Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 103415

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2023 | Month : September | Volume : 17 | Issue : 9 | Page : OD05 - OD08 Full Version

Treatment Dilemma in an Unusual Case of Dengue Fever with Cardiomyopathy and Nephropathy: A Case Report


Published: September 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63898.18449
Somnath Maitra, Ratul Seal, Koushik Ray

1. Professor, Department of General Medicine, Jagannath Gupta Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital (JIMSH), Budge, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of General Medicine, Jagannath Gupta Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital (JIMSH), Budge, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Jagannath Gupta Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital (JIMSH), Budge, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Somnath Maitra,
E/657 B, Baghajatin Pally, P.O-Baghajatin, Kolkata-700086, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: somnathmaitra2015@gmail.com

Abstract

Dengue is a viral illness in humans caused by the bite of infected Aedes mosquitoes, mostly Aedes aegypti and also Aedes albopictus. There are four serotypes of the Dengue virus that cause infection in humans and may lead to a variety of complications. Myocarditis and cardiomyopathy can occur in several viral and non viral infections, increasing morbidity and mortality. Nephropathy may also arise in dengue fever, causing complications. The case presented here involved both complications, nephropathy and cardiomyopathy, posing treatment challenges in terms of altering fluid and electrolyte status, which hindered fluid therapy as fluid overload would be detrimental. However, the complications were reversible with the normalisation of echocardiography and urea and creatinine levels. Long-term follow-up is necessary to monitor cardiac and renal function, as some patients may progress to Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). The patient presented with fever, headache, vomiting, and haematuria, along with signs of fluid overload. There was a past history of fever, and since both Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM Dengue antibodies were positive, this may be a case of a second episode of dengue fever causing complications. This case report emphasises the diagnostic and treatment challenges in a dengue patient with cardiomyopathy and nephropathy, where excessive fluid replacement may increase morbidity and mortality. Additionally, long-term follow-up of these patients is necessary.

Keywords

Expanded dengue syndrome, Multiorgan failure, Severe dengue

Case Report

A 31-year-old non diabetic, non hypertensive female with no known addiction and last menstrual period 15 days before presented with fever and headache for the past 15 days, along with vomiting and haematuria for the past 13 days, as well as facial puffiness and pedal oedema for the past 12 days. The fever was high-grade, intermittent, accompanied by chills and rigors, without any complaints of bladder or bowel issues, abdominal pain, or rash. The patient experienced body aches without any history of arthralgia or arthritis. Facial puffiness followed by pedal oedema developed, with the puffiness worsening in the early morning. There was no history of photosensitivity, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnoea, yellowish discoloration of eyes or urine. The patient did not take any Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) or other medications prior to this episode, and there was no history of allergies or immunisations. Although there was a history of indoor air pollution, there was no history of travel or visits to agricultural lands. The significant past history included an undocumented febrile illness three years ago, which resolved within five days with over-the-counter medication.

The patient visited her family physician on the 3rd day of the current febrile episode, who ordered a battery of investigations including routine blood and urine tests, malaria antigen test, dengue NS1, and IgM and IgM typhoid antibody tests. Remarkable findings included mild anaemia (haemoglobin 10.6 g/dL), thrombocytopenia (manual platelet count 110 * 103/cumm), and positive Dengue viral antigen (NS1).

During examination, the patient was conscious, alert, and cooperative. Facial puffiness was present with orthopnoea. There was mild pallor without any icterus, cyanosis, or clubbing. Lymph nodes were not palpable, and the jugular venous pulse was engorged and pulsatile. Bilateral pitting pedal oedema was observed. The pulse rate was 110/min, low volume, with a blood pressure of 90/60 mmHg. The respiratory rate was 29/min, thoracoabdominal. The temperature was 101°F with no skin rash. There were no signs of micronutrient deficiency.

Systemic examination revealed no hepatosplenomegaly, ascites, or abdominal tenderness. The apex was down and out with a hypokinetic nature. Fine end inspiratory crepitations were heard bilaterally at the lung bases. The neck was supple without any signs of meningeal irritation, and no abnormalities were detected in the examination of the neurological and rheumatology systems.

A provisional diagnosis of dengue viral fever with secondary bacterial infection, sepsis, and nephropathy was made. The patient was placed in a propped-up bed and provided moist oxygen delivery at 5 L/min. Noradrenaline was administered via intravenous infusion at a rate of 0.1 μg/kg/min due to persistently low mean arterial pressure below 60 mmHg. No intravenous fluids were given as there was volume overload detected on echocardiography, indicated by Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) collapsibility criteria. Global hypokinesia and an Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) of 35% without pericardial effusion were also observed. Arterial blood gas analysis revealed metabolic acidosis with low bicarbonate levels. The relevant investigation findings are mentioned below (Table/Fig 1).

Blood culture and sensitivity tests were performed, along with urine routine examination and culture sensitivity. Chest X-ray revealed pulmonary oedema (Table/Fig 2) with bilateral mild pleural effusion. Calcium, magnesium, and phosphate levels were normal, as were the levels of Troponin I, Creatine Phosphokinase (CPK) , and CPK-MB. The Electrocardiography (ECG) showed sinus tachycardia. Blood samples were sent for Malaria parasite slide and dual antigen testing, IgG and IgM Dengue antibodies, Typhi Dot M, Leptospira IgM antibodies, and Scrub Typhus IgM antibodies.

The patient was treated with intravenous proton pump inhibitor, ondansetron, and a furosemide infusion at a rate of 60 mg/24 hours. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were initiated due to the initial diagnosis of secondary bacterial infection, sepsis, and high bacterial count with elevated procalcitonin levels in the presence of shock. Initial antibiotic regimen included intravenous meropenem 1 gm stat after a proper skin test, followed by intravenous meropenem 500 mg every eight hours, and intravenous doxycycline 100 mg twice daily after a proper skin test. However, the antibiotics were de-escalated within 48 hours as cultures turned up sterile. Sodium bicarbonate tablets, 500 mg every eight hours, were administered due to a pH of 7.24 and bicarbonate level of 12 mEq/L (22-29 mEq/L) in the presence of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI). Free Thyroxine (FT4), Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), and cortisol levels were normal. Catheterisation was performed, and the patient was on oral feed with potassium chloride supplementation.

Fever profile reports revealed positive IgM Dengue antibodies by IgM antibody capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (MAC-ELISA) with a titre of 12.08 (>11 positive), as well as positive IgG Dengue antibodies by GAC ELISA with a titre of 17.05 (>11 positive). These findings suggested a diagnosis of severe dengue infection according to World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria, with a possibility of past infection with the dengue virus. Other reports were unremarkable, and urine analysis revealed haematuria with 30 RBCs per high-power field and 2+ proteinuria without any casts or microorganisms.

Inotrope and Frusemide infusions were titrated by monitoring vital parameters and IVC collapsibility. Blood and urine cultures yielded negative results, but D-Dimer levels were elevated at 500 ng/mL (Normal <400 ng/mL), while NT-proBNP levels were significantly high at 7322 pg/mL (Normal up to 125 pg/mL). Ultrasound Whole Abdomen (USG WA) revealed gallbladder sludge with a thickened and oedematous gallbladder wall, along with mild ascites and bilateral pleural effusion. The urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio was elevated at 1200 mg/gm (Normal <30 mg/gm) of creatinine, while antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody profile and antinuclear antibody Hep 2 tests yielded negative results. C3 and C4 levels were within the normal range.

The nephrologist recommended haemodialysis, which was initiated on the day of admission via central cannulation and performed on three successive days. There was gradual improvement in urea and creatinine levels, and urine output increased from anuria to 500 mL/day on the second day of haemodialysis. Gradually, facial puffiness and pedal oedema decreased, and noradrenaline was discontinued after two days. Lasix infusion was stopped after three days when urine output exceeded 2500 mL/24 hours and urea levels reached 45 mg/dL and creatinine levels dropped to 2.3 mg/dL. A repeat echocardiography performed four days after the initial one revealed normal wall motion with an EF of 60% and no wall motion abnormalities. The patient responded well to treatment, and urea and creatinine levels returned to normal 10 days after admission. However, the urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio remained elevated at 800 mg/gm of creatinine. A normal chest X-ray confirmed recovery from congestive cardiac failure (Table/Fig 3).

The patient was discharged 14 days after admission with instructions for follow-up in the Medicine, Cardiology, and Nephrology Outpatient Department (OPD). During the two-week follow-up visit, the patient was doing well, with normal results for complete blood count, urea, creatinine, sodium, and potassium. However, the urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio remained elevated at 475 mg/gm of creatinine, indicating the need for long-term follow-up.

Discussion

Dengue fever is known to cause multisystem involvement and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. A recent large review study reported a median mortality rate of 5.13% (range 0.5-38.6) in severe dengue (1). In this case, the patient experienced reversible cardiomyopathy and nephropathy with a positive response to treatment.

According to the WHO classification from 2009, dengue fever is categorised into dengue (with or without warning signs) and severe dengue, which involves multiorgan involvement affecting the Central Nervous System (CNS), heart, liver, and other organs. Dengue can affect the cardiovascular system and lead to conditions such as myocarditis, pericardial effusions, cardiomyopathy, Atrioventricular (AV) block, atrial fibrillation, and ectopic ventricular beats (2). The prevalence of myocarditis in hospitalised dengue patients is reported to be 11.28%. Moreover, the risk of myocarditis is higher in patients with non severe dengue with warning signs or severe dengue (46.6%) compared to non severe dengue patients (9.72%) (2). The dengue virus directly invades cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, and myocardial interstitial cells, leading to increased proinflammatory markers and abnormalities in calcium homeostasis (3). While myocarditis is typically reversible, delayed diagnosis can sometimes result in fatalities (3). Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can be used to diagnose myocarditis by identifying myocardial oedema and late contrast enhancement. Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM) affects the heart muscles, causing weakening and contractile dysfunction that is not associated with ischaemic heart disease, valvular heart disease, or hypertension. Key diagnostic criteria for DCM include left ventricular systolic dysfunction (EF <55%), dilatation with normal left ventricular wall thickness (4). DCM is the most common reason for cardiac transplantation and the third most common cause of congestive heart failure (5). Exertional breathlessness and exercise intolerance are common modes of presentation, but asymptomatic patients may also be incidentally found to have cardiomegaly (6). Infections, toxins, metabolic derangements, and inflammation are common causes of DCM, although many cases remain idiopathic. Viral infections, particularly adenovirus, are the most common cause of viral myocarditis in adults. Although initially thought to be rare, myocarditis is actually the most common cardiac manifestation of dengue, leading to cardiomyopathy (7). A cohort study conducted in Sri Lanka showed increased myocardial involvement in dengue patients without long-term complications (7). Unusual dengue cases reported from Sri Lanka have highlighted cases of myocarditis, such as in a successfully treated 17-year-old female who received steroids and careful fluid therapy (8). Another similar study focused on dengue patients with sinus node involvement and those with volume overload, where fluid therapy posed challenges (9).

Primary dengue infection provides lifelong immunity against the specific serotype involved, but infection with a different serotype can lead to severe and potentially life-threatening conditions such as Dengue Haemorrhagic Syndrome (DHS) and Dengue Shock Syndrome (DSS). Severe secondary infections are caused by antibody-dependent enhancement (10).

Dengue fever can also affect the renal system, leading to glomerulonephritis, proteinuria, and severe Acute Kidney Injury (AKI). The incidence of AKI in dengue ranges from 0.83-14.40%, with a mortality rate of 11.30-60% (11),(12),(13). The mechanisms of Dengue-Associated Kidney Injury (DAKI) are described in (Table/Fig 4) (12),(13),(14),(15).

In this patient, the second mechanism mentioned in the table above appears to be the most likely cause of acute renal failure, which may also explain the elevated inflammatory markers (ESR and CRP) and total counts mentioned in the report.

According to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines, AKI is defined as a rise in serum creatinine of >0.3 mg/dL, a rise in serum creatinine of more than 1.5 times the baseline, or a decrease in urine volume to <0.5 mL/kg/hour for six hours (16). A systematic review conducted by MallhiTH et al., showed that the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria were more sensitive, as they diagnosed a higher incidence of dengue-induced AKI (3.3% to 13%) (17). Another review of 5 studies by Mallhi TH et al., demonstrated that the AKIN criteria had higher sensitivity, defining AKI as a 1.5 times increase in serum creatinine within seven days from baseline (compared to serum creatinine >2 mg/dL) or a rise in serum creatinine >26.2 micromoles/liter from baseline within 48 hours. Basu G et al., and Kuo MC et al., reported a very high incidence of DAKI using the RIFLE criteria (Risk of renal dysfunction, Injury to kidney, Failure or Loss of kidney function, and End-stage kidney disease) (41.1% and 27.1%, respectively), but this was due to a smaller number of dengue patients (n=28) and the application of RIFLE (risk, injury, and failure) criteria in only half of the patients (13),(14). There are no guidelines regarding when to initiate haemodialysis in DAKI, nor the dosage or modality of Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT) for treating DAKI. DAKI can progress to Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), and a gradual reduction in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) with increased proteinuria is characteristic. AKI patients requiring dialysis have a worse outcome with a higher risk of progression to CKD (18). Extended longitudinal follow-up is necessary for DAKI patients to monitor the GFR rise (19). Hypotension and shock are associated with a higher incidence of DAKI (20). A haematocrit level >46.5 is associated with a 4.7-fold higher incidence of DAKI (21). Severe dengue with concurrent DAKI has a mortality rate of 64% (10). The patient in this case report presented with severe dengue with cardiomyopathy and nephropathy, which responded to treatment with normalisation of echocardiography, urea, and creatinine. However, proteinuria persisted in the range of macroalbuminuria even after recovery, indicating the need for regular follow-up as the patient experienced hypotension and required haemodialysis, both of which are independently associated with an increased risk of progression to CKD.

Conclusion

Severe dengue with multisystem involvement carries a high-risk of morbidity and mortality. Cardiomyopathy and AKI are well known reversible complications that require prompt diagnosis and treatment to prevent complications and mortality. Although guidelines regarding dialysis are not specific, dialysis should be utilised in the treatment of DAKI to prevent complications. Additionally, patients with DAKI who present with hypotension, haemoconcentration, or require dialysis should be closely monitored for an extended period to track GFR, proteinuria, and the progression to CKD.

References

1.
Chagas GCL, Rangel AR, Noronha LM. Risk factors for mortality in patients with dengue: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop Med Int Health. 2022;27(8):656-68. Doi: 10.1111/tmi.13797. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Gulati S, Maheshwari A. Atypical manifestations of dengue. Trop Med Int Health. 2007;12(9):1087-95. Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01891.x. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Li Y, Hu Z, Huang Y, Li J, Hong W, Qin Z, et al. Characterization of the myocarditis during the worst outbreak of dengue infection in China. Medicine. 2016;95(27):e4051. Doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004051. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Thomas M, Christopher B. “Heart disease,” in Current Medical Diagnosis and Treatment, McGraw-Hill Medical, 2013, Pp. 411.
5.
Merlo M, Stolfo D, Caiffa T. Clinical presentation, spectrum of disease, and natural history. 2019 May 18. In: Sinagra G, Merlo M, Pinamonti B, editors. Dilated Cardiomyopathy: From Genetics to Clinical Management [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2019. Chapter 6. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK553846/ doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-13864-6_6. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Weigner M, Morgan J. The causes of dilated cardiomyopathy. Up To Date. v2007;15(3):01-10.
7.
Satarasinghe RL, Arultnithy K, Amerasena NL, Bulugahapitiya U, Sahayam DV. Asymptomatic myocardial involvement in acute dengue virus infection in a cohort of adult Sri Lankans admitted to a tertiary referral centre. Br J Cardiol. 2007;14(3):171-73.
8.
Kularatne SAM, Ralapanawa U, Dalugama C, Jayasinghe J, Rupasinghe S, Kumarihamy P. Series of 10 dengue fever cases with unusual presentations and complications in Sri Lanka: A single centre experience in 2016. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):674. Published 2018 Dec 18. Doi:10.1186/s12879-018-3596-5. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Jayaweera DK, Subasinghe S, De Silva RF, Sanjeewa WAHP, Jayawickreme KP. Complicated dengue fever and its treatment dilemmas: A single-center experience in Sri Lanka. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2021;2021:8854282. Published 2021 Jan 13. Doi:10.1155/2021/8854282. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Rodenhuis-Zybert IA, Wilschut J, Smit JM. Dengue virus life cycle: Viral and host factors modulating infectivity. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010;67(16):2773-86. Doi: 10.1007/s00018-010-0357-z. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Repizo LP, Malheiros DM, Yu L, Barros RT, Burdmann EA. Biopsy proven acute tubular necrosis due to rhabdomyolysis in a dengue fever patient: A case report and review of literature. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2014;56(1):85-88. Doi: 10.1590/S0036-46652014000100014.[crossref][PubMed]
12.
Lee IK, Liu JW, Yang KD. Clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes in adults experiencing dengue hemorrhagic fever complicated with acute renal failure. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80(4):651-55. https://www.ajtmh.org/view/ journals/tpmd/80/4/article-p651.xml. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Basu G, Chrispal A, Boorugu H, Gopinath KG, Chandy S, Prakash JAJ. et al. Acute kidney injury in tropical acute febrile illness in a tertiary care centre-RIFLE criteria validation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;26(2):524-31. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Kuo MC, Lu PL, Chang JM, Lin MY, Tsai JJ, Chen YH, et al. Impact of renal failure on the outcome of dengue viral infection. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3(5):1350- 56. Doi:10.2215/CJN.00020108. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Karakus A, Banga N, Voorn GP, Meinders AJ. Dengue shock syndrome and rhabdomyolysis. Neth J Med. 2007;65(2):78-81. https://www.njmonline.nl/getpdf. php?id=502.
16.
Ostermann M, Bellomo R, Burdmann EA, Doi K, Endre ZH, Goldstein SL, et al. Controversies in acute kidney injury: Conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Conference. Kidney Int. 2020;98(2):294- 309. Doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.04.020. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Mallhi TH, Sarriff A, Adnan AS, Khan YH, Hamzah AA, Jummaat F, et al. Dengue- induced Acute Kidney Injury (DAKI): A neglected and fatal complication of dengue viral infection-A systematicreview. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015;25(11):828- 34. https://applications.emro.who.int/imemrf/J_Coll_Physicians_Surg_Pak/J_Coll_ Physicians_Surg_Pak_2015_25_11_828_834.pdf.
18.
Ali A, Sutton E. A case of dengue hemorrhagic fever and the use of supportive therapy. The Medicine Forum. 2015;15(9):20-23. https://jdc.jefferson.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1317&context=tmf. [crossref]
19.
Mallhi TH, Khan AH, Adnan AS, Sarriff A, Khan YH, Gan SH. Short-term renal outcomes following acute kidney injury among dengue patients: A follow-up analysis from large prospective cohort. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0192510. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192510. PMID: 29481564; PMCID: PMC5826532. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Naqvi R. Dengue infection causing acute kidney injury. Trop Med Surg. 2016;4:211. Doi: 10.4172/2329-9088.1000211. [crossref]
21.
Haikal WZ, Fadhlina NZ, Lim CTS, Goh BK. Evaluating factors associated with Aki in 2-month dengue admission in Serdang hospital. Kidney Int Rep. 2017;2(4):s25.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63898.18449

Date of Submission: Mar 05, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jun 17, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jul 31, 2023
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2023

Author declaration:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 06, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jun 22, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jul 20, 2023 (10%)

Etymology: Author Origin

Emendations: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com