Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 28592

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2024 | Month : March | Volume : 17 | Issue : 3 | Page : ND01 - ND03 Full Version

Congenital Bilateral Aniridia with Ectopia Lentis: A Case Report


Published: March 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/66990.19177
Vijaya Mallareddy, Sachin Daigavane, Pranaykumar Shinde

1. Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Vijaya Mallareddy,
Room No. G11, Shalinta PG Girls Hostel, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi, Meghe, Wardha-442001, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: mnvijaya97@gmail.com

Abstract

Aniridia is characterised by variable degrees of hypoplastic iris or complete absence of iris tissue and is a rare congenital disorder. Mutation in the PAX6 gene is mostly responsible for aniridia. It is associated with various ocular manifestations involving both anterior and posterior segments of the eye. A 14-year-old male patient, presented to the ophthalmology outpatient department with complaints of a gradual decrease in vision in his left eye. Upon examination, photophobia and bilateral aniridia associated with nystagmus were present in both eyes, along with a sclerally fixated intraocular lens in the right eye and a superiorly subluxated mature cataract in the left eye. Intraocular pressure was elevated in the left eye. Gonioscopy revealed rudimentary iris tissue in both eyes. Upon systemic examination, the patient was diagnosed with hydro-ureteronephrosis of the right-side, which was asymptomatic, and borderline intellectual functioning. This case highlights the unique features of WAGR syndrome (Wilm’s tumour, Aniridia, Genito-urinary anomalies, Range of developmental delay) presenting with aniridia and genito-urinary conditions, along with borderline intellectual functioning without the presentation of Wilm’s tumour. Cataract extraction by lens aspiration with scleral fixation of intraocular lens implantation was performed in the left eye. This study adds to the broader knowledge of the disease entity’s spectrum, exploring the diagnostic challenges associated with the case and potentially influencing diagnostic criteria. It may guide future studies exploring the diverse clinical presentations of WAGR syndrome.

Keywords

Cataract, Glaucoma, Genetics, Syndrome

Case Report

A 14-year-old male patient presented to the ophthalmology outpatient department with a gradually progressive and painless decrease in vision in his left eye since childhood. It was associated with intolerance to light and was impacting daily activities and school performance. He had a history of cataract extraction in his right eye five years ago. The patient denied any history of trauma and had intermittent episodes of acute abdominal pain. Moreover, the patient did not provide any significant family history.

Based on clinical examination, the patient’s right eye had a best-corrected visual acuity of 6/24 on Snellen’s chart, while the left eye had hand movements with perception of light present and projection of rays accurate in all quadrants. The patient had nystagmus in both eyes and was photophobic. Slit lamp examination showed a sclerally fixated intraocular lens in the right eye (Table/Fig 1) and hypermature cataract with a superiorly subluxated lens in the left eye (Table/Fig 2). The intraocular pressure was measured with a Goldmann applanation tonometer, and it was 22 mmHg in the right eye and 36 mmHg in the left eye at 10 am. Gonioscopic examination using a Zeiss 4-mirror Gonioscope confirmed the presence of a rudimentary iris stump in both eyes.

Based on the fundus examination using an Indirect ophthalmoscope, it was found that the right eye had a normal fundus, but the foveal reflex could not be appreciated (Table/Fig 3). On the other hand, the left eye had a normal disc, but the rest of the details could not be visualised due to the presence of cataract (Table/Fig 4). However, a B-scan was performed on the left eye, and the results were within normal limits (Table/Fig 5).

Considering the history of episodic abdominal pain, Ultrasonography of the abdomen and pelvis was advised, which showed the presence of right-sided Hydrourethronephrosis (Table/Fig 6). Intelligence quotient testing was also performed to rule out syndromic associations with aniridia, which showed borderline intellectual functioning.

The patient was started on Tablet (Tab.) Acetazolamide 125 mg once daily, along with eye drop Brimonidine 0.2% with Timolol 0.5% twice daily for four days.

A provisional diagnosis of atypical WAGR syndrome was made.

Further intervention for cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation was performed after obtaining written informed consent from the patient and the relatives, as well as ensuring fitness for surgery under general anaesthesia.

The surgical site was sterilised before the eyelids were retracted with a lid speculum (Table/Fig 7)a. Next, two partial-thickness scleral flaps were created at 3 and 9 o’clock, 180 degrees apart from each other. Two Sclerotomies were created under the scleral flaps, and intrascleral tunnels were made on either side, parallel to the limbus, using a crescent blade. After cauterising both sides, a 2.8 mm clear corneal incision was made, and nucleus aspiration was performed using a 23G Simcoe cannula (Table/Fig 7)b. Following this, an anterior vitrectomy was done using a 23G vitrectomy cutter. A scleral tuck foldable intraocular lens was then inserted through the corneal incision with the help of an injector (Table/Fig 7)c. Using an intraocular end-gripping forceps through the sclerotomy on one side, the leading haptic was exteriorised from the scleral tunnel, then an intraocular forceps was introduced through the opposite sclerotomy, and the trailing haptic was pulled out through it. The haptics on each side were then inserted into the scleral tunnels on both sides and tucked intrasclerally.

Challenges encountered during surgery were an unstable capsular bag during nucleus aspiration and the presence of a thin sclera during scleral flaps.

The post-operative visual acuity on day one was 6/60 with lid oedema, conjunctival congestion, sub-conjunctival haemorrhage at 3 and 9, a superior corneal incision, 2+ cells in the anterior chamber, and the intraocular lens in-situ. Fundus examination was normal, with the foveal reflex unable to be appreciated in the left eye. An increase in intraocular pressure was observed immediately after the surgery, with a value of 46 mmHg. Intravenous Mannitol 20% 100 mL was administered to the patient to control the pressure, followed by eye drop Brimonidine 0.2% with Timolol 0.5% twice daily. The patient was also prescribed oral antibiotics such as T. Ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice a day, T. Pantoprazole 40 mg once daily, and T. Ibuprofen 400 mg once daily for three days, along with topical antibiotics such as eye drop Moxifloxacin 0.5% with Prednisolone 1% eight times, eye drop Nepafenac 0.1% thrice daily, and eye drop Homatropine 2% twice daily for 15 days. The patient was instructed to return for a follow-up for an intraocular pressure check-up and was continued on eye drop Brimonidine 0.2% with Timolol 0.5% twice daily. During the first follow-up after 15 days, the intraocular pressure was 22 mmHg. Sub-conjunctival haemorrhage had reduced, with anterior chamber 1+ cells and the IOL in-situ. The patient was advised to taper eye drop Prednisolone and to discontinue eye drop Homatropine and eye drop Nepafenac. During the one-month follow-up, the patient’s best-corrected visual acuity was 6/24, and the intraocular pressure was under control (Table/Fig 7)d.

The patient was advised to undergo regular eye check-ups for monitoring and maintaining intraocular pressure.

Discussion

Aniridia is a rare disease (1), with an incidence of 1.8 per 100,000 births (2). It is usually bilateral and has both panocular (3) and systemic effects (4). In the majority of cases, aniridia occurs in an autosomal dominant pattern without any systemic associations due to mutations in the PAX6 gene (5). A few cases can also present as sporadic forms with a systemic associations, such as WAGR syndrome, caused by the deletion of the PAX6 gene and WT1 gene (4). The autosomal recessive pattern is seen in 1-3% of cases and is associated with systemic manifestations such as cerebellar ataxia along with intellectual disability, known as Gillespie syndrome (5).

It is important to note that individuals with WAGR syndrome typically have two or more of the following conditions: Wilm’s tumour, Aniridia, Genito-urinary abnormality, and a range of developmental delays. The phenotype is highly variable (6). However, it is also possible for someone to have WAGR syndrome without having all of these conditions. A case was reported where a boy was born with aniridia, cryptorchidism, and facial dysmorphism, and he developed Wilm’s tumour one year after birth (7). In contrast, in this case, there was aniridia at birth with no genital and facial abnormalities.

An atypical case of WAGR syndrome was reported where the patient had microphthalmos with microcornea and an absent anterior chamber, with un-descended testes, bilateral Wilm’s tumour, and mental retardation noted (8). In this case, there was aniridia with ectopia lentis, showing the diversity of presentations of WAGR syndrome. A newborn baby presented with facial dysmorphism, bilateral ptosis, down-slanted palpebral fissures, an epicanthal fold, cataract in the left eye, bilateral nystagmus with foveal hypoplasia, a depressed nasal bridge, a high palate, a post-operative scar of Wilm’s tumour, and bilateral post-axial polydactyly scars on the feet (9), whereas in this case, there was no presence of ptosis, epicanthal folds, or facial dysmorphism seen. There was no polydactyly in this case.

Wilm’s tumour occurs in about half of the cases of WAGR syndrome. The tumour usually develops between 1 to 3 years of age and is mostly detected by six years of age (10). In rare cases, it can occur late. In this case, the patient was not diagnosed with Wilm’s tumour nor had any signs of a tumour. Monitoring of signs can be done by periodic ultrasound and watching for symptoms.

In this case, the patient had congenital aniridia with a subluxated cataractous lens with raised intraocular pressure and foveal hypoplasia presenting as nystagmus, and the presence of hydro-ureteronephrosis unilaterally with borderline intellectual functioning.

There are two theories for raised intraocular pressure in aniridia. It is observed that in aniridia, the angle of the anterior chamber is open in the early years of life. However, as an individual approaches their second decade, they may experience angle closure due to the rotation of the rudimentary iris stump covering the trabecular meshwork with remnant iris tissue or due to the formation of peripheral anterior synechia, which can increase intraocular pressure (4). In this case, aniridia is associated with raised intraocular pressure with the presence of an iris stump seen on gonioscopic examination.

Foveal hypoplasia presenting with nystagmus can be due to phototoxicity as a result of iris maldevelopment or it can be secondary to a PAX6 mutation and is roughly present in 10% of patients with aniridia (11). In this case, there is the presence of foveal hypoplasia with nystagmus. The range of intellectual disability differs from person to person, ranging from mild to severe mental disability, and a few children may have normal intelligence (12). In the above case, the patient is having borderline intellectual functioning assessed using Malin’s intelligence scale for Indian children.

It is important to note that WAGR syndrome has been linked to multiple genito-urinary abnormalities such as cryptorchidism, ambiguous genitalia, streak ovaries, ureteric abnormalities, urethral strictures, duplicate ureters, horseshoe kidney, renal cysts, unilateral renal agenesis, and hypoplastic kidney (13). Due to this, it is recommended to undergo a thorough evaluation of the genito-urinary anatomy. In this case, there is asymptomatic right-sided hydro-ureteronephrosis.

Recent advances in aniridia correction with intraocular lens, such as Morcher aniridia ring segments, provide a pseudo-iris but do not correct aphakia (14). The Ophtech model 311 is a device used to correct both aniridia and aphakia (15). A special PMMA aniridia lens may also be used to correct both aphakia (post-operative) and aniridia. This device is designed as a 5.5 mm IOL optic that is clear, with an outer band containing pigmented PMMA where the optics act as a refracting surface and the outer band of pigmented surface acts as a pseudo-iris. The haptics have holes that allow for scleral fixation of the lens (16). Posterior chamber aniridia implants produce satisfactory results and are complication-free (17).

Conclusion

The severity of the disease can vary from person to person. It is important to undergo visual rehabilitation at an early stage to improve the quality of life. A systemic evaluation should be conducted to rule out any systemic associations with the disease. Genetic counseling is crucial as it raises awareness about the condition and its implications. Frequent eye check-ups are recommended to screen for glaucoma, and visual field tests should be conducted at regular intervals to prevent glaucoma.

References

1.
Landsend ECS, Lagali N, Utheim TP. Congenital aniridia - A comprehensive review of clinical features and therapeutic approaches. Surv Ophthalmol. 2021;66(6):1031- 50. Doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Mar 4. PMID: 33675823. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Berlin HS, Ritch R. The treatment of glaucoma secondary to aniridia. Mt Sinai J Med. 1981;48(2):111-15.
3.
Tibrewal S, Ratna R, Gour A, Agarkar S, Dubey S, Ganesh S, et al. Clinical and molecular aspects of congenital aniridia - A review of current concepts. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022;70(7):2280-92. Doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2255_21. PMID: 35791108; PMCID: PMC9426064. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Tripathy K, Salini B. Aniridia. [Updated 2023 Aug 25]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
5.
Calvão-Pires P, Santos-Silva R, Falcão-Reis F, Rocha-Sousa A. Congenital Aniridia: Clinic, genetics, therapeutics, and prognosis. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014;2014:305350. Doi: 10.1155/2014/305350. PMID: 27355034; PMCID: PMC4897488. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Hingorani M, Hanson I, van Heyningen V. Aniridia. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20(10):1011-17. Doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.100. Epub 2012 Jun 13. PMID: 22692063; PMCID: PMC3449076. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Starcevic´ M, Mataija M. WAGR syndrome--A case report. Acta Clin Croat. 2009;48(4):455-59. PMID: 20405644.
8.
Kawase E, Tanaka K, Honna T, Azuma N. A case of atypical WAGR syndrome with anterior segment anomaly and microphthalmos. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(12):1855-56.
9.
Koçak, Hatice and Gulay Ceylaner. “A WAGR syndrome case with postaxial polydactyly.” (2009). https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-WAGR-Syndrome- Case-with-Postaxial-Polydactyly-Ko%C3%A7ak-Ceylaner/7cd3ccbb9f3c806aa62 f97461731e4c98c426841.
10.
Leslie SW, Sajjad H, Murphy PB. Wilms Tumour. [Updated 2023 May 30]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK442004/.
11.
McCulley TJ, Mayer K, Dahr SS, Simpson J, Holland EJ. Aniridia and optic nerve hypoplasia. Eye (Lond). 2005;19(7):762-64. Doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701642. PMID: 15359227. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Mahale A, Poornima V, Shrestha M. WAGR syndrome--A case report. Nepal Med Coll J. 2007;9(2):138-40. PMID: 17899969.
13.
Shields LBE, Peppas DS, Rosenberg E. Bilateral aniridia and congenital ureteral valve: Role of genetic testing. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020;8(4):e1183. Doi: 11.1002/mgg3.1183. Epub 2020 Feb 14. PMID: 32056389; PMCID: PMC7196450. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Chung Marisa Y, Miller Kevin M, Weissman Barry A. Morcher iris reconstruction lens and rigid contact lens for traumatic Aniridia. Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice. 2009;35(2):108-10. | Doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e318199b00b. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Wang H, Jung J, Lin SR, Olson MD, Miller KM. Safety and efficacy of colored iris reconstruction lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;216:174-85. Doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2020.03.036. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Kumar DA, Agarwal A, Prakash G, Jacob S. Managing total aniridia with aphakia using a glued iris prosthesis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(5):864- 65. | Doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.03.009. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Johns KJ, O’Day DM. Posterior chamber intraocular lenses after extracapsular cataract extraction in patients with aniridia. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(11):1698- 702. Doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(91)32066-9.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/66990.19177

Date of Submission: Aug 10, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Oct 30, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jan 10, 2024
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 12, 2023
• Manual Googling: Nov 09, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Dec 26, 2023 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com