Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 96666

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : SC01 - SC05 Full Version

Clinical Profile of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Children less than 18 years age, in a Tertiary Care Centre, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, India: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/58298.18114
Shantanu Vijay Gomase, PK Biswal

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, JNMC, Sawangi (M), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Joint Director of Health Services, JLNH&RC, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Shantanu Vijay Gomase,
M4-10, Meghdoot Apartment, Paloti Road, Sawangi (M), Wardha-442004, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: drgomase@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) is a very common paediatric endocrine disorder and is increasing each year, particularly in younger children. The T1DM presents as Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) in a significant number of patients. Race, ethnicity, age, and parent education plays an important role in the glycaemic control of the disease. Conflicting data are available about the age of onset, gender predominance, family history, and growth in various international and national studies.

Aim: To study the clinical presentation of T1DM in children aged less than 18 years.

Materials and Methods: The observational cross-sectional study was conducted from April 2011 to March 2013 at Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital and Research Centre, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, India. Total 46 patients with T1DM, aged less than 18 years were included in the study. Socio-demographic data, clinical presentation, age, insulin dose, anthropometry, and laboratory investigations were collected using semi-structured performa. Statistical analysis was done by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0.

Results: Total 46 patients with T1DM attended the hospital with 24 (52.8%) boys and 22 (47.2%) girls. A 28 (60.8%) of patients presented with DKA. 16 (34.8%) of patients were less than five years of age. The youngest patient was of 2.5 years of age. In the present study, stunting was noted in 12 (26.08%) patients. Polyuria (85%) was the most common presenting complaint in newly diagnosed diabetes patients and pain in the abdomen (50%), breathlessness (46.8%) were the most common presenting complaint in established diabetics. Patients with poor control (HbA1c- >8.5%) had significantly higher mean age (12.3±4.01) compared to the group with good control (HbA1c <8.5%) which has mean age (8.5±3.54 years). Availability of medical facilities, higher socio-economic status, and parents’ education was found to be significantly associated with good glycaemic control.

Conclusion: Polyuria was the most common symptom in newly diagnosed diabetics. Higher age was a significant risk factor for poor control of diabetes. DKA may present with respiratory distress in a significant number of patients.

Keywords

Diabetic ketoacidosis, Glycaemic control, Polyuria, Short stature

The T1DM is a common, chronic disease in children and adolescents. Approximately 5,00,000 children, less than 15 years of age are affected by T1DM (1). Already 1,00,000 new children are detected to have T1DM each year. Every fifth T1DM infant on the globe is an Indian (1). The incidence of T1DM, age of onset of disease, and gender varies in various international studies (2),(3),(4),(5),(6). In India, the overall incidence of T1DM is 10.5/100,000/year and peaks at ages 10-12 years. Incidence also varies according to gender, 4.0/100,000 in girls and 3.7/100,000 in boys (7).

There is a wide variation in the range of children presenting with DKA as the initial manifestation of diabetes depending on the study population. A constellation of socio-demographic factors related to race, ethnicity, age, availability of access to health services, parent education, and socio-economic class plays role in the glycaemic control of disease (8). In India, due to a lack of awareness about diabetes mellitus particularly parents in rural areas tend to ignore the symptoms and delayed treatment leading to serious complications like DKA. They are not well educated about the child’s disease, leading them to search for alternative therapy. Primary care physicians may also miss these patients as symptoms overlap with other systemic diseases (8).

Knowledge among parents regarding symptoms of diabetes is important in early recognition of the disease. This responsibility lies with a paediatrician as most of the patients will attend paediatric Outpatient Department (OPD). Various similar studies have been carried out internationally and in India (1),(3),(7),(9),(10). In India, most of these studies are carried out in South India, where parents are well-educated (1),(2),(11). No study is published on T1DM in children in this region of central India. Hence, present study was carried out to study the clinical profile of children with T1DM in children, aged less than 18 years, so that the information generated can be used to maintain a hospital-based registry for T1DM and to educate the parents as well as ourselves.

Material and Methods

The observational cross-sectional study was done for 24 months, from April 2011 to March 2013 at Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital and Research Centre, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, India. Written consent was taken before the interview from the parents or guardians, and patients who satisfied inclusion criteria after discussing the nature and goal of the work. No written Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) approval is available as it was not mandatory at that time. But it is the paper of thesis which was accepted by NBE board (Ref NBE/ THESIS/131133/ 2013/2943).

Inclusion criteria: Consecutively all newly diagnosed patients with fasting plasma glucose 126 mg/dL, random plasma glucose >200 mg/dL, Glycosylated haemoglobin >6.5% (12), and patients previously diagnosed with T1DM attending the hospital within 24 months were included in the research.

Exclusion criteria: The patients who refused to give consent and those whose required medical records were inadequate, were excluded.

Sample size: The following formula was used for calculating the sample size:

n=Z2 P(1-P)/d2

Where n is the sample size, Z is the statistic corresponding to level of confidence, ‘P’ is expected prevalence and d is precision. ‘Z’ is considered as 95%, prevalence is 31.9/1000000 (5), precision 0.04. sample size calculated was 17 but all the 46 patients during the study period, who attended hospital were enrolled in the study.

Study Procedure

Information was gathered from patients, mothers, fathers, or guardian about the socio-demographic profile, age, treatment history, and symptoms at the interval of diagnosis in previously diagnosed patients, age and symptoms at the presentation. Socio-economic status was categorised according to Modified BG Prasad classification (6).

Detailed clinical examination and anthropometric examination were carried out on all patients. The precipitating factors for DKA such as, infection, missed insulin doses, intercurrent illnesses like trauma, burn, and viral infections were studied. Investigations were recorded from medical reports (13). The Random Blood Sugar (RBS), HbA1c, urine sugar, urine ketone. Venous Blood Gas (VBG) was done in patients with DKA.

RBS was done by glucometer, and urine sugar and urine ketone were done by reagent strip. A total insulin dose in U/kg/day was calculated. The patient was considered moderately stunted if length/height-for-age ≤-2 SD and ≥-3 SD of the median, severely stunted if length/height-for-age <-3 SD of the median (14). Weight for height was used for children less than five years age and Body Mass Index (BMI) is used for children 5-18 years of age as World Health Organisation (WHO) charts are not available for this age (14). When HbA1c levels are categorised into two groups poor control (HbA1c >8.5%) and the good control group (HbA1c <8.5%) this categorisation is validated and previously used in Samanta D et al., study (8).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was done by ratio, percentage, mean and standard deviation. Data were statistically analysed by using the unpaired t-test, Fisher’s test, and comparison of proportion. The SPSS version 26.0 was used for statistical analysis. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 46 patients with T1DM attended the hospital. Out of 46 children, 24 (52.8%) were boys and 22 (47.2%) were girls. A total of 32 (69.6%) were previously diagnosed and attended hospitals. Out of 46, 28 (60.8%) patients presented to the hospital with DKA, and 18 (39.2%) presented with other than DKA. The youngest patient was of 2.5 years of age. In the present study, stunting was noted in 12 (26.08%) patients and wasting in 14 (30.43%) (Table/Fig 1).

Polyuria was the most common presenting complaint in newly diagnosed diabetes patients, followed by the recent weight loss, abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting (Table/Fig 2). Pain in the abdomen and breathlessness were the most common presenting complaints in established diabetics (Table/Fig 3).

Mean HbA1c level was 9.45%. A 56.52% of patients were having poor control of the disease. In this study, stunting was found in diabetic patients with a period of less than one year in 3 (25%) and hagedornmore than one year in 9 (75%) of patients which was statistically significant. The average random blood sugar in less than one year of diabetes was 423±136.9 mg/dL and 359.7±163 mg/dL in more than one year which is not statistically significant (Table/Fig 4).

Patients with poor disease control had a substantially greater mean age (12.3±4.01) years than the group with good control (8.5±3.54) years. Availability of medical facilities, higher socio-economic status, and parents’ education were observed to be strongly connected with good glycaemic control in present study (Table/Fig 5).

The mean insulin demand for newly diagnosed DM was 0.93±0.25 unit/kg/day and in established diabetic patients mean was 1.26±0.34 unit/kg/day in the current research. A 71.7% of patients were on premixed intermediate-acting and regular insulin. All patients used an insulin syringe as injecting device except two patients one was using insulin pump and one used insulin pen for insulin administration.

Discussion

Diabetes Mellitus is one of the most common chronic endocrine and metabolic disorder. It is characterised by insulin deficiency due to destruction of pancreatic β-cell leading to insulin deficiency. Only 10-15% of total diabetic population is of T1DM but it is most common form of diabetes in children.

In India, overall incidence of T1DM 10.5/100,000/year, and peaked at age 10-12 years. Incidence also varies according to gender, 4.0/100,000 in girls and 3.7/100,000 in boys (2). The incidence of T1DM in Karnal, Haryana, is 26.6/100,000 in urban regions along with 4.27/100,000 in rural regions leading to a mean occurrence of 10.20/100,000 per population. The total age-adjusted prevalence of T1DM ranges from 0.7 per 100,000 annually in Karachi (Pakistan) to over 40 per 100,000 annually in Finland (9). T1DM is increasing at a rate of 3-5% percent each year, particularly in younger children (10). T1DM cases in children 1-4 year increased 84000 to 136000 from 2010 to 2015 (11). This rise in incidence, along with improved insulin availability and survival rates, will soon result in a greater prevalence.

Age of onset of T1DM shows bimodal presentation one peak at 4-6 years age and another at puberty [12,15]. Genetic and environmental factors play role in aetiopathogenesis. There is 30% chance of affection of offspring if both parents had history of diabetes or monozygotic twin is affected (12). Against most popular belief autoimmune diseases are common in female, various international studies shows male preponderance (15). Significant number of patients presents with DKA at onset of diseases. Patients present with one of the following symptom polyuria, breathlessness, weight loss, pain in abdomen.

Despite the study’s limited sample size and the fact that it was done at a teaching industrial hospital, this study gives a basic profile of T1DM in this part of the country where studies about T1DM are few. This study shows slight male preponderance which is against the consensus that autoimmune diseases are more common in females same finding is noted in various international studies (13),(14),(16). A 61% of children were diagnosed before completion of the first decade of life out of this 35% was diagnosed in the first five years of life. This varies from most of the studies where the peak age for onset was 10-14 years (13),(15). European Diabetes: Aetiology Of Childhood Diabetes On An Epidemiological Basis (EURODIAB-ACE) suggests the age for onset was 10 to 14 years (17). Family history of T1DM was found in 15.21% of patients nearly similar results are seen in other study (18). Out of 46, 60.8% of patients presented with DKA whereas 39.2% of patients presented with non DKA symptoms. The same outcomes were reported in research from Nepal (19). (Table/Fig 6) shows various studies showing different demographic data (12),(20),(21),(22),(23).

In the current work, the patients who were newly diagnosed presented predominantly with signs of polyuria (85.71%), breathlessness (42.85%), and weight loss (64.28%). The findings are similar to several studies [19,23]. Stunting was noted in 12 of the total diabetics i.e., 26.1%. Out of 12 stunted, 25% had a duration of less than one year, and 75% had the duration of more than one year, which was statistically significant. This shows a subsequent slowing of development as the diabetes duration increases. None of the youngsters were higher than the projected age group. There is conflicting data available on growth in diabetes, stunting is present if the onset of the disease is less than three years of age and height is normal if the onset of the disease is in the pubertal age group (24). A significant number of patients were stunted in the present study because almost 34% of patients were less than five years of age at the onset of the disease. When the disease duration was associated with other characteristics like HbA1c level, stunting, and mean RBS level it was found that only stunting was statistically significant with a duration of disease with a p-value <0.05.

Age was found to be a very important component in glycaemic control in this investigation. The mean age of the patients with poor control was substantially greater than that of the patients with excellent control. Several research provides evidence for this finding [21,22,25]. The average insulin demand was 0.75 units/kg/day of age group 0-5-year-old, 1 unit/kg/day for 5-12-year-old, and 1.4 units/kg/day for age 12 to 18-year-old. In newly diagnosed diabetics, the average insulin demand was 0.93 units/kg/day, but in older diabetics, the average insulin requirement was 1.26 units/kg/day. Many variables determine the daily insulin dose per kilogram of body weight. In pubertal children, the dosage is frequently greater. It is higher in patients with higher glycogen, protein, and fat store deficit and patients with high caloric needs. Most adolescents with new-onset diabetes, on the other hand, retain some residual β cell activity (the “honeymoon” phase), which lessens the requirement for exogenous insulin (17). The average insulin needs in similar trials ranged from 0.7 to 1 units/kg/day in pre-pubertal age group and 1 to 2 units/kg/day during puberty (25).

Out of the total of 46 patients, 71.1% of patients used a premixed (NPH+R) regimen whereas 23.9% were on a separate NPH+R regimen and only one patient was on regular insulin and basal-bolus regimen. Basal-bolus dosage of “Insulin Glargine” and three injections of normal insulin had a considerably greater prevalence of adequate glycaemic control and fewer episodes of hypoglycaemia (24) than the premixed NPH+R regimen (26). This could not be evaluated from the present study as very few patients were on other than a pre-mixed regimen. All patients were using insulin syringes for the administration of insulin except two one using an insulin pen and one insulin pump.

Limitation(s)

This study was of its first kind from this region but the observations of the study cannot be generalised.

Conclusion

The DKA must be considered as a differential diagnosis for respiratory distress even in a patient less than five years of age. Polyuria was the most common symptom in newly diagnosed diabetics. Breathlessness and pain abdomen were predominant symptoms in established T1DM. Most of the children landed in DKA requiring hospital admission. The authors recommend there is a need for a study on T1DM in children less than five years of age. Also, longitudinal studies with larger sample size should be conducted for better results.

References

1.
Kumar KMP, Azad K, Zabeen B, Kalra S. Type 1 diabetes in children: Fighting for a place under the sun. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16(Suppl1):S1-03. [crossref]
2.
Kalra S, Dhingra M. Childhood diabetes in India. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2018;23(3):126-30. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Kahkoska AR, Shay CM, Crandell J, Dabelea D, Imperatore G, Lawrence JM, et al. Association of race and ethnicity with glycaemic control and hemoglobin A1c levels in youth with Type 1 diabetes. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(5):e181851. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Pourhoseingholi MA, Vahedi M, Rahimzadeh M. Sample size calculation in medical studies. winter 2013;6(1):14-17.
5.
Kumar KMP. Incidence trends for childhood type 1 diabetes in India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2015;19(Suppl 1):S34-35. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Pandey V, Aggarwal P, Kakkar R. Modified BG Prasad Socio-economic Classification, Update-2019. Indian J Community Health. 2019;31(1):123-25. [crossref]
7.
Guideline: Assessing and managing children at primary health-care facilities to prevent overweight and obesity in the context of the double burden of malnutrition [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789241550123.
8.
Samanta D, Mallika V, Yadav S. Early microalbuminuria in adolescent Type 1 diabetic patients: Experience from a pediatric endocrine clinic in a developing country. Afr J Med Case Rep. 2017;5(11):01-05.
9.
Kliegman R, Nelson WE, editors. Nelson textbook of pediatrics. 19th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders; 2011. Pp. 2610.
10.
Das AK. Type 1 diabetes in India: Overall insights. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2015;19(Suppl 1):S31-33. Doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.155372. PMID: 25941645; PMCID: PMC4413384. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Adeloye D, Chan KY, Thorley N, Jones C, Johnstone D, L’Heveder A, et al. Global and regional estimates of the morbidity due to type I diabetes among children aged 0-4 years: A systematic review and analysis. J Glob Health. 2018;8(2):021101. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Faisal KK, Chandani. Study of clinical profile of type1 diabetes mellitus cases attending tertiary care hospital in northern Kerala. Int J Health Clin Res. 2021;4(4):48-52. Available at: https://ijhcr.com/index.php/ijhcr/article/view/970.
13.
Yock-Corrales A, Gonzalez-Volio M, Leiton C, Cavallo-Aita F, Bogarin R. Presentation of children with diabetic ketoacidosis in a tertiary pediatric emergency department in costa rica. Pediatr Emerg Care Med Open Access [Internet]. 2016 Aug 2 [cited 2023 Mar 21];1(1). Available from: https://pediatric-emergency-care.imedpub.com/abstract/presentation-of-children-with-diabeticrnketoacidosis-in-a-tertiary-pediatricrnemergency-department-in-costa-rica-11363.html.
14.
Clinical Demographic Patterns of Type 1 Diabetes in Saudi Children in Tabuk City, 2000-2010 [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=76050.
15.
Poyrazog? lu S¸ , Bundak R, Yavas¸ Abal Z, Önal H, Sarikaya S, Akgün A, et al. Incidence of Type 1 diabetes in children aged below 18 years during 2013-2015 in Northwest Turkey. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol [Internet]. 2018 May 23 [cited 2023 Mar 19]; Available from: http://cms.galenos.com.tr/Uploads/Article_18127/JCRPE-10-336-En.pdf. [crossref]
16.
Diabetes Mellitus: Diagnosis, Classification, and Pathophysiology | Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, 19e|Access Medicine|McGraw Hill Medical [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 17]. Available from: https://accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=1130§ionid=79752868.
17.
Lévy-Marchal C, Patterson C, Green A. Variation by age group and seasonality at diagnosis of childhood IDDM in Europe. The EURODIAB ACE Study Group. Diabetologia. 1995;38(7):823-30. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Parkkola A, Härkönen T, Ryhänen SJ, Ilonen J, Knip M, Finnish Pediatric Diabetes Register. Extended family history of type 1 diabetes and phenotype and genotype of newly diagnosed children. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(2):348-54. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Moktan D, Ghising L, Singh R. Clinical profile of type 1 diabetes mellitus among children in eastern part of Nepal. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2019;6:583. [crossref]
20.
Passanisi S, Salzano G, Gasbarro A, Urzì Brancati V, Mondio M, Pajno GB, et al. Influence of age on partial clinical remission among children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(13):4801. Doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134801. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Prasad D, Arpita, Awasthi S. A retrospective case study of clinical profile of hospitalized children with type 1 diabetes mellitus at a tertiary health care center in northern India. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2013;1(3):137-41. [crossref]
22.
Ameyaw E, Asafo-Agyei SB, Thavapalan S, Middlehurst AC, Ogle GD. Clinical profile of diabetes at diagnosis among children and adolescents at an endocrine clinic in Ghana. World J Diabetes. 2017;8(9):429.[crossref][PubMed]
23.
Rafique M, Ishaq F, Masood MK, Al-Qahtani YAM, Assiri WIA, Assiri MAA, et al. Clinical profile of type 1 diabetes mellitus in Saudi children: A hospital based study. Ann King Edw Med Univ [Internet]. 2016 Dec 17 [cited 2023 Mar 18];22(4):251-56. Available from: https://annalskemu.org/journal/index.php/annals/article/view/1458. [crossref]
24.
Khadilkar VV, Parthasarathy LS, Mallade BB, Khadilkar AV, Chiplonkar SA, Borade AB. Growth status of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013;17(6):1057-60. Doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.122623. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
ISPAD Guidelines 2018-Chapter 8: Glycaemic control targets and glucose monitoring for children- International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jan 21]. Available from: https://www.ispad.org/ page/Guidelines2018Chap8.
26.
Silver B, Ramaiya K, Andrew SB, Fredrick O, Bajaj S, Kalra S, et al. EADSG guidelines: insulin therapy in diabetes. Diabetes Ther. 2018;9(2):449-92.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/58298.18114

Date of Submission: Jun 06, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jul 13, 2022
Date of Acceptance: May 10, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes (from parents)
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 11, 2022
• Manual Googling: Apr 24, 2023
• iThenticate Software: May 09, 2023 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com