Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 116068

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : May | Volume : 17 | Issue : 5 | Page : PC28 - PC33 Full Version

Paediatric Appendicitis: Has SARS-COV-2 Influenced the Clinical Profile and Management during the Pandemic Period?


Published: May 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62072.17829
Shinaz Sadiq, MK Binu, UR Maneesha, SV Beena, CS Aravind

1. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Government TD Medical College, Alappuzha, Kerala, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Government Medical College, Calicut, Kerala, India. 4. Professor, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. 5. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
Shinaz Sadiq,
‘Nimitha’, Manthara, Near Chirayil Temple, Edava, PO. Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
E-mail: shinazsadiq@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) had profound repercussions on routine medical practices all over the globe. There are fewer studies on the impact of the pandemic on childhood surgical conditions like Acute Appendicitis (AA), which is the most common paediatric surgical emergency.

Aim: To analyse whether COVID-19 has influenced the clinical profile and management of paediatric appendicitis during the pandemic period.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was carried out in the Department of Paediatric Surgery, SAT Hospital, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India, comparing AA cases during the pandemic period (group A=from February 2020 to January 2022) with AA cases during the prepandemic period (group B=from February 2018 to January 2020). Analysis of data regarding patient demographics (age, sex), duration of symptoms and hospital stay, type of appendicitis, total and differential leucocyte count, ultrasonographic findings, treatment modality and complications was done. Subgroup analysis of children in group A was done by comparing AA cases with active/recent COVID-19 infection (Subgroup A1) with the rest of AA in the group (Subgroup A2). Pearson’s Chi-square test was used for the analysis of categorical variables and independent t-test was used for numerical data. p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: There were 826 AA cases, with 375 children in group A and 451 in group B. A significant reduction in the number of AA cases was noted during the first year of the pandemic (n=167 vs n=242, p-value=0.009) and a significantly higher number of cases were managed conservatively during the pandemic period (n=48 vs n=10, p-value <0.0001). Children with active/recent COVID-19 infection presented late (p-value=0.03), had a significantly higher incidence of complicated appendicitis (p-value=0.02), decreased total leucocyte count (p-value=0.01), decreased polymorph count (p-value=0.02) and higher incidence of the conservative modality of treatment (p-value <0.005).

Conclusion: Overall, there were no significant differences in the clinical profile of AA during the pandemic period. However, children with AA who had active/recent COVID-19 infection had a longer duration of symptoms and a higher incidence of complicated appendicitis. The pandemic influenced the management protocols with an increase in the number of AA cases being managed conservatively when compared to the prepandemic period.

Keywords

Appendectomy, Inflammation, Polymerase chain reaction, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

The last two years, witnessed Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome caused by the novel coronavirus {Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)/COVID-19} pandemic gripping the entire world and disrupting all aspects of life. Changes in routine medical/ surgical practices, reallocation of healthcare resources, fear of the dreaded pandemic, isolation/quarantine measures, and stay-at-home orders could have possibly resulted in delayed treatment seeking for non COVID-19 conditions. The same is particularly true during the rapid surges in COVID-19 cases or ‘waves’ of the COVID-19 pandemic, which often coincided with the nationwide/ regional lockdowns. All over the globe, numerous authors have reported a sudden drop in visits to the Emergency Department (ED) for non COVID-19 emergency conditions, resulting in delayed presentation of such cases (1). In 2020, the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that four out of 10 adults in the United States (US) avoided or delayed medical care because of concerns related to COVID-19, which might potentially have an impact on the clinical course, management and outcome of non COVID-19 conditions (2). This is true from a paediatric perspective as well (3),(4). There have been reports of fewer patients presenting with suspected Acute Appendicitis (AA), increased incidence of complicated appendicitis, higher rate of perforation in paediatric appendicitis, and prolonged hospitalisation for AA during the COVID-19 pandemic period (4),(5). In the prepandemic phase, the incidence of appendicitis has been reported to be 0.94-1 case per 1000 children, with 20% of paediatric appendicitis presenting with perforation (6),(7). However, few other studies report no change in the prevalence or severity of AA during the pandemic period (8). The gastrointestinal manifestations of COVID-19 infection as well as the post-COVID-19 Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) can mimic appendicitis, which adds to the diagnostic and management dilemma.

In January 2020, the southern state of Kerala, India, reported the first case of COVID-19 in India (9). Unlike many other states in the country, Kerala never had a typical wave of the pandemic. Availability of adequate healthcare resources at the grass-root level, better health awareness of the people, and relatively early healthcare seeking behaviour meant that the hospital infrastructure was never overwhelmed, even though it reached near maximum capacity during the peak of the pandemic (10). There is an impression that the clinical pattern of paediatric appendicitis has changed during the pandemic, with decreased number of ED visits and an increase in the number of conservatively managed appendicitis, as well as an increased prevalence of complicated appendicitis during this period with more postoperative complications when compared to the prepandemic phase [5,11]. With this study, authors aimed to find the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the most common paediatric surgical emergency – Acute Appendicitis (AA) in Kerala, India.

Material and Methods

A retrospective study was carried out in the Department of Paediatric Surgery, SAT Hospital, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India, after obtaining Institutional Research Committee approval (A2/SBMR/99/2022/GMCT) and Human Ethics Committee clearance (HEC No. 02/11/2022/MCT) in March 2022. The data collection and analysis were done after obtaining clearance from both committees.

Inclusion criteria: All cases of AA admitted in the Department of Paediatric Surgery, SAT Hospital, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, during the four years from 1st February 2018 to 31st January 2022 were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Children with congenital intra-abdominal anomalies were excluded from the study.

The cases were categorised into: (a) Group A, the two year pandemic period from 01/02/2020 to 31/01/2022 and (b) Group B, the two year prepandemic period from 01/02/2018 to 31/01/2020.

Study Procedure

Appendicitis cases were diagnosed based on history, clinical findings, and investigations (laboratory with or without abdominal ultrasonography). The following data were collected, analysed, and compared between the two groups: (i) patient demographics-age and sex; (ii) duration of symptoms; (iii) duration of hospital stay; (iv) type of appendicitis- simple/complicated appendicitis (12); (v) investigations- total and differential leucocyte count, ultrasound of the abdomen; (vi) treatment provided-conservative/surgical; and (vii) complications encountered. Complicated appendicitis was defined as perforated appendicitis or gangrenous appendicitis or appendicular abscess with features of peritonitis (12).

During the pandemic period (group A), nasopharyngeal swabs were taken from all children to detect the SARS-COV-2 virus and tested with Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR). If faster results for COVID-19 were needed for early surgery of severe appendicitis cases, either TrueNat or Cartridge Based Nucleic Acid Amplification (CBNAAT) tests were done instead of RT-PCR. The tests were also chosen based on institutional availability at that particular point in time. The children in group A were further divided into: (1) Subgroup A1, which included children admitted with appendicitis who had active or recent COVID-19 infection (tested positive for COVID-19 during or within three months prior to hospital admission for appendicitis); (2) Subgroup A2, which included children in group A who were tested negative for COVID-19 infection or had COVID-19 infection more than three months prior to hospital admission for appendicitis. The data for subgroups A1 and A2 were compared.

Statistical Analysis

The data collection and analysis were done using Microsoft Excel and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 26.0 for Windows. In the descriptive analysis, qualitative data were expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD) or as median and range, based on data distribution. Quantitative data were described as absolute and relative frequency. Numerical data fit the normal distribution and independent t-test was used for the comparison of the two groups. Pearson’s Chi-square test was used for the analysis of categorical variables. p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant and p-value <0.001 was considered highly significant.

Results

There were 826 children admitted with suspected AA during this period, with 375 children in group A (pandemic period) and 451 children in group B (prepandemic period). A significant reduction in the number of appendicitis cases was noted in the first year of the pandemic compared to a similar period during the prepandemic phase (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3).

Group A vs Group-B (pandemic vs prepandemic period): There were no significant differences in the demographic data (age, sex), duration of symptoms, and total and differential leucocyte counts between the two groups (Table/Fig 4). During the pandemic period, 48 cases (13%) were managed by conservative/non surgical means, whereas only 10 cases (2%) were managed so during the prepandemic phase (p-value <0.0001) (Table/Fig 5). Group A (pandemic period) had 209 cases (56%) of simple appendicitis and 163 cases (44%) of complicated appendicitis; whereas Group B (prepandemic period) had 272 cases (60%) of simple appendicitis and 178 cases (40%) of complicated appendicitis (Table/Fig 6),(Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8). The postoperative complication rates were comparable between the two groups (Table/Fig 9).

Subgroup Analysis of group A comparing children with active/recent COVID-19 infection (Subgroup A1) vs the rest (Subgroup A2)-showed a significant delay in presentation (increased duration of symptoms) in Subgroup A1. Similarly, a significant increase in complicated appendicitis and a decrease in the total leucocyte and polymorph count were noted in Subgroup A1 (Table/Fig 10).

There were four cases of suspected appendicitis, managed surgically, which had an alternate diagnosis, three in group A (one case of Meckel’s diverticulitis and two cases of MIS-C) and one in group B (case of an ileocaecal mass lesion) (Table/Fig 6). In addition to this, during the pandemic period, 12 cases were referred from peripheral centers as suspected AA. But clinically, since these cases were not suggestive of appendicitis, they were admitted to the Paediatric Medical Ward. On evaluation, the cases had features of MIS-C and were treated accordingly. These 12 cases were not included in this study.

Discussion

Acute Appendicitis (AA), the most common emergency surgical condition in children retained the status during the COVID-19 pandemic period as well (5),(11). SARS-CoV-2 was first detected late in 2019 and the COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organisation (WHO) on 11 March 2020 (13). The global pandemic resulted in fears about hospitalisation, a chance for cross-infection, prolonged stay in the ED, delays in treatment due to disease control measures, and other logistical restrictions. These factors had a significant impact on most non COVID-19 conditions like AA with possible adverse outcomes (14).

In a study published in 2021, which was based on 118 paediatric appendicitis in Turkey, Ulusoy O et al., reported that there was a 31% decrease in the number of AA cases during the pandemic period (5). A large retrospective multicentre study done in Israel by Tankel et al., in 2019-2020 on 519 adult appendicitis, demonstrated a significant reduction in the number of AA cases during the pandemic period and the authors consider the reason for the same to be a successful treatment of appendicitis by conservative/ non surgical measures on an outpatient basis at home (15). La Pergola et al. conducted an Italian multicentre study in 2020 and noticed a reducing trend in the number of appendicitis in the very high pandemic diffusion areas, but the results were not significant (8). Authors found a significant reduction in AA during the first year of the pandemic. The numbers reached prepandemic levels during the second year of the pandemic, even though Kerala had comparatively larger COVID-19 waves during this period. Once the fear and apprehension of the pandemic decreased along with the relaxation of lockdown and quarantine measures, the population and healthcare system adapted to the ‘new normal’.

Various studies report that prolonged duration of symptoms and delayed presentation to the Emergency Department results in an increased incidence of complicated appendicitis cases, increased duration of hospital stay, and higher complication rates due to appendicitis (5),(16),(17),(18). A retrospective study of 118 patients done by Ulusoy O et al., found that during the pandemic period, the incidence of complicated appendicitis increased from 14% to 33%, and hospital stay was prolonged by 44% (5). Yet another study conducted in Israel, based on 161 cases from three medical centers in 2020, Snapiri O et al., show an increase in complication rates from 11% in the prepandemic period to 22% in the pandemic period (16). Place R et al., found that perforated appendicitis increased from 19% during the prepandemic period to 39% during the pandemic period in a study conducted in North Virginia, US in 2020 (4). The reason for this increase is presumed to be due to the prolonged duration of symptoms and delay in presentation caused by the stay-at-home orders, isolation/quarantine measures, and fear of COVID-19 contamination in hospitals (5). On the contrary, Percul C et al., found no significant increase in complicated appendicitis during the pandemic period in a study conducted in Argentina in 2021 (19). Similarly, authors found no significant difference in the duration of symptoms, complicated appendicitis, complications related to appendicitis, or the duration of hospital stay. However, authors found a significant delay in presentation and an increase in complicated appendicitis among children with active/recent COVID-19 infection when compared with the rest of the study group during the pandemic period (Table/Fig 11) (5),(17).

Classic diagnostic methods in diagnosing appendicitis include history, clinical examination, and laboratory analysis. Radiological imaging and scoring systems are used based on individual cases and institutional protocols. Ulusoy O et al., report that the diagnostic sensitivity of USS was higher during the pandemic period (84%) and secondary findings of appendicitis like appendicoliths, free fluid, and periappendiceal fat stranding increased during this period (5). And similar results were found in the present study as well. Tullie L et al., recommended routine ultrasound imaging in children with suspected appendicitis, as terminal ileitis which can be a manifestation of COVID-19 can mimic appendicitis and the same can be managed with non operative means (20). In a United Kingdom (UK) study on 172 cases of AA by Sheath C et al., found significantly higher inflammatory markers (total leucocyte count and C-reactive protein) in the pandemic period (17). Authors did not find a similar increase during the pandemic period. However, the total leucocyte count and polymorph counts were significantly lower in the subgroup of children with AA who had active or recent COVID-19, when compared with the rest.

The pandemic, COVID-19 turned out to be a major decision making factor in the management of paediatric AA. Children with active COVID-19 infection often presented with gastrointestinal symptoms like abdominal pain, diarrhoea, ileus, mesenteric adenopathy with terminal ileitis mimicking appendicitis (pseudoappendicitis) and a surgical abdomen with or without very minimal flu symptoms (14),(21),(22),(23),(24),(25),(26),(27). Paediatric COVID-19 infection can cause shock, fever, dysregulated immune response with host tissue damage, and hyperinflammation resulting in MIS-C. The CDC issued a case definition for MIS-C including a severe illness requiring hospitalisation in individuals <21 years of age and presenting with fever for ≥24 hours, laboratory evidence of inflammation, multisystem (≥2) organ involvement, and a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection or exposure within four weeks prior to the onset of symptoms. Children with MIS-C most often require intensive care, as many of them develop multi-organ dysfunction, with gastrointestinal (92-95%) and cardio-vascular (80%) being the most common systems affected (28),(29). Malhotra A et al., suggest the possibility that paediatric appendicitis could be a ‘Gut reaction’ (hyper-inflammatory complication) of COVID-19 infection (24). It has been postulated that COVID-19 may cause AA by: (i) causing lymphoid hyperplasia leading to inflammation and ischemia; (ii) Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme receptor-2 (ACE-2 receptor), which is the functional receptor for COVID-19 is expressed in the glandular cells of the appendix as with other areas of the gut (30),(31). The present study had two cases operated for suspected appendicitis which had no features of appendicitis peroperatively and further evaluation proved the diagnosis to be MIS-C. As awareness of the condition increased and with focused evaluation, the authors were able to correctly diagnose 12 cases of MIS-C, which were originally referred to us as suspected AA for surgical management.

Appendectomy is the classical standard treatment of choice for AA. However, conservative management with antibiotics has gained popularity in recent years, especially following reports of successful medical treatment of simple appendicitis in adults (32),(33),(34). Even though evidence for the same is limited in the paediatric population, there has been a recent shift towards conservative/ non surgical treatment for non complicated appendicitis (14),(17),(35),(36). This trend is much more evident and has particular significance during the pandemic phase and even beyond. These factors possibly influenced decision making in suspected appendicitis cases, and hence the relatively significant increase in the number of conservatively managed cases of suspected appendicitis during the pandemic phase in the present study as well.

Limitation(s)

This is a single-institution study and was done retrospectively. A multi-institutional prospective study should provide a more accurate analysis.

Conclusion

Globally, the pandemic affected all aspects of health services, with a significant decrease in the number of cases in the Paediatric Emergency Department as was evident from the lower number of paediatric appendicitis cases during the first year of the pandemic. Even though there was no overall delay in the presentation of appendicitis or increase in complications between the pandemic phase and prepandemic phase, children affected with recent/active COVID-19 infection presented late to the surgeon. Similarly, complicated appendicitis cases were significantly higher in children with recent/active COVID-19 infection, when compared to other children during the pandemic phase. The pandemic had an impact on management protocols, with conservative treatment gaining popularity in children with uncomplicated appendicitis.

References

1.
COVID-19 patients in times of pandemic: Emergency department visits, hospitalizations and cause-specific mortality in Northern Italy. Manzoli L, editor. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(3):e0248995. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Czeisler MÉ, Marynak K, Clarke KEN, Salah Z, Shakya I, Thierry JM, et al. Delay or avoidance of medical care because of COVID-19-related concerns — United States, June 2020. 2020;69(36):8. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Lazzerini M, Barbi E, Apicella A, Marchetti F, Cardinale F, Trobia G. Delayed access or provision of care in Italy resulting from fear of COVID-19. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. 2020;4(5):e10-11. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Place R, Lee J, Howell J. Rate of pediatric appendiceal perforation at a children’s hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with the previous year. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(12):e2027948. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Ulusoy O, Karakus¸ OZ, Ates¸ O, Aydin E, Hakgüder G, Olguner M, et al. Paediatric appendicitis management during the COVID-19 pandemic: What has changed? CAYD. 2021;8(2):109-13. [crossref]
6.
Aarabi S, Sidhwa F, Riehle KJ, Chen Q, Mooney DP. Pediatric appendicitis in New England: Epidemiology and outcomes. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(6):1106-14. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Chandrashekar S, Lokesh MG, Avinash SR. Prevalence of perforated appendicitis and its determinants in pediatric appendicitis patients admitted in tertiary care centre, South India: A cross sectional study. Int Surg J. 2018;5(12):3926. [crossref]
8.
La Pergola E, Sgrò A, Rebosio F, Vavassori D, Fava G, Codrich D, et al. Appendicitis in children in a large Italian COVID-19 pandemic area. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:600320. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Andrews M, Areekal B, Rajesh K, Krishnan J, Suryakala R, Krishnan B, et al. First confirmed case of COVID-19 infection in India: A case report. Indian J Med Res. 2020;151(5):490. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Thiagarajan K. COVID-19: How Kerala kept itself above water in India’s devastating second wave. BMJ. 2021;n2005. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1990;132(5):910-25. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Bom WJ, Scheijmans JCG, Salminen P, Boermeester MA. Diagnosis of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis in adults. Scand J Surg. 2021;110(2):170-79. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO Declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parmensis. 2020;91(1):157-60.
14.
Engelis A, Smane L, Pavare J, Zviedre A, Zurmutai T, Berezovska MM, et al. Case series of variable acute appendicitis in children with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Children. 2021;8(12):1207. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Tankel J, Keinan A, Blich O, Koussa M, Helou B, Shay S, et al. The decreasing incidence of acute appendicitis during COVID-19: A retrospective multi-centre study. World J Surg. 2020;44(8):2458-63. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Snapiri O, Rosenberg Danziger C, Krause I, Kravarusic D, Yulevich A, Balla U, et al. Delayed diagnosis of paediatric appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Acta Paediatr. 2020;109(8):1672-76. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Sheath C, Abdelrahman M, MacCormick A, Chan D. Paediatric appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Paediatr Child Health. 2021;57(7):986-89. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Pawelczyk A, Kowalska M, Tylicka M, Koper-Lenkiewicz OM, Komarowska MD, Hermanowicz A, et al. Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the course and treatment of appendicitis in the pediatric population. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):23999. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Percul C, Cruz M, Curiel Meza A, González G, Lerendegui L, Malzone MC, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the pediatric population with acute appendicitis: Experience at a general, tertiary care hospital. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2021;119(4):224-29. [crossref]
20.
Tullie L, Ford K, Bisharat M, Watson T, Thakkar H, Mullassery D, et al. Gastrointestinal features in children with COVID-19: An observation of varied presentation in eight children. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. 2020;4(7):e19-20. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Ashcroft J, Hudson VE, Davies RJ. COVID-19 gastrointestinal symptoms mimicking surgical presentations. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2020;56:108-09. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Moradveisi B, Ataee P, Ghaffarieh A, Karimi A, Fattahi N, Nasseri K. Diarrhea as a presenting symptom of coronavirus disease 2019 in children. Adv Biomed Res. 2020;9(1):35. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Tian Y, Rong L, Nian W, He Y. Review article: Gastrointestinal features in COVID-19 and the possibility of faecal transmission. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020;51(9):843-51. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Malhotra A, Sturgill M, Whitley-Williams P, Lee YH, Esochaghi C, Rajasekhar H, et al. Pediatric COVID-19 and appendicitis: A gut reaction to SARS-CoV-2? Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 2021;40(2):e49-55. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Suwanwongse K, Shabarek N. Pseudo-appendicitis in an adolescent with COVID-19. Cureus [Internet]. 2020;12(7):e9394. [crossref]
26.
Suresh Kumar VC, Mukherjee S, Harne PS, Subedi A, Ganapathy MK, Patthipati VS, et al. Novelty in the gut: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the gastrointestinal manifestations of COVID-19. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020;7(1):e000417. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Alotaibi MA, Alhumaidan W, Alotaibi A, Alotaibi AM. Pediatric appendicitis in times of COVID-19: Think MIS-C. Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports. 2022;77:102151. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Feldstein LR, Rose EB, Horwitz SM, Collins JP, Newhams MM, Son MBF, et al. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in U.S. Children and Adolescents. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(4):334-46. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Meshaka R, Whittam FC, Guessoum M, Eleti S, Shelmerdine SC, Arthurs OJ, et al. Abdominal US in pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome associated with SARS-CoV-2 (PIMS-TS). Radiology. 2022;303(1):173-81.[crossref][PubMed]
30.
Nurullayev E, Gördü B, Özsürekçi Y, Haliloglu M, Soyer T. Acute appendicitis during the clinical course of COVID-19 in a 13-year-old boy: Complication or coincidental? Surgical Practice. 2021;25(4):232-34. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Segal JP, Mak JWY, Mullish BH, Alexander JL, Ng SC, Marchesi JR. The gut microbiome: An under-recognised contributor to the COVID-19 pandemic? Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020;13:1756284820974914. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Salminen P, Tuominen R, Paajanen H, Rautio T, Nordström P, Aarnio M, et al. Five-year follow-up of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in the APPAC randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320(12):1259. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Javanmard-Emamghissi H, Boyd-Carson H, Hollyman M, Doleman B, Adiamah A, Lund JN, et al. The management of adult appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic: An interim analysis of a UK cohort study. Tech Coloproctol [Internet]. 2021;25(4):401-11. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Podda M, Gerardi C, Cillara N, Fearnhead N, Gomes CA, Birindelli A, et al. Antibiotic treatment and appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in adults and children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Surgery. 2019;270(6):1028-40. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Ielpo B, Podda M, Pellino G, Pata F, Caruso R, Gravante G, et al. Global attitudes in the management of acute appendicitis during COVID-19 pandemic: ACIE Appy Study. Br J Surg. 2021;108(6):717-26. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Jones BA, Slater BJ. Non operative management of acute appendicitis in a pediatric patient with concomitant COVID-19 infection. Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports. 2020;59:101512.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62072.17829

Date of Submission: Dec 05, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Feb 28, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Apr 01, 2023
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 07, 2022
• Manual Googling: Feb 14, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Mar 31, 2023 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com