Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 50524

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : March | Volume : 18 | Issue : 3 | Page : BC10 - BC15 Full Version

Glycated Haemoglobin and TIMI Score as Risk Predictor in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: March 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/66819.19180
Agot Garang Ayur, M Vasanthan, VM Vinodhini, P Renuka, Sriram Veeraraghavan

1. Student, Department of Biochemistry, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SRM Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SRM Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Biochemistry, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SRM Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Professor, Department of Biochemistry, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SRM Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Professor, Department of Cardiology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SRM Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. M Vasanthan,
Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SRM Institute, Chennai-603203, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: vasanthm1@srmist.edu.in

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death and disability globally. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score is calculated to assess the risk outcome among myocardial infarction patients. Researchers found that diabetic patients with myocardial infarction have relatively unfavourable outcomes when compared to myocardial infarction patients without diabetes.

Aim: To evaluate Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, the TIMI score in Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) patients and compare them between ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) and non STEMI (NSTEMI) patients.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the Department of Cardiology at SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India, from July 2022 to June 2023. A total of 100 myocardial infarction patients were included and divided into two groups based on Electrocardiogram (ECG) findings and Creatine Phosphokinase-MB (CK-MB) values, with 50 STEMI and 50 NSTEMI. Patients blood samples were evaluated for HbA1c, total cholesterol, Triglycerides (TGL), High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), Very High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C), and CK-MB parameters. The TIMI score was calculated to evaluate the risk of developing complications among myocardial infarction patients. Pearson’s correlation was used to correlate biochemical parameters with the TIMI score.

Results: A total of 100 myocardial infarction patients were analysed in the present study, with 50 being STEMI (mean HbA1c%: 8.0±0.2.8) and 50 being NSTEMI (mean HbA1c%: 7.2±2.0) with a p-value of <0.01*, a high TIMI score in STEMI patients (means 5.38±2.76) and 50 NSTEMI (mean 3.24±1.20) with a p-value of <0.0001*. Also, HbA1c was strongly positively correlated with the TIMI score in both the STEMI and NSTEMI groups, with r-value of 0.6 (p=0.0001*) and 0.7 (p=0.0001*), respectively. CK-MB was correlated with the TIMI score in both STEMI and NSTEMI, with r-value of 0.308 (0.03) and 0.375 (0.007). There was no correlation between the TIMI score and the lipid profile.

Conclusion: The study concluded that HbA1c, along with the TIMI score, is a significant predictor of risk outcome in AMI patients.

Keywords

Creatine Kinase-MB, Electrocardiogram, Lipid profile, Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction score

The CVD is one of the leading causes of disease burden and deaths globally (1). Coronary artery disease is a major cause of CVD and disability-adjusted life years, as well as one of the most typical causes of death in both industrialised and underdeveloped nations (2), with India recording the highest prevalence of CVD (3),(4). Developed countries like the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) recorded 151 in 100,000 and 122 in 100,000, respectively, according to the global burden of disease reports (5),(6). The global average for age-standardised CVD is 133 in 100,000, with India recording 282 in 100,000 in 2017, contributing to 24% of total deaths (6),(7).

In India, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, and Kerala states record a high number of CVD and also have a high prevalence of blood pressure and cholesterol levels (8). Early identification and management of risk factors are crucial (9),(10). Numerous specific factors have been discovered by studies as indicators of increased risk for death and heart ischaemic episodes [11-13]. Elements of the medical history, such as old age of 65 years and above, diabetes mellitus, and extra-cardiac atherosclerotic disease, are linked to increased chances of death or repeated ischaemic episodes (14).

Early risk assessment can help determine the prognosis of individuals with non ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Several risk scores have been established to help predict outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (15),(16),(17). NSTEMI is often calculated using the TIMI risk score grading system, which employs a 7-point scale. The TIMI STEMI risk score ranges from 0 to 14 points. STEMI accounts for the smallest proportion of acute coronary syndromes, but it has the most severe consequences. The most beneficial medical results are obtained with the primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) approach (18),(19). Glycated haemoglobin is defined as a non enzymatic addition of glucose to the N-terminal of the valine of the beta chain of haemoglobin, and it is used for the diagnosis of diabetes and as an index for long-term control of blood glucose levels. Patients with diabetes have an increased chance of developing CVD and less favourable outcomes compared to people without diabetes (20).

Ambiguity in the optimum cut-off values for blood sugar in AMI individuals for predicting adverse events might vary within STEMI and NSTEMI patients, and the diabetic status of patients needs to be considered in order to prevent an erroneous assessment of the true incidence of stress-induced hyperglycaemia (21). A number of studies have demonstrated that poor glycaemic control among those with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) correlates with an increased risk of coronary heart disease (22),(23),(24),(25). The TIMI risk score is utilised in clinical research studies to identify a population with greater event rates by excluding patients with low-risk scores (26),(27). Hence, the present study was conducted to evaluate HbA1c levels, TIMI score in AMI patients, and compare them between STEMI and NSTEMI patients.

Material and Methods

This hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted in the ICU Department of Cardiology at SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India, from July 2022 to June 2023. The study protocol was followed in accordance with the approval of the Institutional Ethics Committee (SRM IEC-ST0722-08), and informed written consent was obtained from all subjects.

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged between 31 to 80 years, with symptoms of Anaemia of Chronic Disease (ACD) such as chest pain, referred pain radiating to the epigastrium, arm, neck, and jaw with a confirmed diagnosis by definite (ECG) changes and elevated CK-MB (>24 IU/L) were included (28).

Exclusion criteria: Patients having chest pain with normal ECG and normal cardiac markers, chronic renal failure patients, a history of any other cardiac illness, pregnant patients, and chronic inflammatory conditions like rheumatoid arthritis were excluded.

Sample size calculation: Krishnan MN et al., calculated the prevalence (p) of ACS by age-adjusted prevalence of various parameters among Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) patients (4). Using RAQ angina p (%) was 49.69 and was rounded to the nearest whole number, hence p=50. The formula used for sample size calculation was n=4pq/d², where q=100-p, and d=0.2*p, and the sample size calculated was n=100.

Study Procedure

All subjects were subjected to a detailed history as per the prepared proforma and relevant investigations. After obtaining informed and written consent, these include age, gender, TIMI score risk factors, and biochemical parameters. Blood samples were taken from the ward by specialised nurses in the Cardiology Department, and biochemical analysis was performed in the central laboratory’s Department of Biochemistry at SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre. A 5 mL peripheral venous blood sample was collected from all the participants under strict aseptic precautions in appropriate vacutainers, and samples were centrifuged at 4500 rpm for seven minutes, and the serum/plasma was separated.

Biochemical parameters: The samples were subjected to biochemical investigations using the automated chemistry analyser Beckman Coulter AU480 for measurements of total cholesterol, TGL, HDL-C, LDL-C (12), CK-MB (29), and HbA1c (30). VLDL Cholesterol cannot be measured directly; hence, it was computed using the Friedewald equation by TGL/5 cut-off value (<40 mg/dL) (Table/Fig 1) (12).

Risk stratification: The STEMI TIMI risk score is calculated by assessing the following parameters with the following points: ages ≥75 years are given 3 points, and ages ranging between 65 to 74 years are given 2 points, systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg is 3 points, heart rate >100 bpm and Killip’s class ii -iv 2 points each, anterior MI or LBB, weight <67, Time to treatment >4 hours are given 1 point each, and diabetes, history of hypertension, and prior angina all with 1 point each (18),(19). While the NSTEMI TIMI score has seven variables, one point each: age >65 years, ≥3 CAD risk factors known CAD (stenosis ≥50%), aspirin use in the past seven days, severe angina ≥2 episodes in 24 hours ECG ST changes ≥0.5 mm and positive cardiac marker (Table/Fig 2) (17),(18).

Statistical Analysis

The data were analysed using the Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS 22.0). Student’s t-test was applied to analyse the difference between the mean levels of various parameters between the two groups. The correlation between the measured variables was assessed using the Spearman’s correlation equation. The distribution of myocardial infarction based on biochemical risk factors and TIMI score was calculated. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Due to a wide range of CK-MB data, the median and interquartile range were calculated for the CK-MB values.

Results

The study was conducted on 100 myocardial infarction patients who were divided into two groups based on ECG findings: STEMI and NSTEMI. Each group included 50 participants aged between 30 and 80. It was found that the mean age of STEMI and NSTEMI patients was 58±11 and 60±12 years, respectively, and the p-value was not significant. Patients aged over 50 years had a higher chance of developing an AMI. Among the 50 STEMI patients, 31 (62%) were male and 19 (38%) were female, while among the 50 NSTEMI patients, 32 (64%) were male and 18 (36%) were female (Table/Fig 3).

Among the 50 STEMI patients, 29 (58%) were diabetic, 15 (30%) were hypertensive, 10 (20%) had a heart rate >100, 7 (14%) were in Killip’s class II-IV, 20 (40%) had a weight <67 kg, 10 (20%) had severe angina, and all patients were treated for >4 hours. Among the 50 NSTEMI patients, 10 (20%) had ≥3 risk factors for CAD, 22 (44%) had used aspirin in the past 7 days, 20 (40%) had prior stenosis ≥50, 38 (76%) had severe angina, 23 (46%) had segment deviation, and 33 (66%) had elevated cardiac markers. The number of patients aged ≥65 years was 18 (36%) and 14 (28%) in NSTEMI and STEMI, respectively (Table/Fig 4).

Biochemical parameters: The mean values of TIMI score, HbA1c, CK-MB, Total cholesterol, TGL, HDL-C, LDL-C, and VLDL-C were compared between the STEMI and NSTEMI patients. It was found that the mean values of TIMI score, CK-MB, and HbA1c were significantly elevated in STEMI patients when compared to the NSTEMI patients. CK-MB values were widely ranged, hence the median and interquartile range were calculated for the CK-MB values. Lipid profile levels were also found to be elevated in STEMI patients when compared to the NSTEMI patients but were not statistically significant (Table/Fig 5).

Correlation of biochemical parameters: In STEMI and NSTEMI patients, HbA1c levels were strongly positively correlated with r values of 0.6 (p=0.0001*) and 0.7 (p=0.0001*), and CK-MB was significantly correlated with r values of 0.308 (p-value 0.03*) and 0.375 (p-value=0.007*), respectively. Lipid profiles were not significantly correlated and HDL-C was negatively correlated (Table/Fig 6),(Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8).

Discussion

The study involved 100 myocardial infarction patients who were grouped into two categories based on ECG findings: STEMI and NSTEMI. Both groups comprised 50 participants ranging in age from 31 to 80 years. The mean ages for the STEMI and NSTEMI groups were 58 and 60 years, respectively. The data indicated that patients aged over 50 years had a higher chance of developing MI.

According to Raina K et al., the majority of AMI patients were in the 41 to 70-year-old age range (2). Among 100 MI patients, 62% of STEMI and 64% of NSTEMI cases were male, while 38% of STEMI and 36% of NSTEMI cases were female. As demonstrated by Channamma G males are at a higher risk than females, as evidenced by the fact that there were 92.5% more men than women in the overall population (31). The prevalence of various risk factors in the present study was similar to the findings of a recent large-scale study from Kerala by Thankappan KR et al., (32).

The mean values of TIMI score, CK-MB, HbA1c, total cholesterol, TGL, HDL-C, LDL-C, and VLDL-C were compared between the STEMI and NSTEMI patients using a student’s t-test. When STEMI patients were compared to NSTEMI patients, the mean values of these parameters were significantly higher in STEMI patients. As cited by Santos ES et al., early coronary intervention has consistently been shown to improve clinical outcomes in high-risk patients, making risk assessment crucial (33). This may also provide clinicians with more diagnostic evidence, thereby reducing the fatality rate of AMI in the early stages (34). The conventional atherogenic lipoprotein LDL-C and the inflammatory marker have been extensively studied in relation to the development and prediction of adverse cardiac events in T2DM patients (34).

Ali F et al., demonstrated significantly higher concentrations of cardiac markers in diabetic patients with AMI compared to non diabetic subjects with AMI (35). Identifying individuals with cardiovascular risk factors and providing evidence-based care for them can minimise the morbidity and mortality (36). In STEMI and NSTEMI patients, HbA1c levels were strongly positively correlated with the TIMI score, with r values of 0.6 (p=0.0001*) and 0.7 (p=0.0001*), respectively. Therefore, increases in HbA1c levels are associated with increased TIMI scores among STEMI and NSTEMI patients. Selvin E et al., conducted a 14-year monitoring study which revealed that, compared to fasting glucose in the non-diabetic population, HbA1c values are associated with the risk of diabetes and, to a greater extent, with the risks of CHD and mortality (37).

The impact of high blood glucose on the long-term outcome of AMI can be categorised into several processes and holds distinct relevance when contrasted with HbA1c. Numerous investigations have demonstrated that high glucose more strongly indicates the acute phase of diseases, whereas HbA1c depicts long-term metabolic issues. Timmer JR et al., as cited, indicated that the acute and short-term outcomes of AMI in non diabetic patients, such as the extent of the myocardial infarct and death within thirty days, are more closely related to admission levels of glucose than HbA1c (38). As cited by Stratton IM et al., a one percent decrease in the revised mean HbA1c was linked to risk decreases of 21% for any endpoint associated with diabetic complications (95% CI: 17% to 24%, p<0.0001), 21% for diabetes-associated mortality (15 to 27%, p<0.0001), 14% for myocardial infarction (8% to 21%, p<0.0001), and 37% for complications of microvascular disease (33% to 41%, p<0.0001) (39). Gillett M the International Expert Committee has proposed a threshold value of 6.5% for Glycated haemoglobin in the diagnosis of diabetes (40).

According to a study, there was a clear long-term connection between glycated haemoglobin and major adverse cardiac events (21). According to the American Diabetes Association, individuals with HbA1c levels ranging from 5.7% to 6.4% could be classified as prediabetic, with a higher risk of diabetes and cardiovascular death (41). Inoue K et al., highlighted that, in accordance with clinical recommendations, HbA1c is being measured more regularly. There is an urgent need to address the long-debated subject of the potential impact of comparatively low HbA1c levels on health, as there may be an increase in the likelihood that practitioners will recognise individuals with low HbA1c values (42),(43),(44),(45). Similar and contrasting scientific research studies are tabulated (Table/Fig 9) (15),(17),(20),(21),(22),(25),(35),(37),(39),(42),(45).

Limitation(s)

The study was not prospective, but rather cross-sectional. The TIMI risk score for STEMI and NSTEMI is designed for early risk assessment after patient presentation and therefore doesn’t include non invasive and invasive data. Consequently, the outcomes of the hospital patients’ study were not tracked. The present study may not be sufficient to establish broader applicability.

Conclusion

The study concludes that the TIMI score, along with HbA1c, should be considered as aids in the early prediction of MI patients at higher risk of developing complications. Among MI patients, risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, and a family history of myocardial infarction were more common in STEMI compared to NSTEMI. Additionally, lipid profile values were higher in STEMI patients compared to NSTEMI patients. The level of the CK-MB biomarker was significantly higher among STEMI patients compared to NSTEMI patients. STEMI patients are at a higher risk of developing complications compared to NSTEMI patients. Therefore, HbA1c, along with the TIMI score, is a significant predictor of outcomes in AMI patients. Evaluation of the TIMI score with HbA1c may enhance clinical care.

References

1.
India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative CVD Collaborators. The changing patterns of cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors in the states of India: The Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2016. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e1339-51.
2.
Raina K, Verma N, Bhatia AS, Khanum S, Verma HN. Prevalence of conventional risk factor in acute myocardial infarction among Jammu division population. Int J Clin Biochem Res. 2020;7(1):91-97. [crossref]
3.
Huffman MD, Prabhakaran D, Osmond C, Fall CH, Tandon N, Lakshmy R, et al; New Delhi Birth Cohort. Incidence of cardiovascular risk factors in an Indian urban cohort result from the New Delhi birth cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(17):1765-74. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Krishnan MN, Zachariah G, Venugopal K, Mohanan PP, Harikrishnan S, Sanjay G, et al. Prevalence of coronary artery disease and its risk factors in Kerala, South India: A community-based cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016;16:12. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Vasan SK, Antonisamy B, Gowri M, Selliah HY, Geethanjali FS, Jebasingh FS, et al. Prevalence, incidence and predictors of cardiovascular risk factors: longitudinal data from rural and urban South India and comparison with global data. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020;8(1):e001782. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Pillai AG, Menon V, Satheesh S. Prevalence and correlates of Type D personality among survivors following acute myocardial infarction in a tertiary care center in south India. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2019;10(3):405-12. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Prabhakaran D, Jeemon P, Roy A. Cardiovascular Diseases in India: Current epidemiology and future directions. Circulation. 2016;133(16):1605-20. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Sreeniwas Kumar A, Sinha N. Cardiovascular disease in India: A 360-degree overview. Med J Armed Forces India. 2020;76(1):01-03. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Shraddha C, Bani T. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease in India and its economic impact- A review. Int J Sci Res Publ. 2018;3(10) (ISSN: 2250-3153). Available from: http//www.ijsrp.org/research-paper-1013.php?rp=P22185.
10.
Yunyun W, Tong L, Yingwu L, Bojiang L, Yu W, Xiaomin H, et al. Analysis of risk factors of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in young patients. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2014;14:179. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA. Executive Group on behalf of the Joint European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/World Heart Federation (WHF) Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). Circulation. 2018;138(20):e618-51. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Biradar MS, Rangaswamy. Lipid profile study in patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction for first time and admitted in tertiary care hospital Mysuru. J Assoc Physicians India. 2022;70(4):11-12.
13.
Currie CJ, Peters JR, Tynan A, Evans M, Heine RJ, Bracco OL, et al. Survival as a function of HbA 1c in people with type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2010;375(9713):481 89. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Yanqiao L, Shen L, Yutong M, Linghong S, Ben H. Comparison of GRACE and TIMI risk scores in the prediction of in-hospital and long-term outcomes among East Asian non ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022;22(1):01-09. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Alexander T, Kumbhani DJ, Subban V, Sundar H, Nallamothu BK, Mullasari AS. Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the young compared with older patients in the Tamil Nadu STEMI program. Heart Lung Circ. 2021;30(12):1876-82. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Topal D, Mutluer FO, Aydin O, Cakir H, Kanat S, Aslan B, et al. The relationship between haemoglobin A1c levels and thrombus load in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Res Med Sci. 2021;26:118. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Bashiruddin A, Chowdhury MI, Bhattacharjee B, Shahin AH, Ahsan SA, Mandal M, et al. Association of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score with angiographic severity of coronary artery disease in patients with non ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Univ Heart J. 2019;15(2):68-73. [crossref]
18.
Aragam KG, Tamhane UU, Kline-Rogers E, Li J, Fox KA, Goodman SG, et al. Does simplicity compromise accuracy in ACS risk prediction? A retrospective analysis of the TIMI and GRACE risk scores. PLoS One. 2009;4(11):e7947. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007947. PMID: 19956773; PMCID: PMC2776353. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Selvarajah S, Fong AY, Selvaraj G, Haniff J, Uiterwaal CS, Bots ML. An Asian validation of the TIMI risk score for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40249. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Chen CL, Yen DH, Lin CS, Tsai SH, Chen SJ, Sheu WH. Glycated hemoglobin level is an independent predictor of major adverse cardiac events after nonfatal acute myocardial infarction in nondiabetic patients: A retrospective observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(18):e6743. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Sia CH, Chan MH, Zheng H, Ko J, Ho AF, Chong J, et al. Optimal glucose, HbA1c, glucose-HbA1c ratio and stress-hyperglycaemia ratio cut-off values for predicting 1-year mortality in diabetic and non-diabetic acute myocardial infarction patients. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20(1):211. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Celik M, Abdullah K, Ahmet G, Murat G, Umit. The relationship between admission HbA1c level and infarct-related artery patency in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients. Eur J Ther. 2019;25(4):304-11. Doi: 10.5152/EurJTher.2019.18055. [crossref]
23.
Cao JJ, Hudson M, Jankowski M. Relation of chronic and acute glycemic control on mortality in acute myocardial infarction with diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96(2):183-86. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Hadjadj S, Coisne D, Mauco G. Prognostic value of admission plasma glucose and HbA1c in acute myocardial infarction. Diabet Med. 2004;21(4):305-10. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Berry C, Noble S, Gregoire J. Glycaemic status influences the nature and severity of coronary artery disease. Diabetologia. 2010;53(4):652-58. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Morrow DA, Antman EM, Charlesworth A, Cairns R, Murphy SA, de Lemos JA, et al. TIMI risk score for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A convenient, bedside, clinical score for risk assessment at presentation: An intravenous nPA for treatment of infarcting myocardium early II trial substudy. Circulation. 2000;102(17):2031-37. Doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.17.2031. PMID: 11044416. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, McCabe CH, Horacek T, Papuchis G, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA. 2000;284(7):835-42. Doi: 10.1001/jama.284.7.835. PMID: 10938172. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW, editors. Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations. 3rd ed. Boston: Butterworths; 1990.
29.
Xiong R, He L, Du X, Dong JZ, Ma CS. Impact of diabetes mellitus and hemoglobin A1c level on outcomes among Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome. Clin Cardiol. 2020;43(7):723-31. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Kasper DL, Fauci AS, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Jameson JL, Loscalzo J. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. McGraw Hill Education. 2015;1593-610.
31.
Channamma G. Age and gender distribution in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Med Innovatica. 2016;7(5):29-31.
32.
Thankappan KR, Shah B, Mathur P, Sarma PS, Srinivas G, Mini GK, et al. Risk factor profile for chronic non-communicable diseases: Results of a community-based study in Kerala, India. Indian J Med Res. 2010;131:53-63.
33.
Santos ES, Aguiar Filho Lde F, Fonseca DM, Londero HJ, Xavier RM, Pereira MP, et al. Correlation of risk scores with coronary anatomy in non ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013;100(6):511-17. English, Portuguese. [crossref]
34.
Fan J, Ma J, Xia N, Sun L, Li B, Liu H. Clinical value of combined detection of CK-MB, MYO, cTnI and plasma NT-proBNP in diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Clin Lab. 2017;63(3):427-33. Doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2016.160533. PMID: 28271683. [crossref]
35.
Ali F, Naqvi SA, Bismillah M, Wajid N. Comparative analysis of biochemical parameters in diabetic and non-diabetic acute myocardial infarction patients. Indian Heart J. 2016;68(3):325-31. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Wong ND. Epidemiological studies of CHD and the evolution of preventive cardiology. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11(5):276-89. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Selvin E, Steffes MW, Zhu H, Matsushita K, Wagenknecht L, Pankow J, et al. Glycated hemoglobin, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk in nondiabetic adults. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(9):800-11. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Timmer JR, Ottervanger JP, de Boer MJ, Boersma E, Grines CL, Westerhout CM, et al. Primary coronary angioplasty vs thrombolysis-2 Trialists Collaborators Group. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention compared with fibrinolysis for myocardial infarction in diabetes mellitus: Results from the Primary Coronary Angioplasty vs Thrombolysis-2 trial. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(13):1353-59.[crossref][PubMed]
39.
Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): Prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000;321(7258):405-12. [crossref][PubMed]
40.
Gillett M. International Expert Committee Report on the role of the A1c assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(7):1327-34. [crossref][PubMed]
41.
American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(Suppl 1):S13-22. [crossref][PubMed]
42.
Inoue K, Nianogo R, Telesca D, Goto A, Khachadourian V, Tsugawa Y, et al. Low HbA1c levels and all-cause or cardiovascular mortality among people without diabetes: The US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2015. Int J Epidemiol. 2021;50(4):1373-83. [crossref][PubMed]
43.
Li FR, Zhang XR, Zhong WF. Glycated Haemoglobin and all-cause and cause-specific mortality among adults with and without diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(4):3345-54. [crossref][PubMed]
44.
Saydah S, Tao M, Imperatore G, Gregg E. GHb level and subsequent mortality among adults in the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(8):1440-46. [crossref][PubMed]
45.
Goto A, Arah OA, Goto M, Terauchi Y, Noda M. Severe hypoglycaemia and cardiovascular disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis with bias analysis. BMJ. 2013;347:f4533.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/66819.19180

Date of Submission: Aug 05, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Sep 30, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jan 14, 2024
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 07, 2023
• Manual Googling: Dec 15, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jan 11, 2024 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com