Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 160239

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : February | Volume : 18 | Issue : 2 | Page : FC06 - FC10 Full Version

Evaluation of Hyponatremia in Patients on Fluoxetine Therapy at a Psychiatry Outpatient Department in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: February 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/66718.19104
SA Abirami Balambika, R Nalini, Y Nisha Maheshwari, J Ezhilramya

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Tirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Tirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
R Nalini,
S2, Amazing Ark Apartment, 17th Cross Street, Maharajanagar, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli-627011, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: nalluprabha@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Fluoxetine is a widely used Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) for various psychiatric illnesses. Identifying patients at increased risk of developing hyponatremia is essential for safe and successful treatment.

Aim: To estimate the prevalence of hyponatremia in patients on fluoxetine therapy attending the Psychiatry Outpatient Department (OPD) at a tertiary care hospital and to compare the changes in serum sodium levels between patients younger than 55 years and those older than 55 years on fluoxetine therapy.

Materials and Methods: The present cross-sectional study was conducted in the Outpatient Psychiatry Department of Tirunelveli Medical College and Hospital, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India over three months, from October 2022 to December 2022. It included patients on fluoxetine therapy for various psychiatric illnesses. The type and duration of psychiatric illness, detailed drug history, and any history suggestive of symptoms of hyponatremia were documented. Blood samples were collected for serum sodium level monitoring. Adverse drug reactions to fluoxetine were recorded and assessed for causality, severity, and preventability using the World Health Organisation (WHO)-Uppsala Monitoring Centre causality assessment scale, the modified Hartwig and Siegel scale, and the modified Schumock and Thornton scale, respectively. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse baseline and demographic characteristics. The comparison of sodium levels between patients younger than 55 years and those older than 55 was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results: The mean age of the study participants being 41.03±13 years. The mean age of the males was 39±15.19 years, and that of the females was 42.05±12.29 years. A total of 30 participants were included in the study. Moderate depression was the most common condition for which fluoxetine was prescribed. Hyponatremia was present in 16.7% of the study participants. The median sodium level was 139±4.5 mEq/L in patients aged less than 55 years and 137±4 mEq/L in patients aged more than 55 years, with a p-value of 0.073. Among the reported adverse reactions, 64.5% were classified as possible, 67.74% as mild, and 58% as probably preventable.

Conclusion: Serum electrolyte monitoring is not routinely performed in all patients on fluoxetine. Therefore, relying solely on symptoms to detect hyponatremia may lead to underdiagnosis. Consequently, routine and frequent testing of serum sodium levels is recommended to prevent complications associated with hyponatremia.

Keywords

Adverse drug reactions, Causality assessment, Serotonin

Psychiatric disorders constitute a wide spectrum ranging from sub-clinical states to very severe forms and are one of the leading causes of non fatal disease burden in India (1). SSRIs are the most commonly prescribed drugs in a variety of psychiatric disorders, including depression, anxiety disorders, panic disorder, and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) (2). Among the SSRIs, fluoxetine is a well-established antidepressant known for its tolerability and safety advantages over tricyclic agents (3). It is well-tolerated, has better efficacy, fewer adverse effects, a longer half-life, good compliance, and a lower depression relapse rate after discontinuation, making it a preferred choice in elderly patients with depression. Serotonin-mediated effects on 5-HT (Hydroxytryptamine) and 5-HT1c receptors have been shown to induce the release of the anti-diuretic hormone, resulting in impaired water excretion and consequent water retention, leading to hyponatremia (4),(5). Recent studies have reported that hyponatremia and Syndrome of Inappropriate Anti-diuretic Hormone (SIADH) are more frequent in fluoxetine users than in users of other SSRIs (6).

Hyponatremia is usually defined as a plasma sodium level below 135 mEq/L (normal range 135-145 mEq/L) and is one of the most common electrolyte abnormalities encountered not only in hospitalised patients but also in routine psychiatric clinical practice (7). It can lead to adverse sequelae such as drowsiness, confusion, seizures, and even death (8). The incidence of hyponatremia in elderly patients treated with fluoxetine is 5/1000 per year, reaching a maximum of 8/1000 in elderly women (9). Hyponatremia and SIADH can cause complications such as seizure, coma, and rarely death in fluoxetine users (10). The risk of hyponatremia is much higher within the first 2-4 weeks of starting therapy, and this risk appears to diminish over time. By 3-6 months, the risk of hyponatremia is the same as for patients not taking antidepressants (11),(12). Identifying patients at increased risk for the development of hyponatremia is essential for the safe and successful treatment of psychiatric illnesses and for the prevention of treatment complications. There are not many studies on the occurrence of hyponatremia in present population (13),(14). Hence, the present study was conducted to evaluate hyponatremia in patients on fluoxetine therapy. The present study was aimed to estimate the prevalence of hyponatremia in patients on fluoxetine therapy attending the psychiatry Outpatient (OPD) at a tertiary care hospital and to compare the changes in serum sodium levels between patients younger than 55 years and those older than 55 years on fluoxetine therapy.

Material and Methods

The present cross-sectional study was conducted in the Outpatient Psychiatry Department of Tirunelveli Medical College and Hospital, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India over a period of three months, from October 2022 to December 2022. The study was carried out following approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (Ref No: 20222404 dated 28.09.2022, Tirunelveli Medical College). Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants in the local vernacular language before inclusion in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients who attended the psychiatric OPD during the study period and met the inclusion criteria were recruited.

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: Patients attending the psychiatry OPD, aged over 18 years, of any gender, and on fluoxetine therapy for various psychiatric illnesses were included in the study. Pregnant and lactating women, as well as, patients on drugs known to cause hyponatremia, such as lithium, diuretics, carbamazepine, calcium channel blockers, Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and laxatives, were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Patients of both genders who attended the Psychiatry OPD during the study period were selected by simple random sampling and enrolled in the study according to the inclusion criteria. Basic demographic details like age, gender, and occupation of the patients were recorded in their own language. The type and duration of psychiatric illness, detailed drug history, and history suggestive of symptoms like headache, irritability, dizziness, lethargy, muscle cramps, nausea, confusion, and seizures were inquired about, and blood samples were collected to compare serum sodium levels between individuals belonging to the age groups of less than 55 years and more than 55 years. The normal range of serum sodium levels is between 135 to 147 mEq/L (15). The occupations of all the study participants were categorised based on the modified Kuppuswamy scale (16). The WHO-UMC causality assessment was used to evaluate adverse events produced by fluoxetine therapy (17).

The severity of the reported Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) was assessed using the modified Hartwig and Siegel scale (18), which classifies ADRs into mild, moderate, and severe based on the clinical outcome. Here, a mild ADR is one where no change in treatment with the suspected drug is needed, and/or the suspected drug has to be held, discontinued, or needs to be changed, but no antidote or other treatment is required, and there is no increase in the length of stay. A moderate ADR is one that requires the treatment with the suspected drug to be held, discontinued, or changed without an increase in the length of hospital stay, or the ADR was the reason for hospitalisation for one day. A severe ADR is one that requires intensive medical care, causes permanent harm to the patient, or directly or indirectly leads to the patient’s death. The preventability of the ADRs was measured using the modified Schumock and Thornton scale (19), a free scale with a questionnaire based on clinical circumstances that has three sections: definitely preventable, probably preventable, and not preventable.

Statistical Analysis

The data collected were statistically analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 23.0. All the information was entered into a Microsoft excel sheet. Descriptive statistics were performed for baseline and demographic characteristics. Clinical diagnoses and the occurrence of hyponatremia were expressed in numbers and percentages. The Mann-Whitney U test, with a significance level of 0.05, was used to compare the median sodium levels between patients younger than 55 years and those older than 55 years. Adverse drug reactions were described using descriptive statistics, while their severity and preventability were expressed as percentages.

Results

A total of 30 patients attending the psychiatry OPD who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Among them, 10 (33.3%) were males and 20 (66.7%) were females, with the mean age of the study participants being 41.03±13 years. The mean age of the males was 39±15.19 years, and that of the females was 42.05±12.29 years. The majority of the study participants were in the age group of under 55 years {25 (33.3%)}. The duration of fluoxetine therapy for various psychiatric illnesses ranged from two weeks to two years. The demographic details revealed that 14 (46.7%) of the study participants were housewives, followed by 5 (16.7%) who were private employees (Table/Fig 1).

Among the 30 participants, the psychiatric illnesses for which fluoxetine was prescribed included moderate depression in 10 (33.3%) patients, followed by anxiety neurosis, paranoid schizophrenia, and mild depression in 4 (13.3%) patients each, obsessive-compulsive disorder and somatoform disorder in 3 (10%) patients each, and bipolar depression in 2 (6.6%) patients (Table/Fig 2). Diazepam was the most frequently prescribed concomitant medication, taken by 15 (37.5%) patients (Table/Fig 3). The table or figure shows the concomitant medications taken by the study participants.

The prevalence of hyponatremia among the study participants was 5 (16.7%) patients. Among these, 3 (60%) patients were females and 2 (40%) patients were males. In the age group of less than 55 years, 4 (16.7%) patients had serum sodium levels below 135 mEq/L. Similarly, in the age group of more than 55 years, 1 (20%) patient had serum sodium levels below 135 mEq/L (Table/Fig 4). The serum sodium levels ranged between 132 and 144 mEq/L in the age group of less than 55 years, while in the age group of more than 55 years, the levels ranged between 132 and 138 mEq/L.

The median sodium value for the age group of less than 55 years was 139±4.5 mEq/L, while for the age group of more than 55 years, it was 137±4 mEq/L. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the median sodium levels between the two age groups. At a 5% level of significance, there were no significant differences in the median sodium levels between the two age groups (p=0.073 >0.05) (Table/Fig 5).

A total of 31 Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) were recorded from 30 patients on fluoxetine therapy. The most common ADR reported was lethargy 5 (16.1%) occurrences, followed by headache, loss of appetite, myalgia, and fatiguability. The least common adverse effects were sleepiness 2 (6.4%) occurrences and muscle cramps and irritability 1 (3.2%) occurrence each (Table/Fig 6).

According to the WHO UMC causality assessment of ADRs in patients on fluoxetine therapy, 20 (64.5%) occurrences of the ADRs were possible, 11 (35.5%) occurrences were probable, and none of the ADRs were certain (Table/Fig 7). Based on the modified Hartwig and Siegel scale, 21 (67.74%) occurrences of the ADRs were mild, 10 (32.26%) occurrences were moderate, and there were no severe ADRs (Table/Fig 8). According to the modified Schumock and Thornton scale, 18 (58%) occurrences of the ADRs were probably preventable, while 13 (42%) occurrences were not preventable (Table/Fig 9).

Discussion

Hyponatremia is a recognised complication of antidepressant medication due to the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (19). Among antidepressants, fluoxetine is the most frequently used SSRI because of its efficacy, better tolerability, and favourable adverse effect profile. Although hyponatremia is believed to develop primarily in elderly patients, it can also occur in younger patients, and age does not seem to be a significant risk factor for hyponatremia in this population according to a study by Siegler EL et al., (20). Monitoring serum sodium levels helps in identifying patients at risk of developing hyponatremia. The present cross-sectional study was conducted in patients on fluoxetine therapy, and serum sodium values were measured in patients both younger and older than 55 years. Females constituted 66.7% of the study population, and a study by Malhotra S and Shah R, reveals that depression, anxiety, and unspecified psychiatric distress are more frequent in women (21).

In the study population, two-thirds of the participants were younger than 55 years, which is similar to the study by Gondek D et al., where middle-aged individuals are prone to psychological distress due to changes in the family environment, career, and increased responsibilities (22). Housewives made up 46.7% of the study population, which aligns with the study by Fernandes MC et al., (23). According to a study published in The Lancet by the India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative Mental Disorders Collaborators, the most common psychiatric illness is depression (33.8%), followed by anxiety disorders (19%), and the present study also showed a similar pattern (24). In this study, diazepam was the most frequently prescribed concomitant medication. The study by Lemberger L et al., indicated that pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions are minor and that dosage modification of either fluoxetine or diazepam was not necessary (25). A study revealed that patients treated with SSRIs developed hyponatremia more frequently in the older population (26). However, in the present study, hyponatremia was seen in both the under-55 years and over-55 years age groups. Studies have reported different frequencies of hyponatremia (25% to 50%) among fluoxetine users, and most of these studies are retrospective. The majority of studies have been conducted in elderly patients (27). Age-related susceptibility to hyponatremia may be due to physiological changes in renal and endocrine function. In a study by Liu BA et al., no association was found between the SSRI dose or the patient’s age and the onset time of hyponatremia (28). Various literature sources report symptoms such as headache, blurred vision, polydipsia, weakness, cramps, tremor, impaired gait, nausea, vomiting, seizures, confusion, and coma as indicative of hyponatremia. In the present study, adverse events reported included lethargy, headache, loss of appetite, myalgia, fatiguability, dizziness, and nausea, which was similar to the studies by Zhang X and Li XY and Cipriani A et al., (29),(30).

In a study by Edinoff AN et al., the most commonly reported side-effects of fluoxetine were sexual dysfunction, headache, and nausea (31). Many symptoms suggestive of hyponatremia are nonspecific and can be difficult to distinguish from the symptoms or signs of the person’s psychiatric illness, possibly leading to mismanagement (9). The adverse drug reactions were analysed using the WHO UMC causality assessment, and 64.5% were possibly related to fluoxetine, similar to a study where 67% of the results were possible (32). In the present study, most of the ADRs were mild (67.74%) and did not require discontinuation of drug therapy. A study by Sankhi S et al., showed that mild and moderate reactions accounted for 50.5% and 43.9%, respectively (33), while the study by Munoli S and Patil SB showed 78.96% as mild and 21.04% as moderate severity (34). When assessing preventability using the Modified Schumock and Thornton scale, 58% of the ADRs were probably preventable, similar to the study by Venkatasubbaiah M et al., (35). The strength of the study is that it presents evidence of hyponatremia in individuals younger than 55 years, although hyponatremia is traditionally associated with the elderly.

Limitation(s)

The limitation of the present study is that it is a cross-sectional study with a small sample size and a short duration, and baseline sodium values were not obtained. To overcome these limitations, it would be beneficial to conduct a multicentric, prospective study with a larger sample size over a longer duration. Additionally, measuring baseline serum sodium levels and monitoring serum sodium levels at frequent intervals would provide more comprehensive data.

Conclusion

Monitoring of serum electrolytes is not routinely performed in all patients on fluoxetine. Therefore, relying solely on symptoms to detect hyponatremia may lead to underdiagnosis. As a result, routine and frequent testing of serum sodium levels is recommended. Active surveillance enables healthcare professionals to detect ADRs early and intervene in a timely manner, thereby providing maximum benefit to the patients.

Acknowledgement

Authors would like to thank colleagues of the faculties of the Department of Pharmacology and Psychiatry of Tirunelveli Medical College and Hospital, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India for their constant support. The authors would also like to thank the patients included in the present study.

References

1.
Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation. Global Health Data Exchange (GHDx). http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool?params=gbd-api-2019-permalink/d780dffbe8a381b25e1416884959e88b.
2.
Blazer DG. Depression in late life: Review and commentary. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;58(3):249-65. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Upadhyay A, Jaber BL, Madias NE. Epidemiology of hyponatremia. Semin Nephrol. 2009;29(3):227-38. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Gandhi S, Shariff SZ, Al-Jaishi A, Reiss JP, Mamdani MM, Hackam DG, et al. Second-generation antidepressants and hyponatremia risk: A population-based cohort study of older adults. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017;69(1):87-96. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/246650-overview.
6.
Wilkinson TJ, Begg EJ, Winter AC, Sainsbury R. Incidence and risk factors for hyponatraemia following treatment with fluoxetine or paroxetine in elderly people. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999;47(2):211-17. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Greenblatt HK, Greenblatt DJ. Antidepressant-associated hyponatremia in the elderly. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2016;36(6):545-49. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Mannesse CK, Jansen PA, Van Marum RJ, Sival RC, Kok RM, Haffmans PJ, et al. Characteristics, prevalence, risk factors, and underlying mechanism of hyponatremia in elderly patients treated with antidepressants: A cross-sectional study. Maturitas. 2013;76(4):357-63. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Shakibaei F, Gholamrezaei A, Alikhani M, Talaeizadeh K. Serum sodium changes in fluoxetine users at different age groups. Iran J Psychiatry. 2010;5(3):113.
10.
Lane RM. SSRIs and hyponatraemia. Br J Clin Pract. 1997;51(3):144-46. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Coupland C, Dhiman P, Morriss R, Arthur A, Barton G, Hippisley-Cox J. Antidepressant use and risk of adverse outcomes in older people: Population based cohort study. BMJ. 2011;343:d4551. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Leth-Møller KB, Hansen AH, Torstensson M, Andersen SE, Ødum L, Gislasson G, et al. Antidepressants and the risk of hyponatremia: A Danish register-based population study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(5):e011200. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Sarkar S, Roy UK, Biswas S, Mallick AK, Mandal P. Clinico-biochemical study of the safety and tolerability of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI) with special reference to SSRI induced hyponatremia in humans and animals. J Clin Diagn Res. 2021;15(3):05-09. [crossref]
14.
Nambiar VK, Parvathy J, Philip TM, Abhijith K, Sreeni S, Panicker NK, et al. Fluoxetine or Venlafaxine for early post stroke depression. Neurology India. 2022;70(6):2407. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Serum Sodium: Reference Range, Interpretation, Collection and Panels. 2022 Oct 14.
16.
Ananthan VA. Modified Kuppuswamy scale for socioeconomic status of the Indian family-Update based on New CPI (IW) series from September 2020. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10(5):2048-49. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
https://who-umc.org/media/164200/who-umc-causality-assessment_new-logo.pdf. 2023 Oct 04.
18.
Hartwig SC, Siegel J, Schneider PJ. Preventability and severity assessment in reporting adverse drug reactions. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1992;49(9):2229-32. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Schumock GT, Thornton JP. Focusing on the preventability of adverse drug reactions. Hosp Pharm. 1992;27(6):538.
20.
Siegler EL, Tamres D, Berlin JA, Allen-Taylor L, Strom BL. Risk factors for the development of hyponatremia in psychiatric inpatients. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1995;155(9):953-57. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Malhotra S, Shah R. Women and mental health in India: An overview. Indian J Psychiatry. 2015;57(Suppl 2):S205. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Gondek D, Bann D, Patalay P, Goodman A, McElroy E, Richards M, et al. Psychological distress from early adulthood to early old age: Evidence from the 1946, 1958 and 1970 British birth cohorts. Psychological Medicine. 2022;52(8):1471-80. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Fernandes MC, Srinivasan K, Stein AL, Menezes G, Sumithra RS, Ramchandani PG. Assessing prenatal depression in the rural developing world: A comparison of two screening measures. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2011;14:209-16. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Sagar R, Dandona R, Gururaj G, Dhaliwal RS, Singh A, Ferrari A, et al. The burden of mental disorders across the states of India: The Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2017. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(2):148-61. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Lemberger L, Rowe H, Bosomworth JC, Tenbarge JB, Bergstrom RF. The effect of fluoxetine on the pharmacokinetics and psychomotor responses of diazepam. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1988;43(4):412-19. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Rottmann CN. SSRIs and the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion: Close monitoring of serum sodium levels in high-risk patients taking SSRIs can prevent this condition and the resulting hyponatremia, which can be lethal. AJN: Am J Nurs. 2007;107(1):51-58. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Sandhu HS, Gilles E, DeVita MV, Panagopoulos G, Michelis MF. Hyponatremia associated with large-bone fracture in elderly patients. Int Urol Nephrol. 2009;41(3):733-37. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Liu BA, Mittmann N, Knowles SR, Shear NH. Hyponatremia and the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone associated with the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: A review of spontaneous reports. CMAJ: Can Med Assoc J. 1996;155(5):519.
29.
Zhang X, Li XY. Prevalence of hyponatremia among older inpatients in a general hospital. Eur Geriatr Med. 2020;11(4):685-92. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Cipriani A, Brambilla P, Furukawa TA, Geddes J, Gregis M, Hotopf M, et al. Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005:(4):CD004185. [crossref]
31.
Edinoff AN, Akuly HA, Hanna TA, Ochoa CO, Patti SJ, Ghaffar YA, et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and adverse effects: A narrative review. Neurol Int. 2021;13(3):387-401. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Ambwani S, Dutta S, Mishra G, Lal H, Singh S, Charan J. Adverse drug reaction pattern of anti-depressant drugs prescribed in psychiatry out-patient department in a tertiary care hospital. Cureus. 2021;13(11): e19493. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Sankhi S, Marasine NR, Sankhi S, Lamichhane R. Adverse drug reaction due to antidepressants among patients with depression in a private psychiatric hospital of Nepal. Biomed Res Int. 2020:2020:6682928.[crossref][PubMed]
34.
Munoli S, Patil SB. Adverse drug reaction monitoring of antipsychotic drugs and mood stabilizers in a teaching hospital. Int J Pharmacol and Clin Sci. 2016;5(4):118-21. [crossref]
35.
Venkatasubbaiah M, Reddy PD, Satyanarayana SV. Analysis and reporting of adverse drug reactions at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Alex J Med. 2018;54(4):597-603.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/66718.19104

Date of Submission: Jul 25, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Sep 11, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Dec 26, 2023
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 26, 2023
• Manual Googling: Sep 19, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Dec 23, 2023 (21%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com