Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 89982

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : EC15 - EC18 Full Version

Clinico-Histomorphological Spectrum and CD34 in Gastro-Intestinal Stromal Tumours: An Experience from Tertiary Care Centre, Kolkata, India


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/61376.18172
Sarbashis Hota, Sukanya Ghosh, Tushar Kanti Das, Anjali Bandyopadhyay

1. Senior Resident, Department of Pathology, R G Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Pathology, R G Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, R G Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 4. Professor, Department of Pathology, R G Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Sarbashis Hota,
House No. 840/10, Raghunathpur, Jhargram, Kolkata-721507, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: sarbashishota94@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours (GISTs) are an important subcategory of mesenchymal tumours of gastrointestinal tract. The discovery of c-kit mutation in a subset of GIST has made amenable the treatment of this entity by targeted therapy. Although, Cluster of Differentiation 34 (CD34) is a well-established marker aiding in diagnosis of GIST, recent development of novel markers like Discovered on GIST1 (DOG1), CD117 have undermined its value. Still it’s a frequently used marker in the resource poor settings.

Aim: To study the expression of CD34 immunomarker with respect to site, grade, stage, histomorphological type and risk category of GIST specimens received in the stipulated time period.

Materials and Methods: An observational retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Pathology at R G Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. The duration of the study was three years and 11 months, from September 1, 2019 to August 31, 2022. All the samples diagnosed as GISTs within the study period, were taken from the received specimens in the department and immunohistochemical examination was done on the selected samples using monoclonal antibodies against CD34 after obtaining thin sections from formalin fixed paraffin embedded blocks and retrieval of antigen. The data was interpreted by light microscopy using a semi-quantitative method with respect to prefixed parameters, where 50% proportional positivity of CD34 in the tumour cells was considered as positive. The data was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0.

Results: Mean age of the study participants was 49.78 years. A total of 8 (34.7%) cases originating from stomach and 13 (56.5%) from intestine. Eight out of 23 (34.7%) cases showed positive expression of the marker. Six out of eight cases of gastric GISTs were found to be positive and 66.6% cases of high grade GISTs were positive for CD34. Statistically significant association was found between expression of CD34 and the site of tumour-GISTs arising from stomach, particularly of spindle cell type, showing strong expression (p=0.003). It was found that, high grade GISTs are more likely to be positive for CD34. None of the epithelioid GISTs have shown positivity, neither any significant association was evident between expression of this marker with tumour stage or risk category.

Conclusion: The GISTs arising from stomach, particularly of spindle cell type, are more likely to show strong CD34 expression. Higher grade GISTs were found to be associated with positive CD34 expression in the present study, but no significant association was evident between expression of this marker.

Keywords

Cluster of differentiation 34, Immunohistochemistry, Risk stratification

The GISTs are an important subcategory of mesenchymal tumours of gastrointestinal tract. Originating from the interstitial cells of Cajal, these tumours commonly present as an eccentric mass from the wall of gut, often without any mucosal involvement. The discovery of c-kit mutation in a subset of GIST has made amenable the treatment of this entity by targeted therapy (1). Gain of function mutations of c-kit (exon 11 and exon 9) and Platelet-derived Growth Factor Receptor Alpha (PDGFRA) (exon 18, pD842V mutation) are found to be responsible for majority of GISTs- modulating the Rat Sarcoma Virus/Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase (RAS/MAPK) and Phosphoinositide 3 Kinase/Protein Kinase B/Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin (PI3K/AKT/mTOR) pathway (1). Kit mutations are commonly associated with small intestinal tumours and have greater metastatic potential than those of PDGFRA mutation containing GISTs, which have a predilection towards involving stomach (2). The genomic structure of tumours was found to have important prognostic significance, particularly kit exon 11 mutations, show very good response with imatinib.

The CD34 is a transmembrane phosphoglycoprotein, expressed in early haematopoietic stem cells and endothelial cells (3). Along with GISTs, tumours like dermatofibrosarcoma protruberans and haemangiopericytoma are known to express CD34. Although, CD34 is a well-established marker aiding in diagnosis of GIST, recent development of novel markers like DOG1, CD117 have undermined its value (1). Still it’s a frequently used marker in the resource poor settings owing to its easy availability. Although, numerous studies have focussed on the expression of CD34 in GISTs [4-6], studies on this matter from perspective of Eastern India is lacking, as per the best of author’s knowledge. And also, the differential expression of this marker in GIST, according to site and risk stratification has not been studied much. The present study aimed at evaluation of the efficiency of CD34 in diagnosis of GIST and study of its expression patterns with variables like site, grade, stage, histomorphological type and risk group and to study the clinico-histomorphological spectrum of GIST specimens received within the stipulated time period. Also, to categorise the cases as per the risk stratification endorsed by College of American Pathologists (CAP) (7);

• To study the clinico-histomorphological spectrum of GIST specimens received within the stipulated time period;
• To categorise the cases, as per the risk stratification endorsed by CAP (7);

Material and Methods

An observational retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Pathology at R G Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. The duration of the study was three years and 11 months, from September 1, 2019-August 31, 2022. The data analysis was done from 1st September, 2022 to 1st November, 2022. Study was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) letter number (IEC Reg No ECR/322/Inst/WB/2013). The sample size thus, became 23. Thin sections of 2-3 micrometre were obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded blocks.

Inclusion criteria: The resected tumour specimens of GI tract morphologically diagnosed as GISTs on histopathological examination, received within the study duration were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: The core/incisional biopsy specimens of GIST and other forms of stromal tumours of alimentary tract were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Heat Induced Epitope Retrieval (HIER) procedure was done by microwave method using TRIS buffer, EMPARTA, pH 9.0. TRIS buffer (EMPARTA, pH 7.2) was used for washing. Endogenous peroxidise activity was blocked with PolyExcel peroxidase block, (PathnSitu) incubation with primary antibody (monoclonal antibody against CD34, EP88, PathnSitu) was done at 37oC for 60 minutes. For visualisation of result, serial incubation for 30 minutes each was carried out with PolyExcel target binder, PathnSitu; Poly HRP (PolyExcel Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP) Diaminobenzidine (DAB) detection system, PathnSitu) and chromogen (Polyexcel stunn DAB buffer and Polyexcel stunn DAB chromogen, PathnSitu). The staging, risk categorisation and grading was performed by protocol generated by CAP, which followed the recommendations of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), 8th edition for staging (4). Grading was based on mitotic figure count per 50 high power fields.

Statistical Analysis

The data was interpreted by light microscopy using a semi-quantitative method (50% proportional positivity of CD34 in the tumour cells was considered as positive) (5) and statistical analysis was done by SPSS version 25.0. Chi-square test and Fisher’s-exact test were used for calculating p-value and a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Total 23 cases of GIST has been included in the study, among which 39.1 % were from males and rest were from females (60.9%). Mean age of cases were 49.78 years. Total 86.9% cases were spindle cell GISTs, whereas, only 3 (13.1%) cases were of epithelioid morphology (two from stomach and one extra-gastrointestinal). Two cases of gastric GIST were frankly metastatic, one involved liver and the other involved spleen. (both of the cases were histomorphologically spindle cell type and high grade) (Table/Fig 1).

Three sites were detected for tumours, i.e., stomach, intestine and messentary/retroperitoneum. Out of which, stomach showed maximum CD34 positivity (six cases). Statistically significant association was found between CD34 expression with the site of GIST (p=0.003) (Table/Fig 2).

A total of 8 (40%) cases of spindle cell type GIST have shown positive expression of CD34 (Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5).

Based on the mitotic figure evaluation, 60.8% cases were of low-grade while high grade tumour comprised 39.2% cases (Table/Fig 6). AJCC staging is entirely based on the size of tumour. In the present study, 43.5% cases each presented with T3 and T4 stage, only 13% presented with T2 stage (Table/Fig 7). Based on CAP endorsed risk stratification scheme, 4.3% were of very low risk, 8.6% low risk, 30.4% moderate risk, and 56.5% high risk cases were found (Table/Fig 8).

Discussion

Mean age of presentation of the 23 cases was found to be 49.78 years. A 60.9% cases were female with 39.1% cases from male population. The lowest age of presentation is at 33 years. In the fifth and sixth decade, the female cases have outnumbered male, whereas, it is equally distributed in the upper and lower extremes of ages. In contrary to the global prevalence pattern, in the centre, small intestinal GISTs (56.5%) have outnumbered the GISTs arising from stomach (34.6%). This finding is coherent with the report published by Sengupta R et al., from the same state in 2020, from other similar tertiary care Institutions (8). This may be due to the fact that, intestinal GISTs often present early with features of intestinal obstruction, thus, are more often recognised than their gastric counterparts. This may have accounted for the over-representation of these cases in author’s experience. The same study has expressed concern on the rising prevalence of GIST cases in India (6). Additionally, two cases of extra-gastrointestinal GISTs (eGIST) were found; one arising from retroperitoneum and another located in mesentery.

The gross feature of presentation was also fascinating. Although, most cases presented as an eccentric mass arising from the wall of GI tract sparing the mucosa (often enormous in size); one case presented with a pedunculated globular mass hanging from outer aspect of the small gut. A particularly interesting case was that of a 37-year-old female patient, which presented as a dumbbell shaped mass in stomach, protruding into both mucosal and serosal aspect, piercing the muscularis propria. The case, removed by gastrostomy, was diagnosed histologically as epithelioid GIST. Overall, 34.7% cases have shown positive expression of CD34. In negative cases, the endothelial cells of the blood vessels served as positive internal control. Statistically significant association was found between expression of CD34 and the site of tumour; GISTs arising from stomach, particularly of spindle cell type, showing strong expression (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4). This is concordant with the study of Hirota S, who found that, over 90% of gastric GIST of spindle cell type show positive expression of CD34 but, almost half of the spindle cell GISTs (other than gastric origin) show negative expression (Table/Fig 5) (4). However, none of the epithelioid GISTs have expressed CD34 in the present study, whereas, about half of the epithelioid GISTs were positive in the study of Hirota S (4).

The findings are also congruent with that of Miettinen M et al., who analysed 96 cases of GIST (67 benign, six borderline and 23 malignant) and found that, the small intestinal tumours were more commonly CD34 negative (5),(6). The low total CD34 positive proportion (only 34.7%) apparent in the present study scenario is probably due to over-representation of the cases of small intestinal GISTs (70% of the benign spindle cell GISTs gave positive expression for CD34 in their study). Different aspects of diagnosis, molecular pathogenesis and therapeutic implications of GIST are elaborated by Koh Y et al., Robinson TL et al., Makar RR et al., Wu C-E et al., and Ceausu M et al., (9),(10),(11),(12),(13). Kim KM et al., examined 747 cases of GISTs diagnosed between 2001 and 2002 (14). The c-kit expression was found in 93.6% of cases and CD34 was positive in 80.1% cases. The positivity of CD34 was associated with higher risk of GISTs, according to their findings.

In the present study, however, higher grade GISTs have shown a propensity of positive CD34 expression (66.6% cases of high grade GIST were positive for CD34) (Table/Fig 6). No significant association was evident between expression of this marker with tumour stage or risk category (Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8). Malik K et al., Rajappa S et al., Lakshmi VA et al., Iqbal N et al., Minhas S et al., have discussed various aspects of GIST from different centres of Indian subcontinent (15),(16),(17),(18),(19). The disparities between findings from different studies with that of global literature, necessitate large scale studies from India for assessment of this disease, as aptly pointed out by Minhas S et al., (19).

Limitation(s)

The small number of specimens included in the study is the biggest limitation. The results need further confirmation from a wider study design. The relatively low prevalence of GIST as compared to the epithelial tumours of GI tract, requires a lengthier duration of study to get more cases. The relative expression of other newer markers, (along with that of CD34) could not be studied owing to financial constraint, which may have provided data of greater clinical importance.

Conclusion

The GISTs arising from stomach, particularly of spindle cell type, are more likely to show strong CD34 expression, which is concordant with the findings of existing literature. Higher grade GISTs were found to be associated with positive CD34 expression in the present study; but, no significant association was evident between expression of this marker with tumour stage or risk category.

References

1.
WHO Classification of Tumours of Gastro-intestinal tract, 5th Edition, 2019.
2.
Rosai & Ackermann, Textbook of Surgical Pathology, 8th Edition.
3.
Dabbs DJ. Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry: Theranostic and genomic applications. Elsevier, Fifth Edition.
4.
Hirota S. Differential diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumour by histopathoogy and immunohistochemistry. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3:27. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Miettinen M, Virolainen M, Maaritsarlomo-Rikala. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours-value of CD34 antigen in their separation from true leiomyomas and schwannomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995;19(2):207-16. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Miettinen M, Sobin L, Sarlomo-Rikala M. Immunohistochemical spectrum of GISTs at different sites and their differential diagnosis with a reference to CD117(KIT). Mod Pathol. 2000;13:1134-42. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
College of American Pathologists. Protocol for the examination of resection specimens from patients with Gastro Intestinal Stromal Tumour (GIST). August, 2019.
8.
Sengupta R, Bose A, Sivakumar P, Patel P, Das R, Mandal S, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST): Is the incidence rising in India? A hospital based analysis. International Journal of Health and Clinical Research. 2020;3(12):235-43.
9.
Koh Y, Lee HE, Oh DY, Kim JH, Lee SH, Kim SH, et al. The lack of CD34 expression in gastrointestinal stromal tumours is related to cystic degeneration following Imatinib use. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2012;42(11):1020-27.[crossref][PubMed]
10.
Robinson TL, Sircar K, Hewlett BR, Chorneyko K, Riddell RH, Huizinga JD. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours may originate from a subset of CD34 positive interstitial cells of Cajal. Am J Pathol. 2000;156(4):1157-63. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Makar RR, Al-Waheeb S, John B, Junaid TA. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features. Med Principles Pract. 2002;11:93-99. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Wu CE, Tzen CY, Wang SY, Yeh CN. Clinical diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST): From the molecular genetic point of view. Cancers. 2019;11(5):679. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Ceausu M, Socea B, Ciobotaru VP, Constantin VD, Enache S, Enache V, et al. A multidisciplinary approach in the diagnostic challenge of GIST. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2021;22:1063. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Kim KM, Kang DW, Moon WS, Park JB, Park CK, Sohn JH, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours in Koreans: It’s incidence and the clinical, pathologic and immunohistochemical findings. J Korean Med Sci. 2005;20(6):977-84. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Malik K, Seshadri RA, Sundersingh S, Dhanuskodi M. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST): Indian experience of rare malignancy. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020;11(3):348-54. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Rajappa S, Muppavarapu KM, Uppin S, Digumarti R. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: A single Institution experience of 50 cases. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2007;26:225-29.
17.
Lakshmi VA, Chacko RT, Kurian S. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: A 7 year experience from a tertiay care hospital. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2010;53:628-33. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Iqbal N, Sharma A, Shukla NK, Mohanti BK, Deo SVS, Sahni P, et al. Advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours: 10 years experience from a tertiary care centre. Tropical Gastroenterology. 2015;36(3):168-73. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Minhas S, Bhalla S, Jahuri M, Ganvir M, Aggarwal S. Clinico-pathological characteristics and mutational analysis of Gastrointestinal stromal tumours from India: A single Institution experience. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019;20(10):3051-55.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/61376.18172

Date of Submission: Nov 25, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jan 11, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Apr 07, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 28, 2022
• Manual Googling: Feb 03, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Mar 29, 2023 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 9

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com