Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 90779

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : EC01 - EC04 Full Version

Spectrum of Colorectal Polyps in Southern India: A Twin Centre Ambispective Study


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60506.18142
Afshan Jabeen, V Vijay Sreedhar

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Shadan Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 2. Professor and Head, Bhaskar Medical College (Retired HOD, Osmania Medical College), Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Correspondence Address :
Afshan Jabeen,
12-2-204, Murad Nagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
E-mail: afshanjabeen30887@rediff.com

Abstract

Introduction: Intestinal polyps are grossly visible tumours which protrude (into lumen of gastrointestinal tract). Majority of the polyps are benign in the paediatric age group. However in adults, they may be harbingers of more serious genetic, familial or developmental disorders and some of them may be premalignant.

Aim: Our aim was to study the distribution, histological varieties of colorectal polyps and to examine dysplasia in adenomatous polyps and its determinants.

Materials and Methods: This is a four years retrospective and one year prospective study from June 2017 to May 2022 conducted at Upgraded Department of Pathology, Osmania General Hospital and a tertiary care centre, Shadan Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. A total of 110 cases of polyps were studied which included 62 cases in adults and 48 cases in children (0-12 years). Predictors of dysplasia in adenomatous polyps were studied. Results were analysed using PSPP software.

Results: There were 62.73% (69) males and 37.27% (41) females. The commonest clinical presentation was bleeding from rectum 64.54% (71) cases. Rectosigmoid was the commonest site in 83.64% (92) cases. Juvenile polyps were the commonest in children and constituted 89.58% (43 cases). In adults, there were 63.07% (41) adenomatous polyps. A statistically significant association has been observed between high grade dysplasia and size (p-value 0.015) and villous architecture (p-value 0.02). There was no statistically significant association with site (p-value 0.2).

Conclusion: A rising incidence of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) has necessitated identification of preneoplastic Adenomatous polyps which may progress to carcinoma via the Adenomacarcinoma sequence. Polyps occurring as part of polyposis syndromes have increased neoplastic potential. Their detection and treatment carries significant implications both for the patients and their families. In India, there is a need for screening colonoscopy in asymptomatic individuals which can be a potential cancer prevention tool.

Keywords

Adenomas, Benign, Dysplasia, Juvenile polyps, Villous adenomas

The word polyp comes from the Greek word ‘polypus’ meaning ‘many footed’. Intestinal polyps are grossly visible tumours which protrude into lumen of gastrointestinal tract (1). They may be sporadic or part of polyposis syndromes.

The pathologist assumes a critical role in the diagnosis of a polypoidal lesion as the adequacy of resection, the accurate description and identification of the type of polyp can have significant implications for the patient along with the associates. It is important to realise that a biopsy of a polypoidal lesion is similar to examining the “tip of the iceberg”. Although majority of the polyps in the paediatric age group are benign - where as in adults, more often they may be harbingers of more serious genetic, familial or developmental disorders and some of them may be premalignant (1).

The term “colorectal polyps” includes both neoplastic and non neoplastic lesions. In children, solitary Juvenile polyps are the commonest. Estimates reveal that they occur in 2% of children under 10 years of age and cause rectal bleeding commonly. They are benign and carry no neoplastic potential. However, when as part of Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome (JPS), they predispose to malignancy (2).

JPS has an incidence of 1 in 100,000-160,000 individuals (2). The diagnosis of JPS is clinically established based upon the presence of atleast one of the following criteria (1) more than five juvenile polyps of the colorectum, or (2) juvenile polyps throughout the gastrointestinal tract, or (3) any number of juvenile polyps with a family history of JPS (1). Individuals with JPS are at risk for the development of malignancy as the polyps can show adenomatous change and transformation to carcinoma (2).

Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome (PJS), an autosomal-dominant disorder characterised by mucocutaneous pigmentation, hamartomatous polyps, and an increased risk of malignancies. It has a reported incidence of one in 150,000 to 200,000 individual (2).

In adults, adenomatous polyps are the most frequently occurring polyps with a reported incidence of 7-27%. They are considered to be precursors of large bowel cancer, through a process referred to as adenoma-carcinoma sequence (3). Although only few adenomas progress to malignancy, the risk of cancer development increases with the size, the amount of villous component and the occurrence of higher grades of dysplasia (4).

Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in men and fourth most common cause of deaths from cancer worldwide (5). The incidence of CRC has been reported to be 20.7% (2). Despite the lower incidence in Asian countries, including India, adoption of Western lifestyles and dietary patterns has led to a rapid transition towards Western rates (6).

Early detection and removal of adenomas can significantly reduce the risk of CRC. It is believed that a one-time screening colonoscopy at the age of 55 years could achieve a 30-50% reduction in mortality from CRC (7). The incidence of CRC has been declining in the United States due to widespread CRC screening and change in behavioural risk factors (8).

Among the non neoplastic polyps, hyperplastic polyps are common. They account for 8-10% of polyps detected. Although, they are considered to be benign, recent studies have shown that some of the subsets of hyperplastic polyps have neoplastic potential (9).

We have observed that there is a dearth of literature pertaining to polyps in the Indian population and hence further studies are required in this terrain. A retrospective study was conducted to determine the prevalence and histopathological characteristics of polyps in tertiary centre in South India (10). However, it shed light more on the characteristics of polyps in adults. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the polyp characteristics in children and adults.

The aim of this study was 1) To analyse demographics of patients with colorectal polyps, 2) To study the distribution and histological types of colorectal polyps, 3) To examine dysplasia in adenomatous polyps and its determinants. Further, to compare present study with literature. As this study covered a period of five years, we had an opportunity for follow-up to observe for any recurrence.

Material and Methods

This is an observational study, conducted at 2 tertiary care centres: Upgraded Department of Pathology, Osmania General Hospital and Shadan Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. Data was collected four years retrospectively (June 2017 to May 2021) and one year prospectively (June 2021 to May 2022). A total of 110 cases of polyps were studied including 48 (43.63%) cases in children and 62 (56.36%) cases in adults. Both polypectomy and bowel resection specimens were studied. Ethical clearance was obtained from relevant centres (012/SIMS/RESEARCH/2022). Informed consent was taken from the participants.

Inclusion criteria: All polypoidal lesions in the colorectal region detected clinically and by imaging were included.

Exclusion criteria: Pseudopolyps associated with ulcerative colitis were excluded.

Polyps presenting in other parts of gastrointestinal tract were excluded.

Demographic data, clinical features, radiological features, polyp number and distribution were obtained from medical records. The specimens were routinely processed and sections stained with H&E. Polyps were classified into different types based on WHO criteria (1). Adenomatous polyps were further classified into tubular, villous and tubulovillous types and were examined for dysplasia.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was done using PSPP software, an open source application. Association of dysplasia with site/size and type of adenomatous polyp was studied using Chi-square test.

Results

Among 1762 colorectal resection and biopsy specimens, 110 (6.24%) polyp cases were studied, which included 48 (43.63%) cases in children and 62 (56.36%) cases in adults. There were 69 (62.73%) males and 41 (37.27%) females (Table/Fig 1).

In children, highest proportion- 15 (31.2%) occured in age group of 6-8 years with a mean age of 6.62 years. In adults, majority- 64.52% (40) occurred between 50-80 years with a mean age of 56.5 years. The most common clinical presentation was bleeding per rectum-64.54% (71). The other presenting features were anaemia, altered bowel habits, abdominal pain and intussusception. The commonest site was rectosigmoid 83.63% (92). 93.63% (103) were pedunculated polyps while 6.37% (7) were sessile. 56.36% (62) of the polyps measured less than 1cm while 43.63% (48) measured more than 1 cm. 80.9% (89) were solitary while 19.1% (21) were multiple.

In children, juvenile polyps were the commonest accounting for 89.58% (43) of the cases [Table/Fig-2-4]. In adults, adenomatous 2polyps were the commonest, constituting 63.07% (41) of the cases (Table/Fig 5). Among the adenomas, tubular adenomas were the commonest accounting for 63.41% (26) of the cases and sessile serrated adenoma was the least common-2.43% (1) (Table/Fig 6) (1).

Four cases of adenomatous polyps presented as part of a syndrome of Adenomatous polyposis. Two cases of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP), post total colectomy presented with polyps in the rectal stump. One case of adenomatous polyp had a family history of FAP and on follow-up examination, developed another polyp. Three cases of adenomatous polyps were associated with an adjacent Adenocarcinoma. Among them, two were villous adenomas and one was tubular adenoma and all three measured more than 1 cm and showed high grade dysplasia. Among the adenomatous polyps, villous adenomas tended to be of larger size with majority of them being more than 1 cm and many of the villous adenomas were associated with high grade dysplasia.

There is evidence that dysplasia is a valid marker of the potential for malignant transformation of colorectal adenomas. Hence, taking high grade dysplasia as a variable which reflects possibility of malignant transformation, we studied the association of dysplasia with site, size and villous architecture using chi-square test.

There was no significant statistical association of high grade dysplasia with site (p-value-0.2)

There was a significant statistical association between dysplasia and size (p-value-0.015) (Table/Fig 7).

There was a significant statistical association between high grade dysplasia and villous architecture (p-value of 0.02) (Table/Fig 8).

Discussion

We observed that the overall incidence of polyps is lesser in India compared to western countries. Our observed incidence (6.24%) was comparable with Amarapurkar AD et al., (10.3%) (11).

Kastuar S et al., have reported a slightly higher incidence in Indians living in USA which could be due to lifestyle changes. However, the incidence reported by Kastuar S et al., is still less when compared with the incidence reported in National polyp study of USA indicating that Indians have a lower incidence of polyps (12),(13). Another view may be that there is an underestimation in India as a result of scarcity of focused studies and lack of screening colonoscopy. We have observed a predilection in males (62.73%) and our results are comparable with Jain M et al., (76.9%) and national polyp study, USA (62%) (Table/Fig 9) (13),(14).

Our observation that the majorityof paediatric polyps occur between 6 to 8 years with a mean age of 6.62 years are comparable with studies by Latt TT et al., (5.6 years) and Rathi C et al., (7.31 years) (15),(16). In adults, we have observed a mean age of 56.5 years which is comparable with other studies like Amarapurkar AD et al., (54.8 years) and National polyp study, USA.(62 years) (11),(13).

Our observation of bleeding per rectum being the commonest presenting symptom (64.54%) is supported by Zare-Mirzaie A et al., (32%) (17). We have observed a larger proportion of patients to be symptomatic. One possible reason could be a lack of screening colonoscopy in asymptomatic patients, as a result of which patients present at a later stage with symptoms.

Our finding of Rectosigmoid region being the commonest site (83.64%) has been corroborated by Giuliani A et al., (88%), Rathi C et al., (97.3%) and Wei C et al., (83.9%) (4),(16),(18).

We have observed a predominance of solitary polyps (80.9%) and this has been confirmed by Wei C et al., (88.4%) and Roma-Giannikou ES et al., (95%) (18),(19).

We have observed Juvenile polyp to be the commonest type of paediatric polyp (89.58%) which is confirmed by Lei P et al., (71%), Latt TT et al., (83%) and Roma-Giannikou ES et al., (95%) (15),(19),(20). In adults, Adenomatous polyp was found to be to be the commonest and this has been corroborated by Amarapurkar AD et al., (52.4%), Shilpa K et al., (60%) and Zare-Mirzaie A et al., (84%) (11),(17),(21).

Among the adenomas, Tubular adenomas were the commonest comparable with Zare-Mirzaie A et al., (17). However, higher proportion of villous adenomas were observed in this study based on the available literature research. This observation has also been made by Kastuar S et al., among Indians residing in USA and they have stated that although polyps overall are less common in Indians, premalignant polyps are more frequent (12). We have observed a positive association between high grade dysplasia and size. This finding has been supported by Amarapurkar AD et al., and Zare-Mirzaie A et al., (11),(22). We have also observed a positive association between villous architecture and high grade dysplasia. This finding has been supported by Zare-Mirzaie A et al., (22). We have not observed any correlation between high grade dysplasia and location which has been supported by Tony J et al., and contradicted by Zhan T et al., (23),(24).

Limitation(s)

We have collected our cases from symptomatic individuals who visited the hospital so our study may not accurately reflect the prevalence of polyps. Increased screening in asymptomatic individuals will correctly reflect the actual prevalence. Another limitation is that we could not do risk factors assessment.

Conclusion

A rising incidence of CRC necessitates the identification of colorectal polyps, especially the Adenomatous polyps as they may progress to carcinoma as per the adenoma carcinoma sequence. Polyps occurring as part of polyposis syndromes have increased neoplastic potential. Their detection and treatment carries significant implications both for the patients and his family. In India, there is a need for screening colonoscopy in asymptomatic individuals which can serve as a potential cancer prevention tool.

References

1.
Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA. World health organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system. IARC Press: Lyon. 2000:103-42.
2.
Manfredi M. Hereditary hamartomatous polyposis syndromes: Understanding the disease risks as children reach adulthood. Gastroenterol Hepatol (NY). 2010;6(3):185-96.
3.
Giacosa A, Frascio F, Munizzi F. Epidemiology of colorectal polyps. Tech Coloproctol. 2004;8(2):s243-47. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Giuliani A, Caporale A, Corona M, Ricciardulli T, Di Bari M, Demoro M, et al. Large size, villous content and distal location are associated with severe dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Anticancer Res. 2006;26(5B):3717-22.
5.
Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(12):2893-917. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Sung JJ, Lau JY, Goh KL, Leung WK. Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in Asia: Implications for screening. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:871-76. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Frazier AL, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS, Kuntz KM. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. JAMA. 2000;284:1954-61. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71-96. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Higuchi T, Jass JR. My approach to serrated polyps of the colorectum. J Clin Pathol. 2004;57(7):682-86. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Jagtap N, Singh AP, Pradev I. Detection of colon polyps in India- A large retrospective cohort study (DoCPIr). J Dig Endosc. 2021;12:63-66. [crossref]
11.
Amarapurkar AD, Nichat P, Narawane N, Amarapurkar D. Frequency of colonic adenomatous polyps in a tertiary hospital in Mumbai. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2016;35(4):299-304. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Kastuar S, Narayanan S, Kastuar S, Pitchumoni CS. Prevalence of colon polyps in asymptomatic indians undergoing screening colonoscopy in the USA. Practical Gastroenterol. 2011;23:41-42.
13.
O’Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Diaz B, et al. The national polyp study. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology. 1990;98(2):371-79. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Jain M, Vij M, Srinivas M, Michael T, Venkataraman J. Spectrum of colonic polyps in a South Indian Urban cohort. J Dig Endosc. 2017;8:119-22. [crossref]
15.
Latt TT, Nicholl R, Domizio P, Walker-Smith JA, Williams CB. Rectal bleeding and polyps. Arch Dis Child. 1993;69(1):144-47. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Rathi C, Ingle M, Pandav N, Pipaliya N, Choksi D, Sawant P. Clinical, endoscopic, and pathologic characteristics of colorectal polyps in Indian children and adolescents. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2015;34(6):453-57. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Zare-Mirzaie A, Abolhasani M, Moghaddam RM, Kabivar M. The frequency of gastrointestinal polyps in Iranian population. Iranian Journal of Pathology. 2012;7(3):183-89.
18.
Wei C, Dayong W, Liqun J, Xiaoman W, Yu W, Xiaohong Q. Colorectal polyps in children: A retrospective study of clinical features and the value of ultrasonography in their diagnosis. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(10):1853-58. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Roma-Giannikou ES, Papazoglou TA, Panayiotou JV, Van Vliet CP, Kitsiou S, Syriopoulou V, et al. Colon polyps in childhood: Increased mucosal eosinophilia in juvenile polyps. Annals of Gastroenterology. 2008;21(4):229-32.
20.
Lei P, Gu F, Hong L, Sun Y, Li M, Wang H, et al. Pediatric colonoscopy in South China: A 12-year experience in a tertiary center. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e95933. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Shilpa K, Sharathkumarh HK, Monica GS, Mathew N. Histomorphological spectrum of colorectal polyps. Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research. 2017;5(1):15791-94. [crossref]
22.
Zare-Mirzaie A, Abolhasani M, Aryamanesh A. Left sided colorectal adenomatous polyps have more risk for high grade dysplasia. Acta Med Iran. 2013;51(3):172-77.
23.
Tony J, Harish K, Ramachandran TM, Sunilkumar K, Thomas V. Profile of colonic polyps in a southern Indian population. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2007;26(3):127-29.
24.
Zhan T, Hahn F, Hielscher T, Betge J, Kähler G, Ebert MP, et al. Frequent co- occurrence of high-grade dysplasia in large flat colonic polyps (>20 mm) and synchronous polyps. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15:82.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/.18142

Date of Submission: Sep 29, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Nov 19, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jan 03, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 30, 2022
• Manual Googling: Nov 15, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Dec 23, 2022 (18%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com