities, and 56 (81.9%) cases had centrilobular nodules with a tree-in-bud appearance. Among the 25 cases of inactive tuberculosis, 18 (72%) cases had fibrosis with bronchiectasis, while 4 (16%) cases had fibrosis without bronchiectasis, and 3 (12%) cases had calcified granulomas.

Conclusion: The study conclusively demonstrates the diverse radiological manifestations of pulmonary tuberculosis in different patient demographics. It highlights a higher incidence of active post-primary tuberculosis, especially in patients above 45 years, with varying radiological findings such as consolidation, cavitation, and fibrosis.

Keywords

Bronchiectasis, Cavity, Consolidation, Fibrosis, Granuloma, Pleural effusion

India has the world’s highest number of tuberculosis cases reported, with an incidence of 26.9 lakh cases reported in the year 2019 (1). Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex is the causative agent of tuberculosis, with mycobacterium tuberculosis being the most common cause. Despite the discovery of the causal bacterium over a century ago and the availability of potent medications for treatment, tuberculosis remains a major public health problem even today (2).

Tuberculosis is an airborne disease spread via droplet transmission, involving alveolar macrophages being infected by the inhaled bacilli droplets in the terminal air spaces of the lungs (2). The virulence of the bacterium and the individual’s immunological response influence the likelihood of infection and clinical Tuberculosis (TB) (2). Specific populations are predisposed to the disease mainly due to poor living conditions, debility, and malnutrition.

Sputum analysis, which includes smear, culture, and nucleic acid amplification testing, is the primary method of detecting active tuberculosis. Radiology also plays a major role in the diagnosis and screening of tuberculosis. Radiologically, tuberculosis mainly manifests in two forms: active and latent forms (3). Based on the presence or absence of prior infection and acquired specific immunity, active pulmonary tuberculosis can be categorised into primary and post-primary tuberculosis (4). Primary tuberculosis develops shortly after infection and is most common in children and immunocompromised patients. It mainly manifests with lymphadenopathy, miliary disease, atelectasis, pulmonary consolidation, and pleural effusion (5). Post-primary tuberculosis develops after an extended period of latent infection and may be evident with cavities, consolidations, and centrilobular nodules (3). A cavity is the hallmark of post-primary tuberculosis and is suggestive of active disease. Cavities are most common in areas of consolidation and have thick irregular walls with or without air-fluid levels. This may progress or heal with fibrosis resulting in volume loss or tractional bronchiectasis (4),(5),(6). Previous tuberculosis, which is now inactive, manifests as fibronodular opacities in the apical and upper lung zones. Latent tuberculosis is an asymptomatic infection that can progress to post-primary tuberculosis. Chest radiographs can be used to detect asymptomatic active disease and to stratify risk. Clinical diagnosis, laboratory diagnosis, and chest radiography aid in the diagnosis and management of tuberculosis (3).

Existing studies on pulmonary Tuberculosis (TB) in India have extensively documented the high incidence rate, the microbiological characteristics of the mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, and the various modes of transmission and population predispositions to the disease (1). The clinical management and diagnostic protocols, including sputum analysis and radiological assessments, are well established and pivotal in the detection and treatment of TB.

However, there is a gap in the comprehensive analysis of radiological findings specific to the Indian demographic, which experiences a unique set of environmental and genetic factors that may influence the presentation of tuberculosis. Radiological findings can vary greatly from patient to patient, and understanding these variations within the context of a high-incidence population can provide crucial insights into disease patterns.

The study aimed to address these gaps by conducting a detailed analysis of the spectrum of radiological findings in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in India. The novelty of present study lies in its focused examination of radiological data within the Indian context, which has not been explored to this extent previously.

Material and Methods

A hospital-based retrospective descriptive study was conducted for a period of two years from January 2019 to December 2020 in the Department of Radiodiagnosis at Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. Data analysis and interpretation were performed over a period of one month. The proposal for the study was submitted to the Institution’s Ethics Committee, and approval was obtained (IEC Approval No. SMC/IEC/2018/12/037).

Inclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis by clinical or laboratory investigations and on anti-tuberculosis therapy, patients previously treated for tuberculosis and presenting with respiratory infections as a post-tuberculosis sequelae, were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients aged <15 years, patients with known malignancy, pregnant women, and patients with extrapulmonary tuberculosis were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

The data of 160 patients diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis and its sequelae who underwent chest radiography/CT chest were accessed from the manual and digital records in the Radiology Department and medical records division of the hospital and analysed. The recorded variables included forms of pulmonary tuberculosis, age/gender distribution, co-morbidities, AFB smear status, and radiological findings and distribution.

Statistical Analysis

All details regarding the patients were kept confidential. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0 for Microsoft windows. Descriptive statistics were presented in frequency tables and graphs.

Results

Among the 160 cases, 30 (18.75%) cases were active primary tuberculosis, 105 (65.63%) cases were active post-primary tuberculosis, and 25 (15.62%) cases were inactive or previous tuberculosis, as shown in (Table/Fig 1).

In a series of 160 cases, 97 (60.62%) cases were above the age of 45 years. Among the 160 cases, 119 (74.37%) cases were male, while 41 (25.63%) cases were female (Table/Fig 2).

Among the active primary tuberculosis cases (30 cases), 19 (63.33%) cases were unilateral, while 11 (36.67%) cases were bilateral. Out of the 252 cases of inactive pulmonary tuberculosis, 7 (28%) cases were unilateral, while 18 (72%) cases were bilateral (Table/Fig 3).

Among the 30 cases of active primary tuberculosis, 19 (63.33%) cases mainly involved the upper and middle zones of the lung in the chest radiography, while the remaining 11 (36.67%) cases affected the lower zone of the lung as shown in (Table/Fig 4).

Out of the 105 cases of active post-primary tuberculosis, 90 (85.71%) cases involved the upper and middle zones of the lung, while 15 (14.29%) cases involved the lower zone of the lung in chest radiography, as shown in (Table/Fig 5).

Among the 25 cases of inactive pulmonary tuberculosis, 60% (15 cases) involved the upper and middle zones of the lung, while 40% (10 cases) involved the lower zone of the lung in chest radiography, as shown in (Table/Fig 6).

Consolidation was the most common radiological finding. It was seen with air bronchogram in 14 patients with primary TB (46.67%), 47 patients with post-primary TB (44.76%), and three patients with inactive TB (12%), making a total of 64 patients (40%). Without air bronchogram, it was observed in 6 patients with primary TB (20%), 18 patients with post-primary TB (17.14%), and 1 patient with inactive TB (4%), making a total of 25 (15.63%).

Cavity with a fungal ball was seen in zero patients with primary TB, 4 patients with post-primary TB (3.81%), and 1 patient with inactive TB (4%), making a total of 5 (3.13%). Without a fungal ball, it was observed in 14 patients with primary TB (46.67%), 46 patients with post-primary TB (43.81%), and 5 patients with inactive TB (20%), making a total of 65 (40.63%) (Table/Fig 7).

Chest radiograph (Table/Fig 8) of a 65-year-old male patient shows right upper zone consolidation.

Chest radiograph [Table/Fig-9a,b] of a 54-year-old female shows a cavity in the right upper zone, marked by a solid yellow arrow.

High Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) chest (lung window) (Table/Fig 10)a,b of a 56-year-old female shows a thin-walled cavity and bronchiectatic changes in the left lung.

HRCT chest (lung window) (Table/Fig 11) of a 20-year-old female shows centrilobular nodules with a tree-in-bud appearance (solid yellow arrow).

Chest radiograph (Table/Fig 12) of a 68-year-old female shows a massive right pleural effusion.

Chest radiograph (Table/Fig 13)a and HRCT chest (mediastinal window) (Table/Fig 13)b of a 27-year-old female show hilar lymphadenopathy with calcifications (solid yellow arrow).

Chest radiograph (Table/Fig 14) of a 61-year-old male shows volume loss with fibro-cavity and minimal pleural effusion on the left side.

Chest radiograph (Table/Fig 15)a of a 38-year-old female shows multiple tiny nodular infiltrates noted diffusely distributed in bilateral lung fields. HRCT chest (lung window) (Table/Fig 15)b of the same patient shows multiple tiny nodular densities scattered diffusely and equally in bilateral lungs.

Chest radiograph (Table/Fig 16)a and HRCT chest (lung window) (Table/Fig 16)b of a 43-year-old male show calcified granulomas in bilateral upper and mid zones, marked by solid yellow arrows.

Chest radiograph (Table/Fig 17)a and HRCT chest (lung window) (Table/Fig 17)b-d of a 42-year-old female show cystic bronchiectasis changes with complete collapse of the left lung.

Chest radiograph (Table/Fig 18) of a 47-year-old patient shows volume loss of the left lung with mediastinal shift.

Chest radiograph (Table/Fig 19)a and HRCT chest (lung window) (Table/Fig 19)b-d of a 57-year-old male show dense consolidation with air bronchogram, minimal pleural effusion, and emphysematous changes in the visualised right hemithorax.

HRCT chest (lung window) (Table/Fig 20) of a 45-year-old male shows a broncho-pleural fistula of the right lung with right hydropneumothorax (solid black arrow).

About 4 (3.81%) cases of active post-primary tuberculosis (105 cases) and 1 (4%) case of inactive tuberculosis (25 cases) had a broncho-pleural fistula.

Chest radiograph (Table/Fig 21) of a 55-year-old male patient shows multiple thin-walled air-containing bullae (solid white arrow).

9 (8.57%) cases of active post-primary tuberculosis (105 cases) and 10 (40%) cases of inactive tuberculosis (25 cases) had bullae.

Discussion

Tuberculosis is a multi-system disease that clinically manifests as pulmonary tuberculosis and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. Pulmonary tuberculosis is the most common manifestation. Any bacteriologically confirmed or clinically diagnosed case of tuberculosis involving lung parenchyma or the tracheo-bronchial tree is known as pulmonary tuberculosis (7). Chest X-ray and CT chest play a vital role in making treatment decisions and thereby preventing the spread of the disease, which is a major health concern. The optimal method of tuberculosis screening is concurrent symptom inquiry and chest radiography/CT chest (8).

In present study, it was found that among 160 cases of pulmonary tuberculosis, 99 (61.87%) cases were male, and 61 (38.13%) cases were female. It is noted that pulmonary tuberculosis is more common in the male population than in the female population. Similar results were obtained in a study conducted by Devi RKJ and Singh KHM, where the incidence of pulmonary tuberculosis in males was 58%, and the incidence in females was 42% (9).

Active primary pulmonary tuberculosis is common in infancy and young adults who have not been previously exposed to mycobacterium Tuberculosis bacilli. It mainly manifests as consolidation, pleural effusion, mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and military opacities. The presence of a cavity in active primary pulmonary tuberculosis indicates progressive primary disease (10),(11).

Active post-primary pulmonary tuberculosis (TB reactivation or secondary TB) is a disease that affects adults who have previously been exposed to mycobacterium tuberculosis bacilli. It mainly manifests as consolidation, cavity, and centrilobular nodules with a tree-in-bud appearance. Cavity is the hallmark of active post-primary tuberculosis (11),(12). Consolidation is an area of increased lung attenuation with obscuration of pulmonary vessels (13).

In present study, out of 160 cases, 135 cases were classified as active primary (30 cases) and active post-primary tuberculosis (105 cases). Among the active tuberculosis cases (135 cases), lung consolidation was found in 85 (62.96%) cases, which is similar to the study conducted by Drusty K et al., where 68% of active pulmonary tuberculosis cases had lung consolidation (14). Among the 30 cases of active primary tuberculosis, 20 (66.7%) cases had lung consolidation. Similar results were found in the study conducted by Hua and Pu-Xuan L (15), where lung consolidations were found in 70% of primary tuberculosis cases.

A cavity is defined as a lucency with a diameter of more than 1cm, surrounded by a complete wall of 3 mm or more in thickness (13). Among the 135 cases of active pulmonary tuberculosis, 64 (47.41%) cases had lung cavitation on chest radiography, which is similar to the findings reported by Drusty K et al., (14), where 40.9% of active pulmonary tuberculosis cases had lung cavities. Cavitation is a common finding in post-primary tuberculosis, observed in 20%-45% of patients on chest radiographs (3), compared to 50 (47.62%) cases in present study.

Pleural effusion appears as an arcuate area of homogeneous density paralleling the chest wall on chest radiography, and it is a common complication in tuberculosis, mostly exudative and commonly unilateral (16). It is seen in approximately 25% of adult primary tuberculosis cases (17). In present study, among the 30 cases of active primary tuberculosis, 8 (26.67%) cases had pleural effusion on chest radiography.

Centrilobular nodules with a tree-in-bud appearance indicate endobronchial spread of tuberculosis, resulting from communication between active tuberculosis and the bronchial tree. These nodules appear as 2-4 mm ill-defined centrilobular nodules in a branching pattern, with linear thickened branching opacities around the terminal and respiratory bronchioles on CT chest (4). Among the cases of active pulmonary tuberculosis (135 cases), 98 (72.59%) cases had centrilobular nodules with a tree-in-bud appearance. Similar results were obtained in the study conducted by Drusty K et al., where 77% had centrilobular nodules with a tree-in-bud appearance on chest radiography and CT chest (14).

Miliary nodules present as small nodules with a diameter of 1-3mm, randomly distributed in both lungs on chest radiography and CT. Miliary disease can occur in primary or post-primary tuberculosis. It spreads through haematogenous seeding and can occur in 2-6% of cases of primary tuberculosis (18),(19). In present study, among the 30 cases of active primary tuberculosis, 3 (10%) cases had miliary nodules on chest radiography/CT.

Chest X-ray/CT findings of inactive tuberculosis include fibrosis, persistent nodal calcification (Ranke’s complex), and a tuberculoma (10),(11). HRCT findings in patients with post-tuberculosis suggestive of past infection include deranged bronchovascular structures, bronchiectasis, emphysema, and fibrotic bands (20). Bronchiectasis develops in 30%-60% of active post-primary TB cases and 71%-86% of inactive TB cases on HRCT (14).

In present study, 57 (54.29%) cases of active post-primary tuberculosis and 18 (72%) cases of inactive tuberculosis had bronchiectasis.

The strengths of present study lie in its substantial sample size and its focus on a demographic with a high incidence of pulmonary tuberculosis. A significant strength is the detailed analysis of radiological patterns, which are pivotal for timely intervention and could assist clinicians in the early identification of active TB, particularly in an endemic area like India.

For future studies, authors recommend a prospective design to corroborate these findings and explore the longitudinal outcomes associated with different radiological presentations. Long-term follow-up could provide insight into the prognostic significance of the radiological features identified. Additionally, expanding the research to include molecular and genetic studies could elucidate the psychophysiological correlations with radiological findings.

From a clinical relevance standpoint, the findings of present study could enable healthcare providers to make more informed decisions regarding TB treatment and management. It may also contribute to the development of region-specific diagnostic algorithms that consider the unique radiological presentations observed in Indian patients. This approach can potentially lead to earlier detection of active TB cases, better risk stratification for latent TB infections, and more effective monitoring of treatment response.

Limitation(s)

The retrospective design, while informative, limits the ability to establish causality. Additionally, there may be an inherent selection bias given the tertiary care setting, which might not be representative of the general population. Furthermore, the lack of correlation with microbiological data and patient outcomes is a significant gap that future research should address.

Conclusion

Tuberculosis is more common in males than females. Active primary tuberculosis is more common among younger age groups, while active post-primary and inactive tuberculosis are more common in the elderly. Consolidation, pleural effusion, and mediastinal lymphadenopathy are common radiological findings in active primary tuberculosis. Consolidation, cavity, and centrilobular nodules with a tree-in-bud appearance are common findings in active post-primary tuberculosis, while fibrosis, bronchiectasis, and calcified granuloma are common findings in the post-tuberculosis or inactive form of tuberculosis. Chest radiography/CT chest, in addition to clinical and laboratory investigations, can help in the prompt diagnosis and management of the disease. Future studies should aim to include a broader spectrum of patients and link radiological data with microbiological and clinical outcomes. It would also be beneficial to compare the trends observed in sampled south Indian cohort with those of other populations to assess the generalisability of these findings.

References

1.
India TB Report (2020). Accessed: March 20, 2022. https://tbcindia.gov.in/ WriteReadData/l892s/India%20TB%20Report%202020.pdf.
2.
Self-study modules on Tuberculosis. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Accessed on May 16, 2021. http://www.cdc.gov/tb/education/ssmodules/.
3.
Nachiappan AC, Rahbar K, Shi X, Guy ES, Mortani Barbosa EJ Jr, Shroff GS, et al. Pulmonary tuberculosis: Role of radiology in diagnosis and management. Radiographics. 2017;37(1):52-72. Doi: 10.1148/rg.2017160032.. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Leung AN. Pulmonary tuberculosis: The essentials. Radiology. 1999;210(2):307- 22. Doi: 10.1148/radiology.210.2.r99ja34307. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Lee KS, Song KS, Lim TH, Kim PN, Kim IY, Lee BH. Adult-onset pulmonary tuberculosis: Findings on chest radiographs and CT scans. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160(4):753-58. Doi: 10.2214/ajr.160.4.8456658. PMID: 8456658. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Im JG, Itoh H, Han MC. CT of pulmonary tuberculosis. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT, MRI. 1995;16(5):420-34. Doi: 10.1016/0887-2171(95)90029-2. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
World Health Organisation. Definitions and reporting framework for tuberculosis. (2013) (updated December 2014 and January 2020). Accessed: September 24, 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/79199.
8.
Al Ubaidi BA. The radiological diagnosis of pulmonary Tuberculosis (TB) in primary care. Journal of Family Medicine and Disease Prevention. 2018;4(1):073. Doi: org/10.23937/2469-5793/1510073. [crossref]
9.
Devi RKJ, Singh KHM. Computed tomography thorax- Role in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. J Evolution Med Dent Sci. 2020;9(07):422-27. Doi: 10.14260/jemds/2020/96. [crossref]
10.
Burrill J, Williams CJ, Bain G, Conder G, Hine AL, Misra RR. Tuberculosis: A radiologic review. Radiographics. 2007;27(5):255-73. Doi: 10.1148/rg.275065176. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Di Muzio B, O’Donnell C. Primary pulmonary tuberculosis. Reference article, Radiopaedia.org. (2021). Accessed: 31 Mar 2022. https://doi.org/10.53347/rID- 16034.
12.
Harisinghani MG, McLoud TC, Shepard JA, Ko JP, Shroff MM, Mueller PR. Tuberculosis from head to toe. Radiographics. 2000;20(2):449-70; quiz 528-9, 532. Doi: 10.1148/radiographics.20.2.g00mc12449. PMID: 10715343. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Gotway MB, Reddy GP, Webb WR, Elicker BM, Leung JW. High-resolution CT of the lung: Patterns of disease and differential diagnoses. Radiol Clin North Am. 2005;43(3):513-42, viii. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Majmudar DK, Rajput DK. Role of HRCT in diagnosing disease activity in pulmonary tuberculosis. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research. 2017;4(8):1724-27.
15.
Hua H, Pu-Xuan L. Paving-stone CT finding in a pulmonary tuberculosis patient. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2013;3(5):282-83. Doi: 10.21037/qims.2013.05.01.
16.
Atwal SS, Puranik S, Madhav RK, Ksv A, Sharma BB, Garga UC. High resolution computed tomography lung spectrum in symptomatic adult HIV-positive patients in south-east Asian nation. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(6):RC12-16. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Woodring JH, Vandiviere HM, Fried AM, Dillon ML, Williams TD, Melvin IG. Update: the radiographic features of pulmonary tuberculosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;146(3):497-506. Doi:10.2214/ajr.146.3.497 [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Maartens G, Willcox PA, Benatar SR. Miliary tuberculosis: Rapid diagnosis, hematologic abnormalities, and outcome in 109 treated adults. Am J Med. 1990;89(2):291-96. Doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90312-J. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Kim JH, Langston AA, Gallis HA. Miliary tuberculosis: Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and outcome. Rev Infect Dis. 1990;12(4):583-90. Doi: 10.1093/clinids/12.4.583. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Lee KS, Im JG. CT in adults with tuberculosis of the chest: Characteristic findings and role in management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164(6):1361-67. Doi: 10.2214/ ajr.164.6.1361.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/67334.19037

Date of Submission: Sep 02, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Nov 01, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Dec 04, 2023
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 07, 2023
• Manual Googling: Nov 22, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Dec 02, 2023 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com