Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 117028

AbstractConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2023 | Month : May | Volume : 17 | Issue : 5 | Page : SE01 - SE04 Full Version

Different Medicinal Treatment Modalities in the Management of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Paediatric Population- A Narrative Review of Available Drug Approaches


Published: May 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63242.17845
Kushal Desai, Amar Taksande

1. Postgraduate Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Paediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Kushal Desai,
Postgraduate Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: kbdesai111@gmail.com

Abstract

Regardless of the size of a patient’s Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA), it is crucial for paediatric and adult cardiologists to have a thorough understanding of the condition’s origin, clinical ramifications, and treatment options. Possessing a PDA, no matter how small, might cause complications. Ibuprofen and indomethacin, both cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibitors, are used as the gold standard pharmacologic therapy for closing a PDA that has been produced surgically. These non-selective COX inhibitors bring about ductal constriction, in addition to lowering the synthesis of prostaglandin. However, these drugs may also have a broad array of unintended consequences. Interest in paracetamol for PDA constriction has recently increased due to fewer adverse effects than indomethacin or ibuprofen. Evidence that paracetamol is now a topic of intense study lends credence to this hypothesis. Information on the long-term effects of paracetamol is scarce in the paediatric population.

Keywords

Acetaminophen, Ibuprofen, Indomethacin, Paracetamol

The ductus arteriosus is a necessary part of foetal circulation that diverts cardiac output towards the placenta and away from the lungs to support systemic oxygenation (1). It is a vascular component that connects the two main arteries from the heart and joins the proximal descending aorta to the pulmonary artery, proximate to the beginning of the left branch pulmonary artery. Using this shunt, oxygenated blood from the placenta is able to enter the systemic circulation of the developing newborn. This allows the blood to avoid the foetus’s underdeveloped lungs. The ductus arteriosus must close as quickly as possible after birth, in order to enable the circulatory system to make the transition to the mature, split pattern of arteriovenous circulation. This shift must occur before the baby can breathe on its own (2). The circulation of placenta is clamped and eliminated at birth, which reduces the resistance in the pulmonary vascular bed, and thus, the lungs adapt for gas exchange and as a source of oxygenation; therefore, the Ductus Arteriosus (DA) is no longer required. In normal-term infants, the DA closes in >90% by 48 hours and completely by 96 hours of age (1).

The most prevalent cause of PDA, also known as a failure of ductus arteriosus closure, is premature delivery. Premature birth is the most predictable cause. As early as seven days of age, up to 64% of newborns who are 27 to 28-week-old and 87% of infants who are 24-week-old have an open ductus (2). It is the greatest reason for morbidity in preterm neonates, particularly in babies who weighed less than 1,000 gm at birth or who were delivered at a gestational age of less than 28 weeks (3). Gestational age and weight are inversely related to PDA in preterm neonates. Specifically, PDA is present in 80% of infants weighing less than 1,200 gm at birth, compared to 40% of infants weighing less than 2,000 gm at birth (4),(5),(6). Furthermore, symptomatic PDA is present in 48% of infants with a birth weight of less than 1,000 gm (7). This is an extremely high number in comparison to the incidence rate, which is 2/1000 among neonates who have reached their full gestation (3). After the first few weeks of a person’s existence, it is quite rare for ductal patency to persist. The magnitude of the PDA and the patient’s pre-existing circulatory condition are the two primary factors that define the PDA’s influence on the patient’s physiology as well as the therapeutic significance of the PDA. Sometimes, the PDA is “silent,” which means that it is not immediately visible clinically but is detected by echocardiography that was meant for another cause. It is possible that the personal digital assistant will be on the smaller side, on par with the industry norm, or on the larger side (8). The feasibility and safety of performing a percutaneous PDA closure in babies were investigated in a study conducted by Backes CH et al. It was shown that the technical success rate of percutaneous PDA closure was 92.2% (9). The incidence of all adverse events was 23.3%, and the incidence of clinically severe adverse events was 10.1% (9). PDA’s roots, clinical symptoms, and treatment choices are all things that cardiologists who work with children and adults need to be familiar with. No matter how large the PDA is, there is always the possibility of problems (3). Furthermore, it seems that the timing of the PDA treatment that is being advised is also quite important (10). In another study, the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia was significantly lower in early group survivors than in late group survivors (11). Furthermore, these beneficial effects of early surfactant treatment were still present after controlling for the various confounding factors that were used in the logistic models.

Hence, the present review discusses various drug therapies available and their technical success, efficacy, and safety demonstrated by various studies in the treatment of PDA. As a result, the findings of present research contribute to overall comprehension of the numerous PDA treatment drug choices.

Medicinal Approach

There are a variety of treatment options available, such as those that are conservative (that is, medical) or those that are medical, pharmacologic, or surgical. The conservative and medical treatment consists of a few different components, including a moderate restriction of fluid intake, increased airway pressures, and supportive care. Medication such as indomethacin, ibuprofen, or acetaminophen are a few examples of the kinds of drugs that might be used during pharmacologic treatment (12). Therefore, the usage of non selective COX inhibitors serves as the pharmacological beginning for the therapy of medical conditions. These inhibitors bring about ductal constriction, in addition to lowering the synthesis of prostaglandin. Both indomethacin and ibuprofen are non selective COX inhibitors, although ibuprofen and indomethacin have garnered the most attention from researchers, while indomethacin has seen the most clinical application (3). Treatment may either be preventive, presymptomatic, or symptomatic, and it can fall into any of these three categories. Long term morbidities such as chronic lung disease, retinopathy of prematurity, and neurodevelopmental delay are all associated with prematurity related developmental halt (12). It is recommended that patients who are at high risk for PDA, or who were born weighing less than 1,000 gm attempt non pharmacologic ways of therapy first, before turning to pharmaceuticals as a therapeutic option. When pulmonary vascular resistance is still significant in the days following delivery, therapy is often not recommended, even though it is possible that treatment is not always required. However, therapy alternatives should be researched if conservative efforts to manage pulmonary oedema have not been successful by the end of the second week, or if there is evidence of failure in either the heart or the kidneys. After the third week, it is anticipated that the efficacy of pharmacological treatments would begin to wane (10). In the future, pharmacological treatments for PDA may involve the use of drugs that restrict nitric oxide production and drugs that block prostaglandin receptors.

Indomethacin

Indomethacin is an effective inhibitor of the production of prostaglandin E2, and as a result, it reduces inflammation. The considerable rise in oxygen pressure that occurs in the blood shortly after delivery is the primary component that is responsible for the closure of the ductus arteriosus. This change occurs during the first few minutes after birth. This transformation happens not long after the baby is born. The hormone prostaglandin E2, which has the opposite effect of oxygen and so tends to prevent the ductus arteriosus from closing, is responsible for relaxing smooth muscle. This effect is generated by the hormone’s ability to relax smooth muscle. There is a possibility that the presence of oxygen is responsible for this phenomenon. It is possible that the fact that oxygen causes smooth muscle to contract might give some insight into why this is happening (13). The first dosage for the short course therapy is 0.2 mg/kg, and the subsequent doses are as follows: 0.1 mg/kg for neonates less than two-day-old, 0.2 mg/kg for newborns aged 2-7 days, and 0.25 mg/kg for babies more than seven-day-old. The total dose for the short course treatment is 0.5 mg/kg. It is essential to provide a single dose of 0.1 mg/kg once per day for a period of six days in order to treat the condition on a long term basis. This is the smallest possible dosage of medicine that should be taken. Both procedures are examples that are included in the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) (12). The seal of the ductus arteriosus is broken in preterm newborns who have respiratory distress syndrome and have high levels of prostaglandin E2. These preterm infants also have high amounts of prostaglandin E2. The elevated levels of prostaglandin E2 are to blame for this phenomenon (PDA). It is possible that preterm infants might benefit from receiving prophylactic indomethacin by a continuous infusion of moderate dosages of indomethacin. This is something that is worth investigating. Because of the likelihood that premature babies might gain from this, this potential now exists. When compared to babies that were carried to full term, preterm neonates had a lower likelihood of experiencing a positive outcome after the administration of indomethacin (13). Because of this impact, taking indomethacin may result in a short term decrease in the production of prostaglandins; nevertheless, one need not worry about this happening permanently. Because levels of prostaglandin return to normal within 6-7 days after short term medication is stopped, there is a greater chance that the duct may reopen during long term treatment. This fact contributes to the increased likelihood that the duct will reopen. The possibility of the duct reopening as a result of this is increased. This is only one of the many reasons why it is essential to continue therapy even after it has been completed. If, at the end of 2the first round of treatment, the PDA is still evident, a second dosage of indomethacin will be administered before the surgical ligation operation is carried out. This is because indomethacin has a high proportion of effectiveness in preventing PDA (14). There is some evidence that taking indomethacin as a prophylactic approach may lower the risk of having PDA, but there is no evidence that this reduces the risk of developing BPD. It’s possible that this is because of the detrimental effects that it has as a side effect on oxygenation and the production of oedema, but it’s more likely that this is just a coincidence (15). Liebowitz M and Cluyman RI reported that indomethacin reduces BPD or death in comparison to delayed conservative PDA management (16).

Ibuprofen

The mechanism of action of Ibuprofen is, it acts by inhibiting synthesis of prostaglandin (17). Mitra S et al., conducted a meta-analysis and reported that a high dose of oral ibuprofen (15-20 mg/kg followed by 7.5-10.0 mg/kg every 12-24 hours for a total of three doses) was found to be associated with a significantly higher likelihood of PDA closure than two of the most widely used forms of pharmacotherapy {i.e., standard doses of intravenous (i.v.) ibuprofen and intravenous indomethacin} (18). The ibuprofen dose that is traditionally used (10 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg, and 5 mg/kg, each given at 24 hour intervals) is based on old pharmacokinetic data obtained from the experiences of preterm infants (18). In another meta-analysis by Ohlsson A et al., ibuprofen was found to be as effective as indomethacin to close a PDA and causes fewer transient adverse effects on the kidneys and reduces the risk of Necrotising Enterocolitis (NEC), a serious condition that affects the gut (19). Ohlsson A et al., revealed that a long-term follow-up studies to 18 months of age and to the age of school entry are needed to decide whether ibuprofen or indomethacin is the drug of choice for closing a PDA (19). The regimen that works for the management of PDA with ibuprofen consisted of three doses. The proposed first dose is 10 mg/kg intravenously which is followed by twice dosages, at 24 and 48 hours later of 5 mg/kg. The subsequent dose(s) should be held if urine output is <0.6 mL/kg/hr till the kidney function has reverted to normal. In case there is a failure in the closure of ductus arteriosus or it reopens laterally, another follow-up course of ibuprofen may be required (17). Lago P et al., conducted a comparative analysis and reported that ibuprofen has lesser adverse effects in terms of fluid retention and urine output besides much the similar efficacy and safety index in preterm infants who had respiratory distress syndrome in closing PDA in comparison with indomethacin (20). However, there was no reported incidence of increase in cases of intracranial haemorrhage was observed after treatment with ibuprofen. Ohlsson A et al., reported that Ibuprofen is as effective as indomethacin in closing a PDA and reduces the risk of developing NEC and transient renal insufficiency. Ibuprofen was not associated with any other side effects (21).

Ibuprofen must be used within half an hour of preparation. The dose could be infused over 15 minutes continuously nevertheless it must not be administered in the same i.v. line with total parenteral nutrition. Furthermore, the unused or leftover solution of ibuprofen must be discarded as there is no preservative content in it. About 17.1 mg/mL (equivalent to 10 mg/mL ibuprofen) is the available concentration of ibuprofen lysine and these vials must be stored away from sunlight at room temperature (20°-25°C) (17).

Paracetamol

More lately, oral or i.v. administration of paracetamol (acetaminophen) gained attention in PDA treatment (22). However, ductal closure with paracetamol was first reported by Hammerman C et al., who described five cases of haemodynamically significant PDA among preterm infants of gestational age of 26-32 weeks and postnatal age of <35 days, who had either contraindications to ibuprofen therapy or had failed therapy (23). Ductal closure was achieved in <48 hours after each of these infant patients were treated with off-label oral paracetamol (15 mg/kg per dose six hourly) (23). Moderate certainty evidence proposes that there is possibly little or no difference in the efficiency between ibuprofen and paracetamol; low-certainty evidence reveals that there is probably no or little difference in efficiency between indomethacin and paracetamol; for low certainty evidence, firstly prophylactic paracetamol might be more effective than placebo/no intervention; secondly, early paracetamol treatment may be more effective than placebo/no intervention; thirdly, probably little or no difference in effectiveness between the combination of paracetamol and ibuprofen versus alone ibuprofen and further there is probably little or no difference between late paracetamol treatment and placebo after the first course of treatment for the closure of PDA (24).

Before paracetamol introduction, in case of contraindication for Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs), such as active or recent intracerebral haemorrhage (<48 h), thrombocytopenia (<50,000/mm3), bleeding diathesis (meaning INR >1.5 and/or haematuria, blood in the stool, tracheal secretions or at the injection site), sepsis, NEC, intestinal perforation, pulmonary haemorrhage, hepatic damage with severe hyperbilirubinemia, renal dysfunction (oliguria<1 mL/kg/h also after adequate hydration, serum creatinine >110-140 mmol, and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) >14 mmol/L), and hypersensitivity to ibuprofen, the only available solution was surgical ligation with all the connected risks (22). Mohanty PK et al., studied the role of paracetamol orally in closing Haemodynamically significant PDA (hsPDA) in preterm infants with gestational age <32 weeks in cases where there was a contraindication for ibuprofen and 72.5% infants showed successful response with no major complications reported (25). Similarly, Surak A et al., also reported that acetaminophen could be used in for the closure of hsPDA (26). In another meta-analysis by Terrin G et al., the efficacy and safety of paracetamol seemed to be comparable with those of ibuprofen (27).

Recently, concern has been raised about paracetamol’s presumed superior safety profile based on reports of neurocognitive impairment after prenatal exposure and of hypotension following i.v. administration. This concern underscores the need for appropriate pharmacodynamic and follow-up studies examining both the route and the dose of paracetamol as well as the population being studied before it can be concluded which is the most effective and safest drug to use when PDA treatment is needed (19). Valerio E et al., studied the efficacy and safety of i.v. paracetamol for PDA closure in a 23-32 week preterm population, as “first-line” (when traditional ibuprofen treatment was contraindicated) or “rescue” treatment (after ibuprofen failed) and reported that the cumulative efficacy of consecutive cycles of i.v. paracetamol on PDA closure was confirmed after both “first-line” and “rescue” treatment, the overall PDA closure rates being, respectively, 56.7% and 61.1% (p=0.762) after two cycles and 63.3% and 77.8% (p=0.295) after three cycles (28). No toxicity was apparent after either “first-line” or “rescue” i.v. paracetamol treatment. Yang B et al., reported that the arterial duct closure rate was comparable between the acetaminophen (70.5%) and ibuprofen groups (76.7%), plasma and urinary Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels in the acetaminophen group were significantly decreased than those in the ibuprofen group and the incidence of oliguria was less in acetaminophen group (2.3%) than the ibuprofen group (14.0%); however, this difference was not significant statistically (29). Balachander B et al., also reported that paracetamol is as effective as ibuprofen for PDA closure in preterm neonates but ibuprofen possessed an enlarged risk for acute renal injury in comparison to paracetamol (30). Xiao Y et al., concluded that paracetamol can induce early PDA closure without significant side effects but its efficacy is not superior to that of indomethacin (31). Sinha R et al., the PDA closure was achieved within 48 hours of treatment with oral paracetamol in a dose of 15 mg/kg eight hourly, with no reported complication in preterm neonates who had failed or had absolute contraindication with ibuprofen (32). More studies pertaining to the efficacy of paracetamol in the treatment of PDA is demonstrated in (Table/Fig 1) (28),(29),(30),(31),(32),(33),(34),(35).

Conclusion

The administration of a COX inhibitor, such as indomethacin or ibuprofen, is considered the gold standard for PDA closure, but there is a possibility of severe adverse effects with these drugs. Furthermore, due to fewer adverse effects of paracetamol compared to indomethacin or ibuprofen, the present review concludes that paracetamol is clinically effective for the treatment of PDA closure in a Very Low Birth Weight (VLBW)/Extremely Low Birth Weight (ELBW) preterm population. However, Randomised Control Trials (RCTs) are further needed to broaden investigations reporting the efficacy and safety of paracetamol for PDA closure in preterm neonates.

References

1.
Backes CH, Hill KD, Shelton EL, Slaughter JL, Lewis TR, Weisz DE, et al. Patent ductus arteriosus: A contemporary perspective for the Pediatric and adult cardiac care provider. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2022;11(17):e025784. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Gillam-Krakauer M, Reese J. Diagnosis and management of patent ductus arteriosus. Neoreviews. 2018;19(7):e394-e402. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Sasi A, Deorari A. Patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Indian Pediatrics. 2011;48:301-08. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Dice JE, Bhatia J. Patent ductus arteriosus: An overview. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2007;12(3):138-46. Doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-12.3.138. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Clyman RI. Ibuprofen and patent ductus arteriosus. New Engl J Med. 2000;343:728-39. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Ohlsson A, Shah SS. Ibuprofen for the prevention of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm and/or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020;6(6):CD004213. [crossref]
7.
Jasani B, Mitra S, Shah PS. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) for patent ductus arteriosus in preterm or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018;12:CD010061.
8.
Schneider DJ, Moore JW. Patent ductus arteriosus. Circulation. 2006;114(17):1873-82. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Backes CH, Rivera BK, Bridge JA, Armstrong AK, Boe BA, Berman DP, et al. Percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure during infancy: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2017;139(2):e20162927. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Gillam-Krakauer M, Hagadorn JI, Reese J. Pharmacological closure of the patent ductus arteriosus: When treatment still makes sense. J Perinatol. 2019;39(11):1439-41. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Hennelly M, Greenberg RG, Aleem S. An update on the prevention and management of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics. 2021;12:405-19. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Conrad C, Newberry D. Understanding the pathophysiology, implications, and treatment options of patent ductus arteriosus in the neonatal population. Advances in Neonatal Care. 2019;19(3):179-87. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Pacifici GM. Clinical pharmacology of indomethacin in preterm infants: Implications in patent ductus arteriosus closure. Pediatric Drugs. 2013;15:363-76. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Narayanan-Sankar M, Clyman RI. Pharmacologic closure of patent ductus arteriosus in the neonate. Neo Reviews. 2003;4:215-21.
15.
Schmidt B, Roberts RS, Fanaroff A, Davis P, Kirpalani HM, Nwaesei C, et al. Indomethacin prophylaxis, patent ductus arteriosus, and the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia: Further analyses from the Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms (TIPP). J Pediatr. 2006;148:730-34. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Liebowitz M, Clyman RI. Prophylactic indomethacin compared with delayed conservative management of the patent ductus arteriosus in extremely preterm infants: Effects on neonatal outcomes. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2017;187:119-26. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Poon G. Ibuprofen lysine (NeoProfen) for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2007;20(1):83-85. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Mitra S, Florez ID, Tamayo ME, Mbuagbaw L, Vanniyasingam T, Veroniki AA, et al. Association of placebo, indomethacin, ibuprofen, and acetaminophen with closure of hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2018;319(12):1221-38. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Ohlsson A, Walia R, Shah SS. Ibuprofen for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm and/or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(4):CD003481. [crossref]
20.
Lago P, Bettiol T, Salvadori S, Pitassi I, Vianello A, Chiandetti L, et al. Safety and efficacy of ibuprofen versus indomethacin in preterm infants treated for patent ductus arteriosus: A randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Pediatrics. 2002;161(4):202. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Ohlsson A, Walia R, Shah SS. Ibuprofen for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm or low birth weight (or both) infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;2(2):CD003481. [crossref]
22.
Bardanzellu F, Neroni P, Dessì A, Fanos V. Paracetamol in patent ductus arteriosus treatment: Efficacious and safe? Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1438038. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Hammerman C, Bin-Nun A, Markovitch E, Schimmel MS, Kaplan M, Fink D. Ductal closure with paracetamol: A surprising new approach to patent ductus arteriosus treatment. Pediatrics. 2011;128(6):e1618-21. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Meena V, Meena DS, Rathore PS, Chaudhary S, Soni JP. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of indomethacin, ibuprofen, and paracetamol in the closure of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm neonates–A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Pediatric Cardiology. 2020;13(2):130. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Mohanty PK, Karthik Nagesh N, Razak A. Oral paracetamol for closure of patent ductus arteriosus in selected preterm neonates. Indian Pediatrics. 2016;53(2):171-72.
26.
Surak A, Jain A, Hyderi A. Different approaches for patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants using acetaminophen. World Journal of Pediatrics. 2022;18(4):243-50. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Terrin G, Conte F, Oncel MY, Scipione A, McNamara PJ, Simons S, et al. Paracetamol for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm neonates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 2016;101(2):F127-36. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Valerio E, Valente MR, Salvadori S, Frigo AC, Baraldi E, Lago P. Intravenous paracetamol for PDA closure in the preterm: A single-center experience. European Journal of Pediatrics. 2016;175:953-66. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Yang B, Gao X, Ren Y, Wang Y, Zhang Q. Oral paracetamol vs. oral ibuprofen in the treatment of symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants: A randomised controlled trial. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2016;12(4):2531-36. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Balachander B, Mondal N, Bhat V, Adhisivam B, Kumar M, Satheesh S, et al. Comparison of efficacy of oral paracetamol versus ibuprofen for PDA closure in preterms-a prospective randomised clinical trial. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2020;33(9):1587-92. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Xiao Y, Liu H, Hu R, You Q, Zeng M, Jiang X. Efficacy and safety of paracetamol for patent ductus arteriosus closure in preterm infants: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2020;7:568. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Sinha R, Negi V, Dalal SS. An interesting observation of PDA closure with oral paracetamol in preterm neonates. J Clin Neonatol. 2013;2(1):30-32. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Guimarães AFM, Araújo FDR, Meira ZMA, Tonelli HAF, Duarte GG, Ribeiro LC, et al. Acetaminophen in low doses for closure of the ductus arteriosus of the premature. Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2019;12(2):97-102. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Härkin P, Härmä A, Aikio O, Valkama M, Leskinen M, Saarela T, et al. Paracetamol accelerates closure of the ductus arteriosus after premature birth: A randomised trial. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2016;177:72-77. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Aikio O, Härkin P, Saarela T, Hallman M. Early paracetamol treatment associated with lowered risk of persistent ductus arteriosus in very preterm infants. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2014;27(12):1252-56.[crossref][PubMed]

Tables and Figures
[Table / Fig - 1]
DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63242.17845

Date of Submission: Feb 03, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Mar 03, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Apr 21, 2023
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? NA
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 13, 2023
• Manual Googling: Mar 08, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Apr 13, 2023 (16%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com