Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 32262

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : April | Volume : 18 | Issue : 4 | Page : FC06 - FC11 Full Version

Choice of Antiarrythmics used in Different Arrhythmias Encountered in Patients undergoing PTCA and Clinical Outcome: A Retrospective Observational Study


Published: April 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/67480.19337
Rashmi Singla, Minali Raja, Yogendra Singh

1. Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Government Doon Medical College, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Government Doon Medical College, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. 3. Director, Department of Cardiology, Max Hospital, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.

Correspondence Address :
Rashmi Singla,
734, Indranagar, Seemadwar, Dehradun-248006, Uttarakhand, India.
E-mail: singlarashmi@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA), is a minimally invasive procedure that opens blocked coronary arteries to improve blood flow to the heart muscle. It is indicated in angina patients unresponsive to maximal medical therapy and in ST elevated Myocardial Infarction (MI). A variety of arrhythmias and conduction disturbances can occur during and after Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCI), which can be risk factors for increased morbidity and mortality.

Aim: To evaluate the choice of antiarrhythmics use in different arrhythmias encountered in patients undergoing PTCA and to assess the outcome.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted by analysing the data of 139 patients aged between 40 to 70 years who underwent PTCA in the year 2023. The study was carried out over eight months from January 2023 to August 2023 at the Cardiology Department of Max Hospital, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India, located in Jakhan. All patients who underwent PTCA at Max Hospital, Dehradun (including stable and unstable angina patients not responding to medical therapy and Myocardial infarction cases), were included in the study. The sample size consisted of 139 patients aged 40 to 70 years who underwent PTCA. Age and gender ratios were considered as demographic factors. Computer records were reviewed for data collection. Additionally, the attending cardiologist was consulted for observations and the treatment plan followed. The outcomes were assessed at admission, after 10 days, and one and a half months, for all drugs. The collected data results were analysed in terms of percentage and mean.

Results: In the present study, the most common arrhythmias were ventricular premature complexes, occurring in all patients who underwent coronary angioplasty. The second most common arrhythmia was atrial fibrillation, present in 111 (80%) cases. The remainder consisted of atrial flutter 7 (5%), atrial tachycardia 1 (1%), Ventricular tachycardia 7 (5%), and ventricular fibrillation 0.6 (1%), as well as bradyarrhythmia/conduction defects in 69 (50%) cases. Drugs such as Amiodarone, Mexiletine, Lidocaine, Sotalol/Metoprolol, Flecainide, magnesium supplements, and Atropine were used based on the type of arrhythmias. The incidence of complications decreased at admission, after 10 days, one and half month, and the mortality rate decreased after the administration of all the drugs in the present study. Quality of life showed improvement.

Conclusion: The most common arrhythmias occurring after PTCA were reperfusion arrhythmias, which were mostly self-limiting and resolved without treatment. Amiodarone was the most commonly used drug for both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Mexiletine was used for Ventricular Tachycardia, Flecainide for supraventricular arrhythmias, and Lidocaine for ventricular tachycardia not responsive to Cordarone. β-blockers were well-tolerated drugs used concomitantly with other antiarrhythmic drugs. The use of antiarrhythmic reduced morbidity and mortality after PTCA and improved the quality of life score.

Keywords

Antiarrythmics, Arrythmias, Morbidity, Mortality, Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Cardiac arrhythmias are a class of conditions that describe abnormalities in the heart’s normal rhythm. They are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after coronary interventions and can lead to stroke, deterioration of ventricular function, and sudden cardiac death (1). Atrial fibrillation may be transient and without consequences, though it may lead to serious complications such as an increased risk of acute kidney injury, haemodynamic instability, cardiac failure, stroke, and death. A variety of tachyarrhythmias can occur during PCI. Lethal ventricular arrhythmias, including serious ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, have been reported to occur in 1.5-4.4% of patients undergoing coronary angioplasty (2). Of all patients who have an acute coronary syndrome, about 90% develop some form of cardiac arrhythmias. In 25% of patients, such rhythm abnormalities occur within the first 24 hours (3). Arrhythmias can cause hypotension, breathlessness, activity limitation, or cardiac failure. Abnormal automaticity or impaired conduction, or both, underlie cardiac arrhythmias. Ischaemia, electrolyte and pH imbalance, mechanical injury, stretching (due to heart failure), neurogenic and drug influences can cause arrhythmias by altering electrophysiological properties of cardiac fibres. Important mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias are ectopic pacemaker activity, early and after depolarisations, re-entry circuits (4). The widely used traditional-Vaughan Williams classification is based on electrophysiological therapy. Understanding the details of membrane action potential is crucial for both effective treatment and fewer side-effects. There are individualised recommendations for pharmacological therapy based on the patient’s characteristics. Reduction in renal and hepatic function may have important implications for antiarrhythmic therapy. Most of the antiarrhythmic may induce bradycardia or may cause Atrioventricular (AV) conduction block. Caution is warranted in all patients with a history of syncope, sinus bradycardia, or Atrioventricular (AV) conduction disturbances, including PR prolongation (5). Postoperative arrhythmias treatment depends on the type and severity of the arrhythmia. In some cases of arrhythmia, no treatment is necessary. The clinical significance of each arrhythmia depends on its duration, ventricular response rate, underlying cardiac function, and co-morbidities (6),(7). Treatment options include medications, lifestyle changes, invasive therapies, electrical devices, or surgery (8). A variety of drugs are available to treat arrhythmias. Because everyone is different, it may take trials of several medications and doses to find the one that works best. Various patient-related risk factors for postoperative arrhythmias are age, underlying structural heart disease, co-morbidities like obesity, previous stroke, and a history of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The surgery-related risk factors include trauma and inflammation, haemodynamic stress, ischaemic injury, preoperative use of beta-blockers and digoxin, electrolyte disturbances (9).

In view of the availability of antiarrhythmics with different mechanisms of action, there was a need to conduct a study in the patient population of Uttarakhand, specifically in the district of Dehradun at the multispecialty Max Hospital, to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the various drugs. This evaluation includes their benefits, contraindications, side effects, and dose modifications in patients with co-morbidities. The study aimed to determine the choice of antiarrhythmic use in different types of arrhythmias encountered in cardiac patients after PTCA in this area’s population, considering pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic criteria for usage, and to further investigate the outcomes after treatment of arrhythmias.

Material and Methods

A retrospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Cardiology, Max Hospital, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India, involving 139 patients in the age group of 40 to 70 years, who experienced post-PTCA arrhythmias. The study took place between January 2023 and August 2023, spanning a period of eight months. Data collection occurred from January 2023 to August 2023 for six months, and the results were analysed in the following two months, from July 2023 to August 2023.

Inclusion criteria: The study included all patients who underwent PTCA at Max Hospital Dehradun, including stable and unstable angina patients not responding to medical therapy, as well as cases of myocardial infarction.

Exclusion criteria: Patients who had pacemakers implanted were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: A total of 2800 patients were screened for PTCA arrhythmias over the study period, and patients available during the study duration were included using convenient sampling. A total of 139 patients admitted to the Coronary Care Unit (CCU) after undergoing PTCA were included in the study.

Study Procedure

The treatment data was collected from medical record files, and the outcomes were tabulated from the computerised saved data records. The results were analysed in terms of the types of post-PTCA arrhythmias, their incidence, clinically effective drugs, their dosages, side effects, contraindications and dose adjustment in comorbidities. According to hospital protocol, the endpoints after administering antiarrhythmics- such as shortness of breath, angina at rest/exertion at the time of admission were assessed. The incidence of complications like syncope, Acute Kidney Injury (AKI), Myocardial Infarction (MI), stroke leading to hospital readmissions, left ventricular dysfunction, and Electrocardiogram (ECG) improvement were evaluated in relation to morbidity after 10 days of admission. This information was obtained through verbal discussions with the cardiologist. Additionally, the outcomes were analysed in terms of total hospital stay time, episodes of sudden cardiac death and mortality, and quality of life, which were assessed within one and a half months of admission. This periodic assessment was conducted following hospital protocol, and the cardiologist was consulted for outcome information.

Tools such as the Medical Research Grading (MRC) of dysnoea (10), Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina grading (11), Dukes treadmill score (12), and the Quality of Life Questionnaire (13) were used to assess the improvement in quality of life with the use of antiarrhythmic.

Assessment of Quality of Life: It was assessed by:

A. MRC-Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea scale (10): The mMRC breathlessness scale ranges from grade 0 to 4.

B. Angina Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading (11):

• Angina with strenuous exertion.
• Angina with moderate exertion like walking or climbing stairs rapidly, walking uphill or in cold or wind, or emotional stress.
• Angina with mild exertion like walking one or two blocks on the level and climbing one flight of stairs at a normal pace.
• Angina with any level of physical exertion.Angina with any level of physical exertion.

C. Treadmill exercise test-Dukes treadmill score (12): The Duke treadmill score is calculated as follows: DTS=exercise time in minutes (5x ST elevation in mm)-(4x exercise angina) (where 0=no angina, 1=non limiting angina, 2=exercise-limiting angina) (5xST segment deviation in mm )-4x angina index. A Duke treadmill score of 5 indicates low risk for cardiovascular events (predicted 4-year survival was 99%). Individuals in this population do not require further investigation with coronary angiography. A score of less than -10 indicates high risk for cardiovascular events (predicted 4-year survival was 79%). These patients require further investigation with coronary angiography. A score between 4 and -10 indicates intermediate risk.

Quality of Life in Cardiovascular Surgery (QLCS) questionnaire: This questionnaire asks for the patient’s opinion about their health, how they feel, and their ability to perform daily activities in the last 45 days. Patients are asked to rate their responses on a scale of 1 to 5 (1=Too Bad, 2=Bad, 3=Good, 4=Very Good, 5=Great) for the following questions:

1. How is the patient’s performance in daily activities/work/school?
2. How is the patient’s health after surgery?
3. How is the patient’s physical capacity after surgery?
4. From an emotional point of view, how is the patient feeling?
5. In the relationship with family members, how is the patient feeling? Total: ____/25.

Statistical Analysis

The data was represented in Microsoft excel, statistically in terms of percentages and numbers. The Chi-square test was applied to assess the association between hospital stay and four outcomes: syncope episodes, recurring hospital admissions due to complications, ECG improvement cases, and left ventricular function improvement cases. The level of significance considered was p <0.05.

Results

Age and gender-related demographic data were presented in (Table/Fig 1). The majority of patients who underwent PTCA were in the age group of 50-60 years, accounting for 83 (59.71%) cases, with 28 patients (20%) each from the age groups of 40-50 and 60-70 years.

In (Table/Fig 2), reperfusion arrhythmias were observed in all 139 cases, and they spontaneously resolved. Supraventricular arrhythmias included atrial fibrillation in 111 (79.85%) cases, atrial flutter in 7 (5%) cases, and atrial tachycardia in 1 (0.7%) case. These were treated with oral amiodarone or by infusion. Other drugs used were esmolol administered by intravenous infusion and oral sotalol. Ventricular tachycardia occurred in 5% of cases and was treated with slow intravenous Mexiletine or lignocaine infusion, or oral flecainide. Conduction defects were found in 50% of cases, which either resolved spontaneously or were treated with atropine. Ventricular fibrillation was present in 1% of cases and was treated with amiodarone or lignocaine. Torsades de pointes had a rare incidence, occurring in only 1% of cases, and were treated with intravenous magnesium sulphate.

As detailed in (Table/Fig 3), Amiodarone is a broad-spectrum drug used in various arrhythmias. Lignocaine is the least cardiotoxic with no proarrhythmic properties. Flecainide is used in nodal tachycardia. Beta-blockers such as esmolol and sotalol are well-tolerated drugs. Patients on amiodarone need to undergo testing for thyroid hormones. Mexiletene treatment requires liver function tests. Mexiletene is contraindicated in AV block, while Flecainide is not administered in cases of cardiac failure, sick sinus syndrome, or myocardial infarction. Sotalol should not be given to patients with a prolonged QT interval. All conduction blocking agents are contraindicated with amiodarone, lignocaine, and magnesium supplements.

Shortness of breath was most commonly observed in 42 (30%) cases with supraventricular arrhythmias. Angina was predominantly present in 125 (90%) cases with ventricular premature beats and 97 (70%) cases with ventricular tachycardia (Table/Fig 4)a.

In hospital stays of less than 7 days, syncopal episodes were only reported in 1 (0.7%) case of patients on beta blockers. Incidences of complications leading to hospital readmissions, such as myocardial infarction, stroke, and acute kidney injury, were found in only 14 (10%) cases. Improvement in Left Ventricular Function (LVF) was observed in 14 (10%) patients after 10 days post PTCA, with ECG improvement seen in 88 (63%) cases. For hospital stays exceeding 7 days, syncopal episodes were reported in 2 (1.4%) cases, recurring hospital admissions in 18 (13%) cases, LVF improvement in 10 (7.1%) cases, and ECG improvement in 30 (21%) cases (Table/Fig 4)b.

The Chi-square test was utilised to determine the association between hospital stay duration and follow-up endpoints. The Chi-square values for the respective outcomes were 2.26 (p-value=0.132), 16.36 (p-value=0.000), 2.68 (p-value=0.101), and 2.66 (p-value=0.103). A statistically significant association was found between hospital stay duration and recurrent hospital admissions, as indicated by a p-value of 0.000 for th Chi-square value of 16.36. For the rest of the outcomes, no significant associations were observed.

The incidence of sudden cardiac death was 1-2 (0.7%), mortality 10 days after was 1 (0.7%), and within one and a half months was 7 (5%). The overall quality of life was assessed for all sample patients (Table/Fig 5)a.

According to (Table/Fig 5)b, the improvement in quality of life for all patients was graded based on the presence of dysapnoea, angina, treadmill test scores, MRC grading of dyspnoea (grade-1), Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina grade (2 or 3), Duke treadmill score (low-risk score >5), and questionnaire method (grade 3-good).

Discussion

The PCI has been the fastest-growing major invasive procedure in the past decade. Along with its obvious benefits, there are certain risks, including cardiac arrhythmias. A variety of arrhythmias and conduction disturbances can occur during PCI.

In the present study, according to the data in (Table/Fig 1), the most common age group that underwent PTCA was 50-60 years, while the rest of the age groups, from 40-50 years and 60-70 years, accounted for 20% of the sample population. As shown in (Table/Fig 3), 70% were males and 30% were females. The most common arrhythmia was ventricular premature complexes, which occurred in all patients who underwent coronary angioplasty. It is a manifestation of reperfusion arrhythmias. Similarly, in a previous study, the most frequently observed arrhythmias were reperfusion arrhythmias after revascularisation procedures during acute myocardial infarction (14). The second most common arrhythmia was atrial fibrillation, occurring in 80% of cases. Atrial fibrillation usually occurs with inferior wall ischaemia, but lately, it can also occur in patients with electrolyte imbalances (15). The third most common arrhythmia was atrial flutter, occurring in 5% of cases. Atrial tachycardia, observed in 1% of cases, is uncommon. Ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation were seen in 5% and 0.5% of cases, respectively. According to a study by Mehta RH et al., lethal ventricular arrhythmias, including serious Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) and Ventricular Fibrillation (VF), have been reported to occur in 1.5-4% of patients undergoing coronary angioplasty (16). In the present study, bradyarrhythmias/conduction defects were observed in 50% of cases, mostly transient in nature. Left bundle branch block was the most common conduction defect, followed by 1st degree and 3rd degree AV block. In a study by Gorenek B, new conduction defects occurred in only 0.9% of patients undergoing coronary angioplasty (17). Of these, right bundle branch block was the most common, followed by 1st degree AV block. Ventricular premature complexes resolves by themselves and required no treatment. Similarly most of the conduction defects like bradycardia and AV blocks resolved spontaneously. Left bundle branch block also required no treatment.

Antiarrhythmics (17): Amiodarone-It is a class III drug that widens the action potential. Resistant VT and recurrent VF are the most important indications for its use. The i.v. infusion rapidly terminates ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias. It is administered once a day due to its very slow elimination, and the recurrence of arrhythmias does not occur if 1-2 doses are missed. It is considered safe in hepatic, renal, and cardiac dysfunction. The only side-effects to be monitored are related to thyroid function tests to detect hypo/hyperthyroidism. In a study by Galperin J et al., oral Amiodarone similarly restored sinus rhythm in 1/3 of patients with atrial fibrillation, increased the success rate of electric cardioversion, decreased the number of relapses, and delayed their occurrence (18). In another study by Tuseth SV et al., high-dose i.v. amiodarone maintenance treatment of 100 mg/hr following a loading dose of 300 mg/min represented effective treatment in atrial fibrillation/flutter (19).

Mexiletine: It is a sodium channel blocker, a class Ib drug that blocks more in the activated state. It is used in ventricular arrhythmias not responding to lignocaine and in ventricular tachycardia. Dose adjustment is required in liver dysfunction as it is metabolised by the liver. Hepatic function monitoring is necessary. In a study (20), patients with refractory VT and amiodarone use showed a significant reduction in sustained VT/VF when treated with mexiletine. In another study by Gao D et al., patients with refractory VT on amiodarone therapy underwent the addition of mexiletine (21).

Lignocaine: It is a sodium channel blocker, a class Ib drug. It is used for the acute termination of ventricular arrhythmias via the i.v. route. To maintain therapeutic plasma concentration, a loading dose is required followed by maintenance i.v. infusion. Dose adjustment is necessary in hepatic dysfunction as it is metabolised by the liver after redistribution. In a study by Yasmeen M et al., lidocaine i.v. in an average dose of 1.5 mg/kg in 30 sec was effective in suppressing ventricular arrhythmias in 80% of cases (22).

Flecainide: It is a class Ic drug, the most potent Na+ channel blocker with a more prominent action on the open state. It is used in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and in any condition leading to tachycardia. It is utilised in arrhythmia without any heart disease as it has arrhythmogenic potential. In a study, it is recommended as one of the first-line therapies for pharmacological conversion as well as maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation and/or supraventricular tachycardias without structural heart disease (23).

Beta blockers: Well-tolerated drugs like sotalol, esmolol, and metoprolol had no accompanying side-effects, drug interactions, or dose adjustments. B blockers can be used alone or with other antiarrhythmics. Metolar XR was used at doses of 12.5 mg or 25 mg twice a day. The initial dose of sotalol was 80 mg twice daily, with a gradual titration to 240 mg per day. The drug was discontinued if the heart rate was <65 or blood pressure was <120/80. Sotalol was contraindicated in patients with a long QT interval due to the risk of causing torsades de pointes. Sotalol was used for ventricular tachycardia and to maintain sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation/flutter.

It was more effective for arrhythmias where other beta blockers didn’t work due to its additional potassium channel blocking action, leading to the prolongation of the action potential. Esmolol was used as an i.v. infusion in emergencies to control ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation/flutter and supraventricular tachycardia. In a study by Mary-Rabine L et al., (24), sotalol was effective in suppressing ventricular premature complexes, non sustained, and sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. In a study by Nergårdh AK et al., the treatment strategy of metoprolol CR before cardioversion in combination with prompt second cardioversion in case of early relapse of atrial fibrillation significantly increased the proportion of patients in sinus rhythm during six months of follow-up (25).

Atropine- is an anticholinergic drug used to correct sinus bradycardia and type 2 and 3 AV blocks. Atropine increases heart rate and improves AV conduction by blocking vagal influences on the heart. In a study by Scheinman, Thorburn and Abott , 56 patients with acute MI complicated by sinus bradycardia were treated with iv atropine and monitored in coronary care unit. Atropine administration was associated with improved AV conduction in 11 of 13 (85%) patients with acute inferior MI associated with 2nd or 3rd degree atrioventricular block. Ventricular tachycardia was one of significant side effects (26).

Magnesium sulphate: Given to correct underlying hypokalemia, it was administered as a 50% injection of 2 mL i.v. twice a day. In a study by Ramesh T et al., i.v. magnesium, 5g or less, was administered in conjunction with standard care (27). Similarly, it was effective for rate control and modestly effective for the restoration of sinus rhythm in rapid atrial fibrillation without clinically significant side-effects.

Sudden cardiac death occurred in 1% of cases, with mortality rates of 1% after 10 days of admission and 5% within one and a half months of admission. In a study by Brediau CE et al., no complications were recorded in 3116 (89%) cases, isolated minor complications occurred in 241 (6.9%), and major complications (emergency surgery, myocardial infarction, death) were observed in 145 (4.1%). The overall myocardial infarction rate was 94/3500 (2.6%). There were two non surgical deaths, giving a total mortality rate of 4/3500 (0.1%) (28). Additionally, , in another study compared with a median length of hospital stay of 2.0 days after PTCA for the entire cohort of patients, the length of stay was more strikingly increased in patients who experienced major or minor PTCA complications, such as emergency bypass surgery {9.0 days (8.0, 18.0); p-value <0.001}, Q-wave or non Q-wave myocardial infarction {8.0 (6.0, 15.5); p-value <0.001}, transfusion unrelated to bypass surgery {8.0 (4.0, 12.0); p-value <0.001}, or abrupt vessel closure {6.0 (3.0, 10.5); p-value <0.001} (29).

The quality of life was assessed as per [Table/Fig-5b], based on the breathlessness grade as follows: Grade 1- patients experienced breathlessness on strenuous exercise and more than daily routine activity; Angina Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading, Grade 11- patient had angina with moderate exertion like walking or climbing stairs rapidly, walking uphill or in cold or wind; or Grade 111- patient had angina with mild exertion like walking one or two blocks on the level and climbing one flight of stairs at a normal pace, and had a treadmill exercise score >5, indicating a low risk of cardiovascular disease. The Quality of Life Questionnaire in terms of the patient’s performance in daily activities, the patient’s health, the patient’s physical capacity, emotional well-being, self-confidence, self-esteem, interest in life, and the relationship with family members were assessed as good-grade 3. The observations of this study warrant a large multicentre observational study of patients who underwent coronary angioplasty at a tertiary care centre to investigate the most common arrhythmias after interventions and devise strategies to identify and treat them. Currently, Cordarone is the most common antiarrhythmic drug being used, which has adverse effects on the thyroid, eyes, and lungs. Safer antiarrhythmics for atrial fibrillation like ibutilide/dofetilide should be used more frequently to avoid these side-effects.

Limitation(s)

The present is a single-centre observational study done in a specific subset of patients; hence, the application of results to other diseased populations remains questionable.

Conclusion

Ventricular premature beats, supraventricular arrhythmias, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, and conduction disturbance arrhythmias are the arrhythmias that generally occur after PTCA. Atrial fibrillation accounts for 80% of all arrhythmias that have occurred in 139 cases. Amiodarone is a broad-spectrum, highly efficacious drug used in almost all types of arrhythmias. Lidocaine and esmolol were used as i.v. infusions in ventricular and atrial arrhythmias, respectively. Beta-blockers were well-tolerated drugs with sotalol being contraindicated in cases of prolonged QT interval. Magnesium supplements were given to correct the reversible underlying cause of hypokalemia. With the judicious use of antiarrhythmics, life-threatening complications can be avoided post surgery, and the duration of hospital stay is reduced, leading to an improvement in the quality of life.

References

1.
Klabunde RE. Arrythmias. cardiovascular physiology concepts. Richard E Klabunde (ed): 3rd edition, Wolter kluwer, 2021:7 chapters.
2.
Yeung-Lai-Wah JA, Qi A, McNeill E, Abel JG, Tung S, Humphries KH. New Onset Sustained: New-onset sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation early after cardiac operations. Ann Thoracic Surg. 2004;77(6):2083-88. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Salaminia S, Sayehmiri F, Angha P, Sayehmiri K, Motedayen M. Evaluating the effect of magnesium supplementation and cardiac arrythmias after acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review & meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015;18(1):129. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Tripathi KD. Antiarrythmic drugs. Essentials of Medical Pharmacology. 8th edition. New Delhi: Jaypee Publishers. 2019; Pp.571-83.
5.
Gregory SK, Goyal A, Grigorova Y, Hashmi MF. Antiarrhythmic medications. 2023 Feb 19. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482322/
6.
Peretto G, Durante A, Limite LR, Cianflone D. postoperative arrhythmias after cardiac surgery: Incidence, risk factors, and therapeutic management. Cardiol Res Pract. 2014;2014:615987. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/615987. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Herzog L, Lynch C. Arrhythmias accompanying cardiac surgery. In: Lynch C, editor. Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology. 3rd edition. Philadelphia, Pa, USA: JB Lippincott; 1994. pp. 231.
8.
Mathew JP, Fontes ML, Tudor IC, Ramsay J, Duke P, Mazer CD, et al. A multicenter risk index for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2004;291(14):1720-29. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Creswell LL, Schuessler RB, Rosenbloom M, Cox JL. Hazards of postoperative atrial arrhythmias. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56(3):539-49. PubMed. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Primary care respiratory society. MRC Dysnoea scale. Last retrieved on 5 Jan 2024. Available from: https://www.pcrs-uk.org/mrc-dyspnoea-scale.
11.
Campeau L. Grading of angina pectoris. Circulation. 1976;54(3):522. Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/epdf/10.1161/circ.54.3.947585. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Mark DB. Duke Treadmill Score [Internet]. Last retrieved on 5 Jan 2024. Available from: https://www.mdcalc.com/calc/3991/duke-treadmill-score#creator-insights.
13.
Bond MMK, Oliveira JLR, Souza LCB, Farsky PS, Amato VL, Togna DJD, et al. Quality of life in cardiovascular surgery: Elaboration and initial internal validation of a quality of life questionnare. J Cardiovascular Surgery. 2018;33(5):476-82. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Tatli E, Guray A, Ali B, Mustafa YM. Arrhythmias following revascularization procedures in the course of acute myocardial infarction: Are they indicators of reperfusion or ongoing ischemia? The Scientific World Journal. 2013;2013:01-07. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Circulation. 2014;130(23):2071-104. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Mehta RH, Starr AZ, Lopes RD. Incidence & outcomes associated with ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in patients undergoing primary pervutaneous intervention. JAMA. 2009;301(17):1779-89. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Gorenek B. Management of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Post-PCI Patients. In: Gulizia, M.M. (eds) Emerging Pathologies in Cardiology. Springer, Milano . 2005: 231–39. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0341-5_27. Last retrieved on 1.2.2023. [crossref]
18.
Galperín J, Elizari MV, Chiale PA, Molina RT, Ledesma R, Scapín AO, et al. Efficacy of Amiodarone for termination of chronic atrial fibrillation and maintenance of sinus rhythm: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, double blind trial. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2001;6(4):341-50. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Tuseth SV, Jaatun HJ, Dickstein K. Amiodarone infusion in the treatment of acute AF/Fl: High versus low dose treatment. Heart J. 2005;91(7):964-65. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Sobeich M, Lewandowski M, Zaja D, Macia? g A, Syska P, Ateńska-Pawlowska J, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of mexiletine treatment in patients with recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks. Kardiol Pol J. 2017;75(10):1027-32.[crossref][PubMed]
21.
Gao D, Van HH, Alshengeiti L, Dorian P, Mangat I, Korley V, et al. Mexiletine as an adjunctive therapy to amiodarone reduces the frequency of ventricular tachyarrhythmia events in patients with an implantable defibrillator. J Cardiovasc Pharacol. 2013;62(2):199-204. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Daraz YM, Abdelghffar OH. Lidocaine infusion: An antiarrhythmic with neurologic toxicities. Cureus. 2022;14(3)e23310. [crossref]
23.
Andrikopoulos GK, Pastromas S, Tzeis S. Flecainide: Current status & perspectives in arrythmia management. World J Cardiol. 2015;7(2):76-85. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Mary-Rabine L, Soumagne D, Stiels B. Long-term sotalol therapy in patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Acta cardiol. 1986;41(2):89-97.
25.
Nergårdh AK, Rosenqvist M, Nordlander R, Mats Frick M. Maintenance of sinus rhythm with metoprolol CR initiated before cardioversion and repeated cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(11):1351-57. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Scheinman MM, Thorburn D, Abott JA. Use of atropine in patients with acute myocardial infarction and sinus bradycardia. Circulation. 1975;52:627-33. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Ramesh T, Lee PYK, Mitta M, Allencherril J. Intavenous magnesium in the management of rapid atrial fibrillation. J Cardiol. 2021;78(5):375-81. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Brediau CE, Roubin GS, Leimgrub PP, Douglas JS, King SB, Gruentzig AR. In hospital mortality in patients undergoing elective coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1985;72(5):1044-52. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Wolfe MW, Roubin GS, Schweiger M, Isner JM, Ferguson JJ, Cannon AD, et al. Length of hospital stay and complications after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Clinical and procedural predictors. Heparin Registry Investigators. Circulation. 1995;92(3):311-19.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/67480.19337

Date of Submission: Sep 11, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Nov 30, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Mar 08, 2024
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? No
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 12, 2023
• Manual Googling: Dec 12, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Mar 06, 2024 (17%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com