Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 136403

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : May | Volume : 17 | Issue : 5 | Page : PC34 - PC38 Full Version

Association of CD10 and VEGF Expression with Tumour Characteristics and Treatment Response in Patients of Carcinoma Breast- A Prospective Cohort Study


Published: May 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62235.17833
Archa Prasad, Himanshu Agrawal, Nikhil Gupta, Arun Kumar Gupta, Minakshi Bharadwaj, CK Durga

1. Senior Resident, Department of Surgery, ABVIMS and Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, UCMS and GTB Hospital, New Delhi, India. 3. Professor, Department of Surgery, ABVIMS and Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi, India. 4. Professor, Department of Surgery, ABVIMS and Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi, India. 5. Professor, Department of Pathology, ABVIMS and Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi, India. 6. Professor, Department of Surgery, ABVIMS and Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Himanshu Agrawal,
Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Ward 22, UCMS and GTB Hospital, Dilshad Garden, New Delhi-110095, India.
E-mail: himagr1987@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Majority of breast cancer patients receive systemic therapy. This has led to an extensive search for effective factors to predict the outcome. Two such markers for breast cancer are Cluster of Differentiation 10 (CD10) and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF). There is limited data available in the literature to support these parameters in breast cancer patients, especially from the Indian subcontinent.

Aim: To ascertain the association of pre-chemotherapy levels of CD10 and VEGF with tumour load in breast cancer and treatment response.

Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of Surgery in collaboration with the Department of Pathology at Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India, from November 2015 to February 2017. A total of 39 patients with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (LABC) were included in the study. Preoperative levels of CD10 and VEGF were estimated in large needle core biopsy specimens. Standard anthracycline based chemotherapy was given to all patients as a 21 days cycle for three cycles. All patients underwent modified radical mastectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT). Levels of CD10 and VEGF were estimated again in the mastectomy specimen. Increase/decrease or no change in VEGF and CD10 expression percentage was ascertained for each patient after systemic therapy. Variables that were studied in the present study were Tumour, Nodes, and Metastasis (TNM) staging of patient, expression of VEGF and CD10 in large needle core biopsy specimens and its association with tumour load, response to NACT and its association with CD10 and VEGF and histopathological characteristics like presence or absence of lymphovascular invasion oestrogen, progesterone and Human Epidermal Growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2)/neu receptor status. Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0. Association between two ordinal variables was established using Kruskal-Wallis test. A comparison of ordinal paired data was done using Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test. The p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: The mean age of study participants was 42.0±11.4 years. Increase in TNM staging lead to higher CD10 and VEGF expression (p-value <0.05 and <0.029, respectively). There was a significant reduction in CD10 and VEGF expression postchemotherapy (p-value <0.05). CD10 expression was found higher in subjects with ER-negative status (22 patients) with p-value=0.014 and HER2/neu positive status (19 patients) with p-value=0.028. Subjects with HER2/neu positive status had higher VEGF expression (20 patients) with p-value=0.032.

Conclusion: CD10 and VEGF can be used as independent markers for indicating poor prognosis and can be used as target for development of novel therapies in carcinoma breast.

Keywords

Effective factors, Markers, Novel therapies

Carcinoma breast is one of the most common malignancy of women, both in developed and developing nations. It amounts to about 25% to 33% of all female malignancies worldwide and in urban areas of India, it is the most common cancer (1). Moreover, over 50% breast cancer patients in India present in stage III and IV disease (2). Early invasive breast cancer represents stage I, II a and stage II b. LABC extends beyond the breast to the skin or chest wall, but distant metastasis is absent. The term is commonly associated with stage III cancer. NACT is increasingly being used in the treatment of primary breast cancer, which is diagnosed by core biopsy prior to surgical excision. NACT has gained worldwide acceptance in treating LABC (3). For around 25 years, LABC are first approached through systemic therapy, while in early breast cancer, it has a role in tumour load reduction. So, a patient may be converted into a breast conservation surgery rather than a radicle surgery. On the other hand, systemic therapy is the mainstay of treatment for metastatic breast cancers (3).

Considerable amount of search has undergone for new and more effective parameters which can predict the outcome in breast cancer more effectively. This can be attributed to the fact that, most of the breast cancer patients receive systemic therapy. At present, Oestrogen Receptor (ER) and Progesterone Receptor (PR) status are the most important and helpful predictive factors available (4). Tumours with increased HER2 augmentation are linked with poor outcome and higher grade tumour (5). New markers have been recognised which are able to predict invasive and metastatic tumour potency. These markers could be of help in making a proper treatment decision. The two such markers for breast cancer are CD10 and VEGF (6). Myoepithelial cells of normal breast tissue have been found to harbour CD10 positivity (7). CD10 is a zinc-dependent peptidase which comes under metalloproteinase class. Structural similarity between Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs) and stromalysin might play a role in facilitating cancer cell takeover and/or metastasis. It has further been found that, its expression in stroma of invasive breast cancer correlates with poor prognosis and high grade (8),(9). Experimental data from the past also indicate that, CD10 may be a potential target of new cancer therapies (10).

VEGF, is a multifunctional cytokine that acts as a highly specific mitogen on endothelial cells. It is recognised as one of the most important regulators of physiological and pathological angiogenesis (11). Tumour angiogenesis is associated with invasiveness and the metastatic potential of various malignancies. Furthermore, the increased expression of VEGF has been associated with increased risk of metastasis, recurrence, and poor prognosis in many cancers (12).

However, there is a limited data available in the literature to support these parameters in breast cancer patients especially from Indian subcontinent (13),(14). The present study was aimed to firstly, ascertain the association of pre-chemotherapy levels of CD10 and VEGF with tumour load in breast cancer which included TNM staging of tumour, grade of tumour, lymphovascular invasion, and receptor status and to secondly, find the association of pre-chemotherapy levels of CD10 and VEGF with post-chemotherapy levels and treatment response.

Material and Methods

A prospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of Surgery in collaboration with Department of Pathology, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India, from November 2015 to February 2017. Ethical clearance T.P(MD/MS)(39/2015)/IEC/PGIMER/RML/4914 was obtained. All subjects gave written informed consent before being enrolled in the study.

Inclusion criteria: Patients in the age range of 15-70 years with LABC and who gave written consent were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with LABC who received prior NACT, those unfit for chemotherapy, and patients with any other synchronous malignancy were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: Sample size was calculated and considered according to the previous study with p=5% and d=absolute error of 5% (15).

Study Procedure

Patients were investigated with routine blood investigation, chest X-ray, Electrocardiogram (ECG), ultrasound breast and/or bilateral mammography, large needle core biopsy and ultrasound abdomen. Clinically, TNM staging was done and cases were selected after confirmation from histologically proven biopsy reports. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) version 8 TNM staging system was used for staging of patients (16). Preoperative levels of CD10 and VEGF were estimated in large needle core biopsy specimen. Estimation of VEGF and CD10 was done in the following way:

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF): Tumour tissue was fixed in formalin and then was fixed in paraffin. Detection was performed using super sensitive Polymer-Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Detection System. Semi-quantitative scoring of staining intensity of cytoplasm of tumour cells was scored according to the table below (Table/Fig 1).

A homogenous staining in tumour cells lead to a score of 4 when, there was a doubt between two scores, the highest score was chosen.

Cluster of Differentiation 10 (CD 10): CD10 expression in tumour stroma was assessed by IHC (Table/Fig 2).

The percentage of tumour cell expressing VEGF and CD10 antigens were estimated and documented before chemotherapy. Standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 was given to all patients as a 21 days cycle for three cycles. All patients underwent modified radical mastectomy after NACT. Levels of CD10 and VEGF were estimated again in the mastectomy specimen. Increase/decrease or no change in VEGF and CD10 expression percentage was ascertained for each patient after systemic therapy.

The following variables were studied during the study:

• TNM staging of the patient.
• Expression of VEGF and CD10 in large needle core biopsy specimen and its association with tumour load.
• Response to NACT and its association with CD10 and VEGF.
• Histopathology characteristics-

Presence or absence of lymphovascular invasion. Oestrogen, progesterone and HER2/neu receptor status.

Response to NACT was ascertained using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) which includes the following (17):

• Complete responders- Disappearance of all target lesions.
• Partial Responders- Atleast a 30% decrease in the sum of the Longest Diameters (LD) of target lesions.
• Non responders included progressive disease and stable disease.
• Progressive disease- Atleast a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
• Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial responder nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 22.0. Data was represented as mean±SD. Mean value of continuous variables was compared using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Association between two ordinal variables was established using Kruskal-Wallis test. Comparison of ordinal paired data was done using Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test. The p-value <0.05 was taken as significant.

Results

A total of 39 patients were included in the present study. Their mean age was 42.0±11.4 years (range 15-70 years). Out of 39 patients, 38 (97.4%) were females and 1 (2.5%) was male.

Frequency distribution of TNM staging of the subjects: Out of 39 subjects included in the study, 13 were in TNM stage II b. 26 subjects were in TNM stage III (11 had stage III a and 12 and 3 had stage III b and III c, respectively).

Comparison of effect of TNM staging on pre-chemotherapy CD10 and VEGF expression: Kruskal-Wallis test was done to evaluate the relationship between TNM staging and CD10, VEGF expression. It was observed that, increase in TNM staging leads to higher CD10 and VEGF expression. (p-value <0.05) (Table/Fig 3). Mean CD10 and VEGF expression was calculated using standard formula for mean calculation. The total expression of CD10 and VEGF in each subset was summed up and divided by the number of patients in each subset. Out of total 39 subjects in large needle core biopsy, 2 (5.1%) subjects were CD10 negative, 25 (64.1%) and 12 (30.8%) subjects were strongly positive and weakly positive respectively. In mastectomy specimen, 3 (7.7%) subjects were CD10 negative, 26 (66.7%) were weakly positive and 10 (25.6%) subjects were strongly positive (Table/Fig 4).

Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test analysis suggests that, there was a significant reduction in CD10 expression after chemotherapy. (p-value=0.002). Out of total 39 subjects tested for VEGF expression in large needle core biopsy, 5 (12.8%) were weakly positive, 12 (30.8%) and 22 (56.4%) were moderately and strongly positive, respectively. In mastectomy specimen tested for VEGF, 23 (59.0%) were weakly positive, 11 (28.2%) and 5 (12.8%) were moderately and strongly positive, respectively (Table/Fig 5).

Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test analysis suggests that, there was a significant reduction in VEGF expression after chemotherapy. (p-value <0.001)

Descriptive statistic of subjects according to their response to therapy: Out of total 39, 23 (59.0%) subjects were completely responded to chemotherapy, 10 (25.6%) partially responded and 6 (15.4%) did not responded at all.

Effect of chemotherapy response on CD 10 and VEGF expression: Wilcoxon signed-rank sum analysis suggests that, subjects who had complete and partial chemotherapy response had statistically significant reduction in CD10 and VEGF expression in Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) as compared to large needle core biopsy sample. In chemotherapy, non responder subject there was no reduction in CD10 and VEGF expression was observed. Decrease in CD10 and VEGF expression was more in complete responder than in partial responder (Table/Fig 6).

Association between lymphovascular invasion and CDCD10 expression: Kruskal-Wallis test was done to evaluate the relationship between lymphovascular invasion and CD10 expression. No relation was observed between CD10 expression and lymphovascular invasion. Chi-square value was 0.072 and p-value=0.788.

Association between lymphovascular invasion and VEGF expression: Kruskal-Wallis analysis suggested no association between lymphovascular and VEGF expression. Chi-square value was 0.996 and p-value=0.318.

Descriptive statistic of subjects based on their hormone receptor profile: The IHC profiling of study subjects, was done using ER/PR and HER2/neu detection. 17 (43.6%) subjects were ER positive and 16 (41%) and 20 (51.3%) subjects were PR and HER2/neu positive respectively.

Association between hormone receptor and CDCD10 expression: The Kruskal-Wallis analysis suggests that CD10 expression was higher in subjects with ER negative status and HER2/neu positive status. PR receptor status had no association with CD10 expression. Kruskal-Wallis statistical analysis suggests that, subjects with HER2/neu positive status had higher VEGF expression. The ER and PR receptor status had no association with VEGF expression (Table/Fig 7).

Discussion

Breast cancer is the principal cause of death from cancer among women globally. In Indian women after cervical cancer, the breast is the second most common site of cancer (1). The survival rates have improved over the years, with a five-year survival rate of 63% in the 1960s, 75% in the 1970s, 79% in the 1980s and 90% from 1995 to 2005. The greatest improvement is seen to be in women younger than 50 years of age, where, death rates have decreased by 3.2% per year (2). In women, over 50 years, the death rates have reduced by 2% per year. The reduction in mortality is attributed to early detection via mammographic screening and improvements in therapy (3). Newer markers that have a better predictive value for tumour invasiveness and metastatic potency can alter the course of treatment. The two such markers for breast cancer are CD10 and VEGF (6).

In the present study, it was observed that, in patients with higher TNM staging, there was statistically significant higher expression of CD10 and VEGF (p-value <0.001 and p-value <0.001 respectively). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the expression of tumour load and CD10 and VEGF expression (p-value <0.047 and p-value <0.014 respectively). Similar results were obtained by Dhande AN et al., in their study (18). They also found a positive association between tumour stage and CD10 expression. Wang Q et al., in their study found that there was a significant positive association between TNM stage and VEGF expression (19). There was no statistically significant association observed between CD10 and VEGF expression and PR status (p-value=0.671 and 0.585, respectively). Increased CD10 and VEGF expression was observed in HER2/neu positive subjects (p-value= 0.028 and 0.032, respectively). This association was found to be statistically significant. ER receptor status positivity was found to have a statistically significant association with CD10 expression (p-value=0.014) while no such relationship could be established with VEGF expression (p-value=0.104). Agarwal K et al., in their study on 29 patients found that, strong CD10 expression was associated with hormone receptor negativity and HER2/neu overexpression (13). Kamarudin NA et al., also found a similar result in their study. In their study, CD10 positivity was found more in ER-negative cases. However, there was no association between stromal CD10 expression with tumour grade, stage, PR, and HER2 status (20). Similar results were obtained by Jana SH et al., in their study on 70 patients. They also found a positive significant association between CD10 expression and HER2/neu positivity (21).

In the present study, no statistically significant relation was observed between CD10 and VEGF expression and lymphovascular invasion (p-value=0.788 and 0.318, respectively). Shen S et al., in their study on 392 patients found similar results that, there was no association between VEGF expression and lymphovascular invasion (22). However, Chen Z et al., in their 44 patients found a positive significant association between VEGF expression and lymphovascular invasion (23). Ali HD et al., in their study on 91 patients found a positive association between CD10 expression and lymphovascular invasion (24). Neo-adjuvant anthracyclin-based chemotherapy changes the expression of CD10 and VEGF expression in breast cancer and is, therefore, non static. Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test analysis suggests that, there is a significant reduction in CD10 and VEGF expression after chemotherapy (p-value <0.001 and <0.05, respectively). Ruihua T et al., in their study found a similar result. They concluded that, VEGF expression significantly reduces after NACT (25). Thomas S et al., in their study found that, there was a decrease in CD10 expression after NACT (15). In the present study, subjects who had a complete and partial response to chemotherapy had a statistically significant reduction in VEGF and CD10 expression, while patients who were non responders had no reduction in VEGF and CD10 expression. Similar results were found by Thomas S et al., who concluded that, partial and complete responders had a significant reduction in CD10 expression (15). Inspite of authors best efforts no study comparing tumour response and VEGF expression could be found.

Limitation(s)

The small sample size was one of the limitation.

Conclusion

The CD10 and VEGF expression was strongly associated with a well-established negative prognostic marker that is, HER2/neu overexpression, ER/PR negativity, higher tumour grade, and a higher tumour load thus, indicating CD10 and VEGF can be used as an independent marker indicating poor prognosis and can be used as target for the development of novel therapies. A steady or decrease in VEGF and CD10 expression associates with complete or partial clinical response, while an increase in CD10 and VEGF expression appears to be associated with poor clinical response to NACT (anthracycline-based therapy). Therefore, CD10 and VEGF have prognostic significance.

References

1.
Chopra R. The Indian scene. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(18 Suppl):106S-11S. PMID: 11560984. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11560984/.
2.
Esteva FJ, Hortobagyi GN. Locally advanced breast cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1999;13(2):457-72, vii. PMID: 10363140 Doi: 10.1016/s0889-8588(05)70065-4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10363140/. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Kaufmann M, von Minckwitz G, Smith R. International expert panel on the use of primary (preoperative) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: Review and recommendations. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(13):2600-08. PMID: 12829681. 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.136. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(23):4469. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12829681/. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG. Human breast cancer: Correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science. 1987;235(4785):177-82. PMID: 3798106 Doi: 10.1126/science.3798106. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3798106/. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Tacca O, Penault-Llorca F, Abrial C. Changes in and prognostic value of hormone receptor status in a series of operable breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Oncologist. 2007;12(6):636-43. PMID: 17602055. 10.1634/theoncologist.12-6-636. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17602055/. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Zaha DC. Significance of immunohistochemistry in breast cancer. World J Clin Oncol. 2014;5(3):382-92. PMID: 25114853 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.382. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4127609/. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Kesse-Adu R, Shousha S. Myoepithelial markers are expressed in at least 29% of oestrogen receptor negative invasive breast carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2004;17(6):646-52. PMID: 15073596. Doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800103. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15073596/. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Iwaya K, Ogawa H, Izumi M. Stromal expression of CD10 in invasive breast carcinoma: A new predictor of clinical outcome. Virchows Arch. 2002;440(6):589-93. PMID: 12070597. 10.1007/s00428-002-0639-4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12070597/. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Makretsov NA, Hayes M, Carter BA. Stromal CD10 expression in invasive breast carcinoma correlates with poor prognosis, estrogen receptor negativity, and high grade. Mod Pathol. 2007;20(1):84-89. PMID: 17143263 10.1038/modpathol.3800713. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17143263/. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Pan C, Cardarelli PM, Nieder MH. CD10 is a key enzyme involved in the activation of tumour-activated peptide prodrug CPI-0004Na and novel analogues: Implications for the design of novel peptide prodrugs for the therapy of CD10+tumours. Cancer Res. 2003;63(17):5526-31. https://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article/63/17/5526/510480/CD10-Is-a-Key-Enzyme-Involved-in-the-Activation-of.
11.
Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor: Basic science and clinical progress. Endocr Rev. 2004;25(4):581-611. PMID: 15294883. Doi: 10.1210/er.2003-0027. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15294883/. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Soriano-Irigaray L, Rodríguez-Lucena F, Jiménez Pulido I. GRP-177. The use of bevacizumab in metastatic breast cancer. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy: Science and Practice. 2013;20:A63-A64. Doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2013-000276.177. https://ejhp.bmj.com/content/20/Suppl_1/A63.3. [crossref]
13.
Thomas S, Babu RJ, Agarwal K, Puri V, Jain M, Andley M, et al. Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on stromal CD10 antigens in breast cancer - A preliminary study. Indian J Cancer. 2013;50(1):46-51.[crossref][PubMed]
14.
Chaudhary D, Singh M, Kushwaha P, Agarwal R, Singh V, Mandal S, et al. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, CD10, and factor 8 in phyllodes tumour: A 5-year study of 38 cases. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics. 2020;16(6):1408-11. 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_300_18. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Thomas S, Babu RJ, Agarwal K. Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on stromal CD10 antigens in breast cancer- a preliminary study. Indian J Cancer. 2013;50(1):46-51. PMID: 23713046. Doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.112299. https:// pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23713046/. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Teichgraeber DC, Guirguis MS, Whitman GJ. Breast cancer staging: Updates in the AJCC cancer staging manual and current challenges for radiologists, from the AJR special series on cancer staging. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2021;217(2):278-90. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Nishino M, Jagannathan JP, Ramaiya NH, Van den Abbeele AD. Revised RECIST guideline version 1.1: What oncologists want to know and what radiologists need to know. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2010;195(2):281-89. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Dhande AN, Sinai Khandeparkar SG, Joshi AR. Stromal expression of CD10 in breast carcinoma and its correlation with clinicopathological parameters. South Asian J Cancer. 2019;8(1):18-21. PMID: 30766845; PMCID: PMC6348787. Doi: 10.4103/sajc.sajc_56_18. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pmc/articles/PMC6348787/. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Wang Q, Sun L, Yan J. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and caspase-3 in mucinous breast carcinoma and infiltrating ductal carcinoma-not otherwise specified, and the correlation with disease-free survival. Oncol Lett. 2017;14(4):4890-96. Epub 2017 Aug 10. PMID: 29085497; PMCID: PMC5649581. 10.3892/ol.2017.6744. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29085497/. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Kamarudin NA, Abd Shukor N, Farouk WI. Stromal expression of CD10 in invasive breast carcinoma and its association with tumour stage, grade, ER, PR and HER2 status. Malays J Pathol. 2021;43(3):389-96. PMID: 34958060. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34958060/.
21.
Jana SH, Jha BM, Patel C. CD10-A new prognostic stromal marker in breast carcinoma, its utility, limitations and role in breast cancer pathogenesis. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2014;57:530-36. https://www.ijpmonline.org/article.asp?issn= 0377-4929;year=2014;volume=57;issue=4;spage=530;epage=536;aulast=Jana. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Shen S, Xiao G, Du R. Predictors of lymphovascular invasion identified from pathological factors in Chinese patients with breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;9(2):2468-74. PMID: 29416785; PMCID: PMC5788653. 10.18632/ oncotarget.23503. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29416785/. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Chen Z, Xu S, Xu W. Expression of cluster of differentiation 34 and vascular endothelial growth factor in breast cancer, and their prognostic significance. Oncology Letters. 2015:10:723-29. Doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3348. https://www. spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/ol.2015.3348. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Ali HD, Jalal JA, Ismail AT. Stromal CD10 expression in invasive breast carcinoma. Zanco Journal of Medical Sciences (Zanco J Med Sci). 2018;22(1):41-48. Doi: 10.15218/zjms.2018.006. https://zjms.hmu.edu.krd/index.php/zjms/article/view/44. [crossref]
25.
Ruihua T, Yongqiang L, Zongzhu Z. The study of correlation between neo- adjuvant chemotherapy and the expression of VEGF, HIF-1α and MVD in breast cancer. Biomedical Research. 2017;Special Issue):537-41. ISSN:0976-1 683. https://www.alliedacademies.org/articles/the-study-of-correlation-between-neoadjuvant-chemotherapy-and-the-expression-of-vegf-hif1alpha-and-mvd-in-breast-cancer.html.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62235.17833

Date of Submission: Dec 12, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jan 27, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Mar 27, 2023
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 15, 2023
• Manual Googling: Mar 08, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Mar 25, 2023 (5%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com