Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 156473

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2023 | Month : May | Volume : 17 | Issue : 5 | Page : ZD13 - ZD15 Full Version

Imaging Implications in Plunging Ranula- A Rare Case Report


Published: May 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63229.17953
Sushmitha Sudharsan, Sankara Aravind Warrier, Vaishnavi Muthukumaran

1. Lecturer, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Postgraduate, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Vaishnavi Muthukumaran,
1, Mount Poonamallee Road, Sri Ramachandra Nagar, Ramachandra Nager, Chennai-600116, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: d0720002@sriher.edu.in

Abstract

Plunging ranula is an intraoral swelling plunging deep into neck and extending beyond the floor of the mouth. Clinical diagnosis is challenging to the clinician as, they mimic other neck lesions like reactive lymphadenopathy, cystic hygroma, thyroglossal duct cyst, abscess and so on. Herein, the authors present a case of a 34-year-old male with history of swollen neck for past three months reported to the outpatient ward. On examination apart from the extraoral swelling in the left side of the neck, there was also an evidence of dome-shaped fluctuant deep seated swelling in the floor of the mouth. Biochemical analysis of the patient was within the normal limits. Further two-dimensional (2D) radiographs findings also, were non contributory. An anechoic presentation indicating fluid-filled sac was evident on ultrasound imaging. Sialogram of the case revealed the classic tail sign indicating a defect beyond the mylohyoid muscle; thus, three-dimensional (3D) imaging paves the way for deriving a final diagnosis. Furthermore, patient has been enlightened about the available treatment options and is under regular follow-up. Adding as a novelty, the present case is discussed with complete clinical, videographic and radiographic presentation of plunging ranula.

Keywords

Cystic lesion, Magnetic resonance imaging, Salivary gland, Sialogram, Ultrasonography

Case Report

A 34-year-old male reported to the Department of Oral Medicine with discomfort due to a swelling on the left side of the neck for a period of three months. The swelling was gradually progressive in onset with no other associated symptom of pain. His past medical and dental history were non contributory. Extraoral inspection of the left submandibular region revealed a diffuse swelling roughly measuring of size 3×5 centimetres (cm), extending from the left angle of mandible to the submental region without crossing the midline, round to oval in shape with no other surface changes (Table/Fig 1). On palpation, the swelling was soft, compressible and non tender. Intraoral examination revealed a well-circumscribed dome-shaped fluctuant swelling around 5×5 cm approximately (Table/Fig 2). Medially, the swelling extended to the midline of the left side of the floor of the mouth and laterally to the lingual vestibule. Anteroposteriorly, the swelling was limited unilaterally to an imaginary line drawn from the lower left canine to the left first molar, respectively. Bidigital palpation of the swelling was soft, compressible but not reducible and fluctuant. This confirmed that the swelling was deep seated herniating through the mylohyoid muscle [Video-1]. Based on the history and clinical examination, a provisional diagnosis of plunging ranula was considered. In the differential diagnosis, dentoalveolar abscess leading to space infection was considered, due to the presence of root stump in relation to 37 tooth number. Secondly, benign salivary gland pathology was added upon due the site-specific clinical presentation.

Complete blood picture and the thyroid profile were within normal bounds. Mandibular left lateral occlusal radiograph revealed a root stump in relation to 37 tooth number (Table/Fig 3). Ultrasonography (USG) of the swelling revealed an anechoic, bilobed fluid collection in the left submandibular area with a superficial and deep component extended along the fascial plane features confirming the diagnosis (Table/Fig 4)a-c. Magnetic Resonance (MR) sialogram with Computed Tomography (CT) screening revealed a dilated left submandibular duct in the floor of the mouth and thickened defect of the mylohyoid muscle with sublingual gland herniation, depicting the pathognomic “Tail sign”. Interpretation revealed case of plunging ranula that extends posteriorly to the left submandibular space (Table/Fig 5)a,b. The patient is under regular follow-up and has been planned for surgical management.

Surgical management is the major treatment modality in a case of plunging ranula. Patient has been enlightened about the planned procedure and favourable treatment outcomes. His concerns regarding the postsurgical aesthetic compliance were cleared by the team. Patient was symptomatically managed with antibiotic and analgesics. Owing to his financial status a time lap was given for further discussion with family members to revert back. Patient is under regular follow-up.

Discussion

A unilateral cystic swelling on the floor of the mouth is a common presentation of ranula (1),(2). “Ranula” a Latin word “rana,” means “frog” due to its representation as a transparent underbelly of frog (3). The penetration of mucous fluid pressure through the mylohyoid muscle filling the submandibular depicts the ‘plunging ranula’ (4). Oral sialocysts make up 6% of all cases of ranula, occurring in 0.2% out of every 1000 people whereas, true retention cysts accounts to only 1% to 10% [4,5]. Children and young adults are more likely to have ranulas than older adults with the cervical variant peaking in their third decade (4).

Various aetiological factors are (6):

• Anatomic discrepancy of the sublingual gland;
• Congenital malformation of the gland;
• Genetic susceptibility of the patient;
• Trauma tot;
• Iatrogenic surgical injury;
• Sadomasochistic habit (e.g., whistling by inserting finger under the tongue).

Clinically, they manifest as a slow-growing, usually unilateral, pliable, painless mass in the floor of the mouth are habitual presentation (5). The size is usually >2 cm, appearing as a blue-tinged, tense, fluctuant dome-shaped vesicle. The pressure in the fluid causes the swelling to rupture, dissecting through the mylohyoid muscle into the submandibular or submental space forming a plunging or diving ranula (3). About 45% of patients present with an intraoral swelling as their first symptom, while 34% present with as plunging ranulas (3).

The 2D ultrasonographic imaging technique is predominantly being carried out to study soft tissue pathologies as it is highly sensitive in detecting a relatively small volume of the fluid, non invasive, non ionic and cost effective. The mylohyoid muscle defect is an occasional presentation apart from being a cystic lesion. The largest number of this defect occurs at the junction of the anterior and middle third where the submental vessels travel. The anterior and posterior fibres of the mylohyoid are said to overlap slightly on one other, perhaps culminating to a potential area of dehiscence. This resulting defect is been called as ‘boutonnière’ and the herniating salivary gland is called the ‘bouton’ (5). A simple and direct radiographic approach was introduced by Takimoto T in preoperative identification of 14plunging ranulas. This method was done through injecting contrast media into the sublingual region smoothly displacing the glandular ducts surrounding the mass (7). Jain P, studied the presence of the classic tail sign with USG in 126 plunging ranula cases. A total of 13 patients (10.3%) showed sublingual space fluid, most showed fluid extension through a mylohyoid dehiscence, 2 patients (1.6%) showed fluid within the posterior sublingual space fluid, and only one patient in his entire study revealed all of the components of the characteristically described tail sign (8).

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a valuable tool in assessing the deeper tissue layers which cannot be detected by conventional sonography. Plunging ranulas are frequently characterised by homogenous cystic formations surrounding the sublingual area in the submandibular or parapharyngeal region (5). MR sialography a non invasive method that characterises the ductal structure of the salivary gland, providing an excellent alternative to conventional sialography. A high resolution Fat-suppressed T2-weighted (FS-T2W) or Fast Spin Echo T2-weighted (FSE-T2W) sequence with surface coil or multichannel head coil are usually performed. It is limited by the acquisition time required for a single sequence and susceptibility to motion. The accuracy of MR sialography in detecting obstructions, stenosis and stricture of the ducts are similar to the conventional sialography. Ranulas appear characteristically on MR imaging due to their high water content. As a result, it has a significant T2-weighted signal intensity and a low T1-weighted proton density that may resemble a lymphatic malformation, especially in a plunging ranula (9). Tanaka T et al., studied the sublingual gland duct visualisation using MR sialography in seven patients with sublingual salivary gland diseases. In one patient with a ranula, the lesion could be correctly diagnosed as a ranula by MR sialography because the mass was clearly derived from sublingual gland ducts (10). A CT scan is useful in guiding the surgeon for soft-tissue planes and spaces involved in the neck region. Ranulas typically have an oval form with a homogeneous core attenuation area that ranges from 10 to 20 Hounsfield Unit (HU). The detailed mapping provided by the CT scan assists in planning approach for the excision and thus, minimising recurrence (3),(9).

Differential diagnosis of dentoalveolar abscess leading to space infection was overruled by radiographic diagnosis whereas, benign salivary gland pathology was ruled out on ultrasound and 3D MRI. Other differentials of cervical ranula may include soft tissue swellings of the neck such as infectious cervical lymphadenopathy (tuberculosis, Epstein-Barr virus, cat scratch disease,) submandibular sialadenitis, cystic or neoplastic thyroid disease, branchial cleft cyst, cystic hygroma, lipoma, laryngocele, intramuscular haemangioma and dermoid cyst. Cervical ranula have high frequency of recurrence, if not completely resected, as they have the tendency to dissect through the midline (3),(11).

Conclusion

The diagnostic imaging modalities of plain radiographs, sialography, and ultrasound are adequate in differentiating ranulas among various entities. However, the surgical need for delineating the extent of any cystic swelling necessitates the 3D imaging approach. Similarly, in the present case, along with baseline radiological imaging of occlusal radiograph and ultrasonogram, MR sialogram with CT screening was executed to prove the clinical diagnosis and for a proper surgical planning. An elaborate patient history, clinical examination, USG, MRI or CT imaging, and fluid aspiration plays a pivotal role for the clinician to successfully attain an early prompt diagnosis.

References

1.
Olojede ACO, Ogundana OM, Emeka CI, Adewole RA, Emmanuel MM, Gbotolorun OM, et al. Plunging ranula: Surgical management of case series and the literature review. Clin Case Rep. 2017;6(1):109-14. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Gupta A, Karjodkar FR. Plunging Ranula: A case report. ISRN Dentistry. 2011;2011:806928.[crossref][PubMed]
3.
Dhingra R, Davessar J, Pushkal, Vignesh AK, Sharma S. Plunging ranula in 26 years old male: a case report. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;6:1009-12. [crossref]
4.
Ayers E. Plunging ranula: A case report. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography. 2018;34(3):875647931876763. [crossref]
5.
Jain P, Jain R, Morton RP, Ahmad Z. Plunging ranulas: High-resolution ultrasound for diagnosis and surgical management. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(6):1442-49. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Bishen KA, Singh A, Limaye M, Mishra K. Bilateral plunging ranula due to habitual etiology. J Oral Health Comm Dent. 2017;11(1):19-22. [crossref]
7.
Takimoto T. Radiographic technique for preoperative diagnosis of plunging ranula. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1991;49(6):659. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Jain P. Plunging Ranulas and prevalence of the “Tail Sign” in 126 consecutive cases. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2019;39(2):273-78. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Ugga L, Ravanelli M, Pallottino AA, Farina D, Maroldi R. Diagnostic work-up in obstructive and inflammatory salivary gland disorders. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2017;37(2):83-93. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Tanaka T, Oda M, Wakasugi-Sato N, Joujima T, Miyamura Y, Habu M, et al. First report of sublingual gland ducts: Visualization by dynamic mr sialography and its clinical application. J Clin Med. 2020;9(11):3676. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Charnoff SK, Carter BL. Plunging ranula: CT diagnosis. Radiology. 1986;158(2):467-68.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63229.17953

Date of Submission: Feb 03, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Feb 21, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Mar 11, 2023
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 13, 2023
• Manual Googling: Feb 25, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Mar 10, 2023 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com