Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 103620

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : VC01 - VC05 Full Version

Risk Factors Associated with Female Suicide Attempts: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60857.18190
G Sundaravalli, M Priyasubhashini, R Priyadharshini

1. Junior Resident, Department of Psychiatry, Stanley Medical College Hospital, Old Jail Road, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Stanley Medical College Hospital, Old Jail Road, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Stanley Medical College Hospital, Old Jail Road, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
G Sundaravalli,
Junior Resident, Department of Psychiatry, Stanley Medical College Hospital, Old Jail Road, Chennai-600001, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: sundaravalli96@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Attempted suicide, both fatal and non fatal, is a challenging public health issue. In India, suicide attempts are more frequent in females than in males. Gender-related vulnerability to psychopathology and psychosocial stressors pose women with increased vulnerability to suicidal behaviour. Studies suggest that each prior attempt among women increased risk of future suicide threefold. More is known about differences in males and females in conditions like depression and schizophrenia than suicide. Remarkably few studies have focused upon suicidal behaviour in women or attempted to explore the complex relationships between various risk factors and suicidal behaviour in women. Such studies can provide useful information for understanding the risk factors associated with female suicide attempts and can help in developing suicide prevention strategies catering to the needs of women.

Aim: To study the risk factors associated with female suicide attempts in patients admitted in a medical college hospital in South India.

Materials and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Psychiatry, Stanley Medical College Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, from October 2021 to March 2022. Based on convenience sampling method, 170 female patients admitted for attempted suicide above 18 years of age who were referred for psychiatric counselling services to the Outpatient unit were considered for the study. Data on socio-demographic details including age, education status, marital and employment status, type of family and socio-economic status was collected. In addition, data on clinical variables like suicide and mental illness in the family, mode of attempt, number of past suicide attempts, co-morbid physical illness were collected from the participants. Beck’s suicide intent scale was used to assess the severity of suicide intent. Presumptive Stressful Life Events Scale (PSLES) was used to assess the stressful life events. For analysing the factors associated with severity of suicide intent, inferential statistics (Pearson’s Chi-square test) was used.

Results: Of the 170 women who attempted suicide, 79 (46.5%) were between age group 18 and 25 years. A total of 71 (41.8%) participants were employed and 111 (65.3%) were married. A total of 48 (28.2%) participants had co-morbid physical illness. Suicide ideation in the past 30 days were reported by 43 participants. The most common method of suicide attempt was self-poisoning (91.8%). A total of 65 participants (38.2%) had a current diagnosis of depression, 25 (14.7%) participants had one or two suicide attempts in the past, 99 (58.2%) women who attempted suicide had medium suicidal intent and in 30 participants (17.7%) the severity of suicide was high. The most common stressful life event was marital conflict. The severity of suicide intent was associated with age, past history of suicide attempt, suicide ideation in the past 30 days and current psychiatric diagnosis. Suicide intent was high in older age group patients and in those who had suicide ideation in the previous 30 days. Among the psychiatric diagnosis patients with diagnosis of depressive disorder had higher suicide intent. The mean±Standard Deviation (SD) stressful life event score was 115.93±36.50 in patients with high suicide intent.

Conclusion: The study highlights the various risk factors associated with female suicide attempts. The association between suicide intent and underlying psychiatric disorder in female suicide attempted patients insist the need for prompt diagnosis and management of psychiatric illness in preventing suicide behaviours in women. Suicide prevention programs should incorporate women-specific strategies. Multisectoral collaboration is needed to empower women with a good family, social support and foster socio-emotional life skills in women.

Keywords

Attempted suicide, Beck’s suicide intent scale, Psychiatric counselling

Attempted suicide, both fatal and non fatal, is a challenging public health issue (1). According to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), suicide attempt is defined as a self-initiated sequence of behaviours by an individual who, at the time of initiation, expected that the set of actions would lead to his or her own death (2). The rate of suicide attempts is estimated to be 20 times higher than that of suicides (3). Despite growing attention and efforts at preventive intervention suicide continues to rise in number and rate. As per National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) reports, a total of 1,64,033 suicides were reported in India and the rate of suicide was 12.0 per one lakh population during the year 2021. Majority of suicides were reported in Maharashtra, India followed by Tamil Nadu, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal and Karnataka. These five states together accounted for 50.4% of the total suicides reported in the country (4).

Suicidal behaviour occurs in response to interactions between biological, psychological, and socio-environmental risk factors (5). A number of studies from Indian background have reported existence of psychiatric disorder in suicide attempters. Evidence also supports an excess of life events, especially in the month before the suicide attempt. Many patients consider that their problems are insolvable, they often cannot think of any other way out of their situation at the time and self-harm becomes an immediate response (6).

In India, suicide attempts are more frequent in females than in males (7). The reasons are multiple either single or combination. Family problems and illness, divorce, dowry, love affairs, cancellation or the inability to get married (according to the system of arranged marriages in India), extramarital affairs, and such conflicts relating to the issue of marriage, play a crucial role in suicidal behaviours, particularly in women (6). Gender-related vulnerability to psychopathology and psychosocial stressors pose women with increased vulnerability to suicidal behaviour (8). Studies suggest higher stability of suicidal behaviour in females than in males. This would be confirmed by data showing higher rates of previous suicide attempts in females presenting with a recent suicide attempt (7). One prior study finding stated that, each prior attempt among women increased risk of future suicide threefold (9).

More is known about differences in males and females in conditions like depression and schizophrenia than suicide. Remarkably few studies have focused upon suicidal behaviour in women or attempted to explore the complex relationships between various risk factors and suicidal behaviour in women (8). Such studies can provide useful information for understanding the risk factors associated with female suicide attempts and can help in developing suicide prevention strategies catering to the needs of women. The current study was aimed to study the risk factors associated with female suicide attempts in patients admitted in a medical college hospital in South India. The primary objective is to evaluate socio-demographic variables, clinical variables, method of attempt and severity of suicide intent in female patients with attempted suicide. The secondary objective is to study the association between severity of suicide intent and the various risk factors.

Material and Methods

The present study was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Psychiatry, Stanley Medical College Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, from October 2021 to March 2022 among female patients, who attempted suicide and were referred to Psychiatric counselling services. The present study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Boards (Reg. No. 20211029). All participants received written and oral explanations regarding the study and provided written informed consent.

Sample size calculation: Sample size for the current cross-sectional study was calculated using the following formula:

n=Z2pq/d2

Based on the study done by Lövestad S et al., proportion of women who have attempted suicide (p) is calculated to be 72% (10).

q=100-p, i.e., q=28%
relative precision (d) is set at 10%,

On substituting in the above formula and including 10% non response rate, total sample size was calculated to be 170. Based on convenience sampling method, female patients admitted for attempted suicide, who were referred for psychiatric counselling service to the outpatient unit during the study period were considered for the study.

Inclusion criteria: Patients of age 18 years and above, and those who gave consent to participate in the study were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with accidental injuries, those with severe medical illness were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Patients who were admitted for self-harm behaviour or attempted suicide were provided emergency medical or surgical care, as needed in emergency wards. After treatment they were referred to Psychiatric Outpatient unit for counselling services. A total of 170 female patients with attempted suicide, who fulfilled the above inclusion criteria were included in the study. The purpose of the interview was explained to each patient and informed written consent was obtained. The interview was carried out by trained psychiatrist. Data on socio-demographic details including age, education status, marital and employment status, type of family and socio-economic status was collected using a semi-structured questionnaire. In addition, data on suicide and mental illness in the family, mode of attempt, procurement of the poison, if the mode 2of attempt involved poisoning/ intoxication and the number of past suicide attempts, co-morbid physical illness and the nature of physical illness were collected from the participants. Suicide ideation in the past 30 days were assessed by asking the participants, if they had any contemplations, wishes, and preoccupations with death and suicide in the previous 30 days. The patients were interviewed for underlying psychopathology and current psychiatric diagnosis was made based on the International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) classification of mental and behavioural disorders (11).

Beck’s suicide intent scale (12): The severity of suicide intent was assessed using Beck’s suicide intent scale. The scale consists of 20 items, each item is rated on an ordinal scale of 0,1 and 2. The scale consists of two sections: Section 1 contains items dealing with the objective circumstances related to the suicide attempt, items 1 to 9 such as whether others were nearby or could possibly intervene, whether there were acts in preparation for the attempt, and whether there was communication of intent. Section 2 contains items based on the patient’s self-report of their internal concept of intent (items 9 through 15), and includes items that rate the expectation of fatality, seriousness of attempt, and attitude toward dying. It takes 3 to 5 minutes to complete the self-report part of the questionnaire by the patient. The inter-rater reliability of the scale has been reported to be r=0.95. The first 15-items are used to assess the severity by adding their score with total score ranging from 0 to 30. Suicide severity is divided into three categories based on the overall score: low intent (scores of 15-19), medium intent (scores of 20-28), and high intent (scores of 29+).

Presumptive Stressful Life Events Scale (PSLES) (13): This scale was developed by Singh G et al., based on the Holme and Rahe Social Readjustment rating schedule (13). The items were reconstructed for the Indian population to assess the stressful life events. This 51-item (yes/no) self-rated scale takes about five minutes to complete. It includes both positive and negative life events like death of spouse, marital conflict, getting married or engaged and questions related. Each individual item is assigned scores varying from 0 to 100 and then ranked according to the perceived stress of each event. The most stressful event, death of spouse is assigned stress score of 95 and the least stressful event, going on a pleasure trip or pilgrimage is assigned stress score of 20. The participants were asked to tick the appropriate item of life events they faced in the last one year. In the present study, the Presumptive Stressful Life Events Scale (PSLES) was used to assess the number of stressful life events in the past one year period prior to the current suicide attempt. The total score is used as stressful life event score.

To ensure an even distribution of participants by age group, the participants were divided into six groups with a 10-year gap between each group. Depending on their employment status, the participants were divided into two groups, employed and unemployed. The modified Kuppuswamy scale was used to categorise the participants into five groups, upper class, upper middle class, lower middle class, upper lower and lower socio-economic class (14). Based on the modified Kuppuswamy scale, the participants’ levels of education were divided into illiterate/no education, college graduates, diploma holders, intermediate school graduates, high school, middle school and primary school graduates.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was done using International Business Machines Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS) software version 23.0. Descriptive statistics was used to describe the sample socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. For analysing the factors associated with severity of suicide intent, inferential statistics (Pearson’s Chi-square test) was used. The p-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Socio-demographic details: Of the 170 women, who attempted suicide, 79 (46.5%) were between the ages 18 and 25 years and 41 (24.1%) were between the ages of 26 and 35 years. About 41 (24.1%) participants had completed college and 32 (18.8%) had completed high school. A total of 71 (41.8%) participants were employed and 111 (65.3%) were married. Majority of them, 148 (87.1%) participants belonged to a nuclear family. A total of 92 (54.1%) were from urban areas and 91 (53.5%) participants were from the upper lower socio-economic class (Table/Fig 1).

Clinical variables: A total of 48 (28.2%) participants had co-morbid physical illness, of which 23 (47.9%) reported having chronic pain. Only 8 (4.7%) and 22 (12.9%) had a family history of mental illness and suicide, respectively. Suicide ideation in the past 30 days was reported by 43 participants. The most common method of suicide attempt was self-poisoning (91.8%), followed by hanging (7.6%). A total of 65 participants (38.2%) had a current diagnosis of depression and 44 (25.9%) had a diagnosis of adjustment disorder. A total of 25 (14.7%) participants had one or two suicide attempts in the past (Table/Fig 2).

Suicide severity is divided into three categories based on the overall score obtained in the Beck’s suicide intent scale: low intent (scores of 15-19), medium intent (scores of 20-28), and high intent (scores of 29+). A total of 99 women who attempted suicide (58.2%) had medium suicidal intent, whereas 41 (24.1%) had low suicidal intent. In 30 participants, the severity of suicide intent was high (Table/Fig 3). The mean score on PSLES was 80, the maximum score was 202 and the minimum score was 38. The most common stressful life event was marital conflict followed by excessive alcohol or drug use by family member, major personal illness or injury and family conflict.

Among the socio-demographic variables, only age was associated with severity of suicide intent with p-value=0.004 (df=25.50). Other variables like education, employment status, marital status, family type, socio-economic status were not associated with severity of suicide intent (Table/Fig 4).

Among the clinical variables, severity of suicide intent was associated with number of previous suicide attempts (p-value=0.05, df=9.440), suicide ideation in the past 30 days (p-value=0.0005, df=28.39) and current psychiatric diagnosis (p-value=0.0005, df=80.48). Other clinical variables like family history of mental illness, family history of suicide, co-morbid medical illness and method of suicide attempt were not associated with severity of suicide intent. The mean±SD stressful life event score was high (115.93±36.50) in patients with high suicide intent (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

This study analysed the socio-demographic, suicide-related, clinical characteristics and suicide intent of 170 female patients admitted with attempted suicide in a Medical College Hospital in South India. The results regarding the characteristics of individuals who had attempted suicide could serve as a foundation for the development of effective suicide prevention strategies. Nearly half of the study population belonged to the age group of 18-25 years. In comparison to younger age groups, the intensity of suicide intent increased with age. This is similar to the findings of previous studies in which older people’ scores on suicidal intent scales were higher than those observed in younger people (15).

Almost half of the study population was unemployed. This is comparable to past studies in which the majority of suicide attempters were unemployed (16). Unemployed women had to rely on their spouses or other family members for financial support. Unemployment is a proven risk factor for suicide attempts. Similar to previous study findings, majority of 111 (65.3%) female patients were married (16). Marital conflict, excessive alcohol use by the spouse and family conflicts were the most commonly reported stressful life events that put married women at risk of suicide.

Majority of the female patients with attempted suicide came from urban background. There is a transfer of the rural population to the urban community in pursuit of work, and the stress connected with it, as well as access to healthcare facilities, all of which contribute to higher rates of suicide recorded from the urban population. Similar to previous studies, most of the patients belonged to the upper lower socio-economic class (16). In the fast-changing economic scenario, those in the lower socio-economic class are highly stressed, which probably makes them the most vulnerable to suicide attempts (10).

A total of 43 (25.3%) patients had suicidal thoughts in the last 30 days, and there was a significant association between the severity of suicidal intent and suicidal ideation in the past 30 days. This is consistent with the findings of a previous study, which discovered that the likelihood of suicide attempt was highest in patients, who had suicidal ideation in the previous 30 days, and it was significantly higher in women (16).

More than 80% of female patients who attempted suicide had psychiatric problems. A total of 65 (38.2%) patients were diagnosed with depression, whereas 44 (25.9%) patients were diagnosed with adjustment disorder. This is in accordance with the previous study findings in which 82% of the suicide attempters were diagnosed to have psychiatric disorder (6). Patients with depression showed higher suicide intent, which is consistent with studies that report depression as a major risk factor for the severity of intent in attempted suicide (15),(17). Patients with mood disorder were more vulnerable than others considering planned attempts of high potential (16). Majority of the patients reported life events prior to the attempt. Stressful life events like marital conflicts, major illness and family conflict precede the depressive episode or milder emotional disturbances such as the adjustment disorder with anxious or depressive emotions. Many patients consider that their problems are insolvable, they often cannot think of any other way out of their situation at the time and self-harm becomes an immediate response. Personality disorders were diagnosed in 39 (23%) individuals and their intent to attempt suicide was lower than that of patients with other mental disorders. This is similar to the findings of various studies, which report that the mean Suicide Intention Score (SIS) was significantly lower among patients with personality disorders compared with patients with other psychiatric diagnoses (18),(19). Patients with personality disorders experience stress from interpersonal disputes and are more likely to act impulsively, experience depression and anxiety.

Self-poisoning accounted for 91.8% of all suicide attempts in this study. In accordance with this finding, another study report intoxication to be the most common method of suicide (7). The most likely reason is the unrestricted use of insecticides and rodenticides in Indian households for domestic usage. There was no significant association between methods of suicide and severity of suicidal intent. A total of 48 patients had a co-existing physical illness, of which 13.5% had chronic pain. Type and number of physical health conditions have been suggested to be associated with an increased risk of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Studies exploring physical health conditions co-occurring with mental health conditions have similarly suggested an increased likelihood of suicidal thoughts and behaviours, but not above the independent risk of mental ill-health alone (20). Characteristics of most of the associated physical illnesses were chronic, non remitting pain, restriction of occupational and recreational endeavours, physical mobility leading to depression.

Only 4.7% patients had family history of mental illness and family history of suicide was present in only 12.9% of the sample. This is in agreement with previous study findings, which reported 14.9% of the suicide attempters had a family history of suicide attempt (21). Studies have reported on the aetiology of the familial transmission of suicidal behaviour. The effects of family history are mediated through both shared biologic vulnerability and family environmental conditions. A 17.6% had previous history of suicide attempts, of whom 14.7% had one or two previous attempts and 2.9% had three or more suicide attempts. The intent of suicide was significantly high in those patients, who had three or more suicide attempts in the past. A suicide attempt is the best predictor of a future suicide attempt. Identifying repeaters is important as their rate and probability of death by suicide are significantly higher.

The most common presumptive stressful life event was marital conflict followed by excessive alcohol or drug use by family member, major personal illness or injury, family conflict. The mean±SD stressful life event score was 115.93±36.50 in patients with high suicide intent. While patients with low suicide intent had lower stressful life event score (mean±SD score: 51.27±13.53), compared to those with high suicide intent. Literature suggests that recent adverse life events contribute to the increased risk and intent of suicide or suicide attempts. In general, marriage appears to be less protective against suicide for women than for men. The life and marital circumstances of these women may make them vulnerable to suicidal behaviour. Stresses may include arranged and early marriage, young motherhood, low social status, domestic violence, and economic dependence (8).

Limitation(s)

The study being a cross-sectional descriptive study lacks the advantage of comparing female and male suicidal behaviours. Other factors like hopelessness, personality traits, impulsivity associated with suicide attempts could have been studied using validated scales.

Conclusion

The present study highlights the various risk factors associated with female suicide attempts. Poisoning was the most common method of suicide attempt. Thus, restricting the availability of pesticides may be helpful in lowering the rate of suicidal attempts. The association between suicide intent and underlying psychiatric disorder in female suicide attempted patients insist the need for prompt diagnosis and management of psychiatric illness in preventing suicide behaviours in women. Suicide prevention programs should incorporate womenspecific strategies. Multisectoral collaboration is needed to empower women with a good family, social support and foster socio-emotional life skills in women.

References

1.
Bansal P, Gupta A, Kumar R. The psychopathology and the sociodemographic determinants of attempted suicide patients. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2011;5(5):917-920.
2.
Fehling KB, Selby EA. Suicide in DSM-5: Current evidence for the proposed suicide behavior disorder and other possible improvements. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2021;11:499980. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/ article/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.499980. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Freeman A, Mergl R, Kohls E, Székely A, Gusmao R, Arensman E, et al. A cross-national study on gender differences in suicide intent. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):234. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Arya V, Page A, Spittal MJ, Dandona R, Vijayakumar L, Munasinghe S, et al. Suicide in India during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2022;307:215-20. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Bilsen J. Suicide and youth: Risk factors. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:540. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Ramdurg S, Goyal S, Goyal P, Sagar R, Sharan P. Sociodemographic profile, clinical factors, and mode of attempt in suicide attempters in consultation liaison psychiatry in a tertiary care center. Industrial Psychiatry Journal. 2011;20(1):11. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Kupferschmid S, Gysin-Maillart A, Bühler SK, Steffen T, Michel K, Schimmelmann BG, et al. Gender differences in methods of suicide attempts and prevalence of previous suicide attempts. Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2013;41(6):401-05. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Vijayakumar L. Suicide in women. Indian J Psychiatry. 2015;57(Suppl 2):S233-38. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Bommersbach TJ, Rosenheck RA, Petrakis IL, Rhee TG. Why are women more likely to attempt suicide than men? Analysis of lifetime suicide attempts among US adults in a nationally representative sample. J Affect Disord. 2022;311:157- 64. Doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.05.096. Epub 2022 May 19. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Lövestad S, Löve J, Vaez M, Waern M, Hensing G, Krantz G. Suicidal ideation and attempts in population-based samples of women: Temporal changes between 1989 and 2015. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):351. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
World Health Organization(WHO). (1993). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. World Health Organization.
12.
Beck AT, Schuyler D, Herman I. Development of suicidal intent scales. In: The prediction of suicide. Oxford, England: Charles Press Publishers; 1974. p. xii, 249-xii, 249.
13.
Singh G, Kaur D, Kaur H. Presumptive Stressful Life Events Scale (PSLES)- A new stressful life events scale for use in India. Indian J Psychiatry. 1984;26(2):107-14.
14.
Saleem SM, Jan SS. Modified Kuppuswamy socioeconomic scale updated for the year 2021. IJFCM. 2021;8(1):01-03. [crossref]
15.
Woo S, Lee SW, Lee K, Seo WS, Lee J, Kim HC, et al. Characteristics of high- intent suicide attempters admitted to emergency departments. J Korean Med Sci. 2018;33(41):e259. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Kar N. Profile of risk factors associated with suicide attempts: A study from Orissa, India. Indian J Psychiatry. 2010;52(1):48-56. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Brådvik L. Suicide risk and mental disorders. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(9):2028. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Grimholt TK, Jacobsen D, Haavet OR, Ekeberg Ø. Lower suicide intention in patients with personality disorders admitted for deliberate self-poisoning than in patients with other diagnoses. Annals of General Psychiatry. 2017;16(1):21. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Arsenault-Lapierre G, Kim C, Turecki G. Psychiatric diagnoses in 3275 suicides: A meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2004;4(4):37. Doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-4-37. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Onyeka IN, Maguire A, Ross E, O’Reilly D. Does physical ill-health increase the risk of suicide? A census-based follow-up study of over 1 million people. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020;29:e140. Doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000529. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Nakagawa M, Kawanishi C, Yamada T, Iwamoto Y, Sato R, Hasegawa H, et al. Characteristics of suicide attempters with family history of suicide attempt: A retrospective chart review. BMC Psychiatry. 2009;9(1):32.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60857.18190

Date of Submission: Oct 28, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jan 07, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Apr 14, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 31, 2022
• Manual Googling: Mar 17, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Apr 10, 2023 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com