Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 79835

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : March | Volume : 18 | Issue : 3 | Page : SC13 - SC18 Full Version

Estimation of Microalbuminuria in Children with Beta Thalassaemia Major: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: March 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/64161.19211
YB Arun, G Aruna, GR Rajashekaramurthy, KS Sanjay

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 2. Associate Professor and Head, Department of Biochemistry, Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 3. Professor and Unit Head, Department of Paediatrics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 4. Director, Professor and Unit Head, Department of Paediatrics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. G Aruna,
South Hospital Complex, Dharamaram College Post, Near NIMHANS, Bengaluru-560029, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: agowdra@yahoo.com

Abstract

Introduction: Improvement in the standard of care of Thalassaemia by regular blood transfusion increases life expectancy. Multiple transfusions with concurrent iron overload and chronic anaemia, leading to tissue-level hypoxemia, cause significant renal dysfunction. Microalbuminuria is a sensitive marker of glomerular damage, and studies in thalassemic children have demonstrated variable prevalence rates of microalbuminuria.

Aim: To study the prevalence of microalbuminuria and its association with clinical and laboratory parameters in children with Beta Thalassaemia Major (BTM).

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2018 to June 2019 at Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bangaluru, Karnataka, India. A total of 155 children with Beta Thalassaemia Major (BTM) aged 2-18 years, attending the Thalassaemia Day Care Centre, were included in the study. Their demographic details such as age, gender, clinical parameters like frequency of transfusions, type of chelation therapy, height, weight, Body Mass Index (BMI), organomegaly, and laboratory parameters like serum creatinine, ferritin, pretransfusion Hb%, and Urinary Microalbumin Creatinine Ratio (UMCR) were studied as per a predesigned proforma. The association between microalbuminuria with clinical and laboratory parameters was evaluated using the independent sample T-test or Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square/Fischer’s-exact test.

Results: A total of 155 children with BTM were studied. In the present study, out of a total of 155 patients, microalbuminuria was found in 66 (42.6%). A significant increase in the prevalence of microalbuminuria was observed as the age advanced, as the frequency of blood transfusions increased, with low pretranfusion haemoglobin (g%), and with elevated serum ferritin.

Conclusion: In the present study, the prevalence of microalbuminuria was found to be 42.6%. Screening for microalbuminuria is recommended in all children with beta thalassaemia major for the early detection of renal dysfunction, prevention of disease progression, and improvement in the quality of their lives.

Keywords

Blood transfusion, Early biomarker, Haemoglobin, Renal dysfunction, Transfusion-dependent thalassaemia

The Beta Thalassaemia Major (BTM) is an autosomal recessively inherited blood disorder caused by HBB gene mutations, resulting in reduced or absent synthesis of specific globin chains and concurrent accumulation of other unpaired globin chains, leading to ineffective erythropoiesis with haemolysis (1). In 1925, Cooley TB and Lee P described Italian children with growth retardation, hepatosplenomegaly, and severe anaemia as Cooley’s anaemia, later known as Thalassaemia (2).

Conventionally, Thalassaemia is treated with transfusions of packed Red Blood Cells (RBC) from a healthy blood donor at regular intervals and chelation therapy to prevent the consequences of anaemia and iron overload, respectively. Improvement in the standard of care by regular blood transfusion and chelation therapy in a day-care centre has increased the life expectancy in children with thalassaemia. Multiple transfusions with concurrent iron overload, chronic anaemia with hypoxemia at the tissue level, and chelator toxicity cause significant renal dysfunction (3). Urine analysis in clinically asymptomatic children with thalassaemia showed increased urinary excretion of microalbumin, N-acetyl beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), calcium, phosphorus, etc., suggesting incipient renal tubulopathy (4). Microalbuminuria is a sensitive marker of glomerular damage, and studies in children with thalassaemia have demonstrated variable prevalence rates of microalbuminuria (3),(4),(5),(6). Assessment of urinary microalbumin is a non invasive, economical test for the identification of renal dysfunction. Serial monitoring of microalbuminuria helps diagnose an evolving renal pathology (3),(5),(6).

Bakr A et al., in their review, found that the prevalence of renal dysfunction in BTM has increased due to better management by regular blood transfusion and chelation therapy (7). Doddamani P et al., suggested that Urinary Microalbumin Creatinine Ratio (UCMR) should be included in the routine follow-up of these patients (3). Bekhit OE et al., in their study, found that glomerular and tubular dysfunction exist in children with BTM. Urinary NAG excretion can be a reliable index of tubular toxicity and a possible predictor of proteinuria, which can be recommended for the evaluation of renal dysfunction in these patients (4). In a study by Hameed EA et al., it was found that glomerular and tubular dysfunction is confirmed in patients with BTM, which could be attributed to oxidative stress and Deferoxamine (DFO) therapy (8). Yassin N et al., found that microalbuminuria was correlated with age and recommended inclusion of microalbuminuria in the routine follow-up of patients with BTM (9). Datta V et al., in their study, found that the mean serum creatinine levels did not show a significant difference; however, microalbuminuria would help in the early detection of patients with renal dysfunction and prompt initiation of therapy (10).

Studies have been conducted on renal dysfunction in children with BTM (3),(4),(8),(9),(10) and found variable results. Hence, the present study was undertaken to estimate the prevalence of renal dysfunction using microalbuminuria as an early marker of renal injury in children with BTM and to evaluate its association with clinical and laboratory parameters.

Material and Methods

The present cross-sectional study was conducted over one and a half years from January 2018 to June 2019 at Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. The procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institution and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, which was revised in 2000. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee at a meeting held on 23.11.2017 (vide IEC No: IGICH/ACA/EC/ 07/2017-18).

Inclusion criteria: All 155 BTM children between the age group of 2-18 years, registered under the Thalassaemia Day Care Centre for blood transfusion at Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India, within the study duration, who were willing to give written informed assent and whose caregivers were willing to give written informed consent were included in the study.

The diagnosis of BTM was based on the standard criteria, including transfusion-dependent anaemia, massive splenomegaly, growth retardation, bone malformations, and peculiar facies in untreated individuals, like bossing of the skull, overgrowth of the maxillary region, with the gradual appearance of a Mongoloid face (4). Examination of the peripheral blood smear preparation in such subjects revealed severe microcytic hypochromic anaemia, marked anisocytosis, and fragmented nucleated RBCs. Variant haemoglobin analysis by high-pressure liquid chromatography showed predominantly foetal haemoglobin (HbF >50% and HbA2 <4%) (4).

Exclusion criteria: Patients with other haemoglobinopathies, such as sickle cell anaemia, thalassaemia intermedia, thalassaemia minor, sickle-beta thalassaemia, any other associated haemolytic disorder (e.g., glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency), those with documented acute or chronic infection, including those with urinary tract infection at the time of sampling, patients on diuretic therapy, antiepileptic drugs, and those with primary renal disease and diabetes mellitus, were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Data collection: A predesigned proforma was used to record the relevant clinical details like age, gender, frequency of transfusions, and type of chelation therapy. Anthropometric measurements like height, weight, and BMI were recorded according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) and Indian Academy of Paediatrics (IAP) growth charts, depending on the age of the children (11),(12). Detailed examination findings were recorded, including organomegaly. A random midstream urine sample (10 mL) was collected from all the children in a sterile container without preservative and assayed for urinary microalbumin and creatinine. UMCR was calculated by dividing urinary microalbumin (μg/dL) by urinary creatinine (mg/dL) (13). A 2 cc blood sample was collected in a gel tube (yellow cap) for serum creatinine estimation and serum ferritin. Another 2 cc blood sample was collected in an Ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetate (EDTA) tube for pretransfusion Hb%. Samples were preserved at -20°C until further processing (14). The samples were processed using instruments and methods of estimation, and the cut-off range is shown in (Table/Fig 1) (13),(15),(16),(17),(18),(19),(20).

Statistical Analysis

The data were entered using Microsoft Excel version 2010 and analysed using R software version 3.6.1. The data were divided into two groups: those with microalbuminuria and those without microalbuminuria. All categorical data were presented as frequency and percentages. All continuous data were summarised using the mean, Standard Deviation (±SD), or median, Interquartile Ranges (IQR) based on the data distribution. All clinical and laboratory parameters were compared using the Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. All continuous measurements were assessed using independent sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U test based on the normal distribution assumption. The Shapiro-wilk test was used to test for normality. Risk factors for microalbuminuria were studied using step-wise multivariate logistic regression analysis for all the above-mentioned parameters. The Odds Ratio (OR) associated with a given factor was an estimate of the risk for microalbuminuria when the factor was present relative to that when the factor was absent; 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were used as a measure of the statistical precision of each OR. For all comparisons, the p-value was considered significant at the 5% level of significance.

Results

A total of 155 BTM subjects aged 2-18 years, attending the Thalassaemia day care centre, were included in the study. A total of 66 (42.6%) children were found to have microalbuminuria, and 89 (57.4%) did not have microalbuminuria. Microalbuminuria was present in the majority. A total of 35 (22.58%) children were between 5-10 years of age group, followed by 14 (9.03%) children between 10-15 years of age. There were 44 (28.39%) males and 22 (14.19%) females with a M:F ratio of 2:1 in the microalbuminuria-present group. In the microalbuminuria-absent group, there were 47 (30.32%) males and 42 (27.10%) females with a M:F ratio of 1.11:1. The number of females in the microalbuminuria group was less than that of the microalbuminuria-absent group (Table/Fig 2).

In the present study, the median frequency of blood transfusion in children with microalbuminuria was 103.5, and in children without microalbuminuria was 66 (p-value <0.001), suggesting a positive association of microalbuminuria with the frequency of blood transfusion (Table/Fig 3). The mean pretransfusion haemoglobin% in children with microalbuminuria was 8.53±1.05, whereas in those without microalbuminuria was 9.83±1.3 (p-value <0.001), suggesting a negative association of microalbuminuria with pretransfusion haemoglobin%. The median level of serum ferritin in children with microalbuminuria was 4100 ng/mL, whereas in those without microalbuminuria was 1800 ng/mL, with a significant p-value <0.001 as shown in Table/Figure-4, suggesting a positive association of microalbuminuria with serum ferritin level. The median urinary microalbumin level was 1695 μg/mL in patients with microalbuminuria and 780 μg/mL in those without microalbuminuria (Table/Fig 4).

Step-wise multivariate logistic regression analysis was done to predict the risk factors for microalbuminuria. Age (OR of 1.16; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.27; p-value=0.0002); frequency of transfusions (OR of 1.98; 95% CI: 1.29 to 3.06; p-value=0.002); height (cm) (OR of 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.05; p-value=0.0002); weight (kg) (OR of 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.11; p-value=0.0035); pretransfusion Hb% (OR- 0.20, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.52; p-value <0.001) and serum ferritin (OR- 8.63; 95% CI: 4.3-17.33; p-value <0.001); Urine Creatinine (OR of 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97 to 0.997; p-value=0.02) were associated with an increased risk of microalbuminuria, which was statistically significant (Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 6),(Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8),(Table/Fig 9),(Table/Fig 10),(Table/Fig 11),(Table/Fig 12).

Discussion

The management of thalassaemia has greatly improved in the past few years. People with β-thalassaemia requiring chronic transfusions are now living longer and have a better quality of life than before.

Due to the prevention of the toxic effects of iron on the heart and liver by the usage of appropriate chelation, such complications have reduced. Previously unexplored complications of thalassaemia, like renal dysfunction, are more evident now. However, literature on renal dysfunction in thalassaemia is limited.

The UMCR is considered to be one of the early indicators of kidney disease and a predictor of the outcome. Hence, the present study measured UMCR and looked for the prevalence of microalbuminuria in BTM patients and the association of microalbuminuria with clinical and laboratory parameters.

The present study included 155 children with BTM from a single centre. The prevalence of microalbuminuria in the present study was 42.6%, which is similar to other studies like Tantawy AA et al., (29%) and Hamwi D and Alquobaili F (30%), indicating significant evidence of renal injury in BTM children with no clinical features of renal disease (5),(21). The present study is the largest paediatric study conducted in recent years. All the studies compared were prospective studies from a single centre.

In the present study, as the age increases, the prevalence of microalbuminuria also increases, which was similar to the studies conducted by Doddamani P et al., and Hamwi D and Alquobaili F in which a positive correlation was found between microalbuminuria and the age of the child and the duration of blood transfusion (3),(21). However, Hamwi D and Alquobaili F found no significant correlation of microalbuminuria with age (21). These discordant results could be explained by the difference in age in the study group.

The mean pretransfusion Hb% of studies published by Hashemizadeh H and Noori R, Pemde H et al., Pemde HK et al., Najafipour F et al., were 8.5±1.5 gm/dL, 9.2±0.97 gm/dL, 9.7±0.4 gm/dL, respectively, which were similar to 9.2±1.36 gm/dL observed in the current study (22),(23),(24). The Thalassaemia International Federation recommends a moderate transfusion regimen to maintain the average pretransfusion haemoglobin level between 9-10.5 gm/dL (25).

The mean ferritin level of the current study was 2835±1628 ng/mL, which was comparable to similar studies with mean ferritin levels of 2183±525 ng/mL done by Hashemizadeh H et al., 3138±1499 ng/mL done by Pemde H et al., and 2888±948 ng/mL done by Najafipour F et al., respectively (22),(23),(24). In the present study, the prevalence of microalbuminuria was positively associated with serum ferritin level. Studies conducted by Hamwi D and Alquobaili F and Ziyadeh FN et al., also showed a positive association between microalbuminuria and serum ferritin level, explaining the toxic effects of unchelated iron on renal glomeruli and tubules (21),(26).

Serum creatinine levels in the present study were within the normal range with a mean of 0.36±0.13 mg/dL, which was comparable to the results expressed by other studies, namely Doddamani P et al., with 0.7±0.11 mg/dL, Adly AA et al., with 0.17±0.06 mg/dL, Tantawy AA et al., with 0.8±0.1 mg/dL, and Hamwi D and Alquobaili F with 0.521±0.009 mg/dL, respectively (3),(5),(6),(21). Serum creatinine is known to be an unreliable indicator of changes in kidney function as it is affected by factors unrelated to renal function, such as muscle mass, protein intake, inflammatory illness, and hepatic disease. Additionally, creatinine is partially secreted by renal tubules and frequently overestimates Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) (27).

The following parameters were not assessed in the present study but can be assessed in future studies. Serum cystatin C has been demonstrated to be superior to creatinine in the evaluation of minor reduction in GFR in some studies (28),(29). Cystatin C, a 122 amino acid non glycosylated low molecular weight (13 kDa) age and gender-independent cysteine protease inhibitor, is considered to be a housekeeping gene, which is transcribed at a relatively constant level and is expressed in all nucleated cells. It is freely filtered in the renal glomeruli and totally reabsorbed and metabolised in the proximal tubule. Thus, the serum concentration of Cystatin C is mainly determined by GFR (30).

Other early markers of renal dysfunction include β2 Microglobulin (β2MG), a low molecular weight protein which, under normal circumstances, is freely filtered at the glomerulus but almost totally reabsorbed by renal tubules (31). Elevation of β2MG in urine is a sensitive and reliable early marker of tubular dysfunction (32),(33).

N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) (34),(35),(36), a high molecular weight (140 KDa) lysosomal enzyme which plays a role in the breakdown of glycoproteins in proximal renal tubular cells, is considered mainly as a marker of renal tubular function. NAG is secreted by tubular epithelium. Its measurement has been undertaken in a variety of diseases associated with renal injury, such as thalassaemia major (8),(37),(38),(39),(40), glomerulonephritis (41), lupus (42), diabetes (43), and rheumatoid arthritis (44). The urinary NAG levels are increased before the increase in serum creatinine, urea, and microalbuminuria (39),(40),(41). Early identification of subjects at high-risk of developing renal failure is of great importance, as it may allow specific measures to delay the progression of renal damage and thus reduce the incidence of end-stage renal failure and mortality (34),(35),(36).

Limitation(s)

In the present study, authors were not able to estimate Cystatin C, β2MG, or NAG due to logistic reasons. Chelating agents are known to cause nephrotoxicity, particularly deferasirox, which is also known to cause microalbuminuria. Hence, patients on deferasirox need to be followed-up to look for nephrotoxicity. Rising serum creatinine levels are an indication of nephrotoxicity, which was not assessed in present study.

Conclusion

Over 42.6% of children with BTM on chronic transfusion therapy were found to have microalbuminuria. Advancing age, increased frequency of transfusion, low pretransfusion haemoglobin %, and raised serum ferritin were the four risk factors associated with significant microalbuminuria. Hence, interventional strategies aiming at the maintenance of normal haemoglobin and serum ferritin levels are recommended to prevent further renal damage. Further studies are needed to differentiate between microalbuminuria due to the progression of BTM or due to chelating agents. Urinary microalbumin assay, a novel non interventional and economical test, can be included in the screening protocol of children with β-thalassaemia for early detection of renal disease. Other novel biomarkers like cystatin C, β2-Microglobulin, and NAG can also be recommended to detect asymptomatic renal dysfunction.

References

1.
Rund D, Rachmilewitz E. β-Thalassaemia. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(11):1135-46. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Cooley TB, Lee P. Series of cases of splenomegaly and peculiar changes in the bones. Trans Am Pediatr Soc. 1925;37:29.
3.
Doddamani P, Suma MN, Ravi MD, Prashant A, Vishwanath P, Nagalakshmi CS. Importance of assessment of microalbuminuria in β-thalassaemia major patients. Int J Health Allied Sci. 2012;1(4):235.[crossref]
4.
Bekhit OE, Dash HH, Ahmed MS. Early detection of kidney dysfunction in Egyptian patients with beta-thalassaemia major. Egyptian Paediatric Association Gazette. 2017;1;65(3):85-89. [crossref]
5.
Tantawy AA, El Bablawy N, Adly AA, Ebeid FS. Early predictors of renal dysfunction in Egyptian patients with β-thalassaemia major and intermedia. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2014;6(1):e2014057. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Adly AA, Toaima DN, Mohamed NS, Seoud KM. Subclinical renal abnormalities in young thalassaemia major and intermedia patients and its relation to chelation therapy. Egypt J Medical Hum Genet. 2014;15(4):369-77. [crossref]
7.
Bakr A, Al-Tonbary Y, Osman G, El-Ashry R. Renal complications of beta-thalassaemia major in children. Am J Blood Res. 2014;4(1):01-06.
8.
Hamed EA, El Melegy NT. Renal functions in paediatric patients with beta-thalassaemia major: Relation to chelation therapy: Original prospective study. Ital J Pediatr. 2010;36(39):01-10. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Yassin N, Shamsuddin R, Shoujaa A. Assessment of microalbuminuria in β-Thalassaemia major patients. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res. 2022;45(1):36104-06. [crossref]
10.
Datta V, Ayengar JR, Karpate S, Chaturvedi P. Microalbuminuria as a predictor of early glomerular injury in children with sickle cell disease. Indian J Pediatr. 2003;70(4):307-09. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group, de Onis M. Enrolment and baseline characteristics in the WHO multicentre growth reference study. Acta Paediatrica. 2006;95:07-15. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Khadilkar VV, Khadilkar AV, Choudhury P, Agarwal KN, Ugra D, Shah NK. IAP growth monitoring guidelines for children from birth to 18 years. Indian Pediatr. 2007;44(3):187-97. PMID: 17413194.
13.
Robert D Toto. Microalbuminuria: Definition, detection, and clinical significance. J Clin Hypertens. 2004;6(11):01-07. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Tietz NW. Textbook of Clinical Chemistry. In: Burtis EA and Ashwood ER editors. 2nd ed. W.B. Saunders Company; 1994.
15.
Landry DW, Bazari H. Approach to the patient with renal disease. In: Goldman L, Schafer AI, eds. Goldman-Cecil Medicine. 26th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2020:ch 106.
16.
Oh MS, Briefel G, Pincus MR. Evaluation of renal function, water, electrolytes, and acid-base balance. In: McPherson RA, Pincus MR, eds. Henry’s Clinical Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods. 24th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2022:ch 15.
17.
Ferritin. Lab Tests Online. Available from: https://labtestsonline.org/tests/ferritin.
18.
Bacon BR, Kwiatkowski JL. Approach to the patient with suspected iron overload. 2022. Available from: https://pro.uptodatefree.ir/Show/7157.
19.
Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations. 3rd edition. Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW, editors. Boston: Butterworths; 1990. Chapter 151 Hemoglobin and Hematocrit. Henny H Billett.
20.
Prevention of Thalassaemias and Other Haemoglobin Disorders: Chapter 3 Haemoglobin pattern analysis. Volume 2: Laboratory Protocols [Internet]. 2nd edition. Nicosia (Cyprus): Thalassaemia International Federation; 2012.
21.
Hamwi D, Alquobaili F. Early markers of renal dysfunction in Syrian beta thalassaemia major patients. J Chem Pharm Res. 2015;7(6):568-72.
22.
Hashemizadeh H, Noori R. Assessment of physical growth in patients with beta thalassaemia major in Mashhad. Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ. 2013;9(4):446-54.
23.
Pemde H, Chandra J, Gupta D, Singh V, Sharma R, Dutta AK. Physical growth in children with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia. Paediatric Health Medicine and Therapeutics. 2011;2:13-19. [crossref]
24.
Najafipour F, Aliasgarzadeh A, Mohamadzadeh AN, Bahrami A, Mobasri M, Niafar M, et al. A cross-sectional study of metabolic and endocrine complications in beta-thalassaemia major. Ann Saudi Med. 2008;28(5):361-66. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
2021 Guidelines for the management of transfusion dependent Thalassaemia (TDT). Editors: Cappellini MD, Farmakis D, Porter J, Taher A. 4th ed. Thalassaemia International Federation. 2021.
26.
Ziyadeh FN, Musallam KM, Mallat NS, Mallat S, Jaber F, Suwaidan AA, et al. Glomerular hyper filtration and proteinuria in transfusion independent patients with β-thalassaemia intermedia. Nephron Clin. Pract. 2012;121(3-4):c136-43. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Nickolas TL, Barasch J, Devarajan P. Biomarkers in acute and chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2008;17(2):127-32. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Stevens LA, Coresh J, Schmid CH, Feldman HI, Froissart M, Kusek J. Estimating GFR using serum cystatin C alone and in combination with serum creatinine: A pooled analysis of 3,418 individuals with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;51(3):395-406. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Rigalleau V, Beauvieux MC, Lasseur C, Chauveau P, Raffaitin C, Perlemoine C, et al. The combination of cystatin C and serum creatinine improves the monitoring of kidney function in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Clin Chem. 2007;53(11):1988-89. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Dharnidharka VR, Kwon C, Stevens G. Serum cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function: A meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;40(2):221-26. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Herrero-Morín JD, Malaga S, Fernandez N, Rey C, Diéguez MA,Solís G. Cystatin C and beta-2-microglobulin: Markers of glomerular filtration in critically ill children. Crit Care. 2007;11(3):R59. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Guder WG, Hofmann W. Markers for the diagnosis and monitoring of renal tubular lesions. Clin Nephrol Suppl. 1992;38:S03-07.
33.
Portman RJ, Kissane JM, Robson AM. Use of beta-2-microglobulin to diagnose tubulo-interstitial renal lesions in children. Kidney Int. 1986;30(1):91-98. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Mallat NS, Mallat SG, Musallam KM. Potential mechanisms for renal damage in beta-thalassaemia. J Nephrol. 2013;26(5):821-28. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Ponticelli C, Musallam KM, Cianciulli P, Cappellini MD. Renal complications in transfusion-dependent beta thalassaemia Blood Rev. 2010;24(6):239-44.[crossref][PubMed]
36.
Bhandari S, Galanello R. Renal aspects of thalassaemia a changing paradigm. Europ J Haematol. 2012;89(3):187-97. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Smolkin V, Halevy R, Levin C, Mines M, Sakran W, Ilia K, et al. Renal function in children with β-thalassaemia major and thalassaemia intermedia. Pediatr Nephrol. 2008;23(10):1847-51. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Mohkam M, Shamsian BS, Gharib A, Nariman S, Arzanian MT. Early markers of renal dysfunction in patients with beta-thalassaemia major. Pediatr Nephrol. 2008;23(6):971-76. [crossref][PubMed]
39.
Hashemieh M. Early detection of renal dysfunction in β Thalassaemia with focus on novel biomarkers. Iran J Ped Hematol Oncol. 2020;10(1):57-68. [crossref]
40.
Jalali A, Khalilian H, Ahmadzadeh A, Sarvestani S, Rahim F, Zandian K, et al. Renal function in transfusion-dependent paediatric beta-thalassaemia major patients. Hematology. 2011;16(4):249-54. [crossref][PubMed]
41.
Bazzi C, Petrini C, Rizza V, Arrigo G, Napodano P, Paparella M, et al. Urinary N-acetyl-b-glucosaminidase excretion is a marker of tubular cell dysfunction and a predictor of outcome in primary glomerulonephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17(11):1890-96. [crossref][PubMed]
42.
Mohsen MA, Karim SAA, Sultan WA, Abbas TM. Urinary N-Acetyl-Beta-D Glucosaminidase, a marker of Tubular dysfunction, in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Kidney Res J. 2012;2(1):01-11. [crossref]
43.
Ambade V, Sing P, Somani BL, Basanna D. Urinary N-acetyl beta glucosaminidase and gamma glutamyl transferase as early markers of diabetic nephropathy. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2006;21(2):142-48. [crossref][PubMed]
44.
Dilek E, Denan A, Ilhan B, Eker D, Fatma Z. Urinary N-acetyl- β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) in lupus nephritis and rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Lab Anal. 2005;19(4):172-76.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/64161.19211

Date of Submission: Mar 23, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Oct 07, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jan 13, 2024
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 18, 2023
• Manual Googling: Oct 13, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jan 11, 2024 (13%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com