Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 71690

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : May | Volume : 17 | Issue : 5 | Page : TC10 - TC15 Full Version

MRI Evaluation of Cervical Spondylotic Canal Stenosis and Change in its Severity on Flexion and Extension Positioning: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: May 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/59421.17855
Divya Vishwanatha Kini, TR Kapilamoorthy, Rudresh Hiremath, Anupama Chandrappa, Sachin P Shetty, Balasubramanian Gurumurthy

1. Senior Resident, Department of Radiology, JSS Medical College, Mysore, Karnataka, India. 2. Professor, Department of Radiology, JSS Medical College, Mysore, Karnataka, India. 3. Professor, Department of Radiology, JSS Medical College, Mysore, Karnataka, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, JSS Medical College, Mysore, Karnataka, India. 5. Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, JSS Medical College, Mysore, Karnataka, India. 6. Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, JSS Medical College, Mysore, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Divya Vishwanatha Kini,
119, Mahamaya Krupa, 12th Cross, 4th Main, Jayanagar, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: drkinidivya@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Cervical spondylosis is a degenerative disorder of the cervical spine and has varied pathological forms of presentation. It presents as either varying degrees of intervertebral disc bulge, spinal cord compression, altered cord signals, neural exit foraminal stenosis, annular tears, facet joint degeneration and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy in combination or isolation. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) being known for its excellent soft tissue resolution helps assess and grade these pathologies efficiently.

Aim: To evaluate the flexion-extension MRI in regular cervical spondylosis imaging by assessing the effect of flexion and extension positioning on the severity of cervical spondylotic canal stenosis and spinal canal dimensions. Also, to compare the change in cervical canal dimensions on flexion and extension with that of neutral positioning.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Radiodiagnosis, JSS Medical College, Mysuru, Karnataka, India, from January 2021-June 2022. A total of 50 participants, aged above 18 years with a clinical suspicion of cervical spondylosis and without history of trauma, tumour, infection, prior cervical surgery and with Nurick grade <3 were included in the present study. In all the subjects, spinal canal dimension, degree of stenosis was assessed and graded, further assessment for presence of foraminal stenosis, ligamentum flavum hypertrophy and facetal arthropathy were also documented. Data were statistically analysed using Chi-square test and Mc Nemer’s test.

Results: Out of total 50 cases, 26 (52%) were males and the rest were females with mean age of 46 years. Least cervical canal space dimension of 0.4 cm at C6-7 level in the neutral position and at C3-4, C5-6 and C6-7 levels in extension were noted thus, proving the importance of extension positioning in recognising maximum levels and severity of involvement. Narrowest diameter was demonstrated on flexion and extension. Additionally, the elderly were seen more affected by central disc bulge, foraminal stenosis, facetal arthropathy and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy as compared to the middle aged and the younger patients, more so in extension (12%).

Conclusion: Disc bulge and grade of stenosis vary extensively and are more conspicuous on additional flexion and extension imaging. Severity of the grade of stenosis and demonstration of maximum number of levels involved on extension as compared to flexion or neutral positioning thereby, benefitting clinical management plan.

Keywords

Cervical spine, Disc bulge, Magnetic resonance imaging, Spinal canal

Cervical spondylosis is a degenerative disorder of the cervical spine and its presence has been noted in 85% individuals, above the age of 60 years with one cervical level being the least involved (1). It presents as either varying degrees of intervertebral disc bulge, spinal cord compression, altered cord signals, neural exit foraminal stenosis, annular tears, facet joint degeneration and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy in combination or isolation (2). Elderly individuals are most predisposed to such changes (2). Clinical presentation and disability levels of affected individuals are varied. Patients present with a varied grade of disability which has been graded by Nurick into six grades (0-5) (3).

Cervical spine is known to have the greatest mobility in the sagittal plane when compared to the rest of the spinal column and hence, more predisposed to the effects of spondylosis (4). Day-to-day activities involve a varied range of motion in the cervical spine thus, demanding the need for a more dynamic imaging protocol to evaluate the pathology than a static conventional MRI in supine neutral posture. Flexion-extension MRI helps demonstrate previously missed pathologies, accurate identification of levels involved in spondylosis and identify the true nature of the pathology (4).

Zeitoun D et al., have proven the stage of stenosis in extension to be significantly higher when compared to neutral and flexion MRI (5). Another comparative study by Lee SY et al., has also shown that spinal stenosis, disc abnormality and nerve root compression was much accurately diagnosed with a 3-position MRI technique (6). Thus, a better presurgical radiological evaluation will help in a better surgical outcome. Additional findings in the form of intramedullary high signal intensities were also noted as per Yukawa Y et al., (7). In the current Indian scenario, flexion-extension MRI is not routinely practiced as a part of the cervical spondylosis imaging protocol and the study regarding the same are scarce in India. The inclusion of the same is therefore imperative, as analysing the cervical spine with the new additional positional modifications helps in detailed and a more effective assessment of the cervical spine as demonstrated in the present study.

Thus, the present study aims to evaluate the flexion-extension MRI in regular cervical spondylosis imaging by assessing the effect of flexion and extension positioning on the severity of cervical spondylotic canal stenosis and spinal canal dimensions. Also, to compare the change in cervical canal dimensions on flexion and extension with that of neutral positioning.

Material and Methods

Present cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Radiodiagnosis at JSS Medical College, Mysuru, Karnataka, India. Duration of the study was, from January 2021- June 2022. This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee’s (reference number-JSS/MC/PG5189/2019-20 dated on 14.11.2019).

Inclusion criteria: All patients above the age of 18 years, who were referred with a clinical diagnosis of cervical spondylosis and presenting with complaints of neck pain with/without neurogenic symptoms of Nurick grade 0, 1, 2 was included (3).

Exclusion criteria: Patients with history of trauma, tumour, infection, prior cervical surgery and with Nurick grade >3 were excluded.
As per the Nurick grading,

Grade 0: Signs or symptoms of root involvement but without evidence of spinal cord disease;

Grade 1: Signs of spinal cord disease but no difficulty in walking;

Grade 2: Slight difficulty in walking which did not prevent full-time employment;

Grade 3: Difficulty in walking which prevented full-time employment or the ability to do all housework, but which was not so severe as to require someone else’s help to walk;

Grade 4: Able to walk only with someone else’s help or with the aid of a frame;

Grade 5: Chairbound or bedridden (3).

Sample size calculation: It was based on the study by Jha SC et al., (8).

Sample size was obtained by the formula-(Zα+Zβ)2×S2×2/ D1

Where Zα-Z value for α level (1.96 for an α error of 0.05)
Zβ-Z value for β level (1.28 for an β error of 0.10)
S-Standard deviation
D-Clinically meaningful difference between the two groups.

i.e., (1.96+1.28)2×(0.19)2×2/ (0.15)2 =33.68~34

However, study was conducted on 50 patients referred for MRI cervical spine in view of clinically diagnosed cervical spondylosis.

Study Procedure

Patients were selected, relevant clinical history obtained and further subjected to MR imaging. MRI was performed using a 3.0 Tesla MRI Scanner (PHILIPS INGENIA 3.0 Tesla MRI Scanner) with the use of a 32-channel receive-only head and neck coil. Images were acquired using standard scanning protocols. The scanning protocol included 2D sagittal T1, T2, Short Tau Inversion Recovery (STIR), axial T2 and coronal STIR sequences in the neutral position and additional 2D T2 sagittal and axial sequences in both flexion and extension positioning. The acquired images were transferred to a dedicated workstation (Philips, Ingenuity workstation) for post-processing. Using a Region Of Interest (ROI) based approach spinal canal diameters were measured and graded (8). Assessment for cord compression and signal changes, foraminal stenosis, ligamentum flavum hypertrophy and facet joint arthropathy at all subaxial levels in the cervical spine in neutral, flexion and extension positions was done. The parameters were assessed as follows:

Cervical spinal canal diameter: was measured as mentioned earlier (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 2). This was further graded into grade 0-3 i.e., grade 0: refers to the absence of central canal stenosis; grade 1 refers to nearly complete obliteration of subarachnoid space, including obliteration of the arbitrary subarachnoid space exceeding 50%, without signs of cord deformity; grade 2 refers to central canal stenosis with cord deformity but without spinal cord signal change; grade 3 refers to the presence of spinal 11cord signal change near the compressed level on T2-weighted images (9).
Cord compression: was determined by the presence of disc bulge and resultant canal stenosis compression on the cord causing change in contour on both sagittal and axial planes. Assessment was also made in comparison to the outline of the cord above and below the level of compression. In association, the presence of cord compression was associated with intrinsic signal change imaged as T2/Fluid-attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) hyperintensity within the involved cord segment.
Foraminal stenosis: was assessed by the presence of disc bulge resulting in narrowing of the neural foramina corroborated on axial and sagittal planes. This was evidenced by the presence of effacement/loss of fat in the perineural region of the foramina and by indentation/impingement of the cord with resultant change in morphology (10).
Ligament flavum hypertrophy: was considered when the thickness of the same was measured bilaterally and found to be more than or equal to 2 mm (11).
Facet joint arthropathy: was imaged as presence of reduced facetal joint space, articular surface irregularity, osteophytes and hypertrophy (12).

The patients were further divided into age groups of 20-35 years (group 1), 36-50 years (group 2) and above 50 (group-3) and above described pathologies assessed.

Statistical Analysis

Data was entered in the Microsoft Excel sheet and statistical analysis was done using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Statistics version 20.0 (IBM corp. released 2011). Data was subjected to normalcy test (Shapiro-wilk test). Data showed non normal distribution. Hence, nonparametric tests (Wilcoxon signed test) were applied. Further, Chi-square test and Mc Nemer’s test was computed for qualitative variables.

Results

A total of 50 patients were assessed. Each patient was subjected to flexion, extension and neutral positioning and the subaxial cervical spinal levels were assessed i.e., C2-3, C3-4, C4-5, C5-6 and C6-7 intervertebral discs summing upto 250 levels in total. In present study, 26 (52%) cases were males and the rest were females. Least cervical canal space dimension of 0.4 cm at C6-7 level in the neutral position and at C3-4, C5-6 and C6-7 levels in extension were noted 26 (52%) cases were males and the rest were females. Patients ranged from the ages of 23 to 73 with an average of 46±13.02 years.

13 (26%) patients belonged to group 1, 20 (40%) patients belonged to group 2 and 17 (34%) in group 3 (Table/Fig 3). Least dimension of spinal canal was documented at C5-6 levels in all position and at C2-3, C3-4, C4-5, C5-6 and C6-7 levels on extension positioning. On comparing the parameters in each position statistically significant difference was obtained (Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5). Upon assessment of the disc bulge and its association with age groups, grade 1 bulge was noted maximally in neutral position followed by flexion and extension position, more so, in those belonging to 36-50 years age group. However, grade 3 stenosis was maximum cases in the >50 year age group (Table/Fig 6).

Grading of spinal canal stenosis was done at all levels, ranging from 0 to 3 i.e., widest to narrowest spinal canal diameter. Severe grades of stenosis were obtained maximally at the C5-6 levels in all the neck positions- flexion, extension and neutral. Of these, maximum stenosis was derived on extending the neck at the C5-6 level (Table/Fig 7). Cord compression was observed at multiple levels with some being severe in nature resulting in cord signal change. These features were maximally noted on extension as compared to flexion and neutral (Table/Fig 8).

Similarly, foraminal stenosis was present at all intervertebral disc levels except C2-C3 level with maximum number of foramina were involved at the C5-C6 level, more so in the extension position. Ligamentum flavum hypertrophy was seen as a secondary aetiological factor resulting in canal compression/stenosis in addition to disc bulge thereby causing symptomatic pain. Maximum cases with thickening of ligamentum flava were at the C6-C7 level in the extension position (Table/Fig 9). Though, higher number of patients demonstrated foraminal stenosis in the elderly age group, no statistical significance was obtained. On flexion, upto 6 (12%)of elderly patients showed Ligamentum Flavum Haematoma (LFH) while 11 (22%) did not (p-value=0.021). On extension, most patients did not display LFH. Of those who did, maximum (14%) belonged to the elderly age group (p-value=0.016) (Table/Fig 10).

Facet joint involvement in the form of hypertrophy, osteophytes, subchondral erosions and articular surface irregularities with joint space fluid was noted as facetal joint arthropathy and the change in the frequency of identification of this pathology was compared on flexion, extension and neutral positioning. A slightly higher number of facetal arthropathic changes were appreciated on extension when compared to neutral and flexion, maximally at the C5-6 level. A relatively higher percentage of elderly patients showed features of facetal arthropathy that were better expressed on extension imaging 6 (12%). However, no statistical significance was obtained (Table/Fig 10). The pathological findings of cervical spondylosis in a 45-year-old male presenting with neck pain for three years are depicted in (Table/Fig 11).

Discussion

Cervical spondylosis is a clinical entity that is commonly encountered in day-to-day practice. It needs a thorough understanding of its pathogenesis, available efficacious diagnostic techniques and effective treatment modalities. Extension and Flexion are movements that are initiated physiologically at the lower cervical spine (13). Of the intervertebral levels, maximal mobility is seen to occur at the C5-C6 level and least at the C2-C3 level (14). The canal tends to be longer on flexion as compared to extension with the antero posterior diameter known to reduce in extension and mildly increase in flexion [15,16]. However, a sagittal canal diameter of ≤10 mm at C7 level was considered as a landmark, below which the occurrence of dynamic cord impingement on further extension tends to rise (17). Jha SC et al., in their study estimated the average length of the spinal cord, length of the cervical spinal anterior column and length of the cervical spinal posterior column (8). Their study showed a significant decrease in all of these parameters at each level in extension when compared to flexion. Also, higher grades of cervical canal stenosis were noted in extension when compared to flexion with statistically significant differences.

In the present study, a similar pattern of results was obtained, grades of stenosis were the highest (maximum stenosis) in extension. Also, significant difference was noted between the grades of canal stenosis on extension than compared to neutral and flexion. Maximum grades of stenosis were obtained at C5-6 intervertebral level on extension. This therefore, validates the need for additional incorporation of this positioning as a part of regular imaging protocol. A study has also shown that, MRI is a better imaging modality when compared to conventional plain radiography. MRI helped in better additional assessment of the disc, ligaments and surrounding soft tissues (18). Further, it was seen that on dynamic MRI, spinal canal widening was significantly higher with a difference of about 1.99 mm between flexion and extension positioning. Also, accurate assessment of the total number of levels involved was found to better on extension than flexion and neutral positioning (19); similar findings were obtained in present study as well. Recent studies, such as that by Lee SY et al., have also shown similar findings as the above mentioned studies (20). Here, the total cervical spine stenosis score, defined as the sum of the individual score at each level, was found to be significantly higher when in extension than neutral as well as higher in neutral position when compared to flexion. However, supine positioning of the patient was one of the limitations of their study as suggested by the authors.

In the present study, a similar assessment was performed and the authors obtained least cervical canal space dimension at C6-7 level in the neutral position and at C3-4, C5-6 and C6-7 levels in extension position. Also, narrowest diameter (i.e., corresponding to highest grades) was demonstrated on flexion and extension, significantly more so in extension. Extension positioning yielded a narrower canal, higher grade of stenosis and more severe and better appreciated ligamentum hypertrophy as well as the foraminal stenosis on extension. Extension MRI has been shown to help assess the true number of levels as well as the degree of narrowing of the spinal canal (18). Furthermore, assessment of presence of intramedullary high signal intensity necessitates the use of flexion MRI preoperatively as well. This is explained by flexion of the neck that results in increasing the spinal canal diameter thereby, improving estimation and visualisation of the degree of pathology. In the present study, the differing extent and severity of cord compression and resultant signal change on different neck was illustrated and obtained contradicting results as compared to the afore mentioned studies. The better visualisation and analysis of cord compression on extension positioning at C3-4 and C4-5 levels was observed. At C5-6, cord compression was equally demonstrable on flexion, extension and neutral. At C6-7 levels, extension and neutral were found to be equally helpful. Maximum depiction of cord signal changes was seen on extension, mainly at the C5-6 and C6-7 levels. At the C2-3 level, flexion positioning was found to be equally beneficial in detecting and accentuating the findings.

Additional contributory factors which play a causative role in cervical spinal canal stenosis such as ligamentum flavum hypertrophy were assessed. Significant flaval hypertrophy was noted at the C6-7 level on extending the neck. Sayit E et al., performed a study to assess the change in ligamentum flavum thickness on kinematic MRI in extension, flexion and neutral (21). They obtained findings corroborative with the present study wherein, the ligamentum flavum was found to be thicker on extension as compared to flexion. Additionally, the ligamentum flavum at the C6-7 and the C7-T1 level is known to be inherently thick on extension position. This was attributed to result in symptomatic neural and cord compression. A total of 40 patients showed facetal arthropathic changes of which maximal cases were demonstrated on extension maximally at the C5-6 level. Kinetic MRI has been analysed for its benefits in assessment of the lumbar spine and its use regularised (22). Radiographic examination with flexion and extension has been a much practiced maneuver for the assessment of degenerative pathologies of the cervical spine, however, the inclusion of this modification for the assessment of the cervical spine during MR imaging is not as prevalent in the current Indian scenario.As detailed earlier, all of the 50 patients were divided into three clinically relevant age groups. Disc bulge was seen predominantly in the middle aged and elderly patients with higher grades seen in the elderly. Similarly, ligamentum flavum hypertrophy and facet joint arthropathy was seen to affect the elderly, more so on extension. The middle-aged and young patients were affected largely by disc bulge, predominantly on flexing. Thus, avoiding excessive extension of the cervical spine may benefit the elderly patients while obviating activities involving excessive flexion at the neck may be supportive in avoiding symptoms in the middle aged and young patients. This interpretation, as per the authors assessment, helps clinicians and patients themselves to be aware of the dynamic worsening of cervical spondylotic symptoms and hopefully advice avoidance of activities exaggerating such neck positions. As per the knowledge, there is very scarce literature, where such correlation has been provided.

Limitation(s)

The accurate assessment of the obtained results and further generalisation to the normal population cannot be done. Though, normative data was taken into account, certain extent of change in canal space dimension, foraminal stenosis and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy is physiological on dynamic motion of the spinal cord. This needs to be considered as a part of assessment to avoid unnecessary false positive results.

Conclusion

The severity of disc bulge and grade of stenosis vary significantly challenging the ability of the diagnostic modalities to depict the pathology in totality. Addition of the flexion-extension projections in the imaging protocol of MRI evaluation was noted to be beneficial in delineating the actual extent and severity of spondylosis. These imaging findings also contributed in the clinical management by demonstrating the physical posture which worsened the compression. However, larger population-based studies have to be performed for further validation of the data.

References

1.
Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, Suzuki N, Nishi Y, Nakamura M, Yabe Y, et al. MRI of cervical intervertebral discs in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(1):19-24. Doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b1.7929. PMID: 9460946. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Kalsi-Ryan S, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: The clinical phenomenon and the current pathobiology of an increasingly prevalent and devastating disorder. Neuroscientist. 2013;19(4):409-21. Doi: 10.1177/1073858412467377. Epub 2012 Nov 30. PMID: 23204243. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Nurick S. The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1972;95(1):87-100. Doi: 10.1093/brain/95.1.87. PMID: 5023093. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Brain WR, Northfield D, Wilkinson M. The neurological manifestations of cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1952;75(2):187-225. Doi: 10.1093/brain/75.2.187. PMID: 14934989. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Zeitoun D, El Hajj F, Sariali E, Catonné Y, Pascal-Moussellard H. Evaluation of spinal cord compression and hyperintense intramedullary lesions on T2-weighted sequences in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy using flexion-extension MRI protocol. Spine J. 2015;15(4):668-74. Doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 5. PMID: 25485484. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Lee SY, Hur JW, Ryu KS, Kim JS, Chung HJ, Song MS. The clinical usefulness of preoperative imaging studies to select pathologic level in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Comparative analysis of three-position MRI and post-myelographic CT. Turk Neurosurg. 2019;29(1):127-33. Doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.23249-18.1. PMID: 30614510. [crossref]
7.
Yukawa Y, Kato F, Yoshihara H, Yanase M, Ito K. MR T2 image classification in cervical compression myelopathy: Predictor of surgical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(15):1675-78; discussion 1679. Doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318074d62e. PMID: 17621217. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Jha SC, Miyazaki M, Tsumura H. Kinetic change of spinal cord compression on flexion-extension magnetic resonance imaging in cervical spine. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018;174:86-91. Doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Sep 10. PMID: 30219623. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Kang Y, Lee JW, Koh YH, Hur S, Kim SJ, Chai JW, et al. New MRI grading system for the cervical canal stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(1):W134-40. Doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5560. PMID: 21700974. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Park HJ, Kim SS, Lee SY, Park NH, Chung EC, Rho MH, et al. A practical MRI grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis based on oblique sagittal images. Br J Radiol. 2013;86(1025):20120515. Doi: 10.1259/bjr.20120515. Epub 2013 Feb 14. PMID: 23410800; PMCID: PMC3635796. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Jeong HW, Yi J, Lee S, Park S, Kang KN, Lee J, et al. Prognostic value of cervical ligamentum flavum thickness as a morphological parameter to predict cervical stenosis. Medicine. 2021;100(34):e27084. Doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027084. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Kim JH, Sharan A, Cho W, Emam M, Hagen M, Kim SY. The prevalence of asymptomatic cervical and lumbar facet arthropathy: A computed tomography study. Asian Spine J. 2019;13(3):417-22. Doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0235. Epub 2019 Feb 13. PMID: 30744307; PMCID: PMC6547401. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Swartz EE, Floyd RT, Cendoma M. Cervical spine functional anatomy and the biomechanics of injury due to compressive loading. J Athl Train. 2005;40(3):155-61. PMID: 16284634; PMCID: PMC1250253.
14.
Penning L. Normal movements of the cervical spine. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978;130(2):317-26. Doi: 10.2214/ajr.130.2.317. PMID: 414586. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
McCracken B, Klineberg E, Pickard B, Wisner DH. Flexion and extension radiographic evaluation for the clearance of potential cervical spine injures in trauma patients. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(7):1467-73. Doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2598-z. Epub 2013 Feb 13. PMID: 23404352; PMCID: PMC3698361. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Nigro L, Donnarumma P, Tarantino R, Rullo M, Santoro A, Delfini R. Static and dynamic cervical MRI: two useful exams in cervical myelopathy. J Spine Surg. 2017;3(2):212-16. Doi: 10.21037/jss.2017.06.01. PMID: 28744502; PMCID: PMC5506301. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Bartlett RJ, Hill CA, Rigby AS, Chandrasekaran S, Narayanamurthy H. MRI of the cervical spine with neck extension: Is it useful? Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1016):1044-51. Doi: 10.1259/bjr/94315429. Epub 2012 Jan 3. PMID: 22215879; PMCID: PMC3587072. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Dalbayrak S, Yaman O, Firidin MN, Yilmaz T, Yilmaz M. The contribution of cervical dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Turk Neurosurg. 2015;25(1):36-42. Doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.9082-13.1. PMID: 25640543. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Zhang L, Zeitoun D, Rangel A, Lazennec JY, Catonné Y, Pascal-Moussellard H. Preoperative evaluation of the cervical spondylotic myelopathy with flexion-extension magnetic resonance imaging: About a prospective study of fifty patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(17):E1134-39. Doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f822c7. PMID: 21785299.[crossref][PubMed]
20.
Lee Y, Kim SY, Kim K. A dynamic magnetic resonance imaging study of changes in severity of cervical spinal stenosis in flexion and extension. Ann Rehabil Med. 2018;42(4):584-90. Doi: 10.5535/arm.2018.42.4.584. Epub 2018 Aug 31. PMID: 30180528; PMCID: PMC6129716. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Sayit E, Daubs MD, Aghdasi B, Montgomery SR, Inoue H, Wang CJ, et al. Dynamic changes of the ligamentum flavum in the cervical spine assessed with kinetic magnetic resonance imaging. Global Spine J. 2013;3(2):69-74. Doi: 10.1055/s- 0033-1337121. Epub 2013 Mar 19. PMID: 24436854; PMCID: PMC3854599. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Michelini G, Corridore A, Torlone S, Bruno F, Marsecano C, Capasso R, et al. Dynamic MRI in the evaluation of the spine: State of the art. Acta Biomed. 2018;89(1-S):89-101. Doi: 10.23750/abm.v89i1-S.7012. PMID: 29350639; PMCID: PMC6179074.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/59421.17855

Date of Submission: Aug 02, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Nov 15, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Mar 25, 2023
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 07, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 21, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Mar 16, 2023 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com