Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 82582

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : May | Volume : 17 | Issue : 5 | Page : OC24 - OC28 Full Version

Association of Low Serum Albumin Levels and its In-hospital Adverse Outcomes among Patients Presenting with Acute Coronary Syndrome in a Tertiary Care Hospital of West Bengal, India


Published: May 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60490.17825
Bichitra Biswas, Kuntolika Mani, Ranajit Bari, Sandip Ghosh, Chanchal Kumar Jana

1. Specialist Medical Officer, Department of General Medicine, Basirhat District Hospital, Basirhat, West Bengal, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, IPGME&R, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Tamralipto Government Medical College, Tamluk, West Bengal, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of General Medicine, IPGME&R, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 5. Retired Professor and Head, Department of General Medicine, R.G. Kar Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Ranajit Bari,
Flat No. 203, B Block, Mayfair Venus II, 354, S.N Ghosh Avenue, Narendrapur, Kolkata-700103, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: dr.ranajit@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) is characterised by hypercoagulability and inflammation. In the acute presentation of Ischaemic Heart Disease (IHD), such as ACS, serum albumin may also play an important role. Many patients with an ischaemic cerebrovascular accident, a condition similar to ACS, had low serum albumin levels.

Aim: To estimate serum albumin levels in patients with ACS and their relation to hospital adverse outcomes.

Materials and Methods: The present prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of General Medicine at R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, West Bengal, India. The duration of the study was 18 months, from July 2019 to October 2020. Patients with ACS were included irrespective of age, sex, race, and predisposing factors such as Hypertension (HTN), Diabetes Mellitus (DM), hyperthyroidism, and dyslipidaemia. A total of 125 patients were included, and details such as relevant history, examination findings, laboratory investigation, Electrocardiography (ECG), Echocardiography (ECHO), chest X-ray Posteroanterior (PA) view were included. Chi-square test and logistic regression were applied.

Results: A total of 94 (75.2%) patients were male. 49 (39.2%) study patients had DM. A total of 10 (8%) patients presented with cardiac arrest at admission. In-hospital death occurred in 9 (7.2%) cases. 59 (47.2%) patients had a normal serum albumin level (3.5-4.5). 61 (48.8%) had mild to moderate hypoalbuminaemia (2.5-3.5), and only 5 (4%) had severe hypoalbuminaemia (<2.5). The association of in-hospital complications vs serum albumin level was statistically significant (p<0.0001). A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that male gender (p-value=0.026), smoking (p-value=0.008), arrhythmia (p-value=0.002), increased creatinine (p-value=0.032), and hypoalbuminaemia (p<0.001) were statistically significant independent predictors of in-hospital adverse outcomes.

Conclusion: The low serum albumin level, measured immediately on hospital admission in ACS patients, was associated with in-hospital complications, and when adjusted for other covariates, hypoalbuminaemia predicts in-hospital adverse outcomes independently.

Keywords

Coronary event, Hypoalbuminaemia, In-house complication, Single centre study

The ACS is a hypercoagulable and inflammatory state that occurs due to the mismatch between myocardial oxygen supply and demand, resulting in the following processes that lead to the formation of thrombus: plaque rupture and erosion causing disruption of unstable coronary plaque or a protruding calcified module leading to the formation of intracoronary thrombus and an inflammatory response. In patients with Non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI), there are multiple such vulnerable plaques (1). The normal physiological concentration of serum albumin has an antioxidant mechanism that provides significant reduction in myocardial injury from ischaemia and reperfusion (2),(3). Albumin helps in the formation of prostaglandin D2 and inhibits thromboxane synthase. Hence, albumin enhances the inhibition of platelet aggregation. Several conditions are associated with elevated blood viscosity, which is an important risk factor for atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease, and its adverse consequences (4). In various clinical conditions, serum albumin is traditionally considered a reliable biomarker for risk prediction. Low serum albumin has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality (5),(6). There is still insufficient evidence regarding the factors affecting outcomes after ACS.

In recent times, the clinical manifestation and prognosis of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) have altered due to emerging medical therapies and innovative revascularisation procedures. Therefore, it is important to identify new biomarkers and reevaluate the significance of traditional risk markers.

The association of low serum albumin with Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) and mortality has been shown in different populations in several studies (7),(8),(9). In ACS, which is an acute phase of IHD, where serum albumin might have an important role, low serum albumin has been shown to be an important predictor of mortality in acute ischaemic stroke, a condition resembling ACS (10). However, the impact of hypoalbuminaemia on the outcome of ACS has not been well studied. Therefore, the objectives of the present study were to estimate serum albumin levels in patients presenting with ACS and predict in-hospital outcomes according to serum albumin levels.

Material and Methods

The present study was a prospective observational study, conducted in the Department of General Medicine at R.G. Kar Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. The duration of the study was 18 months, from July 2019 to October 2020. Approval of Institutional Ethics Committee was taken prior to the study (Approval no. RKC/309). A written informed consent was taken from each patient prior to their inclusion in the study.

Inclusion criteria: Patients with ACS who were admitted in General Medicine Ward of the Hospital irrespective of age, sex, race and predisposing factors such as DM, HTN, thyroid disease and dyslipidaemia were included.

Exclusion criteria: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) (beyond stage III), chronic liver disease, presence of stroke, recent history of trauma and skeletal muscle injury, malignancy, known patients with chronic inflammatory disease and ongoing infectious disease, venous thromboembolism, patients with heart failure, cardiogenic shock, arrhythmia or valvular heart diseases were excluded.

Sample size calculation: Statistical formula for sample size: N={(Z1-α/2)2xPxQ}/L2. In the present study, putting the below mentioned values (Z1-α/2)=1.96 considering 95% confidence level P=prevalence of adverse outcomes among ACS patients with hypoalbuminaemia i.e., 20% Q=100-P i.e., 80L=precision or margin of error which is less than 10 and less than P, here, the value taken is 7. So, calculating the above equation the sample size (N) of this study was 125. Samples were chosen by systematic random sampling and every 4th patient was selected as their study sample after choosing the first patient randomly. Hence, the authors included 138 patients for the study. 13 patients denied participating in the study, so, the final study sample was 125.

Study Procedure

According to a study conducted by Hartopo AB et al., there was 20% prevalence of adverse outcomes among ACS patients with hypoalbuminaemia (11). All ACS patient admitted in General Medicine ward at R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital for management and who had given consent for participation in the present study were evaluated with relevant history taking, examination, laboratory investigations ECG, ECHO, digital chest X-ray PA view. The following outcomes were assessed during hospital admission: Heart failure, arrhythmia, arrhythmia with Left Ventricular Failure (LVF), arrhythmia with pleural effusion, cardiogenic shock and death.

The following is the criteria by which ACS patients were diagnosed and selected for data collection:

Definitions and criteria of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)

a. C Clinical criteria (1):

Typical presentation was with severe chest discomfort with one of these three features:

• Occurrence at rest or with minimal exertion lasting for >10
minutes.
• Relatively recent onset i.e., within prior two weeks.
• A crescendo pattern i.e., distinctly more severe, prolonged or frequent than previous episode.
Common site of discomfort: Substernal with radiation to left arm, left shoulder and or upwards to
neck or jaw.

b. ECG criteria of AC S (12),(13),(14):

a. ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI): Elevation of origin of ST segment at its junction (J point) with QRS complex in two or more contiguous leads of

• 0.1 mv (1 mm) in any lead except V2 and V3.
• In V2 and V3 ST J point elevation of
• 0.25 mv (2.5 mm) in men <40 years of age.
• 0.20 mv (2 mm) in men ≥40 years of age.
• 0.15 mv (1.5 mm) in women.

c. Non ST-elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (NSTE-ACS):

• New down sloping or horizontal ST segment depression ≥0.05 mv in two contiguous leads.
• T wave inversion ≥0.1 mv in two contiguous leads with prominent R wave or R:S ratio >1

d. A Acute Myocardial Infarction (MI) in presence of Left Bundle Brunch Block (LBBB):


• ST elevation ≥1 mm and concordant with a predominantly negative QRS.
• ST depression ≥1 in leads V1, V2 or V3
• ST elevation ≥5 mm and discordant with a predominantly negative QRS.

e. A Angina equivalent (1):

• Dyspnoea
• Epigastric discomfort
• Nausea
• Weakness

Serum Albumin was estimated by dye binding (bromocresol green) method. Patients were classified according to albumin levels into normal albumin group (3.5-4.5 gm/dL), mild to moderate hypoalbuminaemia (2.5-3.5 gm/dL) and severe hypoalbuminaemia (<2.5 gm/dL) group (15),(16). N-Terminal Pro-B type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-ProBNP) was estimated using serum sample by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) method. A value more than 125 pg/mL was taken as elevated level (17).

Statistical Analysis

Microsoft excel spreadsheet was used for data entry. Statistical analysis was done by Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27.0; Inc., Chicago, USA) and GraphPad Prism version 5. Data was summarised as count and percentage for categorical variables and mean and standard deviation for numerical variables. For categorical variables a Chi-square test was used and t-test was used for numerical variables. One-way Analysis of Variance (one-way ANOVA) was used to compare the means of three or more samples for numerical data. Logistic regression analysis was done. The p-value ≤0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

Results

Most of the patients 94 (75.2%) were males and 31 (24.8%) patients were females. A 48.0% of study patients were smoker (Table/Fig 1). Most of the patients (95) had normal pulse rate (60-100 bpm). 20 patients had bradycardia (<60) and 10 patients had tachycardia (>100). Most of the patients had normal Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) 90/119 56 (44.8%). Patients with SBP <90 were only five and SBP ≥140 were only 22 (17.6%) cases. Total 102 (81.6%) patients had normal Jugular Venus Pressure (JVP). 15 (12%) study patients had raised Jugular Venous Pulse (JVP) and 8 (6.4%) cases had flat JVP.

A total of 55 (44%) patients had raised NT-ProBNP value. Most of the patients had normal chest X-ray findings 82 (65.6%), whereas, 11 (8.8%) cases had apical distribution of vessels. Digital X-ray of chest PA view showed Kerley lines in 9 (7.2%) cases. Normal serum albumin level (3.5-4.5) was found in 59 (47.2%) patients, 61 (48.8%) had mild to moderate hypoalbuminaemia (2.5-3.5) and only 5 (4%) patients had severe hypoalbuminaemia (<2.5) (Table/Fig 2). Most common in-hospital complication was arrhythmia in 26 (20.8%) cases and least common was arrhythmia with pleural effusion in 2 (1.6%) patients. In-hospital death was reported in 9 (7.2%) cases. No in-hospital complications found in 57 (45.6%) cases. A 47 (37.6%) cases were discharged with complication (Table/Fig 3). The association between in-hospital complication vs serum albumin level was statistically significant (p<0.0001) (Table/Fig 4). There was significant association between NT-ProBNP and serum albumin level (<0.001). Among patients in normal albumin group NT-ProBNP was elevated in 10 (16.9%) cases, whereas, it was elevated in 41 (67.2%) cases in mild to moderate hypoalbuminaemia group and 4 (80%) cases in severe hypoalbuminaemia group (Table/Fig 5). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was done which showed smoking (p-value=0.008), male gender (p-value=0.026), arrythmia (p-value=0.002), increased creatinine (p-value=0.032) and hypoalbuminaemia (p<0.001) were statistically significant independent predictors of in-hospital adverse outcomes (Table/Fig 6).

Discussion

The ACS is a hypercoagulable and inflammatory state. IHD and its most serious acute presentation i.e., ACS are most common causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide (1). Arques S et al., found the usefulness of serum albumin as an additional prognostic marker to the usual prognostic variables in older patients with severe acute heart failure (18). In the present study, heart failure was more common in mild to moderate hypoalbuminaemia group (81.3%) than normal albumin group (18.8%) (p<0.001). In ACS patients, Wang W et al., found significantly higher adverse cardiac events in low prealbumin group as compared with normal prealbumin. According to their study with ACS patients, lower serum prealbumin level was shown to be associated with more in-hospital complications (19). In present study, higher adverse event in hypoalbuminaemia groups were found. A significant association was found between serum albumin and NT-ProBNP level (p<0.0001), which was more frequently elevated among patients in mild to moderate hypalbuminaemia (67.2%) and severe hypoalbuminaemia (80%) groups than normal albumin group (16.9%). Jäntti T et al., found that, hypoalbuminaemia was commonly seen in early cardiogenic shock. They also noticed plasma albumin decreased frequently during hospital stay. They found the significant association between plasma albumin early at admission and adverse outcome. The baseline low plasma albumin was associated with mortality which was independent of other known risk factors (20). In present study, mortality was more frequent in mild to moderate hypoalbuminaemia 5 (55.6%) and severe hypoalbuminaemia group 3 (33.3%) than in normal albumin group 1 (11.1%). There was significant association between serum albumin and death (p<0.001). Suzuki S et al., found that Serum albumin was associated with Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) in newly diagnosed stable CAD patients and that association was independent of other risk predictors (21).

In a meta-analysis, Wang Y et al., showed the association between low serum albumin and increased risk of atrial fibrillation (22). In present study, arrythmia was developed in 26 (20.8%) cases, of them 16 cases were from mild to moderate hypoalbuminaemia group. Arrythmia and LVF were present in 12 (9.6%) cases. Among them 11 cases were from mild to moderate hypoalbuminaemia group. Hartopo AB et al., found that hypoalbuminaemia was associated with 2.8 fold increased risk of developing adverse outcomes in ACS. Though, after adjustment of other known covariates, hypoalbuminaemia did not predict in-hospital complications significantly (11). In present study, multivariate logistic regression analysis was done where hypoalbuminaemia was a significant independent risk predictor along with other known risk factors like male gender, smoking, increased serum creatinine and arrythmia. Smoking is a known risk factor for atherosclerotic CVD. But, some studies have found lesser in-hospital complications of current smokers after ACS which is known as smoker’s paradox. This phenomenon can be largely explained by lesser other risk factors and co-morbidities of smoker patients [23,24]. In the present study, smoking is significantly associated with in-hospital complication with odds ratio 0.721 indicative of less adverse events for smokers. Though, male gender is a risk factor for IHD, higher in-hospital complications have been shown in female in serval studies [25,26]. Cenko E et al., found higher 30 day mortality in young age female with STEMI even after adjustment of medication, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) and other co-morbidities (27). The present study population is male dominant (male 75.2% and female 24.8%). The odds ratio for male gender was 0.869, which indicates less adverse outcome for males than females. Raised creatinine, as seen in renal insufficiency is a known risk factor for CVD. Shlipak MG et al., found higher mortality in patients with renal insufficiency after ACS in elderly patients. One year mortality was 66% for those with moderate renal insufficiency, whereas, it was 46% for mild renal insufficiency and 24% with no renal insufficiency (28). In the present study, 28 (22.4%) cases had raised creatinine (>1.3 mg/dL) and raised creatinine was significantly associated with in-hospital adverse outcome with the odds ratio of 0.809. In a meta-analysis Zhu L et al., found that low serum albumin was a powerful independent predictor of all-cause mortality in hospitalised ACS patients (29). In the present study, authors found that hypoalbuminaemia predicted in-hospital outcome significantly even after adjustment with other covariates.

Limitation(s)

In spite of every sincere effort, present study was not devoid of shortcomings. It was a single centric study with relatively small sample size, which may not be sufficient. Pathogenesis of low serum albumin level remains a matter of speculation as, the authors did not measure the biomarkers associated with low serum albumin.

Conclusion

The present findings indicate that arrhythmia (20.8%) is the most common in-hospital complication, followed by heart failure (12.8%) in ACS patients. Low serum albumin measured at the time of hospital admission was associated with in-hospital adverse outcomes with an odds ratio of 1.667. It was also found that adverse outcomes were significantly associated with the severity of hypoalbuminaemia. Whether the impact of low serum albumin in the early phase of ACS was a result of inflammation or an independent effect needs to be clarified, so further studies are needed. Even after adjustment with other covariates, hypoalbuminaemia independently predicts in-hospital adverse outcomes.

Acknowledgement

The authors are thankful to all faculty residents and staff of Department of Cardiology, R.G. Kar Medical College for their support and cooperation.

References

1.
Guagliano RP, Cannon CP, Braunwald E; Harrison’s Principales of Internal Medicine; McGraw Hill Education, 20th edition, 2018:1866-1885.
2.
Watts JA, Maiorano PC. Trace amounts of albumin protect against ischemia and reperfusion injury in isolated rat hearts. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1999;31:1653-62. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Zhang WJ, Frei B. Albumin selectively inhibits TNF alpha induced vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 in human aortic endothelial cell. Cardiovasc Res 2002;55:820-29. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Joles JA, Willlekes-Koolschizn N, Koomans HA. Hypoalbuminemia causes high blood viscosity by increasing red cell lysophosphatidyl choline. Kidney Int. 1997;52:761-70. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Chien SC, Chen CY, Lin CF, Yeh H. Critical appraisal of the role of serum albumin in cardiovascular disease. Biomarker Res. 2017;5:31. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Sujino Y, Tanno J, Nakano S, Funada S, Hosoi Y, Senbonmatsu T, et al. Impact of hypoalbuminemia, frailty, and body mass index on early prognosis in older patients (≥85 years) with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Cardiol. 2015;66(3):263-68. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Goldwasser P, Feldman J. Association of serum albumin and mortality risk. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:693-703. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Beatty AL, IA K, Bibbins-Domingo K, Christenson RH, DeFilippi CR, Ganz P, et al. Traditional risk factors versus biomarkers for prediction of secondary events in patients with stable coronary heart disease: From the heart and soul study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(7):e001646. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Nelson JJ, Liao D, Sharrett AR, Folsom AR, Chambless LE, Shahar E, et al. Serum albumin level as a predictor of incident coronary heart disease: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151(5):468-77. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Carter AM, Catto AJ, Mansfield MW, Bamford JM, Grant PJ. Predictive variables for mortality after acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2007;38:1873-80. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Hartopo AB, Gharini PP, Setianto BY. Low serum albumin levels and in-hospital adverse outcomes in acute coronary syndrome. Int Heart J. 2010;51:221-26. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Wagner GS, Strauss DG. Marriott’s Practical Electrocardiography. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 12th edition, Wolters Kluwer; 2014:209-210.
13.
Scirica BM, Libby P, Morrow DA, Braunwald’s Heart Disease; Elsevier; 11 th edition, 2019:1118.
14.
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD; Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF task force for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2525-38. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Burtis CA, Ashwood MD. Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry. 3 rd Ed. Sounders; 1999.
16.
Akirov A, Masri-Iraqi H, Atamna A, Shimon I. Low albumin levels are associated with mortality risk in hospitalized patients. Am J Med. 2017;130(12):1465.e11-e19. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Corteville DC, Bibbins-Domingo K, Wu AH, Ali S, Schiller NB, Whooley MA. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide as a diagnostic test for ventricular dysfunction in patients with coronary disease: Data from the heart and soul study. Robert P. Guagliano, Christopher P. Cannon, Eugene Braunwald; Harrison’s Principales of Internal Medicine; McGraw Hill Education, 20th edition, 2018:1866-1885.
18.
Arques S, Roux E, Stolidi P, Gelisse R, Ambrosi P. Usefulness of serum albumin and serum total cholesterol in the prediction of hospital death in older patients with severe, acute heart failure. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2011;104(10):502-08. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Wang W, Wang CS, Ren D, Li T, Yao HC, Ma SJ. Low serum prealbumin levels on admission can independently predict in-hospital adverse cardiac events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Medicine. 2018;97(30):e11740. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Jäntti T, Tarvasmäki T, Harjola VP, Parissis J, Pulkki K, Javanainen T, et al. Hypoalbuminemia is a frequent marker of increased mortality in cardiogenic shock. PloS one. 2019;14(5):e0217006. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Suzuki S, Hashizume N, Kanzaki Y, Maruyama T, Kozuka A, Yahikozawa K. Prognostic significance of serum albumin in patients with stable coronary artery disease treated by percutaneous coronary intervention. Plos one. 2019;14(7):e0219044. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Wang Y, Du P, Xiao Q, Li J, Liu X, Tan J, et al. Relationship between serum albumin and risk of atrial fibrillation: A dose-response meta-analysis. Front Nutr. 2021;8:728353. Doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.728353. PMID: 34490334; PMCID: PMC8418186. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Aune E, Røislien J, Mathisen M, Thelle DS, Otterstad JE. The “smoker’s paradox” in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review. BMC Med. 2011;9:97. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Toluey M, Ghaffari S, Tajlil A, Nasiri B, Rostami A. The impact of cigarette smoking on infarct location and in-hospital outcome following acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2019;11(3):209-15. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Kawamoto KR, Davis MB, Duvernoy CS. Acute coronary syndromes: Differences in men and women. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2016;18(12):73. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Udell JA, Koh M, Qiu F, Austin PC, Wijeysundera HC, Bagai A, et al. Outcomes of women and men with acute coronary syndrome treated with and without percutaneous coronary revascularization. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e004319. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Cenko E, Yoon J, Kedev S, Stankovic G, Vasiljevic Z, Krljanac G, et al. Sex differences in outcomes after STEMI: Effect modification by treatment strategy and age. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(5):632-39. Doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0514. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Shlipak MG, Heidenreich PA, Noguchi H, Chertow GM, Browner WS, McClellan MB. Association of renal insufficiency with treatment and outcomes after myocardial infarction in elderly patients. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(7):555. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Zhu L, Chen M, Lin X. Serum albumin level for prediction of all-cause mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients: A meta-analysis. Bioscience Reports. 2020;40(1):BSR20190881.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60490.17825

Date of Submission: Sep 29, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Nov 19, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Feb 03, 2023
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 30, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 03, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jan 27, 2023 (25%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com