Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 151300

AbstractMaterial and MethodsReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Research Protocol
Year : 2023 | Month : May | Volume : 17 | Issue : 5 | Page : YK01 - YK04 Full Version

Effect of Aerobika Device versus Acapella Device on Sputum Volume and Lung Functions in Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Patients- A Research Protocol


Published: May 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/58056.17769
Vishakha Tayade, Vishnu Vardhan

1. Resident, Department of Cardio-Respiratory Physiotherapy, Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Cardio-Respiratory Physiotherapy, Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Vishnu Vardhan,
Professor and Head, Department of Cardio-Respiratory Physiotherapy, Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha-442107, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: vishnudiwakarpt@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (COPD) is an incurable, gradually worsening respiratory condition characterised by airflow limitation and blockage that cannot be completely reversed. Productive cough caused due to mucus hypersecretion is a common symptom of COPD. Clearing the lungs may aid in the conservation of energy and oxygen, as well as the prevention of lung infections. Therefore, Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) devices are designed to aid in sputum clearing in COPD patients. They are available in a variety of sizes and shapes and clear the airway with air pressure, oscillation, or high-frequency sound waves.

Need of the study: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) makes it challenging for air to flow freely into and out of the lungs. Shortness of breath, cough, and mucus in the lungs are all possible symptoms. Clearing the lungs may aid in the conservation of energy and oxygen, as well as the prevention of lung infections. To help clear away excess sputum, numerous airway clearance devices can be used. They are available in a variety of sizes and shapes and clear the airway with air pressure, oscillation, or high-frequency sound waves.

Aim: To compare the effect of Aerobika vs. Acaplla device on sputum volume and lung function in COPD patients.

Materials and Methods: A comparative study will be performed in respiratory medicine OPD of Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha. Ethical approval was received from the Ethical Review Committee of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Deemed to be University. In this study 30 patients diagnosed with COPD will be categorised into two groups one group will receive aerobika device with conventional physiotherapy and another group will receive acapella device with conventional physiotherapy twice a day. Treatment will be given five days for one week. The assessment will be done on day one of the treatment and at the end of treatment which is first week. Sputum volume and lung function will be assessed by sputum collector and Pulmonary Function Test (PFT), respectively. The statistical analysis will be done using chi-square test. The parameters will be compared between both the groups for sputum volume and lung function over a period of one week. Data will be analysed in a statistical software SPSS 27.0.V.

Keywords

Acute exacerbation, COPD assessment test scale, Oscillating positive expiratory pressure device, Pulmonary function test

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, ranking sixth out of the top 30 causes of mortality in 2015 and projected to rise to third place (8.6%) in 2030, in accordance to the International Global Burden of Disease Study, In the next years, prevalence is expected to increase rather than a decline (1). It is currently the world’s fourth-biggest cause of death, after stroke, myocardial infarction disease, and acute respiratory infections. Three million persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease died in 2016 (2),(3). Uncontrollable dyspnoea, diminished functional capacity, periods of acute exacerbation, airway restriction, and blockage that cannot be entirely reversed are all symptoms of COPD (4),(5). COPD episodes are prevalent, resulting in a decline in health. Exacerbations are typically diagnosed when specific symptoms worsen or lung functions deteriorate (5),(6).

Addressing concerns linked to minimising work of ventilation, enhancing clearing of the airways, enhancing mobility, and assisting with rehabilitation services are all part of physiotherapy’s role in the management of COPD. Physiotherapy should be adapted to fulfill varied needs depending on if patients are in an acute exacerbation of COPD or a stable phase of the disease. The main objectives of pulmonary compete are to alleviate ailments, enhance the quality of life, and boost physical and emotional engagement in daily activities.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease makes it challenging for air to flow freely into and out of the lungs (7),(8),(9). Shortness of breath, cough, and mucus in the lungs are all possible symptoms. Clearing the lungs may aid in the conservation of energy and oxygen, as well as the prevention of lung infections. To help clear away excess sputum, numerous airway clearance devices can be used. They come in a variety of shapes and sizes (mouthpieces, masks, vests, etc.,) and clear the airway with air pressure, oscillation, or high-frequency sound waves (10),(11). The Aerobika device and Acapella device use airway oscillations to thin mucus to aid sputum clearance. They are less likely to have side effects than pharmaceutical treatments. These devices not only aid in the clearing of mucus in patients with stable COPD, but also enhance lung capacity, exercise ability, and standards of living (12),(13),(14).

The Aerobika device is a drug-free OPEP device that has been demonstrated to effectively evacuate sputum and open airways in COPD patients (12). The Acapella is a small portable device that is used to clear the airway. It has both resistive and vibratory properties that aid in the loosening and clearing of secretions in the chest (15). Acapella, according to the producers, may be a better option as it is self-executed and can be utilised in every postural drainage position, requires less therapist time, and is appropriate for patients with a variety of lung functions. The Acapella is a modern gadget with an oscillating component that causes airway vibrations in addition to providing positive pressure. These vibrations may assist remove secretions from the airway walls in addition to the Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEP) mask. Mucous viscoelasticity can be reduced by airway oscillation. In this study, we will try to find out which is more beneficial for clearing secretions and improving lung function in COPD patients. The aim of the study is to compare the effect of Aerobika device and Acapella device between the age group of 40-70 years.

Research Hypothesis

Null hypothesis:

• There will be no significant difference between Aerobika and Acapella device on sputum volume and lung function in COPD patients.

Alternate hypothesis:

• There will be significant difference between Aerobika and Acapella device on sputum volume and lung function in COPD patients.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

The study will be conducted to see the effect of aerobika device versus acapella device on sputum volume and lung functions in COPD patients. The Aerobika device can help to open the blocked or collapsed airways, as well as loosen mucus so it can flow to the larger airways of the lungs and be coughed out. The Acapella device clears mucus from the airways by using vibrations and positive pressure or resistance. When the patient will breathe out, it vibrates to remove mucus from the airway walls, allowing the airways to stay open for longer. This makes it possible for mucus to migrate up the airways. As the airways open, vibrations help thin and eliminate mucus, allowing it to be expelled. A study done by Burudpakdee C et al., the Aerobika device was shown to decrease the frequency of exacerbations in COPD patients in documented real-world evidence research (16). The proposed device was linked to reduce in the severity of exacerbations, as well as a decrease in the rates of rehospitalisation and Emergency Room (ER) visits (16). A study done by Khourdigian-Sinani S et al., on the Aerobika OPEP device’s cost-effectiveness for the treatment of COPD exacerbations and concluded that the Aerobika OPEP device should be considered as a potential aspect of a therapy plan for COPD patients in order to enhance symptom control and minimise their incidence of exacerbations (17). A decrease in hospitalisation and re-hospitalisation episodes could have a considerable influence on COPD’s huge financial burden [17,18]. In a study done by Leemans G et al., on approaching the effect of an OPEP device in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using functional respiratory imaging and concluded that utilising an Aerobika device improves airflow, which improves Internal Airflow Distribution (IAD) and affects the deposition of concomitant medications in the body in COPD patients (19). Another study done by Shamakh M et al., on comparison of the effects of acapella versus hand-held PEP on pulmonary functioning in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disorders concluded that PEP and Acapella improved respiratory functioning in mild COPD. Compared to Acapella and PEP, benefits from ACBT alone were less significant (20).

Material and Methods

Material Required

1. Aerobika device
2. Acapella device
3. Sputum collector
4. Mask

Methodology

Ethical approval

This comparative study will be conducted in Wardha’s Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital’s Department of Respiratory Medicine from January 2023 to June 2023. After receiving ethical approval from the Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Research’s Institutional Ethical Committee, the proposal for this comparative study was ethically approved by Departmental Research Committee, Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College on 11th May, 2022 with reference number DMIMS(DU)/IEC/2022/900. It was registered in the Clinical Trial Registry-India (CTRI) with the registration number CTRI/2022/06/043311. An informed consent will be filled by participants. The participants will be assigned and allocated in two experimental groups, Group A receiving a 1-week programme with Aerobika device and Group B receiving a 1-week programme with Acapella device.

Study design and sample size: Before inclusion, all the participants will be informed regarding the aim and procedure of research. Those participants who will meet the inclusion criteria will be give the written informed consent. In comparative study, those participants diagnosed with COPD will be enrolled for one week protocol.

The sample size was calculated by the biostatistician of the institute using Cochran formula (21).

n=Za/22.P.(1-P)/ d2

Where, Za/22 is the level of significance at 5% i.e., 95%
Confidence interval=1.96
P=Overall rate of COPD=3.8%=0.038 (21)
d=Desired error of margin=4%=0.04

N=N=1.962×0.038×(1-0.038)/ (0.04)2
=28.65
=30

Participants
I
nclusion criteria: Haemodynamically stable, conscious and oriented both male and female participants of age group between 40 to 70 years diagnosed with COPD and who will sign the written informed consent will be included in the study.
E
xclusion criteria: The participants with breathlessness with grade 4 and grade 5. Participants with other cardiorespiratory, neurological, infective pulmonary conditions, rib fractures, chest trauma and thoracic vertebral fracture will be excluded from the study.
R
ecruitment procedure: Patients who came to the respiratory medicine OPD at the Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital in Sawangi, Wardha. Diagnosed with COPD with the age group of 40-70 years. The patients suffering from restrictive lung disease, rib fractures, chest trauma and thoracic vertebral fracture will be excluded.
Procedure
Participant timeline: The conventional physiotherapy will comprise of pursed-lip breathing, diaphragmatic breathing, thoracic expansion, active limb mobility exercises, early ambulation and improved functional capacity. Along with conventional physiotherapy, acapella and aerobika devices will be given five days for one week twice a day to Group A and Group B, respectively. Each patient will be required to complete one week of rehabilitation after enrolment in the study. The screening will be done at baseline on the first day and then at the end of first week.
Implementation
The outcome of the study result can be implemented in clinical practice for the given condition as an evidence-based practice.
Dependent variable: sputum volume and PFT

Independent variable:

• Acapella: Materials and Methods 22 Specifications-PORTEX Acapella DH Vibratory PEP Therapy System with Mouth Piece Green Product Dimensions: 18 cm×7 cm×7 cm
• Aerobika: Lupin Aerobika OPEP Device (1 pcs)
Dimensions: 15 (cm)×5 (cm)×20 (cm)

Study Procedure

Assessment of the patient will be started after approval from the concerned authority individuals are first screened as per the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the individuals fulfilling the criteria will then explain the purpose of the study.

Group A: Aerobika Device

• The patient will be taken in the high sitting positions. Patients will be taught how to put the mouthpiece and seal their lips around it during the initial training session.
• The patient will take a deep breath and hold it for 2 to 3 seconds before actively but gently expelling through the device. Exhalation should last three to four times as long as inhalation. Cheeks should be firm and flat.
• Continue to inhale deeply and long exhalation for 10 to 20 breaths followed by 2 to 3 huffs- cough for clearing the airways.
• Along with the above-mentioned treatment, conventional physiotherapy will also be given five days for one week twice a day for 15 to 20 minutes which will comprise of pursed-lip breathing, diaphragmatic breathing, thoracic expansion, active limb mobility exercises, focused treatment on early ambulation and improved functional capacity.

Group B: Acapella Device

• The patient will be in high-seated; Patients will be instructed to exhale via the device with the resistance dial set to the lowest level for 3 to 4 seconds during the initial training session.
• Patients will be advised to exhale more or less strongly if their exhalation will either slow or just too fast
• If a patient’s expiration is too sluggish or excessively quick, they will be told to exhale more or less forcefully. Breathing control, 10 breaths using the Acapella device inhaling to three-quarter maximum breathing capacity, 2-3 seconds breath-hold, active exhalation to functional residual capacity, cough or forced expiration (huff) in a predefined cycle are all part of the Acapella treatment.
• Conventional physiotherapy, which will include pursed-lip breathing, diaphragmatic breathing, thoracic expansion, active limb mobility exercises, focused treatment on early ambulation, and enhanced functional ability, will be given five days for 15 to 20 minutes for one week twice a day, in addition to the above-mentioned treatment.

Outcome Measures

Primary outcomes measures:

1. Sputum volume (mL): It has been evaluated in airway clearance techniques using alternative means such as sputum wet weight, dry weight, and volume collected at baseline on the first day and then at the end of 1st week.

2. Pulmonary Functions Test (PFT): The test assesses lung volume, capacity, rates of flow, and gas exchange.

• Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
• Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1)
• FEV1/FVC

Secondary Outcomes Measures

COPD assessment test (CAT) scale: The CAT was developed in order to have a short and easy tool which could be administered in the clinical setting (22). It is a validated tool measuring and quantifying the impact or burden of COPD on the individual (23). The scoring of CAT is from 0 to 40. Higher scores denote a more severe impact of COPD on a patient’s life.

Data Collection and Management

Data of the study will be stored in a safe, secured storeroom with limited access for later review by a biostatistician, a researcher in charge.

Statistical Analysis

Data will be analysed in a statistical software SPSS 27.0.V. The statistical analysis will be done using Chi-square test. The parameters will be compared between both the groups for sputum volume and lung function over a period of one week. A p-value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

Ethical Approval and Dissemination

The patients who participate in the study and the DMIMSU, which will finance it, will be able to access the study’s findings. Data will be stored in the DMIMSU storage device after the study is completed and the results are published.

Patient Consent

Principal Investigators will get the participant’s written informed consent on a printed form (in their native language) with signatures and provide verification of confidentiality.

Confidentiality

The patients will be informed about the study protocol, and the primary investigator will collect subjective data. The confidentiality declaration, as well as the signatures of the principal investigator, the patient, and a witness, will be included on the consent form. If the patient’s consent is required to share some information for the study, he/she will be given total assurance of his privacy.

Funding

Any public or commercial organisations will not provide direct financing for this project.

References

1.
Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global burden of disease study. The Lancet. 1997;349:1269-76. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Boutou AK. Physical inactivity and sedentarism among COPD patients: What about dynamic hyperinflation? COPD J Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2019;16:108-08. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Tashkin DP. Heroin smoking and COPD. Chest. 2019;155:247-48. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Gómez FP, Rodriguez-Roisin R. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2002;8:81-86. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Miravitlles M. Effect of exacerbations on quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A 2 year follow up study. Thorax. 2004;59:387- 95. 10.1136/thx.2003.008730. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Anthonisen NR. Antibiotic therapy in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Intern Med. 1987;106:196. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Omachi TA, Blanc PD, Claman DM, Chen H, Yelin EH, Julian L, et al. Disturbed sleep among COPD patients is longitudinally associated with mortality and adverse COPD outcomes. Sleep Med. 2012;13:476-83. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Zwerink M, Brusse-Keizer M, van der Valk PD, Zielhuis GA, Monninkhof EM, van der Palen J, et al. Self management for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(3):CD002990. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Hopkinson NS, Dayer MJ, Moxham J, Polkey MI. Abdominal muscle fatigue following exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Res. 2010;11:15. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Hopkinson NS, Sharshar T, Ross ET, Nickol AH, Dayer MJ, Porcher R, et al. Corticospinal control of respiratory muscles in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2004;141:01-12. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
van der Schans CP, Postma DS, Koëter GH, Rubin BK. Physiotherapy and bronchial mucus transport. Eur Respir J. 1999;13:1477-86. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Svenningsen S, Paulin GA, Sheikh K, Guo F, Hasany A, Kirby M, et al. Oscillatory positive expiratory pressure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. COPD J Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2016;13:66-74. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Bourbeau J, McIvor RA, Devlin HM, Kaplan A. Oscillating positive expiratory pressure (OPEP) device therapy in Canadian respiratory disease management: Review, care gaps and suggestion for use. Can J Respir Crit Care Sleep Med. 2019;3:233-40. [crossref]
14.
Wolkove N, Kamel H, Rotaple M, Baltzan MA. Use of a mucus clearance device enhances the bronchodilator response in patients with stable COPD. Chest. 2002;121:702-07. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Volsko TA, DiFiore J, Chatburn RL. Performance comparison of two oscillating positive expiratory pressure devices: Acapella versus Flutter. Respir Care. 2003;48:124-30.
16.
Burudpakdee C, Seetasith A, Dunne P, Kauffman G, Carlin B, Coppolo D, et al. A real-world study of 30-day exacerbation outcomes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients managed with aerobika OPEP. Pulm Ther. 2017;3:163-71. [crossref]
17.
Khoudigian-Sinani S, Kowal S, Suggett JA, Coppolo DP. Cost-effectiveness of the Aerobika* oscillating positive expiratory pressure device in the management of COPD exacerbations. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017;12:3065-73. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Wedzicha JA Ers Co-Chair, Miravitlles M, Hurst JR, Calverley PM, Albert RK, Anzueto A, et al. Management of COPD exacerbations: A European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society guideline. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(3):1600791. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Leemans G, Belmans D, Van Holsbeke C, Kushnarev V, Sugget J, Ides K, et al. A functional respiratory imaging approach to the effect of an oscillating positive expiratory pressure device in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020;15:1261-68. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Shamakh M, Badr N, El-Batanouny M, Shendy M. Acapella versus hand-held positive expiratory pressure on pulmonary functions in management of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. J Adv Pharm Educ Res. 2020;10:27-34.
21.
Regional COPD Working Group: COPD prevalence in 12 Asia-Pacific countries and regions: Projections based on the COPD prevalence estimation model. Respirology. 2003;8:192-98. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Putcha N, Puhan MA, Drummond MB, Han MK, Regan EA, Hanania NA, et al. A simplified score to quantify comorbidity in COPD. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12):e114438. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Jones PW, Brusselle G, Dal Negro RW, Ferrer M, Kardos P, Levy ML, et al. Properties of the COPD assessment test in a cross-sectional European study. Eur Respir J. 2011;38:29-35.[crossref][PubMed]

Tables and Figures
[Table / Fig - 1]
DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/58056.17769

Date of Submission: May 27, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Aug 27, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Nov 26, 2022
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 20, 2022
• Manual Googling: Oct 08, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Nov 22, 2022 (16%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com