Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 156422

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : May | Volume : 17 | Issue : 5 | Page : OC29 - OC33 Full Version

Electrocardiographic Changes among Moderate and Severe COVID-19 Patients in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital at Shahdol, Madhya Pradesh, India: A Record-based Study


Published: May 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62438.17822
Rupesh Kumar Gupta, Jeetendra Sharma, Roopa Agrawal, Rupesh Sahu, Santenna Chenchula, Pradeep Kumar Pathak

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Birsa Munda Medical College, Shahdol, Madhya Pradesh, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Birsa Munda Medical College, Shahdol, Madhya Pradesh, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Bundelkhand Medical College Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Chhindwara Institute of Medical Science, Chhindwara, Madhya Pradesh, India. 5. Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. 6. Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Birsa Munda Medical College Shahdol, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Rupesh Kumar Gupta,
Ward 14, Sarda Colony, Shahdol-484001, Madhya Pradesh, India.
E-mail: neolog.raj@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-2019) patients are largely unknown. ECG changes in COVID-19 disease may guide to initiate therapeutic anticoagulation, more so in moderate and severe disease.

Aim: To identify various ECG changes in moderate and severe COVID-19 patients and to ascertain the association between initial ECG changes and disease outcome.

Materials and Methods: This was retrospective record-based study was conducted in the Department of Internal Medicine, Birsa Munda Medical College, Shahdol, Madhya Pradesh, India, on 216 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in a tertiary care teaching hospital from March 2021 to June 2021. Demographic and clinical data including ECG were extracted from medical records of the patients and if needed, the patients were followed-up till outcome. COVID-19 disease severity was considered based on oxygen saturation at room air (moderate: 94%-90%; severe: <90%). Data were entered using the Epicollect5 mobile application to minimise errors.

Results: A total of 216 patients were included (35 to 54 years), the majority were male. Mortality rate was 46.3%. Total 57.4% of ECG changes were classified as abnormal. Sinus tachycardia was the most common abnormality followed by ischaemic changes. Left axis deviation in ECG was more commonly seen than right axis deviation. Total 53.2% of patients with abnormal ECG findings and 36.9% with normal ECG findings died. Mortality was very high in patients with ischaemic changes.

Conclusion: COVID-19 patients with ischaemic changes in ECG were significantly associated with increased mortality. Hence, early detection of these changes in COVID-19 patients is vital and will help primary care physicians to intervene early and help in deciding therapeutic anticoagulation requirements in patients with COVID-19.

Keywords

Coronavirus disease 2019, Ischaemic changes, Oxygen saturation, Therapeutic anticoagulation

Being first reported in December 2019, COVID-19 infection caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus, increased in numbers dramatically throughout the world forcing World Health Organisation (WHO), to declare it as a global pandemic. With the start of the second wave in India, it has been very clear that mortality in COVID-19 infection is highly associated with comorbidities and multiorgan involvement. In a study of COVID-19 patient, it had been shown that in hospital mortality was very high with cardiovascular involvement (1). A wide range of cardiovascular events such as myocardial injury, acute coronary syndromes, cardiac arrhythmias, and heart failure are associated with COVID-19 (2),(3).

In a study comprising 138 hospitalised COVID-19 patients, cardiac injury was reported in 7.2% of patients (4). Increased expression of Angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE 2) receptors in cardiac pericytes, cardiac myocytes apoptosis caused by loading of intracellular calcium due to hypoxia and excessive release of various cytokines were probable mechanism of cardiac injury in COVID-19 (5). The best, non invasive and cost-effective tool to detect earlier cardiac involvement in COVID-19 is ECG changes. Earlier studies had already described various ECG abnormalities in viral illnesses. ECG changes noticed during Swine flu (H1N1) 2009 pandemic were for short period of time and these changes were not related to patient’s earlier conditions or further outcome (6). Uptill today, no significant ECG abnormalities have been explained in COVID-19 patients. Still today incidence and prevalence of ECG abnormalities in COVID-19 patients is not known (7). ECG changes in COVID-19 may also guide us to initiate therapeutic anticoagulation. As guidelines suggest that, therapeutic anticoagulation is reserved for patients who developed features of thromboembolism (like raised D dimer levels), hence, signs of ischaemia and/or infarction in ECG may guide us to initiate therapeutic anticoagulation (8). Knowledge of early ECG changes will enable the primary care physician to become alert for upcoming possible catastrophe. The present study was conducted with objectives to identify various ECG changes in moderate and severe COVID-19 patients and to ascertain the association between initial ECG changes and disease outcome.

Material and Methods

The present study was designed as retrospective record-based study conducted in the Department of Internal Medicine, Birsa Munda Medical College, Shahdol, Madhya Pradesh, India. Data was collected from 1st March 2021 to 30th June 2021. Analysis time period Feb 2022 to May 2022. Study was approved by Institutional Ethics and Review committee (IERC/21/09/02). The study has been conducted in accordance with the ethical principles mentioned in the Declaration of Helsinski (2013).

Inclusion criteria: Patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) with moderate or severe disease, having ECG recorded early at admission, at an associated hospital of Government medical college were included. Informed consent was taken from all the participants.

Exclusion criteria: Those not consenting were excluded. The authors did not put any stringent exclusion criteria, so as to avoid bias and increase generalisability.

Sample size calculation: Sample size was calculated using formula for estimation of proportion. Since the disease was new at the time of study, there was not enough data on ECG changes, hence, through consultation with senior consultants and an intelligent guess, authors expected 15% abnormal ECG findings among the moderate to severe COVID-19 patients. With 95% confidence, 5% absolute precision and adding 10% for non response, the final sample size was calculated to be 216. Universal sampling was done. The authors collected data for 216 important subjects.

Study Procedure

From the hospital records, data was abstracted for patients satisfying inclusion criteria. Data was abstracted in data abstraction form having concerned variables. Data was entered at the time of data collection itself by the consultants, with the help of the Epicollect5 mobile application to minimise errors of data entry. Primary outcome variable was whether the patient was discharged from the hospital or died. If the patient leaves the hospital without any information, it is considered as considered ‘Discharged Against Medical Advice’ (DAMA). The authors have counted ‘DAMA’ patients under ‘discharged’ for analysis. Other variables include age, gender, symptoms with duration, clinical data (SpO2, Pulse, Systolic and Diastolic BP) and ECG analysis (as described below) was done. Primary source of data was hospital records. The outcomes as documented in the records were taken and those still in the hospital were followed-up until either discharge or death in the hospital (outcome). Those patients with oxygen saturation between 93%-90% at room air were considered as having moderate disease and those with less than 90% at room air were considered as having severe COVID-19 disease (9).

Electrocardiographic (ECG) analysis: All 12-lead electrocardiograms recorded as early as possible after admission (as standard protocol 1 millivolt equals to 10 millimeters and speed of ECG paper will be 25 mm/s) then offline analysis was done (10). ECG was evaluated by consultants from the internal medicine department. The considered parameters were rate, rhythm (sinus, supraventricular or ventricular), QTc (using Bazett formula), various conduction abnormalities like atrioventricular block, bundle branch block, or fascicular block and ST-T segment deviation. Height difference (in millimetres) was measured between baseline TP segment and J point as ST segment alterations. In the proper clinical context, ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) is considered when at least two contiguous leads with ST-segment elevation ≥2 mm in men or ≥1.5 mm in women in chest leads and/or ≥1 mm in the other leads. Non ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) is considered with depression of similar measurement along with chest pain and/or positive cardiac biomarker, if available. T wave was considered normal if voltage ≥0.1 mV and remained upright in all leads except in lead III, aVR and V1. Abnormal Q waves were considered when its depth was >25% of QRS complex or >2 mm depth below isoelectric line or >40 ms width (11). Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH) was labelled when it follows Sokolow-Lyon criteria (depth of S wave in V1+height of R wave in V5 or V6 ≥35 mm or height of R wave in aVL ≥11 mm) (8). Electrocardiogram was considered abnormal, if any of the following changes like significant ST segment deviations, abnormal T wave, LVH, tachyarrhythmias or bradyarrhythmias. Patients with sinus rhythm without above described changes were considered as normal.

Statistical Analysis

Chi-square and Fischer’s-exact test was used to analyse association between qualitative variables. Percentages and proportions were used as descriptive tools for categorical variables. Mean and standard deviations were used for describing numerical data. The p-value <0.05 was taken as being statistically significant. Analysis was done by MS Excel and Epi info 7.

Results

In total, the authors studied 216 patients with complete clinical data and ECG changes. The authors excluded those with incomplete data. Descriptive statistics of the patient sample are explained in (Table/Fig 1). The mean (SD) age of the study sample was 50.12 (13.8) years, ranged from 15 to 90 years. Median (IQR) age was 50 (39-60) years. About 62% (134/216) of the patients were male. The majority belonged to 35 to 64 years age group (154/216, 71.2%), and 37/134 (28.7%) males belonged to the middle age-group of 45 to 54 years in which the majority (25/82, 30%) of females were also present. Patients of extreme age group were very less in number in either gender.

(Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3) shows that nearly 70% (152/216) of patients in the sample belonged to the severe disease category and the rest 30% (64/216) were moderate disease. Out of 216 patients, a total of 100 (46.3%) patients died while 109 (50.5%) were discharged fairly from the hospital, whereas 3.2% (7/216) patients were considered DAMA. The authors have considered ‘DAMA’ patients as ‘discharged’ for analysis.

(Table/Fig 4) summarises overall ECG changes in which 57.4% (124/216) (95% CI 50.52%-64.09%) were classified as having abnormal ECG. Sinus tachycardia was the commonest abnormality followed by ischaemic changes (STEMI, NSTEMI and T wave inversion. Left axis deviation in ECG was more commonly seen than right axis deviation (35/216 vs 6/216).

(Table/Fig 5) presents ECG changes in moderate and severe category patients. Rhythm disturbances like atrial fibrillation/flutter were seen in only one patient of severe category, while none of the patients in the moderate category developed the same. Similarly, right and left bundle branch block was found in only severe category patients. Left axis deviation was more in moderate category patients (11/64, 17.18%) as compared to severe category (24/152, 15.8%). Ischaemic events suggested by STEMI/NSTEMI and localised T wave inversion were very commonly noticed in severe category patients. Localised T wave inversion was found in 39/152 (25.7%) patients in the severe group and 9/64 (14%) in the moderate group. One patient (1/152, 0.6%) developed STEMI and eight patients (8/152, 5.3%) developed NSTEMI, seen only in severe category patients. A tall peaked T wave in ECG was seen in 5/152 (3.3%) vs 1/64 (1.5%) in severe and moderate groups respectively. About 53% (34/64) of moderate COVID-19 patients had abnormal ECG whereas 59.2% (90/152) of severe COVID-19 patients had abnormal ECG. However, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.409).

When the authors looked for the association between ECG changes and disease outcome (Table/Fig 6), 53.2% (66/124) of patients with abnormal ECG findings died, while 36.9% (34/92) with normal ECG findings died (p=0.018). Nearly 57% (38/67) of patients with sinus tachycardia died, while 43.3% (29/67) survived (p=0.0039) (Table/Fig 7). Mortality was very high in patients developing Ischaemic changes in ECG. Only one patient with ECG signifying NSTEMI changes, survived, while the rest of the patients died (p=0.026). Nearly 60% (29/48) of the patients with localised T wave inversion died, while 39.6% (19/48) survived (p=0.026). Four out of six patients with tall peaked T wave died, the rest survived. Five out of eight patients with Right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) died (p=0.476), while two out of nine patients with LVH died (p=0.181).

Discussion

With this retrospective study, the authors aimed to identify various ECG changes in moderate and severe COVID-19 patients and to ascertain the association between initial ECG changes and disease outcome. Commonest abnormality was sinus tachycardia (31%), followed by localised T wave inversion (22.2%) and left axis deviation (16.2%). Approximately, 57% were classified as having abnormal ECG with one or more abnormalities. Those who died had statistically significant association with having sinus tachycardia, NSTEMI and localised T wave inversion. It is well-known fact that respiratory symptoms associated with COVID-19 is primarily due to ACE2 expression in the type 2 lung alveolar cells; however, over 7.5% of myocardial cells also express the ACE2 receptor (12). While these receptors are responsible for most of the cardiac symptoms also, the aetiology of the cardiovascular symptoms in COVID-19 is likely multifactorial (12),(13),(14),(16).

Hypoxic injury, cytokine storm, and thromboembolism caused by COVID-19 virus will lead to various cardiac abnormalities and fatal outcome. These abnormalities can be picked easily and early by looking various ECG changes like rhythm disturbances, ischaemic events, axis deviation, etc. Here, the authors analysed the data of 216 patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 infection admitted to the tertiary care centre and key issues related to their ECG changes are discussed ahead.

The most common ECG abnormality encountered was Sinus tachycardia and it was more frequent among those who died (38%) as compared to those who survived (25%) (p=0.039). Serious rhythm disturbances like atrial fibrillation/flutter was seen in one patient. Earlier studies showed that commonest supraventricular tachycardia seen in COVID-19 patient was sinus tachycardia and fever, pain, anxiety, hypoperfusion and reduced oxygenation were the usual causes. Second most common supraventricular tachycardia was atrial fibrillation (17),(18),(19).

New York hospital study showed that 14.3% of COVID-19 patients present with atrial fibrillation at the time of admission and 10.1% patients developed, during hospitalisation (20). One more study showed that, in patients with severe COVID-19 infections, who required mechanical ventilation 22% of them developed atrial fibrillation (21). In the present study, mortality was 57% in patient with sinus tachycardia and 100% with atrial fibrillation. Outcome in COVID-19 patients was depends on various factors, but sinus tachycardia and atrial fibrillation were independently responsible for the severity of illness and its poor outcome (17).

The authors did not find any patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmia like Ventricular tachycardia/Ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) in the present study, probably due to the fact that these findings were terminal events and the authors were considering initial ECG changes.

Next common finding was ischaemic changes characterised by ST-T changes included STEMI/NSTEMI/localised T wave inversion. Severe viral infections can cause a systemic inflammatory response syndrome that increases the risk of plaque rupture and thrombus formation, resulting in either an ST-elevation MI or non ST-elevation MI (22). One study showed that cardiac injury suggested by ST-T changes like ST segment elevation or depression or T wave inversion and pathologic Q waves was seen in patients with COVID-19 infections (23),(24),(25),(26),(27),(28). Another study noted that in COVID-19 patients who required ICU admissions, 40% had ST-T changes (29). Mortality among patients with ischaemic changes was also very high in the present study as compared to those discharged (p=0.026). One more study showed that ST-T changes were observed in nearly 41% of COVID-19 patients and most of these changes were due to cardiac damage and responsible for more critical care unit admission, increased ventilator support and very high mortality (17),(21).

Axis deviation in ECG was not very common in the present study and was seen in 18% of patients. Left axis deviation was found more common than right axis deviation however, it was not statistically significant (p=0.853). Precise mechanism for left axis deviation might be ischaemia, left ventricular overload or hypertrophy. Right axis deviation was due to right ventricular strain in patients presenting with acute lung injury due to consolidation or pulmonary embolism (26). In the present study, mortality seems to be very high in patients with axis deviation in ECG. One study founded axis deviation to be in 11% of patients and was more often among non survivors (30).

More of those with abnormal ECG died, as compared to those with normal ECG’s at admission, and the finding was statistically significant, suggesting to the physician to become alert on finding abnormality in ECG on initial admission. The authors tried to make the sample as representative as possible with not much exclusion criterion, hence a balanced interpretation on generalisability could be expected.

Limitation(s)

Old ECG records of the patients were not available, hence it cannot be commented upon that the current ECG changes have occurred afresh or were pre-existing.

Conclusion

Sinus tachycardia was the commonest ECG finding followed by ischaemic changes associated with infarction (localised T wave inversion) which were associated with very high mortality, followed further by left axis deviation. Early detection of these changes even before worsening of oxygenation will help in addition of anti-ischaemic and anticoagulant drugs in full therapeutic doses to avoid probable mortality. The authors found significant association between abnormal ECG at admission and risk of death in moderate to severe COVID-19 patients. Prospective, larger studies are recommended in future, for other better causal evidences.

References

1.
Shi S, Qin M, Shen B, Cai Y, Liu T, Yang F, et al. Association of cardiac injury with mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(7):802-10. Doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0950. PMID: 32211816; PMCID: PMC7097841. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Bonow RO, Fonarow GC, O’Gara PT, Yancy CW. Association of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) with myocardial injury and mortality. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(7):751-53. Doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1105. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Inciardi RM, Lupi L, Zaccone G, Italia L, Raffo M, Tomasoni D, et al. Cardiac involvement in a patient with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(7):819-24. Doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1096. PMID: 32219357; PMCID: PMC7364333. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020;323(11):1061-69. Doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1585. Erratum in: JAMA. 2021 Mar 16;325(11):1113. PMID: 32031570; PMCID: PMC7042881. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Zheng YY, Ma YT, Zhang JY, Xie X. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17(5):259-60. Doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0360-5. PMID: 32139904; PMCID: PMC7095524. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Akritidis N, Mastora M, Baxevanos G, Dimos G, Pappas G. Electrocardiographic abnormalities in patients with novel H1N1 influenza virus infection. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106(10):1517-19. Doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.078. Epub 2010 Sep 24. PMID: 21059446. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Kochi AN, Tagliari AP, Forleo GB, Fassini GM, Tondo C. Cardiac and arrhythmic complications in patients with COVID-19. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31(5):1003-08. Doi: 10.1111/jce.14479. Epub 2020 Apr 13. PMID: 32270559; PMCID: PMC7262150. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Treatment Guidelines. National Institutes of Health. Available at: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/.
9.
Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Clinical management. Protocol for COVID-19 (in adults), version 6, 24 May 2021, 4 p.
10.
Bergamaschi L, D’Angelo EC, Paolisso P, Toniolo S, Fabrizio M, Angeli F, et al. The value of ECG changes in risk stratification of COVID-19 patients. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2021;26(3):e12815. Doi: 10.1111/anec.12815. Epub 2021 Jan 29. PMID: 33512742; PMCID: PMC7994985I. [crossref]
11.
Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018;39(2):119-77. Doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393. PMID: 28886621. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Zou X, Chen K, Zou J, Han P, Hao J, Han Z. Single-cell RNA-seq data analysis on the receptor ACE2 expression reveals the potential risk of different human organs vulnerable to 2019-nCoV infection. Front Med. 2020;14(2):185-92. Doi: 10.1007/s11684-020-0754-0. Epub 2020 Mar 12. PMID: 32170560; PMCID: PMC7088738. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Esler M, Esler D. Can angiotensin receptor-blocking drugs perhaps be harmful in the COVID-19 pandemic? J Hypertens. 2020;38(5):781-82. Doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002450. PMID: 32195824. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Yao XH, Li TY, He ZC, Ping YF, Liu HW, Yu SC, et al. A pathological report of three COVID-19 cases by minimal invasive autopsies. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2020;49(5):411-17. Chinese. Doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20200312-00193. PMID: 32172546.
15.
Prabhu SD. Cytokine-induced modulation of cardiac function. Circ Res. 2004;95(12):1140-53. Doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000150734.79804.92. PMID: 15591236. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Levi M, van der Poll T, Büller HR. Bidirectional relation between inflammation and coagulation. Circulation. 2004;109(22):2698-704. Doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000131660.51520.9A. PMID: 15184294. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Wang Y, Chen L, Wang J, He X, Huang F, Chen J, et al. Electrocardiogram analysis of patients with different types of COVID-19. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2020;25(6):e12806. Doi: 10.1111/anec.12806. Epub 2020 Sep 20. PMID: 32951316; PMCID: PMC7536962. [crossref]
18.
Bradley A, Sheridan P. Atrial fibrillation. BMJ. 2013;346:f3719. Doi: https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.f3719. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Brady WJ, Ferguson JD, Ullman EA, Perron AD. Myocarditis: Emergency department recognition and management. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2004;22(4):865-85. Doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2004.05.010. PMID: 15474774. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Abrams MP, Wan EY, Waase MP, Morrow JP, Dizon JM, Yarmohammadi H, et al. Clinical and cardiac characteristics of COVID-19 mortalities in a diverse New York City Cohort. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31(12):3086-96. Doi: 10.1111/jce.14772. Epub 2020 Oct 20. PMID: 33022765; PMCID: PMC7675758. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Bertini M, Ferrari R, Guardigli G, MalagÙ M, Vitali F, Zucchetti O, et al. Electrocardiographic features of 431 consecutive, critically ill COVID-19 patients: An insight into the mechanisms of cardiac involvement. Europace. 2020;22(12):1848-54. Doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa258. PMID: 32944767; PMCID: PMC7543398. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Warren-Gash C, Hayward AC, Hemingway H, Denaxas S, Thomas SL, Timmis AD, et al. Influenza infection and risk of acute myocardial infarction in England and Wales: A CALIBER self-controlled case series study. J Infect Dis. 2012;206(11):1652-59. Doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis597. Epub 2012 Oct 9. PMID: 23048170; PMCID: PMC3488196. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Driggin E, Madhavan MV, Bikdeli B, Chuich T, Laracy J, Biondi-Zoccai G, et al. Cardiovascular considerations for patients, health care workers, and health systems during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(18):2352-71. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.031. Epub 2020 Mar 19. PMID: 32201335; PMCID: PMC7198856. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Long B, Brady WJ, Koyfman A, Gottlieb M. Cardiovascular complications in COVID-19. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(7):1504-07. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.048. Epub 2020 Apr 18. PMID: 32317203; PMCID: PMC7165109. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M, Wu X, Zhang L, He T, et al. Cardiovascular implications of fatal outcomes of patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(7):811-18. Doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1017. Erratum in: JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(7):848. PMID: 32219356; PMCID: PMC7101506. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Elias P, Poterucha TJ, Jain SS, Sayer G, Raikhelkar J, Fried J, et al. The prognostic value of electrocardiogram at presentation to emergency department in patients with COVID-19. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95(10):2099-109. Doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.07.028. Epub 2020 Aug 15. PMID: 33012341; PMCID: PMC7428764.[crossref][PubMed]
27.
Haseeb S, Gul EE, Çinier G, Bazoukis G, Alvarez-Garcia J, Garcia-Zamora S, et al. International Society of Electrocardiology Young Community (ISE-YC). Value of electrocardiography in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Electrocardiol. 2020;62:39-45. Doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.08.007. Epub 2020 Aug 6. PMID: 32805546; PMCID: PMC7409871. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Chen L, Feng Y, Tang J, Hu W, Zhao P, Guo X, et al. Surface electrocardiographic characteristics in coronavirus disease 2019: Repolarization abnormalities associated with cardiac involvement. ESC Heart Fail. 2020;7(6):4408-15. Doi: 10.1002/ehf2. 12991. Epub 2020 Sep 8. PMID: 32898341; PMCID: PMC7754780. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Li Y, Liu T, Tse G, Wu M, Jiang J, Liu M, et al. Electrocardiograhic characteristics in patients with coronavirus infection: A single-center observational study. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2020;25(6):e12805. Doi: 10.1111/anec.12805. Epub 2020 Sep 20. PMID: 32951285; PMCID: PMC7536937. [crossref]
30.
Yang D, Li J, Gao P, Chen T, Cheng Z, Cheng K, et al. The prognostic significance of electrocardiography findings in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A retrospective study. Clin Cardiol. 2021;44(7):963-70. https://Doi.org/10.1002/ clc.23628.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62438.17822

Date of Submission: Dec 24, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Feb 04, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Feb 21, 2023
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 27, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 26, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Feb 18, 2023 (3%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com