Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 201237

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : March | Volume : 18 | Issue : 3 | Page : ZC07 - ZC11 Full Version

Comparative Assessment of Flexural Strength in Heat-cured Polymethyl Methacrylate Resin Reinforced with Silver Nanoparticles, Siwak, and Fluconazole: An In-vitro Study


Published: March 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/66917.19110
Rupali Choure, Naveen S Yadav, Kirti Somkuwar, Vrinda Saxena, Riddhi Tiwari, Ramnik Bhatia

1. Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, People’s Dental Academy, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Prosthodontics, People’s Dental Academy, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. 3. Reader, Department of Prosthodontics, People’s Dental Academy, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. 4. Professor and Head, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Government Dental College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India. 5. Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, People’s Dental Academy, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. 6. Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, People’s Dental Academy, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Naveen S Yadav,
Professor and Head, Department of Prosthodontics, People’s Dental Academy, Bhanpur, Bhopal-462037, Madhya Pradesh, India.
E-mail: naveensyadav@gmail.com

Abstract



Introduction: For crafting complete dentures, Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) has long been the material of choice. Various reinforcements are being used to enhance the properties of PMMA and minimise denture fracture.

Aim: The present in-vitro study compared the flexural strength of PMMA resin samples reinforced with Silver Nanoparticles (Ag NP), siwak, and fluconazole.

Materials and Methods: The present in-vitro experiment was conducted from July to August 2017 at the Prosthodontics Department of a Dental College with technical support from the Centre for Scientific Research and Development (CSRD), affiliated with People’s University in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. Flexural testing was conducted at the Central Institute of Plastic Engineering and Technology (CIPET), Bhopal. A total of 120 acrylic resin samples, each measuring 65 mm in length, 10 mm in width, and 2.5 mm in thickness, were fabricated in accordance with American Dental Association (ADA) Specification No. 12. These specimens were categorised into four distinct groups. The first group consisted of only PMMA resin (Group A), while the remaining three groups comprised PMMA resin enhanced with AgNP (Group B), Siwak (Group C), and Fluconazole (Group D), respectively, with each group containing 30 samples. Subsequently, these specimens underwent a flexural strength assessment through a 3-point flexural test. The statistical analysis to assess and compare the mean flexural strength of the samples was conducted. The present analysis was performed first by applying an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test, followed by pairwise comparisons with Tukey’s Post-hoc test. A p-value less than 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance.

Results: The mean flexural strength (±Standard Deviation) in N/mm2 for PMMA; PMMA+AgNP; PMMA+Siwak and PMMA+ Fluconazole was 82.33±5.18; 80.55±5.67; 71.50±10.15; and 74.03±10.84, respectively. The mean flexural strengths of the PMMA and PMMA+AgNP groups were similar (p=0.842). However, the flexural strength of the Siwak+PMMA and Fluconazole+PMMA groups was significantly less than that of the other two groups.

Conclusion: The flexural strength of PMMA is unaffected by the inclusion of AgNP at a concentration of 1%, and its incorporation would allow the benefit from its antibacterial qualities. It is not advised to add fluconazole or siwak because doing so reduces the flexural strength.

Keywords

3-Point flexural test, Antibacterial properties, Dental materials, Mechanical properties

The world is undergoing a demographic transition in which the elderly population is increasing. This rise in the ageing population poses challenges for dental care, particularly in catering to edentulous patients. Dental implants are often considered the preferred treatment choice for individuals with complete or partial tooth loss. However, in practice, individuals often choose conventional complete dentures. This decision is influenced by various factors, including the patient’s financial limitations, physical constraints, and underlying biological conditions (1),(2). Therefore, considering the need for the same, advancing research in dental materials has amplified the scope for prosthetic and restorative applications. Due to its numerous advantages, PMMA has long been the material of choice for crafting complete dentures. These include its cost-effectiveness, lightweight nature, ease of processing, and quick repairability (1),(3). An ideal denture base material should possess enhanced aesthetics while exhibiting superior properties, including a higher modulus of elasticity, strength (flexural and impact), and the capacity to be easily repaired or adjusted for contour changes. Additionally, dimensional stability is a crucial characteristic to be sought in such a material (1),(4),(5).

Denture fracture is a known problem. Improvement in flexural and impact strength of PMMA to prevent fracture has been reported in the literature. Researchers have endeavoured to enhance the properties of PMMA by modifying its composition or reinforcing using more robust materials. These approaches involve incorporating copolymers to alter the design and reinforcing dentures with aramid, carbon graphite, polyethylene, and glass fibers. Additionally, there has been exploration into enhancing PMMA by reinforcing it using metallic fillers and nanoparticles, including materials such as silica and titania nanoparticles (1),(6),(7),(8),(9),(10),(11),(12),(13). Silver, known for its benign nature towards oral mucosa and potent antimicrobial properties against Candida albicans, has been extensively explored as a filler material in dental research. Various studies have investigated the mechanical properties of PMMA when reinforced with AgNP at different concentrations. The outcomes of these studies (14),(15),(16),(17),(18),(19),(20),(21) have shown a range of effects on the flexural strength of PMMA, with some indicating a decrease, others an increase, and several showing no significant change. Notably, the specific impact of adding 1% AgNP has not been thoroughly investigated. Alongside silver, Fluconazole, a well-known antifungal agent, and Siwak, recognised for its antimicrobial properties, have also garnered interest (22),(23),(24),(25).

However, there remains a gap in understanding how the integration of these substances into denture materials influences their mechanical integrity, particularly in terms of flexural strength. The present study aimed to bridge this gap by assessing whether the antimicrobial benefits of these agents can be incorporated into denture materials without adversely affecting their essential mechanical properties. The objective of present study was to compare and evaluate the flexural strength of pure heat-cured PMMA resin when reinforced with AgNP, Siwak, and Fluconazole.

Material and Methods

This in-vitro experiment was conducted from July to August 2017 at the Prosthodontics Department of a Dental College with technical support from the Centre for Scientific Research and Development (CSRD), affiliated with People’s University in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. Flexural testing was conducted at the Central Institute of Plastic Engineering and Technology (CIPET), Bhopal. The study protocol was approved by the Research Advisory Committee of PDA, Bhopal (Approval number: ICC/Ref. No./2015/3 Date 17 Dec 2015).

Sample size calculation: G-Power software was used to calculate the sample size (26). The required sample size to test whether mean flexural strength is different among four groups, assuming a medium effect size, type-I error of 5%, and power of 80%, was 30 samples in each group, totaling 120 samples. Therefore, it was decided to fabricate 120 specimens and divide them into four groups of 30 specimens each.

Study Procedure

Specimen fabrication: In accordance with ADA Specification No. 12, 120 acrylic resin samples were fabricated, each measuring 65 mm in length, 10 mm in width, and 2.5 mm in thickness (27), following the recommended procedure (Table/Fig 1)a,b. (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3) show the details of the materials and equipment used for this study.

To facilitate the easy removal of the wax specimens, petroleum jelly was applied as a lubricant to the mould. The process involved joining the lower and middle plates, and then pouring molten wax into the mould. Subsequently, the upper plate was positioned, and the entire assembly was subjected to pressure using a bench press to eliminate any excess wax. After lifting the upper plate, a sharp BP knife was utilised to remove excess wax. After detaching it from the platform, gentle pressure on the open top was applied to extract the solidified wax from the mould. All resulting specimens exhibited uniformity and consistency in all dimensions. Any specimens that appeared damaged, broken, or distorted were excluded from the analysis. The prepared wax patterns were thoroughly washed in a soap solution and then made ready for flasking.

Processing of Acrylic Resin Specimens (28),(29):

Investing of the wax patterns: The dental stone was used to invest the wax patterns in standard brass flasks. Each flask accommodated five patterns. A separating medium was used after the dental stone had been set, and a second pour was performed. After that, a clamp was used to close and firmly tighten the flask. The setting time for each flask pour was about an hour.

Dewaxing of the patterns: Following the placement of the flask assembly in the dewaxing unit for 7-8 minutes, the segments of the flask were segregated and washed completely with hot water to eliminate any remaining wax. Subsequently, the moulds were cleaned by washing them with soapy water and then left to air dry. While the moulds were still warm, a thin, even layer of a separating medium (a substitute for tin foil) was meticulously applied to the plaster surfaces on flask parts to ensure uniformity.

Mixing and packing of control group (Group A) specimens: After cooling, the denture base resin (specifically, Trevalon HI, Dentsply India Private Limited, Batch No: TH70102), available in both powder and liquid (monomer) forms, was meticulously mixed in a porcelain jar, following the manufacturer’s guidelines. The mixture was carefully brought to the dough stage, kneaded, and then inserted into the mould. Subsequently, a trial closure was performed using a hydro press applying a force of 40,000 N (8). The flask was secured, and a controlled, low-pressure environment was maintained for 30 minutes. This allowed for effective penetration of the monomer into the polymer, ensuring consistent material flow and removing excess material. A total of 30 specimens were prepared using this method.

Mixing and packing of experimental group (Group-B): Silver nanoparticles+Polymethacrylate Denture Base Resin (14) Nano Labs Pvt., Ltd., supplied commercially available AgNP in powder form, and their properties are detailed in (Table/Fig 2). To ensure purity, a laboratory certification was obtained. For the experiment, 2.1 grams of AgNP, constituting 1% of the weight, were added to the liquid monomer. Using a magnetic stirrer, the liquid monomer was continuously stirred for approximately 15-20 minutes. This process adhered to the manufacturer’s recommended powder-liquid ratio of 21 grams to 10 mL. Once the mixture had reached the dough stage, it was carefully kneaded and then placed into the mould.

To complete the process, a trial closure was performed using a hydro press with a pressure of 40,000 N (8). Subsequently, the flask was securely clamped, and controlled low pressure was maintained for 30 minutes. This step was essential to ensure effective penetration of the monomer into the polymer, guaranteeing uniform material distribution and removing any excess material. In total, 30 specimens were crafted using this methodology.

Group-C: Siwak (Salvadora persica)+Polymethacrylate Denture Base Resin (24) Siwak sticks were ordered from an e-commerce platform and kept in a desiccator for three weeks to dry. Then, their outer coverings were peeled, and the remaining parts were crushed and put in an electric grinder to prepare a powder form, which was then mixed with monomer by 1% weight, i.e., 2.1 gm of Siwak powder. The mixture was then stirred with a magnetic stirrer. Further procedures were carried out similarly to those in Groups A and B.

Group-D: Fluconazole+Polymethacrylate Denture Base Resin (22) Fluconazole tablets (Zocon 150 mg IP, Manufacturer- FDC) were crushed, and a powder form was prepared. 1% of the weight, i.e., 2.1 gm, was mixed with the monomer liquid and stirred with a magnetic stirrer. The procedure followed that of Groups A, B, and C. The final closure was executed at a pressure of 2750 psi. Subsequently, the flask was subjected to bench curing for one hour. Following this, the flasks were immersed in acrylic, and the curing process took place at 74°C for two hours, followed by an additional hour at 100°C. The flasks were removed and allowed to bench cool overnight. Specimens were retrieved after complete cooling and finished and polished with silicon carbide paper. Mechanical testing was conducted using a Universal Testing machine, which was accessible in the laboratory of CIPET Bhopal.

Flexural strength testing: Total 30 specimens from each group underwent a thorough assessment of their flexural strength via a 3-point flexural test. These samples were meticulously positioned in a calibrated Instron Universal Testing Machine, supplied by Instron Corp., Canton, MA. This testing apparatus included a loading wedge and adjustable supporting wedges set 48 mm apart.

During the test, each specimen was precisely centered on the equipment, ensuring that the loading wedge engaged the center of the upper surface of the sample (as depicted in (Table/Fig 1)c). The loading wedge advanced at a controlled cross-head speed of 2 mm per minute. The specimens were subjected to loading until they fractured, at which point the peak load (fracture load) was accurately recorded using a chart recorder.

The flexural strength (S) of each specimen was calculated using the formula: S=3PL/2bd2, where S represents the flexural strength in N/mm2, P is the load at fracture, L is the distance between the jig supports, b represents the specimen width, and d signifies the specimen thickness (30).

Statistical Analysis

All data readings were entered into an Excel spreadsheet and subsequently analysed using R version 4.2.2. For exploratory data analysis, descriptive statistics were computed, encompassing measures of central tendency such as the mean and median, and measures of spread such as standard deviation or interquartile range.

Then, the mean flexural strength across the four groups was compared by applying the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test, which informed if there was any difference in the distribution of flexural strength. Pairwise comparisons were done using Tukey’s Post-hoc test to identify which pairs differed significantly. To ascertain statistical significance in all analyses, a significance level of p<0.05 was adopted.

Results

The flexural strength values and corresponding descriptive statistics for each experimental group are presented in (Table/Fig 4)a,(Table/Fig 4)b. In Group A, which consisted of specimens without reinforcement, the mean flexural strength was determined to be 82.33 N/mm2, with a standard deviation of 5.18 N/mm2. For the PMMA specimens with reinforcement, the mean flexural strength (±Standard Deviation) of Ag NP, Siwak, and Fluconazole was 80.55±5.67 N/mm2, 71.50±10.15 N/mm2, and 74.03±10.84 N/mm2, respectively. The strength of the PMMA+Siwak and PMMA+Fluconazole groups was similar (p=0.644). This means that Siwak and Fluconazole had a similar impact in terms of material strength (Table/Fig 4)c.

The distribution of flexural strength was significantly different across the four groups (p<0.001). Furthermore, Tukey’s test was applied for pairwise comparisons. (Table/Fig 5) depicts flexural strength across the four groups through a Box-Violin-Jitter plot. The average flexural strength of the PMMA and the PMMA+AgNP groups was comparable (p=0.842, Not Significant). However, the average flexural strength of the PMMA+Siwak and PMMA+Fluconazole group was lower than only the PMMA group (p<0.001, Highly Significant). This suggests that the addition of Siwak or Fluconazole had a noticeable negative impact on the material’s strength. Also, the mean flexural strength of the PMMA+Siwak and PMMA+Fluconazole group was lower than the PMMA+AgNP group (p<0.001 and p=0.016, respectively; Highly Significant). This shows that AgNP were more effective at maintaining strength compared to Siwak and Fluconazole.

Discussion

The present in-vitro study reports that flexural strength remains similar even after reinforcement with AgNPs. However, flexural strength declines with the reinforcement of Siwak and Fluconazole. Various reinforcements are essential to improve the mechanical, physical, and other essential characteristics of PMMA dentures while promoting biocompatibility and reducing failure rates. Notably, a significant portion of clinical failures associated with PMMA dentures can be attributed to fractures, which may result from either fatigue or impact forces (22),(23). PMMA lacks some mechanical properties and is thus prone to fractures, and its reinforcement with suitable polymers would reduce the likelihood of fractures (6),(31),(32).

Numerous studies have tested mechanical properties after PMMA reinforcement by adding AgNP in different concentrations (14),(15),(16),(17),(18),(19),(20),(21). Reduced flexural strength of PMMA resin was reported with AgNP concentrations of 0.05% (17), 0.2% (18), and 2% (18), and an increase was reported at 0.5% (16). In contrast, no change was reported at AgNP concentrations of 0.8% and 1.6% (14). A meta-analysis investigating the impact of AgNP addition on flexural strength has concluded that the flexural strength tends to either decrease or show no significant improvement when AgNPs are incorporated (33). In present study, no decrease in flexural strength after adding 1% AgNP was observed. This variation of results in a change in flexural strength was attributed to different types of resin, quantity, concentration, and brands of resins, and polar interactions formed between C=O (16),(17). Since flexural strength is not negatively affected with 1% AgNP, its use in reinforcement would help gain benefits of the antibacterial properties of silver. Modern dentistry has a prominent trend in using medication extracted from natural plants as biocompatible agents (34). As a growing interest in medicinal plants for therapeutic application, Siwak was used as a filler in denture base resin material.

Abdul-Rahman Khalaf H conducted a study to assess the impact of incorporating Siwak powder, with an average particle size of 75 micrometers, into PMMA. This investigation involved the use of three distinct weight-based concentrations of Siwak powder to determine its effects on various mechanical properties of PMMA. Their investigation demonstrated that incorporating Siwak powder at 3% and 5% by weight ratios into the heat-polymerising acrylic resin did not adversely impact its physical and mechanical properties. However, when 7% Siwak powder by weight was introduced into the heat-polymerising acrylic resin, it had an adverse effect on most of the tested mechanical properties, except for the transverse test (24). Recently, Haitham R and Mohammed R reported the effect on the flexural strength of PMMA reinforced with 1%, 2%, 3%, and 4% Siwak particles (25). They reported similar flexural strength with 1% Siwak particles but a marked increase with 4% concentration; however, their sample size for each group was smaller (n=4 per group).

In the current study, adding 1% Siwak to the PMMA significantly affected its flexural strength. Siwak contains silica as its main abrasive ingredient, along with sodium bicarbonate (35). The presence of Siwak particles may influence the bonding of polymer chains due to potential variations in surface tension caused by their entry into the polymer chains. Although the results of this study differ from the previous one, it is important to note that Siwak exhibits antibacterial activity against numerous oral pathogenic bacteria (36).

Antimicrobial agents in dental materials are also a trend in dentistry, along with the incorporation of bioactive compounds (37). In the present study, Fluconazole was the drug of choice as a filler material for its antifungal activity against oral microorganisms, including candida. The treatment of denture stomatitis caused by fungal infection is always a challenge for prosthodontists. Soft liners and acrylic resin incorporated with antifungal agents were explored, and their benefits, such as the continued presence of drugs at the site of action and feasibility for use, are suggested (38). It was found that it has better effects, such as the continued presence of drugs at the site of action.

Al-Haddad A et al., investigated the influence on the fracture toughness of PMMA after adding bioactive compounds such as Fluconazole and Chlorhexidine. They discovered that adding 4.5% by mass of Fluconazole did not change the fracture toughness of the PMMA (23). On the other hand, in another study by Yadav NS et al., it was found that adding 10% by mass of Fluconazole resulted in lower values of the denture base resin’s flexural strength (22).

In present study, it has been found that the incorporation of 1% Fluconazole led to a decrease in the flexural strength compared to the control group specimens. These differences were statistically significant and had an impact on the physical properties of the denture.

The clinical implications of present study indicate that the addition of AgNP has no detrimental impact on the flexural strength of denture base resins, irrespective of the percentage of nanosilver added. However, it has been observed that the addition of Siwak and Fluconazole negatively affects the acrylic resin, potentially compromising the strength and durability of complete dentures.

Limitation(s)

The in-vitro nature of the study, although precise for controlled experimentation, may not fully emulate the complex oral environment, where variables such as saliva, temperature, and mechanical forces play a significant role. The study’s focus on immediate flexural strength does not encompass the long-term durability and wear resistance of the PMMA composites, which are essential for their practical application in dentistry. Furthermore, the investigation is restricted to specific additives, limiting the exploration of a broader range of materials that could potentially enhance PMMA’s properties. Finally, the absence of clinical correlation limits the direct applicability of the findings to patient care, underscoring the need for future research that includes clinical evaluations to substantiate the laboratory results.

Conclusion

The flexural strength of PMMA is unaffected by the inclusion of AgNP at a concentration of 1%, and its incorporation would allow for the benefit from its antibacterial qualities. It is not advised to add fluconazole or Siwak because doing so reduces the flexural strength.

References

1.
Gad MM, Fouda SM, Al-Harbi FA, Näpänkangas R, Raustia A. PMMA denture base material enhancement: A review of fiber, filler, and nanofiller addition. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:3801-12. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Carlsson GE, Omar R. The future of complete dentures in oral rehabilitation. A critical review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(2):143-56. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Alla RK, Swamy R, Vyas R, Konakanchi A. Conventional and Contemporary polymers for the fabrication of denture prosthesis: Part I- Overview, composition and properties. IJADS. 2015;1(4):82-89.
4.
Meng TR, Latta MA. Physical properties of four acrylic denture base resisns. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2005;6(4):93-100. [crossref]
5.
Diwan R. Materials prescribed in the management of edentulous patients. In: Zarb GA, Hobkirk J, Eckert S, Jacob R, editors. Prosthodontic Treatment for Edentulous Patients - E-Book: Complete Dentures and Implant-Supported Prostheses. 12th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013. Pp. 190-207.
6.
Rodford R. The development of high impact strength denture-base materials. J Dent. 1986;14(5):214-17. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Ladizesky NH, Cheng YY, Chow TW, Ward IM. Acrylic resin reinforced with chopped high performance polyethylene fiber--properties and denture construction. Dent Mater Off Publ Acad Dent Mater. 1993;9(2):128-35. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
John J, Gangadhar SA, Shah I. Flexural strength of heat-polymerised polymethyl methacrylate denture resin reinforced with glass, aramid, or nylon fibers. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86(4):424-27. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Jagger DC, Harrison A, Jandt KD. The reinforcement of dentures. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26(3):185-94.[crossref][PubMed]
10.
Jagger DC, Jagger RG, Allen SM, Harrison A. An investigation into the transverse and impact strength of “high strength” denture base acrylic resins. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29(3):263-67. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Shirkavand S, Moslehifard E. Effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on tensile strength of dental acrylic resins. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2014;8(4):197-203.
12.
Elshereksi NW, Ghazali MJ, Muchtar A, Azhari CH. Perspectives for Titanium- derived fillers usage on denture base composite construction: A review article [Internet]. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2014.746252. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/amse/2014/746252/. [crossref]
13.
Vallittu PK. Acrylic resin-fiber composite--Part II: The effect of polymerisation shrinkage of polymethyl methacrylate applied to fiber roving on transverse strength. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71(6):613-17. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Köroğlu A, Sahin O, Kürkçüoğlu I, Dede Dö, Özdemir T, Hazer B. Silver nanoparticle incorporation effect on mechanical and thermal properties of denture base acrylic resins. J Appl Oral Sci. 2016;24(6):590-96. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Jadhav RD, Bhide SV, Prasad BLV, Shimpi J. Applications of silver nanoparticles in prosthodontics: An overview. Eur J Prosthodont. 2016;4(3):45. [crossref]
16.
Kassaee MZ, Akhavan A, Sheikh N, Sodagar A. Antibacterial effects of a new dental acrylic resin containing silver nanoparticles. J Appl Polym Sci. 2008;110(3):1699-703. [crossref]
17.
Sodagar A, Kassaee MZ, Akhavan A, Javadi N, Arab S, Kharazifard MJ. Effect of silver nano particles on flexural strength of acrylic resins. J Prosthodont Res. 2012;56(2):120-24. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Chladek G, Kasperski J, Barszczewska-Rybarek I, Z · mudzki J. Sorption, solubility, bond strength and hardness of denture soft lining incorporated with silver nanoparticles. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;14(1):563-74. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Mahross HZ, Baroudi K. Effect of silver nanoparticles incorporation on viscoelastic properties of acrylic resin denture base material. Eur J Dent. 2015;9(2):207-12. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Noronha VT, Paula AJ, Durán G, Galembeck A, Cogo-Müller K, Franz-Montan M, et al. Silver nanoparticles in dentistry. Dent Mater. 2017;33(10):1110-26. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Pai E, Nayak A, Hallikerimath RB, Ruttonji Z, Astagi P, Pokale S. Comparison of titanium dioxide nanoparticles and silver nanoparticles for flexural strength once incorporated in heat-cure acrylic denture base resin: An in vitro Study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2023;23(2):127-34. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Yadav NS, Saraf S, Mishra SK, Hazari P. Effects of fluconazole, chlorhexidine gluconate, and silver-zinc zeolite on flexural strength of heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate resin. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015;6(2):340-42. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Al-Haddad A, Vahid Roudsari R, Satterthwaite JD. Fracture toughness of heat cured denture base acrylic resin modified with Chlorhexidine and Fluconazole as bioactive compounds. J Dent. 2014;42(2):180-84. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Abdul-Rahman Khalaf H. Effect of Siwak on certain mechanical properties of acrylic resin. J Oral Dent Res. 2013;1:40-45. [crossref]
25.
Haitham R, Mohammed R. Characteristics polymer for denture base modified by siwak particles. Solid State Technol. 2020;63:12386-400.
26.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175-91. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Revised American Dental Association Specification No. 12 for denture base polymers. J Am Dent Assoc. 1975;90(2):451-58. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Anusavice KJ. Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials - eBook. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2003. Pp. 2384.
29.
Morrow RM, Rudd KD, Rhoads JE. Dental Laboratory Procedures. Mosby; 1986. book.
30.
Callister WD. Materials science and engineering [Internet]. Wiley; 2003. 862 p. Available from: http://archive.org/details/materialsscience00call_0.
31.
Shenoy D, Uma KC, Mathew KM, Reddy PS, Jain AR, Anjaneyulu K. Evaluation of impact and flexural strength of conventional heat cure polymethyl methacrylate resin and high impact. Biol Med [Internet]. 2017;9(2). Available from: https:// www.omicsonline.org/open-access/evaluation-of-impact-and-flexural-strength-of-conventional-heat-cure-polymethyl-methacrylate-resin-and-high-impact- 0974-8369-1000389.php?aid=86830. [crossref]
32.
Gupta A, Tewari RK. Evaluation and comparison of transverse and impact strength of different high strength denture base resins. Indian J Dent Res. 2016;27(1):61. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Bangera MK, Kotian R, Madhyastha P. Effects of silver nanoparticle-based antimicrobial formulations on the properties of denture polymer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;129(2):310-21. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Ige OO, Umoru LE, Aribo S. Natural Products: A minefield of biomaterials [Internet]. International Scholarly Research Notices. 2012. Available from: https:// www.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2012/983062/. [crossref]
35.
Al lafi T, Ababneh H. The effect of the extract of the miswak (chewing sticks) used in Jordan and the Middle East on oral bacteria. Int Dent J. 1995;45(3):218-22.
36.
Almas K. The antimicrobial effects of extracts of Azadirachta indica (Neem) and Salvadora persica (Arak) chewing sticks. Indian J Dent Res Off Publ Indian Soc Dent Res. 1999;10(1):23-26.
37.
Imazato S. Bio-active restorative materials with antibacterial effects: New dimension of innovation in restorative dentistry. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(1):11-19. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Salim N, Moore C, Silikas N, Satterthwaite JD, Rautemaa R. Fungicidal amounts of antifungals are released from impregnated denture lining material for up to 28 days. J Dent. 2012;40(6):506-12.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/66917.19110

Date of Submission: Aug 07, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Nov 09, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Dec 23, 2023
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 09, 2023
• Manual Googling: Nov 23, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Dec 21, 2023 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com