Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 259076

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : March | Volume : 18 | Issue : 3 | Page : DC16 - DC19 Full Version

An Outbreak of Ralstonia mannitolilytica Septicaemia at a Tertiary Care Hospital: An Observational Cross-sectional Study


Published: March 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/64415.19200
Nidhi Bhatnagar, Shruthi Vasanth, Nidhi Tejan, Chinmoy Sahu

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Mayo Institute of Medical Sciences, Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. 4. Additional Professor, Department of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Chinmoy Sahu,
Additional Professor, Department of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow-226014, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: sahu.chinmoy@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Ralstonia spp. is an emerging non fermenting Gram negative bacillus implicated in cases of bloodstream infections in immunocompromised individuals. It is commonly found as an environmental contaminant in hospital settings. Several sporadic outbreaks have been reported from different parts of the world due to Ralstonia spp. This study reports a similar outbreak at a tertiary care hospital in Northern India.

Aim: To determine the source of Ralstonia septicaemia in affected patients at a tertiary care centre.

Materials and Methods: The present observational cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India from February 2020 until the end of March 2020 (two months). A total of 2,650 blood cultures were received during the study period; of these, 53 (2%) patients were found to have Ralstonia mannitolilytica infection over a two month period. All patients from various wards whose blood cultures showed growth of Ralstonia species were included in this study. The organism was identified using both biochemical tests and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Antibiotic sensitivity testing was conducted using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion assay. Environmental surveillance was conducted to detect the source of origin. Patients’ age, sex, duration of hospital stay, co-morbidities, and other clinical parameters were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel.

Results: There were 52 cases of septicaemia due to Ralstonia mannitolilytica, and one Ralstonia isolate was obtained from intraoperative pus. Most of the Ralstonia isolates obtained were Multidrug-Resistant (MDR), showing resistance to imipenem, meropenem, amikacin, aztreonam, and sensitivity to first-line drugs such as ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefoperazone-sulbactam, levofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, resulting in successful treatment. Out of 53 cases, one patient succumbed to death due to surgical complications. Environmental sampling did not yield any organisms resembling Ralstonia spp.

Conclusion: The environmental source of the Ralstonia bacteraemia outbreak could not be identified in this study. All patients except one were successfully treated with antibiotics. Clinicians and microbiologists should remain vigilant in case any such case arises to prevent further outbreaks.

Keywords

Emerging, Multidrug resistance, Non fermenter, Nosocomial, Surveillance

Ralstonia spp. are a group of Non Fermenting Gram Negative Bacilli (NFGNB) that have emerged as a major cause of opportunistic infections in recent decades, particularly among the immunocompromised population. The three important species known to cause disease in humans are Ralstonia pickettii, Ralstonia insidiosa, and Ralstonia mannitolilytica (1),(2). They are ubiquitous environmental contaminants, commonly found in hospital settings (1),(2),(3). Ralstonia spp. have been identified as contaminants in solutions such as sterile water, intravenous medications, skin disinfectants, blood culture bottles, and saline solutions used in hospitals for patient treatment (4),(5). There have been reports of pseudo-outbreaks, where the solutions used for the identification of the organisms were contaminated by these bacteria, leading to false-positive reports (6),(7). These organisms tend to produce biofilms on various intravascular devices and have been implicated in causing various nosocomial infections; they are usually resistant to multiple antibiotics (8). With the advent of MALDI-TOF MS and other automated identification systems, there has been an increased detection of this organism, which was under-reported in earlier times. Sporadic outbreaks have been reported from different parts of the world (1),(2),(4),(5). This study reports an outbreak of Ralstonia mannitolilytica septicaemia at a tertiary care centre in Northern India that occurred just before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The outbreak subsided soon after various wards were closed due to COVID-19. The aim of the study was to determine the source of Ralstonia septicaemia in the affected individuals at a tertiary care centre. The clinical characteristics of the patients, the antibiotic treatment given for Ralstonia bacteraemia, and the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the Ralstonia mannitolilytica isolates were also studied in detail as objectives of the study.

Material and Methods

This observational cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, from February 2020 until the end of March 2020 (a period of two months). Out of the 2,650 blood cultures received during the study period, 53 (2%) patients were found to have Ralstonia mannitolilytica infection. This was a time-bound study; hence the samples available in the study duration were taken into consideration.

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee (PGI/BE/224/2020). All patients from whom BACTEC blood culture bottle sets (consisting of one aerobic and one anaerobic bottle) were received in the bacteriology laboratory and tested positive for Ralstonia spp. were included in the study. The identification of Ralstonia species was performed using colony morphology, biochemical tests such as the oxidase test, and MALDI-TOF MS (Biomerieux, France).

Inclusion criteria: Only the first Ralstonia isolate from the blood culture of each patient was included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Any repeat Ralstonia spp. isolates from the blood cultures of the same patients were excluded from the study.

Patients’ demographic features and clinical records were obtained from their medical files and entered into a proforma. All medical records were thoroughly analysed to identify any common surgical procedures or interventions that could have posed a risk for Ralstonia species infection. The mean age, duration of hospital stay, procalcitonin levels, and Total Leukocyte Counts (TLC) were calculated. The percentages of patients with various co-morbid conditions and the results of antibiotic susceptibility tests were also measured.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST): Manual AST was performed on all Ralstonia spp. culture isolates using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (9). Mueller-Hinton Agar (MHA) was used for susceptibility testing. Antibiotic disks were procured from Himedia Laboratories, Mumbai. The disks used included ceftazidime, levofloxacin/ciprofloxacin, imipenem, meropenem, amikacin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, aztreonam, doxycycline, and cefoperazone-sulbactam (1). Testing for Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) was not performed; only the disk diffusion test was conducted. Since there are no CLSI clinical breakpoints for Ralstonia species, the results were interpreted according to the CLSI M-100 2019 guidelines for Pseudomonas spp. (8),(9). P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and E. coli ATCC 25922 were used as control strains for AST.

Surveillance sampling: Infection control nurses collected environmental samples from different wards from which the majority of Ralstonia spp. isolates were obtained after five days from the first case. Commercially available sterile swabs were used to collect samples from patients’ immediate surroundings, such as bed rails, intravenous sets, and intravenous cannulas. Samples from unused sterile intravenous fluids, liquid soaps, and disinfectants (70% chlorhexidine, alcohol) in use were also collected in sterile universal containers. Drinking water (from reverse osmosis systems) and tap water were collected in sterile containers as well. Dialysis water was obtained from the dialysis unit. Air bioload assessments were conducted using a sieve impactor (10).

Processing of environmental samples: Swabs were incubated in Brain-Heart Infusion (BHI) media at 37°C for 18-24 hours. After 24 hours, the BHI media were visually inspected for any turbidity or growth. A small volume of the sample was then taken with an inoculating loop and subcultured onto blood and MacConkey agar plates. These culture plates were further incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. Any positive growth was subsequently identified using Gram staining and appropriate biochemical tests.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel, and the data were analysed using descriptive statistics.

Results

A total of 2,650 blood cultures were received during the study period, of which 53 (2%) patients were found to have Ralstonia mannitolilytica infections over a two month period. The colonies of Ralstonia mannitolilytica on blood agar were grey, moist, and round to oval, measuring 1-2 mm in diameter. On MacConkey agar, as shown in (Table/Fig 1), there were round to oval, non-lactose fermenting colonies with entire margins, measuring about 2×1 mm. Biochemically, they were catalase positive, oxidase positive, and urease positive. They did not reduce nitrate to nitrite and acidified glucose and lactose but did not produce acid from sucrose. The final identification was performed using MALDI-TOF MS (Biomerieux, France).

One case was identified from intraoperative pus, specifically from a splenic abscess. The remaining 52 strains were isolated from BACTEC blood cultures. Of the 53 patients, 33 (62.26%) were males and 20 (37.74%) were females. All patients presented with febrile episodes during their admission. The highest number of cases originated from the Nephrology, Emergency, and Surgical Gastroenterology (SGE) wards. The distribution of cases from different wards is shown in (Table/Fig 2).

The medical records of all patients were thoroughly investigated. A total of 33 patients (62.26%) were found to have different types of Central Venous Catheters (CVCs). (Table/Fig 3) presents the various types of intravenous catheters found in 53 patients with Ralstonia mannitolilytica septicaemia. Fourteen patients (26.4%), who were receiving haemodialysis, had both Arteriovenous (AV) fistula and peripheral venous catheters.

The clinical details of the patients are shown in (Table/Fig 4). The mean age of the patients was 47.17 years. The most common co-morbidities found were diabetes and hypertension. The procalcitonin and TLC levels were found to be elevated in most of the patients.

Empirical antibiotics were initiated for all patients based on their clinical presentations and were de-escalated following the culture and antibiotic susceptibility reports. Antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed that all isolates were resistant to amikacin, meropenem, imipenem, ticarcillin-clavulanate, and aztreonam. The most effective drugs were cefoperazone-sulbactam and levofloxacin. The antibiotic susceptibility pattern of all 53 isolates is shown in (Table/Fig 5).

Out of 53 patients, one patient died due to complications during surgery, while the remaining 52 patients recovered with appropriate antibiotic therapy. The mean time to the first subsequent negative blood culture was 11 days in these patients. Environmental sampling was conducted at various hospital sites. All environmental samples were found to be sterile. None of the surveillance samples grew Ralstonia spp. Therefore, the source of the outbreak could not be detected.

Discussion

During the current outbreak, 52 cases of Ralstonia mannitolilytica bacteraemia were observed, along with one case from intraoperative pus, specifically from a splenic abscess. Prior to this outbreak, the same institution reported only a few cases of Ralstonia, primarily in immunocompromised patients with conditions such as haematological malignancies, etc. However, the sudden increase in the number of Ralstonia cases has prompted urgent efforts to identify the source of the outbreak. The first case report of Ralstonia spp. in India was from this institute, involving a 14-year-old renal transplant recipient in 2003. The child was saved through prompt microbiological identification and appropriate antibiotic treatment (11). Subsequently, various isolated cases have been reported from India and globally (11),(12),(13),(14). Liu CX et al., reported three cases of Ralstonia mannitolilytica-induced septicaemia in 2016; all were postoperative, and the environmental source of origin was not identified (13).

Until the last decade, the most commonly isolated species from clinical specimens in reported cases was Ralstonia pickettii, but more recently, cases of Ralstonia mannitolilytica as well as Ralstonia insidiosa have emerged (15). In this study, all cases were due to Ralstonia mannitolilytica. Rajendran UD et al., recently reported an outbreak of Ralstonia mannitolilytica sepsis in a neonatal Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (16).

Ralstonia has been identified as a potential contaminant in various skin disinfectants, distilled water used in respiratory equipment, intravenous medications, blood culture bottles, heparinised syringes, and saline solutions in the hospital setting, due to its ability to grow in a wide range of temperatures (15°C to 42°C) (17),(18),(19). In a study by Lucarelli C et al., the replacement of multidose saline infusions used for CVC flushing with single-dose vials led to the control of a Ralstonia sepsis outbreak (20). The increased use of indwelling blood catheters and the organism’s propensity to produce biofilms have also contributed to a rise in infections by these less virulent pathogens (15). In this study, 33 (62.26%) patients had CVCs, and 14 (26.4%) patients had AV fistula for haemodialysis.

Ralstonia species are frequently resistant to various commonly used antibiotics, including β-lactams and most aminoglycosides (21). In this study, all isolates were resistant to carbapenems (imipenem and meropenem), amikacin, and ticarcillin-clavulanate. Empirical antibiotics were initiated for all patients based on their clinical presentation and subsequently de-escalated after receiving culture and antibiotic susceptibility reports. In this case, de-escalation to cefoperazone-sulbactam and levofloxacin was recommended to clinicians, as all Ralstonia isolates were sensitive to these drugs. Similarly, Ryan MP and Adley CC recommended quinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of Ralstonia species (21). In this study, 3 (6%) isolates were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. All patients survived except one, who died due to multiple surgical complications.

Environmental sampling was carried out at various sites within the hospital. However, all cultures were found to be sterile. The outbreak, which spread across various wards in the same building and involved patients presenting on different days upon admission, made it difficult to identify the source. Other authors have reported Ralstonia spp. outbreaks where the environmental source remained undetected (1),(20). The outbreak resolved on its own when patient admissions were halted due to the lockdown during the first COVID-19 pandemic. Hand hygiene, social distancing, and stringent sanitisation measures, adopted in response to COVID-19 cases, were major factors in the self-containment of the outbreak. This was not a pseudo-outbreak, as samples were collected from different wards/OPDs by different personnel. Additionally, sets of blood cultures were sent for each sample, and the same lot of blood culture bottles was used for other patients who had negative culture results during the same period.

Limitation(s)

Due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, detailed environmental sample surveillance could not be conducted across all wards. MICs were not tested, and epidemiological typing was not performed for the isolates due to financial constraints.

Conclusion

Ralstonia mannitolilytica is an emerging nosocomial pathogen with the ability to cause outbreaks in immunocompromised populations. The environmental source of origin could not be detected in this study. All patients, except one, were successfully treated with levofloxacin and cefoperazone-sulbactam. Keen suspicion by clinicians and microbiologists is required to take prompt action to prevent such outbreaks by removing environmental sources or contaminated medical solutions/devices.

References

1.
Ramani VK, Ganesha DV, Sarathy V, Bhattacharjee S, Ganeshan S, Naik R. Outbreak of Ralstonia mannitolilytica infection at a tertiary care oncology centre in South India: A case series. Asian Pac J Cancer Biol. 2021;6(1):87-92. [crossref]
2.
Basso M, Venditti C, Raponi G, Navazio AS, Alessandri F, Giombini E, et al. A case of persistent bacteraemia by Ralstonia mannitolilytica and Ralstonia pickettii in an intensive care unit. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:2391-95. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Stelzmueller I, Biebl M, Wiesmayr S, Eller M, Hoeller E, Fille M, et al. Ralstonia pickettii-innocent bystander or a potential threat? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12(2):99-101. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Chen YY, Huang WT, Chen CP, Sun SM, Kuo FM, Chan YJ, et al. An outbreak of Ralstonia pickettii bloodstream infection associated with an intrinsically contaminated normal saline solution. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017;38(4):444-48. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Demirdag TB, Ozkaya-Parlakay A, Bayrakdar F, Gulhan B, Yuksek SK, Yildiz SS, et al. An outbreak of Ralstonia pickettii bloodstream infection among pediatric leukemia patients. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2022;55(1):80-85. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Boutros N, Gonullu N, Casetta A, Guibert M, Ingrand D, Lebrun L. Ralstonia pickettii traced in blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(7):2666-67. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Heard S, Lawrence S, Holmes B, Costas M. A pseudo-outbreak of Pseudomonas on a special care baby unit. J Hosp Infect. 1990;16(1):59-65. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Said M, van Hougenhouck-Tulleken W, Naidoo R, Mbelle N, Ismail F. Outbreak of Ralstonia mannitolilytica bacteraemia in patients undergoing haemodialysis at a tertiary hospital in Pretoria, South Africa. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020;9(1):01-07. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
CLSI Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 29 th ed. CLSI supplement M100. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2019.
10.
Rastogi N, Khurana S, Veeraraghavan B, Inbanathan FY, Sekar SK, Gupta D, et al. Epidemiological investigation and successful management of a Burkholderia cepacia outbreak in a neurotrauma intensive care unit. Int J Infec Dis. 2019;79:04-11. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Mukhopadhyay C, Bhargava A, Ayyagari A. Ralstonia mannitolilytica infection in renal transplant recipient: First report. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2003;21(4):284-86. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Papagrigorakis E, Vavourakis M, Vlachos C, Zachariou D, Galanis A, Marougklianis V, et al. Osteomyelitis caused by Ralstonia mannitolilytica, a rare opportunistic pathogen. Cureus. 2022;14(4):e24151. [crossref]
13.
Liu CX, Yan C, Zhang P, Li FQ, Yang JH, Li XY. Ralstonia mannitolilytica-induced septicaemia and homology analysis in infected patients: 3 case reports. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2016;9(7):e34373. [crossref]
14.
Zhou S, Tang D, Wei S, Hu Z, Wang X, Luo D. Ralstonia mannitolilytica sepsis after elective cesarean delivery: A case report. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):01-04. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Ryan MP, Adley CC. Ralstonia spp.: Emerging global opportunistic pathogens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33(3):291-304. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Rajendran UD, Sundaramoorthy S, Sethuraman G. Ralstonia mannitolilytica sepsis in neonatal intensive care unit-Be (a) ware of the multidrug resistant nosocomial bug. Trop Doct. 2022;52(1):216-17. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Bocsanczy AM, Achenbach UC, Mangravita-Novo A, Yuen JM, Norman DJ. Comparative effect of low temperature on virulence and twitching motility of Ralstonia solanacearum strains present in Florida. Phytopathol. 2012;102(2):185-94. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Tüzemen NÜ, Önal U, Kazak E, Tezgeç N, Eren H, Simşek H, et al. An outbreak of Ralstonia insidiosa bloodstream infections caused by contaminated heparinised syringes. J Infect Chemother. 2022;28(10):1387-92. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Kendirli T, Ciftçi E, Ince E, Incesoy S, Güriz H, Aysev AD, et al. Ralstonia pickettii outbreak associated with contaminated distilled water used for respiratory care in a paediatric intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect. 2004;56(1):77-78. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Lucarelli C, Di Domenico EG, Toma L, Bracco D, Prignano G, Fortunati M, et al. Ralstonia mannitolilytica infections in an oncologic day ward: Description of a cluster among high-risk patients. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017;6:01-07. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Ryan MP, Adley CC. The antibiotic susceptibility of water-based bacteria Ralstonia pickettii and Ralstonia insidiosa. J Med Microbiol. 2013;62(7):1025-31.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/64415.19200

Date of Submission: Apr 05, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 20, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jan 21, 2024
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 08, 2023
• Manual Googling: Nov 23, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jan 19, 2024 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com