Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 123630

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : April | Volume : 18 | Issue : 4 | Page : XC01 - XC04 Full Version

Pathological Complete Response with Platinum Containing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-negative Breast Cancer: An Interventional Study


Published: April 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/65849.19320
Binila Mary Jose, VR Ajith Kumar, Suma Susan Meloot

1. Junior Resident, Department of Radiotherapy, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Radiotherapy, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Radiotherapy, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Suma Susan Meloot,
Assistant Professor, Department of Radiotherapy, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram-695011, Kerala, India.
E-mail: suma.sm2009@gmail.com.

Abstract

Introduction: Triple-negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) accounts for 20% of all breast cancer cases globally and responds well to cytotoxic chemotherapy. The standard Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC) regimen for TNBC includes 4+4 cycles of anthracycline, cyclophosphamide, and taxane. Integrating platinum agents into the NAC has gained attention as an effective treatment for TNBC.

Aim: To estimate the proportion of pathological Complete Response (pCR) in TNBC patients receiving platinum-based NAC.

Materials and Methods: This interventional study enrolled 73 non metastatic TNBC patients who attended the radiotherapy Outpatient Department (OPD) of Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram Kerala, India from April 2022 to April 2023. All patients underwent a complete history, physical examination, and tumour histopathology with Oestrogen Receptor (ER), Progesterone Receptor (PR) and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) receptor status assessment. Patients were treated with the NAC regimen: Epirubicin 90 mg/m2, Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 intravenously every three weeks for four cycles followed by Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, Carboplatin according to Area Under Curve (AUC)-5 by intravenous administration every three weeks for four cycles. Clinical response was evaluated after the completion of NAC using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria. pCR assessment was conducted postsurgery. Study variables were entered into Microsoft Excel, and the analysis was performed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0.

Results: Out of 73 patients with a mean age of 54.4 years, 33 (45.2%) patients showed complete response on clinical examination after eight cycles of Carboplatin-containing NAC, and 23 (31.5%) patients achieved pCR. Total 30 (41.1%) patients experienced complications during chemotherapy, with neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy being the most common, each occurring in 22 (30.1%) patients.

Conclusion: In present study, one-third of the patients achieved pCR with platinum-based NAC with an acceptable side-effect profile. It represents a beneficial treatment option for TNBC patients; however, the impact of pCR on survival requires further validation through long-term studies. Given the poor prognosis and limited treatment options for TNBC, the addition of affordable and available agents to the existing chemotherapy regimen could potentially revolutionise the treatment of these patients.

Keywords

Breast neoplasms, Carboplatin, Response evaluation criteria in solid tumours

Among Indian females, breast cancer has become the number one cancer, with an age-adjusted rate as high as 25.8 per 100,000 women and a mortality rate of 12.7 per 100,000 women (1). Globally, TNBC, characterised by the absence of expression of Oestrogen Receptor (ER), Progesterone Receptor (PR), and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2), accounts for 20% of all breast cancer cases. In the Indian scenario, this percentage is even higher, around 31% of all breast cancer cases. Currently, cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the only systemic treatment option for TNBC (2). Various experimental therapies have been developed as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC) for TNBC which could elicit better treatment response The standard NAC regimens for TNBC include 4+4 cycles of anthracycline, cyclophosphamide, and taxane. Recently, the integration of Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-damaging agents, such as platinum drugs, into NAC has garnered attention as a potentially effective treatment for TNBC. The mechanism of action of platinum analogs involves attacking cancer cells by inducing DNA double-strand breaks. BRCA1 (BReast CAncer gene1)-associated breast cancers and TNBC share common pathogenic features, with many TNBC patients exhibiting alterations in BRCA1 function. This suggests that TNBC may be highly sensitive to interstrand cross-linking agents. Pathological Complete Response (pCR), defined as the absence of residual cancer in the breast or lymph nodes following NAC surgery, has been associated with a reduced risk of systemic recurrence and serves as an effective biomarker of treatment response after NAC (3). A higher pCR is linked to improved clinical outcomes, including a decreased need for axillary surgery, increased likelihood of breast conservation surgery, and better recurrence-free survival rates (4). Therefore the quest for enhancing PCR has fueled interest in evaluation of neoadjuvant drugs ,with pCR following platinum containing chemotherapy as a primary endpoint in present study. Clinical response is assessed following the RECIST criteria 1.1 (5).

The primary objective of present study is to estimate the proportion of pCR after NAC for TNBC using platinum-containing compounds in patients attending the radiotherapy Outpatient Department during the study period. Additionally, the study aims to document treatment response according to RECIST criteria and record the incidence of adverse effects following treatment.

Material and Methods

This interventional study was conducted over a period of one year from April 2022 to April 2023. The study population included all patients with TNBC meeting the inclusion criteria and attending the radiotherapy Outpatient Department of Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India who were willing to participate in the study. Ethical considerations were taken into account, with Institutional Ethical Committee clearance obtained (IEC no: 03/17/2022/MCT), informed consent obtained from all participants, and confidentiality maintained throughout the study. The allocation of patients for neoadjuvant platinum-containing chemotherapy was done by the treating oncologist.

Inclusion criteria:

• Biopsy-proven cases of breast cancer that were ER, PR, and HER2 negative
• Stage II-III TNBC according to the Tumour Node Metastasis (TNM) staging (8th edition) (6)
• No history of previous cancer therapies
• Normal cardiac and renal function
• No co-morbidities precluding systemic chemotherapy/radiotherapy
• Normal bone marrow reserve
• Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores 0-2 (7).
• Patients less than 70 years of age
• Patients planned for the neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen: Epirubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Paclitaxel, and Carboplatin as per the treating doctor’s recommendation

Exclusion criteria:

• Patients with metastatic breast cancer
• Pregnant or nursing mothers
• Patients with bilateral breast cancers

Sample size calcualtion: The sample size was calculated based on the formula N=(1.96x1.96)PQ/I2, where ‘P’ is the prevalence, ‘Q’ is (100-P), and ‘I’ is the relative proportion of P P=58 (according to the parent study-BrighTNess trial in which 92 of 160 patients i.e., 58% showed complete pCR in the carboplatin-paclitaxel arm. Therefore n=69.54, sample size calculated was 73, considering a 5% dropout rate (8).

Study variables: Patient characteristics included age, co-morbidities and ECOG status (7). Tumour characteristics, and treatment characteristics were documented. Treatment response was assessed using RECIST criteria 1.1, and toxicity assessment was done using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V5.0 Nov 27, 2017 [5,9]. The main outcome studied was Pathological Complete Response (pCR).

Outcome measures: The pCR was defined as the absence of residual invasive and in situ cancer in the complete resected breast specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes following completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (10). Toxicity assessments were graded for neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, peripheral neuropathy, and vomiting based on severity levels.

Study Procedure

Patients meeting the selection criteria were enrolled in the study after obtaining informed consent. The baseline performance status of all patients was recorded according to ECOG guidelines. Treatment details and investigations were documented in a master file and proforma. All patients underwent a thorough evaluation, including a complete history, physical examination, and confirmation of triple-negative breast cancer status (ER, PR, HER2 negative). Metastatic disease activity was ruled out through appropriate investigations. Laboratory investigations, such as complete blood counts, renal function tests, liver function tests, electrolytes, and 24-hour urine creatinine clearance, were conducted. Tumours were staged according to TNM staging criteria.

Patients in the study received NAC with Epirubicin 90 mg/m2, Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 intravenously every three weeks for four cycles, followed by Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and Carboplatin according to AUC-5 intravenously every three weeks for four cycles (11). Any chemotherapy-related adverse events during the treatment cycles were noted. After completion of NAC, the disease was clinically reassessed, and treatment response was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Data were collected post-Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) from histopathology reports, and any pathologic complete response achieved was recorded.

Statistical Analysis

The data were entered into Excel and analysed using SPSS version 24.0 Categorical variables were presented as frequency and percentage. The association between categorical variables was assessed using the Chi-square test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 73 patients were included in the study and all of them were closely followed-up and available for response assessment.

A) Patient characteristics: In present study, most patients 33 (45%) were in the age group of 50-60 years, with a mean age of 54.4 years. All patients were female. The majority of 56 patients were postmenopausal (76.7%), 31 (42.5%) were hypertensive, and 30 (41.1%) were diabetic. Total 13 (13.7%) patients had a family history of breast cancer. Only patients with ECOG performance status of 0-2 were included in the study, with 60 (82.2%) having performance status 1.
B) Tumour characteristics: Most patients 41 (56%) had right-sided breast cancer, and the rest had left-sided disease. The majority of tumours were in the upper outer quadrant 43 (58.9%), followed by 16 (21.9%) in the lower outer quadrant and 14 (19.2%) in the upper inner quadrant. Most patients had invasive ductal carcinoma 41 (56.2%), with the remaining cases being invasive lobular carcinoma 25 (34.2%) and invasive carcinoma-NST 7 (9.6%). The majority were T3 stage 47 (64.4%), N1 stage 44 (60.3%), and non metastatic cases (Table/Fig 1). Composite staging showed 43.8% in stage IIIA, 28.8% in stage IIIB, 1.4% in stage IIIC, and 26% in stage IIB (Table/Fig 2).
C) Treatment-related factors: Total 30 (41.1%) patients developed one or more adverse events during chemotherapy, while 43 (58.9%) patients tolerated chemotherapy without adverse events (Table/Fig 3). Prophylactic Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (GCSF) was given to 42 (57.5%) patients. Total 95% patients had a complete clinical response, while 54.8% had a partial clinical response. Total 23 (31.5%) patients achieved a pCR following NAC.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC): All patients in the study underwent MRM following NAC and it was found that 23 patients achieved pCR that accounted for 31.5 percentage (with 95% confidence interval; 20.8-42.2) of patients. pCR was not obtained in the remaining 50 patients (68.5%). It was found that among the 33 patients who achieved complete clinical response as per RECIST, 23 of them achieved pCR (69.7%) whereas the remaining 10 patients (30.3%) did not. The association between clinical complete response and pCR was found to be statistically significant (p<0.001) (Table/Fig 4).

Factors Influencing Response to NAC:

A) Initial T stage and pCR: A statistically significant association was found between higher T stages and pCR (p=0.003) (Table/Fig 5).
B) Initial N stage and pCR: No statistically significant association was found between N stage and pCR (Table/Fig 6).
C) Initial composite stage and pCR: A statistically significant association was found between composite stage and pCR (p=0.001) (Table/Fig 7).
D) Menopausal status and pCR: No statistically significant association was found between menopausal status and pCR (Table/Fig 8).

Discussion

The TNBC is known for its aggressive nature and response to cytotoxic chemotherapy. NAC in TNBC has been extensively studied in clinical trials with the aim of achieving better outcomes, particularly in terms of achieving a pCR (12). In present study, which focused on estimating pCR in TNBC patients receiving platinum-based NAC, 73 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 54.4 years. A higher proportion of postmenopausal patients were included compared to other similar studies such as the GeparSixto trial, BrighTNess trial, and I-SPY 2 trial (8),(13),(14).

The tumour characteristics observed in present study were consistent with previous studies, with the majority of patients having stage II and III TNBC with invasive ductal carcinoma as the predominant histologic type. After completion of NAC, all 73 patients in the study showed a response, with 45% achieving a complete clinical response according to RECIST criteria. The study found a pCR rate of 31.5%, which was lower compared to a meta-analysis by Poggio F et al., that reported a pCR rate of 52% (12). However, the results were similar to an earlier study by Alba E et al., which also reported a pCR rate around 30% (11).
The chemotherapy schedule in present study was similar to that in the study by Alba E et al., involving four cycles of Anthracycline and Cyclophosphamide followed by Taxane and Carboplatin (11). The study size of 73 patients was smaller compared to other phase III studies, which may have impacted the results. Improved rates of pCR have been shown to have a positive impact on event-free survival and overall survival in TNBC patients, as demonstrated by previous studies (15). Anthracycline and taxane-based NAC have been associated with higher pCR rates and better survival outcomes in TNBC patients (16),(17).

Future studies may benefit from careful patient selection, including BRCA genetic mutation testing and molecular profiling, as well as making modifications to chemotherapy regimens, such as adding PARP inhibitors or immunotherapy to platinum-based NAC, which have shown promising results in achieving higher pCR rates in TNBC patients.

Limitation(s)

An important limitation of present study was its small sample size. Additionally, the absence of a control group hindered ability to assess the specific effect of adding carboplatin to the anthracycline-taxane backbone. Furthermore, due to financial and technical constraints, we were unable to conduct testing for BRCA mutation and molecular profiling, thereby limiting authors’ ability to study the impact of carboplatin in the BRCA mutated subtype with deficient DNA repair mechanisms.

Conclusion

One-third of patients in present study achieved a pCR with platinumbased NAC, with an acceptable side-effect profile, suggesting it as a beneficial treatment option for TNBC patients. However, further validation is needed to determine the impact of pCR on overall survival. The main limitations of present study were the small size of the cohort and the lack of a control group for comparison.

Acknowledgement

Authors extended their deep and sincere gratitude to all mentors for providing invaluable guidance throughout the study. Authors are grateful for the support of all the faculty members in the department who assisted in completing present study. Authors acknowledge the support from the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) team in preparing present manuscript.

References

1.
Malvia S, Bagadi SA, Dubey US, Saxena S. Epidemiology of breast cancer in Indian women. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2017;13(4):289-95. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Wang D, Feng J, Xu B. A meta-analysis of platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer. Future Oncol. 2019;15(23):2779-90. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Sparano JA. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer: Searching for more effectively curative therapies. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(3):293-95. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Berry DA, Hudis CA. Neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer as a basis for drug approval. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(7):875-86. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228-47. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 8th Edition. Wiley-Blackwell; December 2016;272.
7.
ECOG Performance Status Scale [Internet]. ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group. [cited 2023 Jan 17]. Available from: https://ecog-acrin.org/resources/ ecog-performance-status/.
8.
Loibl S, O’Shaughnessy J, Untch M, Sikov WM, Rugo HS, McKee MD, et al. Addition of the PARP inhibitor veliparib plus carboplatin or carboplatin alone to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (BrighTNess): A randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(4):497-509. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). November 27, 2017. Available from: https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_ applications/docs/ctcae_v5_quick_reference_5x7.pdf.
10.
Cortazar P, Geyer CE. Pathological complete response in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(5):1441-46. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Alba E, Chacon JI, Lluch A, Anton A, Estevez L, Cirauqui B, et al. A randomized phase II trial of platinum salts in basal-like breast cancer patients in the neoadjuvant setting. Results from the GEICAM/2006-03, multicenter study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;136(2):487-93. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Poggio F, Bruzzone M, Ceppi M, Pondé NF, La Valle G, Del Mastro L, et al. Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(7):1497-508. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
von Minckwitz G, Schneeweiss A, Loibl S, Salat C, Denkert C, Rezai M, et al. Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): A randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(7):747-56. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Rugo HS, Olopade OI, DeMichele A, Yau C, van ’t Veer LJ, Buxton MB, et al. Adaptive randomization of Veliparib-Carboplatin treatment in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(1):23-34. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Geyer CE, Sikov WM, Huober J, Rugo HS, Wolmark N, O’Shaughnessy J, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of addition of carboplatin with or without veliparib to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: 4-year follow-up data from BrighTNess, a randomized phase III trial. Annals of Oncology. 2022;33(4):384-94. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, Mehta K, Costantino JP, Wolmark N, et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: The CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014;384(9938):164-72. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Schmid P, Cortes J, Pusztai L, McArthur H, Kümmel S, Bergh J, et al. Pembrolizumab for early triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(9):810-21.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/65849.19320

Date of Submission: Jun 07, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Sep 02, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Feb 03, 2024
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 07, 2023
• Manual Googling: Sep 12, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Feb 01, 2024 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com