Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 134913

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : May | Volume : 17 | Issue : 5 | Page : OC34 - OC37 Full Version

Effects of Serum Albumin Level in Lower vs Upper Extremity Surgery: A Hospital-based Retrospective Study


Published: May 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60126.17823
Tushar Kanti Bandyopadhyay, Amita Pathak

1. Associate Professor, Department of General Medicine, Deben Mahata Government Medical College and Hospital, Purulia, West Bengal, India. 2. Senior Medical Officer, Department of Emergency, West Bengal Health Service, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Tushar Kanti Bandyopadhyay,
728, Madurdah, Hossainpur, Kolkata-700107, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: drtkban011@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Trauma and major surgery often lead to low serum albumin levels in patients. Several studies have reported depressed serum albumin levels in upper and lower extremity and other major surgeries. Metabolic stress response from major surgical interventions and prolonged immobility is primarily responsible for low serum albumin levels in these patients.

Aim: To investigate the preoperative and postoperative serum albumin levels in patients who underwent extremity surgery and compare the changes in albumin levels between those who underwent upper extremity surgery versus lower extremity surgery.

Materials and Methods: This was a hospital-based retrospective study. The study included 120 patients who presented to the Emergency Department of Surgery and Orthopaedics at Deben Mahata Government Medical College and Hospital, Purulia, West Bengal, India due to trauma. The study was conducted from November 30, 2018 to November 30, 2021. All patients underwent either lower or upper extremity surgery (Group 1 and Group 2, respectively) by orthopaedic surgeons and were consecutively selected regardless of their ages. The serum albumin levels at the time of admission and on the third day after surgery were obtained from the hospital patient records. Continuous variables were expressed as mean±standard deviation. The normality test of the numerical variables was done using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.

Results: The mean age of the population in the upper extremity surgery group was 38.8 years vs 30.5 years in the lower extremity group. A statistically significant difference in the preoperative and postoperative serum albumin levels was found in both groups (p<0.05). Moreover, the mean difference between preoperative and postoperative serum albumin levels was found to be significantly higher in the lower extremity group (1.52±0.32 g/dL) than in the upper extremity group (0.95±0.39 g/dL) (p<0.05), and the coefficient of correlation between these two groups (r>0.7) indicated a significant difference between albumin levels in the two groups.

Conclusion: This study revealed that both upper and lower extremity surgeries caused hypoalbuminaemia. The study was novel in finding that lower extremity surgery caused more severe hypoalbuminaemia in the patients compared to those who underwent upper extremity surgery. A correlation study was done between the two groups, and it was found to be significant with a p-value of <0.05 and an r-value of >0.7. The reason for this significant difference was the longer duration of lower extremity surgery, requiring more fluid support during the surgery and resulting in increased metabolic stress.

Keywords

Falls from height, Hypoalbuminaemia, Major surgery, Trauma surgery

Hypoalbuminaemia is a well-known marker of malnutrition and has prognostic and predictive value for many diseases or conditions, including major surgery, carcinomas, trauma, and colorectal or gastrointestinal disorders. Decreased serum albumin levels directly impact the length of hospital stay, surgery complications, morbidity, and mortality (1),(2),(3),(4). Hypoalbuminaemia is associated with poor tissue healing and collagen synthesis, and it is a good marker of traumatic, cardiac, colorectal, and general surgery. Major surgical interventions and traumas cause severe stress responses that lead to higher rates of complications, delays in recovery, and even mortality [5-8]. Inflammatory markers, such as C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and albumin help determine a patient’s metabolic condition and predict their prognosis (8),(9),(10),(11). Studies have reported that hypoalbuminaemia is one of the markers of trauma and major surgery (10),(11),(12).

Albumin, a plasma protein synthesised in the liver, maintains colloid osmotic pressure that keeps body fluid in the intravascular space, shows antithrombotic effect, binds and transports some agents, scavenges free oxygen radicals, and plays a role in vascular permeability in shock and sepsis (12),(13). Serum albumin decreases in two ways: decreased synthesis of albumin in the liver due to chronic liver diseases, malnutrition, malabsorption, and carcinomas, and increased loss of albumin through traumas, nephrotic syndrome, major bleeding, fistulas, glomerulonephritis, pregnancy, and drug use (14),(15).

Several studies have reported hypoalbuminaemia as a marker of trauma and major surgery. Sun J et al., demonstrated the consequences of hypoalbuminaemia in surgical septic patients (15). Shin KH et al., found early postoperative hypoalbuminaemia as a risk factor for postoperative pneumonia following hip fracture surgery (16). Althoff AD et al., observed postoperative hypoalbuminaemia following proximal humerus fracture surgery and found it to be a risk factor for postoperative complications (17). Vora M et al., focused on upper extremity surgery due to trauma and resultant hypoalbuminaemia (18). Most studies have focused on extremity surgery due to trauma and resultant hypoalbuminaemia, but only a few studies have reported the comparison between upper and lower extremity surgery patients in terms of hypoalbuminaemia.

Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the preoperative and postoperative serum albumin levels in patients who underwent extremity surgery and compare the changes in albumin levels after upper extremity surgery with those after lower extremity surgery and it will be one of the few studies in the literature.

Material and Methods

The study was a hospital-based retrospective study. It was carried out in the Department of surgery and Orthopaedics, Deben Mahata Government Medical College and Hospital, Purulia, West Bengal, India. A total of 120 patients who were referred to the Emergency Department of the tertiary care hospital with trauma such as traffic accidents, falls, falls from a height between November 30, 2018 to November 30, 2021 were enrolled in the study, retrospectively and the data was collected from case registry and records of the Department of Surgery and Orthopaedics.

Inclusion criteria: All the patients included in the study underwent upper or lower extremity surgery by Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology and were consecutively selected, regardless of their ages. In addition patients with only acute traumatic surgery and one extremity surgery were selected.

Exclusion criteria: Those who had multiple trauma or underwent multiple surgeries were excluded from study. Patients who underwent both upper and lower extremity surgeries were also excluded. Routine orthopaedic surgeries were excluded as well.

Study Procedure

The patients were divided in two groups: upper extremity surgery (60 patients) and lower extremity surgery (60 patients). The serum albumin levels at the time of admission and on the third day after the surgery were obtained from the hospital patient records. They were analysed using a particle-enhanced turbimetric inhibition immunoassay method with an autoanalyser. The serum albumin level of the patients was tested each day during hospitalisation. All the patients in the present study stayed at hospital for atleast three days and most of them (64/120) stayed only for six days. Therefore, the albumin levels of the days 0, 3 were noted for a standardised interpretation.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as mean±standard deviation. The normality test of the numerical variables using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The Independent sample t-test was used to compare two independent groups. The paired sample t-test was used to compare pre- and postoperative albumin levels. In order to find out whether there is significant correlation between the serum albumin level (pre and postoperative) of the two groups (patients of upper extremity surgery and that of lower extremity surgery group) we have calculated coefficient of correlation which is represented by the symbol “r” and is given by the formula of coefficient of correlation. The correlation coefficient r tends to lie between -1.0 and+1.0, if r is near+1 it indicates a strong positive association. A value near-1 indicates a strong negative association. Data were statistically analysed using the software Jamovi Project (2018; Jamovi version 0.9.2.6; retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org, open source). The p-value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

The upper extremity surgery group consisted of 34 (56.7%) male and 26 (43-3%) female patients and the lower extremity surgery group had 32 (53.3%) male and 28 (46.7%) female patients. No statistical significant gender variation between patients undergoing upper and lower extremity surgery is found (p=0.124) (Table/Fig 1). No statistically significant differences between the preoperative serum albumin levels were found (1.31±0.43 g/dL in males and 1.14±0.48 g/dL in females; p=0.150). The mean age of the 35patients who underwent upper and lower extremity surgeries was 43.20±22.05 years (between 11 and 80 years) and 42.76±20.97 years (between 6 and 76 years), respectively. No statistically significant correlation between ages of patients and differences in preoperative and postoperative serum albumin levels was found (r=- 0.239 and p=0.202 in lower extremity surgery group; r=0.070 and p=0.714 in the upper extremity age surgery group).

The mean hospitalisation period was 7.93±1.43 days (min: 6, max: 9) for the patients in the upper extremity surgery group and 8.41±1.86 days (min: 6, max: 10) in the lower extremity surgery group. No significant difference in terms of hospital stay was observed between the two groups. The most common reason for the fractures was falls in both groups (28 patients for both groups) (Table/Fig 2). The most common reason for the fractures was falls in both groups. The other common reasons were falls from height and out-car and in-car traffic accidents.

Six patients in the upper extremity surgery group had open humerus shaft fractures: 4 of these had Gustli Anderson type 2 and two had type 3a. Among the 54 patients with closed fractures, 22 patients had humerus shaft fractures,12 had humerus supracondylar fractures, eight had humerus proximal fractures, four had humerus medial epicondyle fractures, eight had clavicular, ulnar or radius fractures. In the lower extremity surgery group 4 patients had open femur shaft fractures. Among the 56 patients with closed fractures, 14 had multiple femur and/or tibia fractures, 10 had tibia shaft fractures, six had femur shaft fractures, four had tibia-fibula fracture, four had tibial plate fractures,14 had single tibial fractures in various segments and four had single femur fractures.

The serum albumin levels were normal before the surgery but decreased after the surgery in both groups. A statistically significant difference in terms of preoperative and postoperative serum albumin levels was noted in both groups (p<0.05) (Table/Fig 3). Drop of mean value of serum albumin on postoperative (3rd day) from that of preoperative Serum albumin value in lower extremity group was more than that of upper extremity group in the present study. The mean difference between preoperative and postoperative serum albumin levels was found to be 0.95±0.39 g/dL. In the upper extremity surgery group and 1.52±0.32 g/dL in the lower extremity surgery group. The mean difference between these two groups was statistically significant (p<0.05) indicating that the lower extremity surgery patients had a significantly higher decrease in albumin levels (Table/Fig 2). The coefficient of correlation between these two groups r>0.7 indicated significant difference between albumin levels in two groups.

Discussion

Hypoalbuminaemia is a marker of malnourishment and is associated with higher rates of early complications in patients undergoing surgical treatment for major traumatic events. Alberti LR et al., showed in their study that there was hypoalbuminaemia following major surgeries in the 1st postoperative week and this was significantly correlated with duration of surgery (r≥0.7) (9). Sindgikar V et al., found significant postoperative hypoalbuminaemia in 48.5% cases in their study and it was associated with higher risk of complications (12). Vora M et al., found that hypoalbuminaemia is associated with higher risk for complications and readmission after proximal humerus fracture surgery (18). Sun J et al., found that preoperative and subsequently postoperative Serum level of albumin estimation will help to predict the prognosis of patients of both upper and lower extremity surgery as well as other major surgery (15). The present study showed that upper and lower extremity surgeries were associated with postoperative hypoalbuminaemia. In addition, the study showed that the serum albumin levels were significantly decreased in the surgery of lower extremity compared with that of upper extremity.

Several studies reported an association between malnutrition and major surgery. Studies showed that hypoalbuminaemia was a marker of malnutrition in the patients who underwent major surgery (8),(9),(10),(16). However, in the present study all the patients of both groups had the same nutrition programme. In addition some studies showed that plasma albumin levels might decrease in spite of aggressive replacement therapy in some major trauma patients. They explained that the condition was due to altered endothelial permeability caused by cytokines such as interleukin 1 (8),(9),(10),(11),(17). Thus, the study showed that hypoalbuminaemia occurred due to not only malnutrition but also some other factors.

Stress response after surgery and trauma has been a well-known entity, and it involved emerging metabolic, hormonal and electrolyte changes, and release of cytokines. It was stated that albumin showed an immediate response to surgical stress (2),(9),(14). Hubner M et al., found that postoperative decrease in serum albumin reflected the magnitude of surgery and the associated stress response (8). In major trauma and surgeries excessive fluid leaks into the interstitial and intravascular spaces as a result of systemic and tissue reactions, thereby decreasing the serum albumin levels (3),(12). Protein metabolism reported to be significantly disturbed after any kind of traumatic event such as surgery, sepsis and burn injuries. Albumin has been identified as a reliable marker of the process. Serum concentration of albumin showed a significant decrease as early as a few hours after the trauma or surgery (1),(4),(10). In the study of Ryan S et al., serum albumin showed significant drop on the first postoperative day and the mean difference between preoperative and postoperative serum albumin levels was found to be 1.54±0.34 g/dL (13). In the study of Althoff AD et al., there was significant fall of serum albumin concentration with the mean difference between preoperative and postoperative serum level of 1.49±0.36 gm/dL (17). In the present study, it was accepted that all the patients had trauma and stress and all underwent a major surgery. This explained the cause of hyperalbuminemia in all patients, who participated in the study, however the significantly higher albuminemia in the lower extremity surgery patients was not clearly understood as it was not known which of the two surgeries caused more stress. We have attempted to assess stress by measuring serum albumin concentration which is an important parameter of surgical stress.

One of the major differences between the patient groups in this study was immobility. Patients who underwent lower extremity surgery had much more immobility duration than the one who had upper extremity surgery. Despite the fact that, Afshinnia F et al., stated that immobility and hypoalbuminaemia are closely associated with osteoporosis, no evidence about an association between hypoalbuminaemia and immobility of the patients was found (14). Immobility in the lower extremity surgery patients was considered to cause more severe hypoalbuminaemia in the present study although enough evidence was lacking. In the present study, six patients had open fractures in the upper extremity surgery group and four in the lower extremity surgery group. However, multiple close fractures were more in the lower extremity surgery group. This could be a reason for the difference between the groups causing a higher albumin decrease due to an effect on increasing metabolism as a result of trauma and injury (7),(18),(19).

The other major difference between the patient groups was the duration of the surgery. The lower extremity surgery took significantly more time compared with the upper extremity surgery. Therefore, more fluid support was given to the patients in the lower extremity surgery groups during the surgery. More liquid support results in the dilution of plasma and a hence decreased serum albumin level. In this context, the given excessive fluid was rapidly eliminated and the overload of sodium was slowly ejected resulting in further elongated extra fluid dilution of albumin. Studies have shown that the severity of the catabolic damage caused a proportional increase in vascular permeability (14),(15),(16). Therefore, in the present study the duration of surgery of the lower extremities and the higher amount of fluid given during the surgery might explain the decrease in albumin.

Older patients who underwent surgery had more severe hypoalbuminaemia compared with the younger patients (9),(15). However in the present study, no association was found between the age of patients and serum albumin levels. In addition, no relationship was found between the serum albumin levels and the gender of patients.

Limitation(s)

The patients were followed-up only for first seven days, not until the discharge. In addition, the serum level was observed only as laboratory finding the clinical reflection of hypoalbuminaemia was not recorded in the study.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the study found that both upper and lower extremity surgeries result in hypoalbuminaemia. Additionally, the study is novel in discovering that lower extremity surgery causes more severe hypoalbuminaemia in patients than upper extremity surgery, regardless of factors such as age, sex, nutrition, and stress. The significant difference in severity could be explained by the longer duration of lower extremity surgeries, which require more fluid support during the procedure.

References

1.
Truong A, Hanna MH, Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Stamos MJ. Implications of preoperative hypoalbumiemia in colorectal surgery. World J Gasrointest Surg. 2016;8:353-62. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Labgaa I, Joliat GR, Demartines N, Hubner M. Serum albumin is an early predictor of complications after liver surgery. Dig Liver Dis. 2016;48:559-61. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Sang BH, Bang JY, Jonh JG, Hwang GS. Hypoalbuminemia within two postoperative days is an independent risk factor for acute kidney injury following living donor liver transplantation: A propensity score analysis of 998 consecutive patients. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:2552-61. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Lee JI, Kwon M, Roh JL, Choi JW, Choi SH, Nam SY, et al. Postoperative hypoalbuminemia as a risk factor for surgical site infection after oral cancer surgery. Oral Dis. 2015;21:178-84.[crossref][PubMed]
5.
Fujjwara Y, Shiba H, Shirai Y, Iwase R, Furuka K, Futagawa Y, et al. Peri-operative serum albumin correlates with postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreato-duodenectomy. Anticancer Res. 2015;35:499-503.
6.
Lagbaa I, Joliat GR, Kefleysus A, Mantzari S, Schafer M, Demartines N, et al. Is postoperative decrease of Serum albumin as an early protector of complications after major abdominal surgery? A prospective cohort study in a European centre. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e013966. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Marik PE, Flemmer M. The immune response to surgery and trauma: Implications for treatment. J trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;73:801-08. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Hubner M, Mantizari S, Demartines N, Pralong F, Coti-Bertrand P, Schafer M. Postoperative Albumin drop is a marker for surgical stress and a predictor for surgical stress and a predictor for clinical outcome: A pilot study. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:184-89. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Alberti LR, Petroianu A, Veloso DFM. The effect of surgical trauma in postoperative albumin concentration after major surgeries. Einstein S (Sao Paulo). 2016;7:48-51.
10.
Rittler P, Jacobs R, Demmelmair H, Kuppinger D, Braun S, Koletkzko B, et al. Dynamics of albumin synthesis after major rectal operation. Surgery. 2017;141:660-66. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Kim S, McClave SA, Martindale RG, Miller KR, Hurt RT. Hypoalbuminemia and clinical outcomes: What is the mechanism behind the relationship? Am Surg. 2017;83:1220-27. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Sindgikar V, Narasangi B, Tejasvini V, Ragate A, Patel FA. Effect of serum albumin in wound healing and its related complications in surgical patients.AL Ameen J Med Sci. 2017;10:132-35.
13.
Ryan S, Politzer C, Fletcher A, Bolognesi M, Seyler T. Preoperative hypoalbuminemia predicts poor short-term outcomes for hip-fracture surgery. Orthopaedics. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20180912-03. [crossref]
14.
Afshinnia F, Wrong KK, Sundaram B, Ackermann RJ, Pennathur S. Hypoalbiminemia and osteoporosis: Reappraisal of a Controversy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101:167-75. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Sun J, Sun F, Wang X, Yuan S, Zheng S, Mu X. Risk factors and prognosis of hypoalbuminemia in surgical septic patients. Peer J. 2015;3:e1267. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Shin KH, Kim JJ, Son SW, Hwang KS, Han SB. Early Postoperative Hypoalbuminemia as a risk factor for postoperative pneumonia following hip fracture surgery. Pubmed Central. 2020;15:1907-15. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Althoff AD, Ignozzi AJ, Bell JE, Werner BC. Preoperative Hypoalbuminemia is associated with complications following proximal humerus fracture surgery: An analysis of 919 patients. HSS J. 2020;16(Suppl 2):436-42. PMCID: PMC7749917 PMID: 33380978. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Vora M, Sing DC, Yi PH, Cheah JW, Li X. Hypoalbuminemia is a risk factor for predicting early postoperative complications after proximal humerus fracture fixation J Orthop. 2019;19:106-10. Journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/ locate/jor, PMCID: PMC6997658, PMID: 32025114. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Reis TG, Prudêncio da Silva RAW, Nascimento EdS, Júnior JdB, Oliveira MC, Fava AS, et al. Early postoperative serum albumin levels as predictors of surgical outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 2022;88(1):S48-S56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. bjorl.2021.03.004.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60126.17823

Date of Submission: Sep 08, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jan 17, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Apr 05, 2023
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? NA
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 09, 2022
• Manual Googling: Feb 14, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Mar 11, 2023 (18%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com