Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 92370

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : March | Volume : 18 | Issue : 3 | Page : EC08 - EC12 Full Version

Immunohistochemical Expression of PD-L1 in Core Biopsy Samples of Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and its Association with Histopathological and Clinicoradiological Parameters


Published: March 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/63359.19114
Swagata Karan, Prajna Das, Ranjita Panigrahi, C Mohan Rao

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Pathology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 2. Professor, Department of Pathology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 3. Professor, Department of Pathology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 4. Professor, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Correspondence Address :
Prajna Das,
Plot No. 196, Lane 3, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013, Odisha, India.
E-mail: prajnadas68@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Lung cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. In addition to chemotherapy, immunotherapy has yielded favourable outcomes in advanced, surgically non resectable Non Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC). The inhibition of immune checkpoints by monoclonal antibodies targeting Programmed Death 1 (PD-1) and Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) plays a pivotal role in preventing the downregulation of antitumour immunity.

Aim: To study the expression of PD-L1 in NSCLC cases from core biopsy specimens and its association with histological types, grades of tumour along with clinicoradiological parameters (age, sex, smoking status, and radiological location of the tumour).

Materials and Methods: This ambispective study was done in the Pathology Department of Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India, over two years from October 2020 to August 2022. The authors studied 35 cases of histopathologically and Immunohistochemically (IHC) diagnosed NSCLC. Partial or complete membranous staining of any intensity in ≥1% of tumour cells was considered positive in IHC. The Tumour Proportion Scoring (TPS) used for PD-L1 reporting was as follows: TPS <1%: negative, TPS 1-49%: low positive expression, and TPS ≥50%: high positive expression. Microsoft excel and Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0 software were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The most common age group was 61-70 years (12 cases; 34.29%), with a male predominance 24 (68.60). Chronic smokers (16 cases; 45.71%) were commonly affected. Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) was the common histological type (21 cases; 60%). Overall, 14 cases (40.0%) showed low (1-49%) and 5 cases (14.30%) showed high (≥50%) positive TPS of PD-L1 expression, respectively. Three cases (27.3%) of Grade 2 SCC and one case (10%) of Grade 3 SCC expressed high positivity. There was a statistical association between PD-L1 expression and male sex (p-value 0.01), positive smoking history (p-value 0.048), and SCC (p-value 0.032).

Conclusion: The PD-L1 expression is associated with increased tumour proliferation, aggressiveness, as well as shorter survival period in advanced NSCLC. The present study showed a significant association of PD-L1 expression in males, chronic smokers, and SCC. As per the existing literature, its association with clinicoradiological parameters is not clear. Future research with a larger cohort study, along with other predictive biomarkers, is highly desired to reach conclusive evidence.

Keywords

Adenocarcinoma, Immunotherapy, Programmed death ligand 1, Squamous cell carcinoma

Worldwide, lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths (1). As per data from the Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN 2020), it is the 2nd common cancer, with an incidence of 2,206,771 patients per year and 1,796,144 deaths annually (2). It represents approximately one in 10 (11.4%) cancer cases and one in 5 (18.0%) cancer-related deaths worldwide (2). In India, the incidence is 5.9% of all cancers and 8.1% of cancer-related deaths (3).

In 2008, the World Health Organisation (WHO) classified lung carcinoma broadly into two histological types: Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (SCLC) and Non Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC) (4). SCLCs (15% of all lung cancer types) are neuroendocrine tumours. NSCLC is the most common type, comprising 80% of all tumour types (4). According to the 2015 WHO classification of thoracic tumours, NSCLCs are subcategorised into Adenocarcinoma (ADC), Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC), Large Cell Carcinoma, and NSCLC-Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) (5). The new WHO classification of thoracic tumours in 2021 has emphasised using Immunohistochemical (IHC) and molecular techniques for more accurate diagnosis (6).

There are many biomarkers used for the definitive diagnosis of lung cancer, such as Thyroid Transcription Factor-1 (TTF-1), Napsin-A, p63, Cytokeratin (CK 5/6), and neuroendocrine markers, along with many prognostic molecular indices like Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK), ROS-1, Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), and PD-L1 (7).

Despite advanced treatment modalities, the prognosis of NSCLC remains poor. Immune checkpoint blockade has recently emerged as a promising and novel treatment for cancer. This has led to the development of immunotherapies, particularly antibodies targeting the PD-1 receptor and its ligand PD-L1 (8),(9). These have been extensively studied in lung cancer (8),(9). The primary role of PD-L1 is to mediate innate and adaptive immune resistance in tumour cells. CD8+ T-cells release Interferon Gamma (IFN-γ), which plays a major role in inducing PD-L1 expression (10),(11). Upregulation of PD-L1 expression can also occur due to oncogenic signaling by tumour cells, as evidenced by the high expression of PD-L1 in some cancers, despite a lack of Tumour-infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs). Activation of T cells leads to the inhibition of the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction, allowing tumour cells to bypass immune surveillance. Thus, enhancing the active immune response against tumours can be achieved by blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. Inhibitors of PD-1/PD-L1 have shown improvement in patients with PD-L1 overexpression compared with those with low or no expression of PD-L1 in lung cancer (12),(13).

The rationale for the present study was to observe PD-L1 overexpression in NSCLC cases where patients may benefit from immunotherapy and to assess its association with various histological types and grades of tumours, along with clinicoradiological parameters.

The aim of this study was to analyse PD-L1 expression in NSCLC cases from core needle biopsy samples and its association with histological types, grades, and clinical parameters like age, sex, smoking status, and location of tumour by imaging studies.

Material and Methods

This ambispective study was done in the Pathology Department of Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India, over a period of two years (October 2020 to August 2022). A total of 14 cases from January 2019 to September 2020 were archived, and 21 cases were prospective from 2020 to 2022. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients before the procedures and also before IHC analysis in both prospective and retrospective cases. Approval by the Ethics Committee of the Institution, bearing IEC no. KIIT/KIMS/IEC/459/2020, was obtained before conducting the study.

Initially, 47 cases of lung mass lesions identified in radiology were selected for the present study. Three cases were excluded as they were diagnosed as small cell carcinoma on IHC. Out of the remaining 44 cases, four cases were proven to be metastatic carcinoma on IHC, three cases had extensive tumour necrosis which was unsuitable for IHC, and two were non representative biopsy samples. Therefore, 12 biopsy samples were excluded from the present study. Consequently, a total of 35 cases of clinically suspected and radiologically detected lung mass lesions were selected. These cases were histologically diagnosed and IHC confirmed to be NSCLC with subtyping.

Inclusion criteria: Core needle biopsies were taken from radiologically detected mass lesions in the lungs by various procedures like Computed Tomography (CT) guided Percutaneous Transthoracic Lung Biopsy (PTLB), flexible bronchoscopy-assisted Transbronchial Lung Biopsy (TBLB), and Endobronchial Ultrasound Bronchoscopy (EBUS). Cases that were histologically diagnosed and IHC confirmed to be NSCLC were included in the present study.

Exclusion criteria:

• Other types of lung cancer;
• Metastatic lesions;
• Non-representative biopsy samples;
• Tumours with extensive necrosis;
• Crushing artifacts.

Study Procedure

A Baxter Deerfield IL Trucut biopsy needle was used for collecting PTLB samples from peripherally located lung masses. These samples were obtained from the Department of Radiodiagnosis. TBLB and EBUS samples were received from the Department of Pulmonary Medicine. The samples obtained by the aforementioned procedures were immediately fixed in 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin (NBF) and sent to the Pathology Department. Clinical data like age, sex, smoking status, and radiological findings were recorded.

Histology: All the core biopsy samples received in the Pathology Department were subjected to routine processing for 16 hours in a Leica automated tissue processor. Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-stained slides were prepared from Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks of tissue. Tumour subtyping and grading were done according to the WHO classification of Thoracic Tumours (5th edition, 2021) (6).

Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Rabbit antihuman monoclonal antibody (clone QR001) from BIOCYC, Germany, was used for the PD-L1 study. IHC was done according to standard protocols.

Quality Control (Table/Fig 1)a-c: External positive and negative control slides were used with each batch of IHC staining. For the positive external control of PD-L1, tonsil and placental tissue were used. Strong membranous staining of the tonsillar epithelium and trophoblastic cells in the placenta were considered positive external controls. The omission of the primary antibody and the incubation of the test slide in Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS) for each batch of staining served as the negative control. Membranous staining of alveolar macrophages acted as a positive internal control.

Scoring pattern: A minimum of 100 viable tumour cells were counted per core biopsy specimen, and the Tumour Proportion Score (TPS) was measured. Complete or partial membranous pattern with or without cytoplasmic staining of any intensity, was considered positive. Only cytoplasmic staining was not considered to be positive. PD-L1 expression was assigned scores based on the following TPS system (12):

• TC0 (Negative): Membranous staining in less than 1% of tumour cells.
• TC1 (Low positive): Membranous staining in 1% to less than 50% of tumour cells.
• TC2 (High positive): Membranous staining in 50% or more of tumour cells.

Statistical Analysis

Microsoft excel and SPSS version 25 software were used for statistical analysis. A p-value of less than 0.05 using the Chi-square test was considered significant.

Results

Out of 35 cases in the present study, 20 (57.14%) cases were TBLB, 10 (28.57%) cases were PTLB, and 5 (14.29%) cases were EBUS.

Clinical parameters: Of the 35 cases of NSCLC included in the present study, the most commonly affected age group was 61-70 years 12 (34.29%) cases, with a mean age of 57.74 years. There was a male predominance 24 (68.60%) cases over females 11 (31.40%) cases, with an M:F ratio of 2.18:1. Chronic smokers 16 (45.71%) cases were more affected, followed by non smokers 15 (42.86%) cases and exsmokers 4 (11.43%) cases. The right lung was a more common location 25 (71.43%) cases, and the upper lobes were most frequently involved in both lungs 17 (48.57%) cases (Table/Fig 2).

Association between PD-L1 expression and clinicoradiological parameters (Table/Fig 2): In the present study, a statistically significant correlation was observed between PD-L1 expression and male gender (p-value 0.019) as well as the smoking status of the patients (p-value 0.046). Radiologically, 25 (71.43%) cases had right lung involvement and 10 (28.57%) cases had left lung involvement. Of the right lung NSCLC cases, 10 (40%) cases showed negative, 11 (44%) cases showed low positive, and 4 (16%) cases showed high positive PD-L1 expression. Of the left lung NSCLC cases, 6 (60%) cases, 3 (30%) cases, and 1 (10%) cases showed negative, low positive, and high positive PD-L1 expression, respectively. The location of NSCLC and PD-L1 expression was not statistically significant (p-value=0.5613).

NSCLC subtyping and grading (Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4): Histomorpholo-gically, the most frequent type was Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) 21 (60%) cases, followed by Adenocarcinoma (ADC) 13 (37.14%) cases, and adenosquamous carcinoma 1 (2.86%) cases. Of the 13 ADC cases, 6 (17.14%) cases each were Grade 1 and Grade 2, while only one case belonged to Grade 3 (2.86%). Of the 21 SCC cases, Grade 2 was the most common 11 (31.43%) cases, followed by Grade 3 10 (28.57%) cases. There were no Grade 1 SCC cases. The single case (2.86%) of adenosquamous cell carcinoma was Grade 3.

Association between PD-L1 expression and histopathological types and grades (Table/Fig 3): A significant association of PD-L1 expression with SCC (p=0.032) was found, but there was no significant association with the grades of tumours (p-value=0.065).

PD-L1 expression in histological types and grades of NSCLC (Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 6),(Table/Fig 7): Of the 35 NSCLC cases, 16 (45.70%) cases showed negative PD-L1 expression, 14 (40.0%) cases showed low positive expression, and 5 (14.30%) cases expressed high positivity.

Of the 13 ADC cases, 7 (53.8%) cases and 6 (46.2%) cases showed negative and low positive expression, respectively, with no cases showed high positive expression. Among the 21 SCC cases, 9 (42.9%) cases, 8 (38.1%%) cases, and 4 (19.0%) cases showed negative, low, and high positive expression, respectively.

In terms of overall grading, 6 (17.14%) cases were Grade 1, 17 (48.57%) cases were Grade 2, and 12 (34.29%) cases were Grade 3. Of the Grade 1 cases, 3 (50%) cases each were negative and low positive. There were no high positive ADC cases. Of the Grade 2 cases, 5 (29.5%) cases, 9 (52.9%) cases, and 3 (17.6%) cases showed negative, low positive, and high positive PD-L1 expression, respectively. Of the 12 Grade 3 cases, 8 (66.6%) cases exhibited negative expression, while 2 (16.7%) cases each expressed low and high positive PD-L1 expression.

Of the 13 cases of ADC, 6 (46.15%) cases each were classified as Grade 1 and Grade 2, while 1 (7.7%) case was Grade 3. The single case of Grade 3 ADC showed negative PD-L1 expression. Out of the six cases of both Grade 1 and Grade 2 ADC, three cases each (50%) showed negative and low positive expression.

Of the 21 cases of SCC, there were no Grade 1 cases. Among the 11 cases in Grade 2, 2 (18.1%) cases displayed negative PD-L1 expression, 6 (54.5%) cases showed low positive expression, and 3 (27.2%) cases exhibited high positive expression. Of the 10 cases of Grade 3 SCC, 7 (70.0%) cases expressed negative PD-L1, 2 (20.0%) cases had low positive expression, and 1 (10.0%) case showed high positive expression. One case of adenosquamous carcinoma demonstrated high positive PD-L1 expression (Table/Fig 8).

Discussion

In the present era of personalised medicine, small biopsies and cytology samples play a crucial role in the diagnosis, management, as well as prioritisation of tumour material for multiple predictive biomarker testing in NSCLC.

The body’s immune system plays an essential role in regulating tumour growth. Immunotherapy harnesses the specificity and long-term memory of the adaptive immune response, which causes durable regression of tumour cells and potentially achieving a cure (13). Immunocompromised patients are at an increased risk of developing cancer (14). The emergence of immune checkpoint blockers has revolutionised the treatment of various advanced malignancies. The treatment of inoperable and locally advanced NSCLC had not seen significant improvements for decades until, in 2016, the phase III trial led to the FDA’s approval of Pembrolizumab as a frontline treatment for NSCLC with high positive PD-L1 expression (15). Subsequently, the PACIFIC trial for stage III NSCLC has revolutionised the use of Durvalumab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, as maintenance therapy after coeval chemoradiotherapy (16),(17). This has spurred great interest in research into the PD-L1 pathway (16),(17).

The PD-L1 pathway is a crucial mechanism for immune escape by Tumour-infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) in NSCLC (18),(19). The blockade of immune checkpoints is the most commonly used predictor, assessed by PD-L1 expression in tumour cells for advanced NSCLC. The correlation between PD-L1 expression and clinicoradiological parameters is little known (20),(21).

Most patients in the present study were under the age of 60 (54.3%). Sahin S et al., found similar results in their study, with 51% of cases being below 60 years of age. The present study identified 68.6% of cases as male (22). Sahin S et al., and Kim H et al., also found similar findings in their studies, with 88.5% and 62.4% male patients, respectively (22),(23). The authors found a statistically significant association between PD-L1 expression and male sex (p=0.019).

In the present study, the association of NSCLC was more prevalent in chronic smokers (45.7%) followed by non smokers (42.9%). The correlation between PD-L1 expression and smoking status was statistically significant, with a p-value of 0.046. The present study revealed that SCC was the most common subtype with 21 cases (60.0%), followed by Adenocarcinoma (ADC) with 11 cases (37.14%), and only one case of adenosquamous carcinoma. Studies by Sahin S et al., and Schmidt LH et al., showed that the majority of cases were SCC (51.4%) followed by ADC (46.0%) (22),(24).

Overall, PD-L1 expression was observed in 19 cases (54.3%), out of which five cases (14.3%) showed high positivity (≥50%) and 16 cases (45.7%) were negative. This is consistent with findings by Jain E et al., who found the majority of cases (53.2%) to have positive PD-L1 expression (25). In the present study, 57.1% of SCC cases showed positive PD-L1 staining, similar to the studies Sahin S et al., (22). We found a significant correlation between PD-L1 expression and SCC, with a p-value of 0.032.

For ADC, 53.8% showed negative PD-L1 expression, and 46.2% showed low positive expression, with no cases exhibiting high positivity. In contrast, in SCC, 42.9% were negative, 38.1% had low positive expression, and 19.0% had high positive expression. The single case of adenosquamous carcinoma expressed high positivity. These findings are in line with those of Kim H et al., who noted that the majority of ADC cases (83.8%) were negative, followed by 10.1% with low positivity and only 6.1% with high positivity (23). They also found that the majority of SCC cases (74.8%) were negative, with 15.3% being low positive and 9.9% high positive.

Regarding the overall grading among all NSCLC subtypes, the authors observed 6 (17.14%) cases in Grade 1, 17 (48.57%) cases in Grade 2, and 12 (34.29%) cases in Grade 3. This distribution is similar to the findings of Dix Junqueira Pinto G et al., who reported the most cases (45.8%) in Grade 2, followed by (28.2%) in Grade 3, and the fewest cases (2.8%) in Grade 1 (26). Of the 13 ADC cases in the present study, 6 (46.15%) cases were Grade 1, 6 (46.15%) cases were Grade 2, and 1 (7.7%) case was Grade 3. For SCC, 11 (52.4%) cases were Grade 2, 10 (47.6%) cases were Grade 3, with no cases in Grade 1.

In the present study, the authors did not find a significant correlation between PD-L1 expression and other parameters like age, tumour location, and tumour grade.

Limitation(s)

The present study was limited by the small number of cases. A further prospective study with a larger sample size, along with analysis of other molecular indices like ALK, ROS-1, EGFR, etc., using an independently collected cohort, is necessary to validate the authors approach.

Conclusion

The PD-L1 expression by different tumours, including NSCLC, is one of the most predictive biomarkers investigated in the present era. This has benefited the use of immune checkpoint blockers in advanced NSCLC, causing higher treatment response rates and increased disease-free survival. The present study showed significant association of PD-L1 expression with male sex, chronic smoking, and SCC. There was no significant association with other clinicopathological parameters like age, tumour location, histological types, and grades. Additional studies with larger sample sizes are needed to establish this as a reliable and dynamic predictive biomarker.

References

1.
Takada K, Toyokawa G, Shoji F, Okamoto T, Maehara Y. The significance of the PD-L1 expression in non-small-cell lung cancer: Trenchant double swords as predictive and prognostic markers. Clin Lung Cancer. 2018;19:120-29. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-49. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Unit IB. ICMR-National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research Bangaluru.
4.
Indian Council of Medical Research; 2013. National Cancer Registry Programme. Three Year Report of Population Based Cancer Registries: 2009 2011.
5.
Gupta N, Sekar A, Rajwanshi A. Role of FNAC. Fluid specimens, and cell blocks for cytological diagnosis of lung cancer in the present era. J Cytol. 2015;32(4):217 22. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Nicholson AG, Tsao MS, Beasley MB, Borczuk AC, Brambilla E, Cooper WA, et al. The 2021 WHO classification of lung tumours: Impact of advances since 2015. J Thorac Oncol. 2022;17(3):362-87. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N, Aster JC. Robbins and cotran pathologic basis of disease. 8th Ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier. 2010:01-02.
8.
Postow MA, Callahan MK, Wolchok JD. Immune checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(17):1974-82. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Topalian SL, Hodi FS, Brahmer JR, Gettinger SN, Smith DC, McDermott DF, et al. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(26):2443-54.[crossref][PubMed]
10.
Spranger S, Spaapen RM, Zha Y, Williams J, Meng Y, Ha TT, et al. Up-regulation of PD-L1, IDO, and T(regs) in the melanoma tumour microenvironment is driven by CD8(+) T cells. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(200):116-200. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, Spigel DR, Steins M, Ready NE, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(17):1627-39. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Garg G, Prasad KT, Singh N, Gupta P, Muthu V, Das A, et al. Programmed death- ligand 1 expression and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in non-small cell lung cancer: Association with clinicopathologic parameters. J Pathol Transl Med. 2021;55(6):398-405. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Disis ML. Mechanism of action of immunotherapy. Sem in Oncol. 2014;41 Suppl 5:03-13. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Kasiske BL, Snyder JJ, Gilbertson DT, Wang C. Cancer after kidney transplantation in the United State. Am J Transplant. 2004;4(6):905-13. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, Hui R, Csöszi T, Fülöp A, et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1- positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1823-33. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, Vicente D, Murakami S, Hui R, et al. Overall survival with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(24):2342-50. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Gray JE, Villegas A, Daniel D, Vicente D, Murakami S, Hui R, et al. Three-year overall survival with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC-update from Pacific. J Thorac Oncol. 2020;15(2):288-93. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Casaluce F, Sgambato A, Sacco PC, Palazzolo G, Maione P, Rossi A, et al. Emerging drugs targeting PD-1 and PD-L1: Reality or hope? Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2014;19(4):557-69. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Domingues D, Turner A, Silva MD, Marques DS, Mellidez JC, Wannesson L, et al. Immunotherapy and lung cancer: Current developments and novel targeted therapies. Immunotherapy. 2014;6(11):1221-35. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Garon EB, Rizvi NA, Hui R, Leighl N, Balmanoukian AS, Paul J, et al. Pembrolizumab for the treatment of none small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(21):2018-28. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, Felip E, Pérez-Gracia JL, Han JY, et al. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced none small-cell lung cancer (Keynote-010): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10027):1540-50. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Sahin S, Batur S, Aydin Ö, Öztürk T, Turna A, Öz B. Programmed Death- Ligand-1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer and prognosis. Balkan Med J. 2019;36(3):184-89. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Kim H, Kwon HJ, Park SY, Park Y, Park E, Chung JH. Clinicopathological analysis and prognostic significance of programmed cell death-ligand 1 protein and mRNA expression in non-small cell lung cancer. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(6):e0198634. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Schmidt LH, Kümmel A, Görlich D, Mohr M, Bröckling S, Mikesch JH, et al. PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in NSCLC indicate a favourable prognosis in defined subgroups. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(8):136-46. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Jain E, Sharma S, Aggarwal A, Bhardwaj N, Dewan A, Kumar A, et al. PD-L1 expression and its clinicopathologic and genomic correlation in the non-small cell lung carcinoma patients. Pathol Res Pract. 2021;228:153497. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Dix Junqueira Pinto G, de Souza Viana L, ScapulatempoNeto C, Vicente Serrano SJ. Evaluation of PD-L1 expression in tumour tissue of patients with lung carcinoma and correlation with clinical and demographic data. J Immunol Res. 2016;2016:9839685.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/63359.19114

Date of Submission: Feb 09, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Mar 31, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Dec 30, 2023
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 24, 2023
• Manual Googling: Aug 15, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Dec 27, 2023 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com