Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 114884

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : March | Volume : 18 | Issue : 3 | Page : BC16 - BC20 Full Version

Serum Vitamin D Levels and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: March 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/60937.19215
Shilpa K Shet, Aruna Gowdra, HL Vishwanath, K Ravi

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 3. Principal, Department of Biochemistry, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 4. Director, Department of Biochemistry, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Aruna Gowdra,
1st Block, Siddapura, Jayanagar, Bengaluru-560029, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: agowdra@yahoo.com

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is the most common noncommunicable disease and the fifth leading cause of death worldwide. Recent research has demonstrated that low Vitamin D levels and high Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in middle-aged and elderly populations represent a risk factor for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM).

Aim: To estimate the Vitamin D and VEGF levels in study subjects with T2DM and healthy controls and to correlate the Vitamin D level and VEGF with HbA1c % in study subjects with T2DM.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was undertaken from October 2014 to November 2016 at the Department of Medicine in collaboration with the Department of Biochemistry, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore. The study included 50 T2DM subjects on oral hypoglycaemic agents for five years and 50 age and sex-matched healthy controls selected randomly from the general population. In all the study subjects, Random Blood Glucose (RBG), LFT, Renal Function Test (RFT), HBA1c, serum Vitamin D, and serum VEGF were estimated. Student t-test and Chi-square/Fisher-Exact test were used to find the significance of study parameters between cases and controls. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was done to assess the risk factors for DM.

Results: The mean age of the cases was 50.9±9.7 years and of controls was 49.76±7.7 years. Among the 50 cases, 19 (38%) were men and 31 (62%) were women. Among the 50 controls, 27 (54%) were men and 23 (46%) were women. The mean Body Mass Index (BMI) among cases was 27.21±4.59 and in controls was 24.82±2.63 (p-value=0.0016). The mean serum 25(OH) Vitamin D levels in cases were 11.39±3.32 ng/mL and in controls were 28.06±11.14 ng/mL (p-value <0.001). The mean serum VEGF levels in cases were 97.52±16.96 pg/mL and in controls were 56.37±17.74 pg/mL (p-value <0.001).

Conclusion: The present study found that subjects with T2DM have lower serum 25(OH) Vitamin D levels and higher serum VEGF levels than those without T2DM. Serum Vitamin D decreases and serum VEGF-A levels increase with increasing HbA1c%, correlating with vascular complications.

Keywords

Glycaemic control, Hyperglycaemia, Vascular permeability factor, 25-hydroxy Cholecalciferol

DM is a group of disorders characterised by chronic hyperglycaemia associated with disturbances of carbohydrate, fat, and protein metabolism due to absolute or relative deficiency of insulin secretion or its action (1). DM is one of the most common non-communicable diseases and is the eighth leading cause of death, resulting in 1.5 million deaths worldwide (2). It is estimated that about 382 million people in the world have diabetes at present, and by 2035, around 592 million people (one adult in 10) will be diabetic (2). According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), India stands second in the world with 65.1 million diabetics (3).

Vitamin D and VEGF levels are found to play a role in the clinical consequences of T2DM: 25-Hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D has been shown to be inversely related to Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) concentrations (4), and Vitamin D has a role in maintaining normal insulin synthesis and secretion (5). Other evidence has revealed that Vitamin D supplementation increased insulin secretion from the pancreas (4),(6). Additionally, Vitamin D replacement in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance has been shown to decrease insulin resistance (7). Researchers suggest that maintaining Vitamin D levels might provide protective effects against T2DM and its complications (8).

VEGF is a protein produced by endothelial progenitor cells that stimulates vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. It is a part of the system that restores the oxygen supply to tissues when blood circulation is inadequate (9). VEGF plays a pivotal role in the retinal microvascular complications of diabetes (10). VEGF also plays a key role in the development of both Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) and Diabetic Macular Oedema (DME). VEGF has emerged as a major mediator of intraocular neovascularisation, microaneurysm formation, and capillary occlusion with ischaemia, as well as promoting increased vascular permeability (11),(12).

Hurskainen AR et al., observed an inverse association between 25(OH)D levels and fasting insulin, fasting glucose, and 2-hour glucose tolerance test, implying that low serum 25(OH)D may be associated with impaired glucose and insulin metabolism (13). Suzuki A et al., analysed the relationship between serum 25-OHD concentration and the clinical features associated with T2DM. They concluded that microvascular complications and insulin treatment in T2DM patients are associated with the co-existence of hypovitaminosis D (14). Panou N et al., found that Vitamin D insufficiency may be a poor prognostic factor in patients with advanced diabetic disease, and Vitamin D insufficiency may exert gender-specific effects in the context of T2DM (15).

All the above-mentioned studies have evaluated the role of Vitamin-D and VEGF in increasing the risk of macro and microvascular complications of T2DM. There are no studies that have evaluated Vitamin-D and VEGF levels in study subjects with T2DM on oral hypoglycaemic agents for five years and correlated Vitamin-D levels and VEGF with HBA1c.

Hence, the present study was conducted to evaluate the serum levels of 25(OH)D and VEGF-A and to correlate these parameters with HbA1c in T2DM subjects on oral hypoglycaemic agents for five years.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in the outpatient Department of Medicine, in collaboration with the Department of Biochemistry, Victoria Hospital and Bowring and Lady Curzon Hospitals attached to Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, over a period of two years from October 2014 to November 2016. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute (vide IEC No: BMC/PG/255/2014-15 Dated 30/11/2014). The procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 that was revised in 2013. A written informed consent was obtained from all study subjects.

Inclusion criteria: Study subjects with T2DM, aged between 30-70 years diagnosed according to American Diabetes Association criteria {Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS) ≥126 mg/dL and 2-hour Postprandial Blood Sugar (PPBS) ≥200 mg/dL)} (16), on oral hypoglycaemic agents for five years attending the outpatient department were included as cases. Age and sex-matched healthy subjects, selected randomly from the general population, were included as controls.

Exclusion criteria: Subjects with liver and renal dysfunction, cardiovascular and metabolic bone disease, and subjects on Vitamin-D supplementation, pregnant and lactating women were excluded.

Sample size: Sample size was calculated based on study done by Vijay GS et al., (17). Sample size was calculated using the formula (18):

n=Z2P(1-P)/d2

Where ‘n’ is the sample size, z=1.96 (95% confidence interval), p=74.14% (prevalence of Vitamin-D deficiency), d=13% (Absolute precision), dropout rate=10% n=47.98 Approx. 50 in each group.

Thus, 50 cases and 50 controls were included in the study.

Data collection: Data regarding age and gender were collected from all the study subjects. About 5 mL of blood sample was collected from the median cubital vein using aseptic precautions in Ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetic acid (EDTA) tube and in a gel tube. The sample was allowed to clot for 30 minutes and subjected to centrifugation for 10 minutes at 1,000-2,000 x g to separate the serum. The samples were stored in a deep freezer at -80°C until they were processed. HbA1c, FBG, LFT, RFT, Vitamin-D, and VEGF were estimated in all the study subjects. The method of estimation and reference range/cut-off range for all the parameters is given in (Table/Fig 1) (19),(20),(21),(22),(23),(24),(25).

Statistical Analysis

Data were entered into MS Excel Version 2016 and analysed using R Software. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was carried out in the present study. Results on continuous measurements were presented as mean±Standard Deviation (SD), and results on categorical measurements were presented in numbers and percentages (%). Student t-test (two-tailed, independent) was used to find the significance of study parameters on a continuous scale between two groups: inter group analysis on metric parameters. Chi-square/Fisher-Exact test was used to find the significance of study parameters on a categorical scale between two groups. Pearson Correlation was performed to find the association between Vitamin-D and VEGF with FBG and HbA1c among cases. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted, and odds ratio was calculated to study the risk factors among cases and controls. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The present study involved 50 T2DM subjects on oral hypoglycaemic agents for five years and 50 age and sex-matched healthy controls randomly selected from the general population. In the present study, the majority of the cases were aged between 41-60 years. The mean age of the cases was 50.9±9.72 years, and for controls, it was 49.76±7.74 years. There was no significant difference in age between cases and controls (Table/Fig 2).

In the present study, Serum 25(OH)D levels were lower than the normal reference values in both cases and controls. The mean Vitamin-D level in cases was in the deficiency range (<20 ng/mL) with 11.39±3.32 ng/mL, and in controls, it was in the insufficiency range (20-30 ng/mL) with 28.06±11.14 ng/mL, with a p-value <0.001. Serum VEGF-A levels were higher than the normal reference values (31-86 pg/mL) in cases with a mean value of 97.52±16.96 pg/mL and within the normal range in controls with 56.37±17.74 pg/mL, with a p-value <0.001 (Table/Fig 3).

A negative correlation was observed between serum 25(OH)D with both FBG and HbA1c in T2DM, which was not statistically significant. A positive correlation was observed between serum VEGF-A with both FBG and HbA1c in T2DM, which was not statistically significant (Table/Fig 4).

In the study, it is noted from (Table/Fig 5) that serum Vitamin-D decreases and serum VEGF-A increases with worsening glycaemic control, which is statistically significant in the T2DM patients studied.

The risk factors for Type II diabetes were studied among cases and controls using multivariate logistic regression analysis, as shown in (Table/Fig 6). It was found that obesity, defined by BMI ≥25, had an OR of 2.26 (95% CI 1.01 to 5.05, p-value=0.05), poor glycaemic control (HbA1c % more than 8%) had an OR of 18.06 (95% CI 5.29 to 61.75, p=0.97), Vitamin-D deficiency (25-OH-Vitamin-D less than 20 ng/mL) had an OR of 0.84 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.90, p=0.89), and high VEGF-A (more than 46 pg/mL) had an OR of 1.09 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.13, p=0.41), respectively.

Discussion

Fifty T2DM subjects on oral hypoglycaemic agents for five years were evaluated based on their history and biochemical investigations, with special reference to Vitamin-D and VEGF, and correlated with HbA1c.

In the present study, the age of the T2DM subjects ranged from 30 to 70 years, with a mean age of 50.9±9.7 years. Cases and controls were age-matched. The age distribution of the T2DM subjects in the present study was in accordance with previous studies [26,27]. In previous studies, the age range was between 25-68 years, with a mean age of 50.1±13.4 years, and Lee JH et al., in their study, reported an age range of 30-70 years, with a mean of 56.9±8.78 years (28).

Among the cases, 19 (38%) were males and 31 (62%) were females. Cases were gender-matched with controls. Gender distribution is in accordance with the studies of Erem C et al., with 53.34% females and 46.66% males, and Bhargavi SK et al., with 36.66% males and 63.34% females (29),(30).

In this study, the cases had a mean FBG value of 225±81.87 mg/dL and 97.19±09.40 mg/dL among controls, with a p-value <0.001, which was statistically strongly significant. The FBG values in cases were higher than the cut-off value of 126 mg/dL, which correlated well with the clinical diagnosis (31).

Glycated haemoglobin is an indicator of both the severity and long-term glycaemic control of DM. It reflects approximately the average blood glucose concentration over the preceding six to eight weeks and is not affected by diet, exercise, insulin therapy, and other drugs. It is a measure of the risk for the development of both micro and macrovascular complications in subjects with T2DM (32). The mean HbA1c in the cases was 8.64±2.32%, and in controls, it was 5.39±0.41%, with a p-value <0.001. The HbA1c values were higher in cases, which correlated with the clinical diagnosis. The values in this study are in accordance with several studies that have shown an increase in HbA1c levels in diabetics (29),(30).

Vitamin-D deficiency seems to predispose individuals to T2DM. A study conducted by Tahrani AA et al., showed that subjects with T2DM or glucose had lower serum Vitamin-D concentrations compared to individuals without diabetes (32). In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) study (33), which assessed insulin resistance, kidney function, and Vitamin-D status of 14,679 subjects, Vitamin-D deficiency was reported to be associated with increased risks of microvascular and macrovascular complications in subjects with T1DM as well as, T2DM. In this study, the mean±SD serum Vitamin-D levels in cases were 11.39±3.32 ng/mL and in controls were 28.06±11.14 ng/mL, with a p-value <0.001, which is statistically strongly significant. In this study, mean Vitamin-D levels were decreased in cases compared to controls, consistent with the studies of Chiu KC et al., Boucher BJ et al., Song Y et al., and Palomer X et al., (34),(35),(36),(37).

Various factors can be attributed to this poor Vitamin-D status among Indians, such as lack of adequate sunlight exposure, darker skin pigmentation, obesity, and predominantly vegetarian dietary habits. A negative Pearson correlation was observed between serum Vitamin-D and FBG, and between serum Vitamin-D and HbA1c in T2DM subjects, which was statistically not significant. The studies conducted by Hurskainen AR et al., Song Y et al., Sun Q et al., Lau SL et al., and Need AG et al., showed that the decrease in Vitamin-D is due to hyperglycemia seen in T2DM subjects (13),(36),(37),(38),(39),(40).

In this study, the mean±SD serum VEGF-A levels in cases were 97.52±16.96, and in controls, they were 56.37±17.74 with a p-value <0.001. This aligns with the studies conducted by Siervo M et al., who demonstrated that VEGF level is increased in diabetic subjects compared to the control group (41). This increase in VEGF level may be due to increases in response to hypoxia resulting from diabetic microvascular complications and vasculopathy.

Shrikant et al., agree with us, as they found that HbA1c levels in subjects with T2DM showed a positive correlation with VEGF levels, which suggests that VEGF levels increase as HbA1c levels go high (indicating poor long-term control of diabetes), thereby increasing the severity of proliferative DR (42). They explained that long-term poor control of diabetes causes endothelial damage and hypoxia, leading to increased VEGF, which in turn causes neovascularisation and worsens the state.

Kamba T and McDonald DM showed that the level of VEGF increases with the severity of DR, being higher in subjects with PDR compared to those with non-proliferative DR. VEGF level was increased in diabetic subjects with complications compared to diabetic subjects without complications (43). They also explained that VEGF plays a key role in the development of both PDR and DME.

In recent years, anti-VEGF agents have emerged as new approaches to the treatment of these devastating diabetic complications. Intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy with bevacizumab (Avastin) is currently being used in clinical practice. Intravitreal injection is an effective anti-VEGF drug for the retina. However, this is an invasive procedure associated with potentially serious complications, such as endophthalmitis or retinal detachment, which may occur in subjects requiring serial treatment over many years. In addition, anti-VEGF drugs could pass into the systemic circulation and may cause hypertension, proteinuria, increased cardiovascular events, and impaired wound healing (44).

Limitation(s)

The results of the present study cannot be generalised to the community, as this study is a cross-sectional study. A prospective study over a longer time duration, involving follow-up of T2DM subjects who go on to develop symptomatic microvascular or macrovascular complications would have been more informative.

Conclusion

In the present study, subjects with poor glycaemic control had low vitamin D and high VEGF levels compared to those with good glycaemic control, suggesting that poor glycaemic control was the forerunner of microvascular and macrovascular complications associated with T2DM. Correction of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency through vitamin D supplementation was associated with an improvement in VEGF levels, suggesting the role of vitamin D in the prevention of complications associated with T2DM. Routine screening of serum vitamin D status and vitamin D supplementation may be an effective public health intervention to improve the vitamin D status of the population, as well as, improve glycaemic control in T2DM subjects and prevent microvascular and macrovascular complications.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the Director, faculty, and staff of the Department of Biochemistry and Department of Medicine, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, and the Director, faculty, and staff of Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bengaluru, India, for their constant encouragement and support. They would also like to thank the patients for their contribution to the study.

References

1.
Bennett PH, Knowles WC. Definition, diagnosis and classification of Diabetes mellitus and glucose homeostasis. In: Kahn CR, Weir GC, King GL, Jacobson AM, Moses AC, Smith RJ, editors. Joslin’s Diabetes Mellitus. 14th ed. Boston: Ovid Technologies, Inc.; 2005.
2.
WHO- World Health Organization report- The 10 leading causes of death in the world, 2000 and 2012; updated in May 2014.
3.
The global burden, International Diabetes Federation 6th edition. 2013; Pp:12,22,16,14,33-34.
4.
Pittas AG, Lau J, Hu FB, Dawson-Hughes B. The role of Vitamin-D and calcium in type 2 diabetes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(6):2017-29. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Reis JP, von Muhlen D, Donna Kritz-Silverstein, Wingard DL, Barrett-Connor E. Vitamin-D, parathyroid hormone levels, and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in community-dwelling older adults. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(6):1549-55. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Gedik O, Akalin S. Effects of Vitamin-D deficiency and repletion on insulin and glucagon secretion in man. Diabetologia. 1986;29(3):142-45. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Pittas AG, Harris SS, Stark PC, Dawson-Hughes B. The effects of calcium and Vitamin-D supplementation on blood glucose and markers of inflammation in nondiabetic adults. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(4):980-86. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Chowdhury TA, Boucher BJ, Hitman GA. Vitamin-D and type 2 diabetes: Is there a link? Prim Care Diabetes. 2009;3(2):115-16. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Isaia G, Giorgino R, Adami S. High prevalence of hypovitaminosis D in female type 2 diabetic population. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(8):1496. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Caldwell RB, Bartoli M, Behzadian MA, El-Remessy AE, Al-Shabrawey M, Platt DH, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor and diabetic retinopathy: Pathophysiological mechanisms and treatment perspectives. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2003;19(6):442-55. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Zhao Y, Singh RP. The role of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) in the management of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Drugs in Context. 2018;7:212532. Doi: 10.7573/dic.212532. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Gupta N, Mansoor S, Sharma A, Sapkal A, Sheth J, Falatoonzadeh P, et al. Diabetic retinopathy and VEGF. Open Ophthalmol J. 2013;7:04-10. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Hurskainen AR, Virtanen JK, Tuomainen TP, Nurmi T, Voutilainen S. Association of serum 25-hydroxyVitamin-D with type 2 diabetes and markers of insulin resistance in a general older population in Finland. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012;28(5):418-23. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Suzuki A, Kotake M, Ono Y, Kato T, Oda N, Hayakawa N, et al. Hypovitaminosis D in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Association with microvascular complications and type of treatment. Endocr J. 2006;53(4):503-10. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Panou N, Georgopoulos S, Panou M, Sergentanis TN, Papalampros A, Maropoulos G, et al. Serum 25(OH)D and VEGF in diabetes mellitus type 2: Gender-specific associations. Int J Collab Res Intern Med Public Health. 2011;3(10):790-95.
16.
Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(Suppl.1):S8-S16. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Vijay GS, Ghonge S, Vajjala SM, Palal D. Prevalence of Vitamin-D deficiency in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: A cross-sectional study. Cureus. 2023;15(5):e38952. Doi: 10.7759/cureus.38952. [crossref]
18.
Pourhoseingholi MA, Vahedi M, Rahimzadeh M. Sample size calculation in medical studies. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2013;6(1):14-17.
19.
https://www.beckmancoulter.com.
20.
Hoelzel W, Weykamp C, Jeppsson JO, Miedema, Barr JR, Goodall I, et al. IFCC Reference System for measurement of hemoglobin A1c in human blood and the National Standardisation Schemes in the United States, Japan, and Sweden: A method-comparison study. Clin Chem. 2004;50(1):166-74. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
https://www.beckmancoulter.com/ 22/10/2012 IFU of each test method in Beckman Coulter AU 480.
22.
Bondar RJ, Mead DC. Evaluation of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase from Leuconostoc mesenteroides in the hexokinase method for determining glucose in serum. Clin Chem. 1974;20(5):586-90. [crossref]
23.
Gowenlock AH, McMurray JR, McLauchlan DM. Varley’s Practical Clinical Biochemistry. 6th Ed. New Delhi: CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd.; 1988.
24.
https://dialog1.roche.com.
25.
Petrova TV, Taija M, Kari A. Signaling via vascular endothelial growth factor receptors. Exp Cell Res. 1999;253(1):117-30. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Nuttall FQ. Body Mass Index obesity, BMI, and health: A critical review. Nutrition Today. 2015;50(3):117-28. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Orwoll E, Nielson CM, Marshall LM, Lambert L, Holton KF, Hoffman AR, et al. Vitamin-D deficiency in older men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(4):1214-22. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Lee JH, O’Keefe JH, Bell D, Hensrud DD, Holick MF. Vitamin-D deficiency: An important, common, and easily treatable cardiovascular risk factor? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(24):1949-56. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Erem C, Hacihasanoglu A, Celik S, Ovali E, Ersoz HO, Ukinç K, et al. Coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters in type 2 diabetic subjects with and without diabetic vascular complications. Med Princ Pract. 2005;14(1):22-30.[crossref][PubMed]
30.
Bhargavi SK, Maruthi Prasad BV, Vishwanath HL. Serum Leptin as a risk factor for diabetes mellitus. Int J Pharm Biol Sci. 2013;3(3):252-59.
31.
Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2015 Abridged for Primary Care Providers. Clin Diabetes. 2015;33(2):97-111. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Tahrani AA, Ball A, Shepherd L, Rahim A, Jones AF, Bates A. The prevalence of Vitamin-D abnormalities in South Asians with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UK. Int J Clin Pract. 2010;64(3):351-55. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Chonchol M, Scragg R. 25-HydroxyVitamin-D, insulin resistance, and kidney function in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Kidney Int. 2007;71(2):134-39. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Chiu KC, Chu A, Go VL, Saad MF. Hypovitaminosis D is associated with insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79(5):820-25. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Boucher BJ, Mannan N, Noonan K, Hales C, Evans JW. Glucose intolerance and impairment of insulin secretion in relation to Vitamin-D deficiency in East London Asians Diabetologia. 1995;38(10):1239-45. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Song Y, Ford E, Manson J, Buring J, Ridker P. Dietary calcium, Vitamin-D and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in middle-aged and older U.S. women. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(12):2926-32. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Palomer X, Gonzalez-Clemente JM, Blanco-Vaca F, Mauricio D. Role of Vitamin-D in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008;10(3):185-97. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Sun Q, Manson J, Dawson-Hughes B, Hu F. Plasma 25-hydroxyVitamin-D concentration and risk of incident type 2 diabetes in women. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(9):2021-23. [crossref][PubMed]
39.
Lau SL, Gunton J, Athayde N, Byth K, Cheung N. Serum 25-hydroxyVitamin-D and glycated haemoglobin levels in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Med J Aust. 2011;194(7):334-37. [crossref][PubMed]
40.
Need AG, O’Loughlin P, Horowitz M, Nordin B. Relationship between fasting serum glucose, age, body mass index and serum 25 hydroxy Vitamin-D in postmenopausal women. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005;62(6):738-41. [crossref][PubMed]
41.
Siervo M, Tomatis V, Stephan BCM, Feelisch M, Bluck LJC. VEGF is indirectly associated with NO production and acutely increases in response to hyperglycaemia(1). Eur J Clin Invest. 2012;42(9):967-73. [crossref][PubMed]
42.
Shrikant, Gaurav S. Correlation and concentration of VEGF-A in vitreous fluid. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;20:139-81.
43.
Kamba T, Mc Donald DM. Mechanisms of adverse effects of anti-VEGF therapy for cancer. Br J Cancer. 2007;96(12):1788-95. [crossref][PubMed]
44.
Zaman Y, Rehman AU, Memon AF. Intravitreal Avastin as an adjunct in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy undergoing pars plana vitrectomy. Pak J Med Sci. 2013;29(2):590-92.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/60937.19215

Date of Submission: Oct 21, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Nov 23, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jan 11, 2024
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 25, 2023
• Manual Googling: Nov 20, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jan 08, 2024 (13%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com