Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 169007

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2024 | Month : March | Volume : 18 | Issue : 3 | Page : DR01 - DR04 Full Version

Raoultella ornithinolytica : A Case Series of Clinical Presentations and its Role in Various Infections from a Tertiary Care Centre in Tumkur, Karnataka, India


Published: March 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/67516.19192
Rashmi Belodu, BV Renushri, TS Kiran, G Vijayakumar

1. Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Siddaganga Medical College and Research Institute, Tumakuru, Karnataka, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, Siddaganga Medical College and Research Institute, Tumakuru, Karnataka, India. 3. Professor, Department of Microbiology, Siddaganga Medical College and Research Institute, Tumakuru, Karnataka, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Siddaganga Medical College and Research Institute, Tumakuru, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Rashmi Belodu,
c/o Department of Microbiology, Siddaganga Medical College and Research Institute, Tumakuru-572102, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: drbrashmi@gmail.com

Abstract

Raoultella ornithinolytica (R. ornithinolytica), a Gram-negative bacillus, has characteristics resembling those of Klebsiella spp. This bacterium is present in soil and aquatic environments and seldom causes Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs). However, clinical features and outcomes of human infections caused by R. ornithinolytica have been reported for only a limited number of cases. Here, multiple cases of adult patients with clinical features of community-acquired infections at different body sites are presented. R. ornithinolytica was identified in the laboratory from respective samples sent for culture and sensitivity. These patients were treated with good outcomes. R. ornithinolytica is a saprophyte known to cause secondary infections in patients with risk factors and sometimes exhibits antibiotic resistance. However, all the patients presented to the institution recovered fully from the infections and were discharged.

Keywords

Community-acquired, Multidrug resistance, Wound infection

Raoultella ornithinolytica is a capsulated, non motile Gram-negative bacterium, which was previously named as Klebsiella ornithinolytica. However, in 2001, it was renamed Raoultella, along with other Klebsiella species, based on 16S rRNA and rpoB gene analysis (1),(2). R. ornithinolytica is found in water, soil, plants, and occasionally in animals (1),(2). In humans, the bacterium causes a variety of infections. While Hospital-Acquired Infections (HAI) is widely reported (2),(3),(4),(5), it also causes infections in children, newborns, and fatal infections in premature babies (6). In the elderly and those with underlying chronic diseases and malignant tumours, secondary infections with R. ornithinolytica are common during hospitalisation or following invasive procedures (4),(5),(6). However, soft-tissue infections and wound infections have shown good recovery in healthy, young individuals with appropriate timely treatment (7). Rarely, R. ornithinolytica infections have been reported as community-acquired infections and in healthy individuals, in enteric fever-like infections, and urinary tract infections (8),(9). R. ornithinolytica shows sensitivity to most antibiotic classes as reported in the literature (9). Susceptibility has been observed to different classes of antibiotics like cephalosporins, sulphonamides, aminoglycosides, quinolones, combination of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors, carbapenems, and carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (10). However, they exhibit intrinsic resistance to ampicillin and ticarcillin due to chromosomally encoded beta-lactamases (10). Strains exhibiting extended-spectrum beta-lactamases belonging to the SHV, TEM, and CTX-M have been reported in the literature, as well as AmpC production. Carbapenem resistance has also been described in other studies (11),(12).

Case Report

Case 1

A 29-year-old healthy female adult without any co-morbidities was admitted to the surgical department with complaints of a large non healing ulcer on the dorsum of the left foot and ankle (Table/Fig 1), with a history of a snake bite to the left ankle while working in an agricultural field one month prior. On examination, her vitals were stable, with no other complaints. Routine blood examination on admission was normal. A pus sample from the wound was sent for culture and sensitivity, which showed the growth of grey, non haemolytic mucoid colonies on blood agar and lactose-fermenting mucoid colonies on MacConkey agar (Table/Fig 2), subsequently identified as R. ornithinolytica by the automated VITEK 2 compact systemTM by Biomerieux. The isolate was sensitive to aminoglycosides, quinolones, sulphonamides, cephalosporins, carbapenems, combinations of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors, and carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations.

The patient was diagnosed with an ulcer on the dorsum of the left foot and ankle with a wound infection secondary to a snake bite. She was started on Inj. Diclofenac 75 mg i.v. and Injection Cefixime 500 mg i.v. BD, which was continued for 10 days. Nutritional and protein supplements were added to her diet. She was transfused with one unit of packed Red Blood Cells (RBC) to correct her anaemia. In addition to vacuum suction for the removal of pus, daily dressing was started. Skin grafting was postponed in view of the culture report and the pus discharge from the wound. The patient responded gradually to the treatment, wound care, and daily dressings. The patient was advised to continue admission until most of the wound had developed granulation and pus was very minimal, which lasted for about three weeks. A repeat pus sample from the wound site was sent for culture and sensitivity, which resulted in no growth. Split skin grafting was postponed in view of the healing wound and to be decided in follow-up. She was advised regular wound care and dressing at a healthcare facility and for follow-up in the surgical outpatient department as per her request. She was advised skin grafting following the resolution of the infection and ulcer.

Case 2

A 59-year-old gentleman, known case of diabetes mellitus type 2 for the last 15 years, and previously operated for craniopharyngioma, presented to the emergency department with complaints of altered sensorium and loose stools, along with dyselectrolytemia. The patient also exhibited clinical features of acute renal injury, presenting as oliguria and fatigue, which was confirmed with serum creatinine levels of 1.4 mg/dL, leading to his admission to the ward. On admission, he was found to be febrile, with a temperature of 39oC. However, he was normotensive, and there were no abnormal findings in the cardiovascular system, respiratory system, or per abdominal examination. Blood samples sent for analysis showed high potassium levels and increased procalcitonin (1.45 ng/mL). Haemoglobin was within normal limits, and total counts were elevated. A 2D Echo showed no abnormalities. Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) was sent for complete analysis and culture sensitivity. However, CSF, blood, and urine samples showed no growth in culture. A stool sample was sent to the microbiology laboratory for culture and sensitivity due to loose stools and continued increased temperature. The processed stool sample showed growth of mucoid lactose-fermenting colonies (Table/Fig 2) in MacConkey agar and was processed using the automated VITEK 2 compact systemTM by Biomerieux for identification and susceptibility pattern. The isolate was identified as R. ornithinolytica susceptible to aminoglycosides, quinolones, sulphonamides, cephalosporins, carbapenems, combinations of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor, and carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. The patient was diagnosed with acute gastroenteritis with dyselectrolytemia. Treatment was started with Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Metronidazole for three days in the intensive care unit initially, followed by Injection meropenem 500 mg for three days, Injection doxycycline 100 mg, and with probiotics, zinc, and vitamins for the correction of electrolytes. The patient improved significantly in the next three days with no other complications or complaints and was discharged.

Case 3

A 47-year-old lady, known to have type 2 diabetes mellitus for 10 years, presented to the outpatient department with swelling of the left foot and left ankle joint pain for three days. On examination, she was febrile, with a temperature of 38oC, and had features of left sole necrotising fasciitis and left big toe swelling and gangrene. She was admitted to the surgery department and advised surgical treatment of the left foot. Blood samples were collected appropriately for tests, which showed impaired blood glucose levels of 220 mg/dL, elevated Alkaline phosphatase levels of 150 IU/L, and elevated serum creatinine of 1.3 mg/dL. Ultrasonography of the abdomen showed no other abnormalities. She underwent surgical treatment with amputation of the left big toe of the left foot and debridement and drainage of pus. The pus sample was sent for culture and sensitivity, and R. ornithinolytica (Table/Fig 2) was identified and isolated in culture using Vitek 2 and tested by the Gram-negative panel simultaneously. The isolate was found to be sensitive to aminoglycosides, quinolones, sulphonamides, cephalosporins, carbapenems, combinations of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor, and carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations.

She was diagnosed with left foot necrotising fasciitis with gangrene. Subsequently, she was treated with Injection clindamycin 600 mg i.v. and piperacillin-tazobactam 2.25 g i.v., and appropriate anti-inflammatory medication, as well as treatment for glycaemic control. She was medically treated with wound care and showed significant improvement in the left foot and her general condition, and was discharged. She followed-up in the outpatient department under surgical care, and a repeat sample of the pus collected in the outpatient department yielded no growth.

Case 4

A 74-year-old male patient who was not diabetic or hypertensive, and had no other significant complaints presented to the outpatient department with complaints of burning micturition and fever for two days. Upon presenting at the outpatient department, blood samples were collected and sent for biochemical evaluation and fever assessment. The blood biochemistry results were within normal limits. Blood tests showed negative results for malaria, typhoid, or dengue. A urine sample collected on an outpatient basis was sent for culture and sensitivity testing. The patient was started on empirical treatment with fluoroquinolones and appropriate hydration, with advice to follow-up in the outpatient department. The urine culture showed significant growth of mucoid lactose-fermenting colonies (Table/Fig 2) on MacConkey agar, identified as R. ornithinolytica by the Vitek 2 automated system and tested for the antimicrobial resistance pattern by the Gram-negative panel. The isolate was found to be sensitive to aminoglycosides, quinolones, sulphonamides, cephalosporins, carbapenems, combinations of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor, and carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. He was diagnosed as a case of community-acquired urinary tract infection. The patient followed-up in the outpatient department and was advised to continue with the same treatment for a total of 10 days, with appropriate supportive treatment. During follow-up, the patient had no other complaints, and the symptoms had subsided. He was compliant with the treatment.

Discussion

Between the 1980s and 2006, only four cases of human Raoultella infection were reported. However, this has steadily increased, and up to 2022, around 130 cases have been reported in the literature (13). R. ornithinolytica causing infections has emerged globally, with an overall increasing incidence trend. Raoultella infections have been reported in immunocompromised individuals, the elderly, and those with risk factors such as preexisting diseases (5). In India, cases of neonatal sepsis and subhepatic abscess have been reported (14),(15). However, a preliminary search for case reports or studies on R. ornithinolytica in Medline, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases revealed no results from the region of South India. Among community acquired infections of R. ornithinolytica, diabetic foot infections, paronychia, and other soft-tissue infections have been reported as co-morbid conditions (16). A review by Seng P et al., of R. ornithinolytica infections showed that 51% of 112 cases were community-acquired. Among these, 25% involved were immunocompromised individuals, and 25% were associated with concurrent malignancy, with diabetes mellitus present in 22% of cases (5). Risk factors such as these and extremes of age are important determinants of an individual’s susceptibility.

In the cases included here, patients residing in different locations surrounding the city presented to the hospital with various complaints. They were treated by doctors in different specialties and admitted in different wards, with no overlap in their time of stay or common environment in the hospital. Standard infection control practices, including hand hygiene and environmental disinfection, were followed in the wards. Segregation of the patients was implemented in the case of snake bites due to extensive wounds. However, clonal relatedness was not tested, and this was a limitation of this case series.

Community-acquired infections by Raoultella are rare, considering that most reported cases in the literature are hospital-acquired. The Genus Raoultella closely resembles Klebsiella spp, and accurate identification by automation or conventional methods is important for diagnosis. By conventional methods of identification, Raoultella are Gram-negative capsulated bacilli, non fastidious, lactose fermenters, with mucoid colonies on MacConkey’s agar, catalase positive, oxidase negative with indole and Methyl Red (MR) positive, and can be differentiated into species with ornithine decarboxylase positive reaction (10). Raoultella spp. are intrinsically resistant to ampicillin, and identification of the genus helps in guiding treatment. Currently, in the reported cases, the strains were sensitive and resolved with treatment. However, multidrug-resistant Raoultella are emerging, requiring alertness in diagnosis, proactive treatment, and vigilance of resistance patterns. The pathogenicity of the bacterium is attributed to its ability to form biofilms, polysaccharide capsules, siderophores, and fimbriae, as well as the presence of the chromosomal bla gene, which has been postulated to give it resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, including penicillins (17).

Raoultella species have been reported to cause an enteric fever-like syndrome, gastroenteritis, pancreatitis, cholangitis, hepatic abscess, acute cholecystitis, and peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis (15),(18),(19). In case 2 the continued fever with diarrhoea with culture negative samples prompted the investigation into the stool sample and further identification of the isolate. Furthermore, all isolates here were sensitive to aminoglycosides, quinolones, sulphonamides, cephalosporins, carbapenems, combinations of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor, and carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitor. In patients, co-morbidities and risk factors reported in the literature include cancer, post-urethral trauma, and post-invasive procedures (5).

The various risk factors and outcomes in different cases have been consolidated in (Table/Fig 3) (2),(3),(4),(6),(14),(15),(18),(20).

Conclusion

R. ornithinolytica poses difficulties in identification when using conventional methods and infections in humans may be underestimated. Automated systems have improved identification and implication in infections. Various risk factors in patients contribute to the susceptibility of the individual to infection, and community-acquired infections are common. However, there is a difficulty in assigning a pathogenic role especially in stool sample and with cases of diarrhoea. All the strains were sensitive to different classes of antibiotics tested. In the cases presented here, it is noteworthy that R. ornithinolytica showed susceptibility to most antibiotics tested and had a good response to treatment in the patients, as well as good outcomes.

References

1.
Drancourt M, Bollet C, Carta A, Rousselier P. Phylogenetic analyses of Klebsiella species delineate Klebsiella and Raoultella gen. nov., with description of Raoultella ornithinolytica comb. nov., Raoultella terrigena comb. nov. and Raoultella planticola comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001;51(3):925-32. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Se?kowska A, Dylewska K, Gospodarek E, Bogiel T. Catheter-related blood stream infection caused by Raoultella ornithinolytica. Folia Microbiologica. 2015;60(6):493-95. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Kabbara WK, Zgheib YR. Diabetic foot infection caused by Raoultella ornithinolytica. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015;72(24):2147-49. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Hadano Y, Tsukahara M, Ito K, Suzuki J, Kawamura I, Kurai H. Raoultella ornithinolytica bacteremia in cancer patients: Report of three cases. Intern Med. 2012;51(22):3193-95. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Seng P, Boushab BM, Romain F, Gouriet F, Bruder N, Martin C, et al. Emerging role of Raoultella ornithinolytica in human infections: A series of cases and review of the literature. Int J Infect Dis. 2016;45:65-71. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Ozkan EA, Khosroshahi HE, Yilmaz N, Gecit UA, Domur E. A rare case of a newborn with urinary tract infection by Raoultella ornithinolytica. Am J Health Res. 2014;2(6):375-77.[crossref]
7.
Ayoade F, Mada PK, Alam M. Fat necrosis and polymicrobial wound infection caused partly by Raoultella ornithinolytica after reduction mammoplasty. Case Reports. 2018;2018:bcr-2018. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
BRyRkcam A, Bišakšigil A, Kara A, Sancak B. A case of Raoultella ornithinolytica urinary tract infection in a pediatric patient. J Infect Chemother. 2019;25(6):467-69. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Morais VP, Daporta MT, Bao AF, Campello MG, Andrés GQ. Enteric fever-like syndrome caused by Raoultella ornithinolytica (Klebsiella ornithinolytica). J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(3):868-69. Doi: 10.1128/JCM.01709-08. Epub 2009 Jan 14. PMID: 19144809; PMCID: PMC2650892. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Hajjar R, Ambaraghassi G, Sebajang H, Schwenter F, Su SH. Raoultella ornithinolytica: Emergence and resistance. Infection and Drug Resistance. 2020;15:1091-104. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Zurfluh K, Hächler H, Nüesch-Inderbinen M, Stephan R. Characteristics of extended- spectrum β-lactamase-and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates from rivers and lakes in Switzerland. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79(9):3021-26. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Abid IN. Emergence of Raoultella ornithinolytica producing AmpC-beta-lactamases in the different clinical specimens. J Nat Res Sci. 2016;6:124-29.
13.
Appel TM, Quijano-Martínez N, De La Cadena E, Mojica MF, Villegas MV. Microbiological and Clinical Aspects of Raoultella spp. Front Public Health. 2021,2;9:686789. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Abbas A, Ahmad I. First report of neonatal early-onset sepsis caused by multi- drug-resistant Raoultella ornithinolytica. Infection. 2018;46(2):275-77. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Bhatt P, Tandel K, Das NK, Rathi KR. New Delhi metallo- β-lactamase producing extensively drug-resistant Raoultella ornithinolytica isolated from drain fluid following Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy. Med J Armed Forces India. 2015;71(Suppl2):S609-11. Doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Mar 12. PMID: 26858504; PMCID: PMC4705201. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Solak Y, Gul EE, Atalay H, Genc N, Tonbul HZ. A rare human infection of Raoultella ornithinolytica in a diabetic foot lesion. Ann Saudi Med. 2011;31(1):93-94. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Riwu KH, Effendi MH, Rantam FA, Khairullah AR, Widodo A. A review: Virulence factors of Klebsiella pneumonia as emerging infection on the food chain. Veterinary World. 2022;15(9):2172. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Sibanda M. Primary peritonitis caused by Raoultella ornithinolytica in a 53-year-old man. JMM Case Reports. 2014;1(3):e002634. [crossref]
19.
Goggins A, Lykins J, Aston A, Shaw J. Acute cholecystitis secondary to Raoultella ornithinolytica infection, complicated by sepsis, gallbladder perforation, hepatic abscess and bacteraemia. BMJ Case Reports CP. 2022;15(12):e250766. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Chen X, Zhou X, Cao J, Ma K, Xia Z. A case report of community-acquired Raoultella ornithinolytica infection in a healthy, young individual. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):1095.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/67516.19192

Date of Submission: Sep 14, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Nov 09, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jan 10, 2024
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 15, 2023
• Manual Googling: Nov 18, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jan 08, 2024 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com