Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 20446

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : March | Volume : 18 | Issue : 3 | Page : EC41 - EC47 Full Version

Clinicopathological Study of CD34 Antigen Expression in Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: March 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/66137.19208
Raghavendra Singh, Tarun Mishra, Pooja Agarwal, Shikha Prakash, Lalit Kumar, Surendra Pathak, Nupur Kaushik, Rajdeep Singh

1. Junior Resident, Department of Pathology, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India. 3. Professor, Department of Pathology, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India. 5. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India. 6. Professor, Department of General Surgery, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India. 7. Senior Resident, Department of Pathology, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India. 8. Junior Resident, Department of Pathology, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Lalit Kumar,
C/O Surendra Arora, Bhagwanti Niwas, 38-MIG, New Shahganj Colony, Agra-282010, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: drlalitpal@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer among women. The CD34 immunohistochemical antigen serves as a tool in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions. It has been suggested that CD34 may be related to invasive potential.

Aim: To evaluate the expression of the CD34 antigen in the stroma of benign and malignant breast lesions using the Immunohistochemistry (IHC) method.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Pathology in collaboration with the Department of Surgery at Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India over a period of 18 months (from January 2021 to June 2022), involving a total of 50 histopathologically confirmed cases of benign and malignant breast lesions. Postsurgical specimens, including biopsies and mastectomies, were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. The initial diagnosis was made by Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-stained tissue sections. Sections from the same block were subjected to IHC staining using a monoclonal antibody to the CD34 antigen, and the intensity of expression in stromal cells was graded from 0 to 3+ based on nuclear positivity: up to 5% stromal cells immunoreactive (grade-0), >5% and up to 25% (grade-1), >25% and up to 50% (grade-2), and > 50% (grade-3). The data was entered into Microsoft Excel 2007 and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) statistical software version 19.0. The inferential statistics included the use of the Chi-square test.

Results: Out of the total 50 cases evaluated, 25 (50%) were categorised as benign, and rest 25 (50%) were categorised as malignant lesions. Among the benign lesions, the most common lesion was fibroadenoma, accounting for 9 (36%) cases, followed by benign phyllode tumour, with 6 (24%) cases. Among malignant lesions, the most common lesion was Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC), accounting for 23 (92%) cases. The intensity of CD34 expression was found to be significantly higher in benign as compared to malignant breast lesions. Out of the 25 benign breast cases, the maximum number of cases (19) showed Grade-3+ positivity, 5 cases showed Grade-2+, and 1 case showed Grade-0 positivity. However, among malignant lesions, maximum cases (23, 92%) showed Grade-0 on CD34 immunostaining.

Conclusion: This study was undertaken to evaluate the CD34 expression in benign and malignant breast lesions which might be able to distinguish between the benign and malignant breast lesions. The most benign breast lesions express CD34 in the stroma, while it is almost totally lost in all malignant neoplasms. Loss of CD34 is associated with the tumour’s capacity for invasion. However, to determine its function as a therapeutic target in cases of breast cancer, additional research can also be done.

Keywords

Breast cancer, Immunohistochemistry, Lactating adenoma, Squamous papilloma

The most frequent cancer among women in the world today is breast cancer. For women between the ages of 35 and 55 years, it is the main cause of cancer-associated death. Breast carcinoma is the second most prevalent cause of cancer death, after lung carcinoma (1),(2). The higher rate of early-stage disease diagnosis is responsible for the current trend towards improvement in the death rate for breast cancer, although our therapeutic choices for advanced stage breast carcinomas are still restricted. The development of targeted and molecular-based therapies will therefore require a deeper understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the onset and progression of breast cancer (3). Although histopathology is the gold standard for the identification of breast lesions, IHC study also plays a significant role when histological diagnosis is equivocal, particularly when distinguishing invasive carcinomas from in-situ carcinomas. Myoepithelial cells, fibroblasts, and leukocytes, among other stromal cells, tightly control the breast tumour’s development, differentiation, and invasiveness (4). The transmembrane glycoprotein CD34 is expressed by mesenchymal cells in numerous places such as the prostate, urinary bladder, fallopian tube, etc., including the normal mammary stroma, and it functions as a modulator of cell adhesion and signal transmission. Mesenchymal cells have been shown to lose CD34 in several contexts, including when the mesenchymal population undergoes malignant transformation. Malignant breast phyllodes tumours have lower CD34 levels than benign phyllodes tumours or fibroadenomas (5),(6). Therefore, the study was conducted to compare the expression of the CD34 antigen in benign and malignant breast lesions and to establish its diagnostic efficacy for benign and malignant breast lesions as a diagnostic tool.

Material and Methods

The cross-sectional study was conducted in collaboration between the Department of Pathology and the Department of Surgery at Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India. The study was conducted over a period of 18 months, from January 2021 to June 2022. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional ethical committee (IEC/2021/40).

Inclusion criteria: Histopathologically confirmed cases of benign and malignant breast lesions, adequate tissue for further processing for CD34, cases with detailed clinical examination for clinicopathological correlation were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Inadequate and autolysed tissue, patients with metastatic tumours from systemic malignancies were excluded from the study.

A total of 50 cases (25 cases of benign lesions and 25 cases of malignant lesions) of surgically resected mastectomy and lumpectomy breast specimens, including biopsies, were included in the present study. After receiving the samples, gross inspection was done and the size and appearance of the tumour were documented. After incising (bread loafing), the specimens were fixed in 10% formal saline for 12 to 24 hours. Tissue sections from the representative areas were then submitted for further processing, and paraffin wax blocks were made. Sections of 3-4 μm were made from the paraffin wax blocks and stained by routine H&E dye, then examined under a light microscope. A histological diagnosis was made, including modified Bloom-Richardson histological grading. Another section of 3-4 μm was used for IHC for CD34 and stained using the Thermo Scientific CD34 (Clone QBEnd/10) kit. The representative sections from all the cases were studied. Each section was examined, and the number of terminal duct/lobular units was identified. The sections were evaluated at high power (400X microscopic field; objective 40X, eyepiece 10X), considering a high-power microscopic field harboured 100 stromal cells.

Grading was done from 0 to 3+ (7):

0: ≤5% stromal cells immunoreactive
1+: >5 to 25% stromal cells immunoreactive
2+: >25 to 50% stromal cells immunoreactive
3+: > 50% stromal cells immunoreactive

The staining of endothelial cells in blood vessels was used as an internal control (7). Grade-0 was interpreted as a complete loss of CD34. Grade-1 was interpreted as reduced expression, while Grade-2 and 3 were interpreted as retained expression of CD34. In the present study, Grade-0 and Grade-1 were considered as CD34 negative, and Grade-2 and Grade-3 were considered as CD34 positive (7). The age of the patient and the site of lesions (right breast or left breast) were considered in clinicopathological correlation. Histological grading was done using the modified Bloom Richardson grading system based on tubule formation, nuclear pleomorphism, and mitotic figures (8).

1. Tubule formation:

• Score 1: >75% of tumour has tubules
• Score 2: 10%-75% of tumour has tubules
• Score 3: <10% tubule formation

2. Nuclear pleomorphism:

• Score 1: Tumour nuclei similar to normal ductal cell nuclei (2-3 x RBC)
• Score 2: Intermediate size nuclei
• Score 3: Large nuclei, usually vesicular with prominent nucleoli

3. Mitotic count (per 10 HPF with 40X objective and field area of 0.196 mm2)

• Score 1: 0-7 mitoses
• Score 2: 8-14 mitoses
• Score 3: 15 or more mitoses

Modified Bloom Richardson Grading:

• Grade-1=Scores of 3, 4 or 5
• Grade-2=Scores of 6 or 7
• Grade-3=Scores of 8 or 9

Statistical Analysis

The data was entered into Microsoft Excel 2007 and analysed using SPSS statistical software version 19.0. The descriptive statistics included frequency and percentage. The inferential statistics included the use of the Chi-square test.

Results

A total of 50 histopathologically confirmed cases of benign and malignant breast lesions were studied for the immunohistochemical expression of CD34. Out of the total 50 cases, only two cases were male, and the remaining 48 cases were female. Of the total 50 cases, the maximum number of cases (13 cases) was found in the 31-40 years age group, followed by the 41-50 years age group (10 cases) and the 11-20 years age group (nine cases). Out of these, 25 (50%) cases were benign, and 25 (50%) cases were malignant. Among benign lesions, the most common lesion was fibroadenoma with nine (36%) cases (Table/Fig 1)a,b, followed by benign phyllode tumour with six (24%) cases (Table/Fig 2)a,b, fibroadenosis with three (12%) cases, and gynecomastia with two (8%) cases (Table/Fig 3)a,b, and each (4%) case of FA with epithelial hyperplasia, FA with ductal hyperplasia, and apocrine metaplasia (Table/Fig 4)a,b, FA with apocrine metaplasia, Lactating adenoma [Table/Fig-5a,b], and Squamous papilloma. The most common malignant lesion was IDC with 23 (92%) cases (Table/Fig 6)a,b,(Table/Fig 7)a,b,(Table/Fig 8)a,b, followed by one (4%) case each of malignant phyllode tumour (Table/Fig 9)a,b and Intraductal papillary carcinoma (Table/Fig 10)a,b,(Table/Fig 11).

In this study, in the benign cases, the most common age group affected was 11-20 years, with nine cases (36%), followed by the 21-30 and 31-40 years age groups, with six cases each (24%). Out of the total 25 cases of malignant lesions, the maximum cases were found to affect the 41-50 years age group, followed by the 31-40 year age group, with seven cases (Table/Fig 12).

In this study, out of 25 benign breast cases, the maximum number of cases (19 cases) were found to be grade-3 positive, followed by grade-2 positivity in five cases and grade-0 in one case. Out of the nine cases of fibroadenoma, six cases showed grade-3 positivity. Out of the total six cases of benign phyllodes tumour, the maximum cases (04 cases, 66.7%) showed grade-3 positivity (Table/Fig 2)b. The difference was statistically significant (p-value=0.025) when analysed using the Chi-square test (Table/Fig 13).

In this study, out of 23 cases of IDC, the maximum cases of IDC showed Grade-0 positivity (21 cases, 91.3%), followed by 2 (8.7%) cases of Grade-1+; while each case of malignant phyllode tumour and intraductal papillary carcinoma were found to be Grade-0 positive. The difference was statistically non-significant when analysed using the Chi-square test (p-value=0.934) (Table/Fig 14).

In this study, based on the association of the histological grade of IDC with CD34 expression, the maximum cases of IDC Grade-1 (09 cases, 81.81%) showed Grade-0 positivity, and 02 cases (18.11%) showed Grade-1 positivity with CD34 immunostaining. All cases of IDC with histological Grade-2 (05 cases) and Grade-3 (07 cases) showed Grade-0 positivity with CD34 immunostaining (Table/Fig 15).

Discussion

Breast cancer is still one of the most common diseases in India and throughout the world, continuing to take a high toll on human life despite recent improvements and numerous studies conducted in this field. Studies on newer techniques for breast cancer treatment and quick and accurate diagnosis of cancer are desperately required (9). The stroma surrounding the tumour is significantly different from normal stroma due to changes in protein synthesis, which also controls the proliferation of the tumour’s epithelial component (10). Mesenchymal cells expressed CD34, a transmembrane glycoprotein, at various places, including the normal mammary stroma. It was thought to be involved in the control of cell adhesion and signal transmission. Mesenchymal cells have been shown to lose CD34 in several circumstances when there has been a malignant change in the mesenchymal population (11). The function of the stromal microenvironment in the development of different tumours has long been debated. The stroma surrounding the tumour is significantly different from normal stroma due to changes in protein synthesis, which also controls the proliferation of the tumour’s epithelial component (7),(10). Mesenchymal cells express CD34, a transmembrane glycoprotein, at various places, including the normal mammary stroma (11). Improved knowledge of the molecular and cellular mechanisms behind tumour progression can help in the early diagnosis of breast carcinomas as well as the development of specific therapies. The function of the stromal microenvironment in the development of different tumours has long been debated (7).

The present study was performed on a total of 50 cases of breast lesions; 25 cases were benign, and 25 cases were malignant. The histopathological diagnosis was made on H&E section: thereafter IHC staining for CD34 on histological sections of breast lesions. In this study, out of a total of 50 cases, 48 patients were female and 2 patients were male. The youngest patient encountered in this study was a 15-year-old female, and the oldest patient was a 65-year-old female. Maximum number of cases were in the 4th to 6th decade of life.

Similar results were found by Bharti R and Khan AA et al., while Chakraborty AP et al., and Kuroda N et al., found the maximum number of cases in individuals older than the 5th decade of life (62%), and Chen Z et al., found the maximum number of cases in individuals older than the 4th decade of life (7),(12),(13),(14),(15). Moreover, present study found that the maximum number of benign lesion cases occurred in the 2nd to 3rd decade of life, and the maximum number of malignant lesions were found in the 4th to 5th decade of life. Present study found that the maximum number of breast lesions were IDC, followed by fibroadenoma. Similar results were found by Cimpean AM et al., (41.00% cases of IDC), Tete A et al., (43.5% cases of IDC), and Kuroda N et al., (31.20% cases of IDC) (4),(9),(14), while Chakraborty AP et al., found fibroadenomas (21.70% cases) to be the most common lesion, followed by IDC (11.00% cases) (7). Chauhan H et al., found DCIS (40.74% cases) to be the most common lesion, followed by IDC (29.60% cases), and Moore T et al., found phyllodes tumour (42.60% cases) to be the most common lesion, followed by FA (24.50% cases) (6),(11).

Present study found that in the benign lesions, the maximum number of benign cases were fibroadenomas (36.00% cases), followed by benign phyllodes tumours (24% cases). Similar results were found by Khan AA et al., Elancheran M et al., and Kaçar A et al., as they found 74.69%, 84.5%, and 64.20% cases of fibroadenomas, respectively (13),(16),(17). While Chauhan H et al., found radical scar lesions (66.66% cases) to be the most common benign lesion, followed by fibroadenomas (33.33% cases) (11). Among the malignant lesions, the maximum number of malignant breast lesions were IDC (92.00% cases). Similar results were found by Elancheran M et al., Khan AA et al., and Chen Z et al., as they found that 95.65%, 88.5%, and 95.45% cases of IDC, respectively (13),(15),(16).

Based on the staining grading system of CD34, in this study, present study found that the maximum benign breast lesions (19 cases) showed grade-3 CD34 positivity, followed by grade-2 positivity in 05 cases, and a single case of squamous papilloma showed CD34 negativity. Similar results were found by Chakraborty AP et al., Chauhan H et al., Khan AA et al., Song JY et al., and Yazhou C et al., (7),(11),(13),(18),(19). However, the maximum malignant lesions (23 cases, 92%) showed grade-0 positivity, followed by 02 cases (8%) with grade-1 positivity with CD34 immunostaining, which was found to be concordant with Moore T et al., Tete A et al., Chauhan H et al., Khan AA et al., and Kuroda N et al., (6),(9),(11),(13),(14).

In this study, all benign lesions were CD34 positive, except for the single case of squamous papilloma. The study was found concordant with Cimpean AM et al., Chakraborty AP et al., Tete A et al., Elancheran M et al., and Noronha Y et al., (4),(7),(9),(16),(20). Although, all malignant lesions were found to be CD34 negative. The result was consistent with Chakraborty AP et al., Tete A et al., Chauhan H et al., Khan AA et al., Elancheran M et al., and Yazhou C et al., (7),(9),(11),(13),(16),(19).

In the present study, based on the correlation of the histological grade of IDC with CD34 grading, the maximum cases (9/11 cases) of histological Grade-1 showed CD34 Grade-0 staining, and 2/11 cases showed CD34 Grade-1 staining. All cases of histological Grade-2 and Grade-3 showed CD34 Grade-0 staining. However, all cases of histological grades 1, 2, and 3 were found to be CD34 negative. Bharti R found that all cases of histological grades 1, 2, and 3 were CD34 negative, except for one case of histological Grade-1, which showed CD34 positivity (12). Chakraborty AP et al., found that all cases of histological grades 1, 2, and 3 were CD34 negative with Grade-0 CD34 staining in all cases (7).

Limitation(s)

The limitation of the study was the restricted number of cases and the use of a limited marker, as many myoepithelial markers are used to differentiate between benign and malignant breast lesions.

Conclusion

The present study was undertaken to evaluate the expression of the CD34 antigen in the stroma of benign and malignant breast lesions using IHC method. It is concluded that diffuse expression of CD34 is present in the normal breast stroma, in addition to the blood vessel wall. Most benign breast lesions express CD34 in the stroma. In all malignant neoplasms, CD34 expression in the stroma is almost totally lost. Loss of CD34 is associated with the tumour’s capacity for invasion. It might be able to distinguish between benign and malignant breast lesions and act as a key diagnostic indicator. To determine its function as a therapeutic target in cases of breast cancer, additional research can also be done.

References

1.
Köhrmann A, Kammerer U, Kapp M, Dietl J, Anacker J. Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs) in primary human breast cancer and breast cancer cell lines: New findings and review of the literature. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:188. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Khadem R, Mahdi FC, AI-Mosawi K, AL-Janabi AA. The role of estrogen in breast cancer. Biomed Biotechnol Res J. 2020;4(4):293-96. [crossref]
3.
Allinen M, Beroukhim R, Cai L, Brennan C, Lahti-Domenici J, Huang H, et al. Molecular characterization of the tumour microenvironment in breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2004;6(1):17-32. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Cimpean AM, Raica M, Narita D. Diagnostic significance of the immunoexpression of CD34 and smooth muscle cell actin in benign and malignant tumours of the breast. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2005;46(2):123-29.
5.
Yamazaki K, Eyden BP. Ultrastructural and immunohistochemical observation on intralobular fibroblasts of human breast with observations on the CD34 antigen. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol. 1995;27(3):309-23.
6.
Moore T, Lee AHS. Expression of CD34 and bcl-2 in phyllodes tumours, fibroadenomas and spindle cell lesions of the breast. Histopathology. 2001;38(1):62-67. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Chakraborty AP, Mukhopadhyay D, Mandal A, Samaddar A, Pathak S. Clinicopathological study of breast lesions with special reference to the role of CD34 immunostaining in diagnosis a cross-sectional study from a tertiary care hospital of West Bengal, India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2022;16(4):EC36-EC40. [crossref]
8.
Hoda SA. Invasive ductal carcinoma: Assessment of prognosis with morphologic and biologic markers. In Rosen PP. Rosen’s Breast Pathology. 4th ed; 2014: Pp. 429.
9.
Tete A, Kumari N, Sinha AK. A study of CD34 antigen expression in benign and malignant breast lesions in patients attending RIMS, Ranchi. IOSR J Med Dent Sci. (IOSR-JDMS). 2022;21(2):37-43.
10.
Silberstein GB. Tumour-stromal interactions: Role of the stroma in mammary development. Breast Cancer Res. 2001;3(4):218-23.
11.
Chauhan H, Abraham A, Phillips JRA, Pringle JH, Walker RA, Jones JL. There is more than one kind of myofibroblast: Analysis of CD34 expression in benign, in situ, and invasive breast lesions. J Clin Pathol. 2003;56(4):271-76. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Bharti R. CD34 expression as a surrogate marker for diagnosis of invasive ductal carcinoma of breast. Int J Sci Res. 2021;10(05):28-30. [crossref]
13.
Khan AA, Alam K, Harris H. A clinicopathological study of CD34 antigen expression in benign and malignant breast lesions. J Clin Exp Pathol. 2017;7(4):01-09. [crossref]
14.
Kuroda N, Jin YL, Hamauzu T, Toi M, Miyazaki E, Hiroi M, et al. Consistent lack of CD34-positive stromal cells in the stroma of malignant breast lesions. Histol Histopathol. 2005;20(3):707-12.
15.
Chen Z, Xu S, Xu W, Huang J, Zhang GU, Lei L, et al. Expression of cluster of differentiation 34 and vascular endothelial growth factor in breast cancer, and their prognostic significance. Oncol Lett. 2015;10(2):723-29. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Elancheran, Dhivya M, Raghuveer CR, Rajkumar P. Stromal expression of CD34 immunohistochemical antigen in proliferative lesions of breast. IAIM. 2019;6(4):156-59.
17.
Kaçar A, Paker I, Akbiyik F, Arikok AT, Mambet E. CD117 and CD34 staining patterns in childhood benign mammary lesions. Turk J Pathol. 2012;28(1):31-37. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Song JY, Yoon HK. Immunohistochemical phenotypes of phyllodes tumour of the breast. Korean J Pathol. 2008;42(3):151-56.
19.
Yazhou C, Wenlv S, Weidong Z, Licun W. Clinicopathological significance of stromal myofibroblasts in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Tumour Biol. 2004;25(5-6):290-95. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Noronha Y, Raza A, Hutchins B, Chase D, Garberoglio C, Chu P, et al. CD34, CD117, and Ki-67 Expression in Phyllodes tumour of the breast: An immunohistochemical study of 33 cases. Int J Sur Pathol. 2011;19(2):152-58.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/66137.19208

Date of Submission: Jun 19, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Sep 14, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jan 18, 2024
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 20, 2023
• Manual Googling: Sep 19, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jan 16, 2024 (15%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com