Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 76157

AbstractConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2023 | Month : May | Volume : 17 | Issue : 5 | Page : OE01 - OE04 Full Version

Faecal Microbiota Transplant: A New Biologic Frontier in Medicine


Published: May 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/59214.17737
Ankita Thakur, Sourya Acharya, Samarth Shukla

1. MBBS Student, Department of Internal Medicine, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed To Be University), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Internal Medicine, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed To Be University), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor, Department of Pathology, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed To Be University), Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Ankita Thakur,
JNMC, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed to be University), Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: ankitathakur0111@gmail.com

Abstract

Faecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) refers to the process of introducing the gut microbiome into a compromised patient’s Gastrointestinal (GI) tract after obtaining it from a healthy donor. It is one of the chief treatment options for people afflicted with a chronic Clostridium difficile infection. Recently, other possible applications of FMT have been gaining worldwide attention as an emerging approach to treating a multitude of disorders, such as metabolic syndrome, neurological diseases like autism, Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), and so on. FMT is not currently being used in clinical practice due to practical objections, though research on how to overcome the these is ongoing. This article seeks to explore FMT as a procedure, its current indications and the results from various studies, applications of FMT as a course of treatment in other diseases, and the limitations that the procedure poses for the same, upon which further studies can commence, and advancements can be made in the field of medicine.

Keywords

Autism, Metabolic syndrome, Microbiome, Pseudomembranous colitis

The Faecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) refers to a procedure that involves obtaining a filtrate of liquid faeces from a carefully screened donor and introducing it into the recipient’s GI tract to cure certain diseases. The suspension can be administered via a naso-duodenal/gastric tube, enema, capsule, or colonoscope. The main application for the procedure is the treatment of Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection (RCDI), which has a high success rate. Additionally, FMT is being considered as a possible treatment for several other disorders, including IBD, obesity, metabolic and neuropsychiatric disorders such as autism, cancer, and so on (1). The procedure is suitable for children and adults (2).

The idea of faecal transplantations originated in China in the 4th century, where cases of severe diarrhea and food poisoning were treated with the ‘yellow soup’. By the 16th century, several products of faecal origin were available in China to relieve Gastrointestinal (GI) and systemic symptoms such as pain and fever (3). It wasn’t until the 1950s that FMT as a procedure was applied to treat RCDI (4). The first published research on FMT demonstrated the use of faecal enemas in antibiotic-induced pseudomembranous colitis as an adjunct. It is now an accepted therapy for RCDI treatment (5).

The Gut Microbiota

The microbiome is a collective term used to refer to the diverse microbial lifeforms that inhabit the gut and the web of effects they produce in the body (6). Thus, the gut microbiota is diverse in composition, comprising microorganisms in the GI tract ranging in trillions. After the introduction and multiplication of these organisms in the gut at birth, nutritional, genetic, and environmental factors modify it throughout life (7).

The microbiota plays a major role in developing the enteral layout and mucosal immune system and overseeing their regulation. It also plays a significant role in processes such as digestion, assimilation, metabolism, and production of vitamins in the body. Recent studies have also discovered the significant bidirectional influence of the gut and nervous system on each other, termed the microbiota-gut-brain axis (8),(9),(10).

A disbalance in the composition of the gut microbiome is brought on by factors such as stress, diet, genetics, and antibiotic therapy (11). It can lead to a pro-inflammatory state that can, in turn, lead to many diseases.

Principle of FMT

The normal composition and functioning of the gut microbial flora are essential for the host’s health. Any disruption in the same can lead to dysbiosis characterised by an increase in the number and decrease in the diversity of the flora. With the most common causal agent being antibiotics, a Clostridium difficile infestation thrives in the dysbiotic environment and causes an infection (12). FMT opts to reintroduce the normal flora of the gut, collected from a healthy donor and restores the balance of the recipient’s gut flora.

PROCEDURE

Selecting the Donor

Factually, anyone over the age of 18 years can be a donor and can be the recipient’s friend, family, spouse, or even a stranger. But typically, family members, especially first-degree relatives of the maternal line are preferred to share most of the recipient’s microbiome. Significantly, others are also preferred since they share common environmental risk factors (1). Clinical approach for FMT is depected in (Table/Fig 1).

Stool Collection and FMT Preparation

• The passed stool should ideally be used as soon as it is expelled, preferably in the first six hours. In cases of delay, it should be chilled, rather than frozen. General precautions such as handling the transfusion material with gloves, masks with an eye shield, and a fluid-resistant gown.
• The stool sample is diluted with 4% milk or normal saline for intravenous injection. A conventional household blender can be used for the same. Following this, the stool should be homogenous with a slurry, liquid consistency (13).
• The slurry should be filtered to get rid of all particulate matter and the finished product should be used instantly.
• Large inter-institutional variations have been observed in the preparation of FMT such as some institutes giving high-dose doxycycline to patients with FMT to decrease the dysbiotic flora. Others give patients a polyethylene glycol preparation to patients before FMT to increase the chances of proper colonisation of the transplanted flora into the recipient’s gut (14).

Administration of Sample

Three delivery pathways are used to deliver FMT:

• The upper gut delivery: intake of oral capsules
• The mid-gut delivery: use of nasogastric and nasoduodenal tubes and endoscopic channels
• The lower gut delivery: via coloscopies, enemas, infusions, and transendoscopic enteral tubing (under trial) (15).

Although statistically, there has been no difference in the outcome of the procedure due to the route of administration, it is wise to consider the associated potential risks with each of the methods (16).

Evaluation of Success

Primary outcome is evaluated by the resolution of symptoms due to gut dysbiosis and secondary outcome by absence of relapse eight weeks after the procedure (17).

Safety and Side-effects

FMT has a few immediate side-effects such as abdominal discomfort, low-grade fever, flatulence, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation and complications of sedation and endoscopy (rare) (18).These symptoms run a course of 2 days and are self-limited. However, the long-term effects of FMT are still a mystery, and information on the same is needed. There are concerns revolving around the ‘do-it-yourself’ approach of FMT, with done without medical assistance may potentially have adverse consequences (1). Another study reported two cases in which, following the transplant, bacteremia was induced by a transmitted organism. These patients had existing co-morbidities which increased their subsequent risk for bacteremia (19).

Due to the high chances of disease transmission, researchers are keen to find an alternative to FMT despite its effectiveness.

Indications of FMT

Current indication is recurrent pseudomembranous colitis. Other potential indications include Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), IBD, metabolic syndrome, autism, cancer, multidrug-resistant organism infection, Multiple Sclerosis (MS), and other autoimmune disorders (20).

1) Pseudomembranous colitis

Caused by the notorious bacterium, Clostridium difficile, Pseudomembranous colitis is one of the most commonly acquired 2HAIs and poses a major healthcare problem. According to a research done in Mumbai, India has a prevalence rate that ranges from 7.1-26.6% with a much lower incidence of fulminant infections in comparison to the western countries (21).

C.difficile infection in itself isn’t an indication of FMT. It is performed only in cases of:

• Multiple recurrent infections
• Moderate infection with no response to therapy for atleast a week
• Severe infection with no response to therapy for 48 hours

Patients with RCDI have been found to have a dysbiosis of their gut flora, with a decrease in bacterial diversity, which accounts for such high recurrence rates despite initial treatment with antibiotics. Hence, infusion with the donor faeces restores the normal flora of the gut and strengthens the host defence against recurrent CDI. It also increases the Bacteroidetes species and clostridial (22).

The first FMT clinical trial included 43 patients that were given 14 days of FMT via naso-intestinal tubes along with oral vancomycin, followed by oral vancomycin alone and another 14 days with vancomycin coupled with gastric lavage. Symptoms resolved in 81% of patients receiving FMT, 31% of whom were on vancomycin only and another 23% received vancomycin plus gastric lavage (1). This could be because antibiotic therapy doesn’t restore the imbalanced gut microbiota whereas reintroduction of normal flora via FMT does.

FMT has now been adopted as an accepted regimen for treating recurrent CDI since Eisenman’s experiment. A recent study conducted in Taiwan had an overall success rate of 91.7% for recurrent clostridial infections (23). It generally has a lasting effect with almost no side-effects even among vulnerable patients (24).

2) Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)

The IBS is a recurrent GI disorder with a chronic course affecting about 9-23% of people worldwide, typically manifesting as pain or discomfort in the abdomen with changes in stool consistency, that are eased by defecation (25).

A possible trigger for the condition can be dysbiosis of the gut since a study found a decrease in Lactobacillus and Veillonella in diarrhea and constipation predominating IBS, respectively (26). These are also implicated in bringing about changes in the permeability and mobility of the intestine, triggering inflammation and altering the Quality of Life (27).

Studies conducted in the past do not draw a definitive relation between the application of FMT and IBS. But recently, a randomised trial conducted in Belgium noted a decrease in the symptoms of IBS in 56% of the subjects, though the therapeutic effect subsided after a month. But it was also reported that there was restoration of response in these subjects, after a second dose of FMT (28).

3) Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)

The IBD is an immune-mediated disease of chronic course that includes Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (15).

Factors likely to influence its course include genetics, environmental factors, and dysbiosis of the gut, in which the normal flora is greatly diminished and have lower proportions of normally dominant flora, bacteriodetes, and firmicutes. Corticosteroids, being among the chief lines of treatment for IBD, are not usually recommended for their maintenance therapy and have limited effectiveness on relapse (29).

The FMT seeks to restore the normal flora of the gut and could be possibly therapeutic in IBD but its application remains highly controversial, its efficacy unestablished. A recent holistic therapy ‘step up FMT strategy’ has been seen to be beneficial to steroid-dependent IBD patients. For these patients, while the first transfusion showed little to no effect, a clinical improvement has been seen after a repeated FMT-corticosteroid therapy following a singular one. Thus, a combination of FMT and steroid therapy constitutes the step-up FMT strategy’ and has shown to induce improvement in 57.1% of patients with the disease who were treated using this strategy (15). Another systematic review for FMT in IBD noted a cure rate of only 45%. These variations in the findings put a question mark on the effect of FMT in IBD (30).

4) Metabolic syndrome

Metabolic syndrome refers to a group of conditions that include dyslipidemia, high BP, increase in abdominal girth, and insulin resistance, and may lead to type 2 DM. It has become one of the leading global health problems with its prevalence reaching epidemic proportions (31).

The pathogenesis implicates an impaired function of the gut barrier causing leakage of the bacterias into the system that leads to low-grade exo-toxemia and stimulates the inflammatory cascade, leading to macrophage influx, causing low-grade inflammation of the body and insulin resistance. Specific changes in the microbiota have also been noted in metabolic syndrome with an increase in harmful bacteria such as Prevotella copri and Bacteroides vulgatus with a simultaneous decrease in beneficial bacteria such as Akkermansia municiphila, and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, that increase the insulin sensitivity (16).

An attempt to increase these beneficial bacterias in the gut is done by using an anaerobic preparation to increase the viability and chances of acceptance of these strict anaerobes by the recipient. Due to limited research in the field, the efficacy of the anaerobic preparation, varying effect of routes of administration, and the dose and duration of FMT have not yet been elucidated (17).

5) Autism

Autism is a primary Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) which, in itself, comprises a multitude of developmental neuro-behavioural disorders that are marked by restrictions and repetitions in behaviour, impairment in social interaction and communication; The involvement of gut microbiota in its pathogenesis has been widely studied in animal models by drawing comparisons between the microbiota of an affected and a healthy individual and observing changes in behaviour after the procedure (32). Autistic children show an imbalance in their gut flora with an increase in the number of gut commensals such as Bifidobacterium, Prevotella, Lactobacillus, Bacteroidetes, Ruminococcus genera, Sutterella, and Alcaligenaceae family (8).

Standard treatment for ASD comprises social and speech therapy, behavioural therapy, and dietary interventions but there is still no approved medical therapy for the same. Taking into account the microbiota-gut-brain axis, reintroducing normal flora into the recipient may be a possible therapeutic option. A case study with 18 participants with ASD was done and notable improvements were seen in the behavioural and GI symptoms, compared to the beginning of the trial (33).

6) Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

The MS is an autoimmune disorder characterised by the demyelination of the CNS, affecting about 2.5 million people worldwide, with a female predominance (34). It has multifactorial pathogenesis characterised by disruption of the GBA leading to altered microbiota composition, permeability, and motility of the gut and functions of both enteric and endocrine NS functions.

The FMT has been considered a possible course of therapy for the disease, restoring the normal flora of the gut. In a study conducted with a patient receiving FMTs from five donors daily, an increase in the F.prusnitzii in the gut was seen, along with increased butyrate, propionate, and a decrease in cytokine-mediated inflammation, following the transplant. A change for the better was also seen in his walking and balance. Another study with three MS patients receiving FMT every day for 2 weeks showed a resolution in symptoms for 2-15 years (35).

7) Cancer

Various studies have found associations between dysbiosis of the gut and various cancers [36-38]. A striking difference is seen in the microbiota of a cancer patient and a healthy one which can be used to deduce the potential as prognostic and diagnostic markers of certain microbial pathogens in cancer progression. Dysbiosis has been known to activate certain tumorigenic pathways that lead to inflammation and damage to the host DNA. It has also been linked with the progression of cancer in various tissues such as hepatocellular, gastric, pancreatic, colorectal, melanoma, and breast (11).

Important clinical responses such as anti-PD-1 monoclonal Abs survival time have a positive correlation with the quantity of Akkermansia in the gut. Clinical trials have been conducted with cancer patients responding to immunotherapy, where patients were given oral supplements of Akkermansia and an improvement in the effectiveness of the immunotherapy was seen. By integrating the two, a beneficial treatment of cancer may emerge and FMT may prove to deliver promising therapeutic and diagnostic strategies (11).

• Multidrug-Resistant Organism Infection

The gut is host to many multidrug-resistant organisms, especially after an aggressive course of antibiotics or a prolonged stay in the hospital. While in most people, this doesn’t lead to a symptomatic presentation, infections were precipitated in the vulnerable population compromising immunocompromised patients, children and elderly, travellers, and patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (39).

Most non medicated approaches to combat these infections are focused on replacing the pathogenic bacteria with beneficial gut flora and restructuring the gut with a healthy microbiome.

A case study with 20 people conducted in France showed that, 14 days after receiving FMT, 80% of people had overcome Acinetobacter colonisation. Another study with 8 people showed an 87% decolonisation of VRE in a span of three months (39). Given the results, FMT needs to be explored as an option to combat hospital-centered outbreaks. However, case studies with a larger sample population are needed before conclusive claims can be made.

Summary

Having been successfully applied in the treatment of RCDI, more research is needed to clearly define the role and extent of dysbiosis in these conditions to gain a better insight into the complex changes that follow FMT, within the gut flora and clinical trials of high-quality with large sample groups focusing on the mechanisms via which the gut bacteria influence the host’s defence system are required for the same (39).

Conclusion

The article emphasises the importance of a normally functioning gut microbiome in maintaining an individual’s health and the extensive influence it has on the rest of the body. This article underlines the emergence of FMT as an alternative therapeutic approach in numerous conditions that were previously tackled mostly with pharmacotherapy. The last decade has seen a remarkable change concerning FMT, which has gone from being considered an evidence-free, alternative form of medicine to a considerable therapeutic option with wide application. With growing recognition of the effect of the gut, not only on the nervous system but also on the overall health of the organism, it becomes essential to explore the therapeutic benefits this procedure has to offer. The current data on the same isn’t sufficient for FMT to be considered an FDA-approved procedure, and naturally, a lot of research is needed before it can be put to use to its full potential. Being a possible gold procedure for treatment, studies on the same would go a long way in making advancements in the field of medicine. Furthermore, research on the dose and route of delivery of the FMT, along with their advantages and setbacks, is also essential before considering it as a promising therapeutic strategy for the future.

References

1.
Choi HH, Cho YS. Fecal microbiota transplantation: Current applications, effectiveness, and future perspectives. Clin Endosc. 2016;49(3):257-65. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Fecal Transplant | Johns Hopkins Medicine [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/treatment-tests-and-therapies/fecal-transplant.
3.
Zhang F, Luo W, Shi Y, Fan Z, Ji G. Should we standardize the 1,700-year-old fecal microbiota transplantation? Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(11):1755. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Baron TH, Kozarek RA. Fecal microbiota transplant: We know its history, but can we predict its future? Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2013;88(8):782-85. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Eiseman B, Silen W, Bascom GS, Kauvar AJ. Fecal enema as an adjunct in the treatment of pseudomembranous enterocolitis. Surgery. 1958;44(5):854-59.
6.
Hanssen NMJ, de Vos WM, Nieuwdorp M. Fecal microbiota transplantation in human metabolic diseases: From a murky past to a bright future? Cell Metab. 2021;33(6):1098-110. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Gomaa EZ. Human gut microbiota/microbiome in health and diseases: A review. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2020;113(12):2019-40. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Hughes HK, Rose D, Ashwood P. The gut microbiota and dysbiosis in autism spectrum disorders. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018;18(11):81. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
The gut-brain axis: Interactions between enteric microbiota, central and enteric nervous systems-PMC [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 13]. Available from: https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4367209/.
10.
Appleton J. The gut-brain axis: Influence of microbiota on mood and mental health. Integr Med (Encinitas). 2018;17(4):28-32.
11.
Chen D, Wu J, Jin D, Wang B, Cao H. Fecal microbiota transplantation in cancer management: Current status and perspectives. Int J Cancer. 2019;145(8):2021-31. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Liubakka A, Vaughn BP. Clostridium difficile infection and fecal microbiota transplant. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2016;27(3):324-37. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Wang ZK, Yang YS, Chen Y, Yuan J, Sun G, Peng LH. Intestinal microbiota pathogenesis and fecal microbiota transplantation for inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(40):14805-20. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Fecal microbiota transplantation in relapsing Clostridium difficile infection-PMC [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 13]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pmc/articles/PMC3491681/.
15.
Cui B, Li P, Xu L, Peng Z, Xiang J, He Z, et al. Step-up fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) strategy. Gut Microbes. 2016;7(4):323-28. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Greenberg SA, Youngster I, Cohen NA, Livovsky DM, Strahilevitz J, Israeli E, et al. Five years of fecal microbiota transplantation-an update of the Israeli experience. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(47):5403-14. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Hvas CL, Dahl Jørgensen SM, Jørgensen SP, Storgaard M, Lemming L, Hansen MM, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation is superior to fidaxomicin for treatment of recurrent clostridium difficile infection. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(5):1324-32.e3. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Wang S, Xu M, Wang W, Cao X, Piao M, Khan S, et al. Systematic review: Adverse events of fecal microbiota transplantation. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0161174. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
DeFilipp Z, Bloom PP, Torres Soto M, Mansour MK, Sater MRA, Huntley MH, et al. Drug-resistant E.coli bacteremia transmitted by fecal microbiota transplant. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(21):2043-50. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Wang JW, Kuo CH, Kuo FC, Wang YK, Hsu WH, Yu FJ, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation: Review and update. J Formos Med Assoc. 2019;118(1):S23-S31. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Soman R, Sunavala A. Clostridium difficile infection--is it coming at us? Assoc Physicians India. 2012;60:9-10. PMID: 23767195.
22.
van Nood E, Vrieze A, Nieuwdorp M, Fuentes S, Zoetendal EG, de Vos WM, et al. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(5):407-15. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Lee PC, Chang TE, Wang YP, Lee KC, Lin YT, Chiou JJ, et al. Alteration of gut microbial composition associated with the therapeutic efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation in Clostridium difficile infection. J Formos Med Assoc. 2022;121(9):1636-46. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
de Groot PF, Frissen MN, de Clercq NC, Nieuwdorp M. Fecal microbiota transplantation in metabolic syndrome: History, present and future. Gut Microbes. 2017;8(3):253-67. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Radovanovic-Dinic B, Tesic-Rajkovic S, Grgov S, Petrovic G, Zivkovic V. Irritable bowel syndrome- from etiopathogenesis to therapy. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2018;162(1):01-09. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Myneedu K, Deoker A, Schmulson MJ, Bashashati M. Fecal microbiota transplantation in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019;7(8):1033-41. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Canakis A, Haroon M, Weber HC. Irritable bowel syndrome and gut microbiota. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2020;27(1):28-35. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Holvoet T, Joossens M, Vázquez-Castellanos JF, Christiaens E, Heyerick L, Boelens J, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation reduces symptoms in some patients with irritable bowel syndrome with predominant abdominal bloating: Short- and long-term results from a placebo-controlled randomised trial. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(1):145-57.e8. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Weingarden AR, Vaughn BP. Intestinal microbiota, fecal microbiota transplantation, and inflammatory bowel disease. Gut Microbes. 2017;8(3):238-52. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Colman RJ, Rubin DT. Fecal microbiota transplantation as therapy for inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crohns Colitis. 2014;8(12):1569-81. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Zhang Z, Mocanu V, Cai C, Dang J, Slater L, Deehan EC, et al. Impact of fecal microbiota transplantation on obesity and metabolic syndrome-a systematic review. Nutrients. 2019;11(10):2291. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Srikantha P, Mohajeri MH. The possible role of the microbiota-gut-brain-axis in autism spectrum disorder. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(9):2115. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Kang DW, Adams JB, Coleman DM, Pollard EL, Maldonado J, McDonough- Means S, et al. Long-term benefit of microbiota transfer therapy on autism symptoms and gut microbiota. Sci Rep. 2019;9:5821. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Schepici G, Silvestro S, Bramanti P, Mazzon E. The gut microbiota in multiple sclerosis: An overview of clinical trials. Cell Transplant. 2019;28(12):1507-27. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Ghezzi L, Cantoni C, Pinget GV, Zhou Y, Piccio L. Targeting the gut to treat multiple sclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2021;131(13):e143774. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Sheflin AM, Whitney AK, Weir TL. Cancer-promoting effects of microbial dysbiosis. Curr Oncol Rep. 2014;16(10):406. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Carding S, Verbeke K, Vipond DT, Corfe BM, Owen LJ. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota in disease. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2015;26:26191. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Fan X, Jin Y, Chen G, Ma X, Zhang L. Gut microbiota dysbiosis drives the development of colorectal cancer. DIG. 2021;102(4):508-15. [crossref][PubMed]
39.
Feehan A, Garcia-Diaz J. Bacterial, gut microbiome-modifying therapies to defend against multidrug resistant organisms. Microorganisms. 2020;8(2):166.[crossref][PubMed]

Tables and Figures
[Table / Fig - 1]
DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/59214.17737

Date of Submission: Jul 21, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Oct 28, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Nov 25, 2022
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? NA
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 24, 2022
• Manual Googling: Nov 17, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Nov 24, 2022 (2%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com