Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 82636

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2023 | Month : May | Volume : 17 | Issue : 5 | Page : OD05 - OD07 Full Version

Endobronchial Small Cell Lung Cancer Masquerading as Carcinoid Tumour in a Young Female: A Case Report


Published: May 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63386.17926
Mrinmayee Vijay Mayekar, Pankaj Wagh, Babaji Ghewade, Ulhas Jadhav

1. Junior Resident, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, DMIHER, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, DMIHER, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, DMIHER, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 4. Professor and Guide, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, DMIHER, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Mrinmayee Vijay Mayekar,
101, Jai Gurudev CHS, Plot 6, Sector 1, Sanpada, Navi Mumbai, Wardha-400705, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: m.mayekar94@gmail.com

Abstract

Bronchial Carcinoid Tumours, also known as BCTs, are remarkable neuroendocrine malignancies that can denature chemical compounds with biological activity. The phrase “bronchial adenomas” was once used to refer to BCTs; however, this nomenclature is no longer utilised because BCTs are neither glandular nor invariably benign. Instead, the term “Bronchial Cystic Tumours” is used to refer to BCTs in this context. They are normally a neoplasm that expands slowly and displays a variety of behaviours, yet they are also capable of expanding rapidly and being significantly more aggressive in general. Despite the fact that smoking is a significant risk factor for Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC), which is a more severe form of lung cancer than carcinoid, surgery is still the treatment of choice for carcinoid tumours, while chemoradiation and chemotherapy are the only options for patients with stage four SCLC. Here, the authors discuss the case of a 30-year-old young female patient who was erroneously diagnosed with endobronchial carcinoid, which turned out to be SCLC. Because of the significant connection between smoking and SCLC, malignancies are not usually seen in young females. The relevant patient’s investigations were consistent with small cell carcinoma of the lung. Immunohistochemistry for CD56 and synaptophysin turned out to be positive. The patient received six cycles of chemotherapy with an injection of Cisplatin and an injection of Etoposide every three weeks. She was followed-up after three months and did have symptomatic relief.

Keywords

Bronchial carcinoid tumours, Surgical pathology, Typical carcinoid

Case Report

A 30-year-old non-smoking female patient presented with primary complaints of blood-tinged sputum and cough with occasional mucoid expectoration on and off for five years. She had taken symptomatic treatment in the form of cough syrup and antibiotics. Three months prior, she had a single episode of massive haemoptysis and received an injection of Tranexamic acid, an injection of Ethamsylate, an injection of Vitamin K, and other supportive management at a nearby hospital. She was advised to undergo bronchial artery embolisation but could not do so due to lack of services at that time. She was under observation for five days and discharged as there was no repeat episode of haemoptysis.

Due to the lack of tertiary health care facilities and poor socio-economic factors, nothing much was done for her other than symptomatic management. She did not have any associated co-morbidities. On examination, her general condition was moderate, her pulse rate was 110/minute, respiratory rate was 20/minute, and blood pressure was 110/60 mmHg.

Systemic examination of the respiratory system revealed reduced breath sounds on the right side. Cardiovascular, central nervous system, and per abdominal examination were unremarkable. During the present hospital stay of one month, she developed malaise and high-grade fever. After a thorough assessment, her diagnosis was narrowed to an endobronchial mass likely to be carcinoid or bronchocoele and less likely a malignant lesion. Given her symptoms, she underwent various haematological and radiological investigations, which are further detailed in the report. Her chest X-ray revealed right middle lobe consolidation (Table/Fig 1).

Haematological investigations were unremarkable except for low haemoglobin (9.9 grams%). Liver and kidney function tests were within normal limits (Table/Fig 2). Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) of the thorax suggested right lower lobe collapse with effusion (Table/Fig 3).

Furthermore, a bronchoscopy was done, which revealed an endobronchial vascular mass lesion, as depicted in (Table/Fig 4). A biopsy was taken from the same and sent for histopathological examination, which revealed scattered atypical round blue cells that could be seen forming nests in the fibro-collagenous stroma suggestive of primary epithelial malignancy, as shown in (Table/Fig 4).

The Histopathological Examination (HPE) image of the endobronchial tumour biopsy is shown in (Table/Fig 5).

The patient’s reports were consistent with a small cell carcinoma of the lung. Immunohistochemistry for CD56 and synaptophysin turned out to be positive. The patient was referred for Oncologist’s opinion and she received six cycles of chemotherapy with an injection of Cisplatin and an injection of Etoposide three weekly. She was followed-up after three months and did have symptomatic relief.

Discussion

In India, lung cancer accounts for 5.9% of all cancers and 8.1% of all cancer-related deaths (1). According to demographic data, lung cancer is the second most common cancer leading to death in the United States (2). It is the most common reason for people to die from cancer, regardless of gender. About 25% of all deaths from cancer can be attributed to this factor. The only way to differentiate between two primary lung cancer which are referred to respectively as SCLC and non SCLC (NSCLC). NSCLC accounts for around 85% of lung cancer cases, while SCLC accounts for approximately 15% (2). SCLC is an incredibly rare occurrence to find SCLC in someone who has never smoked. When something like this happens, the diagnosis needs to be meticulously documented with a comprehensive immunohistochemistry study to rule out the possibility of lymphoma, melanoma, or carcinoid. When a diagnosis of SCLC has been established, it is important to take into account the remote but not unheard-of chance of a mixed case of SCLC and adenocarcinoma. In these situations, Epidermal Growth Factor-Receptor (EGF-R) mutations have been identified in an increasing number of case reports, which raises the prospect of treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Kyritsis I et al., carried out a study that was quite similar to the present study (3). In that study, a young, non smoking female patient was diagnosed incorrectly with SCLC.

According to research conducted in the United States, SCLC accounts for 14% of all lung malignancies and over 30,000 new 6cases are identified annually (4). It has despaired that SCLC has a significant connection to Paraneoplastic syndromes express themselves as endocrine and neurological symptoms. There are many dissimilar neurologic syndromes, some of which include Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic syndrome, encephalomyelitis, and sensory neuropathy. Paraneoplastic syndromes are strongly associated with SCLC because the antibodies that are generated, known as anti-Hu, have been shown to cross-react with human neuronal Ribonucleic Acid (RNA)-binding proteins, resulting in the development of enormous neurologic abnormalities, including paraneoplastic encephalomyelitis. It is possible for this to happen even before the patient is aware that they have the disease. The syndrome of inadequate ADH secretion (SIADH). is another name for hyponatremia of cancer. Patients diagnosed with SCLC have a significantly higher risk of SIADH than Cushing syndrome (5). Fortunately, not found in the present study. The characteristics that suggest a bad prognosis include variables that might be used to forecast results of a poor Performance Status (PS) of 3-4, an advanced disease stage, severe weight loss, and markers linked with an excessive bulk of disease. The breast, the kidney, and the colon are the locations that are most frequently associated with endobronchial metastases. In contrast to the present study, which showed that adrenal metastasis was present (6). Lesions that are polypoid or nodular in appearance and are covered with necrotic material is a common presentation of metastatic endobronchial malignancies. The most common lesion in this cell type is characterised by a polypoid shape and a rough surface coated with necrotic material. Specific examples have been recorded despite the fact that SCLC with endobronchial development is an extremely uncommon condition. SCLC is usually treated with palliated chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy, depending on the tumour size. A study by Sinha N et al., stated that the incidence of SCLC in a never-smoker female, accounts for 2.9% (7). Also, she found subcutaneous metastasis, which is rare for SCLC, in contrast to present studies in the form of adrenal metastasis. A study by Slotman BJ et al., in the Netherlands signified the use of prophylactic irradiation in patients who respond well to chemotherapy (8).

Khan P et al., studied various types of epigenetic modifications in the form of Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA), methylation, acetylation, etc., that serve as predictive biomarkers for the prognosis and treatment stratification of SCLC (9). The initial response to cisplatin and etoposide treatment for SCLC is quite favourable; nevertheless, the disease almost always develops a quick resistance to chemotherapy, which ultimately results in mortality within one year (10). Newer studies by Meijer JJ et al., studied the relevance of omics profiling has led to the development of immune-checkpoint inhibitors as single agents or in combination with chemotherapy, which, however, resulted in a prolonged benefit only for a small subset of patients (11). SCLC with endobronchial development is a rare tumour presentation found in a study by Kurishima K et al., (12).

Conclusion

Despite the fact that SCLC with endobronchial development is an exceedingly rare tumour presentation, the diagnosis should not be discounted in patients who arrive with a pulmonary tumour close to the bronchus and an endobronchial polypoid lesion. In the case of a female, especially one who has never smoked, one must always take the route of caution and consider the possibility of cancer, even if the symptoms are initially subtle and gradually worsen over time.

References

1.
Singh N, Agrawal S, Jiwnani S, Khosla D, Malik PS, Mohan A, et al. Lung cancer in India. J Thorac Oncol. 2021;16(8):1250-66. Doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.02.004. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Basumallik N, Agarwal M. Small Cell Lung Cancer. In: StatPearls 2022. Treasure Island [FL]: StatPearls Publishing.
3.
Kyritsis I, Krebs B, Kampe S, Theegarten D, Aigner C, Welter S. Erroneous diagnosis of small cell lung cancer based on small biopsies with far-reaching consequences: Case report of a typical carcinoid tumour. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(2):E99. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Travis WD. Update on small cell carcinoma and its differentiation from squamous cell carcinoma and other non small cell carcinomas. Mod Pathol. 2012;25(Suppl 1):S18-30. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Soomro Z, Youssef M, Yust-Katz S, Jalali A, Patel AJ, Mandel J. Paraneoplastic syndromes in small cell lung cancer. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2020;12(10):6253. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Bannon M, Marak C, Ashraf A, Smith C, Nunley M, Guddati AK, et al. Unusual presentation of a small cell lung cancer with bilateral breast metastases: Case report and a rief review of the literature. Respir Med Case Rep. 2022;38:101693. Doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2022.101693. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Sinha N, Niazi M, Diaz-Fuentes G, Duncalf R. An innocent appearing subcutaneous nodule diagnoses a small cell lung cancer in a never-smoker female. Case Reports in Oncological Medicine. 2014;2014:268404. Doi: 10.1155/2014/268404. Epub 2014 Mar 10. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Slotman BJ, van Tinteren H, Praag JO, Knegjens JL, El Sharouni SY, Hatton M, et al. Use of thoracic radiotherapy for extensive stage small-cell lung cancer: A phase 3 randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2015;385(9962):36-42. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Khan P, Siddiqui JA, Maurya SK, Lakshmanan I, Jain M, Ganti AK, et al. The epigenetic landscape of small cell lung cancer: Small image of a giant recalcitrant disease. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022;83:57-76. Doi: 10.1016/j. semcancer.2020.11.006. Epub 2020 Nov 18. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Gardner EE, Lok BH, Schneeberger VE, Desmeules P, Miles LA, Arnold PK, et al. Chemosensitive relapse in small cell lung cancer proceeds through an EZH2- SLFN11 axis. Cancer Cell. 2017;31(2):286-99. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Meijer JJ, Leonetti A, Airò G, Tiseo M, Rolfo C, Giovannetti E, et al. Small cell lung cancer: Novel treatments beyond immunotherapy. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022;86(Pt.6):376-85. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Kurishima K, Kagohashi K, Miyazaki K, Tamura T, Ohara G, Kawaguchi M, et al. Small cell lung cancer with endobronchial growth: A case report. Oncology Letters. 2013;6(2):553-55.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63386.17926

Date of Submission: Feb 09, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Mar 03, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Apr 24, 2023
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 15, 2023
• Manual Googling: Apr 19, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Apr 21, 2023 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com