Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 102636

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : September | Volume : 17 | Issue : 9 | Page : HC01 - HC05 Full Version

Role of Pulp Volume Method in Assessment of Age and Gender: An Observational Study from Lucknow, India


Published: September 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/58788.18496
Sanad Khandelwal, Anurag Tripathi, Vikram Khanna, Ranjitkumar Patil, Vandana Singh

1. Senior Resident, Department of Dentistry, Government Medical College, Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Professor, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. 3. Additional Professor, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. 4. Professor and Head, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. 5. Additional Professor, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Anurag Tripathi,
Professor, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, King George’s Medical University, Chowk, Lucknow-226010, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: dranuragtripathi@yahoo.co.in

Abstract

Introduction: In forensics, age and gender determination are required for victim identification. Secondary dentine deposition occurs throughout life, resulting in decreased pulp volume and size. Evaluation of pulp volume using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is a non invasive method used to evaluate age and gender.

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of the pulp volume method in determining age and gender.

Materials and Methods: An observational study was conducted in the Oral Medicine and Radiology Department of King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India from July 2019 to August 2020. Pulp volume measurements were obtained from CBCT data of randomly selected individuals (n=90) aged 18-70 years, focusing on maxillary Central Incisors (CI) and maxillary Canine (C). Statistical analyses, including Chi-square test, Pearson’s correlation, linear regression, and logistic regression, were performed on the data.

Results: The CBCT data from 90 individuals, aged 18-70 years, were evaluated for pulp volume of maxillary CI and C. The Pearson correlation coefficient indicated a decrease in pulp volume with age. The validation of the equations for sex determination revealed higher prediction accuracy for CI (56.70%) compared to C (53.30%).

Conclusion: Pulp volume obtained from CBCT can serve as a reliable indicator for age estimation and gender prediction.

Keywords

Cone beam computed tomography, Dental age, Dentine deposition, Forensic

The term “forensic” originates from the Latin word “forensis,” meaning “before the forum.” Forensic science has a long history, with trials and debates for identifying convicts taking place in public squares in ancient Rome. This extensive field involves the use of various body parts for victim identification in cases of disasters and murders, serving not only the settlement of medicolegal issues but also humanitarian purposes (1).

Age and gender estimation in forensic science refers to the expertise of accurately determining the chronological age and gender of an unknown person involved in legal or judicial proceedings. In medical forensics, age and sex determination primarily rely on long bones and the skull. Sex determination using the complete skeleton has an accuracy of 98%, 90% with the skull, and 95% if pelvic bones are available. When only long bones such as the femur and humerus are present, the accuracy of sex determination by an expert is approximately 80% (2). Consequently, the accuracy increases with the number of bones available for examination. However, most body parts tend to deteriorate over time or can be destroyed in mishaps (2).

Teeth, on the other hand, are less affected by external factors due to the presence of enamel and its chemical constituents. The use of teeth in forensics is justified by the fact that they also undergo stages of development and maturation, like long bones. Moreover, dental development is not significantly impacted by diseases, drugs, or other factors, unlike bones. These characteristics make teeth highly valuable in forensic as well as in anthropological investigations (3),(4).

Age estimation and sex determination in forensic odontology rely on morphological, histological, biochemical, and radiological assessments of teeth. Most odontological assessments use developmental methods for age determination, which pose challenges in adults when tooth development is completed. Therefore, it is essential to devise new methods to assess age even after tooth development is complete (5).

Estimating dental pulp volume can serve as a post-tooth development age estimation method. After a tooth erupts in the oral cavity, secondary dentin deposition begins. This process continues throughout the tooth’s lifespan, leading to the narrowing of the pulp chamber and a reduction in pulp size and volume (5).

Assessing the secondary dentin deposited in teeth can be done through tooth sectioning or radiological methods. Tooth sectioning methods, like aspartic acid racemisation, are invasive, complicated, and time-consuming, making them less commonly used. Conversely, radiological methods are simpler, more convenient, and ethically sound, as radiographs can be obtained without tooth extraction in living individuals or cadavers. These methods measure the decrease in pulp volume over time using various third-party software (3),(4),(6).

In the determination of pulp volume, non invasive 3D modalities such as Computed Tomography (CT) and CBCT are preferred over 2D radiological techniques. 3D scans provide comprehensive information in all three planes unlike a 2D scans (7). CBCT offers advantages over CT by exposing the patient to lesser radiation. With its isotropic voxels and ability to differentiate objects of different attenuation separated by small distances, CBCT is an appealing imaging method (7).

Although studies have been conducted by Tardivo D et al., and Andrade VM et al., to estimate age and gender based on the pulp volume method (8),(9), no similar study had been conducted in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. Therefore, the present study was planned to assess both criterias, similar to the study by Andrade VM et al., and provide age and gender estimation formulas with determination coefficients specific to the North Indian population (9). The present study aimed to estimate age and determine sex in adults using the dental pulp volume method with the assistance of CBCT.

Material and Methods

An observational study was conducted at the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India from July 2019 to August 2020. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee (ethical reference no. 103rdECM II B-Thesis/P27). Verbal consent was obtained from individuals whose CBCT data was utilised for the study, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria mentioned below.

Inclusion criteria: CBCT scans of individuals aged between 18 and 70 years with at least one fully erupted CI and one C on either side of the quadrant, with completed root formation, were included. These teeth were considered due to their smaller internal anatomical variation (8).

Exclusion criteria: CBCT scans of dentition with decay, ongoing endodontic treatment, restorations, orthodontic or prosthetic devices, severe attrition reaching up to the incisal/occlusal third of the teeth, fractured tooth, pulp calcifications, impaction, gross malocclusion, and periodontal pathologies were excluded.

Sample size calculation: The sample size was calculated based on the minimum correlation between pulp volume and age in the study population, similar to the study done by Andrade VM et al., using the formula (9):.

r=0.872 (minimum correlation between pulp volume and age)
c=9, (overall combinations of gender and tooth type)
Type-I error α=5% (corresponding to 95% confidence level)
Type-II error β=10% (detecting results with 90% power of the study)
Based on these parameters, the required sample size was determined to be 90.

Procedure

Data collection: The study enrolled only one group with CBCT data from 90 individuals. CBCT scans of the CI and C were randomly selected, following the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the study.
Pulp volume analysis:

1. The scans were transferred from the Carestream CS 9300® CBCT machine console in the form of a DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) files to a system with third-party software called “Dolphin” for assessment and measurement of the pulp volume of the desired tooth.
2. The tooth of interest was snipped from the arch, creating a Region of Interest (ROI), using the cutting tool in the software for pulp volume measurement.
3. The outer portion of the selected tooth was roughly cut using the tool to expose the coronal and radicular pulp.
4. The remaining layer of dentin surrounding the pulp was snipped to fully expose the pulp.
5. The pulp obtained was measured using the software. The age and sex of the subjects were known prior to the study, so the obtained pulp volumes were analysed statistically to find correlations between pulp volume and age and sex.

Statistical Analysis

The results were analysed using descriptive statistics and comparisons were made among various groups. Categorical data were summarised as proportions and percentages (%), while quantitative data were summarised as mean±Standard Deviation (SD). Statistical analyses included the Chi-square test, Pearson’s correlation, linear regression analysis, and logistic regression analysis. The data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 23.0) software and Microsoft excel.

Results

In the present study, the majority of cases were aged between 20-29 years (44.4%), followed by the age range 30-39 years (30%). There were more males (n=47) included in the study compared to females (n=43) (Table/Fig 1).

In the present study, the majority of cases were aged between 20- 29 years (44.4%), followed by the age range 30-39 years (30%). There were more males (n=47) included in the study compared to females (n=43) (Table/Fig 1).

The data in (Table/Fig 3) is divided into five age categories: ≤19 years, 20-29 years, 30-39 years, 40-49 years, and ≥50 years. Each age category provides information on the number of participants (N), the mean, Standard Deviation (SD), minimum (Min.), and maximum (Max.) values for the CI volume, C volume, and average pulp volume. The overall data for all age groups combined (Total) consisted of 90 participants. The mean values for CI pulp volume, C volume, and average pulp volume were 20.78 mm3, 43.13 mm3, and 31.96 mm3, respectively, with standard deviations of 9.47, 20.39, and 14.14, respectively.

The regression equation to predict age by CI volume among males is given by: Age=48.824-0.747 (CI). The Pearson’s correlation coefficient between age and CI volume among males was calculated to be -0.409 (r-value=-0.409), indicating a negative correlation. This suggests that the volume of the CI decreases with age. The p-value was <0.05 (0.004), which was statistically significant, that suggests that the regression equation was valid (Table/Fig 4). The scatterplot suggested that only about 17% of the total cases follow the line of best fit (Table/Fig 5). The regression equation to predict age by C volume among males was given by: Age=46.798-0.297 (C). The Pearson correlation coefficient between age and C volume among males was -0.248, which is less negative than the correlation with CI volume. This indicates a lesser decrease in pulp volume of the maxillary canine with age.

The p-value is <0.05 (0.008), which was statistically significant, confirming the validity of the equation. The determination coefficient for age estimation in males for the maxillary canine is R2=0.062, 3which was significantly less. The scatterplot suggests that less than 1% of the total cases follow the line of best fit (Table/Fig 6).

The regression equation to predict age by CI volume among females was given by: Age=35.351-0.179 (CI). The Pearson correlation coefficient between age and CI volume among females was found to be -0.162, indicating a weak negative correlation. This suggests that there is very little decrease in CI volume with age in females. The p-value (0.299) was significantly higher than 0.05, indicating that the linear regression equation was not valid in the present case and age estimation cannot be accurately done based on CI pulp volume in females. The determination coefficient (R2) was 0.026.

The regression equation to predict age by C volume among females was given by: Age=36.462-0.113 (C). The Pearson correlation coefficient between age and C volume among females was -0.209, indicating a weak negative correlation. This suggests that there is a lesser decrease in pulp volume of the maxillary canine with age in females. The p-value (0.179) was higher than 0.05, indicating that the above equation was not significant for age estimation in females using C pulp volume. The determination coefficient (R2) was 0.044 (Table/Fig 7).

The regression equation to predict age by average volume among males was given by: Age=49.749-0.505 (average volume). The Pearson correlation coefficient between age and average tooth volume of CI and C among males was found to be -0.425, indicating a moderately negative correlation. The p-value (0.003) was less than 0.05, indicating statistical significance and validating the equation. The determination coefficient (R2) was 0.181.

The linear regression equation to predict age by average volume among females was given by: Age=36.342-0.148 (average). The Pearson correlation coefficient between age and average tooth volume among females was found to be -0.198, indicating a weak negative correlation. This suggests that the decrease in average pulp volume of CI and C with age was less in females. The p-value (0.203) was significantly higher than 0.05, indicating that the above equation was not significant for age estimation in females using pulp volume of CI and C. The determination coefficient was 0.039 (Table/Fig 8).

The regression equation to predict age by CI volume when gender was not known was given by: Age=42.569-0.458 (CI). The Pearson correlation coefficient between age and CI tooth volume among females was found to be -0.314, indicating an intermediate negative correlation. The p-value is less than 0.05 (0.003), indicating statistical significance and validating the equation. The determination coefficient is 0.099.

The regression equation to predict age by C volume when gender is not known is given by: Age=42.462-0.218 (C). The Pearson correlation coefficient between age and C tooth volume among females was found to be -0.322, indicating an intermediate negative correlation. The p-value was less than 0.05 (0.003), indicating statistical significance and validating the equation. The determination coefficient is 0.104.

The regression equation to predict age by average tooth pulp volume of CI and C when gender is not known is given by:

Age=43.586 -0.330 (average volume)

The Pearson correlation coefficient between age and average pulp volume of CI and C among subjects with unknown gender was found to be -0.334, indicating an intermediate negative correlation. The p-value was highly statistically significant (p=0.001), validating the equation. The determination coefficient was 0.114 (Table/Fig 9).

The logistic regression equation to predict gender by CI volume when age is not known is given by: M=1.040-0.046 (CI). Male would be predicted if M>0, else female would be predicted. The prediction accuracy of the equation is 56.70%.

The logistic regression equation to predict gender by C volume when age is not known was given by: M=0.618 - 0.012 (C). Male would be predicted if M>0, else female would be predicted. The prediction accuracy of the equation is 53.30%.

The logistic regression equation to predict gender by average volume when age is not known is given by: M=0.825-0.023 (average volume). Male would be predicted if M>0, else female would be predicted. The prediction accuracy of the equation was 51.10% (Table/Fig 10).

Discussion

In the present study, the authors measured the pulp volumes of the maxillary CI and C in the right maxillary quadrant for age estimation and sex determination. The sample size included 90 subjects, ranging in age from 18 to 70 years, with a total of 43 females and 47 males. The authors compared the study with previous research, as shown in (Table/Fig 11) (9),(10),(11),(12),(13),(14),(15).

Andrade VM et al., conducted a study including upper CI and C, which found a strong correlation between chronological age and pulp volume of the selected teeth. They reported Pearson correlation coefficients of -0.8782 for CI and -0.8738 for C, whereas the present study showed significant but lower coefficients for maxillary CI (r=-0.409) in males and maxillary C (r=-0.209) in females (9).

Biuki N et al., conducted a study on the relationship between pulp-tooth volume of upper and lower anterior teeth and chronological age. They found an inverse relationship, indicating a decrease in pulp volume with increasing chronological age, which aligns with the findings (10). Asif MK et al., also determined the relationship between pulp-tooth volume and chronological age, using the pulp chamber/crown ratio, and found a strong correlation (11).

Gulsahi A et al., conducted a study that showed a negative correlation between pulp volume and chronological age, similar to the present study (12). Santos MA et al., aimed to formulate regression equations for age estimation in maxillary CI teeth and concluded that pulp measurements are more accurate, supporting the present findings (13). Kazmi S et al., had similar findings to the present study, indicating that mandibular canines with known sex of the subjects had the best age prediction ability (14).

However, Abdinian M et al., concluded in their study that CI had higher age predictive ability in females than canines, unlike the present findings where canines had better age predictive ability (15).

Limitation(s)

One limitation of the present study is the limited sample size, focusing only on CI and C, with known ages of the subjects.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the present study found a statistically significant correlation between age/sex and pulp volumes of the selected teeth, indicating a decrease in pulp volume with increasing age. Gender prediction was moderately accurate. The authors recommend conducting future studies with a larger sample size, including more teeth for pulp volume measurements, and blinding the age of the individuals for more accurate and valid results.

References

1.
Narajo N, Avais MA. Examining the role of forensic science for the investigative- solution of crimes. Sindh University Research Journal. 2012;44(2):251-54.
2.
Srivastava RK, Kumar A, Ali I, Wadhwani P, Awasthi P. Determination of age and sex and identification of deceased person by forensic procedures. Universal Research Journal of Dentistry. 2014;4(3):153-57. [crossref]
3.
Krishan K, Kanchan T, Garg AK. Dental evidence in forensic identification- An overview, methodology and present status. Open Dent J. 2015;9:250-56. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Shah P, Velani PR, Lakade L, Dukle S. Teeth in forensics: A review. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2019;30(2):291-99. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Verma M, Verma N, Sharma R, Sharma A. Dental age estimation methods in adult dentitions: An overview. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2019;11(2):57-63. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Panchbhai AS. Dental radiographic indicators, a key to age estimation. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40(4):199-212. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Merdietio Boedi R, Shepherd S, Mânica S, Franco A. CBCT in dental age estimation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology. 2022;51(4):20210335. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Tardivo D, Sastre J, Ruquet M, Thollon L, Adalian P, Leonetti G, et al. Three- dimensional modeling of the various volumes of canines to determine age and sex: A preliminary study. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(3):766-70. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Andrade VM, Fontenele RC, de Souza AC, Almeida CA, Vieira AC, Groppo FC, et al. Age and sex estimation based on pulp cavity volume using cone beam computed tomography: Development and validation of formulas in a Brazilian sample. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology. 2019;48(7):20190053. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Biuki N, Razi T, Faramarzi M. Relationship between pulp-tooth volume ratios and chronological age in different anterior teeth on CBCT. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2017;9(5):e688-93. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Asif MK, Nambiar P, Mani SA, Ibrahim NB, Khan IM, Sukumaran P. Dental age estimation employing CBCT scans enhanced with Mimics software: Comparison of two different approaches using pulp/tooth volumetric analysis. J Forensic Leg Med. 2018;54:53-61. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Gulsahi A, Kulah CK, Bakirarar B, Gulen O, Kamburoglu K. Age estimation based on pulp/tooth volume ratio measured on Cone Beam CT images. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2018;47(1):20170239. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Santos MA, Muinelo-Lorenzo J, Fernández-Alonso A, Cruz-Landeira A, Aroso C, Suárez-Cunqueiro MM. Age Estimation using maxillary central incisor analysis on cone beam computed tomography human images. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(20):13370. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Kazmi S, Mânica S, Revie G, Shepherd S, Hector M. Age estimation using canine pulp volumes in adults: A CBCT image analysis. International Journal of Legal Medicine. 2019;133(6):1967-76. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Abdinian M, Katiraei M, Zahedi H, Rengo C, Soltani P, Spagnuolo G. Age estimation based on pulp-tooth volume ratio of anterior teeth in cone-beam computed tomographic images in a selected population: A cross-sectional study. Appl Sci. 2021:11;9984.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/58788.18496

Date of Submission: Jun 30, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Sep 16, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Aug 28, 2023
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 01, 2022
• Manual Googling: Sep 28, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 26, 2023 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com